G146V mutation at the hinge region of actin reveals a myosin class-specific requirement of actin conformations for motility

The G146V mutation in actin is dominant lethal in yeast. G146V actin filaments bind cofilin only minimally, presumably because cofilin binding requires the large and small actin domains to twist with respect to one another around the hinge region containing Gly-146, and the mutation inhibits that twisting motion. A number of studies have suggested that force generation by myosin also requires actin filaments to undergo conformational changes. This prompted us to examine the effects of the G146V mutation on myosin motility. When compared with wild-type actin filaments, G146V filaments showed a 78% slower gliding velocity and a 70% smaller stall force on surfaces coated with skeletal heavy meromyosin. In contrast, the G146V mutation had no effect on either gliding velocity or stall force on myosin V surfaces. Kinetic analyses of actin-myosin binding and ATPase activity indicated that the weaker affinity of actin filaments for myosin heads carrying ADP, as well as reduced actin-activated ATPase activity, are the cause of the diminished motility seen with skeletal myosin. Interestingly, the G146V mutation disrupted cooperative binding of myosin II heads to actin filaments. These data suggest that myosin-induced conformational changes in the actin filaments, presumably around the hinge region, are involved in mediating the motility of skeletal myosin but not myosin V and that the specific structural requirements for the actin subunits, and thus the mechanism of motility, differ among myosin classes.     

An electromechanical model of myosin molecular motors

There is a long-running debate on the working mechanism of myosin molecular motors, which, by interacting with actin filaments, convert the chemical energy of ATP into a variety of mechanical work. After the development of technologies for observing and manipulating individual working molecules, experimental results negating the widely accepted 'lever-arm hypothesis' have been reported. In this paper, based on the experimental results so far accumulated, an alternative hypothesis is proposed, in which motor molecules are modelled as electromechanical components that interact with each other through electrostatic force. Electrostatic attractive force between myosin and actin is assumed to cause a conformational change in the myosin head during the attachment process. An elastic energy resulting from the conformational change then produces the power stroke. The energy released at the ATP hydrolysis is mainly used to detach the myosin head from actin filaments. The mechanism presented in this paper is compatible with the experimental results contradictory to the previous theories. It also explains the behavior of myosins V and VI, which are engaged in cellular transport and move processively along actin filaments.     

Recent X-ray Diffraction and Electron Microscope Studies of Striated Muscle

The sliding filament model for muscular contraction supposes that an appropriately directed force is developed between the actin and myosin filaments by some process in which the cross-bridges are involved. The cross-bridges between the filaments are believed to represent the parts of the myosin molecules which possess the active sites for ATPase activity and actin-binding ability, and project out sidewise from the backbone of the thick filaments. The arrangement of the cross-bridges is now being studied by improved low-angle X-ray diffraction techniques, which show that in a resting muscle, they are arranged approximately but not exactly in a helical pattern, and that there are other structural features of the thick filaments which give rise to additional long periodicities shown up by the X-ray diagram. The actin filaments also contain helically arranged subunits, and both the subunit repeat and the helical repeat are different from those in the myosin filaments. Diffraction diagrams can be obtained from muscles in rigor (when permanent attachment of the cross-bridges to the actin subunits takes place) and now, taking advantage of the great increase in the speed of recording, from actively contracting muscles. These show that changes in the arrangement of the cross-bridges are produced under both these conditions and are no doubt associated in contraction with the development of force. Thus configurational changes of the myosin component in muscle have been demonstrated: these take place without any significant over-all change in the length of the filaments.     

Muscle myosin filaments: cores, crowns and couplings

Myosin filaments in muscle, carrying the ATPase myosin heads that interact with actin filaments to produce force and movement, come in multiple varieties depending on species and functional need, but most are based on a common structural theme. The now successful journeys to solve the ultrastructures of many of these myosin filaments, at least at modest resolution, have not been without their false starts and erroneous sidetracks, but the picture now emerging is of both diversity in the rotational symmetries of different filaments and a degree of commonality in the way the myosin heads are organised in resting muscle. Some of the remaining differences may be associated with how the muscle is regulated. Several proteins in cardiac muscle myosin filaments can carry mutations associated with heart disease, so the elucidation of myosin filament structure to understand the effects of these mutations has a clear and topical clinical relevance.     

