Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

Stomatal Blue Light Response Is Present in Early Vascular Plants

Light is a major environmental factor required for stomatal opening. Blue light (BL) induces stomatal opening in higher plants as a signal under the photosynthetic active radiation. The stomatal BL response is not present in the fern species of Polypodiopsida. The acquisition of a stomatal BL response might provide competitive advantages in both the uptake of CO₂ and prevention of water loss with the ability to rapidly open and close stomata. We surveyed the stomatal opening in response to strong red light (RL) and weak BL under the RL with gas exchange technique in a diverse selection of plant species from euphyllophytes, including spermatophytes and monilophytes, to lycophytes. We showed the presence of RL-induced stomatal opening in most of these species and found that the BL responses operated in all euphyllophytes except Polypodiopsida. We also confirmed that the stomatal opening in lycophytes, the early vascular plants, is driven by plasma membrane proton-translocating adenosine triphosphatase and K⁺ accumulation in guard cells, which is the same mechanism operating in stomata of angiosperms. These results suggest that the early vascular plants respond to both RL and BL and actively regulate stomatal aperture. We also found three plant species that absolutely require BL for both stomatal opening and photosynthetic CO₂ fixation, including a gymnosperm, C. revoluta, and the ferns Equisetum hyemale and Psilotum nudum.Stomata regulate gas exchange between plants and the atmosphere (Zeiger, 1983; Assmann, 1993; Roelfsema and Hedrich, 2005; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010). Acquisition of stomata was a key step in the evolution of terrestrial plants by allowing uptake of CO₂ from the atmosphere and accelerating the provision of nutrients via the transpiration stream within the plant (Hetherington and Woodward, 2003; McAdam and Brodribb, 2013). Stomatal aperture is regulated by changes in the turgor of guard cells, which are induced by environmental factors and endogenous phytohormones. Light is a major factor in the promotion of stomatal opening, and the opening is mediated via two distinct light-regulated pathways that are known as photosynthesis- and blue light (BL)-dependent responses under photosynthetic active radiation (PAR; Vavasseur and Raghavendra, 2005; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Lawson et al., 2014).The photosynthesis-dependent stomatal opening is induced by a continuous high intensity of light, and the action spectrum for the stomatal opening resembles that of photosynthetic pigments in leaves (Willmer and Fricker, 1996). Both mesophyll and guard cells possess photosynthetically active chloroplasts, and their photosynthesis has been suggested to contribute to stomatal opening in leaves. The decrease in the concentration of intercellular CO₂ (Ci) caused by photosynthetic CO₂ fixation or some unidentified mediators and metabolites from mesophyll cells is supposed to elicit stomatal opening, although the exact nature of the events is unclear (Wong et al., 1979; Vavasseur and Raghavendra, 2005; Roelfsema et al., 2006; Mott et al., 2008; Lawson et al., 2014).BL-dependent stomatal opening requires a strong intensity of PAR as a background: weak BL solely scarcely elicits stomatal opening, but the same intensity of BL induces the fast and large stomatal opening in the presence of strong red light (RL; Ogawa et al., 1978; Shimazaki et al., 2007). Since such stomatal opening requires BL under the RL or PAR, we call the opening reaction a BL-dependent response of stomata. BL-dependent stomatal response takes place and proceeds in natural environments because the sunlight contains both BL and RL and facilitates photosynthetic CO₂ fixation (Assmann, 1988; Takemiya et al., 2013a). In this stomatal response, BL and PAR (BL, RL, and other wavelengths of light) seem to act as a signal and an energy source, respectively.The BL-dependent stomatal opening is initiated by the absorption of BL by phototropin1 and phototropin2 (Kinoshita et al., 2001), the plant-specific BL receptors, in guard cells followed by activation of the plasma membrane proton-translocating adenosine triphosphatase (H+-ATPase; Kinoshita and Shimazaki, 1999). Two newly identified proteins, protein phosphatase1 and blue light