WAVE2 targeting to phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate mediated by insulin receptor substrate p53 through a complex with WAVE2

Membrane targeting of WAVE2 along microtubules to phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP₃) in response to an extracellular stimulus requires Rac1, Pak1, stathmin, and EB1. However, whether WAVE2 interacts directly with PIP₃ or not remains unclear. We demonstrate that insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) induces WAVE2 membrane targeting, accompanied by phosphorylation of Pak1 at serine 199/204 (Ser199/204) and stathmin at Ser38 in the inner cytoplasmic region. This is spatially independent of the membrane region where the IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) is locally activated. WAVE2, phosphorylated Pak1, and phosphorylated stathmin located at the microtubule ends began to accumulate at the leading edge of cells in close proximity to PIP₃ that was produced in a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase)-dependent manner. The PIP₃-beads binding assay revealed that insulin receptor substrate p53 (IRSp53) and actin rather than WAVE2 bound to PIP₃. IRSp53 constitutively associated with WAVE2 and these two proteins colocalized with PIP₃ at the leading edge after IGF-I stimulation. Suppression of IRSp53 expression by two independent small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) completely inhibited IGF-I-induced membrane targeting and local accumulation of WAVE2 at the leading edge of cells. We propose that IRSp53 constitutively forms a complex with WAVE2 and is crucial for membrane targeting followed by local accumulation of WAVE2 at the leading edge of cells through linking WAVE2 to PIP₃ that is produced near locally activated IGF-IR in response to IGF-I.     

Directional control of WAVE2 membrane targeting by EB1 and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate

Membrane targeting of WAVE2 along microtubules is mediated by a motor protein kinesin and requires Pak1, a downstream effector of Rac1. However, the mechanism by which WAVE2 targeting to the leading edge is directionally controlled remains largely unknown. Here we demonstrate that EB1, a microtubule plus-end-binding protein, constitutively associates with stathmin, a microtubule-destabilizing protein, in human breast cancer cells. Stimulation of the cells with insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) induced Pak1-dependent binding of the EB1–stathmin complex to microtubules that bear WAVE2 and colocalization of the complex with WAVE2 at the leading edge. Depletion of EB1 by small interfering RNA (siRNA) abrogated the IGF-I-induced WAVE2 targeting and stathmin binding to microtubules. On the other hand, chemotaxis chamber assays indicated that the IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) was locally activated in the region facing toward IGF-I. In addition, IGF-I caused phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase)-dependent production of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP₃) near activated IGF-IR and WAVE2 colocalization with it. Collectively, WAVE2-membrane targeting is directionally controlled by binding of the EB1–stathmin complex to WAVE2-bearing microtubules and by the interaction between WAVE2 and PIP₃ produced near IGF-IR that is locally activated by IGF-I.     

Differential roles of WAVE1 and WAVE2 in dorsal and peripheral ruffle formation for fibroblast cell migration

Cell migration is driven by actin polymerization at the leading edge of lamellipodia, where WASP family verprolin-homologous proteins (WAVEs) activate Arp2/3 complex. When fibroblasts are stimulated with PDGF, formation of peripheral ruffles precedes that of dorsal ruffles in lamellipodia. Here, we show that WAVE2 deficiency impairs peripheral ruffle formation and WAVE1 deficiency impairs dorsal ruffle formation. During directed cell migration in the absence of extracellular matrix (ECM), cells migrate with peripheral ruffles at the leading edge and WAVE2, but not WAVE1, is essential. In contrast, both WAVE1 and WAVE2 are essential for invading migration into ECM, suggesting that the leading edge in ECM has characteristics of both ruffles. WAVE1 is colocalized with ECM-degrading enzyme MMP-2 in dorsal ruffles, and WAVE1-, but not WAVE2-, dependent migration requires MMP activity. Thus, WAVE2 is essential for leading edge extension for directed migration in general and WAVE1 is essential in MMP-dependent migration in ECM.     

