Effect of glucose availability on pulsatile luteinizing hormone release in rams before and after castration

The hypothesis tested was that availability of glucose modulates the control of luteinizing hormone (LH) release. A second objective was to determine the role of testicular hormones in the control of pulsatile LH secretion during depressed blood glucose. Serial blood samples were collected at 15 min intervals for 8 h from intact pubertal Suffolk rams (n = 8; 7 months old) on consecutive days (Days 1, 2 and 3). Rams were castrated after sampling on Day 3 and samples were collected 3 weeks later on consecutive days (Days 4, 5 and 6). Insulin (120 units, iv) was given at Hour 4 of each of the six days to lower blood glucose. On Days 1 and 4, no other treatments were given (Control). On Days 2 and 5, LH releasing hormone (LHRH; 5 ng/kg, iv) was given at Hours 5, 6 and 7 to assess the ability of the pituitary to release LH. On Days 3 and 6, N-methyl-D,L-aspartate (NMA; 5 mg/kg, iv) was given at Hours 5, 6 and 7 to assess the ability of the hypothalamus to release LHRH. Insulin reduced plasma glucose by 52% for at least 3 h (P < 0.001). Insulin reduced the mean LH concentration (P < 0.05) and tended to reduce the LH response area (P < 0.10) in castrated animals during the control period. LHRH increased LH pulse number (P < 0.001) in intact rams and increased mean LH concentration (P < 0.01), LH pulse amplitude (P < 0.05) and LH response area (P < 0.01) in castrated animals compared to respective control periods. NMA increased mean LH concentration in intact rams (P < 0.0001) but did not affect mean LH in castrates. NMA increased LH pulse number in rams (P < 0.0001) but decreased number of pulses in castrates (P < 0.0001) compared to control periods. NMA increased LH pulse amplitude in both intact (P < 0.001) and castrated animals (P < 0.05). In conclusion, these results support the hypothesis that blood glucose concentrations influence the control of LH release in sheep. In addition, LH release in response to the LHRH secretagogue, NMA, is positively influenced by testicular hormones.     

Effects of melatonin on luteinizing hormone secretion in anestrous ewes following dopamine and opiate receptor blockade

In the present investigation we have examined the ability of melatonin to modify the pulsatile LH secretion induced by treatment with a DA antagonist (sulpiride, SULP) or opioid antagonist (naloxone, NAL) in intact mid-anestrous ewes. The experimental design comprised the following treatments-in experiment 1: (1) intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of vehicle (control I); (2) pretreatment with SULP (0.6 mg/kg subcutaneously) and then i.c.v. infusion of vehicle (SULP + veh); (3) pretreatment with SULP and then i.c.v. infusion of melatonin (SULP + MLT, 100 microg per 100 microl/h, total 400 microg). In experiment 2: (4) i.c.v. infusion of vehicle (control II); (5) i.c.v. infusion of NAL (NAL-alone, 100 microg per 100 microl/h, total 300 microg); (6) i.c.v. infusion of NAL in combination with MLT (NAL + MLT, 100 microg + 100 microg per 100 microl/h). All infusions were performed during the afternoon hours. Pretreatment with SULP induced a significant (P < 0.01) increase in LH pulse frequency, but not in mean LH concentration, compared with control I. In SULP + MLT-treated animals, the LH concentration was significantly (P < 0.01) higher during MLT infusion, but due to highly increased LH secretion in only one ewe. The significant changes in the SULP + MLT group occurred in LH pulse frequency. A few LH pulses were noted after melatonin administration compared with the number during the infusion (P < 0.05) and after vehicle infusion in the SULP + MLT group (P < 0.05). The i.c.v. infusion of NAL evoked a significant increase in the mean LH concentration (P < 0.001) and amplitude of LH pulses (P < 0.01) compared with these before the infusion. The enhanced secretion of LH was also maintained after i.c.v. infusion of NAL (P < 0.01) with a concomitant decrease in LH pulse frequency (P < 0.05). In NAL + MLT-treated ewes, mean plasma LH concentrations increased significantly during and after the infusion compared with that noted before ( P < 0.001). No difference in the amplitude of LH pulses was found in the NAL + MLT group, but this parameter was significantly higher in ewes during infusion of both drugs than during infusion of the vehicle (P < 0.01). The LH pulse frequency differed significantly (p < 0.05), increasing slightly during NAL + MLT administration and decreasing after the infusion. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that: (1) in mid-anestrous ewes EOPs, besides DA, are involved in the inhibition of the GnRH/LH axis; (2) brief administration of melatonin in long-photoperiod-inhibited ewes suppresses LH pulse frequency after the elimination of the inhibitory DA input, but seems to not affect LH release following opiate receptor blockade.     

