Robo4 signaling in endothelial cells implies attraction guidance mechanisms

Roundabouts (robo) are cell-surface receptors that mediate repulsive signaling mechanisms at the central nervous system midline. However, robos may also mediate attraction mechanisms in the context of vascular development. Here, we have performed structure-function analysis of roundabout4 (Robo4), the predominant robo expressed in embryonic zebrafish vasculature and found by gain of function approaches in vitro that Robo4 activates Cdc42 and Rac1 Rho GTPases in endothelial cells. Indeed, complementary robo4 gene knockdown approaches in zebrafish embryos show lower amounts of active Cdc42 and Rac1 and angioblasts isolated from these knockdown embryos search actively for directionality and guidance cues. Furthermore, Robo4-expressing endothelial cells show morphology and phenotype, characteristic of Rho GTPase activation. Taken together, this study suggests that Robo4 mediates attraction-signaling mechanisms through Rho GTPases in vertebrate vascular guidance.     

Distinct roles for Robo2 in the regulation of axon and dendrite growth by retinal ganglion cells

Guidance factors act on the tip of a growing axon to direct it to its target. What role these molecules play, however, in the control of the dendrites that extend from that axon’s cell body is poorly understood. Slits, through their Robo receptors, guide many types of axons, including those of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Here we assess and contrast the role of Slit/Robo signalling in the growth and guidance of the axon and dendrites extended by RGCs in Xenopus laevis. As Xenopus RGCs extend dendrites, they express robo2 and robo3, while slit1 and slit2 are expressed in RGCs and in the adjacent inner nuclear layer. Interestingly, our functional data with antisense knockdown and dominant negative forms of Robo2 (dnRobo2) and Robo3 (dnRobo3) indicate that Slit/Robo signalling has no role in RGC dendrite guidance, and instead is necessary to stimulate dendrite branching, primarily via Robo2. Our in vitro culture data argue that Slits are the ligands involved. In contrast, both dnRobo2 and dnRobo3 inhibited the extension of axons and caused the misrouting of some axons. Based on these data, we propose that Robo signalling can have distinct functions in the axon and dendrites of the same cell, and that the specific combinations of Robo receptors could underlie these differences. Slit acts via Robo2 in dendrites as a branching/growth factor but not in guidance, while Robo2 and Robo3 function in concert in axons to mediate axonal interactions and respond to Slits as guidance factors. These data underscore the likelihood that a limited number of extrinsic factors regulate the distinct morphologies of axons and dendrites.     

Human placental multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells modulate placenta angiogenesis through Slit2-Robo signaling

abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate whether human placental multipotent mesenchymal stromal cell (hPMSC)-derived Slit2 and endothelial cell Roundabout (Robo) receptors are involved in placental angiogenesis. The hPMSC-conditioned medium and human umbilical vein endothelial cells were studied for Slit2 and Robo receptor expression by immunoassay and RT-PCR. The effect of the conditioned medium of hPMSCs with or without Slit2 depletion on endothelial cells was investigated by in vitro angiogenesis using growth factor-reduced Matrigel. hPMSCs express Slit2 and both Robo1 and Robo4 are present in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells do not express Robo2 and Robo3. The hPMSC-conditioned medium and Slit2 recombinant protein significantly inhibit the endothelial cell migration, but not by the hPMSC-conditioned medium with Slit2 depletion. The hPMSC-conditioned medium and Slit2 significantly enhance endothelial tube formation with increased cumulated tube length, polygonal network number and vessel branching point number compared to endothelial cells alone. The tube formation is inhibited by the depletion of Slit2 from the conditioned medium, or following the expression of Robo1, Robo4, and both receptor knockdown using small interfering RNA. Furthermore, co-immunoprecipitation reveals Slit2 binds to Robo1 and Robo4. Robo1 interacts and forms a heterodimeric complex with Robo4. These results suggest the implication of both Robo receptors with Slit2 signaling, which is involved in endothelial cell angiogenesis. Slit2 in the conditioned medium of hPMSCs has functional effect on endothelial cells and may play a role in placental angiogenesis.     