WAVE2, N-WASP, and Mena facilitate cell invasion via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent local accumulation of actin filaments

Cell migration is accomplished by the formation of cellular protrusions such as lamellipodia and filopodia. These protrusions result from actin filament (F-actin) rearrangement at the cell cortex by WASP/WAVE family proteins and Drosophila enabled (Ena)/vasodilator-stimulated factor proteins. However, the role of each of these actin cytoskeletal regulatory proteins in the regulation of three-dimensional cell invasion remains to be clarified. We found that platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) induces invasion of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells through invasion chamber membrane pores. This invasion was accompanied by intensive F-actin accumulation at the sites of cell infiltration. After PDGF stimulation, WAVE2, N-WASP, and a mammalian Ena (Mena) colocalized with F-actin at the sites of cell infiltration in a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent manner. Depletion of WAVE2, N-WASP, or Mena by RNA interference (RNAi) abrogated both cell invasion and intensive F-actin accumulation at the invasion site. These results indicate that by mediating intensive F-actin accumulation at the sites of cell infiltration, WAVE2, N-WASP, and Mena are crucial for PI3K-dependent cell invasion induced by PDGF.     

Modulation of epithelial tubule formation by Rho kinase

We have developed a model system for studying integrin regulation of mammalian epithelial tubule formation. Application of collagen gel overlays to Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells induced coordinated disassembly of junctional complexes that was accompanied by lamellipodia formation and cell rearrangement (termed epithelial remodeling). In this study, we present evidence that the Rho signal transduction pathway regulates epithelial remodeling and tubule formation. Incubation of MDCK cells with collagen gel overlays facilitated formation of migrating lamellipodia with membrane-associated actin. Inhibitors of myosin II and actin prevented lamellipodia formation, which suggests that actomyosin function was involved in regulation of epithelial remodeling. To determine this, changes in myosin II distribution, function, and phosphorylation were studied during epithelial tubule biogenesis. Myosin II colocalized with actin at the leading edge of lamellipodia thereby providing evidence that myosin is important in epithelial remodeling. This possibility is supported by observations that inhibition of Rho kinase, a regulator of myosin II function, alters formation of lamellipodia and results in attenuated epithelial tubule development. These data and those demonstrating myosin regulatory light-chain phosphorylation at the leading edge of lamellipodia strongly suggest that Rho kinase and myosin II are important modulators of epithelial remodeling. They support a hypothesis that the Rho signal transduction pathway plays a significant role in regulation of epithelial tubule formation. signaling pathway; polarity     

Regulation of sperm motility by PIP2(4,5) and actin polymerization

Actin polymerization and development of hyperactivated (HA) motility are two processes that take place during sperm capacitation. In previous studies, we demonstrated that the increase in F-actin during capacitation depends upon inactivation of the actin severing protein, gelsolin, by its binding to phosphatydilinositol-4, 5-bisphosphate (PIP₂). Here, we showed for the first time the involvement of PIP₂/gelsolin in human sperm motility before and during capacitation. Activation of gelsolin by causing its release from PIP₂ inhibited sperm motility, which could be restored by adding PIP₂ to the cells. Reduction of PIP₂ synthesis inhibited actin polymerization and motility, and increasing PIP₂ synthesis enhanced these activities. Furthermore, sperm demonstrating low motility contained low levels of PIP₂ and F-actin. During capacitation there was an increase in PIP₂ and F-actin levels in the sperm head and a decrease in the tail. In sperm with high motility, gelsolin was mainly localized to the sperm head before capacitation, whereas in low motility sperm, most of the gelsolin was localized to the tail before capacitation and translocated to the head during capacitation. We also showed that phosphorylation of gelsolin on tyrosine-438 depends on its binding to PIP₂. Activation of phospholipase C by Ca²⁺-ionophore or by activating the epidermal-growth-factor-receptor inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of gelsolin. In conclusion, the data indicate that the increase of PIP₂ and/or F-actin in the head during capacitation enhances gelsolin translocation to the head. As a result the decrease of gelsolin in the tail allows keeping high level of F-actin in the tail, which is essential for the development of HA motility.     

