How p53 binds DNA as a tetramer.

The p53 tumor suppressor protein is a tetramer that binds sequence-specifically to a DNA consensus sequence consisting of two consecutive half-sites, with each half-site being formed by two head-to-head quarter-sites (--><-- --><--). Each p53 subunit binds to one quarter-site, resulting in all four DNA quarter-sites being occupied by one p53 tetramer. The tetramerization domain forms a symmetric dimer of dimers, and two contrasting models have the two DNA-binding domains of each dimer bound to either consecutive or alternating quarter-sites. We show here that the two monomers within a dimer bind to a half-site (two consecutive quarter-sites), but not to separated (alternating) quarter-sites. Tetramers bind similarly, with the two dimers within each tetramer binding to pairs of half-sites. Although one dimer within the tetramer is sufficient for binding to one half-site in DNA, concurrent interaction of the second dimer with a second half-site in DNA drastically enhances binding affinity (at least 50-fold). This cooperative dimer-dimer interaction occurs independently of tetramerization and is a primary mechanism responsible for the stabilization of p53 DNA binding. Based on these findings, we present a model of p53 binding to the consensus sequence, with the tetramer binding DNA as a pair of clamps.     

An ATP/ADP-Dependent Molecular Switch Regulates the Stability of p53-DNA Complexes

Interaction with DNA is essential for the tumor suppressor functions of p53. We now show, for the first time, that the interaction of p53 with DNA can be stabilized by small molecules, such as ADP and dADP. Our results also indicate an ATP/ADP molecular switch mechanism which determines the off-on states for p53-DNA binding. This ATP/ADP molecular switch requires dimer-dimer interaction of the p53 tetramer. Dissociation of p53-DNA complexes by ATP is independent of ATP hydrolysis. Low-level ATPase activity is nonetheless associated with ATP-p53 interaction and may serve to regenerate ADP-p53, thus recycling the high-affinity DNA binding form of p53. The ATP/ADP regulatory mechanism applies to two distinct types of p53 interaction with DNA, namely, sequence-specific DNA binding (via the core domain of the p53 protein) and binding to sites of DNA damage (via the C-terminal domain). Further studies indicate that ADP not only stabilizes p53-DNA complexes but also renders the complexes susceptible to dissociation by specific p53 binding proteins. We propose a model in which the DNA binding functions of p53 are regulated by an ATP/ADP molecular switch, and we suggest that this mechanism may function during the cellular response to DNA damage.     

Conformational shifts propagate from the oligomerization domain of p53 to its tetrameric DNA binding domain and restore DNA binding to select p53 mutants.

p53 is a conformationally flexible sequence-specific DNA binding protein mutated in many human tumors. To understand why the mutant p53 proteins associated with human tumors fail to bind DNA, we mapped the DNA binding domain of wild-type p53 and examined its regulation by changes in the protein conformation. Using site-directed mutagenesis, residues 90-286 of mouse p53 were shown to form the sequence-specific DNA binding domain. Two highly conserved regions within this domain, regions IV and V, were implicated in contacting DNA. Wild-type p53 bound DNA as a tetramer, each subunit recognizing five nucleotides of the 20 nucleotide-long DNA site. Conformational shifts of the oligomerization domain propagated to the tetrameric DNA binding domain, regulating DNA binding activity, but did not affect the subunit stoichiometry of wild-type p53 oligomers. Interestingly, conformational shifts could also be propagated within certain p53 mutants, rescuing DNA binding. One of these mutants was the mouse equivalent of human histidine 273, which is frequently associated with human tumors.     

Structure of p53 binding to the BAX response element reveals DNA unwinding and compression to accommodate base-pair insertion

The p53 core domain binds to response elements (REs) that contain two continuous half-sites as a cooperative tetramer, but how p53 recognizes discontinuous REs is not well understood. Here we describe the crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a naturally occurring RE located at the promoter of the Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX) gene, which contains a one base-pair insertion between the two half-sites. Surprisingly, p53 forms a tetramer on the BAX-RE that is nearly identical to what has been reported on other REs with a 0-bp spacer. Each p53 dimer of the tetramer binds in register to a half-site and maintains the same protein–DNA interactions as previously observed, and the two dimers retain all the protein–protein contacts without undergoing rotation or translation. To accommodate the additional base pair, the DNA is deformed and partially disordered around the spacer region, resulting in an apparent unwinding and compression, such that the interactions between the dimers are maintained. Furthermore, DNA deformation within the p53-bound BAX-RE is confirmed in solution by site-directed spin labeling measurements. Our results provide a structural insight into the mechanism by which p53 binds to discontinuous sites with one base-pair spacer.     