Robo4 is a vascular-specific receptor that inhibits endothelial migration

Guidance and patterning of axons are orchestrated by cell-surface receptors and ligands that provide directional cues. Interactions between the Robo receptor and Slit ligand families of proteins initiate signaling cascades that repel axonal outgrowth. Although the vascular and nervous systems grow as parallel networks, the mechanisms by which the vascular endothelial cells are guided to their appropriate positions remain obscure. We have identified a putative Robo homologue, Robo4, based on its differential expression in mutant mice with defects in vascular sprouting. In contrast to known neuronal Robo family members, the arrangement of the extracellular domains of Robo4 diverges significantly from that of all other Robo family members. Moreover, Robo4 is specifically expressed in the vascular endothelium during murine embryonic development. We show that Robo4 binds Slit and inhibits cellular migration in a heterologous expression system, analogous to the role of known Robo receptors in the nervous system. Immunoprecipitation studies indicate that Robo4 binds to Mena, a known effector of Robo-Slit signaling. Finally, we show that Robo4 is the only Robo family member expressed in primary endothelial cells and that application of Slit inhibits their migration. These data demonstrate that Robo4 is a bona fide member of the Robo family and may provide a repulsive cue to migrating endothelial cells during vascular development.     

Requirement of vasculogenesis and blood circulation in late stages of liver growth in zebrafish

Background

In the vascular system, Notch receptors and ligands are expressed mainly on arteries, with Delta-like 4 (Dll4) being the only ligand known to be expressed early during the development of arterial endothelial cells and capillaries. Dll4 null embryos die very early in development with severely reduced arterial calibre and lumen and loss of arterial cell identity.

Results

The current detailed analysis of these mutants shows that the arterial defect precedes the initiation of blood flow and that the arterial Dll4 ^-/- endothelial cells proliferate and migrate more actively. Dll4 ^-/- mutants reveal a defective basement membrane around the forming aorta and increased endothelial cell migration from the dorsal aorta to peripheral regions, which constitute the main causes of arterial lumen reduction in these embryos. The increased proliferation and migration of Dll4 ^-/- endothelial cells was found to coincide with increased expression of the receptors VEGFR-2 and Robo4 and with downregulation of the TGF-β accessory receptor Endoglin.

Conclusion

Together, these results strongly suggest that Notch signalling can increase arterial stability and calibre by decreasing the response of arterial endothelial cells to local gradients of pro-angiogenic factors like VEGF.     

Beyond DNA binding - a review of the potential mechanisms mediating quinacrine's therapeutic activities in parasitic infections,inflammation, and cancers

Background

Host cell invasion by the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni is considered as one of the primary reasons of gut tissue damage, however, mechanisms and key factors involved in this process are widely unclear. It was reported that small Rho GTPases, including Cdc42, are activated and play a role during invasion, but the involved signaling cascades remained unknown. Here we utilised knockout cell lines derived from fibronectin^-/-, integrin-beta1^-/-, focal adhesion kinase (FAK)^-/- and Src/Yes/Fyn^-/- deficient mice, and wild-type control cells, to investigate C. jejuni-induced mechanisms leading to Cdc42 activation and bacterial uptake.

Results

Using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy, GTPase pulldowns, G-Lisa and gentamicin protection assays we found that each studied host factor is necessary for induction of Cdc42-GTP and efficient invasion. Interestingly, filopodia formation and associated membrane dynamics linked to invasion were only seen during infection of wild-type but not in knockout cells. Infection of cells stably expressing integrin-beta1 variants with well-known defects in fibronectin fibril formation or FAK signaling also exhibited severe deficiencies in Cdc42 activation and bacterial invasion. We further demonstrated that infection of wild-type cells induces increasing amounts of phosphorylated FAK and growth factor receptors (EGFR and PDGFR) during the course of infection, correlating with accumulating Cdc42-GTP levels and C. jejuni invasion over time. In studies using pharmacological inhibitors, silencing RNA (siRNA) and dominant-negative expression constructs, EGFR, PDGFR and PI3-kinase appeared to represent other crucial components upstream of Cdc42 and invasion. siRNA and the use of Vav1/2^-/- knockout cells further showed that the guanine exchange factor Vav2 is required for Cdc42 activation and maximal bacterial invasion. Overexpression of certain mutant constructs indicated that Vav2 is a linker molecule between Cdc42 and activated EGFR/PDGFR/PI3-kinase. Using C. jejuni mutant strains we further demonstrated that the fibronectin-binding protein CadF and intact flagella are involved in Cdc42-GTP induction, indicating that the bacteria may directly target the fibronectin/integrin complex for inducing signaling leading to its host cell entry.

Conclusion

Collectively, our findings led us propose that C. jejuni infection triggers a novel fibronectin→integrin-beta1→FAK/Src→EGFR/PDGFR→PI3-kinase→Vav2 signaling cascade, which plays a crucial role for Cdc42 GTPase activity associated with filopodia formation and enhances bacterial invasion.     

