Evaluation of Recombinant Influenza Virus-Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Vaccines in Macaques

There is an urgent need for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccines that induce robust mucosal immunity. Influenza A viruses (both H1N1 and H3N2) were engineered to express simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) CD8 T-cell epitopes and evaluated following administration to the respiratory tracts of 11 pigtail macaques. Influenza virus was readily detected from respiratory tract secretions, although the infections were asymptomatic. Animals seroconverted to influenza virus and generated CD8 and CD4 T-cell responses to influenza virus proteins. SIV-specific CD8 T-cell responses bearing the mucosal homing marker β7 integrin were induced by vaccination of naïve animals. Further, SIV-specific CD8 T-cell responses could be boosted by recombinant influenza virus-SIV vaccination of animals with already-established SIV infection. Sequential vaccination with influenza virus-SIV recombinants of different subtypes (H1N1 followed by H3N2 or vice versa) produced only a limited boost in immunity, probably reflecting T-cell immunity to conserved internal proteins of influenza A virus. SIV challenge of macaques vaccinated with an influenza virus expressing a single SIV CD8 T cell resulted in a large anamnestic recall CD8 T-cell response, but immune escape rapidly ensued and there was no impact on chronic SIV viremia. Although our results suggest that influenza virus-HIV vaccines hold promise for the induction of mucosal immunity to HIV, broader antigen cover will be needed to limit cytotoxic T-lymphocyte escape.Developing a safe and effective human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine is one of the defining scientific challenges of our time. Induction of peripheral CD8 T-cell immunity to HIV did not protect against sexual exposure to HIV type 1 (HIV-1) in humans in a recent efficacy trial (11, 43). In simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-macaque studies, peripheral CD8 T-cell immunity can effectively control viremia (40) but is often observed to have a transient or limited role in delaying SIV disease in macaques (32). The gradual accumulation of immune escape at CD8 T-cell epitopes undermines the effectiveness of CD8 T-cell immunity to SIV (6, 22, 46). It is likely that inducing mucosal CD8 T-cell immunity to HIV will be more effective at limiting viral replication during the very early phases of acute infection, prior to massive viral dissemination and destruction of large numbers of CD4 T cells (50). The induction of multifunctional mucosal CD8 T cells by live attenuated SIV vaccination of macaques is thought to play a significant role in the success of this strategy (25, 26); however, it is unfortunately too dangerous for clinical trials at present.A series of mucosal viral and bacterial HIV vaccine vectors have been studied in recent years; however, none have yet proceeded to advanced clinical trials. Live attenuated poliovirus vectors have shown promise in SIV studies, but these viruses can in rare cases revert to virulence (14). Salmonella-based SIV vaccine vectors are able to induce CD8 T-cell responses which express the α4β7 integrin mucosal homing marker when administered orally (20, 24). However, there may be a much stronger link between concomitant genital tract immunity and immunity induced at respiratory mucosal sites compared to that induced at enteric sites (33, 38, 42). Vesicular stomatitis virus vectors that replicate in the nasal mucosa show promise in SIV-macaque trials but are potentially neurotoxic (55). Replication-competent adenovirus vectors have looked promising in some SHIV-macaque studies (49) but failed to provide significant protection in a recent SIV-macaque study (17) and could have similar issues of enhanced infection rates as seen in the recent efficacy trials of replication-incompetent adenovirus type 5 vectors.A mucosal vector system that has several advantages over existing models but that is relatively unexplored is recombinant attenuated influenza viruses. Such viruses (i) have an existing reverse genetics system to readily generate and manipulate recombinant viruses (31, 34), (ii) are effective as anti-influenza vaccines and licensed for human use (e.g., “Flumist” vaccine [9]) with ready production capability, (iii) have robust respiratory mucosal replication that should facilitate genital mucosal immunity, and (iv) can be generated with a variety of hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N) glycoproteins, potentially enabling these viruses to be administered sequentially in prime-boost combinations to limit the effect of antivector humoral immunity (34). Mouse-adapted recombinant influenza virus-HIV vectors have been studied in mice and demonstrated significant induction of cellular immunity at mucosal sites (8, 27, 28, 44, 48). However, although several native influenza viruses replicate efficiently in the respiratory tracts of Asian macaque species (10, 12, 52), no studies to date have examined the immunogenicity or efficacy of recombinant attenuated influenza virus-SIV vectors in macaques.     

