Maximal chromosome compaction occurs by axial shortening in anaphase and depends on Aurora kinase

Eukaryotic cells must first compact their chromosomes before faithfully segregating them during cell division. Failure to do so can lead to segregation defects with pathological consequences, such as aneuploidy and cancer. Duplicated interphase chromosomes are, therefore, reorganized into tight rods before being separated and directed to the newly forming daughter cells. This vital reorganization of chromatin remains poorly understood. To address the dynamics of mitotic condensation of single chromosomes in intact cells, we developed quantitative assays based on confocal time-lapse microscopy of live mammalian cells stably expressing fluorescently tagged core histones. Surprisingly, maximal compaction was not reached in metaphase, but in late anaphase, after sister chromatid segregation. We show that anaphase compaction proceeds by a mechanism of axial shortening of the chromatid arms from telomere to centromere. Chromatid axial shortening was not affected in condensin-depleted cells, but depended instead on dynamic microtubules and Aurora kinase. Acute perturbation of this compaction resulted in failure to rescue segregation defects and in multilobed daughter nuclei, suggesting functions in chromosome segregation and nuclear architecture.     

Separase is required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I in Caenorhabditis elegans.

BACKGROUND: Chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis is triggered by dissolution of sister chromatid cohesion, which is mediated by the cohesin complex. Mitotic sister chromatid disjunction requires that cohesion be lost along the entire length of chromosomes, whereas homolog segregation at meiosis I only requires loss of cohesion along chromosome arms. During animal cell mitosis, cohesin is lost in two steps. A nonproteolytic mechanism removes cohesin along chromosome arms during prophase, while the proteolytic cleavage of cohesin's Scc1 subunit by separase removes centromeric cohesin at anaphase. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans, meiotic sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by Rec8, a meiosis-specific variant of cohesin's Scc1 subunit. Homolog segregation in S. cerevisiae is triggered by separase-mediated cleavage of Rec8 along chromosome arms. In principle, chiasmata could be resolved proteolytically by separase or nonproteolytically using a mechanism similar to the mitotic "prophase pathway." RESULTS: Inactivation of separase in C. elegans has little or no effect on homolog alignment on the meiosis I spindle but prevents their timely disjunction. It also interferes with chromatid separation during subsequent embryonic mitotic divisions but does not directly affect cytokinesis. Surprisingly, separase inactivation also causes osmosensitive embryos, possibly due to a defect in the extraembryonic structures, referred to as the "eggshell." CONCLUSIONS: Separase is essential for homologous chromosome disjunction during meiosis I. Proteolytic cleavage, presumably of Rec8, might be a common trigger for the first meiotic division in eukaryotic cells. Cleavage of proteins other than REC-8 might be necessary to render the eggshell impermeable to solutes.     

Fission yeast cells undergo nuclear division in the absence of spindle microtubules

Mitosis in eukaryotic cells employs spindle microtubules to drive accurate chromosome segregation at cell division. Cells lacking spindle microtubules arrest in mitosis due to a spindle checkpoint that delays mitotic progression until all chromosomes have achieved stable bipolar attachment to spindle microtubules. In fission yeast, mitosis occurs within an intact nuclear membrane with the mitotic spindle elongating between the spindle pole bodies. We show here that in fission yeast interference with mitotic spindle formation delays mitosis only briefly and cells proceed to an unusual nuclear division process we term nuclear fission, during which cells perform some chromosome segregation and efficiently enter S-phase of the next cell cycle. Nuclear fission is blocked if spindle pole body maturation or sister chromatid separation cannot take place or if actin polymerization is inhibited. We suggest that this process exhibits vestiges of a primitive nuclear division process independent of spindle microtubules, possibly reflecting an evolutionary intermediate state between bacterial and Archeal chromosome segregation where the nucleoid divides without a spindle and a microtubule spindle-based eukaryotic mitosis.     