Myosin filament polymerization and depolymerization in a model of partial length adaptation in airway smooth muscle

Length adaptation in airway smooth muscle (ASM) is attributed to reorganization of the cytoskeleton, and in particular the contractile elements. However, a constantly changing lung volume with tidal breathing (hence changing ASM length) is likely to restrict full adaptation of ASM for force generation. There is likely to be continuous length adaptation of ASM between states of incomplete or partial length adaption. We propose a new model that assimilates findings on myosin filament polymerization/depolymerization, partial length adaptation, isometric force, and shortening velocity to describe this continuous length adaptation process. In this model, the ASM adapts to an optimal force-generating capacity in a repeating cycle of events. Initially the myosin filament, shortened by prior length changes, associates with two longer actin filaments. The actin filaments are located adjacent to the myosin filaments, such that all myosin heads overlap with actin to permit maximal cross-bridge cycling. Since in this model the actin filaments are usually longer than myosin filaments, the excess length of the actin filament is located randomly with respect to the myosin filament. Once activated, the myosin filament elongates by polymerization along the actin filaments, with the growth limited by the overlap of the actin filaments. During relaxation, the myosin filaments dissociate from the actin filaments, and then the cycle repeats. This process causes a gradual adaptation of force and instantaneous adaptation of shortening velocity. Good agreement is found between model simulations and the experimental data depicting the relationship between force development, myosin filament density, or shortening velocity and length.     

The Stepping Pattern of Myosin X Is Adapted for Processive Motility on Bundled Actin

Myosin X is a molecular motor that is adapted to select bundled actin filaments over single actin filaments for processive motility. Its unique form of motility suggests that myosin X's stepping mechanism takes advantage of the arrangement of actin filaments and the additional target binding sites found within a bundle. Here we use fluorescence imaging with one-nanometer accuracy to show that myosin X takes steps of ∼18 nm along a fascin-actin bundle. This step-size is well short of the 36-nm step-size observed in myosin V and myosin VI that corresponds to the actin pseudohelical repeat distance. Myosin X is able to walk along bundles with this step-size if it straddles two actin filaments, but would be quickly forced to spiral into the constrained interior of the bundle if it were to use only a single actin filament. We also demonstrate that myosin X takes many sideways steps as it walks along a bundle, suggesting that it can switch actin filament pairs within the bundle as it walks. Sideways steps to the left or the right occur on bundles with equal frequency, suggesting a degree of lateral flexibility such that the motor's working stroke does not bias it to the left or to the right. On single actin filaments, we find a broad mixture of 10-20-nm steps, which again falls short of the 36-nm actin repeat. Moreover, the motor leans to the right as it walks along single filaments, which may require myosin X to adopt strained configurations. As a control, we also tracked myosin V stepping along actin filaments and fascin-actin bundles. We find that myosin V follows a narrower path on both structures, walking primarily along one surface of an actin filament and following a single filament within a bundle while occasionally switching to neighboring filaments. Together, these results delineate some of the structural features of the motor and the track that allow myosin X to recognize actin filament bundles.     

The Role of Structural Dynamics of Actin in Class-Specific Myosin Motility

The structural dynamics of actin, including the tilting motion between the small and large domains, are essential for proper interactions with actin-binding proteins. Gly146 is situated at the hinge between the two domains, and we previously showed that a G146V mutation leads to severe motility defects in skeletal myosin but has no effect on motility of myosin V. The present study tested the hypothesis that G146V mutation impaired rotation between the two domains, leading to such functional defects. First, our study showed that depolymerization of G146V filaments was slower than that of wild-type filaments. This result is consistent with the distinction of structural states of G146V filaments from those of the wild type, considering the recent report that stabilization of actin filaments involves rotation of the two domains. Next, we measured intramolecular FRET efficiencies between two fluorophores in the two domains with or without skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin or the heavy meromyosin equivalent of myosin V in the presence of ATP. Single-molecule FRET measurements showed that the conformations of actin subunits of control and G146V actin filaments were different in the presence of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin. This altered conformation of G146V subunits may lead to motility defects in myosin II. In contrast, distributions of FRET efficiencies of control and G146V subunits were similar in the presence of myosin V, consistent with the lack of motility defects in G146V actin with myosin V. The distribution of FRET efficiencies in the presence of myosin V was different from that in the presence of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin, implying that the roles of actin conformation in myosin motility depend on the type of myosin.     

