Effect of the Temperature on Violaxanthin De-Epoxidation: Comparison of the In Vivo and Model Systems

The xanthophyll cycle is a photoprotective mechanism operating in the thylakoid membranes of all higher plants, ferns, mosses and several algal groups. The occurrence of inverted hexagonal domains of monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG) in the membrane is postulated as an essential factor involved in violaxanthin de-epoxidation. The violaxanthin de-epoxidation was investigated in high-light illuminated Lemna trisulca at three temperatures (4, 12, and 25°C). The temperature dependence of this reaction was compared with kinetics of violaxanthin de-epoxidation at the same temperatures in MGDG micelles and in phosphatidylcholine (PC)–MGDG unilamellar liposomes. In both model systems and in the illuminated plants, a decrease in temperature resulted in lower zeaxanthin production. We found that the presence of MGDG in PC liposomes was necessary for the de-epoxidation reaction. With the increase in MGDG proportion in liposomes, the percentage of transformed violaxanthin was also increasing. We suggest that the violaxanthin de-epoxidation takes place within lipid matrix of the thylakoid membranes inside the MGDG-rich domains. Presence of the reversed hexagonal phase in the thylakoid membranes has been already reported in our previous papers and by other authors using ³¹P-NMR and freeze-fracturing techniques.     

A mathematical model describing kinetics of conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin via intermediate antheraxanthin by the xanthophyll cycle enzyme violaxanthin de-epoxidase

The xanthophyll cycle is one of the mechanisms protecting the photosynthetic apparatus against the light energy excess. Its action is still not well understood on the molecular level.Our model makes it possible to follow independently the kinetics of the two de-epoxidation steps occurring in the xanthophyll cycle: the conversion of violaxanthin into antheraxanthin and the conversion of antheraxanthin into zeaxanthin. Using a simple form of the transition rates of these two conversions, we model the time evolution of the concentration pattern of violaxanthin, antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin during the de-epoxidation process. The model has been applied to describe the reactions of de-epoxidation in a system of liposome membranes composed of phosphatidylcholine and monogalactosyldiacylglycerol. Results obtained within the model fit very well with the experimental data. Values of the transition probabilities of the violaxanthin conversion into antheraxanthin and the antheraxanthin conversion into zeaxanthin calculated by means of the model indicate that the first stage of the de-epoxidation process is much slower than the second one.     

Effect of monogalactosyldiacylglycerol and other thylakoid lipids on violaxanthin de-epoxidation in liposomes

In this study we present evidence that one of two reactions of the xanthophyll cycle, violaxanthin de-epoxidation, may occur in unilamellar egg phosphatidylcholine vesicles supplemented with monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG). Activity of violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE) in this system was found to be strongly dependent on the content of MGDG in the membrane; however, only to a level of 30 mol%. Above this concentration the rate of violaxanthin de-epoxidation decreased. The effect of individual thylakoid lipids on VDE-independent violaxanthin transformation was also investigated and unspecific effects of phosphatidylglycerol and sulphoquinovosyldiacyglycerol, probably related to the acidic character of these lipids, were found. The presented results suggest that violaxanthin de-epoxidation most probably takes place inside MGDG-rich domains of the thylakoid membrane. The described activity of the violaxanthin de-epoxidation reaction in liposomes opens new possibilities in the investigation of the xanthophyll cycle and may contribute to a better understanding of this process.     