Deletion und Translokation heterochromatischer Chromosomenabschnitte bei Microtus agrestis

Zusammenfassung In unbehandelten Nierenepithel-und Fibroblastenkulturen von Microtus agrestis wurden Brüche, Deletionen und Translokationen an den heterochromatischen langen Armen von X-und Y-Chromosomen in 2% aller Mitosen eines weiblichen und 3% der Mitosen eines männlichen Tieres gefunden. In tetraploiden Mitosen sind Deletionen häufiger als in diploiden zu finden. Die Deletionen treten sowohl auf dem X₁ und X₂ des Weibchens als auch auf dem X und Y des Männchens auf. Längenmessungen an normalen und deletierten Chromosomen ergaben, daß die bevorzugte Bruchlokalisation beim X-Chromosom am Übergang vom proximalen zum mittleren Drittel der langen Arme liegt, beim Y in der Mitte der langen Arme. Es wurden Translokationen der azentrischen Fragmente auf die langen Arme von X-Chromosomen und Fusion deletierter X-Chromosomen zu dizentrischen Chromosomen beobachtet, jedoch keine Translokation auf euchromatische Chromosomen. Das häufigere Auftreten von ein oder zwei deletierten Chromosomen in tetraploiden Zellen wird durch Fusion zweier diploider (Schwester-) Kerne in zweikernigen Zellen erklärt die durch Mitose ohne nachfolgende Plasmateilung einer diploiden Zelle mit Chromatidbruch oder deletiertem Chromosome entstanden sind.

---

Deletion and translocation of heterochromatic chromosome segments of Microtus agrestis

Summary Breaks, deletions and translocations of the heterochromatic long arms of the X and Y chromosomes were found in 2% of all female mitoses and 3% of male mitoses of untreated kidney epithelial cell and fibroblast cultures of Microtus agrestis. Deletions are more frequent in tetraploid than in diploid mitoses. Deletions were found in the X₁ and X₂ of the female as well as in the X and Y of the male. Length measurements of normal and deleted chromosomes showed that the breaks in the X are preferentially located between the proximal and middle third of the long arm, whereas in the Y chromosome they are near the middle of the long arm. Translocations of acentric fragments to the long arms of X chromosomes and fusions of deleted X chromosomes resulting in dicentric chromosomes were also observed, but no translocations to euchromatic chromosomes could be found. The relatively high frequency of one or two deleted chromosomes in tetraploid cells is explained by a fusion of two diploid (sister-) nuclei in binucleated cells resulting from mitosis without cytoplasmic division of diploid cells with a break of a chromatid or a deleted chromosome.

---

---

Mit Unterstützung durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.     

DNase I sensitivity in facultative and constitutive heterochromatin

In situ nick translation allows the detection of DNase I sensitive and insensitive regions in fixed mammalian mitotic chromosomes. We have determined the difference in DNase I sensitivity between the active and inactive X chromosomes inMicrotus agrestis (rodent) cells, along both their euchromatic and constitutive heterochromatic regions. In addition, we analysed the DNase I sensitivity of the constitutive heterochromatic regions in mouse chromosomes. InMicrotus agrestis female cells the active X chromosome is sensitive to DNase I along its euchromatic region while the inactive X chromosome is insensitive except for an early replicating region at its distal end. The late replicating constitutive heterochromatic regions, however, in both the active and inactive X chromosome are sensitive to DNase I. In mouse cells on the other hand, the constitutive heterochromatin is insensitive to DNase I both in mitotic chromosomes and interphase nuclei.     

Labelling of DNA and differential sister chromatid staining after BrdU treatment in vivo

A method of labelling DNA in vivo with 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) is described. After 6 h permanent subcutaneous infusion of BrdU in rodents (adult Microtus agrestis, pregnant NMRI-mice), cell nuclei which have undergone DNA synthesis during the BrdU treatment can be differentiated from the nuclei of other cycle stages by means of their altered staining behaviour after Giemsa. 24 h after the BrdU treatment, mitoses from both bone marrow of the adult animals and tissues from the fetuses showed a differential sister chromatid staining. In male M. agrestis, sister chromatid exchanges were most frequently found in the euchromatic part of the X and in the constitutive heterochromatin of both sex chromosomes.     

Involvement of chromatid cohesiveness at the centromere and chromosome arms in meiotic chromosome segregation: A cytological approach