Class VI myosin moves processively along actin filaments backward with large steps.

Among a superfamily of myosin, class VI myosin moves actin filaments backwards. Here we show that myosin VI moves processively on actin filaments backwards with large ( approximately 36 nm) steps, nevertheless it has an extremely short neck domain. Myosin V also moves processively with large ( approximately 36 nm) steps and it is believed that myosin V strides along the actin helical repeat with its elongated neck domain that is critical for its processive movement with large steps. Myosin VI having a short neck cannot take this scenario. We found by electron microscopy that myosin VI cooperatively binds to an actin filament at approximately 36 nm intervals in the presence of ATP, raising a hypothesis that the binding of myosin VI evokes "hot spots" on actin filaments that attract myosin heads. Myosin VI may step on these "hot spots" on actin filaments in every helical pitch, thus producing processive movement with 36 nm steps.     

Regulation of melanosome movement in the cell cycle by reversible association with myosin V.

Previously, we have shown that melanosomes of Xenopus laevis melanophores are transported along both microtubules and actin filaments in a coordinated manner, and that myosin V is bound to purified melanosomes (Rogers, S., and V.I. Gelfand. 1998. Curr. Biol. 8:161-164). In the present study, we have demonstrated that myosin V is the actin-based motor responsible for melanosome transport. To examine whether myosin V was regulated in a cell cycle-dependent manner, purified melanosomes were treated with interphase- or metaphase-arrested Xenopus egg extracts and assayed for in vitro motility along Nitella actin filaments. Motility of organelles treated with mitotic extract was found to decrease dramatically, as compared with untreated or interphase extract-treated melanosomes. This mitotic inhibition of motility correlated with the dissociation of myosin V from melanosomes, but the activity of soluble motor remained unaffected. Furthermore, we find that myosin V heavy chain is highly phosphorylated in metaphase extracts versus interphase extracts. We conclude that organelle transport by myosin V is controlled by a cell cycle-regulated association of this motor to organelles, and that this binding is likely regulated by phosphorylation of myosin V during mitosis.     

Myosin IXb is a single-headed minus-end-directed processive motor

Myosin is an actin-based molecular motor that constitutes a diverse superfamily. In contrast to conventional myosin, which binds to actin for only a short time during cross-bridge cycling, recent studies have demonstrated that class V myosin moves along actin filaments for a long distance without dissociating. This would make it suitable for supporting cargo movement in cells. Because myosin V has a two-headed structure with an expanded neck domain, it has been postulated to 'walk' along the 36-nm helical repeat of the actin filament, with one head attached to the actin and leading the other head to the neighbouring helical pitch. Here, we report that myosin IXb, a single-headed myosin, moves processively on actin filaments. Furthermore, we found that myosin IXb is a minus-end-directed motor. In addition to class VI myosin, this is the first myosin superfamily member identified that moves in the reverse direction. The processive movement of the single-headed myosin IXb cannot be explained by a 'hand-over-hand' mechanism. This suggests that an alternative mechanism must be operating for the processive movement of single-headed myosin IXb.     

Rigor-like structures from muscle myosins reveal key mechanical elements in the transduction pathways of this allosteric motor

Unlike processive cellular motors such as myosin V, whose structure has recently been determined in a "rigor-like" conformation, myosin II from contracting muscle filaments necessarily spends most of its time detached from actin. By using squid and sea scallop sources, however, we have now obtained similar rigor-like atomic structures for muscle myosin heads (S1). The significance of the hallmark closed actin-binding cleft in these crystal structures is supported here by actin/S1-binding studies. These structures reveal how different duty ratios, and hence cellular functions, of the myosin isoforms may be accounted for, in part, on the basis of detailed differences in interdomain contacts. Moreover, the rigor-like position of switch II turns out to be unique for myosin V. The overall arrangements of subdomains in the motor are relatively conserved in each of the known contractile states, and we explore qualitatively the energetics of these states.     

