Effects of enzymes and protein modifying reagents on the binding of 3H-prostaglandin E2 to porcine oxyntic mucosa in vitro

In the present study we have investigated the macromolecular nature of porcine oxyntic mucosal PGE2 binding sites and the involvement of specific functional groups in the binding interaction. Incubation of oxyntic mucosal membranes with DNAse or RNAse did not influence binding. Phospholipase A2 was strongly inhibitory while phospholipases C and D exerted variable effects. Trypsinization of the membranes also reduced binding and this reduction was prevented by addition of soybean trypsin inhibitor. Neuraminidase and beta-galactosidase treatments resulted in variable increases in binding activity. The increase in binding was due to an increase in binding affinity and/or binding site concentration. Protein modifying reagents acetic anhydride, N-ethylmaleimide and mercaptoethanol all reduced binding. These results suggest the importance of protein, lipid and carbohydrate components of the membrane in the binding interaction between PGE2 and its binding site. The ability of mercaptoethanol and N-ethylmaleimide to reduce binding suggest the involvement of both sulphydryl and disulphide groups in the PGE2 binding reaction.     

Specific binding of a stable prostacyclin analogue (Iloprost) to rat oxyntic mucosa

It has been reported that prostacyclin (PGI₂) is the predominant species of prostanoid in rat oxyntic mucosa. However since PGI₂ is inactivated under physiological conditions it has not been possible to demonstrate specific PGI₂ binding to the rat stomach. Therefore a stable PGI₂ analogue, Iloprost, was chosen as ligand in this study. Binding of labelled Iloprost to the 20,000 xg homogenate fraction of rat oxyntic mucosa was specific, dissociable, saturable and dependent upon the temperature and time of incubation. Neither tritiated PGE₂ nor 6 keto PGF_1α displayed any significant specific binding to rat stomach. A Scatchard plot of the equilibrium binding data for Iloprost was curvilinear and could be resolved into at least two binding sites. The average parameters determined from Scatchard analysis were: dissociation constants of 1.8 × 10⁻¹¹ M and 7.1 × 10⁻⁸ M and corresponding binding site concentrations of 12.0 pmole/mg and 4800 pmoles/mg protein respectively. PGI₂ was less potent than unlabelled Iloprost in displacing ³H-Iloprost from its binding site. The addition of PGE₂ to the incubation medium resulted in an increase in ³H-Iloprost binding. It is concluded that rat oxyntic mucosa has specific binding sites for PGI₂-like agents but not for either PGE₂ or 6 keto PGF_1α.     

Biphasic effect of sodium fluoride and guanyl nucleotides on binding to prostaglandin E2 receptors in rat epididymal adipocyte membranes

Both NaCl and NaF promoted PGE₂ binding to epididymal adipocyte membranes by apparent increase in the binding affinity. In order to distinguish between the effect of fluoride and the ‘salt effect’ of sodium on PGE₂ binding, the effects of Mg²⁺ and guanyl nucleotides on PGE₂ binding in the presence of NaCl or NaF were compared. Mg²⁺ decreased PGE₂ binding; high NaF concentration abolished this inhibition, while increased NaCl concentratipns did not affect the Mg²⁺ inhibition. In the presence of Mg²⁺ the effects of NaCl and NaF were additive. The enhancement of PGE₂ binding by fluoride, unlike sodium, was dependent on the presence of Mg²⁺. Induction of the membranes with GDPβS, Gpp(NH)p, GTP or GTPγS increased PGE, binding. Gradual increase in NaF concentrations in the presence of guanyl nucleotides resulted in stimulation of PGE₂ binding at low NaF concentrations and inhibition of PGE₂ binding at higjh NaF concentrations. No changes in the stimulatory action of NaCl on PGE₂ binding were observed in the simulatenous presence of NaCl and guanyl nucleotides. A biphasic effect on PGE₂ binding was observed with a wide concentration range of guanyl nucleotides. Treatment of the isolated membranes with cholera or pertussis toxins stimulated the adenylyl cyclase activity of the membranes, but failed to influence PGE₂ binding. The implications of these findings are discussed.     