Kinetochores and chromatid cores of meiotic chromosomes of the grasshopper species Arcyptera fusca and Eyprepocnemis plorans were differentially silver stained to analyse the possible involvement of both structures in chromatid cohesiveness and meiotic chromosome segregation. Special attention was paid to the behaviour of these structures in the univalent sex chromosome, and in B univalents with different orientations during the first meiotic division. It was observed that while sister chromatid of univalents are associated at metaphase I, chromatid cores are individualised independently of their orientation. We think that cohesive proteins on the inner surface of sister chromatids, and not the chromatid cores, are involved in the chromatid cohesiveness that maintains associated sister chromatids of bivalents and univalents until anaphase I. At anaphase I sister chromatids of amphitelically oriented B univalents or spontaneous autosomal univalents separate but do not reach the poles because they remain connected at the centromere by a long strand which can be visualized by silver staining, that joins stretched sister kinetochores. This strand is normally observed between sister kinetochores of half-bivalents at metaphase II and early anaphase II. We suggest that certain centromere proteins that form the silver-stainable strand assure chromosome integrity until metaphase II. These cohesive centromere proteins would be released or modified during anaphase II to allow normal chromatid segregation. Failure of this process during the first meiotic division could lead to the lagging of amphitelically oriented univalents. Based on our results we propose a model of meiotic chromosome segregation. During mitosis the cohesive proteins located at the centromere and chromosome arms are released during the same cellular division. During meiosis those proteins must be sequentially inactivated, i.e. those situated on the inner surface of the chromatids must be eliminated during the first meiotic division while those located at the centromere must be released during the second meiotic division.by D.P. Bazett-Jones     

Pattern of repetitive DNA of the chromosomes of Microtus agrestis

The distribution of repetitive DNA in the chromosomes of Microtus agrestis was studied with the method for demonstrating constitutive heterochromatin given by Yunis et al. (1971) and the reassociation technique described by Schnedl (1971). All autosomes can be individually recognized by means of the position of their bands. The euchromatic segment of the X1 chromosome shows the same banding pattern as the corresponding segment of X2 which consists of facultative heterochromatin. The short arms of the Y chromosome are not deeply stained with either method and therefore do not contain noticeable amounts of repetitive DNA. The relative distances between the bands remain constant during chromosome contraction in mitosis.     

Cell division control by the Chromosomal Passenger Complex

The Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) consisting of Aurora B kinase, INCENP, Survivin and Borealin, is essential for genomic stability by controlling multiple processes during both nuclear and cytoplasmic division. In mitosis it ensures accurate segregation of the duplicated chromosomes by regulating the mitotic checkpoint, destabilizing incorrectly attached spindle microtubules and by promoting the axial shortening of chromosomal arms in anaphase. During cytokinesis the CPC most likely prevents chromosome damage by imposing an abscission delay when a chromosome bridge connects the two daughter cells. Moreover, by controlling proper cytoplasmic division, the CPC averts tetraploidization. This review describes recent insights on how the CPC is capable of conducting its various functions in the dividing cell to ensure chromosomal stability.     

Histone H1 is essential for mitotic chromosome architecture and segregation in Xenopus laevis egg extracts

During cell division, condensation and resolution of chromosome arms and the assembly of a functional kinetochore at the centromere of each sister chromatid are essential steps for accurate segregation of the genome by the mitotic spindle, yet the contribution of individual chromatin proteins to these processes is poorly understood. We have investigated the role of embryonic linker histone H1 during mitosis in Xenopus laevis egg extracts. Immunodepletion of histone H1 caused the assembly of aberrant elongated chromosomes that extended off the metaphase plate and outside the perimeter of the spindle. Although functional kinetochores assembled, aligned, and exhibited poleward movement, long and tangled chromosome arms could not be segregated in anaphase. Histone H1 depletion did not significantly affect the recruitment of known structural or functional chromosomal components such as condensins or chromokinesins, suggesting that the loss of H1 affects chromosome architecture directly. Thus, our results indicate that linker histone H1 plays an important role in the structure and function of vertebrate chromosomes in mitosis.     

Tritiated uridine induced chromosome aberrations in relation to heterochromatin and nucleolar organisation in Microtus agrestis L.

Microtus agrestis is characterised by long sex chromosomes, most of which are constitutively heterochromatic, and thus supposedly, genetically inactive. A method to assess the template activity of the chromosomes is to study the distribution of chromatid aberrations produced by H³UdR, among and within the chromosomes. In such a study, in female Microtus agrestis cells in culture, it was found that, a large number of localised chromatid aberrations was induced in the constitutively heterochromatic regions of both X chromosomes. The frequency distribution and types of aberrations were found to be cell cycle dependent. With differential staining it has been possible to demonstrate that the constitutive heterochromatin of the sex chromosomes are involved in the nucleolar organisation in this species, thus containing the ribosomal RNA cistrons.     

Induced chromosomal exchange directs the segregation of recombinant chromatids in mitosis of Drosophila.