Membrane curvature stress controls the maximal conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin in the violaxanthin cycle--influence of alpha-tocopherol, cetylethers, linolenic acid, and temperature

Zeaxanthin, an important component in protection against overexcitation in higher plants, is formed from violaxanthin by the enzyme violaxanthin de-epoxidase. We have investigated factors that may control the maximal degree of conversion in the violaxanthin cycle. The conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin in isolated spinach thylakoids was followed at different temperatures and in the presence of lipid packing modifiers. The maximum degree of conversion was found to be 35%, 70% and 80% at 4 degrees C, 25 degrees C and 37 degrees C respectively. In the presence of membrane modifying agents, known to promote non-lamellar structures (H(II)), such as linolenic acid the conversion increased, and the maximal level of violaxanthin de-epoxidation obtained was close to 100%. In contrast, substances promoting lamellar phases (L(alpha)), such as alpha-tocopherol and 8-cetylether (C(16)EO(8)), only 55% and 35% of the violaxanthin was converted at 25 degrees C, respectively. The results are interpreted in light of the lipid composition of the thylakoid membrane, and we propose a model where a negative curvature elastic stress in the thylakoid lipid bilayer is required for violaxanthin de-epoxidase activity. In this model zeaxanthin with its longer hydrophobic stretch is proposed to promote lamellar arrangements of the membrane. As a result, zeaxanthin relieves the curvature elastic stress, which in turn leads to inactivation of violaxanthin de-epoxidase.     

Membrane curvature stress controls the maximal conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin in the violaxanthin cycle—influence of α-tocopherol, cetylethers, linolenic acid, and temperature

Zeaxanthin, an important component in protection against overexcitation in higher plants, is formed from violaxanthin by the enzyme violaxanthin de-epoxidase. We have investigated factors that may control the maximal degree of conversion in the violaxanthin cycle. The conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin in isolated spinach thylakoids was followed at different temperatures and in the presence of lipid packing modifiers. The maximum degree of conversion was found to be 35%, 70% and 80% at 4 °C, 25 °C and 37 °C respectively. In the presence of membrane modifying agents, known to promote non-lamellar structures (H_II), such as linolenic acid the conversion increased, and the maximal level of violaxanthin de-epoxidation obtained was close to 100%. In contrast, substances promoting lamellar phases (L_α), such as α-tocopherol and 8-cetylether (C₁₆EO₈), only 55% and 35% of the violaxanthin was converted at 25 °C, respectively. The results are interpreted in light of the lipid composition of the thylakoid membrane, and we propose a model where a negative curvature elastic stress in the thylakoid lipid bilayer is required for violaxanthin de-epoxidase activity. In this model zeaxanthin with its longer hydrophobic stretch is proposed to promote lamellar arrangements of the membrane. As a result, zeaxanthin relieves the curvature elastic stress, which in turn leads to inactivation of violaxanthin de-epoxidase.     

Functional roles of the major chloroplast lipids in the violaxanthin cycle

Monogalactosyldiacylglyceride (MGDG) and digalactosyldiacylglyceride (DGDG) are the major membrane lipids of chloroplasts. The question of the specialized functions of these unique lipids has received limited attention. One function is to support violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE) activity, an enzyme of the violaxanthin cycle. To understand better the properties of this system, the effects of galactolipids and phosphatidylcholines on VDE activity were examined by two independent methods. The results show that the micelle-forming lipid (MGDG) and bilayer forming lipids (DGDG and phosphatidylcholines) support VDE activity differently. MGDG supported rapid and complete de-epoxidation starting at a threshold lipid concentration (10 μM) coincident with complete solubilization of violaxanthin. In contrast, DGDG supported slow but nevertheless complete to nearly complete de-epoxidation at a lower lipid concentration (6.7 μM) that did not completely solubilize violaxanthin. Phosphotidylcholines showed similar effects as DGDG except that de-epoxidation was incomplete. Since VDE requires solubilized violaxanthin, aggregated violaxanthin in DGDG at low concentration must become solubilized as de-epoxidation proceeds. High lipid concentrations had lower activity possibly due to formation of multilayered structures (liposomes) that restrict accessibility of violaxanthin to VDE. MGDG micelles do not present such restrictions. The results indicate VDE operates throughout the lipid phase of the single bilayer thylakoid membrane and is not limited to putative MGDG micelle domains. Additionally, the results also explain the differential partitioning of violaxanthin between the envelope and thylakoid as due to the relative solubilities of violaxanthin and zeaxanthin in MGDG, DGDG and phospholipids. The violaxanthin cycle is hypothesized to be a linked system of the thylakoid and envelope for signal transduction of light stress.     