Daily profiles of plasma prolactin (PRL), growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone, and melatonin, and of pituitary PRL mRNA and GH mRNA in male Long Evans rats in acute phase of adjuvant arthritis

We studied the effects of adjuvant arthritis (AA) on the endocrine circadian rhythms of plasma prolactin (PRL), growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone, and melatonin and of pituitary PRL and GH mRNA in male Long Evans rats. Groups of control and AA rats (studied 23 days after AA induction) that were housed under a 12/12 h light/dark cycle (light on at 06:00 h) were killed at 4 h intervals starting at 14:00 h. Cosinor analysis revealed a significant 12 h rhythm in PRL and PRL mRNA (p < 0.001) in controls with peaks at 14:00 h and 02:00 h, respectively. The peak at 02:00 h was abolished in the AA group resulting in a significant 24 h rhythm in parallel with that of PRL (p < 0.05) and PRL mRNA (p < 0.0001). Growth hormone showed no rhythm, but a significant rhythm of GH mRNA was present in both groups (p < 0.0001). Insulin-like growth factor-1 showed a 24 h rhythm in control but not in AA rats. The mean values of GH, GH mRNA, and IGF-1 were significantly reduced in AA. Luteinizing hormone displayed a significant 24 h rhythm (p < 0.01) peaking in the dark period in the control but not AA group. Testosterone showed in phase temporal changes of LH levels with AA abolishing the 02:00 h peak. Melatonin exhibited a significant 24 h rhythm in control (p < 0.001) and AA (p < 0.01) rats with maximum levels during the dark phase; the mesor value was higher in the AA males. These results demonstrate that AA interferes with the rhythms of all the studied hormones except the non-24 h (arrhythmic) GH secretion pattern and the rhythm in melatonin. The persistence of a distinct melatonin rhythm in AA suggests the observed disturbances of hormonal rhythms in this condition do not occur at the level of the pineal gland.     

Does prolactin influence the hypothalamo-pituitary GnRH-LH system in preovulatory-phase ewes?

The effects of prolonged infusions of prolactin (PRL) into the third ventricle of the brain of cycling ewes on the secretory activity of hypothalamic GnRH neurons and pituitary LH cells in the pars distalis during the proestrous day were studied. Mature Blackhead ewes were infused with vehicle (control, n=5) or with prolactin (200 mug/day, n=5) during 4 consecutive days prior to the next spontaneous ovulation. The dose of PRL was infused each day in 4 series of 50 mug/100 mul/h at 30-min. intervals, from 8.30 to 14.00 h. The animals were slaughtered on the 16th (proestrous) day of the estrous cycle immediately after the last infusion and their brains were fixed in situ. Plasma samples were collected for 6 h at 10 min. intervals, on days 12 (before the infusions) and 16 of the cycle. The distribution pattern, number and morphology of GnRH neurons in vehicle- and PRL-infused ewes were found to be similar and typical for the proestrous phase of the cycle. The immunoreactive (ir) GnRH stores in the median eminence were high and similar in both groups. There were no differences between control and PRL-treated ewes in the number or features of irLH cells. The area fraction and optical density for irLH cells and mRNA LHbeta-expressing cells did not differ between control and experimental groups. Irrespective of the kind of infusion, changes in LH secretion during the estrous cycle were similar in control and PRL-infused ewes. Mean plasma LH concentrations were higher (p<0.001) on day 16 compared to day 12 of the cycle. There were no differences in plasma LH concentrations or in the parameters of pulsatile LH secretion between groups. In conclusion, repeated, several-hour-long infusions of PRL into the CNS prior to the next spontaneous ovulation in ewes has no direct effect on the secretory activity of GnRH neurons, and/or the synthesis, accumulation, or tonic release of LH from the pituitary gonadotrophs.     