signaling1 (BLUS1), mediate the signaling between phototropins and H+-ATPase (Takemiya et al., 2006, 2013a, 2013b). The activated H+-ATPase evokes a plasma membrane hyperpolarization, which drives K⁺ uptake through the voltage-gated, inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (Assmann, 1993; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010; Kollist et al., 2014). The accumulation of K⁺ causes water uptake and increases turgor pressure of guard cells, and finally results in stomatal opening. The BL-dependent opening is enhanced by RL, and BL at low intensity is effective in the presence of RL (Ogawa et al., 1978; Iino et al., 1985; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Suetsugu et al., 2014). These stomatal responses by RL and BL are commonly observed in a number of seed plants so far examined.Fine control of stomatal aperture to various environmental factors has been characterized in many angiosperms. Although morphological and mechanical diversity of stomata is widely documented, little is known about the functional diversity (Willmer and Fricker, 1996; Hetherington and Woodward, 2003). Our previous study indicated that BL-dependent stomatal response is absent in the major fern species of Polypodiopsida, including Adiantum capillus-veneris, Pteris cretica, Asplenium scolopendrium, and Nephrolepis auriculata, but the stomata of these species open by PAR including RL (Doi et al., 2006). When the epidermal peels isolated from A. capillus-veneris are treated with photosynthetic electron transport inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1dimethylurea (Doi and Shimazaki, 2008), the response is completely inhibited, but the responses in the seed plants of Vicia faba and Commelina communis are relatively insensitive to 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1dimethylurea (Schwartz and Zeiger, 1984). These findings suggest that there is functional diversity in light-dependent stomatal response in different lineages of land plants. In accord with this notion, the different sensitivities of stomatal response to abscisic acid and CO₂ have been reported among the plant species of angiosperm, gymnosperm, ferns, and lycophytes (Mansfield and Willmer, 1969; Brodribb and McAdam, 2011), although the exact responsiveness to abscisic acid and CO₂ is still debated (Chater et al., 2011, 2013; Ruszala et al., 2011; McAdam and Brodribb, 2013).To address the origin and distribution of stomatal light responses, we investigated the presence of a stomatal response using a gas exchange method and various lineages of vascular plants, including euphyllophytes and lycophytes. Unexpectedly, all plant lineages except Polypodiopsida in monilophytes exhibited a stomatal response to BL in the presence of RL, suggesting that the response was present in the early evolutionary stage of vascular plants. We also report the stomatal opening in response to RL in these plant species.     

The Role of a Potassium Transporter OsHAK5 in Potassium Acquisition and Transport from Roots to Shoots in Rice at Low Potassium Supply Levels

In plants, K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) is the largest potassium (K) transporter family; however, few of the members have had their physiological functions characterized in planta. Here, we studied OsHAK5 of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice (Oryza sativa). We determined its cellular and tissue localization and analyzed its functions in rice using both OsHAK5 knockout mutants and overexpression lines in three genetic backgrounds. A β-glucuronidase reporter driven by the OsHAK5 native promoter indicated OsHAK5 expression in various tissue organs from root to seed, abundantly in root epidermis and stele, the vascular tissues, and mesophyll cells. Net K influx rate in roots and K transport from roots to aerial parts were severely impaired by OsHAK5 knockout but increased by OsHAK5 overexpression in 0.1 and 0.3 mm K external solution. The contribution of OsHAK5 to K mobilization within the rice plant was confirmed further by the change of K concentration in the xylem sap and K distribution in the transgenic lines when K was removed completely from the external solution. Overexpression of OsHAK5 increased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots and salt stress tolerance (shoot growth), while knockout of OsHAK5 decreased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots, resulting