A Novel Endoplasmic Reticulum Export Signal: PROLINE AT THE +2-POSITION FROM THE SIGNAL PEPTIDE CLEAVAGE SITE*

NUCB1 (nucleobindin 1) is a Golgi-localized soluble protein with a signal peptide and multiple functional domains. We reported recently that NUCB1 is a negative regulator of the unfolded protein response that activates various endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-originating signaling pathways. In that report, we also showed that Golgi localization of NUCB1 was essential to regulate the unfolded protein response. However, the localization mechanism of NUCB1 is still unknown. Here, we report that the proline residue at the +2-position (Pro⁺²) from the signal peptide cleavage site is the determinant of NUCB1 protein export from the ER and subsequent transport to the Golgi. Fusion of the N-terminal amino acids 1–35 peptide region, including both signal peptide (amino acids 1–26) and Pro⁺², was sufficient for enhanced green fluorescent protein to localize in the Golgi, whereas single amino acid mutation of Pro⁺² resulted in defective export from the ER without affecting the protein maturation process. Furthermore, we demonstrated that Pro⁺² was important for the enhanced green fluorescent protein fusion protein to concentrate at a transport vesicle formation site within the ER, often termed the ER exit site. Interestingly, such a Pro⁺² has also been functionally conserved in other Golgi-localized soluble proteins, Cab45 (Ca²⁺-binding protein of 45 kDa), reticulocalbin 1, and calumenin. Our findings indicate that Pro⁺² can function as a novel ER export signal of some Golgi proteins.NUCB1 (nucleobindin 1), also known as calnuc, was first identified as a soluble secretory 55-kDa protein (461 amino acids) in lupus-prone mice with the lymphoproliferation (lpr) mutation (1). NUCB1 has also been shown to be secreted in culture supernatant of a murine B cell line established from the mice (2). Later studies also demonstrated that NUCB1 is expressed ubiquitously and localizes in the Golgi apparatus of intact cells (3, 4). NUCB1 contains multiple putative functional domains, including an N-terminal endoplasmic reticulum (ER)² signal peptide, a DNA binding site, a leucine zipper domain, two EF-hand Ca²⁺-binding sites, a nuclear localization signal, and G-protein-binding and cyclooxygenase-binding domains (1, 5, 6). Consistently, NUCB1 has been reported to function in various cellular processes, including osteogenesis, inflammation, autoimmunity, intracellular signaling, and cancer (6–10).Newly synthesized, premature NUCB1 protein is first targeted into the ER via its N-terminal ER signal peptide. After removal of the signal peptide in the ER, a mature NUCB1 protein is transported to the Golgi apparatus and then secreted to the extracellular matrix (11). NUCB1 in the Golgi pool is probably involved in establishing the agonist-mobilizable Golgi Ca²⁺ store (3). Furthermore, the Golgi-localized NUCB1 regulates the unfolded protein response, which is a cellular stress response that triggers various events, such as ER-resident molecular chaperone induction, translational repression, and apoptosis under ER stress conditions (12). On the other hand, extracellular NUCB1 has been suggested to serve as a modulator of matrix maturation in bone, based on the observations that NUCB1 is secreted by osteoblasts and osteocytes and can, indeed, be detected in the osteoid extracellular matrix (7, 13). Thus, Golgi transport and subsequent secretion of NUCB1 seem to be important to exert the protein''s activity, but little is known about its transport regulation mechanism.In eukaryotic cells, a tremendous variety of soluble and membrane cargo proteins are packaged into transport vesicles at the ER. Vesicle formation on the ER membrane begins with the assembly of a coat protein complex II (COPII) (14). This COPII coat consists of Sar1, Sec23-Sec24, and Sec13-Sec31 complexes that are sequentially recruited to the ER membrane. Sar1 is a small GTPase that regulates coat assembly and disassembly. To assemble the COPII coat, Sar1-GTP transiently associates with an export cargo protein and then binds to Sec23-Sec24, which in turn attracts Sec13-Sec31 (14). Polymerization of the formed COPII coat, which occurs at the so-called ER exit site (ERES), triggers transport vesicle budding on the ER membrane (14, 15). Then