The inhibitory action of corticotropin-releasing hormone on gonadotropin secretion in the ovariectomized rhesus monkey is not mediated by adrenocorticotropic hormone

Earlier observations in our laboratory indicated that i.v. infusion of human/rat corticotropin-releasing hormone (hCRH) suppresses pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) release in ovariectomized rhesus monkeys. Since cortisol secretion increased significantly as well, it was not possible to exclude the possibility that this inhibitory effect of hCRH on gonadotropins was related to the activation of the pituitary/adrenal axis. The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of pituitary/adrenal activation in the effect of hCRH on LH and FSH secretion. We compared the effects of 5-h i.v. infusions of hCRH (100 micrograms/h, n = 7) and of human adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) (1-24) (5 micrograms/h, n = 3; 10 micrograms/h, n = 3, 20 micrograms/h, n = 3) to ovariectomized monkeys on LH, FSH, and cortisol secretion. As expected, during the 5-h ACTH infusions, cortisol levels increased by 176-215% of baseline control, an increase similar to that observed after CRH infusion (184%). However, in contrast to the inhibitory effect observed during the CRH infusion, LH and FSH continued to be released in a pulsatile fashion during the ACTH infusions, and no decreases in gonadotropin secretion were observed. The results indicated that increases in ACTH and cortisol did not affect LH and FSH secretion and allowed us to conclude that the rapid inhibitory effect of CRH on LH and FSH pulsatile release was not mediated by activation of the pituitary/adrenal axis.     

The effect of the presence and pattern of luteinizing hormone stimulation on ovulatory follicle development in sheep

The aim of this study was to examine the role of LH on the growth of the large preovulatory follicle and its secretion of hormones in sheep. Ewes with ovarian autotransplants were treated with GnRH-antagonist at the time of luteal regression and different LH regimes applied for 60-66 h before administration of an ovulatory stimulus (hCG). In Experiment 1 (N = 24; n = 8), ewes received either no LH or constant or pulsatile infusion of LH at the same dose (1.25 microg/h). In Experiment 2 (N = 12, n = 6), LH was constantly infused at a rate of 1.25 microg or 2.5 microg oLH/h. In Experiment 1, animals receiving either pulsatile or constant LH exhibited increases in estradiol and inhibin A secretion (P < 0.001) and a depression in FSH (P < 0.001) that resembled the normal follicular phase. Similarly in Experiment 2, doubling the dose of LH resulted in a two-fold increase in ovarian estradiol secretion (P < 0.05) but no other changes. All animals receiving LH, regardless of the pattern of stimulation, ovulated and established a normal luteal phase. In contrast, no LH treatment resulted in constant immuno-active LH without pulses, unchanged FSH and inhibin A concentrations (P < 0.05), and basal estradiol secretion (P < 0.001). Morphologically normal large antral follicles were observed in this group and although corpora lutea formed in response to hCG, progesterone profiles were abnormal. In conclusion, these results suggest that LH is an essential requirement for normal ovulatory follicle development and subsequent luteal function and show that a pulsatile mode of LH stimulation is not required by ovulatory follicles.     

Central action of insulin regulates pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in the diabetic sheep model

This study tested the hypothesis that central mechanisms regulating luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion are responsive to insulin. Our approach was to infuse insulin into the lateral ventricle of six streptozotocin-induced diabetic sheep in an amount that is normally present in the CSF when LH secretion is maintained by peripheral insulin administration. In the first experiment, we monitored cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) insulin concentrations every 3-5 h in four diabetic sheep given insulin by peripheral injection (30 IU). The insulin concentration in the CSF was increased after insulin injection, and there was a positive relationship between CSF and plasma concentrations of insulin (r = 0.80, P < 0.01). In the second experiment, peripheral insulin administration was discontinued, and the sheep received either an intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of insulin (12 mU/day in 2.4 ml saline) or saline (2.4 ml/day) for 5 days (n = 6) in a crossover design. The dose of insulin (i.c.v.) was calculated to approximate the increase in CSF insulin concentration found after peripheral insulin treatment. To monitor LH secretory patterns, blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture at 10-min intervals for 4 h on the day before and 5 days after the start of i.c.v. insulin infusion. To monitor the increase in CSF insulin concentrations, a single CSF sample was collected one and four days after the start of the central infusion. The i.c.v. insulin infusion increased CSF insulin concentrations above those in saline-treated animals (P < 0.05) and maintained them at or above the peak levels achieved after peripheral insulin treatment. Central insulin infusion did not affect peripheral (plasma) insulin or glucose concentrations. LH pulse frequency in insulin-treated animals was greater than that in saline-treated animals (3.5 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.3 pulses/4 h, P < 0.01), but it was less than that during peripheral insulin treatment (4.8 +/- 0.2 pulses/4 h, P < 0.01). Our findings suggest that physiologic levels of central insulin supplementation are able to increase pulsatile LH secretion in diabetic sheep with low peripheral insulin. These results are consistent with the notion that central insulin plays a role in regulating pulsatile GnRH secretion.     