in sensitivity to salt stress. Taken together, these results demonstrate that OsHAK5 plays a major role in K acquisition by roots faced with low external K and in K upward transport from roots to shoots in K-deficient rice plants.Potassium (K) is one of the three most important macronutrients and the most abundant cation in plants. As a major osmoticum in the vacuole, K drives the generation of turgor pressure, enabling cell expansion. In the vascular tissue, K is an important participant in the generation of root pressure (for review, see Wegner, 2014 [including his new hypothesis]). In the phloem, K is critical for the transport of photoassimilates from source to sink (Marschner, 1996; Deeken et al., 2002; Gajdanowicz et al., 2011). In addition, enhancing K absorption and decreasing sodium (Na) accumulation is a major strategy of glycophytes in salt stress tolerance (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999; Munns and Tester, 2008; Shabala and Cuin, 2008).Plants acquire K through K-permeable proteins at the root surface. Since available K concentration in the soil may vary by 100-fold, plants have developed multiple K uptake systems for adapting to this variability (Epstein et al., 1963; Grabov, 2007; Maathuis, 2009). In a classic K uptake experiment in barley (Hordeum vulgare), root K absorption has been described as a high-affinity and low-affinity biphasic transport process (Epstein et al., 1963). It is generally assumed that the low-affinity transport system (LATS) in the roots mediates K uptake in the millimolar range and that the activity of this system is insensitive to external K concentration (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997; Chérel et al., 2014). In contrast, the high-affinity transport system (HATS) was rapidly up-regulated when the supply of exogenous K was halted (Glass, 1976; Glass and Dunlop, 1978).The membrane transporters for K flux identified in plants are generally classified into three channels and three transporter families based on phylogenetic analysis (Mäser et al., 2001; Véry and Sentenac, 2003; Lebaudy et al., 2007; Alemán et al., 2011). For K uptake, it was predicted that, under most circumstances, K transporters function as HATS, while K-permeable channels mediate LATS (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997). However, a root-expressed K channel in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), Arabidopsis K Transporter1 (AKT1), mediates K absorption over a wide range of external K concentrations (Sentenac et al., 1992; Lagarde et al., 1996; Hirsch et al., 1998; Spalding et al., 1999), while evidence is accumulating that many K transporters, including members of the K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) family, are low-affinity K transporters (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Senn et al., 2001), implying that functions of plant K channels and transporters overlap at different K concentration ranges.Out of the three families of K transporters, cation proton antiporter (CPA), high affinity K/Na transporter (HKT), and KT/HAK/KUP, CPA was characterized as a K⁺(Na⁺)/H⁺ antiporter, HKT may cotransport Na and K or transport Na only (Rubio et al., 1995; Uozumi et al., 2000), while KT/HAK/KUP were predicted to be H⁺-coupled K⁺ symporters (Mäser et al., 2001; Lebaudy et al., 2007). KT/HAK/KUP were named by different researchers who first identified and cloned them (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Santa-María et al., 1997). In plants, the KT/HAK/KUP family is the largest K transporter family, including 13 members in Arabidopsis and 27 members in the rice (Oryza sativa) genome (Rubio et al., 2000; Mäser et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2008). Sequence alignments show that genes of this family share relatively low homology to each other. The KT/HAK/KUP family was divided into four major clusters (Rubio et al., 2000; Gupta et al., 2008), and in cluster I and II, they were further separated into A and B groups. Genes of cluster I or II likely exist in all plants, cluster III is composed of genes from both Arabidopsis and rice, while cluster IV includes only four rice genes (Grabov, 2007; Gupta et al., 2008).The functions of KT/HAK/KUP were studied mostly in heterologous expression systems. Transporters of cluster I, such as AtHAK5, HvHAK1, OsHAK1, and