Subcellular distribution of [H]-prostaglandin E2 binding sites in porcine gastric mucosa

The distribution of PGE₂ binding sites in four subcellular fractions (F1–F4) from porcine fundic mucosa obtained by gradient centrifugation was examined. Binding of HPGE₂ to fractions F2–F4 was specific, dissociable, saturable and pH dependent. A significant degree of specific binding was not evident in F1. The Scatchard analysis of binding to F2 and F3 revealed heterogenous populations of binding sites with similar dissociation constants but greater concentrations of binding sites than was evident in the initial 30,000 xg homogenate protein. A single class of low affinity binding sites was evident in F4. The ratio of total: nonspecific binding was approximately equal in F2 and F3. The ratio was considerably smaller in F4. The activity of 5' nucleotidase the marker enzyme for plasma membranes followed this ratio. There was no correlation between the binding ratio and marker enzyme activities for mitochondrial membranes and endoplasmic reticulum. These data suggest that high affinity PGE₂ binding sites occur predominantly on the plasma membrane from gastric mucosal tissue.     

Subcellular distribution of [3H]-prostaglandin E2 binding sites in porcine gastric mucosa

The distribution of PGE₂ binding sites in four subcellular fractions (F1–F4) from porcine fundic mucosa obtained by gradient centrifugation was examined. Binding of HPGE₂ to fractions F2–F4 was specific, dissociable, saturable and pH dependent. A significant degree of specific binding was not evident in F1. The Scatchard analysis of binding to F2 and F3 revealed heterogenous populations of binding sites with similar dissociation constants but greater concentrations of binding sites than was evident in the initial 30,000 xg homogenate protein. A single class of low affinity binding sites was evident in F4. The ratio of total: nonspecific binding was approximately equal in F2 and F3. The ratio was considerably smaller in F4. The activity of 5' nucleotidase the marker enzyme for plasma membranes followed this ratio. There was no correlation between the binding ratio and marker enzyme activities for mitochondrial membranes and endoplasmic reticulum. These data suggest that high affinity PGE₂ binding sites occur predominantly on the plasma membrane from gastric mucosal tissue.     

A modulating role of mercurials-sensitive sulfhydryl groups in synaptic GABA receptor binding

The specific binding of GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) agonist ³H-muscimol, to synaptic membranes from the rat brain showed a significant increase, when the membranous preparations were treated with a low concentration (10^?4–10^?5M) of mercurial sulfhydryl reagents such as p-chloromercuribenzoate and mercuric chloride. This activation in GABA receptor binding was bicuculline-sensitive, and was partially restored by subsequent treatments with 10 mM cysteine, penicillamine, or mercaptoethanol. Scatchard analysis of the binding revealed that this activation was due to the increase in the affinity of both high and low affinity bindings sites but not in the B_max values. On the other hand, the treatment of synaptic membranes with hydrophilic sulfhydryl reagents such as N-ethylmaleimide and iodoacetate had no effect on the binding. These hydrophilic sulfhydryl reagents, however, induced an increase of the binding following the pretreatment of synaptic membranes with 0.01% Triton X-100 or 0.5 U/mg prot. of phospholipase A₂ (EC 3.1.1.4.). These results suggest that mercurials-sensitive sulfhydryl groups, which are normally masked by membrane lipids, may play a modulating role in GABA receptor binding at central synapses.     

Gastric mucosal binding studies with enprostil: A potent anti-ulcer prostaglandin

The potent antiulcer prostaglandin enprostil binds with high affinity to porcine gastic mucosal tissues. This binding is saturable, dissociable and displaceable by compounds with similar structures. Various characteristics of binding such as pH optimum and displacement potencies suggest that enprostil binds to mucosal PGE₂ sites. Structure-activity and gastric mucosal binding relationships were also examined.     

Interaction of profilin‐1 and F‐actin via a β‐arrestin‐1/JNK signaling pathway involved in prostaglandin E2‐induced human mesenchymal stem cells migration and proliferation