Leep1 interacts with PIP3 and the Scar/WAVE complex to regulate cell migration and macropinocytosis

Polarity is essential for diverse functions in many cell types. Establishing polarity requires targeting a network of specific signaling and cytoskeleton molecules to different subregions of the cell, yet the full complement of polarity regulators and how their activities are integrated over space and time to form morphologically and functionally distinct domains remain to be uncovered. Here, by using the model system Dictyostelium and exploiting the characteristic chemoattractant-stimulated translocation of polarly distributed molecules, we developed a proteomic screening approach, through which we identified a leucine-rich repeat domain–containing protein we named Leep1 as a novel polarity regulator. We combined imaging, biochemical, and phenotypic analyses to demonstrate that Leep1 localizes selectively at the leading edge of cells by binding to PIP₃, where it modulates pseudopod and macropinocytic cup dynamics by negatively regulating the Scar/WAVE complex. The spatiotemporal coordination of PIP₃ signaling, Leep1, and the Scar/WAVE complex provides a cellular mechanism for organizing protrusive structures at the leading edge.     

A temporal model of cofilin regulation and the early peak of actin barbed ends in invasive tumor cells

Cofilin is an important regulator of actin polymerization, cell migration, and chemotaxis. Recent experimental data on mammary carcinoma cells reveal that stimulation by epidermal growth factor (EGF) generates a pool of active cofilin that results in a peak of actin filament barbed ends on the timescale of 1 min. Here, we present results of a mathematical model for the dynamics of cofilin and its transition between several pools in response to EGF stimulation. We describe the interactions of phospholipase C, membrane lipids (PIP₂), and cofilin bound to PIP₂ and to F-actin, as well as diffusible cofilin in active G-actin-monomer-bound or phosphorylated states. We consider a simplified representation in which the thin cell edge (lamellipod) and the cell interior are represented by two compartments that are linked by diffusion. We demonstrate that a high basal level of active cofilin stored by binding to PIP₂, as well as the highly enriched local milieu of F-actin at the cell edge, is essential to capture the EGF-induced barbed-end amplification observed experimentally.     

MARCKS regulates lamellipodia formation induced by IGF‐I via association with PIP2 and β‐actin at membrane microdomains

Myristoylated alanine‐rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) is considered to participate in formation of F‐actin‐based lamellipodia, which represents the first stage of neurite formation. However, the mechanism of how MARCKS is involved in lamellipodia formation is not precisely unknown. Using SH‐SY5Y cells, we demonstrated here that MARCKS was translocated from cytosol to detergent‐resistant membrane microdomains, known as lipid rafts, within 30 min after insulin‐like growth factor‐I (IGF‐I) stimulation, which was accompanied by MARCKS dephosphorylation, β‐actin accumulation in lipid rafts, and lamellipodia formation. The protein kinase C inhibitor, Ro‐31‐8220, and Rho‐kinase inhibitors, HA1077 and Y27632, themselves decreased basal phosphorylation levels of MARCKS and coincidently elicited translocation of MARCKS to lipid rafts. On the other hand, the phosphoinositide 3‐kinase inhibitor, LY294002, abolished IGF‐I‐induced dephosphorylation, translocation of MARCKS to lipid rafts, and lamellipodia formation. Treatment of cells with neomycin, a PIP₂‐masking reagent, attenuated the translocation of MARCKS to lipid rafts and the lamellipodia formation induced by IGF‐I, although dephosphorylation of MARCKS was not affected. Immunocytochemical and immunoprecipitation analysis indicated that IGF‐I stimulation induced the translocation of MARCKS to lipid rafts in the edge of lamellipodia and formation of the complex with PIP₂. Moreover, we demonstrated that knockdown of endogenous MARCKS resulted in significant attenuation of IGF‐I‐induced β‐actin accumulation in the lipid rafts and lamellipodia formation. These results suggest a novel role for MARCKS in lamellipodia formation induced by IGF‐I via the translocation of MARCKS, association with PIP₂, and accumulation of β‐actin in the membrane microdomains. J. Cell. Physiol. 220: 748–755, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Protrusion and actin assembly are coupled to the organization of lamellar contractile structures

