Centriole inheritance

Early cell biologists perceived centrosomes to be permanent cellular structures. Centrosomes were observed to reproduce once each cycle and to orchestrate assembly a transient mitotic apparatus that segregated chromosomes and a centrosome to each daughter at the completion of cell division. Centrosomes are composed of a pair of centrioles buried in a complex pericentriolar matrix. The bulk of microtubules in cells lie with one end buried in the pericentriolar matrix and the other extending outward into the cytoplasm. Centrioles recruit and organize pericentriolar material. As a result, centrioles dominate microtubule organization and spindle assembly in cells born with centrosomes. Centrioles duplicate in concert with chromosomes during the cell cycle. At the onset of mitosis, sibling centrosomes separate and establish a bipolar spindle that partitions a set of chromosomes and a centrosome to each daughter cell at the completion of mitosis and cell division. Centriole inheritance has historically been ascribed to a template mechanism in which the parental centriole contributed to, if not directed, assembly of a single new centriole once each cell cycle. It is now clear that neither centrioles nor centrosomes are essential to cell proliferation. This review examines the recent literature on inheritance of centrioles in animal cells.Key words: centrosome, centriol, spindle, mitosis, microtubule, cell cycle, checkpoints     

Exploring the evolutionary history of centrosomes

The centrosome is the main organizer of the microtubule cytoskeleton in animals, higher fungi and several other eukaryotic lineages. Centrosomes are usually located at the centre of cell in tight association with the nuclear envelope and duplicate at each cell cycle. Despite a great structural diversity between the different types of centrosomes, they are functionally equivalent and share at least some of their molecular components. In this paper, we explore the evolutionary origin of the different centrosomes, in an attempt to understand whether they are derived from an ancestral centrosome or evolved independently from the motile apparatus of distinct flagellated ancestors. We then discuss the evolution of centrosome structure and function within the animal lineage.     

Centrosome function in normal and tumor cells

Centrosomes nucleate microtubules that form the mitotic spindle and regulate the equal division of chromosomes during cell division. In cancer, centrosomes are often found amplified to greater than two per cell, and these tumor cells frequently have aneuploid genomes. In this review, we will discuss the cellular factors that regulate the proper duplication of the centrosome and how these regulatory steps can lead to abnormal centrosome numbers and abnormal mitoses. In particular, we highlight the newly emerging role of the Breast Cancer 1 (BRCA1) ubiquitin ligase in this process.     

Generation and Characterization of a Tissue‐Specific Centrosome Indicator Mouse Line

Centrosomes are major microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs) that play an important role in chromosome segregation during cell division. Centrosomes provide a stable anchor for microtubules, constituting the centers of the spindle poles in mitotic cells, and determining the orientation of cell division. However, visualization of centrosomes is challenging because of their small size. Especially in mouse tissues, it has been extremely challenging to observe centrosomes belonging to a specific cell type of interest among multiple comingled cell types. To overcome this obstacle, we generated a tissue‐specific centrosome indicator. In this mouse line, a construct containing a floxed neomyocin resistance gene with a triplicate polyA sequence followed by an EGFP‐Centrin1 fusion cassette was knocked into the Rosa locus. Upon Cre‐mediated excision, EGFP‐Centrin1 was expressed under the control of the Rosa locus. Experiments utilizing mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) demonstrated the feasibility of real‐time imaging, and showed that EGFP‐Centrin1 expression mirrored the endogenous centrosome cycle, undergoing precisely one round of duplication through the cell cycle. Moreover, experiments using embryo and adult mouse tissues demonstrated that EGFP‐Centrin1 specifically mirrors the localization of endogenous centrosomes. genesis 54:286–296, 2016. © 2016 The Authors. Genesis Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

