DNAase I and cellular factors that affect chromatin structure

The use of DNAase I as a probe of chromatin structure is frequently fraught with problems of irreproducibility. We have recently evaluated this procedure, documented the sources of the problems, and standardized the method for reproducible results (Prentice and Gurley (1983) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 740, 134-144). We have now used this probe to detect differences in chromatin structure between cells blocked (1) in G1 phase by isoleucine deprivation, or (2) in early S phase by sequential use of isoleucine deprivation followed by release into the presence of hydroxyurea. The cells blocked in G1 phase have easily-digestible chromatin, while cells blocked in early S phase have chromatin which is much more resistant to DNAase I. These differences were found to be the result of diffusible factors found in the cytoplasm and nuclei of G1- and S-phase cells, respectively. The G1 cells contained a cytoplasmic factor which modulates the chromatin structure of S-phase nuclei to a more easily digestible state, while cells blocked in S phase contain a nuclear factor which modulates the chromatin structure of G1 nuclei to a state more resistant to digestion. DNAase I is much more sensitive to these cell cycle-specific chromatin changes than is micrococcal nuclease. The results indicate that, under controlled conditions, DNAase I should be a valuable probe for detecting chromatin structural changes associated with cell cycle traverse, differentiation, development, hormone action and chemical toxicity.     

DNAase I and cellular factors that affect chromatin structure

The use of DNAase I as a probe of chromatin structure is frequently fraught with problems of irreproducibility. We have recently evaluated this procedure, documented the sources of the problems, and standardized the method for reproducible results (Prentice and Gurley (1983) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 740, 134–144). We have now used this probe to detect differences in chromatin structure between cells blocked (1) in G₁ phase by isoleucine deprivation, or (2) in early S phase by sequential use of isoleucine deprivation followed by release into the presence of hydroxyurea. The cells blocked in G₁ phase have easily-digestible chromatin, while cells blocked in early S phase have chromatin which is much more resistant to DNAase I. These differences were found to be the result of diffusible factors found in the cytoplasm and nuclei of G₁- and S-phase cells, respectively. The G₁ cells contained a cytoplasmic factor which modulates the chromatin structure of S-phase nuclei to a more easily digestible state, while cells blocked in S phase contain a nuclear factor which modulates the chromatin structure of G₁ nuclei to a state more resistant to digestion. DNAase I is much more sensitive to these cell cycle-specific chromatin changes than is micrococcal nuclease. The results indicate that, under controlled conditions, DNAase I should be a valuable probe for detecting chromatin structural changes associated with cell cycle traverse, differentiation, development, hormone action and chemical toxicity.     

Condensation of chromatin into chromosomes preserves an open configuration but alters the DNase I hypersensitive cleavage sites of the transcribed gene

DNase I was used to probe the molecular organization of the chicken ovalbumin (OV) gene and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD) gene in interphase nuclei and in metaphase chromosomes of cultured chicken lymphoblastoid cells (MSB-1 line). The OV gene was not transcribed in this cell line, whereas the GPD gene was constitutively expressed. The GPD gene was more sensitive to DNase I digestion than the OV gene in both interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosomes, as determined by Southern blotting and liquid hybridization techniques. In addition, we observed DNase I hypersensitive sites around the 5' region of the GPD gene. These hypersensitive sites were not always at the same locations between the interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosomes. Our results suggest that chromatin condensation and decondensation during cell cycle alters nuclease hypersensitive cleavage sites.     

Changes in the organization of chromosomes during the cell cycle: response to ultraviolet light.

Fusion between mitotic and interphase cells results in the premature condensation of the interphase chromosomes into a morphology related to the position in the cell cycle at the time of fusion. These prematurely condensed chromosomes (PCC) have been used in conjunction with u.v. irradiation to examine the interphase chromosome condensation cycle of HeLa cells. The following observations have been made: (I) There is a progressive decondensation of the chromosomes during G1 which is accentuated by u.v. irradiation: (2) The chromosomes become more resistant to u.v.-induced decondensation during G2 and mitosis. (3) There is a close correlation between the degree of chromosome decondensation and the amount of unscheduled DNA synthesis induced by u.v. irradiation during G1 and mitosis: (4) Hydroxyurea enhances the ability of u.v. irradiation to promote the decondensation of chromosomes during G1, G2 and mitosis. Hydroxyurea also potentiates the lethal action of u.v. irradiation during mitosis and G1. These data are discussed in relation to the suggestion that chromosomes undergo a progressive decondensation during G1 and condensation during G2.     

