Sex and the Single Cell. I. on the Action of Major Loci Affecting Sex Determination in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster is under the control of the X chromosome:autosome ratio and at least four major regulatory genes: transformer (tra), transformer-2 (tra-2), doublesex (dsx) and intersex (ix). Attention is focused here on the roles of these four loci in sex determination. By examining the sexual phenotype of clones of homozygous mutant cells produced by mitotic recombination in flies heterozygous for a given recessive sex-determination mutant, we have shown that the tra, tra-2 and dsx loci determine sex in a cell-autonomous manner. The effect of removing the wild-type allele of each locus (by mitotic recombination) at a number of times during development has been used to determine when the wild-type alleles of the tra, tra-2 and dsx loci have been transcribed sufficiently to support normal sexual development. The wild-type alleles of all three loci are needed into the early pupal period for normal sex determination in the cells that produce the sexually dimorphic (in pigmentation) cuticle of the fifth and sixth dorsal abdominal segments. tra⁺ and tra-2⁺ cease being needed shortly before the termination of cell division in the abdomen, whereas dsx⁺ is required at least until the end of division. By contrast, in the foreleg, the wild-type alleles of tra⁺ and tra-2⁺ have functioned sufficiently for normal sexual differentiation to occur by about 24 to 48 hours before pupariation, but dsx⁺ is required in the foreleg at least until pupariation.——A comparison of the phenotypes produced in mutant/deficiency and homozygous mutant-bearing flies shows that dsx, tra-2 and tra mutants result in a loss of wild-type function and probably represent null alleles at these genes.—All possible homozygous doublemutant combinations of ix, tra-2 and dsx have been constructed and reveal a clear pattern of epistasis: dsx > tra, tra-2 > ix. We conclude that these genes function in a single pathway that determines sex. The data suggest that these mutants are major regulatory loci that control the batteries of genes necessary for the development of many, and perhaps all, secondary sexual characteristics.—The striking similarities between the properties of these loci and those of the homeotic loci that determine segmental and subsegmental specialization during development suggest that the basic mechanisms of regulation are the same in the two situations. The phenotypes and interactions of these sex-determination mutants provide the basis for the model of how the wild-type alleles of these loci act together to effect normal sex determination. Implications of these observations for the function of other homeotic loci are discussed.     

Evolution of sex comb from the primitive bristle pattern in drosophila is associated with modification in the developmental regulatory protein dachshund

Sex comb is a recently evolved male specific character confined to the Sophophoran group of Drosophila. Such innovations in phenotypes as Waddington proposed, are, outcome of “canalization” in developmental pathways that occur due to mutations creating “choice points” in genetic regulatory pathways. Our interest in the present study is to understand the shifts in genetic network, which has lead to the origin of sex comb from the basic bristle pattern that is seen in rest of the members of Drosophilidae. Here we have made a comparative analysis of expression of some of the key regulators of sex comb morphogenesis, between D. melanogaster and a group of selected species, which primitively lack sex comb. Sex combs reduced (Scr), dachshund (dac), and bric‐a‐brac (bab) gene expression were studied. We show that, primitive bristle pattern is marked by a strikingly down regulated expression of Sex combs reduced in the first tarsal segment of the prothoracic leg discs of male flies. Further a remarkable change with respect to Dachshund, an activator of sex combs reduced gene in the sex comb regulatory pathway, is seen. This is attributed to changes in DAC protein that might have taken place between the two groups of species. bric‐a‐brac does not reveal any significant expression modulation between the sex comb bearing and the primitive patterned species. Earlier works had shown that within the Sophophoran group, dynamic changes in SCR expression is responsible for the diversity seen in sex comb morphology, where as no such variation is witnessed with respect to DAC expression. Our findings have demonstrated that the scenario is different between the group primitively lacking sex comb and D. melanogaster wherein an obvious change in the protein has taken place. genesis 51:97–109, 2013, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Sex-specific expression of a HOX gene associated with rapid morphological evolution

Animal diversity is shaped by the origin and diversification of new morphological structures. Many examples of evolutionary innovations are provided by male-specific traits involved in mating and sexual selection. The origin of new sex-specific characters requires the evolution of new regulatory interactions between sex-determining genes and genes that control spatial patterning and cell differentiation. Here, we show that sex-specific regulation of the HOX gene Sex combs reduced (Scr) is associated with the origin and evolution of the Drosophila sex comb — a novel and rapidly diversifying male-specific organ. In species that primitively lack sex combs, Scr expression shows little spatial modulation, whereas in species that have sex combs, Scr is upregulated in the presumptive sex comb region and is frequently sexually dimorphic. Phylogenetic analysis shows that sex-specific regulation of Scr has been gained and lost multiple times in Drosophila evolution and correlates with convergent origin of similar sex comb morphologies in several independent lineages. Some of these transitions occurred on microevolutionary timescales, indicating that HOX gene expression can evolve with surprising ease. This is the first example of a sex-specific regulation of a HOX gene contributing to the development and evolution of a secondary sexual trait.     

