Evolution of Conifer Diterpene Synthases: Diterpene Resin Acid Biosynthesis in Lodgepole Pine and Jack Pine Involves Monofunctional and Bifunctional Diterpene Synthases

Abscisic acid (ABA) induces stomatal closure and inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. The mechanisms in these two processes are not necessarily the same. It has been postulated that the ABA receptors involved in opening inhibition are different from those involved in closure induction. Here, we provide evidence that four recently identified ABA receptors (PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE1 [PYR1], PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE1 [PYL1], PYL2, and PYL4) are not sufficient for opening inhibition in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). ABA-induced stomatal closure was impaired in the pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4 quadruple ABA receptor mutant. ABA inhibition of the opening of the mutant’s stomata remained intact. ABA did not induce either the production of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide or the alkalization of the cytosol in the quadruple mutant, in accordance with the closure phenotype. Whole cell patch-clamp analysis of inward-rectifying K⁺ current in guard cells showed a partial inhibition by ABA, indicating that the ABA sensitivity of the mutant was not fully impaired. ABA substantially inhibited blue light-induced phosphorylation of H⁺-ATPase in guard cells in both the mutant and the wild type. On the other hand, in a knockout mutant of the SNF1-related protein kinase, srk2e, stomatal opening and closure, reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide production, cytosolic alkalization, inward-rectifying K⁺ current inactivation, and H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation were not sensitive to ABA.The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA), which is synthesized in response to abiotic stresses, plays a key role in the drought hardiness of plants. Reducing transpirational water loss through stomatal pores is a major ABA response (Schroeder et al., 2001). ABA promotes the closure of open stomata and inhibits the opening of closed stomata. These effects are not simply the reverse of one another (Allen et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2001; Mishra et al., 2006).A class of receptors of ABA was identified (Ma et al., 2009; Park et al., 2009; Santiago et al., 2009; Nishimura et al., 2010). The sensitivity of stomata to ABA was strongly decreased in quadruple and sextuple mutants of the ABA receptor genes PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE/PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE/REGULATORY COMPONENT OF ABSCISIC ACID RECEPTOR (PYR/PYL/RCAR; Nishimura et al., 2010; Gonzalez-Guzman et al., 2012). The PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors are involved in the early ABA signaling events, in which a sequence of interactions of the receptors with PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2Cs (PP2Cs) and subfamily 2 SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASES (SnRK2s) leads to the activation of downstream ABA signaling targets in guard cells (Cutler et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010; Weiner et al., 2010). Studies of Commelina communis and Vicia faba suggested that the ABA receptors involved in stomatal opening are not the same as the ABA receptors involved in stomatal closure (Allan et al., 1994; Anderson et al., 1994; Assmann, 1994; Schwartz et al., 1994). The roles of PYR/PYL/RCAR in either stomatal opening or closure remained to be elucidated.Blue light induces stomatal opening through the activation of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase in guard cells that generates an inside-negative electrochemical gradient across the plasma membrane and drives K⁺ uptake through voltage-dependent inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (Assmann et al., 1985; Shimazaki et al., 1986; Blatt, 1987; Schroeder et al., 1987; Thiel et al., 1992). Phosphorylation of the penultimate Thr of the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase is a prerequisite for blue light-induced activation of the H⁺-ATPase (Kinoshita and Shimazaki, 1999, 2002). ABA inhibits H⁺-ATPase activity through dephosphorylation of the penultimate Thr in the C terminus of the H⁺-ATPase in guard cells, resulting in prevention of the opening (Goh et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 2004; Hayashi et al., 2011). Inward-rectifying K⁺ currents (I_Kin) of guard cells are negatively regulated by ABA in addition to through the decline of the H⁺ pump-driven membrane potential difference (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Blatt, 1990; McAinsh et al., 1990; Schwartz et al., 1994; Grabov and Blatt, 1999; Saito et al., 2008). This down-regulation of ion transporters by ABA is essential for the inhibition of stomatal opening.A series of second messengers has been shown to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by NADPH oxidases play a crucial role in ABA signaling in guard cells (Pei et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003; Sirichandra et al., 2009; Jannat et al., 2011). Nitric oxide (NO) is an essential signaling component in ABA-induced stomatal closure (Desikan et al., 2002; Guo et al., 2003; Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2007; Neill et al., 2008). Alkalization of cytosolic pH in guard cells is postulated to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and Pisum sativum and Paphiopedilum species (Irving et al., 1992; Gehring et al., 1997; Grabov and Blatt, 1997; Suhita et al., 2004; Gonugunta et al., 2008). These second messengers transduce environmental signals to ion channels and ion transporters that create the driving force for stomatal movements (Ward et al., 1995; MacRobbie, 1998; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003).In this study, we examined the mobilization of second messengers, the inactivation of I_Kin, and the suppression of H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation evoked by ABA in Arabidopsis mutants to clarify the downstream signaling events of ABA signaling in guard cells. The mutants included a quadruple mutant of PYR/PYL/RCARs, pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4, and a mutant of a SnRK2 kinase, srk2e.     

Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

Composition,Assembly, and Trafficking of a Wheat Xylan Synthase Complex

Xylans play an important role in plant cell wall integrity and have many industrial applications. Characterization of xylan synthase (XS) complexes responsible for the synthesis of these polymers is currently lacking. We recently purified XS activity from etiolated wheat (Triticum aestivum) seedlings. To further characterize this purified activity, we analyzed its protein composition and assembly. Proteomic analysis identified six main proteins: two glycosyltransferases (GTs) TaGT43-4 and TaGT47-13; two putative mutases (TaGT75-3 and TaGT75-4) and two non-GTs; a germin-like protein (TaGLP); and a vernalization related protein (TaVER2). Coexpression of TaGT43-4, TaGT47-13, TaGT75-3, and TaGT75-4 in Pichia pastoris confirmed that these proteins form a complex. Confocal microscopy showed that all these proteins interact in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) but the complexes accumulate in Golgi, and TaGT43-4 acts as a scaffold protein that holds the other proteins. Furthermore, ER export of the complexes is dependent of the interaction between TaGT43-4 and TaGT47-13. Immunogold electron microscopy data support the conclusion that complex assembly occurs at specific areas of the ER before export to the Golgi. A di-Arg motif and a long sequence motif within the transmembrane domains were found conserved at the NH₂-terminal ends of TaGT43-4 and homologous proteins from diverse taxa. These conserved motifs may control the forward trafficking of the complexes and their accumulation in the Golgi. Our findings indicate that xylan synthesis in grasses may involve a new regulatory mechanism linking complex assembly with forward trafficking and provide new insights that advance our understanding of xylan biosynthesis and regulation in plants.It is believed that Golgi-localized, multiprotein complexes synthesize plant hemicellulosic polysaccharides, including xylans. Such complexes are not well characterized in plants (Zeng et al., 2010; Atmodjo et al., 2011; Chou et al., 2012), which is in sharp contrast with mammalian and yeast cells (Jungmann and Munro, 1998; McCormick et al., 2000; Giraudo et al., 2001). Xylans are the most abundant plant hemicellulosic polysaccharides on Earth and play an important role in the integrity of cell walls, which is a key factor in plant growth. Any mutations affecting xylan backbone biosynthesis seem to result in abnormal growth of plants due mostly to thinning and weakening of secondary xylem walls, described as the irregular xylem (irx) phenotype. Thus, characterizing the xylan synthase complex (XSC) would have an impact on plant improvement, as well as many industrial applications related to food, feed, and biofuel production (Yang and Wyman, 2004; Faik, 2010). Although the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) irx mutants have revealed the involvement of several glycosyltransferase (GT) gene families in xylan biosynthesis (Brown et al., 2007, 2009; Lee et al., 2007, 2010; Wu et al., 2009, 2010), no XSCs have been purified/isolated from Arabidopsis tissues, and we still do not know whether some of the identified Arabidopsis GTs can assemble into functional XSCs. Furthermore, if GTs do assemble into XSCs, we don’t know the mechanisms by which plant cells control their assembly and cellular trafficking. In contrast to dicots, xylan synthase activity was recently immunopurified from etiolated wheat (Triticum aestivum) microsomes (Zeng et al., 2010). This purified wheat XS activity was shown to catalyze three activities, xylan-glucuronosyltransferase (XGlcAT), xylan-xylosyltransferase (XXylT), and xylan-arabinofuranosyltranferase (XAT), which work synergistically to synthesize xylan-type polymers in vitro (Zeng et al., 2008, 2010). This work focuses on describing protein composition, assembly, and trafficking of this purified wheat XS activity.In all eukaryotes, proteins of the secretory pathway (including GTs) are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and modified as they go through the Golgi cisternae. Most proteins exit the ER from ER export sites (ERESs; Hanton et al., 2009) and use a signal-based sorting mechanism that allows them to be selectively recruited into vesicles coated by coat protein II complexes (Barlowe, 2003; Beck et al., 2008). For many Golgi-resident type II membrane proteins, di-Arg motifs, such as RR, RXR, and RRR located in their cytosolic NH₂-terminal ends, have been shown to be required for their ER export (Giraudo et al., 2003; Czlapinski and Bertozzi, 2006; Schoberer et al., 2009; Tu and Banfield, 2010). Interestingly, di-Arg motifs located ∼40 amino acids from the membrane on the cytosolic side can also be used to retrieve some type II ER-resident proteins from cis-Golgi (Schutze et al., 1994; Hardt et al., 2003; Boulaflous et al., 2009). In contrast to the signal-based sorting mechanism involved in trafficking between the ER and Golgi, the steady-state localization/retention of proteins (including GTs) in the Golgi is thought to occur through vesicular cycling. Cycling is influenced by various mechanisms, including the length and composition of the transmembrane domain (TMD) of type II GTs (Bretscher and Munro, 1993; Colley, 1997; van Vliet et al., 2003; Sousa et al., 2003; Sharpe et al., 2010), and the oligomerization/aggregation of GTs (kin hypothesis), which suggests that formation of homo- or heterooligomers of GTs in the Golgi may prevent their recruitment into clathrin-coated vesicles (Machamer, 1991; Nilsson et al., 1993; Weisz et al., 1993; Cole et al., 1996). Some Golgi-resident GTs are predicted to have a cleavable NH₂-terminal secretion signal peptide (SP) and would therefore exist