the vesicles fuse with the VTC compartment (vesiculo-tubular clusters, also called ERGIC) that mediates further protein transport to the Golgi apparatus. Cargo proteins are then carried to their final destinations, such as organelle, cell surface membrane, and extracellular matrix (14).Recent studies reveal that some transmembrane cargoes contain specific motifs to be selectively concentrated in the transport vesicle within the ER. This sorting motif is called the ER export signal. Representative ER export signals are the diacidic motif (DXE), dihydrophobic (LL) motif, and diaromatic motif (FF, YY) that have been found in vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein, ERGIC-53, and Emp46p, respectively (16–18). These export signals are present in the cytoplasmic region of the cargo proteins and mediate their interaction with the COPII complex at the outer side of the ER membrane, resulting in concentration in the newly formed budding vesicle. On the other hand, the soluble type of cargo proteins require their cargo receptor to be sorted into the COPII vesicle, because they cannot interact directly with COPII complex, since these proteins have no cytoplasmic region. Although recent studies have reported the existence of the cargo receptor and functional ER export signals found in some soluble cargo proteins, little is known about many other cargo receptors and the export signals of soluble cargo proteins (19, 20).Here, we report that Pro²⁸, which is located at the +2-position (Pro⁺²) from the signal peptide cleavage site of the NUCB1 protein, is a determinant of its export from the ER. In fact, single amino acid substitution (P28A) led to predominant ER distribution and reduced the secretion of NUCB1 without affecting its maturation process in the ER. We also demonstrated that Pro⁺² is required for concentration at the ERES. It is important to note that Pro⁺² was also conserved functionally in other proteins. Our results indicate that Pro⁺² can function as a new ER export signal.     

Ubiquitination Regulates Proteolytic Processing of G Protein-coupled Receptors after Their Sorting to Lysosomes

Ubiquitination is essential for the endocytic sorting of various G protein-coupled receptors to lysosomes. Here we identify a distinct function of this covalent modification in controlling the later proteolytic processing of receptors. Mutation of all cytoplasmic lysine residues in the murine δ-opioid receptor blocked receptor ubiquitination without preventing ligand-induced endocytosis of receptors or their subsequent delivery to lysosomes, as verified by proteolysis of extramembrane epitope tags and down-regulation of radioligand binding to the transmembrane helices. Surprisingly, a functional screen revealed that the E3 ubiquitin ligase AIP4 specifically controls down-regulation of wild type receptors measured by radioligand binding without detectably affecting receptor delivery to lysosomes defined both immunochemically and biochemically. This specific AIP4-dependent regulation required direct ubiquitination of receptors and was also regulated by two deubiquitinating enzymes, AMSH and UBPY, which localized to late endosome/lysosome membranes containing internalized δ-opioid receptor. These results identify a distinct function of AIP4-dependent ubiquitination in controlling the later proteolytic processing of G protein-coupled receptors, without detectably affecting their endocytic sorting to lysosomes. We propose that ubiquitination or ubiquitination/deubiquitination cycling specifically regulates later proteolytic processing events required for destruction of the receptor''s hydrophobic core.A fundamental cellular mechanism contributing to homeostatic regulation of receptor-mediated signal transduction involves ligand-induced endocytosis of receptors followed by proteolysis in lysosomes. The importance of such proteolytic down-regulation has been documented extensively for a number of seven-transmembrane or G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs),³ which comprise the largest known family of signaling receptors expressed in animals, as well as for other important signaling receptors, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (1–5).One GPCR that is well known to undergo endocytic trafficking to lysosomes is the δ-opioid peptide receptor (DOR or DOP-R) (6). Following