OsHAK5, are localized in the plasma membrane (Kim et al., 1998; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gierth et al., 2005) and exhibit high-affinity K uptake in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Santa-María et al., 1997; Fu and Luan, 1998; Rubio et al., 2000) and in Escherichia coli (Horie et al., 2011). Transporters of cluster II, like AtKUP4 (TINY ROOT HAIRS1, TRH1), HvHAK2, OsHAK2, OsHAK7, and OsHAK10, could not complement the K uptake-deficient yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) but were able to mediate K fluxes in a bacterial mutant; they might be tonoplast transporters (Senn et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Rodríguez-Navarro and Rubio, 2006). The function of transporters in clusters III and IV is even less known (Grabov, 2007).Existing data suggest that some KT/HAK/KUP transporters also may respond to salinity stress (Maathuis, 2009). The cluster I transporters of HvHAK1 mediate Na influx (Santa-María et al., 1997), while AtHAK5 expression is inhibited by Na (Rubio et al., 2000; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2010). Expression of OsHAK5 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY2 cells enhanced the salt tolerance of these cells by accumulating more K without affecting their Na content (Horie et al., 2011).There are only scarce reports on the physiological function of KT/HAK/KUP in planta. In Arabidopsis, mutation of AtKUP2 (SHORT HYPOCOTYL3) resulted in a short hypocotyl, small leaves, and a short flowering stem (Elumalai et al., 2002), while a loss-of-function mutation of AtKUP4 (TRH1) resulted in short root hairs and a loss of gravity response in the root (Rigas et al., 2001; Desbrosses et al., 2003; Ahn et al., 2004). AtHAK5 is the only system currently known to mediate K uptake at concentrations below 0.01 mm (Rubio et al., 2010) and provides a cesium uptake pathway (Qi et al., 2008). AtHAK5 and AtAKT1 are the two major physiologically relevant molecular entities mediating K uptake into roots in the range between 0.01 and 0.05 mm (Pyo et al., 2010; Rubio et al., 2010). AtAKT1 may contribute to K uptake within the K concentrations that belong to the high-affinity system described by Epstein et al. (1963).Among all 27 members of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice, OsHAK1, OsHAK5, OsHAK19, and OsHAK20 were grouped in cluster IB (Gupta et al., 2008). These four rice HAK members share 50.9% to 53.4% amino acid identity with AtHAK5. OsHAK1 was expressed in the whole plant, with maximum expression in roots, and was up-regulated by K deficiency; it mediated high-affinity K uptake in yeast (Bañuelos et al., 2002). In this study, we examined the tissue-specific localization and the physiological functions of OsHAK5 in response to variation in K supply and to salt stress in rice. By comparing K uptake and translocation in OsHAK5 knockout (KO) mutants and in OsHAK5-overexpressing lines with those in their respective wild-type lines supplied with different K concentrations, we found that OsHAK5 not only mediates high-affinity K acquisition but also participates in root-to-shoot K transport as well as in K-regulated salt tolerance.     

The Arabidopsis Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport III Regulates Internal Vesicle Formation of the Prevacuolar Compartment and Is Required for Plant Development

We have established an efficient transient expression system with several vacuolar reporters to study the roles of endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT)-III subunits in regulating the formation of intraluminal vesicles of prevacuolar compartments (PVCs)/multivesicular bodies (MVBs) in plant cells. By measuring the distributions of reporters on/within the membrane of PVC/MVB or tonoplast, we have identified dominant negative mutants of ESCRT-III subunits that affect membrane protein degradation from both secretory and endocytic pathways. In addition, induced expression of these mutants resulted in reduction in luminal vesicles of PVC/MVB, along with increased detection of membrane-attaching vesicles inside the PVC/MVB. Transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants with induced expression of ESCRT-III dominant negative mutants also displayed severe cotyledon developmental defects with reduced cell size, loss of the central vacuole, and abnormal chloroplast development in mesophyll