Vaccine protection by live, attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus in the absence of high-titer antibody responses and high-frequency cellular immune responses measurable in the periphery

An attenuated derivative of simian immunodeficiency virus strain 239 deleted of V1-V2 sequences in the envelope gene (SIV239ΔV1-V2) was used for vaccine/challenge experiments in rhesus monkeys. Peak levels of viral RNA in plasma of 10⁴ to 10^6.5 copies/ml in the weeks immediately following inoculation of SIV239ΔV1-V2 were 10- to 1,000-fold lower than those observed with parental SIV239 (∼10^7.3 copies/ml). Viral loads consistently remained below 200 copies/ml after 8 weeks of infection by the attenuated SIV239ΔV1-V2 strain. Viral localization experiments revealed large numbers of infected cells within organized lymphoid nodules of the colonic gut-associated lymphoid tissue at 14 days; double-labeling experiments indicated that 93.5% of the virally infected cells at this site were positive for the macrophage marker CD68. Cellular and humoral immune responses measured principally by gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunospot and neutralization assays were variable in the five vaccinated monkeys. One monkey had responses in these assays comparable to or only slightly less than those observed in monkeys infected with parental, wild-type SIV239. Four of the vaccinated monkeys, however, had low, marginal, or undetectable responses in these same assays. These five vaccinated monkeys and three naïve control monkeys were subsequently challenged intravenously with wild-type SIV239. Three of the five vaccinated monkeys, including the one with strong anti-SIV immune responses, were strongly protected against the challenge on the basis of viral load measurements. Surprisingly, two of the vaccinated monkeys were strongly protected against SIV239 challenge despite the presence of cellular anti-SIV responses of low-frequency and low-titer anti-SIV antibody responses. These results indicate that high-titer anti-SIV antibody responses and high-frequency anti-SIV cellular immune responses measurable by standard assays from the peripheral blood are not needed to achieve strong vaccine protection, even against a difficult, neutralization-resistant strain such as SIV239.The characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection suggest major difficulty for the development of a preventive vaccine (19, 23). Pessimism regarding the prospects for a vaccine is derived at least in part from the ability of HIV-1 to continually replicate in the face of apparently strong host immune responses, resistance to antibody-mediated neutralization, and the extensive sequence diversity in field strains of the virus. Lack of knowledge regarding the key components of a protective immune response also remains a major scientific obstacle. Vaccine/challenge experiments with macaque monkeys have been used to evaluate the properties and relative effectiveness of different vaccine approaches and to gauge the formidable nature of these difficulties.One lesson that has been learned from vaccine/challenge experiments with macaque monkeys is the importance of challenge strain on outcome. Vaccinated monkeys that have been challenged with strains of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) with an HIV-1 envelope (SHIV) have almost invariably exhibited strong, long-term protection against disease, irrespective of the nature of the vaccine. Even peptide immunogens have protected against SHIV-induced disease (6, 12, 38). Vaccine approaches that have protected against SHIV challenge include DNA (5, 13), recombinant poxvirus (4), recombinant adenovirus (57), other viral recombinants (18, 55), prime and boost protocols (3, 53, 65), and purified protein (10, 64). Vaccine protection against pathogenic SIV strains such as SIV239, SIV251, and SIV-E660 has been much more difficult to achieve (2, 11, 27, 63). The identical replication-defective gag-recombinant adenovirus that provided strong protection against SHIV challenge (57) provided little or no protection against SIV239 challenge (11). Disappointing levels of protection against SIV have often been observed in the face of apparently robust vaccine-induced immune responses (see, for example, Vogel et al. [63] and Casimiro et al. [11]). Some partial vaccine protections against these SIV strains have been achieved by recombinant poxvirus (7, 50), replication-competent recombinant adenovirus (51), replication-defective adenovirus (66), recombinant poliovirus (15), recombinant Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (18), and recombinant Sendai virus (44).Differences between the biological properties of the SIV strains and those of the SHIV strains used for the above-mentioned studies provide clues as to what may be responsible for the differences in outcome. These SIV strains are difficult to neutralize (26, 34), use CCR5 as a coreceptor for entry into cells (21, 52), and induce a chronic, progressive disease course (17), and this course is independent of the infectious dose (17). The SHIV strains used for the above-mentioned studies are easier to neutralize, use CXCR4 for entry, and induce an acute decline in CD4 counts, and the disease course is dose dependent (29, 30, 48, 54). These SIV strains, like HIV-1 in humans, exhibit a marked preference for CD4⁺ CCR5⁺ memory cells, in contrast to the acutely pathogenic SHIV strains which principally target naïve cells (48).Live, attenuated strains of SIV have provided the strongest vaccine protection by far against SIV challenge. Although clinical use of a live, attenuated HIV vaccine is not being considered, understanding the basis of the strong protection afforded by live, attenuated SIV strains remains an important research objective for the insights that can be provided. Most of the attenuated SIV strains that have been used lack a functional nef gene (16, 31, 58, 67). Shacklett et al. (56) used an attenuated SIV strain with modifications in the gp41 transmembrane protein for protection. Here, we describe strong vaccine protection by a replication-competent SIV strain lacking 100 amino acids from the essential gp120 envelope protein in the absence of overtly robust immune responses.     

