Conserved aromatic residues in the transmembrane region VI of the V1a vasopressin receptor differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.

Despite their opposite effects on signal transduction, the nonapeptide hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and its V1a receptor-selective cyclic peptide antagonist d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP display homologous primary structures, differing only at residues 1 and 2. These structural similarities led us to hypothesize that both ligands could interact with the same binding pocket in the V1a receptor. To determine receptor residues responsible for discriminating binding of agonist and antagonist ligands, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of conserved aromatic and hydrophilic residues as well as nonconserved residues, all located in the transmembrane binding pocket of the V1a receptor. Mutation of aromatic residues of transmembrane region VI (W304, F307, F308) reduced affinity for the d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP and markedly decreased affinity for the unrelated strongly hydrophobic V1a-selective nonpeptide antagonist SR 49059. Replacement of these aromatic residues had no effect on AVP binding, but increased AVP-induced coupling efficacy of the receptor for its G protein. Mutating hydrophilic residues Q108, K128 and Q185 in transmembrane regions II, III and IV, respectively, led to a decrease in affinity for both agonists and antagonists. Finally, the nonconserved residues T333 and A334 in transmembrane region VII, controlled the V1a/V2 binding selectivity for both nonpeptide and cyclic peptide antagonists. Thus, because conserved aromatic residues of the V1a receptor binding pocket seem essential for antagonists and do not contribute at all to the binding of agonists, we propose that these residues differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.     

Novel aromatic residues in transmembrane domains IV and V involved in agonist binding at alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors

We examined the role that aromatic residues located in the transmembrane helices of the alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor play in promoting antagonist binding. Since alpha(1)-antagonists display low affinity binding at beta(2)-adrenergic receptors, two phenylalanine residues, Phe-163 and Phe-187, of the alpha(1a)-AR were mutated to the corresponding beta(2)-residue. Neither F163Q nor F187A mutations of the alpha(1a) had any effect on the affinity of the alpha(1)-antagonists. However, the affinity of the endogenous agonist epinephrine was reduced 12.5- and 8-fold by the F163Q and F187A mutations, respectively. An additive loss in affinity (150-fold) for epinephrine was observed at an alpha(1a) containing both mutations. The loss of agonist affinity scenario could be reversed by a gain of affinity with mutation of the corresponding residues in the beta(2) to the phenylalanine residues in the alpha(1a). We propose that both Phe-163 and Phe-187 are involved in independent aromatic interactions with the catechol ring of agonists. The potency but not the efficacy of epinephrine in stimulating phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis was reduced 35-fold at the F163Q/F187A alpha(1a) relative to the wild type receptor. Therefore, Phe-163 and Phe-187 represent novel binding contacts in the agonist binding pocket of the alpha(1a)-AR, but are not involved directly in receptor activation.     

The isolated N-terminal domain of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor binds exendin peptides with much higher affinity than GLP-1

Two fragments of the receptor for glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), each containing the N-terminal domain, were expressed and characterized in either bacterial or mammalian cells. The first fragment, rNT-TM1, included the N-terminal domain and first transmembrane helix and was stably expressed in the membrane of human embryonic kidney 293 cells. The second, 6H-rNT, consisted of only the N-terminal domain of the receptor fused with a polyhistidine tag at its N terminus. The latter fragment was expressed in Escherichia coli in the form of inclusion bodies from which the protein was subsequently purified and refolded in vitro. Although both receptor fragments displayed negligible (125)I-labeled GLP-1(7-36)amide-specific binding, they both displayed high affinity for the radiolabeled peptide antagonist (125)I-exendin-4(9-39). Competition binding studies demonstrated that the N-terminal domain of the GLP-1 receptor maintains high affinity for the agonist exendin-4 as well as the antagonists exendin-4(3-39) and exendin-4(9-39) whereas, in contrast, GLP-1 affinity was greatly reduced. This study shows that although the exendin antagonists are not dependent upon the extracellular loops and transmembrane helices for maintaining their normal high affinity binding, the endogenous agonist GLP-1 requires regions outside of the N-terminal domain. Hence, distinct structural features in exendin-4, between residues 9 and 39, provide additional affinity for the N-terminal domain of the receptor. These data are consistent with a model for the binding of peptide ligands to the GLP-1 receptor in which the central and C-terminal regions of the peptides bind to the N terminus of the receptor, whereas the N-terminal residues of peptide agonists interact with the extracellular loops and transmembrane helices.     