Early chromosome condensation without cell fusion. I. Preliminary results with allogeneic and xenogeneic cells.

Early chromatin condensation in interphase cells (G1) of human peripheral blood lymphocytes has been induced without virus or cell fusion by exposure to allogeneic or xenogeneic mitotic cells. The event, although similar in some ways to the phenomenon described as "premature chromosome condensation," "chromosome pulverization," and "prophasing," differs in that it does not require the presence of viruses and cell fusion before mitosis proceeds in the G1 cell. Early chromatin condensation in interphase cells induced by mitotic cells only, consists of chromatids in the early or late G1 phase of the cell cycle that are not pulverized or fragmented at mitosis. Some of the chromosomes are twice as long as the metaphase chromosomes and exhibit natural bands. Almost twice as many of these bands are produced as by trypsin treatment of metaphase chromosomes. The nuclear membrane is intact and nucleoli are present, to which some chromosomes are attached. The DNA content of the precocious chromosomes in G1 is half the amount of the metaphase complement.     

BM28, a human member of the MCM2-3-5 family, is displaced from chromatin during DNA replication

We have recently cloned and characterized a human member (BM28) of the MCM2-3-5 family of putative relication factors (Todorov, I.T., R. Pepperkok, R.N. Philipova, S. Kearsey, W. Ansorge, and D. Werner. 1994. J. Cell Sci. 107:253-265). While this protein is located in the nucleus throughout interphase, we report here a dramatic alteration in its nuclear binding during the cell cycle. BM28 is retained in the nucleus after Triton X-100 extraction in G1 and early S phase cells, but is progressively lost as S phase proceeds, and little BM28 is retained in detergent-extracted G2 nuclei. BM28 that is resistant to extraction in G1 nuclei is removed by DNase I digestion, suggesting that the protein is chromatin associated. In addition, we present evidence for variations in the electrophoretic mobility of BM28 that may reflect posttranslational modifications of BM28 during the cell cycle. During mitosis, BM28 is present as a fast-migrating form, but on entry into G1, the protein is converted into a slow-migrating form. With the onset of S phase, the slow-migrating form is progressively converted into the fast form. BM28 is phosphorylated at all stages of the cell cycle, but during interphase the fast form is hyperphosphorylated compared with the slow form. These apparent changes in modification may reflect or effect changes in the nuclear binding of BM28. The behavior of BM28 is not dissimilar to related proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, such as Mcm2p, which are excluded from the nucleus after DNA replication. We speculate that BM28 may be involved in the control that limits eukaryotic DNA replication to one round per cell cycle.     

Cell cycle dependent alterations of chromatin structure in situ as revealed by the accessibility of the nuclear protein AF-2 to monoclonal antibodies.

We have recently described a novel nuclear antigen, AF-2, which is related to cell cycle dependent alterations of chromatin structure. We show by two parameter flow cytometry on a cell by cell basis that the antigen is accessible to specific monoclonal antibodies only in mitotic and postmitotic early G1-phase cells. The evaluation of nuclease susceptibility and AF-2 antigen accessibility reveals different subcompartments of the G1-phase of the cell cycle with distinct chromatin conformations. Digestion with DNase I seems to alter the chromatin structure according to concentration and this is reflected by an increase of the antigen accessibility. Chromatin in the more condensed early G1-phase is specifically digested by lower concentrations of the enzyme than chromatin in later stages of interphase. Chromatin from cells in the late-G1, S-, and G2-phases shows a higher relative resistance to DNase I and a reduced accessibility of the AF-2 antigen to monoclonal antibodies. Nuclease S1 has a similar effect on chromatin topology, as revealed by the reaction with anti-AF-2 antibodies, without digestion of detectable amounts of DNA. The antigen becomes available to the antibodies in almost all cells by digestion with high concentrations of DNase I or Nuclease S1.     