Activation of endothelial roundabout receptor 4 reduces the severity of virus-induced keratitis

Antiangiogenic molecules exert a feedback control to restrain pathological angiogenesis, which includes physical binding or inhibition of angiogenic signaling in blood vessel endothelial cells. The latter is the case in which Slit2 ligand-dependent activation of the blood vessel endothelial cell receptor roundabout 4 (Robo4) occurs. In this study, we demonstrate that Robo4 receptors are upregulated following HSV infection of the eye on the majority of the new blood vessel endothelial cells that occur in the corneal stroma. However, expression levels of the ligand for Robo4 receptors, Slit2, was not significantly increased during the disease process, and the knockdown of Slit2 gene expression using lentiviral short hairpin RNAs had no effect on the extent of pathological angiogenesis. In contrast, providing additional Slit2 protein by subconjunctival administration resulted in significantly reduced angiogenesis. The Slit2 binding to Robo4 was shown to block the downstream vascular endothelial growth factor signaling molecules Arf 6 and Rac 1 and reduce the antiapoptotic molecule Bcl-xL in blood vessel endothelial cells. Our results indicate that augmenting the host Robo4/Slit2 system could provide a useful therapeutic approach to control pathological angiogenesis associated with HSV induced stromal keratitis.     

Signal transduction in neuronal migration: roles of GTPase activating proteins and the small GTPase Cdc42 in the Slit-Robo pathway.

The Slit protein guides neuronal and leukocyte migration through the transmembrane receptor Roundabout (Robo). We report here that the intracellular domain of Robo interacts with a novel family of Rho GTPase activating proteins (GAPs). Two of the Slit-Robo GAPs (srGAPs) are expressed in regions responsive to Slit. Slit increased srGAP1-Robo1 interaction and inactivated Cdc42. A dominant negative srGAP1 blocked Slit inactivation of Cdc42 and Slit repulsion of migratory cells from the anterior subventricular zone (SVZa) of the forebrain. A constitutively active Cdc42 blocked the repulsive effect of Slit. These results have demonstrated important roles for GAPs and Cdc42 in neuronal migration. We propose a signal transduction pathway from the extracellular guidance cue to intracellular actin polymerization.     

Slit coordinates cardiac morphogenesis in Drosophila

Slit is a secreted guidance cue that conveys repellent or attractive signals from target and guidepost cells. In Drosophila, responsive cells express one or more of three Robo receptors. The cardial cells of the developing heart express both Slit and Robo2. This is the first report of coincident expression of a Robo and its ligand. In slit mutants, cardial cell alignment, polarization and uniform migration are disrupted. The heart phenotype of robo2 mutants is similar, with fewer migration defects. In the guidance of neuronal growth cones in Drosophila, there is a phenotypic interaction between slit and robo heterozygotes, and also with genes required for Robo signaling. In contrast, in the heart, slit has little or no phenotypic interaction with Robo-related genes, including Robo2, Nck2, and Disabled. However, there is a strong phenotypic interaction with Integrin genes and their ligands, including Laminin and Collagen, and intracellular messengers, including Talin and ILK. This indicates that Slit participates in adhesion or adhesion signaling during heart development.     

Crossing the midline: roles and regulation of Robo receptors

In the Drosophila CNS, the midline repellent Slit acts at short range through its receptor Robo to control midline crossing. Longitudinal axons express high levels of Robo and avoid the midline; commissural axons that cross the midline express only low levels of Robo. Robo levels are in turn regulated by Comm. Here, we show that the Slit receptors Robo2 and Robo3 ensure the fidelity of this crossing decision: rare crossing errors occur in both robo2 and robo3 single mutants. In addition, low levels of either Robo or Robo2 are required to drive commissural axons through the midline: only in robo,robo2 double mutants do axons linger at the midline as they do in slit mutants. Robo2 and Robo3 levels are also tightly regulated, most likely by a mechanism similar to but distinct from the regulation of Robo by Comm.     