The neurokinin-1 and neurokinin-2 receptor binding sites of MDL103,392 differ

Several small molecule non-peptide antagonists of the NK-1 and NK-2 receptors have been developed. Mutational analysis of the receptor protein sequence has led to the conclusion that the binding site for these non-peptide antagonists lies within the bundle created by transmembrane domains IV–VII of the receptor and differs from the binding sites of peptide agonists and antagonists. The current investigation uses site-directed mutagenesis of the NK-1 and NK-2 receptors to elucidate the amino acids that are important for binding and functional activity of the first potent dual NK-1/NK-2 antagonist MDL103,392. The amino acids found to be important for MDL103,392 binding to the NK-1 receptor are Gln-165, His-197, Leu-203, Ile-204, Phe-264, His-265 and Tyr-272. The amino acids found to be important for MDL103,392 binding to the NK-2 receptor are Gln-166, His-198, Tyr-266 and Tyr-289. While residues in transmembrane (TM) domains IV and V are important in both receptors (Gln-165/166 and His-197/198), residues in TM V and VI are more important for the NK-1 receptor and residues in TM VII play a more important role in the NK-2 receptor. These data are the first report of the analysis of the binding site of a dual tachykinin receptor antagonist and indicate that a single compound (MDL103,392) binds to each receptor in a different manner despite there being a high degree of homology in the transmembrane bundles. In addition, this is the first report in which a model for the binding of a non-peptide antagonist to the NK-2 receptor is proposed.     

Cloning, expression, and characterization of the unique bovine A1 adenosine receptor. Studies on the ligand binding site by site-directed mutagenesis.

The bovine brain A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) is distinct from other A1ARs in that it displays the unique agonist potency series of N6-R-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA) greater than N6-S-phenylisopropyladenosine (S-PIA) greater than 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine and has a 5-10-fold higher affinity for both agonists and antagonists. The cDNA for this receptor has been cloned from a size-selected (2-4-kb) bovine brain library and sequenced. The 2.0-kb cDNA encodes a protein of 326 amino acid residues with a molecular mass of 36,570 daltons. The amino acid sequence fits well into the seven-transmembrane domain motif typical of G protein-coupled receptors. Northern analysis in bovine tissue using the full length cDNA demonstrates mRNAs of 3.4 and 5.7 kb with a tissue distribution consistent with A1AR binding. Subcloning of the cDNA in a pCMV5 expression vector with subsequent transfection into both COS7 and Chinese hamster ovary cells revealed a fully functional A1AR which could inhibit adenylylcyclase and retained the unique pharmacologic properties of the bovine brain A1AR. The A1AR was found to have a single histidine residue in each of transmembrane domains 6 and 7. Histidine residues have been postulated by biochemical studies to be important for ligand binding. Mutation of His-278 to Leu-278 (seventh transmembrane domain) dramatically decreased both agonist and antagonist binding by greater than 90%. In contrast, mutation of His-251 to Leu-251 decreased antagonist affinity and the number of receptors recognized by an antagonist radioligand. In contrast, agonist affinity was not perturbed but the number of receptors detected by an agonist radioligand was also reduced. These data suggest that both histidines are important for both agonist and antagonist binding, but His-278 appears critical for ligand binding to occur.     

Microscopic kinetics and energetics distinguish GABA(A) receptor agonists from antagonists

Although agonists and competitive antagonists presumably occupy overlapping binding sites on ligand-gated channels, these interactions cannot be identical because agonists cause channel opening whereas antagonists do not. One explanation is that only agonist binding performs enough work on the receptor to cause the conformational changes that lead to gating. This idea is supported by agonist binding rates at GABA(A) and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that are slower than expected for a diffusion-limited process, suggesting that agonist binding involves an energy-requiring event. This hypothesis predicts that competitive antagonist binding should require less activation energy than agonist binding. To test this idea, we developed a novel deconvolution-based method to compare binding and unbinding kinetics of GABA(A) receptor agonists and antagonists in outside-out patches from rat hippocampal neurons. Agonist and antagonist unbinding rates were steeply correlated with affinity. Unlike the agonists, three of the four antagonists tested had binding rates that were fast, independent of affinity, and could be accounted for by diffusion- and dehydration-limited processes. In contrast, agonist binding involved additional energy-requiring steps, consistent with the idea that channel gating is initiated by agonist-triggered movements within the ligand binding site. Antagonist binding does not appear to produce such movements, and may in fact prevent them.     

