Collective inhibition of pRB family proteins by phosphorylation in cells with p16INK4a loss or cyclin E overexpression

The activity of the retinoblastoma protein pRB is regulated by phosphorylation that is mediated by G(1) cyclin-associated cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). Since the pRB-related pocket proteins p107 and p130 share general structures and biological functions with pRB, their activity is also considered to be regulated by phosphorylation. In this work, we generated phosphorylation-resistant p107 and p130 molecules by replacing potential cyclin-CDK phosphorylation sites with non-phosphorylatable alanine residues. These phosphorylation-resistant mutants retained the ability to bind E2F and cyclin. Upon introduction into p16(INK4a)-deficient U2-OS osteosarcoma cells, in which cyclin D-CDK4/6 is dysregulated, the phosphorylation-resistant mutants, but not wild-type p107 or p130, were capable of inhibiting cell proliferation. Furthermore, when ectopically expressed in pRB-deficient SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells, the wild-type as well as the phosphorylation-resistant pRB family proteins were capable of inducing large flat cells. The flat cell-inducing activity of the wild-type proteins, but not that of the phosphorylation-resistant mutants, was abolished by coexpressing cyclin E. Our results indicate that the elevated cyclin D- or cyclin E-associated kinase leads to systemic inactivation of the pRB family proteins and suggest that dysregulation of the pRB kinase provokes an aberrant cell cycle in a broader range of cell types than those induced by genetic inactivation of the RB gene.     

The J Domain of Simian Virus 40 Large T Antigen Is Required To Functionally Inactivate RB Family Proteins

Transformation by simian virus 40 large T antigen (TAg) is dependent on the inactivation of cellular tumor suppressors. Transformation minimally requires the following three domains: (i) a C-terminal domain that mediates binding to p53; (ii) the LXCXE domain (residues 103 to 107), necessary for binding to the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein, pRB, and the related p107 and p130; and (iii) an N-terminal domain that is homologous to the J domain of DnaJ molecular chaperone proteins. We have previously demonstrated that the N-terminal J domain of TAg affects the RB-related proteins by perturbing the phosphorylation status of p107 and p130 and promoting the degradation of p130 and that this domain is required for transformation of cells that express either p107 or p130. In this work, we demonstrate that the J domain of TAg is required to inactivate the ability of each member of the pRB family to induce a G₁ arrest in Saos-2 cells. Furthermore, the J domain is required to override the repression of E2F activity mediated by p130 and pRB and to disrupt p130-E2F DNA binding complexes. These results imply that while the LXCXE domain serves as a binding site for the RB-related proteins, the J domain plays an important role in inactivating their function.     

Human cytomegalovirus pp71 stimulates cell cycle progression by inducing the proteasome-dependent degradation of the retinoblastoma family of tumor suppressors

The oncoproteins of the DNA tumor viruses, adenovirus E1A, simian virus 40 T antigen, and papillomavirus E7, each interact with the retinoblastoma family of tumor suppressors, leading to cell cycle stimulation, apoptosis induction, and cellular transformation. These proteins utilize a conserved LXCXE motif, which is also found in cellular proteins, to target the retinoblastoma family. Here, we describe a herpesvirus protein that shares a subset of the properties of the DNA tumor virus oncoproteins but maintains important differences as well. The human cytomegalovirus pp71 protein employs an LXCXD motif to attack the retinoblastoma family members and induce DNA synthesis in quiescent cells. pp71 binds to and induces the degradation of the hypophosphorylated forms of the retinoblastoma protein and its family members p107 and p130 in a proteasome-dependent manner. However, pp71 does not induce apoptosis and fails to transform cells. Thus, the similarities and differences in comparison to E1A, T antigen, and E7 make pp71 an interesting new tool with which to further dissect the role of the retinoblastoma/E2F pathway in cellular growth control and carcinogenesis.     

G1 cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase-coordinated phosphorylation of endogenous pocket proteins differentially regulates their interactions with E2F4 and E2F1 and gene expression

Mitogenic stimulation leads to activation of G(1) cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which phosphorylate pocket proteins and trigger progression through the G(0)/G(1) and G(1)/S transitions of the cell cycle. However, the individual role of G(1) cyclin-CDK complexes in the coordinated regulation of pocket proteins and their interaction with E2F family members is not fully understood. Here we report that individually or in concert cyclin D1-CDK and cyclin E-CDK complexes induce distinct and coordinated phosphorylation of endogenous pocket proteins, which also has distinct consequences in the regulation of pocket protein interactions with E2F4 and the expression of p107 and E2F1, both E2F-regulated genes. The up-regulation of these two proteins and the release of p130 and pRB from E2F4 complexes allows formation of E2F1 complexes not only with pRB but also with p130 and p107 as well as the formation of p107-E2F4 complexes. The formation of these complexes occurs in the presence of active cyclin D1-CDK and cyclin E-CDK complexes, indicating that whereas phosphorylation plays a role in the abrogation of certain pocket protein/E2F interactions, these same activities induce the formation of other complexes in the context of a cell expressing endogenous levels of pocket and E2F proteins. Of note, phosphorylated p130 "form 3," which does not interact with E2F4, readily interacts with E2F1. Our data also demonstrate that ectopic overexpression of either cyclin is sufficient to induce mitogen-independent growth in human T98G and Rat-1 cells, although the effects of cyclin D1 require downstream activation of cyclin E-CDK2 activity. Interestingly, in T98G cells, cyclin D1 induces cell cycle progression more potently than cyclin E. This suggests that cyclin D1 activates pathways independently of cyclin E that ensure timely progression through the cell cycle.