Simultaneous replacement of Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 with Asn increases proton uptake by Glu-L212 upon first electron transfer to QB in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the first electron transfer to the secondary quinone acceptor Q(B) is coupled to the protonation of Glu-L212, located approximately 5 A from the center of Q(B). Upon the second electron transfer to Q(B), Glu-L212 is involved in fast proton delivery to the reduced Q(B). Since Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 play an important role in the proton transfer to the Q(B) site [Paddock, M. L., Adelroth, P., Chang, C., Abresch, E. C., Feher, G., and Okamura, M. Y. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 6893-6902], we investigated the effects of replacing one or both Asp residues with Asn on proton uptake by Glu-L212 using FTIR difference spectroscopy. Upon the first electron transfer to Q(B), the amplitude of the proton uptake by Glu-L212 at pH 8 is increased in the single and double mutant RCs, as is evident from the larger intensity (by 35-55%) of the carboxylic acid band at 1727 cm(-1) in the Q(B)(-)/Q(B) difference spectra of mutant RCs, compared to that at 1728 cm(-1) in native RCs. This implies that the extent of ionization of Glu-L212 in the Q(B) ground state is greater in the mutants than in native RCs and that Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 are at least partially ionized near neutral pH in native RCs. In addition, no changes in the protonation state or the environment of these two residues are detected upon Q(B) reduction. The absence of the 1727 cm(-1) signal in all of the RCs lacking Glu-L212, confirms that the positive band at 1728-1727 cm(-1) probes the protonation of Glu-L212 in native and mutant RCs.     

Identification of a novel protonation pattern for carboxylic acids upon Q(B) photoreduction in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center mutants at Asp-L213 and Glu-L212 sites

In the reaction center from the photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, light energy is rapidly converted to chemical energy through coupled electron-proton transfer to a buried quinone molecule Q(B). Involved in the proton uptake steps are carboxylic acids, which have characteristic infrared vibrations that are observable using light-induced Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy. Upon formation, Q(B)(-) induces protonation of Glu-L212, located within 5 A of Q(B), resulting in a IR signal at 1728 cm(-1). However, no other IR signal is observed within the classic absorption range of protonated carboxylic acids (1770-1700 cm(-1)). In particular, no signal for Asp-L213 is found despite its juxtaposition to Q(B) and importance for proton uptake on the second electron-transfer step. In an attempt to uncover the reason behind this lack of signal, the microscopic electrostatic environment in the vicinity of Q(B) was modified by interchanging Asp and Glu at the L213 and L212 positions. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) FTIR spectrum of the Asp-L212/Glu-L213 swap mutant in the 1770-1700 cm(-1) range shows several distinct new signals, which are sensitive to (1)H/(2)H isotopic exchange, indicating that the reduction of Q(B) results in the change of the protonation state of several carboxylic acids. The new bands at 1752 and 1747 cm(-1) were assigned to an increase of protonation in response to Q(B) reduction of Glu-L213 and Asp-L212, respectively, based on the effect of replacing them with their amine analogues. Since other carboxylic acid signals were observed, it is concluded that the swap mutations at L212 and L213 affect a cluster of carboxylic acids larger than the L212/L213 acid pair. Implications for the native reaction center are discussed.     

Redox potential of quinones in photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: dependence on protonation of Glu-L212 and Asp-L213