Chemical modification of A1 adenosine receptors in rat brain membranes. Evidence for histidine in different domains of the ligand binding site

Chemical modification of amino acid residues was used to probe the ligand recognition site of A1 adenosine receptors from rat brain membranes. The effect of treatment with group-specific reagents on agonist and antagonist radioligand binding was investigated. The histidine-specific reagent diethylpyrocarbonate (DEP) induced a loss of binding of the agonist R-N6-[3H] phenylisopropyladenosine ([3H]PIA), which could be prevented in part by agonists, but not by antagonists. DEP treatment induced also a loss of binding of the antagonist [3H]8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX). Antagonists protected A1 receptors from this inactivation while agonists did not. This result provided evidence for the existence of at least 2 different histidine residues involved in ligand binding. Consistent with a modification of the binding site, DEP did not alter the affinity of [3H]DPCPX, but reduced receptor number. From the selective protection of [3H] PIA and [3H]DPCPX binding from inactivation, it is concluded that agonists and antagonists occupy different domains at the binding site. Sulfhydryl modifying reagents did not influence antagonist binding, but inhibited agonist binding. This effect is explained by modification of the inhibitory guanine nucleotide binding protein. Pyridoxal 5-phosphate inactivated both [3H]PIA and [3H]DPCPX binding, but the receptors could not be protected from inactivation by ligands. Therefore, no amino group seems to be located at the ligand binding site. In addition, it was shown that no further amino acids with polar side chains are present. The absence of hydrophilic amino acids from the recognition site of the receptor apart from histidine suggests an explanation for the lack of hydrophilic ligands with high affinity for A1 receptors.     

Identification by site-directed mutagenesis of residues involved in ligand recognition and activation of the human A3 adenosine receptor

Ligand recognition has been extensively explored in G protein-coupled A(1), A(2A), and A(2B) adenosine receptors but not in the A(3) receptor, which is cerebroprotective and cardioprotective. We mutated several residues of the human A(3) adenosine receptor within transmembrane domains 3 and 6 and the second extracellular loop, which have been predicted by previous molecular modeling to be involved in the ligand recognition, including His(95), Trp(243), Leu(244), Ser(247), Asn(250), and Lys(152). The N250A mutant receptor lost the ability to bind both radiolabeled agonist and antagonist. The H95A mutation significantly reduced affinity of both agonists and antagonists. In contrast, the K152A (EL2), W243A (6.48), and W243F (6.48) mutations did not significantly affect the agonist binding but decreased antagonist affinity by approximately 3-38-fold, suggesting that these residues were critical for the high affinity of A(3) adenosine receptor antagonists. Activation of phospholipase C by wild type (WT) and mutant receptors was measured. The A(3) agonist 2-chloro-N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)-5'-N-methylcarbamoyladenosine stimulated phosphoinositide turnover in the WT but failed to evoke a response in cells expressing W243A and W243F mutant receptors, in which agonist binding was less sensitive to guanosine 5'-gamma-thiotriphosphate than in WT. Thus, although not important for agonist binding, Trp(243) was critical for receptor activation. The results were interpreted using a rhodopsin-based model of ligand-A(3) receptor interactions.     

Mutagenesis and modeling of the GABAB receptor extracellular domain support a venus flytrap mechanism for ligand binding

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABAB) receptor is distantly related to the metabotropic glutamate receptor-like family of G-protein-coupled receptors (family 3). Sequence comparison revealed that, like metabotropic glutamate receptors, the extracellular domain of the two GABAB receptor splice variants possesses an identical region homologous to the bacterial periplasmic leucine-binding protein (LBP), but lacks the cysteine-rich region common to all other family 3 receptors. A three-dimensional model of the LBP-like domain of the GABAB receptor was constructed based on the known structure of LBP. This model predicts that four of the five cysteine residues found in this GABAB receptor domain are important for its correct folding. This conclusion is supported by analysis of mutations of these Cys residues and a decrease in the thermostability of the binding site after dithiothreitol treatment. Additionally, Ser-246 was found to be critical for CGP64213 binding. Interestingly, this residue aligns with Ser-79 of LBP, which forms a hydrogen bond with the ligand. The mutation of Ser-269 was found to differently affect the affinity of various ligands, indicating that this residue is involved in the selectivity of recognition of GABAB receptor ligands. Finally, the mutation of two residues, Ser-247 and Gln-312, was found to increase the affinity for agonists and to decrease the affinity for antagonists. Such an effect of point mutations can be explained by the Venus flytrap model for receptor activation. This model proposes that the initial step in the activation of the receptor by agonist results from the closure of the two lobes of the binding domain.     