Slit/Robo-mediated axon guidance in Tribolium and Drosophila: divergent genetic programs build insect nervous systems

As the complexity of animal nervous systems has increased during evolution, developmental control of neuronal connectivity has become increasingly refined. How has functional diversification within related axon guidance molecules contributed to the evolution of nervous systems? To address this question, we explore the evolution of functional diversity within the Roundabout (Robo) family of axon guidance receptors. In Drosophila, Robo and Robo2 promote midline repulsion, while Robo2 and Robo3 specify the position of longitudinal axon pathways. The Robo family has expanded by gene duplication in insects; robo2 and robo3 exist as distinct genes only within dipterans, while other insects, like the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum, retain an ancestral robo2/3 gene. Both Robos from Tribolium can mediate midline repulsion in Drosophila, but unlike the fly Robos cannot be down-regulated by Commissureless. The overall architecture and arrangement of longitudinal pathways are remarkably conserved in Tribolium, despite it having only two Robos. Loss of TcSlit causes midline collapse of axons in the beetle, a phenotype recapitulated by simultaneous knockdown of both Robos. Single gene knockdowns reveal that beetle Robos have specialized axon guidance functions: TcRobo is dedicated to midline repulsion, while TcRobo2/3 also regulates longitudinal pathway formation. TcRobo2/3 knockdown reproduces aspects of both Drosophila robo2 and robo3 mutants, suggesting that TcRobo2/3 has two functions that in Drosophila are divided between Robo2 and Robo3. The ability of Tribolium to organize longitudinal axons into three discrete medial–lateral zones with only two Robo receptors demonstrates that beetle and fly achieve equivalent developmental outcomes using divergent genetic programs.     

Transgelin 2 Participates in Lovastatin-Induced Anti-Angiogenic Effects in Endothelial Cells through a Phosphorylated Myosin Light Chain-Related Mechanism

Background

Anti-angiogenic activity is considered to play a key role in the statin-induced anti-tumor effects. We aimed to identify new targets underlying this pleiotropic effect of lovastatin.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We investigated the inhibitory effects of lovastatin on endothelial cell biology and angiogenesis in vitro. Lovastatin at high doses inhibited endothelial cell migration and tube formation. Using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis followed by mass spectrometry, we identified the up-regulation of the actin-binding protein transgelin 2 in endothelial cells following treatment with lovastatin. Changes in transgelin 2 levels were confirmed by Western blot and confocal microscopy. We further demonstrated that the Rho signaling inactivation and actin depolymerization contributed to the up-regulation of transgelin 2. The knockdown of transgelin 2 by siRNA dramatically enhanced endothelial migration and tube formation, and meanwhile attenuated the inhibitory effects of lovastatin on cell motility. Moreover, the lovastatin-induced inhibition of myosin light chain phosphorylation was also reversed by transgelin 2 knockdown. The activation of Rho GTPase in the absence of transgelin 2 may represent a mechanism underlying the regulation of phosphorylated myosin light chain by transgelin 2.

Conclusions/Significance

These results strongly imply a novel role for transgelin 2 in the angiostatic activities of lovastatin.     

Cleaved Slit directs embryonic muscles

The formation of functional musculoskeletal system relies on proper connectivity between muscles and their corresponding tendon cells. In Drosophila, larval muscles are born during early embryonic stages, and elongate toward tendons that are embedded within the ectoderm in later. The Slit/Robo signaling pathway had been implicated in the process of muscle elongation toward tendons. Here we discuss our recent findings regarding the critical contribution of Slit cleavage for immobilization and stabilization of the Slit signal on the tendon cells. Slit cleavage produces 2 polypeptides, the N-terminal Slit-N, which is extremely stable, undergoes oligomerization, and associates with the tendon cell surfaces, and the C-terminal Slit-C, which rapidly degrades. Slit cleavage leads to immobilization of Slit signaling on tendons, leading to a short-range repulsion, which eventually arrest further muscle elongation. Robo2, which is co-expressed with Slit by the tendon cells facilitates Slit cleavage. This activity does not require the cytoplasmic signaling domain of Robo2. We suggest that Robo2-dependent Slit cleavage, and the formation of Slit-N oligomers on the tendon cell surfaces direct muscle elongation, and provide a stop signal for the approaching muscle, through binding to Robo and Robo3 receptors expressed by the muscles.     

Slit2/Robo4 signaling modulates HIV-1 gp120-induced lymphatic hyperpermeability

Dissemination of HIV in the host involves transit of the virus and virus-infected cells across the lymphatic endothelium. HIV may alter lymphatic endothelial permeability to foster dissemination, but the mechanism is largely unexplored. Using a primary human lymphatic endothelial cell model, we found that HIV-1 envelope protein gp120 induced lymphatic hyperpermeability by disturbing the normal function of Robo4, a novel regulator of endothelial permeability. HIV-1 gp120 induced fibronectin expression and integrin α₅β₁ phosphorylation, which led to the complexing of these three proteins, and their subsequent interaction with Robo4 through its fibronectin type III repeats. Moreover, pretreatment with an active N-terminus fragment of Slit2, a Robo4 agonist, protected lymphatic endothelial cells from HIV-1 gp120-induced hyperpermeability by inhibiting c-Src kinase activation. Our results indicate that targeting Slit2/Robo4 signaling may protect the integrity of the lymphatic barrier and limit the dissemination of HIV in the host.     