Directed cell migration requires continuous cycles of protrusion of the leading edge and contraction to pull up the cell rear. How these spatially distributed processes are coordinated to maintain a state of persistent protrusion remains unknown. During wound healing responses of epithelial sheets, cells along the wound edge display two distinct morphologies: ‘leader cells’ exhibit persistent edge protrusions, while the greater majority of ‘follower cells’ randomly cycle between protrusion and retraction. Here, we exploit the heterogeneity in cell morphodynamic behaviors to deduce the requirements in terms of cytoskeleton dynamics for persistent and sporadic protrusion events. We used quantitative Fluorescent Speckle Microscopy (qFSM) to compare rates of F-actin assembly and flow relative to the local protrusion and retraction dynamics of the leading edge. Persistently protruding cells are characterized by contractile actomyosin structures that align with the direction of migration, with converging F-actin flows interpenetrating over a wide band in the lamella. Conversely, non-persistent protruders have their actomyosin structures aligned perpendicular to the axis of migration, and are characterized by prominent F-actin retrograde flows that end into transverse arcs. Analysis of F-actin kinetics in the lamellipodia showed that leader cells have three-fold higher assembly rates when compared to followers. To further investigate a putative relationship between actomyosin contraction and F-actin assembly, myosin II was inhibited by blebbistatin. Treated cells at the wound edge adopted a homogeneously persistent protrusion behavior, with rates matching those of leader cells. Surprisingly, we found that disintegration of actomyosin structures led to a significant decrease in F-actin assembly. Our data suggests that persistent protrusion in these cells is achieved by a reduction in overall F-actin retrograde flow, with lower assembly rates now sufficient to propel forward the leading edge. Based on our data we propose that differences in the protrusion persistence of leaders and followers originate in the distinct actomyosin contraction modules that differentially regulate leading edge protrusion-promoting F-actin assembly, and retraction-promoting retrograde flow.     

Cell migration without a lamellipodium: translation of actin dynamics into cell movement mediated by tropomyosin

The actin cytoskeleton is locally regulated for functional specializations for cell motility. Using quantitative fluorescent speckle microscopy (qFSM) of migrating epithelial cells, we previously defined two distinct F-actin networks based on their F-actin-binding proteins and distinct patterns of F-actin turnover and movement. The lamellipodium consists of a treadmilling F-actin array with rapid polymerization-dependent retrograde flow and contains high concentrations of Arp2/3 and ADF/cofilin, whereas the lamella exhibits spatially random punctae of F-actin assembly and disassembly with slow myosin-mediated retrograde flow and contains myosin II and tropomyosin (TM). In this paper, we microinjected skeletal muscle alphaTM into epithelial cells, and using qFSM, electron microscopy, and immunolocalization show that this inhibits functional lamellipodium formation. Cells with inhibited lamellipodia exhibit persistent leading edge protrusion and rapid cell migration. Inhibition of endogenous long TM isoforms alters protrusion persistence. Thus, cells can migrate with inhibited lamellipodia, and we suggest that TM is a major regulator of F-actin functional specialization in migrating cells.     

Membrane transport of WAVE2 and lamellipodia formation require Pak1 that mediates phosphorylation and recruitment of stathmin/Op18 to Pak1–WAVE2–kinesin complex

Membrane transport of WAVE2 that leads to lamellipodia formation requires a small GTPase Rac1, the motor protein kinesin, and microtubules. Here we explore the possibility of whether the Rac1-dependent and kinesin-mediated WAVE2 transport along microtubules is regulated by a p21-activated kinase Pak as a downstream effector of Rac1. We find that Pak1 constitutively binds to WAVE2 and is transported with WAVE2 to the leading edge by stimulation with hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Concomitantly, phosphorylation of tubulin-bound stathmin/Op18 at serine 25 (Ser25) and Ser38, microtubule growth, and stathmin/Op18 binding to kinesin–WAVE2 complex were induced. The HGF-induced WAVE2 transport, lamellipodia formation, stathmin/Op18 phosphorylation at Ser38 and binding to kinesin–WAVE2 complex, but not stathmin/Op18 phosphorylation at Ser25 and microtubule growth, were abrogated by Pak1 inhibitor IPA-3 and Pak1 depletion with small interfering RNA (siRNA). Moreover, stathmin/Op18 depletion with siRNA caused significant inhibition of HGF-induced WAVE2 transport and lamellipodia formation, with HGF-independent promotion of microtubule growth. Collectively, it is suggested that Pak1 plays a critical role in HGF-induced WAVE2 transport and lamellipodia formation by directing Pak1–WAVE2–kinesin complex toward the ends of growing microtubules through phosphorylation and recruitment of tubulin-bound stathmin/Op18 to the complex.     