Binding of Agonists and Antagonists to Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors on Intact Cultured Heart Cells

The binding of agonists and antagonists to muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on intact cultured cardiac cells has been compared with the binding observed in homogenized membrane preparations. The antagonists [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate and [3H]N-methylscopolamine bind to a single class of receptor sites on intact cells with affinities similar to those seen in membrane preparations. In contrast with the heterogeneity of agonist binding sites observed in membrane preparations, the agonist carbachol binds to a homogeneous class of low-affinity sites on intact cells with an affinity identical to that found for the low-affinity agonist site in membrane preparations in the presence of guanyl nucleotides. Kinetic studies of antagonist binding to receptors in the absence and presence of agonist did not provide evidence for the existence of a transient (greater than 30 s) high-affinity agonist site that was subsequently converted to a site of lower affinity. Nathanson N. M. Binding of agonists and antagonists to muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on intact cultured heart cells.     

Identification of an allosteric binding site for Zn2+ on the beta2 adrenergic receptor

The activity of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be modulated by a diverse spectrum of drugs ranging from full agonists to partial agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists. The vast majority of these ligands compete with native ligands for binding to orthosteric binding sites. Allosteric ligands have also been described for a number of GPCRs. However, little is known about the mechanism by which these ligands modulate the affinity of receptors for orthosteric ligands. We have previously reported that Zn(II) acts as a positive allosteric modulator of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR). To identify the Zn(2+) binding site responsible for the enhancement of agonist affinity in the beta(2)AR, we mutated histidines located in hydrophilic sequences bridging the seven transmembrane domains. Mutation of His-269 abolished the effect of Zn(2+) on agonist affinity. Mutations of other histidines had no effect on agonist affinity. Further mutagenesis of residues adjacent to His-269 demonstrated that Cys-265 and Glu-225 are also required to achieve the full allosteric effect of Zn(2+) on agonist binding. Our results suggest that bridging of the cytoplasmic extensions of TM5 and TM6 by Zn(2+) facilitates agonist binding. These results are in agreement with recent biophysical studies demonstrating that agonist binding leads to movement of TM6 relative to TM5.     

Resiniferatoxin binds to the capsaicin receptor (TRPV1) near the extracellular side of the S4 transmembrane domain

The capsaicin receptor (TRPV1) is a nonselective cation channel that is activated in nociceptors by several painful stimuli, and hence TRPV1 antagonists could represent a novel class of analgesic compounds. Resiniferatoxin (RTX), a potent agonist of TRPV1, and iodoresiniferatoxin (I-RTX), a potent antagonist of TRPV1, both bind with higher affinity to the rat TRPV1 (rTRPV1) than the human (hTRPV1) isoform. To identify the structural features responsible for this difference in affinity, [(3)H]RTX binding to chimeras between hTRPV1 and rTRPV1 was characterized. The "sensor" region within the transmembrane domain (S1-S4) was found to determine [(3)H]RTX binding affinity. All 16 different residues in this region were systematically substituted in hTRPV1 with rTRPV1 residues. A single mutation in the S4 membrane domain of hTRPV1, L547M, caused a 30-fold increase in [(3)H]RTX affinity whereas the inverse mutation in rTRPV1, M547L, caused a 30-fold decrease in affinity for [(3)H]RTX, and several other agonists and antagonists were similarly affected by these mutations. TRPV1 channels with mutations at position 547 were expressed in oocytes, and the relative response to RTX followed a pattern similar to that seen with [(3)H]RTX binding. These data suggest a model where Met-547 in the S4 domain of TRPV1 forms a binding pocket with Tyr-511 in the S3 domain. This model places RTX near the sensor domain thought to move during the gating process and should help to guide further work designed to understand the gating mechanisms of TRPV1 channels based on comparisons between the agonist RTX and the related competitive antagonist I-RTX.     

Determinants of antagonist binding at the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor subunit, GluR-D. Role of the conserved arginine 507 and glutamate 727 residues.