Violaxanthin de-epoxidase, the xanthophyll cycle enzyme, requires lipid inverted hexagonal structures for its activity

Bilayer-forming lipids were shown to be ineffective in sustaining the enzymatic activity of violaxanthin de-epoxidase. On the other hand, non-bilayer-forming lipids, regardless of their different chemical character, ensured high activity of violaxanthin de-epoxidase, resulting in conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin. Our data indicates that the presence of lipids forming reversed hexagonal structures is necessary for violaxanthin de-epoxidase activity and this activity is dependent on the degree of unsaturation of the fatty acids. The significance of the reversed hexagonal phase domains in the conversion of violaxanthin into zeaxanthin in model systems and in the native thylakoid membranes is discussed.     

Lipid dependence of diadinoxanthin solubilization and de-epoxidation in artificial membrane systems resembling the lipid composition of the natural thylakoid membrane

In the present study, the solubility and enzymatic de-epoxidation of diadinoxanthin (Ddx) was investigated in three different artificial membrane systems: (1) Unilamellar liposomes composed of different concentrations of the bilayer forming lipid phosphatidylcholine (PC) and the inverted hexagonal phase (H(II) phase) forming lipid monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG), (2) liposomes composed of PC and the H(II) phase forming lipid phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and (3) an artificial membrane system composed of digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG) and MGDG, which resembles the lipid composition of the natural thylakoid membrane. Our results show that Ddx de-epoxidation strongly depends on the concentration of the inverted hexagonal phase forming lipids MGDG or PE in the liposomes composed of PC or DGDG, thus indicating that the presence of inverted hexagonal structures is essential for Ddx de-epoxidation. The difference observed for the solubilization of Ddx in H(II) phase forming lipids compared with bilayer forming lipids indicates that Ddx is not equally distributed in the liposomes composed of different concentrations of bilayer versus non-bilayer lipids. In artificial membranes with a high percentage of bilayer lipids, a large part of Ddx is located in the membrane bilayer. In membranes composed of equal proportions of bilayer and H(II) phase forming lipids, the majority of the Ddx molecules is located in the inverted hexagonal structures. The significance of the pigment distribution and the three-dimensional structure of the H(II) phase for the de-epoxidation reaction is discussed, and a possible scenario for the lipid dependence of Ddx (and violaxanthin) de-epoxidation in the native thylakoid membrane is proposed.     

Lipid dependence of diadinoxanthin solubilization and de-epoxidation in artificial membrane systems resembling the lipid composition of the natural thylakoid membrane

In the present study, the solubility and enzymatic de-epoxidation of diadinoxanthin (Ddx) was investigated in three different artificial membrane systems: (1) Unilamellar liposomes composed of different concentrations of the bilayer forming lipid phosphatidylcholine (PC) and the inverted hexagonal phase (H_II phase) forming lipid monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG), (2) liposomes composed of PC and the H_II phase forming lipid phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and (3) an artificial membrane system composed of digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG) and MGDG, which resembles the lipid composition of the natural thylakoid membrane. Our results show that Ddx de-epoxidation strongly depends on the concentration of the inverted hexagonal phase forming lipids MGDG or PE in the liposomes composed of PC or DGDG, thus indicating that the presence of inverted hexagonal structures is essential for Ddx de-epoxidation. The difference observed for the solubilization of Ddx in H_II phase forming lipids compared with bilayer forming lipids indicates that Ddx is not equally distributed in the liposomes composed of different concentrations of bilayer versus non-bilayer lipids. In artificial membranes with a high percentage of bilayer lipids, a large part of Ddx is located in the membrane bilayer. In membranes composed of equal proportions of bilayer and H_II phase forming lipids, the majority of the Ddx molecules is located in the inverted hexagonal structures. The significance of the pigment distribution and the three-dimensional structure of the H_II phase for the de-epoxidation reaction is discussed, and a possible scenario for the lipid dependence of Ddx (and violaxanthin) de-epoxidation in the native thylakoid membrane is proposed.     