Endothelial cell injury by high glucose and heparanase is prevented by insulin, heparin and basic fibroblast growth factor

Background

Uncontrolled hyperglycemia is the main risk factor in the development of diabetic vascular complications. The endothelial cells are the first cells targeted by hyperglycemia. The mechanism of endothelial injury by high glucose is still poorly understood. Heparanase production, induced by hyperglycemia, and subsequent degradation of heparan sulfate may contribute to endothelial injury. Little is known about endothelial injury by heparanase and possible means of preventing this injury.

Objectives

To determine if high glucose as well as heparanase cause endothelial cell injury and if insulin, heparin and bFGF protect cells from this injury.

Methods

Cultured porcine aortic endothelial cells were treated with high glucose (30 mM) and/or insulin (1 U/ml) and/or heparin (0.5 μg/ml) and /or basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (1 ng/ml) for seven days. Cells were also treated with heparinase I (0.3 U/ml, the in vitro surrogate heparanase), plus insulin, heparin and bFGF for two days in serum free medium. Endothelial cell injury was evaluated by determining the number of live cells per culture and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release into medium expressed as percentage of control.

Results

A significant decrease in live cell number and increase in LDH release was found in endothelial cells treated with high glucose or heparinase I. Insulin and/or heparin and/or bFGF prevented these changes and thus protected cells from injury by high glucose or heparinase I. The protective ability of heparin and bFGF alone or in combination was more evident in cells damaged with heparinase I than high glucose.

Conclusion

Endothelial cells injured by high glucose or heparinase I are protected by a combination of insulin, heparin and bFGF, although protection by heparin and/or bFGF was variable.     

Blockade of ARHGAP11A reverses malignant progress via inactivating Rac1B in hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

The molecular signaling events involving in high malignancy and poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are extremely complicated. Blockade of currently known targets has not yet led to successful clinical outcome. More understanding about the regulatory mechanisms in HCC is necessary for developing new effective therapeutic strategies for HCC patients.

Methods

The expression of Rho GTPase-activating protein 11A (ARHGAP11A) was examined in human normal liver and HCC tissues. The correlations between ARHGAP11A expression and clinicopathological stage or prognosis in HCC patients were analyzed. ARHGAP11A was downregulated to determine its role in the proliferation, invasion, migration, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) development, and regulatory signaling of HCC cells in vitro and in vivo.

Results

ARHGAP11A exhibited high expression in HCC, and was significantly correlated with clinicopathological stage and prognosis in HCC patients. Moreover, ARHGAP11A facilitated Hep3B and MHCC97-H cell proliferation, invasion, migration and EMT development in vitro. ARHGAP11A knockdown significantly inhibited the in vivo growth and metastasis of HCC cells. Furthermore, ARHGAP11A directly interacted with Rac1B independent of Rho GTPase- activating activity. Rac1B blockade effectively interrupted ARHGAP11A-elicited HCC malignant phenotype. Meanwhile, upregulation of Rac1B reversed ARHGAP11A knockdown mediated mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) development in HCC cells.

Conclusion

ARHGAP11A facilitates malignant progression in HCC patients via ARHGAP11A-Rac1B interaction. The ARHGAP11A/Rac1B signaling could be a potential therapeutic target in the clinical treatment of HCC.

     

The Function of Two Rho Family GTPases Is Determined by Distinct Patterns of Cell Surface Localization