Common pathway of chromosome condensation in Mammalian cells

Chromatin folding in the interphase nucleus is not known. We compared the pattern of chromatin condensation in Indian muntjac, Chinese hamster ovary, murine pre B, and K562 human erythroleukemia cells during the cell cycle. Fluorescent microscopy showed that chromosome condensation follows a general pathway. Synchronized cells were reversibly permeabilized and used to isolate interphase chromatin structures. Based on their structures two major categories of intermediates were distinguished: (1) decondensed chromatin and (2) condensed chromosomal forms. (1) Chromatin forms were found between the G1 and mid-S phase involving veil-like, supercoiled, fibrous, ribboned structures; (2) condensing chromosomal forms appeared in the late-S, G2, and M phase, including strings, chromatin bodies, elongated pre-chromosomes, pre-condensed chromosomes, and metaphase chromosomes. Results demonstrate that interphase chromosomes are clustered in domains; condensing interphase chromosomes are linearly arranged. Our results raise questions related to telomer sequences and to the chemical nature of chromosome connectivity.     

Fluorimetric measurements and chromatin condensation patterns of nuclei from 3T3 cells throughout G1

Using two cytological methods based on nuclear morphology, quinacrine dihydrochloride (QDH) staining and premature chromosome condensation (PCC), it has been possible to identify cell cyle positions within G1 of growing and arrested 3T3 cells. The fluorescent intensity of QDH-stained interphase cells appears to decrease as the cells pass from mitosis to S phase. Likewise, the length and thickness of prematurely condensed chromatids can be related to the cells' position within the G1 period. Data are presented that deal with three interrelated topics: (1) We determined by fluorometric measurements of nuclei from 3T3 cells that the visual observation of the decrease in QDH fluorescence during G1 reflects an actual decrease in total fluorescence and not a dispersion of the fluorescent chromatin in a larger nuclear area. (2) We correlated the results obtained by QDH staining with those of PCC on the same cell samples blocked in G1 by different conditions. Serum-starved and contact-inhibited cell nuclei had the highest intensity, hydroxyurea-treated ones had the lowest intensity, while that of isoleucine-deprived cells was in between. The same relative order of G1 positions was obtained based on PCC morphology. Thus, both methods monitor the state of chromatin condensation and can be used to identify cell cycle position within G1.(3) We showed with both methods that the states of chromatin resulting from the various G1 blocking conditions differ from each other.     

Condensed chromatin and cell inactivation by single-hit kinetics

Mammalian cells are extremely sensitive to gamma rays at mitosis, the time at which their chromatin is maximally condensed. The radiation-induced killing of mitotic cells is well described by single-hit inactivation kinetics. To investigate if radiation hypersensitivity by single-hit inactivation correlated with chromatin condensation, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) K1 (wild-type) and xrs-5 (radiosensitive mutant) cells were synchronized by mitotic shake-off procedures and the densities of their chromatin cross sections and their radiosensitivities were measured immediately and 2 h into G1 phase. The chromatin of G1-phase CHO K1 cells was dispersed uniformly throughout their nuclei, and its average density was at least three times less than in the chromosomes of mitotic CHO K1 cells. The alpha-inactivation co-efficient of mitotic CHO K1 cells was approximately 2.0 Gy(-1) and decreased approximately 10-fold when cells entered G1 phase. The density of chromatin in CHO xrs-5 cell chromosomes at mitosis was greater than in CHO K1 cell chromosomes, and the radiosensitivity of mitotic CHO xrs-5 cells was the greatest with alpha = 5.1 Gy(-1). In G1 phase, CHO xrs-5 cells were slightly more resistant to radiation than when in mitosis, but a significant proportion of their chromatin was found to remain in condensed form adjacent to the nuclear membrane. These studies indicate that in addition to their known defects in DNA repair and V(D)J recombination, CHO xrs-5 cells may also be defective in some process associated with the condensation and/or dispersion of chromatin at mitosis. Their radiation hypersensitivity could result, in part, from their DNA remaining in compacted form during interphase. The condensation status of DNA in other mammalian cells could define their intrinsic radiosensitivity by single-hit inactivation, the mechanism of cell killing which dominates at the dose fraction size (1.8-2.0 Gy) most commonly used in radiotherapy.     