cells, pointing out an essential role of the ESCRT-III complex in postembryonic development in plants. Finally, membrane dissociation of ESCRT-III components is important for their biological functions and is regulated by direct interaction among Vacuolar Protein Sorting-Associated Protein20-1 (VPS20.1), Sucrose Nonfermenting7-1, VPS2.1, and the adenosine triphosphatase VPS4/SUPPRESSOR OF K⁺ TRANSPORT GROWTH DEFECT1.Endomembrane trafficking in plant cells is complicated such that secretory, endocytic, and recycling pathways are usually integrated with each other at the post-Golgi compartments, among which, the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and prevacuolar compartment (PVC)/multivesicular body (MVB) are best studied (Tse et al., 2004; Lam et al., 2007a, 2007b; Müller et al., 2007; Foresti and Denecke, 2008; Hwang, 2008; Otegui and Spitzer, 2008; Robinson et al., 2008; Richter et al., 2009; Ding et al., 2012; Gao et al., 2014). Following the endocytic trafficking of a lipophilic dye, FM4-64, the TGN and PVC/MVB are sequentially labeled and thus are defined as the early and late endosome, respectively, in plant cells (Lam et al., 2007a; Chow et al., 2008). While the TGN is a tubular vesicular-like structure that may include several different microdomains and fit its biological function as a sorting station (Chow et al., 2008; Kang et al., 2011), the PVC/MVB is 200 to 500 nm in size with multiple luminal vesicles of approximately 40 nm (Tse et al., 2004). Membrane cargoes destined for degradation are sequestered into these tiny luminal vesicles and delivered to the lumen of the lytic vacuole (LV) via direct fusion between the PVC/MVB and the LV (Spitzer et al., 2009; Viotti et al., 2010; Cai et al., 2012). Therefore, the PVC/MVB functions between the TGN and LV as an intermediate organelle and decides the fate of membrane cargoes in the LV.In yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), carboxypeptidase S (CPS) is synthesized as a type II integral membrane protein and sorted from the Golgi to the lumen of the vacuole (Spormann et al., 1992). Genetic analyses on the trafficking of CPS have led to the identification of approximately 17 class E genes (Piper et al., 1995; Babst et al., 1997, 2002a, 2002b; Odorizzi et al., 1998; Katzmann et al., 2001) that constitute the core endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery. The evolutionarily conserved ESCRT complex consists of several functionally different subcomplexes, ESCRT-0, ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II, and ESCRT-III and the ESCRT-III-associated/Vacuolar Protein Sorting4 (VPS4) complex. Together, they form a complex protein-protein interaction network that coordinates sorting of cargoes and inward budding of the membrane on the MVB (Hurley and Hanson, 2010; Henne et al., 2011). Cargo proteins carrying ubiquitin signals are thought to be passed from one ESCRT subcomplex to the next, starting with their recognition by ESCRT-0 (Bilodeau et al., 2002, 2003; Hislop and von Zastrow, 2011; Le Bras et al., 2011; Shields and Piper, 2011; Urbé, 2011). ESCRT-0 recruits the ESCRT-I complex, a heterotetramer of VPS23, VPS28, VPS37, and MVB12, from the cytosol to the endosomal membrane (Katzmann et al., 2001, 2003). The C terminus of VPS28 interacts with the N terminus of VPS36, a member of the ESCRT-II complex (Kostelansky et al., 2006; Teo et al., 2006). Then, cargoes passed from ESCRT-I and ESCRT-II are concentrated in certain membrane domains of the endosome by ESCRT-III, which includes four coiled-coil proteins and is sufficient to induce the membrane invagination (Babst et al., 2002b; Saksena et al., 2009; Wollert et al., 2009). Finally, the ESCRT components are disassociated from the membrane by the adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA) VPS4/SUPPRESSOR OF K+ TRANSPORT GROWTH DEFECT1 (SKD1) before releasing the internal vesicles (Babst et al., 1997, 1998).Putative homologs of ESCRT-I–ESCRT-III and ESCRT-III-associated components have been identified in plants, except for ESCRT-0, which is only present in Opisthokonta (Winter and Hauser, 2006; Leung et al., 2008; Schellmann and Pimpl, 2009). To date, only a few plant ESCRT components have been studied in detail. The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) AAA ATPase SKD1 localized to the PVC/MVB and showed ATPase activity that was regulated by Lysosomal Trafficking