HOPS is an essential constituent of centrosome assembly

Centrosomes direct microtubule organization during cell division. Aberrant number of centrosomes results from alteration of its components and leads to abnormal mitoses and chromosome instability. HOPS is a newly discovered protein isolated during liver regeneration, implicated in cell proliferation. Here, we provide evidence that HOPS is an integral constituent of centrosomes. HOPS is associated with classical markers of centrosomes and found in cytosolic complexes containing CRM-1, γ-tubulin, eEF-1A and HSP70. These features suggest that HOPS is involved in centrosome assembly and maintenance. HOPS depletion generates supernumerary centrosomes, multinucleated cells and multipolar spindle formation leading to activation of p53 checkpoint and cell cycle arrest. The presence of HOPS in cytosolic complexes supports that centrosome proteins might be preassembled in the cytoplasm to then be rapidly recruited for centrosome duplication. Altogether these data show HOPS implication in the control of cell division. HOPS contribution appears relevant to understand genomic instability and centrosome amplification in cancer.     

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase localizes to the centrosomes and chromosomes

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) takes part mainly in regulation of DNA repair, thereby maintaining genomic stability in the nucleus. However, what role PARP plays in mitotic cells is not known. Centrosomes play an important role in maintaining the fidelity of chromosome distribution during cell division. Loss of these functions might cause chromosomal instability and aneuploidy. p53 and BRCA1 were recently found to localize to the centrosome at mitosis. We found that PARP is localized to the centrosomes and the chromosomes at cell-division phase and interphase by indirect immunofluorescence. Furthermore, by analysis of isolated centrosomes PARP protein was found to associate with the centrosomes during mitosis. These data suggest that PARP may be involved in maintenance of chromosomal stability.     

Drosophila centrosomes are unable to trigger parthenogenetic development of Xenopus eggs

Centrosomes are powerful and exclusive parthenogenetic agents in the Xenopus egg. We have previously shown that heterologous centrosomes from various vertebrate species were able to promote egg cleavage in Xenopus and that human centrosome activity was associated with an insoluble proteinacious structure that is not significantly simpler than the native centrosome. In this work, we have investigated the parthenogenetic capacity of more evolutionary distant centrosomes. We show that centrosomes devoid of centrioles, such as SPBs isolated from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, do not form asters of microtubules in cytoplasmic extracts from Xenopus eggs, and are inactive in the parthenogenetic test. We further show that Drosophila centrosomes which possess a typical centriole architecture, and are quite active to nucleate microtubules in Xenopus cytoplasmic extracts, are unable to trigger egg cleavage. This was observed both with centrosomes isolated from Drosophila syncytial embryos and nucleus-centrosome complexes from the Drosophila Kc23 cell line. We demonstrate that this inability could not be restored after pre-incubation of Drosophila centrosomes in the egg cytoplasm before injection. We conclude that the parthenogenetic activity of a centrosome is not directly linked to its capacity to nucleate microtubules from the egg tubulin, and that the evolutionary conserved nine-fold symmetrical structure of the centriole cannot be considered as sufficient for triggering procentriole assembly.     

Centrosomes: The good and the bad for brain development

Centrosomes nucleate and organise the microtubule cytoskeleton in animal cells. These membraneless organelles are key structures for tissue organisation, polarity and growth. Centrosome dysfunction, defined as deviation in centrosome numbers and/or structural integrity, has major impact on brain size and functionality, as compared with other tissues of the organism. In this review, we discuss the contribution of centrosomes to brain growth during development. We discuss in particular the impact of centrosome dysfunction in Drosophila and mammalian neural stem cell division and fitness, which ultimately underlie brain growth defects.     

Functional role of centrosomes in spindle assembly and organization

The centrosome is the main MT organizing center in animal cells, and has traditionally been regarded as essential for organization of the bipolar spindle that facilitates chromosome segregation during mitosis. Centrosomes are associated with the poles of the mitotic spindle, and several cell types require these organelles for spindle formation. However, most plant cells and some female meiotic systems get along without this organelle, and centrosome‐independent spindle assembly has now been identified within some centrosome containing cells. How can such observations, which point to mutually incompatible conclusions regarding the requirement of centrosomes in spindle formation, be interpreted? With emphasis on the functional role of centrosomes, this article summarizes the current models of spindle formation, and outlines how observations obtained from spindle assembly assays in vitro may reconcile conflicting opinions about the mechanism of spindle assembly. It is further described how Drosophila mutants are used to address the functional interrelationships between individual centrosomal proteins and spindle formation in vivo. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Centrosomes and tumour suppressors