endocytosis, DOR traffics efficiently to lysosomes in both neural and heterologous cell models (6–8), whereas many membrane proteins, including various GPCRs, recycle rapidly to the plasma membrane (9–12). Such molecular sorting of internalized receptors between divergent recycling and degradative pathways is thought to play a fundamental role in determining the functional consequences of regulated endocytosis (2, 3, 13, 14). The sorting process that directs internalized DOR to lysosomes is remarkably efficient and appears to occur rapidly (within several min) after receptor endocytosis (11). Nevertheless, biochemical mechanisms that control lysosomal trafficking and proteolysis of DOR remain poorly understood.A conserved mechanism that promotes lysosomal trafficking of a number of membrane proteins, including various signaling receptors, is mediated by covalent modification of cytoplasmic lysine residues with ubiquitin (4, 15–17). Ubiquitination was first identified as an endocytic sorting determinant in studies of vacuolar trafficking of the yeast GPCR Ste2p (18). Subsequent studies have established numerous examples of lysyl-ubiquitination being required for sorting endocytic cargo to lysosomes and have identified conserved machinery responsible for the targeting of ubiquitinated cargo to lysosomes (3, 17, 19–22).The CXCR4 chemokine receptor provides a clear example of ubiquitin-dependent lysosomal sorting of a mammalian GPCR. Ubiquitination of the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the CXCR4 receptor, mediated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase AIP4, is specifically required for the HRS- and VPS4-dependent trafficking of internalized receptors to lysosomes. Blocking this ubiquitination event by Lys → Arg mutation of the receptor specifically inhibits trafficking of internalized receptors to lysosomes, resulting in recycling rather than lysosomal proteolysis of receptors after ligand-induced endocytosis (23–25).Lysosomal trafficking of DOR, in contrast, is not prevented by mutation of cytoplasmic lysine residues (26) and can be regulated by ubiquitination-independent protein interaction(s) (27, 28). Nevertheless, both wild type and lysyl-mutant DORs traffic to lysosomes via a similar pathway as ubiquitin-dependent membrane cargo and require both HRS and active VPS4 to do so (29). These observations indicate that DOR engages the same core endocytic mechanism utilized by ubiquitination-directed membrane cargo but leave unresolved whether ubiquitination of DOR plays any role in this important cellular mechanism of receptor down-regulation.There is no doubt that DOR can undergo significant ubiquitination in mammalian cells, including HEK293 cells (30–32), where lysosomal trafficking of lysyl-mutant receptors was first observed (26). Ubiquitination was shown previously to promote proteolysis of DOR by proteasomes and to function in degrading misfolded receptors from the biosynthetic pathway (30, 31). A specific role of ubiquitination in promoting proteasome- but not lysosome-mediated proteolysis of DOR has been emphasized (32) and proposed to contribute to proteolytic down-regulation of receptors also from the plasma membrane (33).To our knowledge, no previous studies have determined if DOR ubiquitination plays any role in controlling receptor proteolysis mediated by lysosomes, although this represents a predominant pathway by which receptors undergo rapid down-regulation following ligand-induced endocytosis in a number of cell types, including HEK293 cells (8). In the present study, we have taken two approaches to addressing this fundamental question. First, we have investigated in greater detail the effects of lysyl-mutation on DOR ubiquitination and trafficking. Second, we have independently investigated the role of ubiquitination in controlling lysosomal proteolysis of wild type DOR. Our results clearly establish the ability of DOR to traffic efficiently to lysosomes in the absence of any detectable ubiquitination. Further, they identify a distinct and unanticipated function of AIP4-dependent ubiquitination in regulating the later proteolytic processing of receptors and show that this distinct ubiquitin-dependent regulatory mechanism operates effectively downstream of the sorting decision that commits internalized receptors for delivery to lysosomes.     