The absolute values of the one-electron redox potentials of the two quinones (Q(A) and Q(B)) in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were calculated by evaluating the electrostatic energies from the solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation at pH 7.0. The redox potential for Q(A) was calculated to be between -173 and -160 mV, which is close to the lowest measured values that are assumed to refer to nonequilibrated protonation patterns in the redox state Q(A)(-). The redox potential of quinone Q(B) is found to be about 160-220 mV larger for the light-exposed than for the dark-adapted structure. These values of the redox potentials are obtained if Asp-L213 is nearly protonated (probability 0.75-1.0) before and after electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), while Glu-L212 is partially protonated (probability 0.6) in the initial state Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) and fully protonated in the final state Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-). Conversely, if the charge state of the quinones is varied from Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) to Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-) corresponding to the electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), Asp-L213 remains protonated, while Glu-L212 changes its protonation state from 0.15 H(+) to fully protonated. In agreement with results from FTIR spectra, there is proton uptake at Glu-L212 going along with the electron transfer, whereas Asp-L213 does not change its protonation state. However, in our simulations Asp-L213 is considered to be protonated rather than ionized as deduced from FTIR spectra. The calculated redox potential of Q(A) shows little dependence on the charge state of Asp-L213, which is due to a strong coupling with the protonation state of Asp-M17 but increases by 50 mV if Glu-L212 changes from the ionized to the protonated charge state. Both are in agreement with fluorescence measurements observing the decay of SP(+)Q(A)(-) in a wide pH regime. The computed difference in redox potential of Q(B) in the light-exposed and dark-adapted structure was traced back to the hydrogen bond of Q(B) with His-L190 that is lost in the dark-adapted structure and the charge of the non-heme iron atom, which is closer to Q(B) in the light-exposed than in the dark-adapted structure.     

Monitoring the pH dependence of IR carboxylic acid signals upon Q(B)- formation in the Glu-L212 --> Asp/Asp-L213 --> Glu swap mutant reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, proton-coupled electron-transfer reactions occur at the secondary quinone (QB) site. Involved in the proton uptake steps are carboxylic acids, which have characteristic infrared vibrations in the 1770-1700 cm-1 spectral range that are sensitive to 1H/2H isotopic exchange. With respect to the native RC, a novel protonation pattern for carboxylic acids upon QB photoreduction has been identified in the Glu-L212 --> Asp/Asp-L213 --> Glu mutant RC using light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy (Nabedryk, E., Breton, J., Okamura, M. Y., and Paddock, M. L. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 7236-7243). These carboxylic acids are structurally close and have been implicated in proton transfer to reduced QB. In this work, we extend previous studies by measuring the pH dependence of the QB-/QB FTIR difference spectra of the mutant in 1H2O and 2H2O. Large pH dependent changes were observed in the 1770-1700 cm-1 spectral range between pH 8 and pH 4. The IR fingerprints of the protonating carboxylic acids upon QB- formation were obtained from the calculated double-difference spectra 1H2O minus 2H2O. These IR fingerprints are specific for each pH, indicative of the contribution of different titrating groups. In particular, the 1752 cm-1 signal indicates that Glu-L213 protonates upon QB- formation at pH >or= 5, whereas the 1746 cm-1 signal indicates protonation of Asp-L212 even at pH 4. An unidentified carboxylic acid absorbing at approximately 1765 cm-1 could be the proton donor between pH 8 and 5. The observation that in the swap mutant there are several uniquely behaving carboxylic acids shows that electrostatic interactions occurring between them are sufficiently modified from the native RC to reveal their IR signatures.     

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: cooperation between Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 facilitates proton transfer to the secondary quinone (QB)

The reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides uses light energy to reduce and protonate a quinone molecule, Q(B) (the secondary quinone electron acceptor), to form quinol, Q(B)H2. Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 have been proposed to be components of the pathway for proton transfer [Axelrod, H. L., Abresch, E. C., Paddock, M. L., Okamura, M. Y., and Feher, G. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1542-1547]. To test the importance of these residues for efficient proton transfer, the rates of the proton-coupled electron-transfer reaction k(AB)(2) (Q(A-*)Q(B-*) + H+ <==>Q(A-*)Q(B)H* --> Q(A)Q(B)H-) and its associated proton uptake were measured in native and mutant RCs, lacking one or both Asp residues. In the double mutant RCs, the k(AB)(2) reaction and its associated proton uptake were approximately 300-fold slower than in native RCs (pH 8). In contrast, single mutant RCs displayed reaction rates that were < or =3-fold slower than native (pH 8). In addition, the rate-limiting step of k(AB)(2) was changed from electron transfer (native and single mutants) to proton transfer (double mutant) as shown from the lack of a dependence of the observed rate on the driving force for electron transfer in the double mutant RCs compared to the native or single mutants. This implies that the rate of the proton-transfer step was reduced (> or =10(3)-fold) upon replacement of both Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 with Asn. Similar, but less drastic, differences were observed for k(AB)(1), which at pH > or =8 is coupled to the protonation of Glu-L212 [(Q(A-*)Q(B))-Glu- + H+ --> (Q(A)Q(B-*)-GluH]. These results show that the pathway for proton transfer from solution to reduced Q(B) involves both Asp-L210 and Asp-M17, which provide parallel branches to the proton-transfer pathway and through their electrostatic interaction have a cooperative effect on the proton-transfer rate. A possible mechanism for the cooperativity is discussed.     

Rapid-scan Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy shows coupling of GLu-L212 protonation and electron transfer to Q(B) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

Rapid-scan Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy was used to investigate the electron transfer reaction Q(A-)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(B-) (k(AB)(1)) in mutant reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, where Asp-L210 and/or Asp-M17 have been replaced with Asn. Mutation of both residues decreases drastically k(AB)(1)), attributed to slow proton transfer to Glu-L212, which becomes rate limiting for electron transfer to Q(B) [M.L. Paddock et al., Biochemistry 40 (2001) 6893]. In the double mutant, the FTIR difference spectrum recorded during the time window 4-29 ms following a flash showed peaks at 1670 (-), 1601 (-) and 1467 (+) cm(-1), characteristic of Q(A) reduction. The time evolution of the spectra shows reoxidation of Q(A-) and concomitant reduction of Q(B) with a kinetics of about 40 ms. In native reaction centers and in both single mutants, formation of Q(B-) occurs much faster than in the double mutant. Within the time resolution of the technique, protonation of Glu-L212, as characterized by an absorption increase at 1728 cm(-1) [E. Nabedryk et al., Biochemistry 34 (1995) 14722], was found to proceed with the same kinetics as reduction of Q(B) in all samples. These rapid-scan FTIR results support the model of proton uptake being rate limiting for the first electron transfer from Q(A-) to Q(B) and the identification of Glu-L212 as the main proton acceptor in the state Q(A)Q(B-).     

Fourier transform infrared evidence of proton uptake by glutamate L212 upon reduction of the secondary quinone QB in the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter capsulatus

The photoreduction of the secondary quinone Q(B) in native reaction centers (RCs) of Rhodobacter capsulatus and in RCs from the GluL212 --> Gln and GluL212 --> Ala mutants has been investigated at pH 7 in (1)H(2)O and (2)H(2)O by light-induced Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) FTIR difference spectra reflect changes of quinone-protein interactions and of protonation state of carboxylic acid groups as well as reorganization of the protein upon electron transfer. Comparison of Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra of native and mutant RCs indicates that the interactions between Q(B) or Q(B)(-) and the protein are similar in all RCs. A differential signal at approximately 1650/1640 cm(-1), which is common to all the spectra, is associated with a movement of a peptide carbonyl or a side chain following Q(B) reduction. On the other hand, Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra of native and mutant RCs display several differences, notably between 1700 and 1650 cm(-1) (amide I and side chains), between 1570 and 1530 cm(-1) (amide II), and at 1728-1730 cm(-1) (protonated carboxylic acid groups). In particular, the latter region in native RCs is characterized by a main positive band at 1728 cm(-1) and a negative signal at 1739 cm(-1). In the L212 mutants, the amplitude of the positive band is strongly decreased leading to a differential signal at 1739/1730 cm(-1) that is insensitive to (1)H/(2)H isotopic exchange. In native RCs, only the 1728 cm(-1) band is affected in (2)H(2)O while the 1739 cm(-1) signal is not. The effects of the mutations and of (1)H/(2)H exchange on the Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra concur in the attribution of the 1728 cm(-1) band in native RCs to (partial) proton uptake by GluL212 upon the first electron transfer to Q(B), as previously observed in Rhodobacter sphaeroides RCs [Nabedryk, E., Breton, J., Hienerwadel, R., Fogel, C., M?ntele, W., Paddock, M. L., and Okamura, M. Y. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 14722-14732]. More generally, strong homologies of the Q(B) to Q(B)(-) transition in the RCs from Rb. sphaeroides and Rb. capsulatus are detected by differential FTIR spectroscopy. The FTIR data are discussed in relation with the results from global proton uptake measurements and electrogenic events concomitant with the reduction of Q(B) and with a model of the Q(B) turnover in Rb. sphaeroides RCs [Mulkidjanian, A. Y. (1999) FEBS Lett. 463, 199-204].     