Insulin-like growth factor-I inhibits rat arterial K(ATP) channels through pI 3-kinase

Since, in addition to its growth-promoting actions, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) has rapid vasoactive actions, we investigated the effects of IGF-I on whole-cell ATP-sensitive K⁺ (K_ATP) currents of rat mesenteric arterial smooth muscle cells. IGF-I (10 or 30 nM) reduced K_ATP currents activated by pinacidil or a membrane permeant cAMP analogue. Inhibition of phospholipase C, protein kinase C, protein kinase A, mitogen-activated protein kinase or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) did not prevent the action of IGF-I. However, inhibition of K_ATP currents by IGF-I was abolished by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein or the phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, LY 294002 and wortmannin. Intracellular application of either phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂) or phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP₃) increased the K_ATP current activated by pinacidil and abolished the inhibitory effect of IGF-I. Thus, we show regulation of arterial K_ATP channels by polyphosphoinositides and report for the first time that IGF-I inhibits these channels via a phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent pathway.     

PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 binding is necessary for WAVE2-induced formation of lamellipodia

Polarized cell movement is triggered by the development of a PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3) gradient at the membrane, which is followed by rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton. The WASP family verprolin homologous protein (WAVE) is essential for lamellipodium formation at the leading edge by activating the Arp2/3 complex downstream of Rac GTPase. Here, we report that WAVE2 binds to PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3) through its basic domain. The amino-terminal portion of WAVE2, which includes the PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3)-binding sequence, was localized at the leading edge of lamellipodia induced by an active form of Rac (RacDA) or by treatment with platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). Production of PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3) at the cell membrane by myristoylated phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI(3)K) is sufficient to recruit WAVE2 in the presence of dominant-negative Rac and latrunculin, demonstrating that PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3) alone is able to recruit WAVE2. Expression of a full-length mutant of WAVE2 that lacks the lipid-binding activity inhibited proper formation of lamellipodia induced by RacDA. These results suggest that one of the products of PI(3)K, PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3), recruits WAVE2 to the polarized membrane and that this recruitment is essential for lamellipodium formation at the leading edge.     

Requirement of kinesin-mediated membrane transport of WAVE2 along microtubules for lamellipodia formation promoted by hepatocyte growth factor

Lamellipodia formation necessary for epithelial cell migration and invasion is accomplished by rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton at the leading edge through membrane transport of WAVE2. However, how WAVE2 is transported to the cell periphery where lamellipodia are formed remains to be established. We report here that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) promoted lamellipodia formation and intracellular transport of WAVE2 to the cell periphery, depending on Rac1 activity, in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. Immunoblot analyses indicating the coimmunoprecipitation of WAVE2 with kinesin heavy chain KIF5B, one of the motor proteins, and IQGAP1 suggest that KIF5B and IQGAP1 formed a complex with WAVE2 in serum-starved cells and increased in their amount after HGF stimulation. Both downregulation of KIF5B by the small interfering RNA and depolymerization of microtubules with nocodazole abrogated the HGF-induced lamellipodia formation and WAVE2 transport. Therefore, we propose here that the promotion of lamellipodia formation by HGF in MDA-MB-231 cells is Rac1-dependent and requires KIF5B-mediated transport of WAVE2 and IQGAP1 to the cell periphery along microtubules.     

βPIX and GIT1 regulate HGF-induced lamellipodia formation and WAVE2 transport

Formation of lamellipodia is the first step during cell migration, and involves actin reassembly at the leading edge of migrating cells through the membrane transport of WAVE2. However, the factors that regulate WAVE2 transport to the cell periphery for initiating lamellipodia formation have not been elucidated. We report here that in human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells, the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) induced the association between the constitutive complex of βPIX and GIT1 with WAVE2, which was concomitant with the induction of lamellipodia formation and WAVE2 transport. Although depletion of βPIX by RNA interference abrogated the HGF-induced WAVE2 transport and lamellipodia formation, GIT1 depletion caused HGF-independent WAVE2 transport and lamellipodia formation. Collectively, we suggest that βPIX releases cells from the GIT1-mediated suppression of HGF-independent responses and recruits GIT1 to WAVE2, thereby facilitating HGF-induced WAVE2 transport and lamellipodia formation.     