Although many previous reports have examined the function of prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) in the migration and proliferation of various cell types, the role of the actin cytoskeleton in human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) migration and proliferation has not been reported. The present study examined the involvement of profilin‐1 (Pfn‐1) and filamentous‐actin (F‐actin) in PGE₂‐induced hMSC migration and proliferation and its related signal pathways. PGE₂ (10^?6 M) increased both cell migration and proliferation, and also increased E‐type prostaglandin receptor 2 (EP2) mRNA expression, β‐arrestin‐1 phosphorylation, and c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (JNK) phosphorylation. Small interfering RNA (siRNA)‐mediated knockdown of β‐arrestin‐1 and JNK (‐1, ‐2, ‐3) inhibited PGE₂‐induced growth of hMSCs. PGE₂ also activated Pfn‐1, which was blocked by JNK siRNA, and induced F‐actin level and organization. Downregulation of Pfn‐1 by siRNA decreased the level and organization of F‐actin. In addition, specific siRNA for TRIO and F‐actin‐binding protein (TRIOBP) reduced the PGE₂‐induced increase in hMSC migration and proliferation. Together, these experimental data demonstrate that PGE₂ partially stimulates hMSCs migration and proliferation by interaction of Pfn‐1 and F‐actin via EP2 receptor‐dependent β‐arrestin‐1/JNK signaling pathways. J. Cell. Physiol. 226: 559–571, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Antiabsorptive effects of 16, 16 dimethyl prostaglandin E2 and isolated rat colon

Ulcerative colitis is distinguished by abundant prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) in the stools and by severe diarrhea. To determine whether luminal PGE₂ alters normal colonic absorption, Na⁺ and Cl⁻transport across isolated rat proximal colon were studied before and after 16, 16 dimethyl PGE₂ (dmPGE₂) addition to flux chambers. Luminal administration of dmPGE₂ significantly reduced the net mucosal to serosal fluxes of Na⁺ and Cl⁻. These antiabsorptive tive effects of dmPGE₂ on Na⁺ and Cl⁻ active transport were reflected by a reduced metabolic rate of colonic tissue slices incubated with dmPGE₂. Addition of dmPGE₂ significantly reduced oxidation of glucose by the colon. Structurally, dmPGE₂ reduced the length of colonic mucosal microvilli, thereby decreasing absorptive surface area. These results suggest that PGE₂ released into the colonic lumen of patients with ulcerative colitis exerts antiabsorptive effects on the colon and in this way contributes to the associated diarrhea.     

Correlation of prostaglandin E1 receptor binding with evoked uterine contraction: Modification by disulfide reduction

Both reversible (K₃ = 0.72 × 10⁸ 1/mole) and irreversible (K = 0.62 × 10⁸ 1/mole) binding of PGE₁-H³ was observed in rat uterus and was correlated with induced myometrial contraction. Each binding process consisted of a fast and slow component. In the binding that occurred prior to the onset of the uterine response (≤60 sec), the fast reversible component ( ) represented 80%, the slow reversible component ( ) represented 15% and the remaining 5% was associated with the combined fast and slow irreversible components ( and 155 sec respectively). Reversible and irreversible binding were PGE₁-H³ concentration-dependent, sensitive to competition by PGE₁ and modified by inhibitors of prostaglandin-induced uterine contraction. This modification was reflected as a significant reduction in the velocity of PGE₁-H³ binding. Only the above characteristics associated with PGE₁ binding fully satistified the physiological requirements of receptor interaction. In addition, a critical role for disulfide groups in the receptor binding site was indicated.     

Sodium transport by isolated bullfrog small intestine. Effect of Prostaglandin E1

Addition of 446 μM prostaglandin E₁ (PGE₁) to the serosal medium of isolated short-circuited bullfrog small intestine elicited small increases in transmural potential difference and short-circuit current while addition of PGE₁ to the mucosal medium caused no change in the electrical parameters. Addition of 100 μM indomethacin to the mucosal medium inhibited both potential difference and short-circuit current with a resultant increase in steady-state tissue resistance. In the presence of mucosal 100 μM indomethacin, serosal 60 μM PGE₁ markedly stimulated transmural potential difference and short-circuit current with a resultant decrease in steady-state tissue resistance. Serosal arachidonic acid (330μM) stimulated transmural potential difference and short-circuit current and this effect was abolished by the addition of 100 μM indomethacin to the mucosal medium. Serosal 60 μM PGE₁ only stimulated the M (mucosa) → S (serosa) unidirectional flux of sodium. These results strongly suggest that the PGE₁ action is mediated either via a series of metabolic reactions which possibly increase the permeability of the mucosal membrane to sodium or via direct stimulation of rheogenic sodium pump activity.     