Polyfunctional CD4+ T-Cell Induction in Neutralizing Antibody-Triggered Control of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

Rapid depletion of memory CD4⁺ T cells and delayed induction of neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses are characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infections. Although it was speculated that postinfection NAb induction could have only a limited suppressive effect on primary HIV replication, a recent study has shown that a single passive NAb immunization of rhesus macaques 1 week after SIV challenge can result in reduction of viral loads at the set point, indicating a possible contribution of postinfection NAb responses to virus control. However, the mechanism accounting for this NAb-triggered SIV control has remained unclear. Here, we report rapid induction of virus-specific polyfunctional T-cell responses after the passive NAb immunization postinfection. Analysis of SIV Gag-specific responses of gamma interferon, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-2, macrophage inflammatory protein 1β, and CD107a revealed that the polyfunctionality of Gag-specific CD4⁺ T cells, as defined by the multiplicity of these responses, was markedly elevated in the acute phase in NAb-immunized animals. In the chronic phase, despite the absence of detectable NAbs, virus control was maintained, accompanied by polyfunctional Gag-specific T-cell responses. These results implicate virus-specific polyfunctional CD4⁺ T-cell responses in this NAb-triggered virus control, suggesting possible synergism between NAbs and T cells for control of HIV/SIV replication.Virus-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell responses are crucial for the control of pathogenic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infections (5, 6, 20, 23, 30, 39, 40). However, CD4⁺ T cells, especially CCR5⁺ memory CD4⁺ T cells, are themselves targets for these viruses, which may be an obstacle to potent virus-specific CD4⁺ T-cell induction (10, 47, 52). Indeed, HIV-1/SIV infection causes rapid, massive depletion of memory CD4⁺ T cells (26, 31), and host immune responses fail to contain viral replication and allow persistent chronic infection, although virus-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses exert suppressive pressure on viral replication (15).Recently, the importance of T-cell quality in virus containment has been high-lighted, and T-cell polyfunctionality, which is defined by their multiplicity of antigen-specific cytokine production, has been analyzed as an indicator of T-cell quality (4, 8, 11, 41). However, there has been no evidence indicating an association of polyfunctional T-cell responses in the acute phase with HIV-1/SIV control. Even in the chronic phase, whether polyfunctional CD4⁺ T-cell responses may be associated with virus control has been unclear, although an inverse correlation between polyfunctional CD8⁺ T-cell responses and viral loads has been shown in HIV-1-infected individuals (4).Another characteristic of HIV-1/SIV infections is the absence of potent neutralizing antibody (NAb) induction during the acute phase (7). This is mainly due to the unusually neutralization-resistant nature of the virus, such as masking of target epitopes in viral envelope proteins (24). Whether this lack of effective NAb response contributes to the failure to control the virus, and whether NAb induction in the acute phase can contribute to virus control, remains unclear. Previous studies documenting virus escape from NAb recognition suggested that NAbs can also exert selective pressure on viral replication to a certain extent (38, 45, 49), but it was speculated that postinfection NAb induction could have only a limited suppressive effect on primary HIV-1/SIV replication (34, 37).By passive NAb immunization of rhesus macaques after SIV challenge, we recently provided evidence indicating that the presence of NAbs during the acute phase can result in SIV control (50). In that study, passive NAb immunization 1 week after SIVmac239 challenge resulted in transient detectable NAb responses followed by reduction in set point viral loads compared to unimmunized macaques. However, the mechanism of this virus control has remained unclear. In the present study, we found rapid appearance of polyfunctional Gag-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses after such passive NAb immunization postinfection. These animals maintained virus control for more than 1 year in the absence of detectable plasma NAbs, which was accompanied by potent Gag-specific T-cell responses. These results implicate virus-specific polyfunctional CD4⁺ T-cell responses in this NAb-triggered primary and long-term SIV control.     