The role of doublesex in the evolution of exaggerated horns in the Japanese rhinoceros beetle

Male‐specific exaggerated horns are an evolutionary novelty and have diverged rapidly via intrasexual selection. Here, we investigated the function of the conserved sex‐determination gene doublesex (dsx) in the Japanese rhinoceros beetle (Trypoxylus dichotomus) using RNA interference (RNAi). Our results show that the sex‐specific T. dichotomus dsx isoforms have an antagonistic function for head horn formation and only the male isoform has a role for thoracic horn formation. These results indicate that the novel sex‐specific regulation of dsx during horn morphogenesis might have been the key evolutionary developmental event at the transition from sexually monomorphic to sexually dimorphic horns.     

Sex-specific repression of dachshund is required for Drosophila sex comb development

The origin of new morphological structures requires the establishment of new genetic regulatory circuits to control their development, from initial specification to terminal differentiation. The upstream regulatory genes are usually the first to be identified, while the mechanisms that translate novel regulatory information into phenotypic diversity often remain obscure. In particular, elaborate sex-specific structures that have evolved in many animal lineages are inevitably controlled by sex-determining genes, but the genetic basis of sexually dimorphic cell differentiation is rarely understood. In this report, we examine the role of dachshund (dac), a gene with a deeply conserved function in sensory organ and appendage development, in the sex comb, a recently evolved male-specific structure found in some Drosophila species. We show that dac acts during metamorphosis to restrict sex comb development to the appropriate leg region. Localized repression of dac by the sex determination pathway is necessary for male-specific morphogenesis of sex comb bristles. This pupal function of dac is separate from its earlier role in leg patterning, and Dac at this stage is not dependent on the pupal expression of Distalless (Dll), the main regulator of dac during the larval period. Dll acts in the epithelial cells surrounding the sex comb during pupal development to promote sex comb rotation, a complex cellular process driven by coordinated cell rearrangement. Our results show that genes with well-conserved developmental functions can be re-used at later stages in development to regulate more recently evolved traits. This mode of gene co-option may be an important driver of evolutionary innovations.     

How Drosophila change their combs: the Hox gene Sex combs reduced and sex comb variation among Sophophora species

SUMMARY Identification of the events responsible for rapid morphological variation during evolution can help understand how developmental processes are changed by genetic modifications and thus produce diverse body features and shapes. Sex combs, a sexually dimorphic structure, show considerable variation in morphology and numbers among males from related species of Sophophora , a subgenus of Drosophila . To address which evolutionary changes in developmental processes underlie this diversity, we first analyzed the genetic network that controls morphogenesis of a single sex comb in the model D. melanogaster . We show that it depends on positive and negative regulatory inputs from proximo-distal identity specifying genes, including dachshund, bric à brac , and sex combs distal . All contribute to spatial regulation of the Hox gene Sex combs reduced (Scr ), which is crucial for comb formation. We next analyzed the expression of these genes in sexually dimorphic species with different comb numbers. Only Scr shows considerable expression plasticity, which is correlated with comb number variation in these species. We suggest that differences in comb numbers reflect changes of Scr expression in tarsus primordia, and discuss how initial comb formation could have occurred in an ancestral Sophophora fly following regulatory modifications of developmental programs both parallel to and downstream of Scr .     

Sxl in the germline of Drosophila: A target for somatic late induction

In Drosophila, the sex of germ cells is determined by autonomous and inductive signals. Somatic inductive signals can drive XX germ cells into oogenesis or into spermatogenesis. An autonomous signal makes XY germ cells male and unresponsive to sex determination by induction. The elements forming the X:A ratio in the soma and the genes tra, tra2, dsx, and ix that determine the sex of somatic cells have no similar role in the germline. The gene Sxl, however, is required for female differentiation of somatic and germ cells. Inductive signals that are dependent on somatic tra and dsx expression already affect the sex-specific development of germ cells of first instar larvae. At this early stage, however, germline expression of Sxl does not appear to affect the sexual characteristics of germ cells. Since inductive signals dependent on tra and dsx nevertheless influence the choice of sex-specific splicing of Sxl, it can be concluded that Sxl is a target of the inductive signal, but that its product is required late for oogenesis. Other genes must therefore control the early sexual dimorphism of larval germ cells. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Autosomal mutations that interfere with sex determination in somatic cells of Drosophila have no direct effect on the germline