as soluble proteins in the Golgi lumen. To maintain their proper Golgi localization, these processed GTs are likely part of multiprotein complexes anchored to integral membrane proteins. The fact that homologs of many of the trafficking proteins from mammalian and yeast cells are found in plants indicates that trafficking machineries of the plant secretory pathway are likely conserved (d’Enfert et al., 1992; Bar-Peled and Raikhel, 1997; Batoko et al., 2000; Pimpl et al., 2000; Phillipson et al., 2001; Hawes et al., 2008).It is becoming increasingly evident that understanding the mechanisms controlling protein-protein interaction, sorting, and trafficking of polysaccharide synthases (including XSCs) will help elucidate how plants regulate cell wall synthesis and deposition during their development. To this end, we believe that the purified wheat XS activity (Zeng et al., 2010) is an excellent model for this type of study. In this work, proteomics was used to determine the protein composition of the purified XS activity. Confocal microscopy and immunogold transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to investigate the assembly and trafficking of the complex. Our proteomics data showed that the purified activity contains two GTs, TaGT43-4 and TaGT47-13, two putative mutases, TaGT75-3 and TaGT75-4, and two non-GT proteins: a germin-like protein (TaGLP) belonging to cupin superfamily and a protein specific to monocots annotated as wheat vernalization-related protein 2 (TaVER2). Microscopy analyses revealed that all these proteins interact in the ER, but the assembled complexes accumulate in the Golgi. Export of these complexes from the ER is controlled by the interaction between TaGT43-4 and TaGT47-13. Characterization of the wheat XSC and its trafficking furthers our understanding of xylan biosynthesis in grasses and helps elucidate how polysaccharide synthase complexes are assembled, sorted, and maintained in different compartments of the secretory pathway.     

Arabidopsis 3-Ketoacyl-Coenzyme A Synthase9 Is Involved in the Synthesis of Tetracosanoic Acids as Precursors of Cuticular Waxes,Suberins, Sphingolipids,and Phospholipids

Very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) with chain lengths from 20 to 34 carbons are involved in diverse biological functions such as membrane constituents, a surface barrier, and seed storage compounds. The first step in VLCFA biosynthesis is the condensation of two carbons to an acyl-coenzyme A, which is catalyzed by 3-ketoacyl-coenzyme A synthase (KCS). In this study, amino acid sequence homology and the messenger RNA expression patterns of 21 Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) KCSs were compared. The in planta role of the KCS9 gene, showing higher expression in stem epidermal peels than in stems, was further investigated. The KCS9 gene was ubiquitously expressed in various organs and tissues, including roots, leaves, and stems, including epidermis, silique walls, sepals, the upper portion of the styles, and seed coats, but not in developing embryos. The fluorescent signals of the KCS9::enhanced yellow fluorescent protein construct were merged with those of BrFAD2::monomeric red fluorescent protein, which is an endoplasmic reticulum marker in tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) epidermal cells. The kcs9 knockout mutants exhibited a significant reduction in C24 VLCFAs but an accumulation of C20 and C22 VLCFAs in the analysis of membrane and surface lipids. The mutant phenotypes were rescued by the expression of KCS9 under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Taken together, these data demonstrate that KCS9 is involved in the elongation of C22 to C24 fatty acids, which are essential precursors for the biosynthesis of cuticular waxes, aliphatic suberins, and membrane lipids, including sphingolipids and phospholipids. Finally, possible roles of unidentified KCSs are discussed by combining genetic study results and gene expression data from multiple Arabidopsis KCSs.Very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) are fatty acids of 20 or more carbons in length and are essential precursors of functionally diverse lipids, cuticular waxes, aliphatic suberins, phospholipids, sphingolipids, and seed oils in the Brassicaceae. These lipids are involved in various functions, such as acting as protective barriers between plants and the environment, impermeable barriers to water and ions, energy-storage compounds in seeds, structural components of membranes, and lipid signaling, which is involved in the hypersensitive response (Pollard et al., 2008; Kunst and Samuels, 2009; Franke et al., 2012). VLCFAs are synthesized by the microsomal fatty acid elongase complex, which catalyzes the cyclic addition of a C2 moiety obtained from malonyl-CoA to C16 or C18 acyl-CoA. The fatty acid elongation process has been shown to proceed through a series of four reactions: condensation of the C2 carbon moiety to acyl-CoA by 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A synthase (KCS), reduction of KCS by 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A reductase (KCR), dehydration of 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA by 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase (PAS2), and reduction of trans-2,3-enoyl-CoA by trans-2-enoyl-CoA reductase (ECR). Except for KCS isoforms with redundancy, disruption of KCR1, ECR/ECERIFERUM10 (CER10), or PAS2 exhibited severe morphological abnormalities and embryo lethality, suggesting that VLCFA homeostasis is essential for plant developmental processes (Zheng et al., 2005; Bach et al., 2008; Beaudoin et al., 2009).Cuticular waxes that cover plant aerial surfaces are known to be involved in limiting nonstomatal water loss and gaseous exchanges (Boyer et al., 1997; Riederer and Schreiber, 2001), repelling lipophilic pathogenic spores and dust (Barthlott and Neinhuis, 1997), and protecting plants from UV light (Reicosky and Hanover, 1978). VLCFAs that are synthesized in the epidermal cells are either directly used or further modified into aldehydes, alkanes, secondary alcohols, ketones, primary alcohols, and wax esters for the synthesis of cuticular waxes. Reverse genetic analysis and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) epidermal peel microarray analysis (Suh et al., 2005) has enabled the research community to identify the functions of many genes involved in cuticular wax biosynthesis (Kunst and Samuels, 2009): CER1 (Bourdenx et al., 2011; Bernard et al., 2012), WAX2/CER3 (Chen et al., 2003; Rowland et al., 2007; Bernard et al., 2012), and MAH1(Greer et al., 2007; Wen and Jetter, 2009) have been shown to be involved in the decarbonylation pathway to form aldehydes, alkanes, secondary alcohols, and ketones, and acyl-coenzyme A reductase (FAR; Aarts et al., 1997; Rowland et al., 2006) and WSD1 (Li et al., 2008) have been shown to be involved in the decarboxylation pathway for the synthesis of primary alcohols and wax esters. The export of wax precursors to the extracellular space is mediated by a heterodimer of the ATP-binding cassette transporters in the plasma membrane (Pighin et al., 2004; Bird et al., 2007; McFarlane et al., 2010). In addition, glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored LTP (LTPG1) and LTPG2 contribute either directly or indirectly to the export of cuticular wax (DeBono et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2012).VLCFAs that are synthesized in the endodermis of primary roots, seed coats, and the chalaza-micropyle region of seeds are used as precursors for the synthesis of aliphatic suberins. The suberin layer is known to function as a barrier against uncontrolled water, gas, and ion loss and provides protection from environmental stresses and pathogens (Pollard et al., 2008; Franke et al., 2012). For aliphatic suberin biosynthesis, the ω-carbon of the VLCFAs is oxidized by the fatty acyl ω-hydroxylase (Xiao et al., 2004; Li et al., 2007; Höfer et al., 2008; Molina et al., 2008, 2009; Compagnon et al., 2009; Li-Beisson et al., 2009), and the ω-hydroxy VLCFAs are further oxidized into α,ω-dicarboxylic acids by the HOTHEAD-like oxidoreductase (Kurdyukov et al., 2006). α,ω-Dicarboxylic acids are acylated to glycerol-3-P via acyl-CoA:glycerol-3-P acyltransferase (Beisson et al., 2007; Li et al., 2007; Li-Beisson et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2010) or to ferulic acid. In addition, C18, C20, and C22 fatty acids are also reduced by FAR enzymes to primary fatty alcohols, which are a common component in root suberin (Vioque and Kolattukudy, 1997). Finally, the aliphatic suberin precursors are likely to be extensively polymerized and cross linked with the polysaccharides or lignins in the cell wall.In addition, VLCFAs are found in sphingolipids, including glycosyl inositolphosphoceramides, glycosylceramides, and ceramides and phospholipids, such as phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidyl-Ser (PS), which are present in the extraplastidial membrane (Pata et al., 2010; Yamaoka et al., 2011). For sphingolipid biosynthesis, VLCFA-CoAs and Ser are condensed to form 3-keto-sphinganine, which is subsequently reduced to produce sphinganine, a long chain base (LCB). LCBs are known to be further modified by 4-hydroxylation, 4-desaturation, and 8-desaturation (Lynch and Dunn, 2004; Chen et al., 2006, 2012; Pata et al., 2010). The additional VLCFAs are linked with 4-hydroxy LCBs via an amino group to form ceramides (Chen et al., 2008). The presence of VLCFA in sphingolipids may contribute to an increase of their hydrophobicity, membrane leaflet interdigitation, and the transition from a fluid to a gel phase, which is required for microdomain formation. In plants, PS is synthesized from CDP-diacylglycerol and Ser by PS synthase or through an exchange reaction between a phospholipid head group and Ser by a calcium-dependent base-exchange-type PS synthase (Vincent et al., 1999; Yamaoka et al., 2011). PE biosynthesis proceeds through decarboxylation via PS decarboxylase (Nerlich et al., 2007), the phosphoethanolamine transfer from CDP-ethanolamine to diacylglycerol (Kennedy pathway), and the exchange of the head group of PE with Ser via a base-exchange enzyme (Marshall and Kates, 1973). In particular, PS containing a relatively large amount of VLCFAs is enriched in endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-derived vesicles that may function in stabilizing small (70- to 80-nm-diameter) vesicles (Vincent et al., 2001).During the fatty acid elongation process, the first committed step is the condensation of C₂ units to acyl-CoA by KCS. Arabidopsis harbors a large family containing 21 KCS members (Joubès et al., 2008). Characterization of Arabidopsis KCS mutants with defects in VLCFA synthesis revealed in planta roles and substrate specificities (based on differences in carbon chain length and degree of unsaturation) of KCSs. For example, FAE1, a seed-specific condensing enzyme, was shown to catalyze C20 and C22 VLCFA biosynthesis for seed storage lipids (James et al., 1995). KCS6/CER6/CUT1 and KCS5/CER60 are involved in the elongation of fatty acyl-CoAs longer than C28 VLCFA for cuticular waxes in epidermis and pollen coat lipids (Millar et al., 1999; Fiebig et al., 2000; Hooker et al., 2002). KCS20 and KCS2/DAISY are functionally redundant in the two-carbon elongation to C22 VLCFA, which is required for cuticular wax and root suberin biosynthesis (Franke et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2009). When KCS1 and KCS9 were