Spatial localization of mono-and diphosphorylated myosin II regulatory light chain at the leading edge of motile HeLa cells

Nonmuscle myosin II activity is regulated by phosphorylation of the myosin II regulatory light chain (MRLC) at Ser19 or at both Thr18 and Ser19, and the phosphorylation of MRLC promotes the contractility and stability of actomyosin. To analyze the states of MRLC phosphorylation at the leading edge in the motile HeLa cells, we have examined the subcellular distribution of monophosphorylated or diphosphorylated form of MRLC using a confocal microscope. The cross-sectional imaging revealed that monophosphorylated MRLC distributed throughout the cortical region and the leading edge, but its fluorescent signal was much stronger at the leading edge. This distribution pattern of monophosphorylated MRLC was almost identical to those of myosin II and F-actin. On the other hand, diphosphorylated MRLC is localized at the base of leading edge, spatially very close to the substrate, and colocalized with F-actin in part at the base of filopodia. Diphosphorylated MRLC was hardly detectable at the tip of filopodia and the cell cortical region, where monophosphorylated MRLC was clearly detected. These localization patterns suggest that myosin II is activated at the leading edge, especially at the base but not the tip of filopodia in motile cells. Next, we analyzed the cells expressing GFP-tagged recombinant MRLCs. Expression of GFP-tagged diphosphorylatable and monophosphorylatable MRLCs led to a significant increase in the filopodial number, compared with the cells expressing nonphosphorylatable MRLC. This result indicated that expression of phosphorylatable MRLC enhances the formation of filopodia at the wound edge.     

A Leep1 into migration and macropinocytosis

Actin organization underpins conserved functions at the leading edge of cells. In this issue, Yang et al. (2021. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202010096) characterize Leep1 as a bi-functional regulator of migration and macropinocytosis through PIP₃ and the Scar/WAVE complex.