An isotope-edited FTIR investigation of the role of Ser-L223 in binding quinone (QB) and semiquinone (QB-) in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, proton-coupled electron-transfer reactions occur at the secondary quinone (Q(B)) site. Several nearby residues are important for both binding and redox chemistry involved in the light-induced conversion from Q(B) to quinol Q(B)H(2). Ser-L223 is one of the functionally important residues located near Q(B). To obtain information on the interaction between Ser-L223 and Q(B) and Q(B)(-), isotope-edited Q(B)(-)/Q(B) FTIR difference spectra were measured in a mutant RC in which Ser-L223 is replaced with Ala and compared to the native RC. The isotope-edited IR fingerprint spectra for the C=O [see text] and C=C [see text] modes of Q(B) (Q(B)(-)) in the mutant are essentially the same as those of the native RC. These findings indicate that highly equivalent interactions of Q(B) and Q(B)(-) with the protein occur in both native and mutant RCs. The simplest explanation of these results is that Ser-L223 is not hydrogen bonded to Q(B) or Q(B)(-) but presumably forms a hydrogen bond to a nearby acid group, preferentially Asp-L213. The rotation of the Ser OH proton from Asp-L213 to Q(B)(-) is expected to be an important step in the proton transfer to the reduced quinone. In addition, the reduced quinone remains firmly bound, indicating that other distinct hydrogen bonds are more important for stabilizing Q(B)(-). Implications on the design features of the Q(B) binding site are discussed.     

Characterization of the bonding interactions of Q(B) upon photoreduction via A-branch or B-branch electron transfer in mutant reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers (RCs) containing the mutation Ala M260 to Trp (AM260W), transmembrane electron transfer along the full-length of the A-branch of cofactors is prevented by the loss of the Q(A) ubiquinone, but it is possible to generate the radical pair P(+)H(A)(-) by A-branch electron transfer or the radical pair P(+)Q(B)(-) by B-branch electron transfer. In the present study, FTIR spectroscopy was used to provide direct evidence for the complete absence of the Q(A) ubiquinone in mutant RCs with the AM260W mutation. Light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy of isolated RCs was also used to probe the neutral Q(B) and the semiquinone Q(B)(-) states in two B-branch active mutants, a double AM260W-LM214H mutant, denoted WH, and a quadruple mutant, denoted WAAH, in which the AM260W, LM214H, and EL212A-DL213A mutations were combined. The data were compared to those obtained with wild-type (Wt) RCs and the double EL212A-DL213A (denoted AA) mutant which exhibit the usual A-branch electron transfer to Q(B). The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectrum of the WH mutant is very close to that of Wt RCs indicating similar bonding interactions of Q(B) and Q(B)(-) with the protein in both RCs. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra of the AA and WAAH mutants are also closely related to one another, but are very different to that of the Wt complex. Isotope-edited IR fingerprint spectra were obtained for the AA and WAAH mutants reconstituted with site-specific (13)C-labeled ubiquinone. Whilst perturbations of the interactions of the semiquinone Q(B)(-) with the protein are observed in the AA and WAAH mutants, the FTIR data show that the bonding interaction of neutral Q(B) in these two mutants are essentially the same as those for Wt RCs. Therefore, it is concluded that Q(B) occupies the same binding position proximal to the non-heme iron prior to reduction by either A-branch or B-branch electron transfer.     