Identification of Regulatory and Cargo Proteins of Endosomal and Secretory Pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana by Proteomic Dissection

The cell''s endomembranes comprise an intricate, highly dynamic and well-organized system. In plants, the proteins that regulate function of the various endomembrane compartments and their cargo remain largely unknown. Our aim was to dissect subcellular trafficking routes by enriching for partially overlapping subpopulations of endosomal proteomes associated with endomembrane markers. We selected RABD2a/ARA5, RABF2b/ARA7, RABF1/ARA6, and RABG3f as markers for combinations of the Golgi, trans-Golgi network (TGN), early endosomes (EE), secretory vesicles, late endosomes (LE), multivesicular bodies (MVB), and the tonoplast. As comparisons we used Golgi transport 1 (GOT1), which localizes to the Golgi, clathrin light chain 2 (CLC2) labeling clathrin-coated vesicles and pits and the vesicle-associated membrane protein 711 (VAMP711) present at the tonoplast. We developed an easy-to-use method by refining published protocols based on affinity purification of fluorescent fusion constructs to these seven subcellular marker proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. We present a total of 433 proteins, only five of which were shared among all enrichments, while many proteins were common between endomembrane compartments of the same trafficking route. Approximately half, 251 proteins, were assigned to one enrichment only. Our dataset contains known regulators of endosome functions including small GTPases, SNAREs, and tethering complexes. We identify known cargo proteins such as PIN3, PEN3, CESA, and the recently defined TPLATE complex. The subcellular localization of two GTPase regulators predicted from our enrichments was validated using live-cell imaging. This is the first proteomic dataset to discriminate between such highly overlapping endomembrane compartments in plants and can be used as a general proteomic resource to predict the localization of proteins and identify the components of regulatory complexes and provides a useful tool for the identification of new protein markers of the endomembrane system.Membrane compartmentalization is an essential mechanism for eukaryotic life, by which cells separate and control biological processes. Plant growth, development, and adaptation to biotic and abiotic stress all rely on the highly dynamic endomembrane system, yet we know comparatively little about the proteins regulating these dynamic trafficking events. The plasma membrane (PM) provides the main interface between the cell and its environment, mediating the transfer of material to and from the cell and is a primary site for perception of external signals. Transmembrane proteins are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and trafficked to the PM via the Golgi, although there are other secretory routes for soluble cargo (discussed in (1–4)). Post-Golgi trafficking is the main route by which newly synthesized transmembrane proteins and cell wall glycans are delivered to the PM. In plants, secretory and endocytic traffic converge at the trans-Golgi network (TGN), which also functions as an early endosome (EE). Multivesicular bodies (MVBs) are the other main endosomal compartment in plants and serve as prevacuolar compartments (PVCs) or late endosomes (LE) destined for vacuolar degradation (reviewed (1, 5, 6)).Recycling and sorting of plasma membrane proteins is essential for generating the polar localization of auxin efflux transporters (discussed in (7)), formation of the cell plate during cell division (8–11), and in defense such as localized deposition of papilla reviewed in (12, 13). Furthermore, the subcellular localization of transporters and receptors is dynamically regulated. For example, the boron transporter (BOR1) exhibits polar localization and is internalized and degraded under conditions of high boron to reduce toxicity (14, 15). Similarly the receptor-like kinases (RLKs) flagellin-sensing 2 (FLS2) and brassinosteroid insensitive 1 (BRI1), important transmembrane receptors in antibacterial immunity and plant development, respectively, are constitutively endocytosed and recycled to the PM (16–18). Both receptors and transporters are also cargoes of the LE/MVB trafficking route (16) and are probably sorted to the vacuole for degradation (19, 20). Importantly, FLS2 trafficking via the recycling endocytic or the late endocytic route depends on its activation status; inactive receptors are recycled while ligand-activated receptors are sorted to the late endosomal pathway (16). Similarly, the polar sorting of auxin efflux transporters depends on their phosphorylation status (21). These observations illustrate that membrane compartmentalization underpins important aspects of plant cell biology and has initiated a quest toward a better understanding of the endomembrane compartments and the routes and mechanisms by which cargo is trafficked and sorted within the cell.Membrane