Regulator-Interacting Protein5, a plant homolog of Vps Twenty Associated1 Protein (Haas et al., 2007). Expression of the dominant negative form of SKD1 caused an increase in the size of the MVB and a reduction in the number of internal vesicles (Haas et al., 2007). This protein also contributes to the maintenance of the central vacuole and might be associated with cell cycle regulation, as leaf trichomes expressing its dominant negative mutant form lost the central vacuole and frequently contained multiple nuclei (Shahriari et al., 2010). Double null mutants of CHARGED MULTIVESICULAR BODY PROTEIN, chmp1achmp1b, displayed severe growth defects and were seedling lethal. This may be due to the mislocalization of plasma membrane (PM) proteins, including those involved in auxin transport such as PINFORMED1, PINFORMED2, and AUXIN-RESISTANT1, from the vacuolar degradation pathway to the tonoplast of the LV (Spitzer et al., 2009).Plant ESCRT components usually contain several homologs, with the possibility of functional redundancy. Single mutants of individual ESCRT components may not result in an obvious phenotype, whereas knockout of all homologs of an ESCRT component by generating double or triple mutants may be lethal to the plant. As a first step to carry out systematic analysis on each ESCRT complex in plant cells, here, we established an efficient analysis system to monitor the localization changes of four vacuolar reporters that accumulate either in the lumen (LRR84A-GFP, EMP12-GFP, and aleurain-GFP) or on the tonoplast (GFP-VIT1) of the LV and identified several ESCRT-III dominant negative mutants. We reported that ESCRT-III subunits were involved in the release of PVC/MVB’s internal vesicles from the limiting membrane and were required for membrane protein degradation from secretory and endocytic pathways. In addition, transgenic Arabidopsis plants with induced expression of ESCRT-III dominant negative mutants showed severe cotyledon developmental defects. We also showed that membrane dissociation of ESCRT-III subunits was regulated by direct interaction with SKD1.     

Phycobilisome Mobility and Its Role in the Regulation of Light Harvesting in Red Algae

Red algae represent an evolutionarily important group that gave rise to the whole red clade of photosynthetic organisms. They contain a unique combination of light-harvesting systems represented by a membrane-bound antenna and by phycobilisomes situated on thylakoid membrane surfaces. So far, very little has been revealed about the mobility of their phycobilisomes and the regulation of their light-harvesting system in general. Therefore, we carried out a detailed analysis of phycobilisome dynamics in several red alga strains and compared these results with the presence (or absence) of photoprotective mechanisms. Our data conclusively prove phycobilisome mobility in two model mesophilic red alga strains, Porphyridium cruentum and Rhodella violacea. In contrast, there was almost no phycobilisome mobility in the thermophilic red alga Cyanidium caldarium that was not caused by a decrease in lipid desaturation in this extremophile. Experimental data attributed this immobility to the strong phycobilisome-photosystem interaction that highly restricted phycobilisome movement. Variations in phycobilisome mobility reflect the different ways in which light-harvesting antennae can be regulated in mesophilic and thermophilic red algae. Fluorescence changes attributed in cyanobacteria to state transitions were observed only in mesophilic P. cruentum with mobile phycobilisomes, and they were absent in the extremophilic C. caldarium with immobile phycobilisomes. We suggest that state transitions have an important regulatory function in mesophilic red algae; however, in thermophilic red algae, this process is replaced by nonphotochemical quenching.Photosynthetic light reactions are mediated by pigment-binding protein complexes located either inside the thylakoid membrane (e.g. chlorophyll-binding proteins of both photosystems) or associated on the membrane surface (e.g. phycobilisomes [PBsomes] in cyanobacteria and red algae). Recent progress in structural biology has allowed the construction of high-resolution structural models of most photosynthetic protein complexes (for review, see Fromme, 2008) together with their large-scale organization into supercomplexes (for review, see Dekker and Boekema, 2005). However, the