Previous structural and mutagenesis studies indicate that the invariant alpha-amino and alpha-carboxyl groups of glutamate receptor agonists are engaged in polar interactions with oppositely charged, conserved arginine and glutamate residues in the ligand-binding domain of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor. To examine the role of these residues (R507 and E727 in the GluR-D subunit) in the discrimination between agonists and antagonists, we analyzed the ligand-binding properties of homomeric GluR-D and its soluble ligand-binding domain with mutations at these positions. Filter-binding assays using [3H]AMPA, an agonist, and [3H]Ro 48-8587, a high-affinity antagonist, as radioligands revealed that even a conservative mutation at R507 (R507K) resulted in the complete loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. In contrast, a negative charge at position 727 was necessary for agonist binding, whereas the isosteric mutation, E727Q, abolished all agonist binding but retained high-affinity binding for [3H]Ro 48-8587, displaceable by 7,8-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione. Competition binding studies with antagonists representing different structural classes in combination with ligand docking experiments suggest that the role of E727 is antagonist-specific, ranging from no interaction to weak electrostatic interactions involving indirect and direct hydrogen bonding with the antagonist molecule. These results underline the importance of ion pair interaction with E727 for agonist activity and suggest that an interaction with R507, but not with E727, is essential for antagonist binding.     

Molecular basis for the species selectivity of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists CP-96,345 and RP67580.

Two non-peptide substance P antagonists exhibit opposite rank orders of potency for the human and rat neurokinin-1 receptors. CP-96,345 shows selectivity for the human receptor, whereas RP67580 shows selectivity for the rat receptor. Amino acid sequence comparison of the two receptors reveals 22 divergent residues. To elucidate the molecular basis for the species selectivity of these antagonists, divergent residues in the human neurokinin-1 receptor were substituted by the rat homologs. Analysis of mutant receptors revealed that substitution of 2 residues (V116L and I290S) in the transmembrane domain of the human neurokinin-1 receptor is both necessary and sufficient to reproduce the antagonist binding affinities of the rat receptor. The nature of these substitutions and the magnitude of the changes in binding affinity suggest that residues 116 and 290 do not interact directly with the antagonist molecules. The present results support a model in which phylogenetically conserved residues interact directly with the antagonists, while phylogenetically divergent residues affect the local helical packing of the receptor. Such a change in local structure would lead to increased binding affinity for one class of antagonists and decreased affinity for another.     

Characterization of a novel, non-peptidyl antagonist of the human glucagon receptor

We have identified a series of potent, orally bioavailable, non-peptidyl, triarylimidazole and triarylpyrrole glucagon receptor antagonists. 2-(4-Pyridyl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(5-bromo-2-propyloxyphenyl)p yrr ole (L-168,049), a prototypical member of this series, inhibits binding of labeled glucagon to the human glucagon receptor with an IC50 = 3. 7 +/- 3.4 nM (n = 7) but does not inhibit binding of labeled glucagon-like peptide to the highly homologous human glucagon-like peptide receptor at concentrations up to 10 microM. The binding affinity of L-168,049 for the human glucagon receptor is decreased 24-fold by the inclusion of divalent cations (5 mM). L-168,049 increases the apparent EC50 for glucagon stimulation of adenylyl cyclase in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the human glucagon receptor and decreases the maximal glucagon stimulation observed, with a Kb (concentration of antagonist that shifts the agonist dose-response 2-fold) of 25 nM. These data suggest that L-168,049 is a noncompetitive antagonist of glucagon action. Inclusion of L-168, 049 increases the rate of dissociation of labeled glucagon from the receptor 4-fold, confirming that the compound is a noncompetitive glucagon antagonist. In addition, we have identified two putative transmembrane domain residues, phenylalanine 184 in transmembrane domain 2 and tyrosine 239 in transmembrane domain 3, for which substitution by alanine reduces the affinity of L-168,049 46- and 4. 5-fold, respectively. These mutations do not alter the binding of labeled glucagon, suggesting that the binding sites for glucagon and L-168,049 are distinct.     

Homology modeling of the transmembrane domain of the human calcium sensing receptor and localization of an allosteric binding site

A homology model for the human calcium sensing receptor (hCaR) transmembrane domain utilizing bovine rhodopsin (bRho) structural information was derived and tested by docking the allosteric antagonist, NPS 2143, followed by mutagenesis of predicted contact sites. Mutation of residues Phe-668 (helix II), Arg-680, or Phe-684 (helix III) to Ala (or Val or Leu) and Glu-837 (helix VII) to Ile (or Gln) reduced the inhibitory effects of NPS 2143 on [Ca2+]i responses. The calcimimetic NPS R-568 increases the potency of Ca2+ in functional assays of CaR. Mutations at Phe-668, Phe-684, or Glu-837 attenuated the effects of this compound, but mutations at Arg-680 had no effect. In all cases, mutant CaRs responded normally to Ca2+ or phenylalanine, which act at distinct site(s). Discrimination by the Arg-680 mutant is consistent with the structural differences between NPS 2143, which contains an alkyl bridge hydroxyl group, and NPS R-568, which does not. The homology model of the CaR transmembrane domain robustly accounts for binding of both an allosteric antagonist and agonist, which share a common site, and provides a basis for the development of more specific and/or potent allosteric modulators of CaR. These studies suggest that the bRho backbone can be used as a starting point for homology modeling of even distantly related G protein-coupled receptors and provide a rational framework for investigation of the contributions of the transmembrane domain to CaR function.     