Centrosomes are microtubule organising centres that act as spindle poles during mitosis. Recent work implicates centrosomes in many other processes, and shows that centrosome defects can cause genetic instability. Many regulators of mammalian centrosome function were predicted from studies of model systems. Surprisingly, some well-known tumour suppressors have recently been found at centrosomes, where they influence centrosome duplication and function, suggesting that control of centrosome function is central to genetic stability.     

The role of centrosomes in fertilization,cell division and establishment of asymmetry during embryo development

Centrosomes play significant central roles during reproduction, cell division, embryo development and stem cell biology, and a wealth of new information has been accumulated during the past decade that spans molecular details and newly discovered functions/dysfunctions for specific centrosome proteins in various cellular activities. The present review will focus on the current state of knowledge on the role of germ cell centrosomes during fertilization, formation of the zygote centrosome, centrosome duplication and separation during first embryonic cell division, and asymmetric cell divisions during cell differentiation and subsequent embryo development. It will also address asymmetric cell division in stem cells and formation of the primary cilium during embryo development.     

Zygotic development without functional mitotic centrosomes

The centrosome is the dominant microtubule-organizing center in animal cells. At the onset of mitosis, each cell normally has two centrosomes that lie on opposite sides of the nucleus. Centrosomes nucleate the growth of microtubules and orchestrate the efficient assembly of the mitotic spindle. Recent studies in vivo and in vitro have shown that the spindle can form even in the absence of centrosomes and demonstrate that individual cells can divide without this organelle. However, since centrosomes are involved in multiple processes in vivo, including polarized cell divisions, which are an essential developmental mechanism for producing differentiated cell types, it remains to be shown whether or not a complete organism can develop without centrosomes. Here we show that in Drosophila a centrosomin (cnn) null mutant, which fails to assemble fully functional mitotic centrosomes and has few or no detectable astral microtubules, can develop into an adult fly. These results challenge long-held assumptions that the centrosome and the astral microtubules emanating from it are essential for development and are required specifically for spindle orientation during asymmetric cell divisions.     

Centrosome amplification can initiate tumorigenesis in flies

Centrosome amplification is a common feature of many cancer cells, and it has been previously proposed that centrosome amplification can drive genetic instability and so tumorigenesis. To test this hypothesis, we generated Drosophila lines that have extra centrosomes in approximately 60% of their somatic cells. Many cells with extra centrosomes initially form multipolar spindles, but these spindles ultimately become bipolar. This requires a delay in mitosis that is mediated by the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). As a result of this delay, there is no dramatic increase in genetic instability in flies with extra centrosomes, and these flies maintain a stable diploid genome over many generations. The asymmetric division of the larval neural stem cells, however, is compromised in the presence of extra centrosomes, and larval brain cells with extra centrosomes can generate metastatic tumors when transplanted into the abdomens of wild-type hosts. Thus, centrosome amplification can initiate tumorigenesis in flies.     

Imaging Centrosomes in Fly Testes

Centrosomes are conserved microtubule-based organelles whose structure and function change dramatically throughout the cell cycle and cell differentiation. Centrosomes are essential to determine the cell division axis during mitosis and to nucleate cilia during interphase. The identity of the proteins that mediate these dynamic changes remains only partially known, and the function of many of the proteins that have been implicated in these processes is still rudimentary. Recent work has shown that Drosophila spermatogenesis provides a powerful system to identify new proteins critical for centrosome function and formation as well as to gain insight into the particular function of known players in centrosome-related processes. Drosophila is an established genetic model organism where mutants in centrosomal genes can be readily obtained and easily analyzed. Furthermore, recent advances in the sensitivity and resolution of light microscopy and the development of robust genetically tagged centrosomal markers have transformed the ability to use Drosophila testes as a simple and accessible model system to study centrosomes. This paper describes the use of genetically-tagged centrosomal markers to perform genetic screens for new centrosomal mutants and to gain insight into the specific function of newly identified genes.     