Growth hormone and prolactin secretion in hypophysial stalk-transected pigs as affected by growth hormone and prolactin-releasing and inhibiting factors.

Control of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) release was investigated in hypophysial stalk-transected (HST) and stalk-intact pigs by determining the effects of analogs of GH-releasing factors (GHRF), somatostatin (SRIF), arginine, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, alpha-methyl-rho-tyrosine, and haloperidol. HST and control gilts were challenged with intravenous injections of human pancreatic GHRF(1-40)OH, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, and analogs of rat hypothalamic GHRF. HST animals remained acutely responsive to GHRF by releasing 2-fold greater quantities of GH than seen in controls. This occurred in spite of a 38% reduction in pituitary gland weight and a 32 and 55% decrease in GH concentration and total content. During SRIF infusion, GH remained at similar basal concentrations in HST and control gilts, but increased immediately after stopping SRIF infusion only in the controls. Releasable pituitary GH appears to accumulate during SRIF infusion. GHRF given during SRIF infusion caused a 2-fold greater release of GH than seen in animals receiving only GHRF. Arginine increased (P less than 0.05) GH release in controls, but not in HST gilts, which suggests that it acts through the central nervous system. Basal PRL concentrations were greater (P less than 0.05) in HST gilts than in control gilts. TRH acutely elevated circulating PRL (P less than 0.001) in HST gilts, suggesting that it acts directly on the pituitary gland. Haloperidol, a dopamine receptor antagonist, increased circulating PRL in controls but not in HST animals. alpha-Methyl-rho-tyrosine did not consistently increase circulating PRL, however, suggesting that it did not sufficiently alter turnover rate of the tyrosine hydroxylase pool. The results indicate that the isolated pituitary after HST remains acutely responsive to hypothalamic releasing and inhibiting factors for both GH and PRL release in the pig.     

Sex differences in acute luteinizing hormone responses to gonadectomy remain after progesterone antagonist and dopamine agonist treatment.

In male rats, LH pulse frequency and amplitude increase dramatically by 24 h after gonadectomy; in females they increase only slightly by this time. Mean FSH levels increase significantly in both sexes by 24 h after gonadectomy. The objectives of the present studies were to compare pulsatile LH, FSH, and prolactin (PRL) secretion in intact versus gonadectomized and in male versus female rats, and to determine whether the acute postovariectomy lag in LH rise is due to a lingering effect of the higher PRL and/or progesterone (P) levels seen in intact females. LH pulse amplitude, frequency, and mean levels increased significantly by 24 h after gonadectomy in both sexes, but the increases were greater in the males. FSH mean levels, but not pulse amplitude or frequency, increased similarly in both sexes by 24 h after gonadectomy. PRL did not change with gonadectomy. Treatment with CB-154 (a dopamine agonist), with or without RU486 (a P antagonist), 1 h before gonadectomy significantly suppressed pulsatile PRL secretion 1 day later in both sexes. There was no effect of either treatment on LH secretion. We have demonstrated that there is a sex difference in LH, but not FSH or PRL, pulsatility at 24 h after gonadectomy, and that female rats' higher PRL and P levels do not account for their slow rate of LH rise after ovariectomy.     

Effects of pulsatile infusion of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone on luteinizing hormone secretion and ovarian function in hypophysial stalk-transected beef heifers

Hypothalamic regulation of luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion and ovarian function were investigated in beef heifers by infusing LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) in a pulsatile manner (1 microgram/ml; 1 ml during 1 min every h) into the external jugular vein of 10 hypophysial stalk-transected (HST) animals. The heifers were HST approximately 30 mo earlier. All heifers had increased ovarian size during the LHRH infusion. The maximum ovarian size (16 +/- 2.7 cm3) was greater (P less than 0.01) than the initial ovarian size (8 +/- 1.4 cm3). Ovarian follicular growth occurred in 4 of 10 HST heifers in response to pulsatile LHRH infusion. In 2 heifers, an ovarian follicle developed to preovulatory size, but ovulation occurred in only 1 animal after the frequency of LHRH was increased (1 microgram every 20 min during 8 h). In blood samples obtained at 20-min intervals every 5th day, LH concentrations in peripheral serum remained consistently low (0.9 ng/ml) and nonepisodic in the 10 HST heifers during infusion of vehicle on the day before beginning LHRH. In 7 of 10 HST animals, episodic LH secretion occurred in response to pulsatile infusion of LHRH. In 3 of these long-term HST heifers, however, serum LH remained at basal levels and the isolated pituitary seemingly was unresponsive to pulsatile infusion of LHRH as indicated by sequential patterns of gonadotropin secretion obtained at 5-day intervals. These results indicate that pulsatile infusion of LHRH induces LH release in HST beef heifers.     