Probing Muscle Myosin Motor Action: X-Ray (M3 and M6) Interference Measurements Report Motor Domain Not Lever Arm Movement

The key question in understanding how force and movement are produced in muscle concerns the nature of the cyclic interaction of myosin molecules with actin filaments. The lever arm of the globular head of each myosin molecule is thought in some way to swing axially on the actin-attached motor domain, thus propelling the actin filament past the myosin filament. Recent X-ray diffraction studies of vertebrate muscle, especially those involving the analysis of interference effects between myosin head arrays in the two halves of the thick filaments, have been claimed to prove that the lever arm moves at the same time as the sliding of actin and myosin filaments in response to muscle length or force steps. It was suggested that the sliding of myosin and actin filaments, the level of force produced and the lever arm angle are all directly coupled and that other models of lever arm movement will not fit the X-ray data. Here, we show that, in addition to interference across the A-band, which must be occurring, the observed meridional M3 and M6 X-ray intensity changes can all be explained very well by the changing diffraction effects during filament sliding caused by heads stereospecifically attached to actin moving axially relative to a population of detached or non-stereospecifically attached heads that remain fixed in position relative to the myosin filament backbone. Crucially, and contrary to previous interpretations, the X-ray interference results provide little direct information about the position of the myosin head lever arm; they are, in fact, reporting relative motor domain movements. The implications of the new interpretation are briefly assessed.     

Twirling of actin by myosins II and V observed via polarized TIRF in a modified gliding assay

The force generated between actin and myosin acts predominantly along the direction of the actin filament, resulting in relative sliding of the thick and thin filaments in muscle or transport of myosin cargos along actin tracks. Previous studies have also detected lateral forces or torques that are generated between actin and myosin, but the origin and biological role of these sideways forces is not known. Here we adapt an actin gliding filament assay to measure the rotation of an actin filament about its axis (“twirling”) as it is translocated by myosin. We quantify the rotation by determining the orientation of sparsely incorporated rhodamine-labeled actin monomers, using polarized total internal reflection microscopy. To determine the handedness of the filament rotation, linear incident polarizations in between the standard s- and p-polarizations were generated, decreasing the ambiguity of our probe orientation measurement fourfold. We found that whole myosin II and myosin V both twirl actin with a relatively long (∼1 μm), left-handed pitch that is insensitive to myosin concentration, filament length, and filament velocity.     

Distribution of myosin and relationship to actin organization in cortical and subcortical areas of antibody-labelled, quick-frozen, deep-etched fibroblast cytoskeletons

In this study I describe the ultrastructural distribution of myosin in cortical and subcortical areas of antibody-labelled, quick-frozen fibroblasts. In many cells myosin was present in small variably spaced and sized (0.23-0.39 micron long), nonaligned patches, while in other cells much larger periodically spaced patches of more uniform length (0.27 micron) were found. In all regions of the cytoskeleton myosin was found, primarily on linear bundles of actin filaments running parallel to the cell's long axis. Myosin was absent from single actin filaments, actin filaments perpendicular to actin bundles aligned with the cell's long axis, and actin filaments, such as geodome vertices and parts of the cortex, which had a complex interwoven appearance. These data indicate that in motile non-muscle cells myosin exerts force only in a unidirectional manner. Recognisable myosin filaments were never observed even in cells incubated either in N-ethylmaleimide or sodium azide. The presence of myosin in, and almost to the very edge of, the cortex suggests that the cellular control of actomyosin based movement is direct and over short-range distances. Large numbers of small cross-linking filaments were found in association with cortical and subcortical actin. Their relationship to myosin and overall actin geometry is discussed.     

Actin cross-linking and inhibition of the actomyosin motor.