The main thylakoid membrane lipid monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG) promotes the de-epoxidation of violaxanthin associated with the light-harvesting complex of photosystem II (LHCII)

In higher plants, the major part of the xanthophyll cycle pigment violaxanthin (Vx) is non-covalently bound to the main light-harvesting complex of PSII (LHCII). Under saturating light conditions Vx has to be released from its binding site into the surrounding lipid phase, where it is converted to zeaxanthin (Zx) by the enzyme Vx de-epoxidase (VDE). In the present study we investigated the influence of thylakoid lipids on the de-epoxidation of Vx, which was still associated with the LHCII. We isolated LHCII with different concentrations of native, endogenous lipids and Vx by sucrose gradient centrifugation or successive cation precipitation. Analysis of the different LHCII preparations showed that the concentration of LHCII-associated Vx was correlated with the concentration of the main thylakoid lipid monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG) associated with the complexes. Decreases in the MGDG content of the LHCII led to a diminished Vx concentration, indicating that a part of the total Vx pool was located in an MGDG phase surrounding the LHCII, whereas another part was bound to the LHCII apoproteins. We further studied the convertibility of LHCII-associated Vx in in-vitro enzyme assays by addition of isolated VDE. We observed an efficient and almost complete Vx conversion in the LHCII fractions containing high amounts of endogenous MGDG. LHCII preparations with low concentrations of MGDG exhibited a strongly reduced Vx de-epoxidation, which could be increased by addition of exogenous, pure MGDG. The de-epoxidation of LHCII-associated Vx was saturated at a much lower concentration of native, endogenous MGDG compared with the concentration of isolated, exogenous MGDG, which is needed for optimal VDE activity in in-vitro assays employing pure isolated Vx.     

Laurdan fluorescence spectroscopy in the thylakoid bilayer: the effect of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin conversion on the galactolipid dominated lipid environment

Laurdan (6-lauroyl-2-dimethylaminonaphthalene) fluorescence spectroscopy has been applied to probe the physical status of the thylakoid membrane upon conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin. So far, only phospholipid-dominated membranes have been studied by this method and hereby we report the first use of laurdan in mono- and digalactosyldiacylglycerol-dominated membrane systems. The generalised polarisation (GP) of laurdan was used as a measure of the structural effect of xanthophyll cycle pigments in isolated spinach (Spinacia oleracea) thylakoids and in model membrane vesicles composed of chloroplast galactolipids. Higher GP values indicate a membrane in a more ordered structure, whereas lower GP values point to a membrane in a less ordered fluid phase. The method was used to probe the effect of violaxanthin and zeaxanthin in thylakoid membranes at different temperatures. At 4, 25 and 37 degrees C the GP values for dark-adapted thylakoids in the violaxanthin-form were 0.55, 0.28 and 0.26. After conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin, at the same temperatures, the GP values were 0.62, 0.36 and 0.34, respectively. GP values increased gradually upon conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin. Similar results were obtained in the liposomal systems in the presence of these xanthophyll cycle pigments. We conclude from these results that the conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin makes the thylakoid membrane more ordered.     