Effect of B-Cell Depletion on Viral Replication and Clinical Outcome of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in a Natural Host

Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected African nonhuman primates do not progress to AIDS in spite of high and persistent viral loads (VLs). Some authors consider the high viral replication observed in chronic natural SIV infections to be due to lower anti-SIV antibody titers than those in rhesus macaques, suggesting a role of antibodies in controlling viral replication. We therefore investigated the impact of antibody responses on the outcome of acute and chronic SIVagm replication in African green monkeys (AGMs). Nine AGMs were infected with SIVagm.sab. Four AGMs were infused with 50 mg/kg of body weight anti-CD20 (rituximab; a gift from Genentech) every 21 days, starting from day −7 postinfection up to 184 days. The remaining AGMs were used as controls and received SIVagm only. Rituximab-treated AGMs were successfully depleted of CD20 cells in peripheral blood, lymph nodes (LNs), and intestine, as shown by the dynamics of CD20⁺ and CD79a⁺ cells. There was no significant difference in VLs between CD20-depleted AGMs and control monkeys: peak VLs ranged from 10⁷ to 10⁸ copies/ml; set-point values were 10⁴ to 10⁵ SIV RNA copies/ml. Levels of acute mucosal CD4⁺ T-cell depletion were similar for treated and nontreated animals. SIVagm seroconversion was delayed for the CD20-depleted AGMs compared to results for the controls. There was a significant difference in both the timing and magnitude of neutralizing antibody responses for CD20-depleted AGMs compared to results for controls. CD20 depletion significantly altered the histological structure of the germinal centers in the LNs and Peyer''s patches. Our results, although obtained with a limited number of animals, suggest that humoral immune responses play only a minor role in the control of SIV viral replication during acute and chronic SIV infection in natural hosts.In marked contrast to pathogenic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infections of humans and macaques, which are characterized by the constant progression to AIDS in a variable time frame (26), African monkey species naturally infected with SIV are generally spared from any signs of disease (reviewed in references 53 and 71).There are currently three animal models of SIV infection in natural hosts: SIVagm infection of African green monkeys (AGMs), SIVsmm infection of sooty mangabeys, and SIVmnd-1 and SIVmnd-2 infection of mandrills (53, 71). SIV infection in natural hosts is characterized by the following: (i) active viral replication, with set-point viral loads (VLs) similar to or even higher than those found in pathogenic infections (44-46, 49, 50, 52, 61-63); (ii) transient depletion of peripheral CD4⁺ T cells during primary infection, which rebound to preinfection levels during chronic infection (12, 30, 44-46, 49, 62); (iii) significant CD4⁺ T-cell depletion in the intestine, which can be partially restored during chronic infection in spite of significant viral replication (21, 48); (iv) low levels of CD4⁺ CCR5⁺ cells in blood and tissues (47); (v) transient and moderate increases in immune activation and T-cell proliferation during acute infection, with a return to baseline levels during the chronic phase (44-46, 49, 50, 52, 61-63), as a result of an anti-inflammatory milieu which is rapidly established after infection (14, 30); and (vi) no significant increase in CD4⁺ T-cell apoptosis during either acute or chronic infection (37, 48), thus avoiding enteropathy and microbial translocation, which control excessive immune activation and prevent disease progression by allowing CD4⁺ T-cell recovery in the presence of high VLs (21, 48). Hence, the current view is that the main reason behind the lack of disease progression in natural African hosts lies in a better adaptation of the host in response to the highly replicating virus. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the lack of disease in natural hosts for SIV infection may provide important clues for understanding the pathogenesis of HIV infection (53, 71).To date, it is still unknown whether or not immune responses are responsible for the lack of disease progression in natural hosts, since data are scarce. Studies of cellular immune responses are significantly more limited than is the case with pathogenic infection, and although not always in agreement (3, 13, 28, 29, 73, 76), their convergence point is that cellular immune responses are not essentially superior to those observed in pathogenic infections (3, 13, 28, 29, 73, 76). This observation is not surprising in the context of the high viral replication in natural hosts. Data are even scarcer on the role of humoral immune responses in the control of disease progression in natural hosts. However, several studies reported that anti-SIV antibody titers are lower in SIV infections of natural hosts, with a lack of anti-Gag responses being characteristic of natural SIV infections in African nonhuman primates (1, 6, 24, 25, 42, 43, 71). Because the viral replication in SIVagm-infected AGMs is of the same magnitude or higher than that in pathogenic infections of rhesus macaques (RMs), it has been hypothesized that these high VLs may be a consequence of the lower antibody titers. Moreover, a recent study has also shown that B cells in lymph nodes (LNs) of AGMs are activated at an earlier time point than is the case for SIVmac251-infected RMs, which implies that humoral immune responses may be important in controlling SIV replication in the natural hosts (9). Conversely, it has been shown that passively transferring immunoglobulins from animals naturally infected with SIVagm prior to infection with a low dose of SIVagm did not prevent infection in AGMs (42, 60), which is in striking contrast to results in studies of pathogenic infections, which convincingly demonstrated with animal models that intravenously administered or topically applied antibodies can protect macaques against intravenous or mucosal simian-human immunodeficiency virus challenge (34-36, 54, 72).Previous CD20⁺ B-cell-depletion studies during pathogenic RM infections have indicated that humoral immune responses may be important for controlling both the postpeak VL and disease progression (38, 57). However, these studies used strains that are highly resistant to neutralization (SIVmac251 and SIVmac239), making it difficult to assess the role that antibodies have in controlling SIV replication and disease progression. Moreover, our recent results suggested a limited impact of humoral immune responses in controlling replication of a neutralization-sensitive SIVsmm strain in rhesus macaques (18).To investigate the effect that CD20⁺ B cells and antibodies have on SIV replication in natural hosts, we have depleted CD20⁺ B cells in vivo in AGMs infected with SIVagm.sab92018. We assessed the impact of humoral immune responses on the control of viral replication and other immunological parameters, and we report that ablating humoral immune responses in SIVagm-infected AGMs does not significantly alter the course of virus replication or disease progression.     