expressed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), KCS1 showed broad substrate specificity for saturated and monounsaturated C16 to C24 acyl-CoAs and KCS9 utilized the C16 to C22 acyl-CoAs (Trenkamp et al., 2004; Blacklock and Jaworski, 2006; Paul et al., 2006). Recently, CER2 encoding putative BAHD acyltransferase was reported to be a fatty acid elongase that was involved in the elongation of C28 fatty acids for the synthesis of wax precursors (Haslam et al., 2012).In this study, the expression patterns and subcellular localization of KCS9 were examined, and an Arabidopsis kcs9 mutant was isolated to investigate the roles of KCS9 in planta. Diverse classes of lipids, including cuticular waxes, aliphatic suberins, and sphingolipids, as well as fatty acids in various organs were analyzed from the wild type, the kcs9 mutant, and complementation lines. The combined results of this study revealed that KCS9 is involved in the elongation of C22 to C24 fatty acids, which are essential precursors for the biosynthesis of cuticular waxes, aliphatic suberins, and membrane lipids, including sphingolipids. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study where a KCS9 isoform involved in sphingolipid biosynthesis was identified.     

Heterodimeric Capping Protein from Arabidopsis Is a Membrane-Associated,Actin-Binding Protein

The actin cytoskeleton is a major regulator of cell morphogenesis and responses to biotic and abiotic stimuli. The organization and activities of the cytoskeleton are choreographed by hundreds of accessory proteins. Many actin-binding proteins are thought to be stimulus-response regulators that bind to signaling phospholipids and change their activity upon lipid binding. Whether these proteins associate with and/or are regulated by signaling lipids in plant cells remains poorly understood. Heterodimeric capping protein (CP) is a conserved and ubiquitous regulator of actin dynamics. It binds to the barbed end of filaments with high affinity and modulates filament assembly and disassembly reactions in vitro. Direct interaction of CP with phospholipids, including phosphatidic acid, results in uncapping of filament ends in vitro. Live-cell imaging and reverse-genetic analyses of cp mutants in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) recently provided compelling support for a model in which CP activity is negatively regulated by phosphatidic acid in vivo. Here, we used complementary biochemical, subcellular fractionation, and immunofluorescence microscopy approaches to elucidate CP-membrane association. We found that CP is moderately abundant in Arabidopsis tissues and present in a microsomal membrane fraction. Sucrose density gradient separation and immunoblotting with known compartment markers were used to demonstrate that CP is enriched on membrane-bound organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. This association could facilitate cross talk between the actin cytoskeleton and a wide spectrum of essential cellular functions such as organelle motility and signal transduction.The cellular levels of membrane-associated lipids undergo dynamic changes in response to developmental and environmental stimuli. Different species of phospholipids target specific proteins and this often affects the activity and/or subcellular localization of these lipid-binding proteins. One such membrane lipid, phosphatidic acid (PA), serves as a second messenger and regulates multiple developmental processes in plants, including seedling development, root hair growth and pattern formation, pollen tube growth, leaf senescence, and fruit ripening. PA levels also change during various stress responses, including high salinity and dehydration, pathogen attack, and cold tolerance (Testerink and Munnik, 2005, 2011; Wang, 2005; Li et al., 2009). In mammalian cells, PA is critical for vesicle trafficking events, such as vesicle budding from the Golgi apparatus, vesicle transport, exocytosis, endocytosis, and vesicle fusion (Liscovitch et al., 2000; Freyberg et al., 2003; Jenkins and Frohman, 2005).The actin cytoskeleton and a plethora of actin-binding proteins (ABPs) are well-known targets and transducers of lipid signaling (Drøbak et al., 2004; Saarikangas et al., 2010; Pleskot et al., 2013). For example, several ABPs have the ability to bind phosphoinositide lipids, such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PtdIns(4,5)P₂]. The severing or actin filament depolymerizing proteins such as villin, cofilin, and profilin are inhibited when bound to PtdIns(4,5)P₂. One ABP appears to be strongly regulated by another phospholipid; human gelsolin binds to lysophosphatidic acid and its filament severing and barbed-end capping activities are inhibited by this biologically active lipid (Meerschaert et al., 1998). Gelsolin is not, however, regulated by PA (Meerschaert et al., 1998), nor are profilin (Lassing and Lindberg, 1985), α-actinin (Fraley et al., 2003), or chicken CapZ (Schafer et al., 1996).The heterodimeric capping protein (CP) from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) also binds to and its activity is inhibited by phospholipids, including both PtdIns(4,5)P₂ and PA (Huang et al., 2003, 2006). PA and phospholipase D activity have been implicated in the actin-dependent tip growth of root hairs and pollen tubes (Ohashi et al., 2003; Potocký et al., 2003; Samaj et al., 2004; Monteiro et al., 2005a; Pleskot et al., 2010). Exogenous application of PA causes an elevation of actin filament levels in suspension cells, pollen, and Arabidopsis epidermal cells (Lee et al., 2003; Potocký et al., 2003; Huang et al., 2006; Li et al., 2012; Pleskot et al., 2013). Capping protein (CP) binds to the barbed end of actin filaments with high (nanomolar) affinity, dissociates quite slowly, and prevents the