Energetics of proton transfer pathways in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The Glu-H173 activated mutants

Electron transfer between the primary and secondary quinones (Q(A), Q(B)) in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (bRC) is coupled with proton uptake at Q(B). The protons are conducted from the cytoplasmic side, probably with the participation of two water channels. Mutations of titratable residues like Asp-L213 to Asn (inhibited mutant) or the double mutant Glu-L212 to Ala/Asp-L213 to Ala inhibit these electron transfer-coupled proton uptake events. The inhibition of the proton transfer (PT) process in the single mutant can be restored by a second mutation of Arg-M233 to Cys or Arg-H177 to His (revertant mutant). These revertant mutants shed light on the location of the main proton transfer pathway of wild type bRC. In contrast to the wild type and inhibited mutant bRC, the revertant mutant bRC showed notable proton uptake at Glu-H173 upon formation of the Q(B)- state. In all of these mutants, the pK(a) of Asp-M17 decreased by 1.4-2.4 units with respect to the wild type bRC, whereas a significant pK(a) upshift of up to 5.8 units was observed at Glu-H122, Asp-H170, Glu-H173, and Glu-H230 in the revertant mutants. These residues belonging to the main PT pathway are arranged along water channel P1 localized mainly in subunit H. bRC possesses subunit H, which has no counterpart in photosystem II. Thus, bRC may possess alternative PT pathways involving water channels in subunit H, which becomes active in case the main PT pathway is blocked.     

Redox potential of the non-heme iron complex in bacterial photosynthetic reaction center

In bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (bRC), the electron is transferred from the special pair (P) via accessory bacteriochlorophyll (B(A)), bacteriopheopytin (H(A)), the primary quinone (Q(A)) to the secondary quinone (Q(B)). Although the non-heme iron complex (Fe complex) is located between Q(A) and Q(B), it was generally supposed not to be redox-active. Involvement of the Fe complex in electron transfer (ET) was proposed in recent FTIR studies [A. Remy and K. Gerwert, Coupling of light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake in photosynthesis, Nat. Struct. Biol. 10 (2003) 637-644]. However, other FTIR studies resulted in opposite results [J. Breton, Steady-state FTIR spectra of the photoreduction of Q(A) and Q(B) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers provide evidence against the presence of a proposed transient electron acceptor X between the two quinones, Biochemistry 46 (2007) 4459-4465]. In this study, we calculated redox potentials of Q(A/B) (E(m)(Q(A/B))) and the Fe complex (E(m)(Fe)) based on crystal structure of the wild-type bRC (WT-bRC), and we investigated the energetics of the system where the Fe complex is assumed to be involved in the ET. E(m)(Fe) in WT-bRC is much less pH-dependent than that in PSII. In WT-bRC, we observed significant coupling of ET with Glu-L212 protonation upon oxidation of the Fe complex and a dramatic E(m)(Fe) downshift by 230 mV upon formation of Q(A)(-) (but not Q(B)(-)) due to the absence of proton uptake of Glu-L212. Changes in net charges of the His ligands of the Fe complex appear to be the nature of the redox event if we assume the involvement of the Fe complex in the ET.     