Laurdan fluorescence spectroscopy in the thylakoid bilayer: The effect of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin conversion on the galactolipid dominated lipid environment

Laurdan (6-lauroyl-2-dimethylaminonaphthalene) fluorescence spectroscopy has been applied to probe the physical status of the thylakoid membrane upon conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin. So far, only phospholipid-dominated membranes have been studied by this method and hereby we report the first use of laurdan in mono- and digalactosyldiacylglycerol-dominated membrane systems. The generalised polarisation (GP) of laurdan was used as a measure of the structural effect of xanthophyll cycle pigments in isolated spinach (Spinacia oleracea) thylakoids and in model membrane vesicles composed of chloroplast galactolipids. Higher GP values indicate a membrane in a more ordered structure, whereas lower GP values point to a membrane in a less ordered fluid phase. The method was used to probe the effect of violaxanthin and zeaxanthin in thylakoid membranes at different temperatures. At 4, 25 and 37 °C the GP values for dark-adapted thylakoids in the violaxanthin-form were 0.55, 0.28 and 0.26. After conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin, at the same temperatures, the GP values were 0.62, 0.36 and 0.34, respectively. GP values increased gradually upon conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin. Similar results were obtained in the liposomal systems in the presence of these xanthophyll cycle pigments. We conclude from these results that the conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin makes the thylakoid membrane more ordered.     

Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide alters the pH dependence of violaxanthin de-epoxidation

The de-epoxidation of violaxanthin to antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin in the xanthophyll cycle of higher plants is controlled by the pH of the thylakoid lumen. The influence of N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD) on the pH dependence of the de-epoxidation reactions has been investigated in isolated pea thylakoids. In the presence of DCCD, the decrease in de-epoxidase activity at increasing pH was found to be shifted by about 0.3 pH units to more-alkaline pH values. This was paralleled by a less-pronounced cooperativity for the pH dependence of de-epoxidation. Comparative studies with antenna-depleted thylakoids from plants grown in intermittent light and with unstacked thylakoids indicated that binding of DCCD to antenna proteins is most probably not responsible for the altered pH dependence. Analyses of the zeaxanthin content of different antenna subcomplexes showed that the DCCD-induced de-epoxidation at high pH leads to zeaxanthin formation in all antenna proteins from both photosystems. Our data support the view that DCCD binding to the violaxanthin de-epoxidase may be responsible for the altered pH dependence. Received: 4 July 1998 / Accepted: 9 September 1998     

Comparison of violaxanthin de-epoxidation from the stroma and lumen sides of isolated thylakoid membranes from Arabidopsis: implications for the mechanism of de-epoxidation

The enzyme violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VxDE) is localized in the thylakoid lumen and catalyzes the de-epoxidation of membrane-bound violaxanthin (Vx) to zeaxanthin. De-epoxidation from the opposite, stroma side of the membrane has been investigated in the npq1 mutant from Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. - which lacks VxDE - by adding partially purified VxDE from spinach thylakoids. The accessibility of Vx to the exogenously added enzyme (exoVxDE) and the kinetics of Vx conversion by the exoVxDE in thylakoids from npq1 plants were very similar to the characteristics of Vx conversion by the endogenous enzyme (endoVxDE) in thylakoids from wild-type plants. However, the conversion of Vx by exoVxDE was clearly retarded at lower temperatures when compared with the reaction catalyzed by endoVxDE. Since the exoVxDE - in contrast to the endoVxDE - has no access to the stacked regions of the membrane, where the xanthophylls bound to photosystem II are located, these results support the assumption of pronounced diffusion of xanthophylls within the thylakoid membrane.     

De-epoxidation of violaxanthin in the minor antenna proteins of photosystem II, LHCB4, LHCB5, and LHCB6

The conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin is essentially required for the pH-regulated dissipation of excess light energy in the antenna of photosystem II. Violaxanthin is bound to each of the antenna proteins of both photosystems. Former studies with recombinant Lhcb1 and different Lhca proteins implied that each antenna protein contributes specifically to violaxanthin conversion related to protein-specific affinities of the different violaxanthin binding sites. We investigated the violaxanthin de-epoxidation in the minor antenna proteins of photosystem II, Lhcb4-6. Recombinant proteins were reconstituted with different xanthophyll mixtures to study the conversion of violaxanthin at different xanthophyll binding sites in these proteins. The extent and kinetics of violaxanthin de-epoxidation were found to be dependent on the respective protein and, for each protein, also on the binding site of violaxanthin. In particular, violaxanthin bound to Lhcb4 was nearly inconvertible for de-epoxidation, whereas violaxanthin bound to Lhcb5 was fully convertible but with slow kinetics. Lhcb6 exhibited heterogeneous violaxanthin conversion characteristics, which could be assigned to different populations of reconstituted Lhcb6 complexes with respect to violaxanthin binding sites. The results support the proposed different binding affinities of violaxanthin to the three putative violaxanthin binding sites (V1, N1, and L2) in antenna proteins. Under consideration of former studies with Lhcb1 and Lhca proteins, the data imply that violaxanthin bound to the V1 and N1 binding site of antenna proteins is easily accessible for de-epoxidation in all antenna proteins, whereas violaxanthin bound to L2 is either only slowly or not convertible to zeaxanthin, depending on the respective protein.     

Mechanism and regulation of the violaxanthin cycle: The role of antenna proteins and membrane lipids

The violaxanthin cycle describes the reversible conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin via the intermediate antheraxanthin. This light-dependent xanthophyll conversion is essential for the adaptation of plants and algae to different light conditions and allows a reversible switch of photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes between a light-harvesting state under low light and a dissipative state under high light. The photoprotective functions of zeaxanthin have been intensively studied during the last decade, but much less attention has been directed to the mechanism and regulation of xanthophyll conversion. In this review, an overview is given on recent progress in the understanding of the role of (i) xanthophyll binding by antenna proteins and of (ii) the lipid properties of the thylakoid membrane in the regulation of xanthophyll conversion. The consequences of these findings for the mechanism and regulation of xanthophyll conversion in the thylakoid membrane will be discussed.     

The xanthophyll cycle - molecular mechanism and physiological significance

The light-dependent, cyclic changes of xanthophyll pigments: violaxanthin, antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin, called the xanthophyll cycle, have been known for about fifty years. This process was characterised for higher plants, several fern and moss species and in some algal groups. Two enzymes, violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE) and zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZE), belonging to the lipocalin protein family, are engaged in the xanthophyll cycle. VDE requires for its activity ascorbic acid and reversed hexagonal structure formed by monogalactosyldiacylglycerol. ZE, postulated to be a flavoprotein, has not been purified yet and it is known from its gene sequence only. Zeaxanthin epoxidation is dependent on the reducing power of NADPH and presence of additional proteins. The xanthophyll cycle is postulated to play a role in many important physiological processes. Zeaxanthin, formed from violaxanthin under high light conditions, is thought to be a main photoprotector in autotrophic cells due to its ability to dissipate excess of absorbed light energy that can be measured as a non-photochemical quenching. In addition the zeaxanthin formation is important in protection of the thylakoid membranes against lipid peroxidation. Other postulated functions of the xanthophyll cycle, which include regulation of membrane physical properties, blue light reception and regulation of abscisic acid synthesis, are also discussed.     

De-epoxidation of violaxanthin after reconstitution into different carotenoid binding sites of light-harvesting complex II

In higher plants, the de-epoxidation of violaxanthin (Vx) to antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin is required for the pH-dependent dissipation of excess light energy as heat and by that process plays an important role in the protection against photo-oxidative damage. The de-epoxidation reaction was investigated in an in vitro system using reconstituted light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) and a thylakoid raw extract enriched in the enzyme Vx de-epoxidase. Reconstitution of LHCII with varying carotenoids was performed to replace lutein and/or neoxanthin, which are bound to the native complex, by Vx. Recombinant LHCII containing either 2 lutein and 1 Vx or 1.6 Vx and 1.1 neoxanthin or 2.8 Vx per monomer were studied. Vx de-epoxidation was inducible for all complexes after the addition of Vx de-epoxidase but to different extents and with different kinetics in each complex. Analysis of the kinetics indicated that the three possible Vx binding sites have at least two, and perhaps three, specific rate constants for de-epoxidation. In particular, Vx bound to one of the two lutein binding sites of the native complex, most likely L1, was not at all or only at a slow rate convertible to Zx. In reisolated LHCII, newly formed Zx almost stoichiometrically replaced the transformed Vx, indicating that LHCII and Vx de-epoxidase stayed in close contact during the de-epoxidation reactions and that no release of carotenoids occurred.     