Asymmetry at the molecular and structural levels is a key feature, conserved through evolution, for unicellular and multicellular organisms to perform essential cellular functions. Cell migration is a clear example where asymmetry plays an essential role by ensuring a polarized morphology with structurally and biochemically specialized leading and trailing edges, each mediating different roles in motility (1). Dictyostelium is a valuable model for dissecting the molecular mechanisms of cell polarity. At the leading edge of cells, actin-rich pseudopods are extended for cell motility and actin frames the formation of dorsal ruffles, which form macropinocytic cups to uptake extracellular fluid and nutrients in large (>0.2-µm diameter) vacuolar macropinosomes. There is keen interest in macropinocytosis as an essential pathway for migration and immune surveillance in innate immune cells and for nutrient acquisition and enhanced survival in cancer cells (2, 3). In this issue, Yang et al. describe how Leep1, a novel polarity protein in Dictyostelium, fine-tunes actin dynamics to support macropinocytosis and cell motility through its interaction at the interface of membrane PIP₃ and the Scar/WASP-family verprolin-homologous protein (WAVE) complex (4).First, the authors conducted a proteomic screen to identify polarity regulators among peripheral membrane proteins recruited in response to cAMP, a chemoattractant for Dictyostelium. Their screen relied on comparison with the translocation dynamic of the Pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of the cytosolic regulator of adenylyl cyclase (PHcrac), which relocates to the plasma membrane and binds PI3,4P₂/PIP₃ upon stimulation with cAMP. Among the leading edge proteins, the researchers identified known chemotactic regulators such as ForG, and also uncharacterized proteins, including Leep1, which they named after “Leading edge enriched protein 1.” They confirmed that Leep1 redistributed to the cell periphery in response to cAMP and folic acid gradients. Leep1 was strongly associated with macropinocytic cups, and it was recruited, albeit infrequently, to pseudopods in randomly migrating cells. Importantly, Leep1 colocalized with PHcrac in macropinocytic cups but was excluded from membranes associated with the PI phosphatase Pten. This led them to analyze Leep1 domains, and they found leucine-rich repeats (LRR) in a mid-section and a PH domain-like fold at the N terminus. Using truncation mutants, the authors established that the N terminus of Leep1 mediated membrane binding and localization to macropinocytic cups. They further confirmed that PIP₃ is required for Leep1 membrane binding by using lipid dot blots to assess in vitro lipid binding and PI3K inhibitors to manipulate phospholipid dynamics.Although Leep1 associated prominently with newly forming macropinocytic cup membranes, up to the point of cup closure, Leep1 knockouts in Dictyostelium presented no overt phenotypes and no dire loss of uptake or migration. In a closer examination, however, Yang et al. found that Leep1+ knockout mutants presented a ∼35% reduction in the rate of macropinocytosis, as measured by dextran uptake (4). This impaired macropinocytosis was related to the formation of shallower cups that failed to close or that formed smaller vesicles in comparison to the wild-type strain. Such reduction in the number of closed macropinocytic cups and deficient nutrient intake translated into an increased culture time for the mutants growing in liquid medium. Interestingly, the loss of Leep1 did not affect the size of ruffles nor block cell chemotaxis but decreased pseudopod splitting; these results imply that, although dispensable for directed cell migration, Leep1 is needed for fine-tuning pseudopod dynamics during movement.Following overexpression of Leep1 in Dictyostelium, there was a dramatic appearance of spiky filopodia all over cells. Only Leep1 mutants with an intact C terminus and membrane binding domain produced abundant filopodia and, simultaneously, these cells generated smaller and shallower macropinocytic cups and failed to internalize dextran efficiently. The researchers observed a stark difference in actin-based projections on cells with different levels of Leep1, but how this resulted in a trade-off between filopodia and macropinocytic cups is a query that they did not explore further. It would be interesting to examine such a rheostat effect on F-actin in mammalian cells, where ruffle-associated filopodia can coexist with and contribute to macropinocytosis (5, 6). To study the pathways and binding partners through which Leep1 could modulate actin-based protrusions, they performed immunoprecipitations and mass spectrometry. In formaldehyde-cross-linked samples, they found Leep1 engaged in weak or transient interactions with the actin nucleating complex Scar/WAVE through its PirA and NapA components. Interestingly, another earlier screening approach had revealed Leep1 as an uncharacterized binding partner of NapA (7). Moreover, the Scar/WAVE complex is of high interest in this context given its known association with macropinosomes, filopodia, and pseudopods (8, 9). Scar/WAVE disruption in Dictyostelium reduces macropinocytosis and increases filopodia formation, similarly to overexpression of Leep1. The highly dynamic and transient interaction of PIP₃-recruited Leep1 corresponded here to its adjacent (but not overlapping) recruitment of Scar/WAVE on the membrane (Fig. 1). Indeed, this mirrors the previous observation that, although high concentrations of PIP₃ recruit Scar/WAVE complex to the cell periphery, they do not overlap in the membrane in Dictyostelium (8). Yang et al. have now identified Leep1 as the link that promotes the spatially distinct recruitment of Scar/WAVE by PIP₃ to the leading edge(4). The authors explored this link in detail and found that deletion of the C terminus, but not the N terminus, in Leep1 mutants abolished Scar/WAVE recruitment. C-terminal mutants also failed to promote filopodia formation when overexpressed and could not rescue the macropinocytosis defect in Leep1 knockouts. Therefore, the N terminus of Leep1 is needed to position it on the membrane where its C terminus can interact with Scar/WAVE to either make filopodia or macropinosomes. An intriguing observation was that PirA and Leep1 were alternately recruited for moving and retraction or splitting of pseudopods, respectively. Overall, the actions of Leep1 are consistent with its role as a negative regulator of Scar/WAVE.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.PIP₃-recruited Leep1 negatively regulates the Scar/WAVE complex to modulate pseudopod and macropinosome dynamics. (A) Leep1 is enriched at the rims of macropinocytic cups, where it supports macropinosome formation, and is periodically in pseudopods, where it regulates pseudopod splitting. (B) Loss of Leep1 produces smaller macropinosomes and reduces pseudopod splitting. (C) Overexpression of Leep1 leads to unconstrained filopodia formation and inefficient macropinocytosis.This exciting study introduces Leep1 as a novel lipid-recruited actin regulator on macropinosomes and pseudopods, where it joins a throng of diverse actin modulators on these domains. The relatively mild phenotype of Leep1 knockouts implies there are actin regulators with complementary or compensatory roles, and other proteins in this context have recently come to light through studies in Dictyostelium. CYFIP-related Rac interactor is a Rac1 binding partner, and while it is not recruited by PIP₃, it is also a negative regulator of Scar/WAVE that regulates actin for leading edge extension and retraction during migration (7). The recently described BAR domain–containing protein RGBARG (RCC1, RhoGEF, BAR, and RasGAP-containing protein; 10) coordinates lipid and actin dynamics from sites at the rim of macropinocytic and phagocytic cups in Dictyostelium. RGBARG coordinates Rac1 activation at the tip of cups to drive actin extension while suppressing Ras in the interior to shape cups. How Leep1 intersects with these and other disparate players is yet to be reconciled into mechanistic models that explain the spatio-temporal coordination of PIP₃, Scar/WAVE, and Rac1 pathways that generate distinct actin-mediated protrusions. While a degree of similarity with conserved capping protein, Arp2/3 and myosin-I protein has been noted for Leep1, future studies will help clarify whether Leep1 has a conserved mammalian equivalent with similar cellular roles at the leading edge. Overall, the study by Yang et al. represents an important leap toward understanding fundamental regulators of the complex interactions coordinating actin-based macropinocytosis and migration.     