Behaviour of centrosomes in early Tubifex embryos: asymmetric segregation and mitotic cycle-dependent duplication

An antibody raised against a highly conserved peptide of -tubulin (Joshi et al. 1992) recognized a 50 kDa polypeptide in centrosomes in Tubifex embryos. Centrosomes labelled with this antibody are found at both poles of the first meiotic spindle and at the inner pole of the second meiotic spindle. At the transition to the second meiosis, there is no change in morphology of the centrosomes which are retained in the egg proper. In contrast, as the second meiosis proceeds from anaphase to telophase, centrosomes labelled with the antibody gradually become smaller, but are still recognized as tiny dots; each egg exhibits no more than one tiny dot. The first cleavage spindles exhibit a centrosome at one pole but not at the other. The spindle pole with a centrosome forms an aster which is inherited by the larger cell, CD, of the two-cell embryo; the centrosome-free spindle pole then becomes anastral and is segregated to a smaller cell AB. Centrosomes are present in the C and D cell lineages but not in the A and B lineages, at least up to the eighth cleavage cycle. During cleavage stages, centrosomes duplicate early in telophase of each mitosis, and their size changes in a cell cycle-specific fashion. Centrosomes which otherwise duplicate asynchronously in separate cells do so synchronously in a common cytoplasm. Centrosome duplication is inhibited by nocodazole but not by cytochalasin D. An examination of embryos treated with cycloheximide or aphidicolin also suggests that centrosome duplication during cleavages requires protein synthesis but no DNA replication per se. These results suggest that the centrosome cycle in Tubifex blastomeres is linked to the mitotic cycle more closely than is that in other animals.     

Live analysis of free centrosomes in normal and aphidicolin-treated Drosophila embryos

In a number of embryonic systems, centrosomes that have lost their association with the nuclear envelope and spindle maintain their ability to duplicate and induce astral microtubules. To identify additional activities of free centrosomes, we monitored astral microtubule dynamics by injecting living syncytial Drosophila embryos with fluorescently labeled tubulin. Our recordings follow multiple rounds of free centrosome duplication and separation during the cortical division. The rate and distance of free sister centrosome separation corresponds well with the initial phase of associated centrosome separation. However, the later phase of separation observed for centrosomes associated with a spindle (anaphase B) does not occur. Free centrosome separation regularly occurs on a plane parallel to the plasma membrane. While previous work demonstrated that centrosomes influence cytoskeletal dynamics, this observation suggests that the cortical cytoskeleton regulates the orientation of centrosome separation. Although free centrosomes do not form spindles, they display relatively normal cell cycle-dependent modulations of their astral microtubules. In addition, free centrosome duplication, separation, and modulation of microtubule dynamics often occur in synchrony with neighboring associated centrosomes. These observations suggest that free centrosomes respond normally to local nuclear division signals. Disruption of the cortical nuclear divisions with aphidicolin supports this conclusion; large numbers of abnormal nuclei recede into the interior while their centrosomes remain on the cortex. Following individual free centrosomes through multiple focal planes for 45 min after the injection of aphidicolin reveals that they do not undergo normal modulation of their astral dynamics nor do they undergo multiple rounds of duplication and separation. We conclude that in the absence of normally dividing cortical nuclei many centrosome activities are disrupted and centrosome duplication is extensively delayed. This indicates the presence of a feedback mechanism that creates a dependency relationship between the cortical nuclear cycles and the centrosome cycles.     