Quinone (Q(B)) binding site and protein stuctural changes in photosynthetic reaction center mutants at Pro-L209 revealed by vibrational spectroscopy

The effect of substituting Pro-L209 with Tyr, Phe, Glu, and Thr in photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides was investigated by monitoring the light-induced FTIR absorption changes associated with the photoreduction of the secondary quinone Q(B). Pro-L209 is close to a chain of ordered water molecules connecting Q(B) to the bulk phase. In wild-type RCs, two distinct main Q(B) binding sites (distal and proximal to the non-heme iron) have been described in the literature. The X-ray structures of the mutant RCs Pro-L209 --> Tyr, Pro-L209 --> Phe, and Pro-L209 --> Glu have revealed that Q(B) occupies a proximal, intermediate, and distal position, respectively [Kuglstatter, A., Ermler, U., Michel, H., Baciou, L., and Fritzsch, G. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 4253-4260]. FTIR absorption changes associated with the reduction of Q(B) in Pro-L209 --> Phe RCs reconstituted with (13)C-labeled ubiquinone show a highly specific IR fingerprint for the C=O and C=C modes of Q(B) upon selective labeling at C(1) or C(4). This IR fingerprint is similar to those of wild-type RCs and the Pro-L209 --> Tyr mutant [Breton, J., Boullais, C., Mioskowski, C., Sebban, P., Baciou, L., and Nabedryk, E. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 12921-12927], demonstrating that equivalent interactions occur between neutral Q(B) and the protein in wild-type and mutant RCs. It is concluded that in all RCs, neutral Q(B) in its functional state occupies a unique binding site which is favored to be the proximal site. This result contrasts with the multiple Q(B) binding sites found in crystal structures. With respect to wild-type RCs, the largest FTIR spectral changes upon Q(B)(-) formation are observed for the Phe-L209 and Tyr-L209 mutants which undergo similar protein structural changes and perturbations of the semiquinone modes. Smaller changes are observed for the Glu-L209 mutant, while the vibrational properties of the Thr-L209 mutant are essentially the same as those for native RCs.     

X-Ray structure determination of three mutants of the bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers from Rb. sphaeroides; altered proton transfer pathways

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the reduction of a bound quinone molecule Q(B) is coupled with proton uptake. When Asp-L213 is replaced by Asn, proton transfer is inhibited. Proton transfer was restored by two second-site revertant mutations, Arg-M233-->Cys and Arg-H177-->His. Kinetic effects of Cd(2+) on proton transfer showed that the entry point in revertant RCs to be the same as in the native RC. The structures of the parental and two revertant RCs were determined at resolutions of 2.10, 1.80, and 2.75 A. From the structures, we were able to delineate alternate proton transfer pathways in the revertants. The main changes occur near Glu-H173, which allow it to substitute for the missing Asp-L213. The electrostatic changes near Glu-H173 cause it to be a good proton donor and acceptor, and the structural changes create a cavity which accommodates water molecules that connect Glu-H173 to other proton transfer components.     

Proton and electron transfer in the acceptor quinone complex of Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers: characterization of site-directed mutants of the two ionizable residues, GluL212 and AspL213, in the QB binding site.