16, 16 Dimethyl prostaglandin E2 reduces histamine release from the stomach and protects the gastric mucosal barrier altered by ethanol in neutral solution

Damage to the gastric mucosal barrier results in histamine release from intramucosal stores. Previous reports have shown that 16, 16 dimethyl prostaglandin E₂ (dm PGE₂) protects the stomach from injury by various damaging agents in either acidic or neutral solution. Furthermore histamine released in response to a damaging drug in an acidic medium was reduced by dm PGE₂. Using the Heidenhain pouch dog preparation, the present study examined the action of dm PGE₂ on ethanol-induced barrier breaking and histamine release in neutral solution. Topical ethanol treatment (15% w/v) damaged the gastric mucosal barrier as evidenced by increased net fluxes of Na+ and K+ and an increase in the histamine content of the fluid irrigating the Heidenhain pouch. Intravenous injection of dm PGE₂ in the doses of 0.01, 0.10 and 1.00 μg/kg one-half hour before ethanol administration significantly reduced the appearance of Na+, K+ and histamine. It is concluded that dm PGE₂ effectively protects the canine gastric mucosa from damaging agents in neutral solution as evidenced by a reduction in the luminal appearance of Na+, K+ and histamine.     

Interleukin-1 inhibits PGE2 binding to macrophage-like P388D1 cells by a cyclic AMP-independent process

The interaction between interleukin IL-1α and PGE₂ on P388D₂ on cells has been investigated. Preincubation of murine macrophage-like cells, P388D₁, with IL-1α (0–73 pM) reduced the binding of PGE₂ to these cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Scatchard analysis showed that IL-1α decreased the PGE₂ binding by lowering both the high and low affinity receptor binding capacities (from 0.31 ± 0.02 to 0.12 ± 0.01 fmol/10⁶ cells for the high affinity receptor binding sites and from 2.41 ± 0.12 to 1.51 ± 0.21 fmol/10⁶ cells for the low affinity receptor binding sites). However, the dissociation constants of the receptor of the IL-1α-treated cells remained unchanged. Inhibition of PGE₂ binding IL-1α did not involve changes in either protein phosphorylation or intracellular cyclic AMP levels. Our data clearly show that IL-1α inhibits the binding of PGE₂ to monocytes/macrophages and may thereby counter the immunosuppressive actions of PGE₂.     

Prostaglandin E2 receptor in the myometrium: distribution in subcellular fractions

[³H]Prostaglandin (PG) E₂ bound specifically to several subcellular fractions from bovine myometrium. The binding was temperature dependent, rapid, and reversible. PGE₂ and PGE₁ competed for the [³H]PGE₂ binding site. The PGs inhibited in the following decreasing order: PGE₂ = PGE₁ ? PGF_2α > PGA₂ > PGF_1β > PGB₂. No competitive effect could be found for oxytocin. Scatchard analysis of the binding data were interpreted as showing a single high-affinity binding constant. There was no difference in the binding constant between the various fractions. The average molar dissociation constant was 2.74 ± 0.14 × 10^?9. Quantitative differences in the maximum number of binding sites were observed between fractions. One plasma membrane fraction contained 21.4 ± 2.3 × 10^?11 and the sarcoplasmic reticulum contained 11.2 ± 0.8 × 10^?11 mol binding sites/g. The results suggest that there is a high-affinity PGE₂ receptor present in both plasma membrane and sarcoplasmic reticulum.     

Further evidence for lack of specific receptors for PGE2 in the rat ovary

Prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) seems to stimulate cAMP accumulation in ovaries of all mammals. While it acts through specific receptors in some species, our earlier observations (1) suggest absence of PGE₂ receptors in the rat ovary. In order to further substantiate this assumption we digested ovarian membranes from the bovine and the rat with various enzymes and measured cAMP after stimulation with PGE₂, NaF, and hCG. Pronase, trypsin, and phospholipase C abolished cAMP accumulation completely. Neuraminidase, β-galactosidase and phospholipase D did not interfere with cAMP formation. After treatment with phospholipase A₂ PGE₂-mediated cAMP accumulation was abolished in the bovine but not in the rat ovary. Formation of cAMP disappeared after hCG but not after NaF in both species. Furthermore specific binding of PGE₂ could not be demonstrated in phospholipase A₂-treated bovine ovaries. These findings are consistent with presence of specific PGE₂ receptors in the bovine and their absence in the rat ovary.     