Abi1 is essential for the formation and activation of a WAVE2 signalling complex

WAVE2 belongs to a family of proteins that mediates actin reorganization by relaying signals from Rac to the Arp2/3 complex, resulting in lamellipodia protrusion. WAVE2 displays Arp2/3-dependent actin nucleation activity in vitro, and does not bind directly to Rac. Instead, it forms macromolecular complexes that have been reported to exert both positive and negative modes of regulation. How these complexes are assembled, localized and activated in vivo remains to be established. Here we use tandem mass spectrometry to identify an Abi1-based complex containing WAVE2, Nap1 (Nck-associated protein) and PIR121. Abi1 interacts directly with the WHD domain of WAVE2, increases WAVE2 actin polymerization activity and mediates the assembly of a WAVE2-Abi1-Nap1-PIR121 complex. The WAVE2-Abi1-Nap1-PIR121 complex is as active as the WAVE2-Abi1 sub-complex in stimulating Arp2/3, and after Rac activation it is re-localized to the leading edge of ruffles in vivo. Consistently, inhibition of Abi1 by RNA interference (RNAi) abrogates Rac-dependent lamellipodia protrusion. Thus, Abi1 orchestrates the proper assembly of the WAVE2 complex and mediates its activation at the leading edge in vivo.     

Excitable actin dynamics in lamellipodial protrusion and retraction

Many animal cells initiate crawling by protruding lamellipodia, consisting of a dense network of actin filaments, at their leading edge. We imaged XTC cells that exhibit flat lamellipodia on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips. Using active contours, we tracked the leading edge and measured the total amount of F-actin by summing the pixel intensities within a 5-μm band. We observed protrusion and retraction with period 130–200 s and local wavelike features. Positive (negative) velocities correlated with minimum (maximum) integrated actin concentration. Approximately constant retrograde flow indicated that protrusions and retractions were driven by fluctuations of the actin polymerization rate. We present a model of these actin dynamics as an excitable system in which a diffusive, autocatalytic activator causes actin polymerization; F-actin accumulation in turn inhibits further activator accumulation. Simulations of the model reproduced the pattern of actin polymerization seen in experiments. To explore the model's assumption of an autocatalytic activation mechanism, we imaged cells expressing markers for both F-actin and the p21 subunit of the Arp2/3 complex. We found that integrated Arp2/3-complex concentrations spike several seconds before spikes of F-actin concentration. This suggests that the Arp2/3 complex participates in an activation mechanism that includes additional diffuse components. Response of cells to stimulation by fetal calf serum could be reproduced by the model, further supporting the proposed dynamical picture.