Proton and electron transfer events in reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were investigated by site-directed mutagenesis of glutamic acid at position 212 and aspartic acid at 213 in the secondary quinone (QB) binding domain of the L subunit. These residues were mutated singly to the corresponding amides (mutants L212EQ and L213DN) and together to give the double mutant (L212EQ/L213DN). In the double mutant RCs, the rate of electron transfer from the primary (QA) to the secondary (QB) acceptor quinones is fast (tau approximately 300 microseconds) and is pH independent from pH 5 to 11. The rate of recombination between the oxidized primary donor, P+, and QB- is also pH independent and much slower (tau approximately 10 s) than in the wild type (Wt), indicating a significant stabilization of the QB- semiquinone. In the double mutant, and in L213DN mutant RCs at low pH, the P+QB- decay is suggested to occur significantly via a direct recombination rather than by repopulating the P+QA- state, as in the Wt. Comparison of the behavior of Wt and the three mutant RC types leads to the following conclusions: the pK of AspL213 in the Wt is approximately 4 for the QAQB state (pKQB) and approximately 5 for the QAQB-state (pKQB-); for GluL212, pKQB approximately 9.5 and pKQB- approximately 11. In L213DN mutant RCs, pKQB of GluL212 is less than or equal to 7, indicating that the high pK values of GluL212 in the Wt are due largely to electrostatic interaction with the ionized AspL213 which contributes a shift of at least 2.5 pH units. Transfer of the second electron and all associated proton uptake to form QBH2 is drastically inhibited in double mutant and L213DN mutant RCs. At pH greater than or equal to 8, the rates are at least 10(4)-fold slower than in Wt RCs. In L212EQ mutant RCs the second electron transfer and proton uptake are biphasic. The fast phase of the electron transfer is similar to that of the Wt, but the extent of rapid transfer is pH dependent, revealing the pH dependence of the equilibrium QA(-)QB- in equilibrium with QAQBH-. The estimated limits on the pK values--pKQA-QB-less than or equal to 7.3, pKQAQB2- greater than or equal to 10.4--are similar to those derived earlier for Wt RCs [Kleinfeld et al. (1985) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 809, 291-310] and may pertain to the quinone head group, per se.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Determination of proton transfer rates by chemical rescue: application to bacterial reaction centers

The bacterial reaction center (RC) converts light into chemical energy through the reduction of an internal quinone molecule Q(B) to Q(B)H(2). In the native RC, proton transfer is coupled to electron transfer and is not rate-controlling. Consequently, proton transfer is not directly observable, and its rate was unknown. In this work, we present a method for making proton transfer rate-controlling, which enabled us to determine its rate. The imidazole groups of the His-H126 and His-H128 proton donors, located at the entrance of the transfer pathways, were removed by site-directed mutagenesis (His --> Ala). This resulted in a reduction in the observed proton-coupled electron transfer rate [(Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B))Glu(-) + H(+) --> (Q(A)Q(B)(-)(*))GluH], which became rate-controlled by proton uptake to Glu-L212 [Adelroth, P., et al. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 14538-14546]. The proton uptake rate was enhanced (rescued) in a controlled fashion by the addition of imidazole or other amine-containing acids. From the dependence of the observed rate on acid concentration, an apparent second-order rate constant k((2)) for the "rescue" of the rate was determined. k((2)) is a function of the proton transfer rate and the binding of the acid. The dependence of k((2)) on the acid pK(a) (i.e., the proton driving force) was measured over 9 pK(a) units, resulting in a Br?nsted plot that was characteristic of general acid catalysis. The results were fitted to a model that includes the binding (facilitated by electrostatic attraction) of the cationic acid to the RC surface, proton transfer to an intermediate proton acceptor group, and subsequent proton transfer to Glu-L212. A proton transfer rate constant of approximately 10(5) s(-)(1) was determined for transfer from the bound imidazole group to Glu-L212 (over a distance of approximately 20 A). The same method was used to determine a proton transfer rate constant of 2 x 10(4) s(-)(1) for transfer to Q(B)(-)(*). The relatively fast proton transfer rates are explained by the presence of an intermediate acceptor group that breaks the process into sequential proton transfer steps over shorter distances. This study illustrates an approach that could be generally applied to obtain information about the individual rates and energies for proton transfer processes, as well as the pK(a)s of transfer components, in a variety of proton translocating systems.     

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: decrease of proton transfer rate by mutation of surface histidines at H126 and H128 and chemical rescue by imidazole identifies the initial proton donors.