addition of actin subunits at this end (Huang et al., 2003, 2006; Kim et al., 2007). In the presence of phospholipids, AtCP is not able to bind to the barbed end of actin filaments (Huang et al., 2003, 2006). Furthermore, capped filament ends are uncapped by the addition of PA, allowing actin assembly from a pool of profilin-actin (Huang et al., 2006). Collectively, these data lead to a simple model whereby CP, working in concert with profilin-actin, serves to maintain tight regulation of actin assembly at filament barbed ends (Huang et al., 2006; Blanchoin et al., 2010; Henty-Ridilla et al., 2013; Pleskot et al., 2013). Furthermore, the availability of CP for filament ends can be modulated by fluxes in signaling lipids. Genetic evidence for this model was recently obtained by analyzing the dynamic behavior of actin filament ends in living Arabidopsis epidermal cells after treatment with exogenous PA (Li et al., 2012). Specifically, changes in the architecture of cortical actin arrays and dynamics of individual actin filaments that are induced by PA treatment were found to be attenuated in cp mutant cells (Li et al., 2012; Pleskot et al., 2013).Structural characterization of chicken CapZ demonstrates that the α- and β-subunits of the heterodimer form a compact structure resembling a mushroom with pseudo-two-fold rotational symmetry (Yamashita et al., 2003). Actin- and phospholipid-binding sites are conserved on the C-terminal regions, sometimes referred to as tentacles, which comprise amphipathic α-helices (Cooper and Sept, 2008; Pleskot et al., 2012). Coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG-MD) simulations recently revealed the mechanism of chicken and AtCP association with membranes (Pleskot et al., 2012). AtCP interacts specifically with lipid bilayers through interactions between PA and the amphipathic helix of the α-subunit tentacle. Extensive polar contacts between lipid headgroups and basic residues on CP (including K278, which is unique to plant CP), as well as partial embedding of nonpolar groups into the lipid bilayer, are observed (Pleskot et al., 2012). Moreover, a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein containing the C-terminal 38 amino acids from capping protein α subunit (CPA) is sufficient to bind PA-containing liposomes in vitro (Pleskot et al., 2012). Collectively, these findings lead us to predict that AtCP will behave like a membrane-associated protein in plant cells.Additional evidence from animal and microbial cells supports the association of CP with biological membranes. In Acanthamoeba castellanii, CP is localized primarily to the hyaline ectoplasm in a region of the cytoplasm just under the plasma membrane that contains a high concentration of actin filaments (Cooper et al., 1984). Localization of CP with regions rich in actin filaments and with membranes was supported by subcellular fractionation experiments, in which CP was associated with a crude membrane fraction that included plasma membrane (Cooper et al., 1984). Further evidence demonstrates that CP localizes to cortical actin patches at sites of new cell wall growth in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), including the site of bud emergence. By contrast, CP did not colocalize with actin cables in S. cerevisiae (Amatruda and Cooper, 1992). CP may localize to these sites by direct interactions with membrane lipids, through binding the ends of actin filaments, or by association with another protein different from actin. In support of this hypothesis, GFP-CP fusion proteins demonstrate that sites of actin assembling in living cells contain both CP and the actin-related protein2/3 (Arp2/3) complex, and CP is located in two types of structures: (1) motile regions of the cell periphery, which reflect movement of the edge of the lamella during extension and ruffling; and (2) dynamic spots within the lamella (Schafer et al., 1998). CP has been colocalized to the F-actin patches in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Kovar et al., 2005), which promotes Arp2/3-dependent nucleation and branching and limits the extent of filament elongation (Akin and Mullins, 2008). These findings lend additional support for a model whereby CP cooperates with the Arp2/3 complex to regulate actin dynamics (Nakano and Mabuchi, 2006). Activities and localization of other plant ABPs are linked to membranes. Membrane association has been linked to the assembly status of the ARP2/3 complex, an actin filament nucleator, in Arabidopsis (Kotchoni et al., 2009). SPIKE1 (SPK1), a Rho of plants (Rop)-guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and peripheral membrane protein, maintains the homeostasis of the early secretory pathway and signal integration during morphogenesis through specialized domains in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; Zhang et al., 2010). Furthermore, Nck-associated protein1 (NAP1), a component of the suppressor of cAMP receptor/WASP-family verprolin homology protein (SCAR/WAVE) complex, strongly associates with membranes and is particularly enriched in ER membranes (Zhang et al., 2013a). Finally, a superfamily of plant ABPs, called NETWORKED proteins, was recently discovered; these link the actin cytoskeleton to various cellular membranes (Deeks et al., 2012; Hawkins et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014).In this work, we demonstrate that CP is a membrane-associated protein in Arabidopsis. To our knowledge, this is the first direct evidence for CP-membrane association in plants. This interaction likely targets CP to cellular compartments such as the ER and Golgi. This unique location may allow CP to remodel the actin cytoskeleton in the vicinity of endomembrane compartments and/or to respond rapidly to fluxes in signaling lipids.     