Sequence analysis of p53 response-elements suggests multiple binding modes of the p53 tetramer to DNA targets

The p53 tetramer recognizes specifically a 20-bp DNA element. Here, we examined symmetries encoded in p53 response elements (p53REs). We analyzed base inversion correlations within the half-site, as well as in the full-site palindrome. We found that p53REs are not only direct repeats of half-sites; rather, two p53 half-sites couple to form a higher order 20bp palindrome. The palindrome couplings between the half-sites are stronger for the human than for the mouse genome. The full-site palindrome and half-site palindrome are controlled by insertions between the two half-sites. The most notable feature is that the full-site palindrome with coupling between quarter-sites one and four (H14 coupling) dominates the p53REs without insertions. The most frequently observed insertion in human p53REs of 3bp enhances the half-site palindrome. The statistical frequencies of the coupling between the half-sites in the human genome correlate with grouped experimental p53 affinities with p53REs. Examination of known p53REs indicates the H14 couplings are stronger for positive regulation than for negatively regulated p53REs, with repressors having the lowest H14 couplings. We propose that the palindromic sequence couplings may encode such potential preferred multiple binding modes of the p53 tetramer to DNA.     

On the mechanism of sequence-specific DNA-dependent acetylation of p53: the acetylation motif is exposed upon DNA binding

P53 acetylation requires p300-docking to two contiguous sites in the activation domain that in turn mediates DNA-dependent acetylation of the tetramer. In an attempt to further define the mechanism of DNA-dependent acetylation of p53, an in vitro system has been reconstituted with distinct p53 isoforms and has been used to reveal conformational constraints on p53 acetylation. Two native p53 tetrameric isoforms purified from Sf9 cells differing by the extent of phosphorylation within the C-terminal acetylation site are both acetylated in a sequence-specific DNA-dependent manner. By contrast, p53 purified from an Escherichia coli expression system is in a largely denatured conformation and its acetylation is DNA-independent. Heating native p53 to destroy the folded structure restores DNA-independent acetylation similar to that seen with bacterially expressed p53. There are at least two sites of conformational flexibility in the p53 tetramer: the first in the flexible S10 beta-sheet within the MDM2 ubiquitination sequence and the second in the C-terminal regulatory domain. We analysed therefore whether DNA-dependent acetylation correlated with conformational changes in either of these two regions. DNA-dependent acetylation of p53 is maintained in a dose-dependent manner by low concentrations of consensus site DNA under conditions where flexibility in the S10 beta-sheet region is maintained. Oligonucleotide DNAs that promote acetylation stimulate the binding of monoclonal antibodies PAb421 and ICA-9; two antibodies whose contiguous epitopes overlap the C-terminal acetylation motif. By contrast, bent oligonucleotide DNAs that conceal both the S10 beta-sheet from binding of the monoclonal antibody DO-12 and attenuate binding of the monoclonal antibody PAb421 can preclude acetylation. These data suggest that, in the absence of DNA, the acetylation motif of p53 is in a cryptic state, but after DNA binding, allosteric effects mediate an exposure of the acetylation motif to allow DNA-dependent acetylation of the tetramer.     

Reciprocal interference between the sequence-specific core and nonspecific C-terminal DNA binding domains of p53: implications for regulation.