Different effects of subnormal levels of progesterone on the pulsatile and surge mode secretion of luteinizing hormone in ovariectomized goats

This study tested the hypothesis that endocrinological threshold levels of progesterone that induce negative feedback effects on the pulsatile and surge modes of LH secretion are different. Our approach was to examine the effects of subnormal progesterone concentrations on LH secretion. Long-term ovariectomized Shiba goats that had received implants of silastic capsules containing estradiol were divided into three groups. The high progesterone (high P) group received a subcutaneous implant of a silastic packet (50 x 70 mm) containing progesterone, and the low progesterone (low P) group received a similar implant of a small packet (25 x 40 mm) containing progesterone. The control (non-P) group received no treatment with exogenous progesterone. Blood samples were collected daily throughout the experiment for the analysis of gonadal steroid hormone levels and at 10-min intervals for 8 h on Days 0, 3, and 7 (Day 0: just before progesterone treatment) for analysis of the pulsatile frequency of LH secretion. Then estradiol was infused into the jugular vein of all animals at a rate of 3 microg/h for 16 h on Day 8 to determine whether an LH surge was induced. Blood samples were collected every 2 h from 4 h before the start of the estradiol infusion until 48 h after the start of the infusion. In each group, the mean +/- SEM concentration after progesterone implant treatment was 3.3 +/- 0.1 ng/ml for the high P group, 1.1 +/- 0.1 ng/ml for the low P group, and <0.1 ng/ml for the non-P group, concentrations similar to the luteal levels, subluteal levels, and follicular phase levels of the normal estrous cycle, respectively. The estradiol concentration ranged from 4 to 8 pg/ml after estradiol capsule implants in all groups. The LH pulse frequency was significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed on Day 3 (6.2 +/- 0.5 pulses/8 h) and on Day 7 (2.6 +/- 0.9 pulses/8 h) relative to Day 0 (9.0 +/- 0.5 pulses/8 h) in the high P group. In both the low P and non-P groups, however, the changes of pulsatile frequency of LH were not significantly different, and high pulses (7-9 pulses/8 h) were maintained on each of the 3 days they were tested. An LH surge (peak concentration, 100.3 +/- 11.0 ng/ml) occurred in all goats in the non-P group, whereas there was no surge mode secretion of LH in either the high P or the low P group. The results of this study support our hypothesis that the threshold levels of progesterone that regulate negative feedback action on the LH pulse and the LH surge are different. Low levels of progesterone, around 1 ng/ml, completely suppressed the LH surge but did not affect the pulsatile frequency of LH secretion.     

Altered secretion of growth hormone and luteinizing hormone after 84 h of sustained physical exertion superimposed on caloric and sleep restriction.

The pulsatile release of growth hormone (GH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) from the anterior pituitary gland is integral for signaling secretion of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and testosterone, respectively. This study examined the hypothesis that 84 h of sustained physical exertion with caloric and sleep restriction alters the secretion of GH and LH. Ten male soldiers [22 yr (SD 3), 183 cm (SD 7), 87 kg (SD 8)] had blood drawn overnight from 1800 to 0600 every 20 min for GH, LH, and leptin and every 2 h for IGF-I (total and free), IGF binding proteins-1 and -3, testosterone (total and free), glucose, and free fatty acids during a control week and after 84 h of military operational stress. Time-series cluster and deconvolution analyses assessed the secretion parameters of GH and LH. Significant results (P < or = 0.05) were as follows: body mass (-3%), fat-free mass (-2.3%), and fat mass (-7.3%) declined after military operational stress. GH and LH secretion burst amplitude (approximately 50%) and overnight pulsatile secretion (approximately 50%), IGF binding protein-1 (+67%), and free fatty acids (+33%) increased, whereas leptin (-47%), total (-27%) and free IGF-I (-32%), total (-24%) and free testosterone (-30%), and IGF binding protein-3 (-6%) decreased. GH and LH pulse number were unaffected. Because GH and LH positively regulate IGF-I and testosterone, these data imply that the physiological strain induced a certain degree of peripheral resistance. During periods of energy deficiency, amplitude modulation of GH and LH pulses may precede alterations in pulse numbers.     

Effects of adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) and progesterone on luteinising hormone (LH) secretion in recently castrated rams.