Arabidopsis Glutathione Transferases U24 and U25 Exhibit a Range of Detoxification Activities with the Environmental Pollutant and Explosive, 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene

The explosive 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) is a major worldwide military pollutant. The presence of this toxic and highly persistent pollutant, particularly at military sites and former manufacturing facilities, presents various health and environmental concerns. Due to the chemically resistant structure of TNT, it has proven to be highly recalcitrant to biodegradation in the environment. Here, we demonstrate the importance of two glutathione transferases (GSTs), GST-U24 and GST-U25, from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) that are specifically up-regulated in response to TNT exposure. To assess the role of GST-U24 and GST-U25, we purified and characterized recombinant forms of both enzymes and demonstrated the formation of three TNT glutathionyl products. Importantly, GST-U25 catalyzed the denitration of TNT to form 2-glutathionyl-4,6-dinitrotoluene, a product that is likely to be more amenable to subsequent biodegradation in the environment. Despite the presence of this biochemical detoxification pathway in plants, physiological concentrations of GST-U24 and GST-U25 result in only a limited innate ability to cope with the levels of TNT found at contaminated sites. We demonstrate that Arabidopsis plants overexpressing GST-U24 and GST-U25 exhibit significantly enhanced ability to withstand and detoxify TNT, properties that could be applied for in planta detoxification of TNT in the field. The overexpressing lines removed significantly more TNT from soil and exhibited a corresponding reduction in glutathione levels when compared with wild-type plants. However, in the absence of TNT, overexpression of these GSTs reduces root and shoot biomass, and although glutathione levels are not affected, this effect has implications for xenobiotic detoxification.The containment and cleanup of environmental pollutants is increasingly both a legal requirement and a responsible action in many developed countries. The most commonly used explosives in military weapons are 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), and their continual use, along with production and decommissioning, are progressively contaminating millions of hectares of military land (Rylott and Bruce, 2009). Bioremediation of TNT is particularly challenging, as the electron-withdrawing properties of the three nitro groups render the aromatic ring particularly resistant to oxidative attack and ring cleavage by microbial oxygenases, which in the environment are normally central to the biodegradation of aromatic compounds (Qasim et al., 2007). In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency and the military are addressing methods by which toxic TNT and RDX can be contained and detoxified on active military training ranges. One way this problem might be tackled is through the use of plants that are adapted to detoxify these compounds. This could be achieved either by traditional breeding programs or by genetic modification, as has been demonstrated previously for both RDX and TNT (Hannink et al., 2001; Rylott et al., 2006; Jackson et al., 2007).In the majority of species tested so far (tobacco [Nicotiana tabacum], bean [Phaseolus vulgaris], wheat [Triticum aestivum], poplar [Populus spp.], and switchgrass [Panicum virgatum]), with the exception of some conifer trees (Schoenmuth and Pestemer, 2004), TNT is located almost entirely in the roots (Sens et al., 1998, 1999; Hannink et al., 2007; Van Dillewijn et al., 2008; Brentner et al., 2010). Endogenous metabolism of TNT by plants has been characterized (Rylott and Bruce, 2009; Rylott et al., 2011b), with recent research focusing on the model plant species Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Hannink et al., 2001; Van Dillewijn et al., 2008; Rylott et al., 2011a). First, TNT is transformed by nitroreductases to hydroxylamino dinitrotoluenes (HADNTs), with a varying portion further reduced to amino dinitrotoluenes (ADNTs). In Arabidopsis, oxophytodienoate reductases are known to catalyze these steps (Beynon et al., 2009). Plants engineered to express bacterial nitroreductases, which also perform this transformation step, have increased TNT transformation activity and show dramatically enhanced resistance to TNT (Hannink et al., 2001; Rylott et al., 2011a). The additional functionality of HADNTs and ADNTs permits their subsequent conjugation to amino acids, organic acids, and sugars (Bhadra et al., 1999, 2001), and conjugation of HADNT and ADNT isomers to Glc by Arabidopsis glucosyltransferases has been characterized (Gandia-Herrero et al., 2008), with research suggesting that these conjugates are subsequently sequestered within the cell walls (Rylott and Bruce, 2009).Glutathione transferases (GSTs) are a multigene family of proteins known to conjugate glutathione to electrophilic molecules and, in plants, are involved in the detoxification of herbicide xenobiotics (Cummins et al., 2011). Since GSTs have evolved the ability to catalyze glutathione-linked reactions with thousands of different chemical structures, it has been hypothesized that GSTs should play a central role, alongside glucosyltransferases, in the detoxification of TNT (Mezzari et al., 2005; Brentner et al., 2008). Gene expression studies in poplar (Tanaka et al., 2007; Brentner et al., 2008) and Arabidopsis (Ekman et al., 2003; Mezzari et al., 2005; Gandia-Herrero et al., 2008) have identified GSTs up-regulated in response to TNT; however, to date, the biochemical response of GSTs toward TNT has not been investigated. The overexpression of plant GSTs has been shown to increase resistance to a range of stresses, with some τ class GSTs shown to detoxify herbicides via a conjugation activity (Dixon and Edwards, 2010; Cummins et al., 2011). Many Arabidopsis GSTs (in common with some mammalian and other plant GSTs) exhibit a glutathione-dependent peroxide (GPOX) activity (Dixon and Edwards, 2010), catalyzing the reduction of lipid hydroperoxides to the respective monohydroxyalcohols, an activity that confers tolerance to a number of oxidative stresses (Dixon et al., 1998; Dixon and Edwards, 2010). Here, we expressed, purified, and characterized TNT-responsive Arabidopsis GSTs and investigated their contribution toward the detoxification of TNT in Arabidopsis.     