Intrastrand cross-linking of actin filaments by ANP, N-(4-azido-2-nitrophenyl) putrescine, between Gln-41 in subdomain 2 and Cys-374 at the C-terminus, was shown to inhibit force generation with myosin in the in vitro motility assays [Kim et al. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 17801-17809]. To clarify the immobilization of which of these two sites inhibits the actomyosin motor, the properties of actins with partially overlapping cross-linked sites were examined. pPDM (N,N'-p-phenylenedimaleimide) and ABP [N-(4-azidobenzoyl) putrescine] were used to obtain actin filaments cross-linked ( approximately 50%) between Cys-374 and Lys-191 (interstrand) and Gln-41 and Lys-113 (intrastrand), respectively. ANP, ABP, and pPDM cross-linked filaments showed similar inhibition of their sliding speeds and force generation with myosin ( approximately 25%) in the in vitro motility assays. In analogy to ANP cross-linking of actin, pPDM and ABP cross-linkings did not change the strong S1 binding to actin and the V(max) and K(m) parameters of actomyosin ATPase. The similar effects of these three cross-linkings reveal the tight coupling between structural elements of the subdomain 2/subdomain 1 interface and show the importance of its dynamic flexibility to force generation with myosin. The possibility that actin cross-linkings inhibit rate-limiting steps in motion and force generation during myosin cross-bridge cycle was tested in stopped-flow experiments. Measurements of the rates of mantADP release from actoS1 and ATP-induced dissociation of actoS1 did not reveal any differences between un-cross-linked and ANP cross-linked actin in these complexes. These findings are discussed in terms of the uncoupling between force generation and other aspects of actomyosin interactions due to a constrained dynamic flexibility of the subdomain 2/subdomain 1 interface in cross-linked actin filaments.     

Forces measured with micro-fabricated cantilevers during actomyosin interactions produced by filaments containing different myosin isoforms and loop 1 structures

Background

There is evidence that the actin-activated ATP kinetics and the mechanical work produced by muscle myosin molecules are regulated by two surface loops, located near the ATP binding pocket (loop 1), and in a region that interfaces with actin (loop 2). These loops regulate force and velocity of contraction, and have been investigated mostly in single molecules. There is a lack of information of the work produced by myosin molecules ordered in filaments and working cooperatively, which is the actual muscle environment.

Methods

We use micro-fabricated cantilevers to measure forces produced by myosin filaments isolated from mollusk muscles, skeletal muscles, and smooth muscles containing variations in the structure of loop 1 (tonic and phasic myosins). We complemented the experiments with in-vitro assays to measure the velocity of actin motility.

Results

Smooth muscle myosin filaments produced more force than skeletal and mollusk myosin filaments when normalized per filament overlap. Skeletal muscle myosin propelled actin filaments in a higher sliding velocity than smooth muscle myosin. The values for force and velocity were consistent with previous studies using myosin molecules, and suggest a close correlation with the myosin isoform and structure of surface loop 1.

General significance

The technique using micro-fabricated cantilevers to measure force of filaments allows for the investigation of the relation between myosin structure and contractility, allowing experiments to be conducted with an array of different myosin isoforms. Using the technique we observed that the work produced by myosin molecules is regulated by amino-acid sequences aligned in specific loops.     

Movement of myosin fragments in vitro: domains involved in force production

We have used the Nitella-based movement assay to localize the site of force production in myosin. Methods were developed to use nonfilamentous myosin or proteolytic fragments of myosin in place of the thick filaments used in the original assay. In the experiments described here, the tail of myosin or its subfragments is anchored via antibodies to the surface of small particles. Nonfilamentous myosin or its subfragments move along Nitella actin cables at speeds similar to those obtained with filamentous myosin. We generated short HMM, a myosin fragment containing the heads and only 400 A of the tail. Although short HMM lacks the "hinge" region proposed by Harrington to be the site of force generation, and is incapable of forming thick filaments, it moves along actin at speeds above 1 micron/sec. Therefore, neither a thick filament nor the carboxy-terminal 1100 A of the tail is required for movement along actin. The results indicate that force production occurs in or near the myosin heads.     