The tumor suppressor p53 has two DNA binding domains: a central sequence-specific domain and a C-terminal sequence-independent domain. Here, we show that binding of large but not small DNAs by the C terminus of p53 negatively regulates sequence-specific DNA binding by the central domain. Four previously described mechanisms for activation of specific DNA binding operate by blocking negative regulation. Deletion of the C terminus of p53 activates specific DNA binding only in the presence of large DNA. Three activator molecules (a small nucleic acid, a monoclonal antibody against the p53 C terminus, and a C-terminal peptide of p53) stimulate sequence-specific DNA binding only in the presence of both large DNA and p53 with an intact C terminus. Our findings argue that interactions of the C terminus of p53 with genomic DNA in vivo would prevent p53 binding to specific promoters and that cellular mechanisms to block C-terminal DNA binding would be required.     

p53 binds to cisplatin-damaged DNA

We have previously shown that bacterially expressed p53 protein or p53 protein isolated from cis-diamminedichloroplatinum II (cisplatin)-damaged cells is capable of binding to double-stranded platinated DNA molecules lacking any p53 DNA binding sites. Here we report using various p53 mutants that two separate domains of p53 protein affect p53 binding to platinated DNA. Mutations within the central core of p53, the domain responsible for sequence-specific DNA binding activity, completely eliminated p53 binding to platinated DNA. Based on competition experiments p53 preferred binding to sequence-specific DNA molecules over platinated DNA molecules. However, p53 binding to platinated DNA molecules was significantly stronger than p53 interactions with DNA molecules lacking damage and a p53 consensus site. Finally, an antibody specific to the C-terminal domain of p53 (pAb421) which activates sequence-specific DNA binding activity inhibited p53 binding to platinated DNA. Taken together, these results suggest that in addition to binding to p53 DNA binding sites, p53 also interacts with cisplatin-damaged DNA molecules.     

Pliable DNA conformation of response elements bound to transcription factor p63

We show that changes in the nucleotide sequence alter the DNA conformation in the crystal structures of p63 DNA-binding domain (p63DBD) bound to its response element. The conformation of a 22-bp canonical response element containing an AT spacer between the two half-sites is unaltered compared with that containing a TA spacer, exhibiting superhelical trajectory. In contrast, a GC spacers abolishes the DNA superhelical trajectory and exhibits less bent DNA, suggesting that increased GC content accompanies increased double helix rigidity. A 19-bp DNA, representing an AT-rich response element with overlapping half-sites, maintains superhelical trajectory and reveals two interacting p63DBD dimers crossing one another at 120°. p63DBD binding assays to response elements of increasing length complement the structural studies. We propose that DNA deformation may affect promoter activity, that the ability of p63DBD to bind to superhelical DNA suggests that it is capable of binding to nucleosomes, and that overlapping response elements may provide a mechanism to distinguish between p63 and p53 promoters.     

Noncanonical DNA motifs as transactivation targets by wild type and mutant p53

Sequence-specific binding by the human p53 master regulator is critical to its tumor suppressor activity in response to environmental stresses. p53 binds as a tetramer to two decameric half-sites separated by 0-13 nucleotides (nt), originally defined by the consensus RRRCWWGYYY (n = 0-13) RRRCWWGYYY. To better understand the role of sequence, organization, and level of p53 on transactivation at target response elements (REs) by wild type (WT) and mutant p53, we deconstructed the functional p53 canonical consensus sequence using budding yeast and human cell systems. Contrary to early reports on binding in vitro, small increases in distance between decamer half-sites greatly reduces p53 transactivation, as demonstrated for the natural TIGER RE. This was confirmed with human cell extracts using a newly developed, semi-in vitro microsphere binding assay. These results contrast with the synergistic increase in transactivation from a pair of weak, full-site REs in the MDM2 promoter that are separated by an evolutionary conserved 17 bp spacer. Surprisingly, there can be substantial transactivation at noncanonical (1/2)-(a single decamer) and (3/4)-sites, some of which were originally classified as biologically relevant canonical consensus sequences including PIDD and Apaf-1. p53 family members p63 and p73 yielded similar results. Efficient transactivation from noncanonical elements requires tetrameric p53, and the presence of the carboxy terminal, non-specific DNA binding domain enhanced transactivation from noncanonical sequences. Our findings demonstrate that RE sequence, organization, and level of p53 can strongly impact p53-mediated transactivation, thereby changing the view of what constitutes a functional p53 target. Importantly, inclusion of (1/2)- and (3/4)-site REs greatly expands the p53 master regulatory network.     

p53 DNA binding can be modulated by factors that alter the conformational equilibrium.