De-epoxidation of violaxanthin in light-harvesting complex I proteins

The conversion of violaxanthin (Vx) to zeaxanthin (Zx) in the de-epoxidation reaction of the xanthophyll cycle plays an important role in the protection of chloroplasts against photooxidative damage. Vx is bound to the antenna proteins of both photosystems. In photosystem II, the formation of Zx is essential for the pH-dependent dissipation of excess light energy as heat. The function of Zx in photosystem I is still unclear. In this work we investigated the de-epoxidation characteristics of light-harvesting complex proteins of photosystem I (LHCI) under in vivo and in vitro conditions. Recombinant LHCI (Lhcal-4) proteins were reconstituted with Vx and lutein, and the convertibility of Vx was studied in an in vitro assay using partially purified Vx de-epoxidase isolated from spinach thylakoids. All four LHCI proteins exhibited unique de-epoxidation characteristics. An almost complete Vx conversion to Zx was observed only in Lhca3, whereas Zx formation in the other LHCI proteins decreased in the order Lhca4 > Lhca1 > Lhca2. Most likely, these differences in Vx de-epoxidation were related to the different accessibility of the respective carotenoid binding sites in the distinct antenna proteins. The results indicate that Vx bound to site V1 and N1 is easily accessible for de-epoxidation, whereas Vx bound to L2 is only partially and/or with the slower kinetics convertible to Zx. The de-epoxidation properties determined for the monomeric recombinant proteins were consistent with those obtained for isolated native LHCI-730 and LHCI-680 in the same in vitro assay and the de-epoxidation state found under in vivo conditions in native LHCIs.     

Role of hexagonal structure-forming lipids in diadinoxanthin and violaxanthin solubilization and de-epoxidation

In this study, we have examined the influence of different lipids on the solubility of the xanthophyll cycle pigments diadinoxanthin (Ddx) and violaxanthin (Vx) and on the efficiency of Ddx and Vx de-epoxidation by the enzymes Vx de-epoxidase (VDE) from wheat and Ddx de-epoxidase (DDE) from the diatom Cyclotella meneghiniana, respectively. Our results show that the lipids MGDG and PE are able to solubilize both xanthophyll cycle pigments in an aqueous medium. Substrate solubilization is essential for de-epoxidase activity, because in the absence of MGDG or PE Ddx and Vx are present in an aggregated form, with limited accessibility for DDE and VDE. Our results also show that the hexagonal structure-forming lipids MGDG and PE are able to solubilize Ddx and Vx at much lower lipid concentrations than bilayer-forming lipids DGDG and PC. We furthermore found that, in the presence of MGDG or PE, Ddx is much more solubilizable than Vx. This substantial difference in Ddx and Vx solubility directly affects the respective de-epoxidation reactions. Ddx de-epoxidation by the diatom DDE is saturated at much lower MGDG or PE concentrations than Vx de-epoxidation by the higher-plant VDE. Another important result of our study is that bilayer-forming lipids DGDG and PC are not able to induce efficient xanthophyll de-epoxidation. Even in the presence of high concentrations of DGDG or PC, where Ddx and Vx are completely solubilized, a strongly inhibited Ddx de-epoxidation is observed, while Vx de-epoxidation by VDE is completely absent. This indicates that the inverted hexagonal phase domains provided by lipid MGDG or PE are essential for de-epoxidase activity. We conclude that in the natural thylakoid membrane MGDG serves to solubilize the xanthophyll cycle pigments and furthermore provides inverted hexagonal structures associated with the membrane bilayer, which are essential for efficient xanthophyll de-epoxidase activity.