dynamics of these supercomplexes and the mobility of particular light-harvesting proteins in vivo are still poorly understood (for review, see Mullineaux, 2008a; Kaňa, 2013; Kirchhoff, 2014) The importance of protein mobility in various photosynthetic processes, like nonphotochemical quenching and state transitions, has been explored mostly based on indirect in vitro experiments, including single-particle analysis (Kouřil et al., 2005), or by biochemical methods (Betterle et al., 2009; Caffarri et al., 2009). Recent studies on the mobility of light-harvesting proteins using live-cell imaging (for review, see Mullineaux, 2008a; Kaňa, 2013) have elucidated the importance of protein mobility for photosynthetic function (Joshua and Mullineaux, 2004; Joshua et al., 2005; Goral et al., 2010, 2012; Johnson et al., 2011). In addition, the redistribution of respiratory complexes in cyanobacterial thylakoid membranes plays an essential role in controlling electron flow (Liu et al., 2012).It is generally accepted that the mobility of most of the transmembrane photosynthetic proteins is very restricted in the thylakoid. The typical effective diffusion coefficient of photosynthetic proteins is somewhere between 0.01 and 0.001 μm⁻² s⁻¹ (Kaňa, 2013). A similar restriction in membrane protein mobility has also been described for bacterial membranes (Dix and Verkman, 2008; Mika and Poolman, 2011). In fact, this is very different in comparison with what we know for other eukaryotic membranes (e.g. plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum), where membrane-protein diffusion can be faster by 1 or 2 orders of magnitude (Lippincott-Schwartz et al., 2001). Therefore, macromolecular crowding of proteins has been used to rationalize the restricted protein mobility in thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts (Kirchhoff, 2008a, 2008b). Indeed, atomic force microscopy studies have shown that there is a dense packing and interaction of complexes in the photosynthetic membranes (Liu et al., 2011). Therefore, the diffusion of photosynthetic proteins in the thylakoid membrane is rather slow, and it increases only in less crowded parts of thylakoids (Kirchhoff et al., 2013). The current model of photosynthetic protein mobility thus proposes the immobility of protein supercomplexes, such as PSII (Mullineaux et al., 1997; Kirchhoff, 2008b), with only a small mobile fraction of chlorophyll-binding proteins represented by external antennae of photosystems, including light harvesting complex of PSII in higher plants (Consoli et al., 2005; Kirchhoff et al., 2008) or iron stress-induced chlorophyll-binding protein A in cyanobacteria (Sarcina and Mullineaux, 2004).The restricted mobility of internal membrane supercomplexes (photosystems) contrasts with the relatively mobile PBsomes (Mullineaux et al., 1997; Sarcina et al., 2001). PBsomes are sizeable biliprotein supercomplexes (5–10 MD) attached to the thylakoid membrane surface with dimensions of approximately 64 × 42 × 28 nm (length × width × height; Arteni et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2008a). PBsomes are composed of chromophore-bearing phycobiliproteins and colorless linker polypeptides (Adir, 2005; Liu et al., 2005). They serve as the main light-harvesting antennae in various species, including cyanobacteria, red algae, glaucocystophytes, and cryptophytes. Although a single PBsome is composed of hundreds of biliproteins, absorbed light energy is efficiently transferred toward a specific biliprotein that functions as a terminal energy emitter (Glazer, 1989). From there, energy can be transferred to either PSI or PSII and used in photosynthesis (Mullineaux et al., 1990; Mullineaux, 1992, 1994). In typical prokaryotic cyanobacteria and eukaryotic red algae, PBsomes are composed of two main parts: (1) allophycocyanin (APC) core proteins adjacent to the thylakoid membrane; and (2) peripheral rod proteins made from phycocyanin only or from a combination of phycocyanin together with phycoerythrin. Such complex and modular composition allows for different spectroscopic properties of PBsomes and thus their complementary absorption in the spectral region that is not covered by chlorophyll-binding proteins.PBsome mobility has been studied only in a few types of cyanobacteria (for review, see Kaňa, 2013). PBsomes have been recognized as a mobile element with an effective diffusion coefficient