The goal of the present study was to determine whether ACTH and progesterone have any effect on LH secretion and pulse frequency in recently castrated rams. Six 2-year-old Corriedale rams were castrated in the winter. The day before castration, blood samples were taken in order to establish the precastration LH levels. The rams were divided into an untreated group (group U: n = 2) and a treated group (group T: n = 4). The first treatment consisted of the i.v. administration of 0.5 mg of ACTH on day 20 post-castration, immediately after the first sample had been taken. During the second treatment, subcutaneous progesterone implants were given to group T for 5 days. Control samplings were performed one week before each treatment. Prior to castration, the testosterone levels were low, while after castration they were below the detection limit of the assay. Cortisol and progesterone concentrations were basal before castration in all of the animals and after castration in group U and also in the control samplings for group T. ACTH treatment caused a significant increase in both cortisol and progesterone levels for 3 h (P < 0.001). Progesterone implants raised progesterone levels in group T, but cortisol levels remained basal. Before castration, all animals had low LH levels and hardly any pulse activity was seen. After castration, both the number of LH pulses and the mean LH production increased significantly in all of the animals (P < 0.01). During the ACTH trial, LH pulse frequency was significantly reduced for the first 4 h following ACTH administration (P = 0.013), however, no such differences occurred in the prior control period. No effect was seen on mean LH concentration during the ACTH treatment. Progesterone treatment did not have any effect on either the number of LH pulses nor on LH concentrations (P > 0.05).     

Regulated recovery of pulsatile growth hormone secretion from negative feedback: a preclinical investigation

Although stimulatory (feedforward) and inhibitory (feedback) dynamics jointly control neurohormone secretion, the factors that supervise feedback restraint are poorly understood. To parse the regulation of growth hormone (GH) escape from negative feedback, 25 healthy men and women were studied eight times each during an experimental GH feedback clamp. The clamp comprised combined bolus infusion of GH or saline and continuous stimulation by saline GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), GHRP-2, or both peptides after randomly ordered supplementation with placebo (both sexes) vs. E(2) (estrogen; women) and T (testosterone; men). Endpoints were GH pulsatility and entropy (a model-free measure of feedback quenching). Gender determined recovery of pulsatile GH secretion from negative feedback in all four secretagog regimens (0.003 ≤ P ≤ 0.017 for women>men). Peptidyl secretagog controlled the mass, number, and duration of feedback-inhibited GH secretory bursts (each, P < 0.001). E(2)/T administration potentiated both pulsatile (P = 0.006) and entropic (P < 0.001) modes of GH recovery. IGF-I positively predicted the escape of GH secretory burst number and mode (P = 0.022), whereas body mass index negatively forecast GH secretory burst number and mass (P = 0.005). The composite of gender, body mass index, E(2), IGF-I, and peptidyl secretagog strongly regulates the escape of pulsatile and entropic GH secretion from autonegative feedback. The ensemble factors identified in this preclinical investigation enlarge the dynamic model of GH control in humans.     

Central infusion of recombinant ovine leptin normalizes plasma insulin and stimulates a novel hypersecretion of luteinizing hormone after short-term fasting in mature beef cows

The present studies tested the hypotheses that short-term fasting would reduce leptin gene expression and circulating concentrations of leptin and insulin in mature, ovariectomized, estradiol-implanted cows and that intracerebroventricular infusions of recombinant ovine leptin (oleptin) would attenuate reductions in insulin concentration and stimulate LH secretion. Ovariectomized cows were assigned to either control (normal fed; n = 6) or fasted (60 h of fasting; n = 7) groups and infused with 200 microg recombinant oleptin three times at hourly intervals on Day 2 (n = 6 per group). Fasting decreased plasma concentrations of insulin (P < 0.01) and leptin (P < 0.04) but, as expected, did not reduce plasma concentrations of glucose or any LH secretion variable. Central infusion of leptin on Day 2 increased (P < 0.01) plasma concentrations of leptin in both control and fasted groups. Concomitantly, leptin treatment increased plasma insulin (P < 0.01) and LH (P < 0.03) concentrations in fasted but not in control cows. Increases in overall mean and baseline concentrations of LH after leptin treatment were the result of an augmentation of the size of LH pulses. The effects of fasting on leptin gene expression and the potential diurnal effects on circulating leptin were examined in a group of cows (n = 12) not treated with leptin. Fasting for 60 h reduced (P < 0.001) leptin gene expression by 30%, and no diurnal effects on circulating leptin were observed. These results indicate that although short-term fasting does not reduce the frequency or amplitude of LH pulses or the concentration of LH in mature cows, this nutritional perturbation clearly sensitizes both the hypothalamic-pituitary axis and endocrine pancreas to exogenous leptin, which in these experiments resulted in heightened secretion of both LH and insulin.     

Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse-frequency modulation on luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone secretion in hypothalamo/pituitary-disconnected rams

The effects of changes in pulse frequency of exogenously infused gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) were investigated in 6 adult surgically hypothalamo/pituitary-disconnected (HPD) gonadal-intact rams. Ten-minute sampling in 16 normal animals prior to HPD showed endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses occurring every 2.3 h with a mean pulse amplitude of 1.11 +/- 0.06 (SEM) ng/ml. Mean testosterone and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were 3.0 +/- 0.14 ng/ml and 0.85 +/- 0.10 ng/ml, respectively. Before HPD, increasing single doses of GnRH (50-500 ng) elicited a dose-dependent rise of LH, 50 ng producing a response of similar amplitude to those of spontaneous LH pulses. The effects of varying the pulse frequency of a 100-ng GnRH dose weekly was investigated in 6 HPD animals; the pulse intervals explored were those at 1, 2, and 4 h. The pulsatile GnRH treatment was commenced 2-6 days after HPD when plasma testosterone concentrations were in the castrate range (less than 0.5 ng/ml) in all animals. Pulsatile LH and testosterone secretion was reestablished in all animals in the first 7 days by 2-h GnRH pulses, but the maximal pulse amplitudes of both hormones were only 50 and 62%, respectively, of endogenous pulses in the pre-HPD state. The plasma FSH pattern was nonpulsatile and FSH concentrations gradually increased in the first 7 days, although not to the pre-HPD range. Increasing GnRH pulse frequency from 2- to 1-hour immediately increased the LH baseline and pulse amplitude. As testosterone concentrations increased, the LH responses declined in a reciprocal fashion between Days 2 and 7. FSH concentration decreased gradually over the 7 days at the 1-h pulse frequency. Slowing the GnRH pulse to a 4-h frequency produced a progressive fall in testosterone concentrations, even though LH baselines were unchanged and LH pulse amplitudes increased transiently. FSH concentrations were unaltered during the 4-h regime. These results show that 1) the pulsatile pattern of LH and testosterone secretion in HPD rams can be reestablished by exogenous GnRH, 2) the magnitude of LH, FSH, and testosterone secretion were not fully restored to pre-HPD levels by the GnRH dose of 100 ng per pulse, and 3) changes in GnRH pulse frequency alone can influence both gonadotropin and testosterone secretion in the HPD model.     

Effect of prolactin infused into the third ventricle on LH secretion in follicular-phase and ovariectomized ewes

This study tested a hypothesis that an acute enhancement of prolactin concentration within the central nervous system (CNS) would affect the LH secretion in ewes, depending on the level of endogenous estrogens in the organism. A 3-h long intracerebroventricular (icv.) infusion of ovine prolactin was made in late follicular-phase ewes, experiment 1, and in ovariectomized (OVX) ewes (experiment 2). No significant differences were found in mean LH concentrations and LH peak number before, during and after prolactin administration (50 microg/100 microl/h) in intact cyclic ewes. No diurnal rhythm in LH was detected in prolactin-infused ewes. From the two doses of prolactin used in OVX ewes (25 and 50 microg/100 microl/h) only the lower dose suppressed significantly the mean plasma LH concentration after the infusion, compared to those noted before (P < 0.01) and during (P < 0.001) prolactin treatment. Prolactin had no effect on LH pulse frequency in OVX ewes, however, a tendency to decrease in LH peak number was observed after administration of a lower dose. Plasma prolactin levels decreased significantly (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001) after the icv. infusion in all groups, indicating a high degree of effectiveness for exogenous prolactin at the level of the CNS.     

Effects of sexual experience, season, and mating stimuli on endocrine concentrations in the adult ram.