trafficking within the cell requires complex machinery consisting of a plethora of coat and adaptor proteins, small GTPases, targeting, tethering, and scission factors (reviewed in (22, 23)). Homologues of some animal and yeast and endomembrane regulators have been identified in plants, but the localization and function of many of these remain to be characterized. For example, members of the RAB GTPase family have been shown to have markedly different roles and localizations in plants compared with their animal and yeast homologs (24). Therefore, acquiring localization data for tethering complexes and other regulators in plant systems is essential. In Arabidopsis thaliana, some of these proteins have been developed as useful probes to visualize the different endomembrane compartments by fusion with fluorescent reporters (9, 25–27). These include regulators of trafficking events such as RAB GTPases that are molecular switches responsible for the assembly of tethering and docking complexes and compartment identity. RAB proteins are widely used markers of endomembrane compartments, for example RABD2a/ARA5 labels the Golgi and TGN/EE as well as post-Golgi vesicles (4, 24, 26, 28), RABF2b/ARA7 localizes to TGN/EE and LE (25), RABF1/ARA6 is a marker of the LE/MVB vesicles (25, 29), and RABG3f localizes to MVBs and the tonoplast (26, 30).Fluorescent-tagged marker lines for the live-cell imaging of plant cells have been invaluable in defining the location of proteins within and between organelles and endomembrane compartments (26). However, microscopic investigation of membrane trafficking is limited by throughput, as only few proteins can be studied simultaneously. A powerful approach to large-scale identification of proteins in endomembrane compartments is through subcellular fractionation based on physical properties to directly isolate or enrich for the subcellular compartment of interest. Subcellular fractionation-based proteomics have been successfully used to decipher the steady state and cargo proteomes of, including but not limited to, the ER, the vacuole, PM, mitochondria and chloroplasts, and smaller vesicle-like compartments such as peroxisomes and Golgi (31–41). However, the smaller, transitory vesicles of the secretory and endocytic pathways have proved challenging to purify for reliable proteomic analysis. To overcome this, affinity purification of vesicles was established in animal cells (42, 43) and recently successfully applied in plants in combination with subcellular fractionation. Affinity purification and mass spectrometry (MS) of syntaxin of plants 61 (SYP61)-positive TGN/EE compartments identified 145 proteins specifically enriched in (44), while affinity isolation of VHA-a1-GFP (vacuolar H⁺ ATPase A1) identified 105 proteins associated with the TGN/EE (45). The VHA-A1 affinity purification data were then further refined using density gradient centrifugation to differentiate cargo and steady-state proteins (45).We have further explored affinity purification of fluorescent-tagged markers localizing to defined compartments to identify proteins associated with trafficking. Our motivation was to dissect the trafficking routes by enriching for partially overlapping subpopulations of endosomal proteomes associated with small GTPases in the RAB family. We selected RABD2a/ARA5, RABF2b/ARA7, RABF1/ARA6, and RABG3f as markers for Golgi/TGN/EE/secretory vesicles, LE/MVB compartments, LE/MVB compartments and LE/MVB/tonoplast, respectively. Additionally, we used Golgi transport 1 (GOT1), which localizes to the Golgi, clathrin light chain 2 (CLC2) labeling clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) and pits and the vesicle-associated membrane protein 711 (VAMP711) present at the tonoplast (26, 27, 29, 46, 47) as comparisons. Our objective was to identify transient cargo proteins, tethers, and docking factors associated with dynamic subdomains of the endomembrane system, to supplement better-characterized “steady-state” components, and to identify components of recycling and vacuolar trafficking pathways.     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]     

Identification of CRM1-dependent Nuclear Export Cargos Using Quantitative Mass Spectrometry

Chromosome region maintenance 1/exportin1/Exp1/Xpo1 (CRM1) is the major transport receptor for the export of proteins from the nucleus. It binds to nuclear export signals (NESs) that are rich in leucines and other hydrophobic amino acids. The prediction of NESs is difficult because of the extreme recognition flexibility of CRM1. Furthermore, proteins can be exported upon binding to an NES-containing adaptor protein. Here we present an approach for identifying targets of the CRM1-export pathway via quantitative mass spectrometry using stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture. With this approach, we identified >100 proteins from HeLa cells that were depleted from cytosolic fractions and/or enriched in nuclear fractions in the presence of the selective CRM1-inhibitor leptomycin B. Novel and validated substrates are the polyubiquitin-binding protein sequestosome 1, the cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), the guanine nucleotide-binding protein-like 3-like protein, the programmed cell death protein 2-like protein, and the cytosolic carboxypeptidase 1 (CCP1). We identified a functional NES in CCP1 that mediates direct binding to the export receptor CRM1. The method will be applicable to other nucleocytoplasmic transport pathways, as well as to the analysis of nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins under different growth conditions.The transport of macromolecules across the nuclear envelope occurs through large proteinaceous structures called nuclear pore complexes (NPCs).