Modification of Cul1 regulates its association with proteasomal subunits

Accurate transmission of chromosomes from parent to progeny cell requires assembly of a bipolar spindle. Centrosomes (spindle pole body in yeast) are critical for the biogenesis of this complex mitotic apparatus since they confer bipolarity on the spindle and serve as the site of microtubule polymerization. In each division cycle, the centrosome is duplicated and the sister-centrosomes move away from each other, forming the two poles of the spindle. While the structure and the duplication of centrosomes have been investigated extensively, the understanding of the control of their segregation remains scant. Recent findings are beginning to yield insights into the regulation of centrosome segregation in yeast and its link to the mitotic kinase.     

Nuclear envelope‐associated dynein drives prophase centrosome separation and enables Eg5‐independent bipolar spindle formation

The microtubule motor protein kinesin‐5 (Eg5) provides an outward force on centrosomes, which drives bipolar spindle assembly. Acute inhibition of Eg5 blocks centrosome separation and causes mitotic arrest in human cells, making Eg5 an attractive target for anti‐cancer therapy. Using in vitro directed evolution, we show that human cells treated with Eg5 inhibitors can rapidly acquire the ability to divide in the complete absence of Eg5 activity. We have used these Eg5‐independent cells to study alternative mechanisms of centrosome separation. We uncovered a pathway involving nuclear envelope (NE)‐associated dynein that drives centrosome separation in prophase. This NE‐dynein pathway is essential for bipolar spindle assembly in the absence of Eg5, but also functions in the presence of full Eg5 activity, where it pulls individual centrosomes along the NE and acts in concert with Eg5‐dependent outward pushing forces to coordinate prophase centrosome separation. Together, these results reveal how the forces are produced to drive prophase centrosome separation and identify a novel mechanism of resistance to kinesin‐5 inhibitors.     

From stem cell to embryo without centrioles

Centrosome asymmetry plays a key role in ensuring the asymmetric division of Drosophila neural stem cells (neuroblasts [NBs]) and male germline stem cells (GSCs) [1-3]. In both cases, one centrosome is anchored close to a specific cortical region during interphase, thus defining the orientation of the spindle during the ensuing mitosis. To test whether asymmetric centrosome behavior is a general feature of stem cells, we have studied female GSCs, which divide asymmetrically, producing another GSC and a cystoblast. The cystoblast then divides and matures into an oocyte, a process in which centrosomes exhibit a series of complex behaviors proposed to play a crucial role in oogenesis [4-6]. We show that the interphase centrosome does not define spindle orientation in female GSCs and that DSas-4 mutant GSCs [7], lacking centrioles and centrosomes, invariably divide asymmetrically to produce cystoblasts that proceed normally through oogenesis-remarkably, oocyte specification, microtubule organization, and mRNA localization are all unperturbed. Mature oocytes can be fertilized, but embryos that cannot support centriole replication arrest very early in development. Thus, centrosomes are dispensable for oogenesis but essential for early embryogenesis. These results reveal that asymmetric centrosome behavior is not an essential feature of stem cell divisions.     

Proper recruitment of gamma-tubulin and D-TACC/Msps to embryonic Drosophila centrosomes requires Centrosomin Motif 1

Centrosomes are microtubule-organizing centers and play a dominant role in assembly of the microtubule spindle apparatus at mitosis. Although the individual binding steps in centrosome maturation are largely unknown, Centrosomin (Cnn) is an essential mitotic centrosome component required for assembly of all other known pericentriolar matrix (PCM) proteins to achieve microtubule-organizing activity at mitosis in Drosophila. We have identified a conserved motif (Motif 1) near the amino terminus of Cnn that is essential for its function in vivo. Cnn Motif 1 is necessary for proper recruitment of gamma-tubulin, D-TACC (the homolog of vertebrate transforming acidic coiled-coil proteins [TACC]), and Minispindles (Msps) to embryonic centrosomes but is not required for assembly of other centrosome components including Aurora A kinase and CP60. Centrosome separation and centrosomal satellite formation are severely disrupted in Cnn Motif 1 mutant embryos. However, actin organization into pseudocleavage furrows, though aberrant, remains partially intact. These data show that Motif 1 is necessary for some but not all of the activities conferred on centrosome function by intact Cnn.