Rho family GTPases are critical regulators in determining and maintaining cell polarity. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rho3 and Cdc42 play important but distinct roles in regulating polarized exocytosis and overall polarity. Cdc42 is highly polarized during bud emergence and is specifically required for exocytosis at this stage. In contrast, Rho3 appears to play an important role during the isotropic growth of larger buds. Using a novel monoclonal antibody against Rho3, we find that Rho3 localizes to the cell surface in a dispersed pattern which is clearly distinct from that of Cdc42. Using chimeric forms of these GTPases, we demonstrate that a small region at the N terminus is necessary and sufficient to confer Rho3 localization and function onto Cdc42. Analysis of this domain reveals two essential elements responsible for distinguishing function. First, palmitoylation of a cysteine residue by the Akr1 palmitoyltransferase is required both for the switch of function and the switch of localization properties of this domain. Second, two basic residues distal to the palmitoylation site are required for regulating binding affinity with the Exo70 and Sec3 effectors. This demonstrates the importance of localization and effector binding in determining how these GTPases evolved specific functions at distinct stages of polarized growth.Cell polarity is a highly conserved feature of eukaryotic cells and is important for a number of events in animal cell biology, including embryonic development, cell migration, and epithelial function (21). The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae provides a simple model system in which to understand cell polarity, as much of the machinery that is responsible for polarity between yeast and animal cells is highly conserved. Rho/Cdc42 family GTPases are examples of this conservation and have been shown to be critical determinants of polarity in both yeast and animal cells. Rho GTPases are thought to exert their effects on cell polarization through regulation of a number of cellular processes, including the cytoskeleton and polarized delivery of new membrane to sites of active growth.Previous studies have demonstrated that Rho3 and Cdc42 have direct roles in regulating exocytosis which are independent of their role in regulating the polarity of the actin cytoskeleton (1, 2). Studies from a number of laboratories have shown that a multisubunit vesicle tethering complex known as the exocyst is likely to be a critical effector for Rho/Cdc42 signaling during polarized exocytosis (1, 2, 11, 22). A number of models have been suggested to describe the action of Rho GTPases in regulating exocytic function (28, 30). Analysis of specific loss-of-function alleles of RHO3 and CDC42 demonstrated that defects in secretion could be distinguished not only from actin polarity but from the polarization of the exocytic machinery as well. This led to the suggestion that Rho GTPases act by local activation rather than recruitment of the exocytic machinery (25).Genetic analysis suggests that the pathway by which Cdc42 regulates secretion is closely linked to that of Rho3. Secretion-defective alleles in each of these GTPases are suppressed by a common set of genes, and the mutants exhibit synthetic lethality when combined in the same cell (1). Recent work has provided direct evidence that the Exo70 subunit of the exocyst both genetically and physically interacts with both Rho3 and Cdc42 (29).Although Rho3 and Cdc42 share a effector and have overlapping functions, there are different characteristics in how these two proteins regulate exocytosis in yeast. Analysis of the Rho3 and Cdc42 secretory mutants by electron microscopy and secretory assays revealed that cdc42-6 mutants showed defects only in cells with small or emerging buds; in contrast, rho3-V51 mutants exhibited secretory defects throughout bud growth (1, 2). These phenotypes suggested that the exocytic function of Rho3 and Cdc42 is required at overlapping but distinct stages of bud growth.Most small GTPases require multiple elements to promote their association with the membrane on which they engage their downstream targets (26). Modification of the C-terminal CAAX motif by prenylation is common to both Rho3 and Cdc42, with Rho3 predicted to be farnesylated and Cdc42 shown to be geranylgeranylated (14, 17, 19). However, as with other small GTPases, C-terminal prenylation by itself is not sufficient for stable membrane association (10, 18). As with many other small GTPases, a second site of interaction is thought to be required for both Rho3 and Cdc42 GTPases. Sequence alignment of Rho3 and Cdc42 revealed that Rho3 has a long N-terminal extension, which contains a site (a cysteine at position 5) for palmitoylation (24). In contrast, Cdc42 is not palmitoylated but instead contains a polybasic domain adjacent to the CAAX motif at its C terminus, which is thought to act as a membrane targeting signal via the electrostatic interactions with phospholipids at the plasma membrane (6, 12).In this study we examine how the function and localization of two Rho GTPases are specified at distinct stages of polarized growth in yeast. Using a novel monoclonal antibody, we find that the pattern of cell surface localization observed for the Rho3 GTPase is clearly distinct from that of Cdc42. Using chimeric forms of these GTPases, we find that the N terminus plays a particularly important role in this specification. The functional effect imparted by the N terminus appears to have two key elements. One element involves palmitoylation of a cysteine in the N terminus of Rho3 that is critical in generating the dispersed pattern of localization observed for Rho3. A second element regulates the affinity of the GTPases for a common effector, the exocyst complex. Taken together, this work provides a model for how these GTPases have evolved distinct functions by adopting sequence elements that affect both the pattern of localization and the ability to engage the downstream effector in a way that allows each GTPase to function at different stages of polarized growth.