In meiosis, the segregation of chromosomes at the reductional division is accomplished by first linking homologs together. Genetic exchange generates the bivalents that direct regular chromosome segregation. We show that genetic exchange in mitosis also generates bivalents and that these bivalents direct mitotic chromosome segregation. After FLP-mediated homologous recombination in G2 of the cell cycle, recombinant chromatids consistently segregate away from each other (x segregation). This pattern of segregation also applies to exchange between heterologs. Most, or all, cases of non-x segregation are the result of exchange in G1. Cytological evidence is presented that confirms the existence of the bivalents that direct this pattern of segregation. Our results implicate sister chromatid cohesion in maintenance of the bivalent. The pattern of chromatid segregation can be altered by providing an additional FRT at a more proximal site on one chromosome. We propose that sister chromatid exchange occurs at the more proximal site, allowing the recombinant chromatids to segregate together. This also allowed the recovery of reciprocal translocations following FLP-mediated heterologous recombination. The observation that exchange can generate a bivalent in mitotic divisions provides support for a simple evolutionary relationship between mitosis and meiosis.     

Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells

We investigated positioning of chromosomes during the cell cycle in live mammalian cells with a combined experimental and computational approach. By non-invasive labeling of chromosome subsets and tracking by 4D imaging, we could show that no global rearrangements occurred in interphase. Using the same assay, we also observed a striking order of chromosomes throughout mitosis. By contrast, our computer simulation based on stochastic movements of individual chromosomes predicted randomization of chromosome order in mitosis. In vivo, a quantitative assay for single chromosome positioning during mitosis revealed strong similarities between daughter and mother cells. These results demonstrate that global chromosome positions are heritable through the cell cycle in mammalian cells. Based on tracking of labeled chromosomes and centromeres during chromosome segregation and experimental perturbations of chromosomal order, we propose that chromosome specific timing of sister chromatid separation transmits chromosomal positions from one cell generation to the next.     

Dual role of topoisomerase II in centromere resolution and aurora B activity

Chromosome segregation requires sister chromatid resolution. Condensins are essential for this process since they organize an axial structure where topoisomerase II can work. How sister chromatid separation is coordinated with chromosome condensation and decatenation activity remains unknown. We combined four-dimensional (4D) microscopy, RNA interference (RNAi), and biochemical analyses to show that topoisomerase II plays an essential role in this process. Either depletion of topoisomerase II or exposure to specific anti-topoisomerase II inhibitors causes centromere nondisjunction, associated with syntelic chromosome attachments. However, cells degrade cohesins and timely exit mitosis after satisfying the spindle assembly checkpoint. Moreover, in topoisomerase II–depleted cells, Aurora B and INCENP fail to transfer to the central spindle in late mitosis and remain tightly associated with centromeres of nondisjoined sister chromatids. Also, in topoisomerase II–depleted cells, Aurora B shows significantly reduced kinase activity both in S2 and HeLa cells. Codepletion of BubR1 in S2 cells restores Aurora B kinase activity, and consequently, most syntelic attachments are released. Taken together, our results support that topoisomerase II ensures proper sister chromatid separation through a direct role in centromere resolution and prevents incorrect microtubule–kinetochore attachments by allowing proper activation of Aurora B kinase.     

The condensin subunits SMC2 and SMC4 interact for correct condensation and segregation of mitotic maize chromosomes

Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes 2 (SMC2) and Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes 4 (SMC4) are the core components of the condensin complexes, which are required for chromosome assembly and faithful segregation during cell division. Because of the crucial functions of both proteins in cell division, much work has been done in various vertebrates, but little information is known about their roles in plants. Here, we identified ZmSMC2 and ZmSMC4 in maize (Zea mays) and confirmed that ZmSMC2 associates with ZmSMC4 via their hinge domains. Immunostaining revealed that both proteins showed dynamic localization during mitosis. ZmSMC2 and ZmSMC4 are essential for proper chromosome segregation and for H3 phosphorylation at Serine 10 (H3S10ph) at pericentromeres during mitotic division. The loss of function of ZmSMC2 and ZmSMC4 enlarges mitotic chromosome volume and impairs sister chromatid separation to the opposite poles. Taken together, these findings confirm and extend the coordinated role of ZmSMC2 and ZmSMC4 in maintenance of normal chromosome architecture and accurate segregation during mitosis.     