Agonist-specific, high-affinity binding epitopes are contributed by an arginine in the N-terminus of the human oxytocin receptor

The effects of the peptide hormone oxytocin (OT) are mediated by the oxytocin receptor, which is a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. Defining differences between the binding of agonists and antagonists to the OTR, at the molecular level, is of fundamental importance to understanding OTR activation and to rational drug design. Previous reports have indicated that the N-terminus of the OTR is required for OT binding. The aim of this study was to identify which individual residues within the N-terminal domain of the human OTR provided these OT binding epitopes. A series of truncated OTRs and mutant receptor constructs with systematic alanine substitution were characterized with respect to their pharmacological profile and intracellular signaling capability. Although a number of residues within the OTR will be required for optimal OT-OTR interaction, our data establish that Arg(34) within the N-terminal domain contributes to high-affinity OT binding. Removal of Arg(34) by truncation or substitution resulted in a 2000-fold decrease in OT affinity. In addition, we show that the arginyl at this locus is required for high-affinity binding of agonists in general. However, the importance of Arg(34) is restricted to agonist interaction with the OTR, as it was not required for binding peptide antagonist or non-peptide antagonist. It is noteworthy that the corresponding Arg in the related rat V(1a) vasopressin receptor is also required for high-affinity agonist binding. This study defines, at the molecular level, the role of the N-terminus of the OTR in high-affinity agonist binding and identifies a key residue for this function.     

Role of Conserved Serine Residues in the Interaction of Agonists with D3 Dopamine Receptors

To understand the role of conserved serine residues in the fifth transmembrane domain (Ser192, Ser193, and Ser196) of the D3 dopamine receptor, these have been mutated individually to alanine, and the ligand binding properties of the mutant receptors have been evaluated. The mutations had little or no effect on the binding of the antagonist spiperone and the agonist quinpirole, indicating that the overall conformation of the receptor was unaffected. The binding of dopamine and 7-hydroxydipropylaminotetralin, agonists containing hydroxyl groups, was, however, of lower affinity for the Ser192 mutation but unaffected by the other mutations (Ser193 and Ser196). Therefore, for the agonists tested, the hydroxyl groups interact exclusively with Ser192.     

Discrimination between agonists and antagonists by the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid-selective glutamate receptor. A mutation analysis of the ligand-binding domain of GluR-D subunit

The crystal structures of the ligand-binding core of the agonist complexes of the glutamate receptor-B (GluR-B) subunit of the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA)-selective glutamate receptor indicate that the distal anionic group of agonist molecules are stabilized by interactions with an N-terminal region of an alpha-helix (helix F) in the lobe 2 ("domain 2," Armstrong, N., and Gouaux, E. (2000) Neuron 28, 165-181) of the two-lobed ligand-binding domain. We used site-directed mutagenesis to further analyze the role of this region in the recognition of both agonists and antagonists by the AMPA receptor. Wild-type and mutated versions of the ligand-binding domain of GluR-D were expressed in insect cells as secreted soluble polypeptides and subjected to binding assays using [(3)H]AMPA, an agonist, and [(3)H]Ro 48-8587 (9-imidazol-1-yl-8-nitro-2,3,5,6-tetrahydro[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c] quinazoline-2,5-dione), a high affinity AMPA receptor antagonist, as radioligands. Single alanine substitutions at residues Leu-672 and Thr-677 severely affected the affinities for all agonists, as seen in ligand competition assays, whereas similar mutations at residues Asp-673, Ser-674, Gly-675, Ser-676, and Lys-678 selectively affected the binding affinities of one or two of the agonists. In striking contrast, the binding affinities of [(3)H]Ro 48-8587 and of another competitive antagonist, 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, were not affected by any of these alanine mutations, suggesting the absence of critical side-chain interactions. Together with ligand docking experiments, our results indicate a selective engagement of the side chains of the helix F region in agonist binding, and suggest that conformational changes involving this region may play a critical role in receptor activation.