Differential Effects of Prostaglandin E1 and Prostaglandin E2 on Growth and Differentiation of Murine Myeloid Leukemic Cell Line,M1

Effects of prostaglandins (PGs) of the E series on growth and differentiation of murine myeloid leukemic cell line M1 were studied. PGE₁, but not PGE₂, inhibited the growth of M1 cells. PGE₂ neither inhibited nor augmented the antiproliferative effect of PGE₁. PGE₁ augmented the differentiation of M1 cells into macrophage-like cells induced by interleukin 6. PGE₂, however, did not exhibit any effect on the differentiation. PGE₁ caused a marked increase in intracellular cAMP level in M1 cells, whereas PGE₂ had no effect. These results indicate that M1 cells are able to respond only to PGE₁. Radiolabeled PGE₁ binding experiments, however, revealed that there was no specific binding in M1 cells, suggesting that the cells express low numbers of receptors or very low affinity receptors specific for PGE₁. Stable agonists of PGI₂, iloprost, cicaprost or carbacyclin, also potently inhibited the growth of M1 cells. These findings suggest that PGE₁ as well as PGI₂ may play a role in the differentiation of monocyte-macrophage lineage cells.     

Inhibition by 16, 16-dimethyl PGE2 of ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage and leukotriene B4 and C4 formation

The effects of PGE₂ and its stable analogue, 16, 16 dimethyl PGE₂ (dmPGE₂) were investigated on ethanol-induced gastric mucosal haemorrhagic lesions and leukotriene formation in the rat. Exposure of the rat gastric mucosa to ethanol , produced a concentration-related increase in the mucosal formation of leukotriene B₄ (LTB₄) which was correlated with macroscopically-apparent haemorrhagic damage to the mucosa. Challenge with absolute ethanol likewise enhanced the mucosal formation of LTC₄ whereas the mucosal formation of 6-keto-PGF_1α was unaffected. Challenge of the rat gastric mucosa with ethanol induced a concentration-dependent increase in the formation of LTB₄ and LTC₄, but not 6-keto PGF_1α. Pretreatment with PGE₂ (200–500μg/kg p.o.) prevented the haemorrhagic mucosal damage induced by oral administration of absolute ethanol but not the increased formation of leukotrienes by the mucosa. In contrast, pretreatment with a high dose of dmPGE₂ (20μg/kg p.o.) prevented both the gastric mucosal lesions and the increase mucosal leukotriene formation. The differences in the effects of these prostaglandins may be related to the nature or degree of protection of the gastric mucosa. Thus, high doses of dmPGE₂ but not PGE₂ may protect the cells close the luminal surface of the mucosa and hence reduce the stimulation of leukotriene synthesis by these cells.     

Effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor and non-selective NSAIDs on Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis in Mongolian gerbils

Background. It is still a point of controversy whether Helicobacter pylori‐infected patients are more likely to develop mucosal damage while taking NSADIs. Selective cyclooxygenase (COX‐2) inhibitors may be associated with less severe gastric mucosal damage than conventional NSAIDs, but this association is undefined in H. pylori‐induced gastritis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of selective COX‐2 and nonselective NSAIDs on H. pylori‐induced gastritis. Methods. After intragastric administration of indomethacin, NS‐398 or vehicle alone, once daily for 5 days in H. pylori‐infected and uninfected Mongolian gerbils, we evaluated gastric mucosal damage, inflammatory cell infiltration and prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) concentration. We investigated whether H. pylori infection induced the COX‐2 expression. Results. In H. pylori‐uninfected groups, the indomethacin‐treated group showed the highest mucosal damage score and the lowest PGE₂ concentration. There was no difference in mucosal damage scores and PGE₂ concentration between NS‐398 and vehicle‐alone treated group. In H. pylori‐infected groups, there was no difference in mucosal damage scores, irrespective of the type of drugs administered. The indomethacin‐treated group showed the lowest PGE₂ concentration, similar to that of the NS‐398 and vehicle‐alone treated groups, both without H. pylori infection. Gastric neutrophil and monocyte infiltration scores were higher in H. pylori‐infected groups than in uninfected groups. However, there was no difference in these scores according to the type of drugs administered, within H. pylori‐infected or uninfected groups. COX‐2 protein expression was observed in H. pylori‐infected Mongolian gerbils but not in uninfected ones. Conclusions. Our animal study showed that H. pylori infection induced COX‐2 expression and increased prostaglandin concentration. Administration of NSAIDs decreased the prostaglandin concentration, but did not increase mucosal damage in H. pylori‐induced gastritis. Selective COX‐2 inhibitors, instead of conventional NSIADs, had no beneficial effect on preventing mucosal damage in H. pylori‐induced gastritis.