The p53 tumor suppressor protein is a dimer of dimers that binds its consensus DNA sequence (containing two half-sites) as a pair of clamps. We show here that after one wild-type dimer of a tetramer binds to a half-site on the DNA, the other (unbound) dimer can be in either the wild-type or the mutant conformation. An equilibrium state between these two conformations exists and can be modulated by two types of regulators. One type modifies p53 biochemically and determines the intrinsic balance of the equilibrium. The other type of regulator binds directly to one or both dimers in a p53 tetramer, trapping each dimer in one or the other conformation. In the wild-type conformation, the second dimer can bind to the second DNA half-site, resulting in drastically enhanced stability of the p53-DNA complex. Importantly, a genotypically mutant p53 can also be in equilibrium with the wild-type conformation, and when trapped in this conformation can bind DNA.     

Analysis of p53 "latency" and "activation" by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Evidence for different modes of high affinity DNA binding

The concept that the tumor suppressor p53 is a latent DNA-binding protein that must become activated for sequence-specific DNA binding recently has been challenged, although the "activation" phenomenon has been well established in in vitro DNA binding assays. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, we analyzed the binding of "latent" and "activated" p53 to double-stranded DNA oligonucleotides containing or not containing a p53 consensus binding site (DNAspec or DNAunspec, respectively). In the absence of competitor DNA, latent p53 bound DNAspec and DNAunspec with high affinity in a sequence-independent manner. Activation of p53 by the addition of the C-terminal antibody PAb421 significantly decreased the binding affinity for DNAunspec and concomitantly increased the binding affinity for DNAspec. The net result of this dual effect is a significant difference in the affinity of activated p53 for DNAspec and DNAunspec, which explains the activation of p53. High affinity nonspecific DNA binding of latent p53 required both the p53 core domain and the p53 C terminus, whereas high affinity sequence-specific DNA binding of activated p53 was mediated by the p53 core domain alone. The data suggest that high affinity nonspecific DNA binding of latent and high affinity sequence-specific binding of activated p53 to double-stranded DNA differ in their requirement for the C terminus and involve different structural features of the core domain. Because high affinity nonspecific DNA binding of latent p53 is restricted to wild type p53, we propose that it relates to its tumor suppressor functions.     

p53 Binding to Nucleosomal DNA Depends on the Rotational Positioning of DNA Response Element

The sequence-specific binding to DNA is crucial for the p53 tumor suppressor function. To investigate the constraints imposed on p53-DNA recognition by nucleosomal organization, we studied binding of the p53 DNA binding domain (p53DBD) and full-length wild-type p53 protein to a single p53 response element (p53RE) placed near the nucleosomal dyad in six rotational settings. We demonstrate that the strongest p53 binding occurs when the p53RE in the nucleosome is bent in the same direction as observed for the p53-DNA complexes in solution and in co-crystals. The p53RE becomes inaccessible, however, if its orientation in the core particle is changed by ∼180°. Our observations indicate that the orientation of the binding sites on a nucleosome may play a significant role in the initial p53-DNA recognition and subsequent cofactor recruitment.     

The dihedral symmetry of the p53 tetramerization domain mandates a conformational switch upon DNA binding.

The p53 tumor suppressor forms stable tetramers, whose DNA binding activity is allosterically regulated. The tetramerization domain is contained within the C-terminus (residues 323-355) and its three-dimensional structure exhibits dihedral symmetry, such that a p53 tetramer can be considered a dimer of dimers. Under conditions where monomeric p53 fails to bind DNA, we studied the effects of p53 C-terminal mutations on DNA binding. Residues 322-355 were sufficient to drive DNA binding of p53 as a tetramer. Within this region residues predicted by the three-dimensional structure to stabilize tetramerization, such as Arg337 and Phe341, were critical for DNA binding. Furthermore, substitution of Leu344 caused p53 to dissociate into DNA binding-competent dimers, consistent with the location of this residue at the dimer-dimer interface. The p53 DNA site contains two inverted repeats juxtaposed to a second pair of inverted repeats. Thus, the four repeats exhibit cyclic-translation symmetry and cannot be recognized simultaneously by four dihedrally symmetric p53 DNA binding domains. The discrepancy may be resolved by flexible linkers between the p53 DNA binding and tetramerization domains. When these linkers were deleted p53 exhibited novel DNA binding properties consistent with an inability to recognize four contiguous DNA repeats. Allosteric regulation of p53 DNA binding may involve repositioning the DNA binding domains from a dihedrally symmetric state to a DNA-bound asymmetric state.