In Drosophila, mutations at the transformer-2, the double-sex, or the intersex loci interfere with the normal sexual development of somatic cells. In order to study the effect of mutations at these loci on germ cell development, mutant germ cells were introduced into normal female or normal male gonads either by pole cell transplantation or by induced mitotic recombination, and their ability to give rise to functional gametes was tested. In contrast to the effects seen in mutant somatic cells, the mutant germ cells ($\text{dsx}\text{dsx}\text{,}\text{dsx}{}^{\mathrm{D}}\text{+}\text{,}\text{dsx}{}^{\mathrm{d}}\text{dsx}\text{,}\text{tra-2}\text{tra-2}\text{,}\text{ix}\text{ix}$) developed normally according to their chromosomal sex, and no sexual transformations of germ cells were observed. In combination with the results of J. L. Marsh and E. Wieschaus (1978, Nature (London)272, 249–251) concerning the transformer locus, it seems that the four autosomal loci known to be involved in sex determination of somatic cells have no important role in the sexual development of the germline. The results are discussed with respect to sex determination in the germline of Drosophila and are compared to observations made on similar mutations in other animal species.     

Modular genetic control of sexually dimorphic behaviors

Sex hormones such as estrogen and testosterone are essential for sexually dimorphic behaviors in vertebrates. However, the hormone-activated molecular mechanisms that control the development and function of the underlying neural circuits remain poorly defined. We have identified numerous sexually dimorphic gene expression patterns in the adult mouse hypothalamus and amygdala. We find that adult sex hormones regulate these expression patterns in a sex-specific, regionally restricted manner, suggesting that these genes regulate sex typical behaviors. Indeed, we find that mice with targeted disruptions of each of four of these genes (Brs3, Cckar, Irs4, Sytl4) exhibit extremely specific deficits in sex specific behaviors, with single genes controlling the pattern or extent of male sexual behavior, male aggression, maternal behavior, or female sexual behavior. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that various components of sexually dimorphic behaviors are governed by separable genetic programs.     

Abdominal-B is essential for proper sexually dimorphic development of the Drosophila gonad

Sexual dimorphism requires the integration of positional information in the embryo with the sex determination pathway. Homeotic genes are a major source of positional information responsible for patterning along the anterior-posterior axis in embryonic development, and are likely to play a critical role in sexual dimorphism. Here, we investigate the role of homeotic genes in the sexually dimorphic development of the gonad in Drosophila. We have found that Abdominal-B (ABD-B) is expressed in a sexually dimorphic manner in the embryonic gonad. Furthermore, Abd-B is necessary and sufficient for specification of a sexually dimorphic cell type, the male-specific somatic gonadal precursors (msSGPs). In Abd-B mutants, the msSGPs are not specified and male gonads now resemble female gonads with respect to these cells. Ectopic expression of Abd-B is sufficient to induce formation of extra msSGPs in additional segments of the embryo. Abd-B works together with abdominal-A to pattern the non-sexually dimorphic somatic gonad in both sexes, while Abd-B alone specifies the msSGPs. Our results indicate that Abd-B acts at multiple levels to regulate gonad development and that Abd-B class homeotic genes are conserved factors in establishing gonad sexual dimorphism in diverse species.     

Sex determination and dosage compensation in Drosophila melanogaster: production of male clones in XX females

Sex determination and dosage compensation in Drosophila are implemented by the ratio of X-chromosomes to sets of autosomes (X:A ratio). Our aim was to change this X:A ratio during development, and to assess the response of the affected cells in sexually dimorphic structures. For this purpose, clones of XO constitution were produced in female embryos and larvae of two genotypes in which almost the entire euchromatic arm of one X-chromosome was translocated to the third chromosome. Genotype I was heterozygous for the X-linked recessive mutations Sxl^fLS, genotype II was homozygous for Sxl⁺. The Sxl⁺ gene (sex-lethal) is involved in mediating sex determination and dosage compensation. In genotype I (Sxl^fLS), male clones could be generated up to 48 h in genitalia and analia, up to 72 h in the sex comb region and up to 96 h in 5th and 6th tergites. In genotype II (Sxl⁺), male clones only appeared in the tergites, and only up to 24 h. The difference in these results is ascribed to the presence of Sxl^fLS in genotype I: when homozygous, this mutation causes XX clones to differentiate male structures; most of the male clones produced in genotype I must therefore be XX. In contrast, male clones produced in genotype II must be XO. Since these were only found when generated in embryos we conclude that the X:A ratio expresses itself autonomously in clones by setting the state of activity of the Sxl gene around blastoderm stage. Once this is achieved, the X:A signal is no longer needed, and the state of activity of the Sxl⁺ gene determines sex and dosage compensation.