Two behavioral trials were conducted to determine the endocrine response of cortisol (C), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone (T), prolactin (PRL), and growth hormone (GH) in adult rams during exposure to estrous ewes during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. One-half of the rams in each season were sexually experienced (SE) and the remainder were sexually inexperienced (SI). All SE rams (100%) achieved at least one ejaculation, but only 33% (summer) and 67% (fall) SI rams achieved ejaculation. In the fall, mean C, T, and GH concentrations were elevated (P less than .001) compared to values measured in the summer, whereas LH and PRL levels were higher (P less than .01) in the summer. Overall levels of C, LH, T, and PRL were higher (P less than .05) in SE rams than in SI rams. Mean GH concentration was higher (P less than .10) in SI than in SE rams during restricted and complete access to estrous ewes. In general, LH, PRL, and GH responses were similar during restricted and complete access to females for both SE and SI rams. Cortisol levels were higher (P less than .06) during periods of mating and T levels were higher (P less than .001) during periods where activity was limited to courtship behavior (nasogenital investigation). Correlations of hormones to reproductive behaviors indicated that mounting and intromission were associated with elevations in C and PRL, whereas elevated LH and T tended to be associated with courtship behaviors. Correlations between GH and behaviors were inconsistent. However, there was an increased coincidence between time of female exposure and hormonal response that occurred in the fall; brief exposure to estrous ewes resulted in increases in concentrations of all hormones examined. The most consistent response was observed in sexually experienced rams during restricted access to females during the breeding season. These results provide new information on the effects of season and level of sexual experience upon hormonal and behavioral characteristics of the ram during mating activity.     

Inhibitory effects of cysteamine on neuroendocrine function

The action of cysteamine on anterior pituitary hormone secretion was studied in vivo using conscious, freely moving male rats and in vitro using anterior pituitary cells in monolayer culture. Administration of 500 micrograms cysteamine into the lateral cerebral ventricles of normal rats caused the complete inhibition of pulsatile GH secretion for a minimum of 6 h. This treatment also significantly decreased plasma concentrations of LH for at least 6 h in orchiectomized rat, TSH in short-term (0.5 month) thyroidectomized rats, and PRL in long-term (6 months) thyroidectomized rats. The in vivo stimulation of GH, LH, TSH and PRL with their respective releasing hormones 60 min after administration of cysteamine was not different from the response observed in rats pretreated with saline except for PRL where cysteamine pretreatment significantly inhibited the expected PRL increase. In vitro, 1 mM cysteamine decreased basal and TRH stimulated PRL release while not affecting basal or stimulated GH, LH, TSH and ACTH secretion. These data demonstrate the dramatic and wide-ranging effects of cysteamine on anterior pituitary hormone secretion. This action appears to be mediated through hypothalamic pathways for GH, LH and TSH and through a pituitary pathway for PRL.     

Insulin-like growth factor-I feedback regulation of growth hormone and luteinizing hormone secretion in the pig: evidence for a pituitary site of action

Three experiments (EXP) were conducted to determine the role of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in the control of growth hormone (GH) and LH secretion. In EXP I, prepuberal gilts, 65 ± 6 kg body weight and 140 days of age received intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of saline (n = 4), 25 μg (n = 4) or 75 μg (n = 4) IGF-I and jugular blood samples were collected. In EXP II, anterior pituitary cells in culture collected from 150-day-old prepuberal gilts (n = 6) were challenged with 0.1, 10 or 1000 nM [Ala15]-h growth hormone-releasing hormone-(1-29)NH2 (GHRH), or 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 30 nM IGF-I individually or in combinations with 1000 nM GHRH. Secreted GH was measured at 4 and 24 h after treatment. In EXP III, anterior pituitary cells in culture collected from 150-day-old barrows (n = 5) were challenged with 10, 100 or 1000 nM gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 30 nM IGF-I individually or in combinations with 100 nM GnRH. Secreted LH was measured at 4 h after treatment. In EXP I, serum GH and LH concentrations were unaffected by ICV IGF-I treatment. In EXP II, relative to control all doses of GHRH increased (P < 0.01) GH secretion. Only 1, 10, 30 nM IGF-I enhanced (P < 0.02) basal GH secretion at 4 h, whereas by 24 h all doses except for 30 nM IGF-I suppressed (P < 0.02) basal GH secretion compared to control wells. All doses of IGF-I in combination with 1000 nM GHRH increased (P < 0.04) the GH response to GHRH compared to GHRH alone at 4 h, whereas by 24 h all doses of IGF-I suppressed (P < 0.04) the GH response to GHRH. In EXP III, all doses of IGF-I increased (P < 0.01) basal LH levels while the LH response to GnRH was unaffected by IGF-I (P > 0.1). In conclusion, under these experimental conditions the results suggest that the pituitary is the putative site for IGF-I modulation of GH and LH secretion. Further examination of the role of IGF-I on GH and LH secretion is needed to understand the inhibitory and stimulatory action of IGF-I on GH and LH secretion.