of about 0.03 μm² s⁻¹ for Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 (Mullineaux et al., 1997; Sarcina et al., 2001). The effective diffusion coefficient value depends on lipid composition, temperature, and the size of the PBsome (Sarcina et al., 2001). The diffusion coefficient reflects PBsome mobility, but it is not affected singularly by physical diffusion processes, and the role of PBsome-photosystem interaction is an open question (Kaňa, 2013). PBsome mobility seems to be related to the requirement of light-induced PBsome redistribution during state transitions (Joshua and Mullineaux, 2004). The mechanism of state transitions in cyanobacteria is still rather questionable (for review, see Kirilovsky et al., 2014). As PSII seems to be immobile, it has been suggested that PBsomes interact with photosystems only transiently and that physical redistribution (diffusion) of PBsomes is crucial for the state transition (Mullineaux et al., 1997). The importance of such long-distance diffusions, however, should be tested experimentally in more detail (Kaňa, 2013), as an alternative theory of the state transition proposed only slight PBsome movement (shifting) between photosystems (McConnell et al., 2002). However, in both cases, PBsome mobility (i.e. the PBsome’s ability to move) is required (Kaňa, 2013).Red algae are the eukaryotic representatives of phototrophs containing PBsomes (Su et al., 2010). They represent the ancestor of photosynthetic microorganisms from the red clade of photosynthesis (Yoon et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2013), which includes various model organisms such as diatoms, chromerids, or dinoflagellates. Red algae contain a unique combination of antennae systems on their membrane surfaces, which are formed mostly by hemispherical PBsomes (Mimuro and Kikuchi, 2003; Arteni et al., 2008). Red algae also contain transmembrane light-harvesting antennae (Vanselow et al., 2009; Neilson and Durnford, 2010; Green, 2011) associated mostly with PSI (Wolfe et al., 1994). Therefore, red algae represent a functionally important eukaryotic model organism; however, few facts are known about the regulation of its light-harvesting efficiency, although it seems to be connected with photoprotection in the reaction center (Delphin et al., 1996, 1998; Krupnik et al., 2013). The presence of photoprotective NPQ in PBsomes of prokaryotic cyanobacteria has been conclusively proven (Kirilovsky et al., 2014); however, this mechanism seems to be missing in eukaryotic phycobiliproteins of cryptophytes (Kaňa et al., 2012b) and red algae. Moreover, the presence (or absence) of PBsome mobility has not been confirmed conclusively (Liu et al., 2009).Therefore, we carried out a detailed study of PBsome mobility in red algal chloroplasts to determine the role of mobility in the regulation of light-harvesting efficiency. We found that red alga PBsomes are a mobile protein complex with effective diffusion coefficient between 2.7 × 10⁻³ and 13 × 10⁻³ μm⁻² s⁻¹ in all studied mesophilic strains. It contrasted with PBsomes in extremophilic red algal strains (Cyanidium caldarium), where PBsome mobility under physiological conditions was highly restricted (effective diffusion coefficient of approximately 0.6 × 10⁻³ μm⁻² s⁻¹). The restriction of PBsome mobility in extremophilic C. caldarium was due to a tight interaction of PBsomes with both photosystems and not to changes in lipid desaturation, an effect typical for extremophiles. The PBsome-photosystem interaction was weakened for C. caldarium grown at suboptimal temperatures, resulting in a pronounced increase in PBsome mobility thanks to PBsome decoupling from the photosystem. This result shows that PBsome mobility in this strain is limited by the strength of the PBsome-photosystem interaction rather than by the restriction of diffusion by factors such as macromolecular crowding. Moreover, our study allows us to describe two different models of light-harvesting antenna regulation in red algae. In mesophilic strains (Porphyridium cruentum and Rhodella violacea), absorbed light is redistributed between photosystems in a process of state transition that requires PBsome mobility. On the contrary, in extremophilic C. caldarium, PBsome are strongly coupled to photosystems and excess light is dissipated by a process of nonphotochemical quenching, as has been described recently (Krupnik et al., 2013).