The pathway for proton transfer to Q(B) was studied in the reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The binding of Zn(2+) or Cd(2+) to the RC surface at His-H126, His-H128, and Asp-H124 inhibits the rate of proton transfer to Q(B), suggesting that the His may be important for proton transfer [Paddock, M. L., Graige, M. S., Feher, G. and Okamura, M. Y. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 6183-6188]. To assess directly the role of the histidines, mutant RCs were constructed in which either one or both His were replaced with Ala. In the single His mutant RCs, no significant effects were observed. In contrast, in the double mutant RC at pH 8.5, the observed rates of proton uptake associated with both the first and the second proton-coupled electron-transfer reactions k(AB)(()(1)()) [Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B)-Glu(-) + H(+) --> Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B)-GluH --> Q(A)Q(B)(-)(*)-GluH] and k(AB)(()(2)()) [Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B)(-)(*) + H(+) --> Q(A)(-)(*)(Q(B)H)(*) --> Q(A)(Q(B)H)(-)], were found to be slowed by factors of approximately 10 and approximately 4, respectively. Evidence that the observed changes in the double mutant RC are due to a reduction in the proton-transfer rate constants are provided by the observations: (i) k(AB)(1) at pH approximately pK(a) of GluH became biphasic, indicating that proton transfer is slower than electron transfer and (ii) k(AB)(2) became independent of the driving force for electron transfer, indicating that proton transfer is the rate-limiting step. These changes were overcome by the addition of exogenous imidazole which acts as a proton donor in place of the imidazole groups of His that were removed in the double mutant RC. Thus, we conclude that His-H126 and His-H128 facilitate proton transfer into the RC, acting as RC-bound proton donors at the entrance of the proton-transfer pathways.     

Revealing the involvement of extended hydrogen bond networks in the cooperative function between distant sites in bacterial reaction centers

In reaction center proteins of photosynthetic bacteria, the amplitude of proton uptake induced by the one-electron reduction of either of the two quinone electron acceptors (Q(A) and Q(B)) is an intrinsic observable of the electrostatic interactions associated with the redox function of the complex. We report here that, in Rhodobacter capsulatus, complete restoration of proton uptake (upon formation of Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-)) to the level found in the wild type is observed in a mutant reaction center in which a tyrosine substitution in the Q(A) environment (Ala(M274) --> Tyr) is coupled with mutations of acidic residues near Q(B) (Glu(L212) --> Ala/Asp(L213) --> Ala) that initially cancel the proton uptake above pH 8. This result demonstrates that proton uptake occurs by strong cooperation between structural motifs, such as hydrogen-bonded networks, that span the 18 A distance between the two quinone acceptors.     

Direct evidence of structural changes in reaction centers of Rb. sphaeroides containing suppressor mutations for Asp L213 → Asn: A FTIR study of QB photoreduction

In bacterial reaction centers (RCs), changes of protonation state of carboxylic groups, of quinone-protein interactions as well as backbone rearrangements occuring upon Q_B photoreduction can be revealed by FTIR difference spectroscopy. The influence of compensatory mutations to the detrimental Asp L213 Asn replacement on Q_B ^–/Q_B FTIR spectra of Rb. sphaeroides RCs was studied in three double mutants carrying a Asn M44 Asp, Arg M233 Cys, or Arg H177 His suppressor mutation. The proton uptake by Glu L212 upon Q_B ^– formation, as reflected by the positive band at 1728 cm^–1, is increased in the Asn M44 Asp and Arg H177 His suppressor RCs with respect to native RCs, and remains comparable to that observed in Asp L213 Asn mutant RCs. Only the Arg M233 Cys suppressor mutation affected the 1728 cm^–1 band, reducing its amplitude to near native level. Thus, there is no clear correlation between the apparent extent of proton uptake by Glu L212 and the recovery of the proton transfer RC function. In all of the mutant spectra, several protein (amide I and amide II) and quinone anion (C...O/C...C) modes are perturbed compared to the spectrum of native RCs. These IR data show that all of the compensatory mutations alter the semiquinone-protein interactions and the backbone providing direct evidence of structural changes accompanying the restoration of efficient proton transfer in RCs containing the Asp L213 Asn lesion.