¹ NPCs are composed of ∼30 nucleoporins that occur in copy numbers of eight or multiples of eight, leading to a complex with a total size of ∼125 MDa in vertebrate cells (1, 2). Active nucleocytoplasmic transport of proteins is a signal- and energy-dependent process that is mostly mediated by transport receptors of the importin β-superfamily called karyopherins or importins/exportins (3, 4). These proteins interact not only with their cargos, but also with certain nucleoporins, facilitating the translocation of the transport complex across the NPC. For nuclear export, at least seven nuclear export receptors/exportins have been identified (3, 4). Chromosome region maintenance 1/exportin1/Exp1/Xpo1 (CRM1) is the most important export receptor for proteins in yeast and vertebrates, and it is also involved in the export of several RNA species (5). Very little is known about the interaction of CRM1 with nucleoporins. Binding to cargo molecules, in contrast, is very well described. Exported proteins typically carry a nuclear export signal (NES) that is enriched with leucines or other hydrophobic amino acids. Such leucine-rich NESs were first discovered in the HIV type 1 Rev protein (6) and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase inhibitor (7). The consensus sequence consists of four key hydrophobic amino acids (leucine, isoleucine, valine, and phenylalanine or methionine; denoted by Φ¹–Φ⁴) following the sequence Φ¹-(x)_2–3-Φ²-(x)_2–3-Φ³-(x)-Φ₄, with x preferentially being a charged polar or small amino acid (for a review, see Ref. 8). A structural analysis of different NES peptides revealed a fifth hydrophobic amino acid in some substrates involved in CRM1 recognition, leading to a revised consensus sequence of Φ⁰-(x)-Φ¹-(x)_2–3-Φ²-(x)_2–3-Φ³-(x)-Φ⁴ (9). In a very recent study, Chook and coworkers established a novel database, NESdb, for NES-containing proteins and analyzed the sequence requirements for proteins in that database in detail (10, 11). “Supraphysiological ” substrates with NESs that fulfill all criteria bind CRM1 with very high affinity and can outcompete other substrates (9, 12). Apart from linear sequences, CRM1 might recognize more complex export signals, such as in fatty acid binding protein 4, in which a functional NES is established only in the tertiary structure of the protein (13), or in snurportin 1 (SPN1), in which sequences outside of the NES proper contribute to CRM1 binding (14–16). This high level of complexity in the recognition sequence for the export receptor makes it very difficult to predict potential CRM1-dependent export cargos using bioinformatics tools. Nevertheless, >200 potential CRM substrates have been described so far (11, 17–19; see also NESbase 1.0 and NESdb).The small GTP-binding protein Ran also plays an essential role in CRM1-mediated nuclear export, as it binds cooperatively to the export receptor, together with the NES cargo. As the affinity of many NES substrates for CRM1 is rather low, the formation of this trimeric transport complex seems to be a rate-limiting step in nuclear export (20). On the nuclear side of the NPC, a number of accessory factors such as RanBP3 (21, 22), Nup98 (23), and NLP1 (24) can further promote the formation of export complexes. Following export, RanBP1 and RanGAP initiate the disassembly of the export complex (for a review, see Ref. 3).A powerful tool for the analysis of CRM1-mediated export is the fungal metabolite leptomycin B (LMB). LMB originally was discovered as an antifungal antibiotic in Streptomyces (25) and later turned out to be a specific and selective inhibitor of the CRM1-mediated nuclear export pathway (26, 27). It binds covalently to cysteine 528 in the NES-binding region of human CRM1 (28), preventing the formation of trimeric export complexes (for a review, see Ref. 5).We used a quantitative MS-based approach (stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)) to evaluate the nuclear export characteristics of proteins by measuring changes in their relative abundance in subcellular fractions after blocking the CRM1-mediated nuclear export with LMB. Using this approach, we identified known and novel CRM1-targets and characterized the NES of one cargo, cytosolic carboxypeptidase 1 (CCP1), in detail.     