Staining with pyronin Y detects changes in conformation of RNA during mitosis and hyperthermia of CHO cells

Cellular RNA in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells synchronized in mitosis (M) or G2 phase, as well as in interphase cells subjected to hyperthermia (42 degrees C, 10 min), was stained with acridine orange (AO), ethidium bromide (EB), or pyronin Y (PY) and the resultant fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry. Total RNA content detected after staining with AO increased in M as compared to G2-phase cells, consistent with continued RNA synthesis during G2 phase. The content of double-stranded RNA, stained with EB (after DNase treatment), was also somewhat higher in M cells. In contrast, the stainability of RNA with PY decreased by 27% in M- compared to G2-phase cells. Furthermore, a decrease in stainability of RNA with PY was observed in G2 cells compared to cells in G1 phase. In separate experiments, RNA stainability with AO or EB was generally unaffected when interphase CHO cells were exposed to 42 degrees C for 10 min, though this same treatment resulted in a 26% decrease in RNA stainability with PY. The decreased PY stainability of cellular RNA in M or heat-treated cells was observed at a relatively narrow range of dye concentration (1.0-2.0 micrograms/ml). The observed hypochromicity of RNA coincides with dissociation of polyribosomes into single ribosomes known to occur during mitosis and following exposure to hyperthermia. It is presumed that the phenomenon involves selective denaturation and condensation of ribosomal (r) RNA by PY in single ribosomes which does not occur in polyribosomes. While the molecular mechanisms responsible for stabilization of rRNA in polyribosomes preventing its denaturation and condensation by PY are unknown, PY appears to be a sensitive probe that can be used to detect and study these changes in rRNA confirmation in situ.     

CELL CYCLE-SPECIFIC CHANGES IN HISTONE PHOSPHORYLATION ASSOCIATED WITH CELL PROLIFERATION AND CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION

Preparative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to examine histone phosphorylation in synchronized Chinese hamster cells (line CHO). Results showed that histone f1 phosphorylation, absent in G₁-arrested and early G₁-traversing cells, commences 2 h before entry of traversing cells into the S phase. It is concluded that f1 phosphorylation is one of the earliest biochemical events associated with conversion of nonproliferating cells to proliferating cells occurring on old f1 before synthesis of new f1 during the S phase. Results also showed that f3 and a subfraction of f1 were rapidly phosphorylated only during the time when cells were crossing the G₂/M boundary and traversing prophase. Since these phosphorylation events do not occur in G₁, S, or G₂ and are reduced greatly in metaphase, it is concluded that these two specific phosphorylation events are involved with condensation of interphase chromatin into mitotic chromosomes. This conclusion is supported by loss of prelabeled ³²PO₄ from those specific histone fractions during transition of metaphase cells into interphase G₁ cells. A model of the relationship of histone phosphorylation to the cell cycle is presented which suggests involvement of f1 phosphorylation in chromatin structural changes associated with a continuous interphase "chromosome cycle" which culminates at mitosis with an f3 and f1 phosphorylation-mediated chromosome condensation.     

DNA topoisomerase I and II activities during cell proliferation and the cell cycle in cultured mouse embryo fibroblast (C3H 10T1/2) cells

We have used C3H 10T1/2 cells to examine the regulation of topoisomerase activities during cell proliferation and the cell cycle. The specific activity of topoisomerase I was about 4-fold greater in proliferating (log phase) cells than in non-proliferating (confluent) cells. In synchronized cells, the bulk of the increased activity occurred during or just prior to S phase, depending upon the method of synchronization. A smaller increase in activity also occurred during G1 phase. The increase in activity during S phase was not altered by a hydroxyurea block at the G1/S phase boundary indicating that it is not directly coupled to DNA synthesis and is not the result of topoisomerase I gene dosage. The increase was inhibited by blocking cells at mid-G1 phase using isoleucine deprivation. Thus, the increase in activity during S phase is dependent on events occurring during mid- to late G1 phase. In contrast to the changes in topoisomerase I levels, the specific activity of topoisomerase II showed no detectable difference in proliferating vs non-proliferating cells. In addition, no detectable difference in topoisomerase II specific activity was seen in G1, S and M phases of the cell cycle. The differences in the activity profiles of the topoisomerases I and II during the cell cycle suggest that the two activities are regulated independently and may be required for different functions.     