An electrodynamic (moving field) theory of muscular contraction

It is proposed that muscular contraction is the result of electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged areas on actin and myosin filaments. On the latter charged areas are assumed to be moving, always a step ahead of stationary charged areas on actin filaments, the moving charges pulling the stationary charges, hence the actin filaments, with them. It may be noted that electric motors in human technology work on a similar moving field principle. On myosin filaments minute charged areas are assumed to spiral along the surface of the filament on 2 or 3-start helical paths, probably the latter, thus engaging with adjacent actin filaments in a screw-like fashion. The spiralling charges follow each other like peristaltic waves, engaging with an increasing number of static fields on actin filaments as interdigitation proceeds. The source of the electrostatic charges are assumed to be minute voltaic cells, one associated with every myosin head. It is suggested that they could be calcium-magnesium cells, calcium adsorbed by troponin complexes on actin filaments constituting one electrode, and magnesium complexed with ATP on myosin filaments the other. The potential difference that has to exist between actin and myosin filaments, if muscles are to be capable of developing a maximum force of 20 N per cm2, is calculated at about 50 mV.     

Symposium 4: Dynamics of the Neuronal Cytoskeleton. Actin‐based vesicle transport in nerve cell extracts: implications for neurodegenerative diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases may result in part from defects in motor‐driven vesicle transport in neuronal cells. Myosin‐V, an actin‐based motor that is highly enriched in the brain, mediates the movement of vesicles on cortical actin filaments. Recent evidence suggests that the globular tail of myosin‐V interacts with the microtubule‐based motor, kinesin, to form a ‘hetero‐motor’ complex on vesicles. The complex of these two motors, one microtubule‐based and the other actin‐based, facilitates the movement of vesicles from microtubules to actin filaments. Based on our studies of vesicle transport by these two motors in extracts of squid neurons, we hypothesize that one of the functions of the tail–tail interaction is to provide feedback between the two proteins to allow seamless transition of vesicles from microtubules to actin filaments. To study the interactions of the globular tail domain of myosin‐V to kinesin and to neuronal vesicles, we used a GST‐tagged globular tail fragment in motility assays. The MyoV tail fragment inhibited vesicle transport by 81–91% and thereby exhibited a dominant negative effect. These data show that the recombinant protein blocked the activity of native myosin‐V presumably by binding to vesicles and competing away the native myosin‐V motors. The GST‐MyoV‐tail fragment pulled down kinesin by immunoprecipitation from squid brain homogenates and therefore it exhibited binding properties of native myosin‐V. These data show that the headless myosin‐V fragment is an effective inhibitor of vesicle transport in cell extracts. These studies support the hypothesis that tail–tail interactions may be a mechanism for feedback between myosin‐V and kinesin to allow transition of vesicles from microtubules to actin filaments. Acknowledgements: Supported by NSF grant MCB9974709.     

Polarized actin bundles formed by human fascin-1: their sliding and disassembly on myosin II and myosin V in vitro

Fascin-1 is a putative bundling factor of actin filaments in the filopodia of neuronal growth cones. Here, we examined the structure of the actin bundle formed by human fascin-1 (actin/fascin bundle), and its mode of interaction with myosin in vitro. The distance between cross-linked filaments in the actin/bundle was 8-9 nm, and the bundle showed the transverse periodicity of 36 nm perpendicular to the bundle axis, which was confirmed by electron microscopy. Decoration of the actin/fascin bundle with heavy meromyosin revealed that the arrowheads of filaments in the bundle pointed in the same direction, indicating that the bundle has polarity. This result suggested that fascin-1 plays an essential role in polarity of actin bundles in filopodia. In the in vitro motility assay, actin/fascin bundles slid as fast as single actin filaments on myosin II and myosin V. When myosin was attached to the surface at high density, the actin/fascin bundle disassembled to single filaments at the pointed end of the bundle during sliding. These results suggest that myosins may drive filopodial actin bundles backward by interacting with actin filaments on the surface, and may induce disassembly of the bundle at the basal region of filopodia.