The Rubisco Small Subunit Is Involved in Tobamovirus Movement and Tm-22-Mediated Extreme Resistance

The multifunctional movement protein (MP) of Tomato mosaic tobamovirus (ToMV) is involved in viral cell-to-cell movement, symptom development, and resistance gene recognition. However, it remains to be elucidated how ToMV MP plays such diverse roles in plants. Here, we show that ToMV MP interacts with the Rubisco small subunit (RbCS) of Nicotiana benthamiana in vitro and in vivo. In susceptible N. benthamiana plants, silencing of NbRbCS enabled ToMV to induce necrosis in inoculated leaves, thus enhancing virus local infectivity. However, the development of systemic viral symptoms was delayed. In transgenic N. benthamiana plants harboring Tobacco mosaic virus resistance-2² (Tm-2²), which mediates extreme resistance to ToMV, silencing of NbRbCS compromised Tm-2²-dependent resistance. ToMV was able to establish efficient local infection but was not able to move systemically. These findings suggest that NbRbCS plays a vital role in tobamovirus movement and plant antiviral defenses.Plant viruses use at least one movement protein (MP) to facilitate viral spread between plant cells via plasmodesmata (PD; Lucas and Gilbertson, 1994; Ghoshroy et al., 1997). Among viral MPs, the MP of tobamoviruses, such as Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and its close relative Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV), is the best characterized. TMV MP specifically accumulates in PD and modifies the plasmodesmatal size exclusion limit in mature source leaves or tissues (Wolf et al., 1989; Deom et al., 1990; Ding et al., 1992). TMV MP and viral genomic RNA form a mobile ribonucleoprotein complex that is essential for cell-to-cell movement of viral infection (Watanabe et al., 1984; Deom et al., 1987; Citovsky et al., 1990, 1992; Kiselyova et al., 2001; Kawakami et al., 2004; Waigmann et al., 2007). TMV MP also enhances intercellular RNA silencing (Vogler et al., 2008) and affects viral symptom development, host range, and host susceptibility to virus (Dardick et al., 2000; Bazzini et al., 2007). Furthermore, ToMV MP is identified as an avirulence factor that is recognized by tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) resistance proteins Tobacco mosaic virus resistance-2 (Tm-2) and Tm-2² (Meshi et al., 1989; Lanfermeijer et al., 2004). Indeed, tomato Tm-2² confers extreme resistance against TMV and ToMV in tomato plants and even in heterologous tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants (Lanfermeijer et al., 2003, 2004).To date, several host factors that interact with TMV MP have been identified. These TMV MP-binding host factors include cell wall-associated proteins such as pectin methylesterase (Chen et al., 2000), calreticulin (Meshi et al., 1989), ANK1 (Ueki et al., 2010), and the cellular DnaJ-like protein MPIP1 (Shimizu et al., 2009). Many cytoskeletal components such as actin filaments (McLean et al., 1995), microtubules (Heinlein et al., 1995), and the microtubule-associated proteins MPB2C (Kragler et al., 2003) and EB1a (Brandner et al., 2008) also interact with TMV MP. Most of these factors are involved in TMV cell-to-cell movement.Rubisco catalyzes the first step of CO₂ assimilation in photosynthesis and photorespiration. The Rubisco holoenzyme is a heteropolymer consisting of eight large subunits (RbCLs) and eight small subunits (RbCSs). RbCL was reported to interact with the coat protein of Potato virus Y (Feki et al., 2005). Both RbCS and RbCL were reported to interact with the P3 proteins encoded by several potyviruses, including Shallot yellow stripe virus, Onion yellow dwarf virus, Soybean mosaic virus, and Turnip mosaic virus (Lin et al., 2011). Proteomic analysis of the plant-virus interactome revealed that RbCS participates in the formation of virus complexes of Rice yellow mottle virus (Brizard et al., 2006). However, the biological function of Rubisco in viral infection remains unknown.In this study, we show that RbCS plays an essential role in virus movement, host susceptibility, and Tm-2²-mediated extreme resistance in the ToMV-host plant interaction.