Sequential phsophorylation of histone subfractions in the Chinese hamster cell cycle.

Ion exchange chromatography and preparative electrophoresis were used to examine the phosphorylation of histone f1 and f3 subfractions in synchronized Chinese hamster cells (line CHO). Three discrete f1 phosphorylation events were demonstrated to occur in sequence during the cell cycle. The first event (f1G1) commenced in G1 2 hours prior to entry of cells into S phase; the second event (f1s) commenced simultaneously with initiation of DNA synthesis; and the third event (f1M) commenced when cells entered mitosis. F1M phosphorylation occurred simultaneously with the phosphorylation of histone f3 (which is not phosphorylated during G1, S, or G2). Fractionation of f1 and f3 revealed no differences in these sequential phosphorylation patterns among the various f1 and f3 subfractions, indicating that these phosphorylations are general biochemical events of the cell cycle. Phosphorylated (f1G1) was found to accumulate in cells as they traversed THEIR CELL CYCLE. F1s was phosphorylated to twice the extent of f1G1, but f1s did not accumulate in the cells as they passed through interphase. F1M was phosphorylated to about 4 times the extent of the first phosphorylated form (f1G1). A model of the relationship of histone phosphorylation to the cell cycle is presented which suggests that (a) f1G1 phosphorylation is involved with chromatin structural changes necessary for cell proliferation; (b) f1s phosphorylation is involved with DNA replication; (c) F1M and f3 phosphorylations are involved in chromosome condensation.     

Accessibility of histone H4 gene of Physarum polycephalum to DNase I during the cell cycle

DNase I was used as a probe to detect conformational changes of the H4 histone gene of Physarum polycephalum during the cell cycle. The degradation of histone genes was followed by gel electrophoresis and hybridization with a probe for the H4 histone gene. It was found that even during mitosis when chromatin is condensed into chromosomes, the histone genes are preferentially degraded by DNase I. The histone genes retain a characteristic structure which is recognized by DNase I during all stages of the cell cycle and thus independently of the biosynthesis of histones.     

DNase I sensitive site in the core region of the human beta-globin origin of replication

HeLa cells were synchronized at late G1, early S, and late S phase of the cell cycle by nocodazole treatment. The cells were permeabilized with Triton X-100, digested with DNAse I, and extracted with 0.2 M ammonium sulfate to remove the digested chromatin. DNA was isolated from the residual chromatin attached to the nuclear matrix, digested with Hind III, and subjected to hybridization with [(32)P] labeled probe located upstream of the core region of the human beta-globin replication origin. The hybridization pattern revealed the existence of a DNase I sensitive site in the core region of the beta-globin replicator. The results suggest that association with the nuclear matrix induce alteration in the chromatin structure of the origin of replication that represents a more open chromatin configuration.     

The chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae autonomously replicating sequences changes during the cell division cycle.

The chromatin structures of two well-characterized autonomously replicating sequence (ARS) elements were examined at their chromosomal sites during the cell division cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The H4 ARS is located near one of the duplicate nonallelic histone H4 genes, while ARS1 is present near the TRP1 gene. Cells blocked in G1 either by alpha-factor arrest or by nitrogen starvation had two DNase I-hypersensitive sites of about equal intensity in the ARS element. This pattern of DNase I-hypersensitive sites was altered in synchronous cultures allowed to proceed into S phase. In addition to a general increase in DNase I sensitivity around the core consensus sequence, the DNase I-hypersensitive site closest to the core consensus became more nuclease sensitive than the distal site. This change in chromatin structure was restricted to the ARS region and depended on replication since cdc7 cells blocked near the time of replication initiation did not undergo the transition. Subsequent release of arrested cdc7 cells restored entry into S phase and was accompanied by the characteristic change in ARS chromatin structure.