Random Segregation of Chromatids at Mitosis in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Previous experiments suggest that mitotic chromosome segregation in some fungi is a nonrandom process in which chromatids of the same replicative age are destined for cosegregation. We have investigated the pattern of chromatid segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by labeling the DNA of a strain auxotrophic for thymidine with 5-bromodeoxyuridine. The fate of DNA strands was followed qualitatively by immunofluorescence microscopy and quantitatively by microphotometry using an anti-5-bromodeoxyuridine monoclonal antibody. Chromatids of the same replicative age were distributed randomly to daughter cells at mitosis. Quantitative measurements showed that the amount of fluorescence in the daughter nuclei derived from parents with hemilabeled chromosomes diminished in intensity by one half. The concentration of 5-bromodeoxyuridine used in the experiments had little effect on the frequency of either homologous or sister chromatid exchanges. We infer that the 5-bromodeoxyuridine was distributed randomly due to mitotic segregation of chromatids and not via sister chromatid exchanges.     

Mitotic checkpoints and the maintenance of the chromosome karyotype

The goal of the mitotic cell division is the faithful transmission of chromosomes to the daughter cells. To fulfil a correct separation of sister chromatids, kinetochores of all chromosomes should be correctly attached to spindle microtubules of opposite poles and should all be under tension. These events are monitored by the spindle checkpoint, which delays mitotic progression allowing time for corrections when errors occur in the dynamic interactions between chromosomes and microtubules. The G(1) post-mitotic checkpoint constitutes an additional checkpoint preventing further proliferation of cells that have undergone massive spindle damage. This review concentrates on the key structural and protein components which are pivotal for an accurate segregation of chromosomes during anaphase: the chromosome scaffold, sister chromatid cohesion and segregation and the kinetochores in higher eukaryotes. Furthermore, recent advances in understanding spindle and G(1) post-mitotic checkpoint and how they prevent aneuploidization and polyploidization are presented. In a last part the impact of aneuploidy and polyploidy on human health and in particular on cancer development is highlighted.     

The Yin and Yang of centromeric cohesion of sister chromatids: mitotic kinases meet protein phosphatase 2A

Accurate chromosome segregation during meiosis and mitosis is essential for the maintenance of genomic stability. Defects in the regulation of chromosome segregation during division predispose cells to undergo mitotic catastrophe or neoplastic transformation. Cohesin, a molecular glue holding sister chromatids together, is removed from chromosomes in a stepwise fashion during mitosis and meiosis. Cohesin at centromeres but not on chromosome arm remains intact until anaphase onset during early mitosis and the initiation of anaphase II during meiosis. Several recent studies indicate that the activity of protein phosphatase 2A is essential for maintaining the integrity of centromeric cohesin. Shugoshin, a guardian for sister chromatid segregation, may cooperate with and/or mediate PP2A function by suppressing the phosphorylation status of centromeric proteins including cohesin.     

Formation and division of binucleated cells in kidney cell cultures of microtus agrestis

Summary Epithelial kidney cell cultures of Microtus agrestis contain 10 to 25% binucleated cells. Observations of living cells under the phase contrast microscope showed that binucleated cells can arise by nuclear mitosis without cytoplasmic division. When binucleated cells divide the two nuclei are highly synchronized as they enter mitosis. In mitosis the chromosomes of both nuclei combine to a common metaphase plate leading to polyploid cells. In one case a tripolar spindle was seen after formation of a metaphase by the chromosomes of the two nuclei of a binucleated cell. This tripolar mitosis resulted in one binucleated and one mononucleated cell. The DNA-content (Feulgen photometry) and the distribution of heterochromatic bodies of the nuclei were corresponding to a tetraploid, a triploid and a haploid chromosome set. This suggests the possibility of somatic segregation of complete haploid sets.Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.     

Unpicking neurodegeneration in a dish with human pluripotent stem cells

Eukaryotic cell division is an orderly and timely process involving the error-free segregation of chromosomes and cytoplasmic components to give rise to two separate daughter cells. Defects in genome maintenance mechanisms such as cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair can impact the segregation of the genome during mitosis leading to multiple chromosomal imbalances. In mammals, the DNA damage checkpoint effector Checkpoint Kinase 1 (Chk1) is essential for responses to DNA replication errors, external DNA damage, and chromatin breaks. We reported recently that Chk1 also was essential for chromosome segregation and completion of cytokinesis to prevent genomic instability. Our studies demonstrated that Chk1 deficiency in mitotic cells causes chromosome mis-alignment, lagging chromosomes, chromosome mis- segregation, cytokinetic regression, and binucleation. In addition, abrogation of Chk1 resulted in aberrant localization of mitotic Aurora B kinase at the metaphase plate, anaphase spindle midzone, and cytokinetic midbody as studied both in various cell lines and in a mouse model. Therefore, inappropriate regulation of Chk1 levels during cell cycle progression will result in failed cell division and enhanced genomic instability.