A Small Conserved Domain in the Yeast Spa2p Is Necessary and Sufficient for Its Polarized Localization

SPA2 encodes a yeast protein that is one of the first proteins to localize to sites of polarized growth, such as the shmoo tip and the incipient bud. The dynamics and requirements for Spa2p localization in living cells are examined using Spa2p green fluorescent protein fusions. Spa2p localizes to one edge of unbudded cells and subsequently is observable in the bud tip. Finally, during cytokinesis Spa2p is present as a ring at the mother–daughter bud neck. The bud emergence mutants bem1 and bem2 and mutants defective in the septins do not affect Spa2p localization to the bud tip. Strikingly, a small domain of Spa2p comprised of 150 amino acids is necessary and sufficient for localization to sites of polarized growth. This localization domain and the amino terminus of Spa2p are essential for its function in mating. Searching the yeast genome database revealed a previously uncharacterized protein which we name, Sph1p (Spa2p homolog), with significant homology to the localization domain and amino terminus of Spa2p. This protein also localizes to sites of polarized growth in budding and mating cells. SPH1, which is similar to SPA2, is required for bipolar budding and plays a role in shmoo formation. Overexpression of either Spa2p or Sph1p can block the localization of either protein fused to green fluorescent protein, suggesting that both Spa2p and Sph1p bind to and are localized by the same component. The identification of a 150–amino acid domain necessary and sufficient for localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth and the existence of this domain in another yeast protein Sph1p suggest that the early localization of these proteins may be mediated by a receptor that recognizes this small domain.Polarized cell growth and division are essential cellular processes that play a crucial role in the development of eukaryotic organisms. Cell fate can be determined by cell asymmetry during cell division (Horvitz and Herskowitz, 1992; Cohen and Hyman, 1994; Rhyu and Knoblich, 1995). Consequently, the molecules involved in the generation and maintenance of cell asymmetry are important in the process of cell fate determination. Polarized growth can occur in response to external signals such as growth towards a nutrient (Rodriguez-Boulan and Nelson, 1989; Eaton and Simons, 1995) or hormone (Jackson and Hartwell, 1990a , b ; Segall, 1993; Keynes and Cook, 1995) and in response to internal signals as in Caenorhabditis elegans (Goldstein et al., 1993; Kimble, 1994; Priess, 1994) and Drosophila melanogaster (St Johnston and Nusslein-Volhard, 1992; Anderson, 1995) early development. Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergo polarized growth towards an external cue during mating and to an internal cue during budding. Polarization towards a mating partner (shmoo formation) and towards a new bud site requires a number of proteins (Chenevert, 1994; Chant, 1996; Drubin and Nelson, 1996). Many of these proteins are necessary for both processes and are localized to sites of polarized growth, identified by the insertion of new cell wall material (Tkacz and Lampen, 1972; Farkas et al., 1974; Lew and Reed, 1993) to the shmoo tip, bud tip, and mother–daughter bud neck. In yeast, proteins localized to growth sites include cytoskeletal proteins (Adams and Pringle, 1984; Kilmartin and Adams, 1984; Ford, S.K., and J.R. Pringle. 1986. Yeast. 2:S114; Drubin et al., 1988; Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Amatruda and Cooper, 1992; Lew and Reed, 1993; Waddle et al., 1996), neck filament components (septins) (Byers and Goetsch, 1976; Kim et al., 1991; Ford and Pringle, 1991; Haarer and Pringle, 1987; Longtine et al., 1996), motor proteins (Lillie and Brown, 1994), G-proteins (Ziman, 1993; Yamochi et al., 1994; Qadota et al., 1996), and two membrane proteins (Halme et al., 1996; Roemer et al., 1996; Qadota et al., 1996). Septins, actin, and actin-associated proteins localize early in the cell cycle, before a bud or shmoo tip is recognizable. How this group of proteins is localized to and maintained at sites of cell growth remains unclear.Spa2p is one of the first proteins involved in bud formation to localize to the incipient bud site before a bud is recognizable (Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Chant, 1996). Spa2p has been localized to where a new bud will form at approximately the same time as actin patches concentrate at this region (Snyder et al., 1991). An understanding of how Spa2p localizes to incipient bud sites will shed light on the very early stages of cell polarization. Later in the cell cycle, Spa2p is also found at the mother–daughter bud neck in cells undergoing cytokinesis. Spa2p, a nonessential protein, has been shown to be involved in bud site selection (Snyder, 1989; Zahner et al., 1996), shmoo formation (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990), and mating (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990; Chenevert et al., 1994; Yorihuzi and Ohsumi, 1994; Dorer et al., 1995). Genetic studies also suggest that Spa2p has a role in cytokinesis (Flescher et al., 1993), yet little is known about how this protein is localized to sites of polarized growth.We have used Spa2p green fluorescent protein (GFP)¹ fusions to investigate the early localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth in living cells. Our results demonstrate that a small domain of ∼150 amino acids of this large 1,466-residue protein is sufficient for targeting to sites of polarized growth and is necessary for Spa2p function. Furthermore, we have identified and characterized a novel yeast protein, Sph1p, which has homology to both the Spa2p amino terminus and the Spa2p localization domain. Sph1p localizes to similar regions of polarized growth and sph1 mutants have similar phenotypes as spa2 mutants.