Envelope Vaccination Shapes Viral Envelope Evolution following Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Rhesus Monkeys

The evolution of envelope mutations by replicating primate immunodeficiency viruses allows these viruses to escape from the immune pressure mediated by neutralizing antibodies. Vaccine-induced anti-envelope antibody responses may accelerate and/or alter the specificity of the antibodies, thus shaping the evolution of envelope mutations in the replicating virus. To explore this possibility, we studied the neutralizing antibody response and the envelope sequences in rhesus monkeys vaccinated with either gag-pol-nef immunogens or gag-pol-nef immunogens in combination with env and then infected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). Using a pseudovirion neutralization assay, we demonstrate that envelope vaccination primed for an accelerated neutralizing antibody response following virus challenge. To monitor viral envelope evolution in these two cohorts of monkeys, full-length envelopes from plasma virus isolated at weeks 37 and 62 postchallenge were sequenced by single genome amplification to identify sites of envelope mutations. We show that env vaccination was associated with a change in the pattern of envelope mutations. Prevalent mutations in sequences from gag-pol-nef vaccinees included deletions in both variable regions 1 and 4 (V1 and V4), whereas deletions in the env vaccinees occurred only in V1. These data show that env vaccination altered the focus of the antibody-mediated selection pressure on the evolution of envelope following SIV challenge.Immune containment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) is complicated by the continuous genetic evolution of the virus. The evolution of the HIV-1 envelope is shaped, in part, by selective pressure of neutralizing antibodies (6, 12, 27, 34-36, 40). Changes in envelope sequence and glycosylation patterns following infection can allow the virus to escape neutralization. If the rate and extent of envelope sequence evolution following infection can be decreased, immune containment of HIV-1 may be improved.One possible strategy for modifying envelope evolution is vaccination prior to infection. A vaccine-elicited memory immune response could focus and potentiate the humoral immune response that develops following infection. The possible consequence of vaccination has not been assessed, however, because of the limited number of human volunteers who have received highly immunogenic envelope immunogens and subsequently became infected with HIV-1.Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection of rhesus monkeys provides a powerful model to study the effect of vaccination on envelope evolution. Like HIV-1, SIV employs both the CD4 molecule and the chemokine receptor CCR5 to enter a target cell and cause an AIDS-like disease in macaques (16, 22). Both SIV and HIV-1 envelopes are heavily glycosylated, with approximately 50% of their mass derived from carbohydrates (14, 21). SIV and HIV-1 envelopes share approximately 40% amino acid homology (10, 11) and have overlapping variable and constant regions, although the variable region 3 (V3) of HIV-1 envelope does not align with the homologous region of SIV envelope (7). Following SIV infection in rhesus monkeys, SIV envelope evolves most rapidly in variable regions 1 and 4 (V1 and V4, respectively), leading to nucleotide additions, deletions, and/or mutations that can potentially translate to changes in glycosylation (7, 9, 13, 15, 19, 29, 30).Studies done to characterize SIV neutralization suggest that it occurs through mechanisms similar to those seen in HIV-1 neutralization. Amino acid mutations in the envelope of both viruses contribute to the evasion of antibody binding directly by changing recognition sequences and/or envelope conformation. In addition, the glycosylation of envelope serves as a further obstacle to antibody recognition (20, 33, 40). Considerable effort has been devoted to defining neutralizing epitopes of the HIV and SIV envelopes. The known neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies elicited during natural infection are directed against HIV-1 envelope target sites on both gp120 and gp41, including the V3 region, the CD4 binding site, oligomannose residues of gp120, and gp41 (17, 31). The neutralizing epitope profile of SIV envelope includes the CD4 binding site and gp41 but not the V3 region. There is conflicting evidence as to whether V1, V2, and/or V4 of SIV are targets for antibody neutralization (15, 18, 19). The present study addresses whether vaccine-induced immune responses accelerate the generation of autologous neutralizing antibodies following SIV challenge in rhesus monkeys and how this humoral immune response can potentially shape viral sequence evolution.     

Vaccine-Induced Cellular Responses Control Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Replication after Heterologous Challenge

All human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine efficacy trials to date have ended in failure. Structural features of the Env glycoprotein and its enormous variability have frustrated efforts to induce broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies. To explore the extent to which vaccine-induced cellular immune responses, in the absence of neutralizing antibodies, can control replication of a heterologous, mucosal viral challenge, we vaccinated eight macaques with a DNA/Ad5 regimen expressing all of the proteins of SIVmac239 except Env. Vaccinees mounted high-frequency T-cell responses against 11 to 34 epitopes. We challenged the vaccinees and eight naïve animals with the heterologous biological isolate SIVsmE660, using a regimen intended to mimic typical HIV exposures resulting in infection. Viral loads in the vaccinees were significantly less at both the peak (1.9-log reduction; P < 0.03) and at the set point (2.6-log reduction; P < 0.006) than those in control naïve animals. Five of eight vaccinated macaques controlled acute peak viral replication to less than 80,000 viral RNA (vRNA) copy eq/ml and to less than 100 vRNA copy eq/ml in the chronic phase. Our results demonstrate that broad vaccine-induced cellular immune responses can effectively control replication of a pathogenic, heterologous AIDS virus, suggesting that T-cell-based vaccines may have greater potential than previously appreciated.It has been impossible thus far for vaccines to engender broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (12, 54). Investigators have therefore focused their attention on T-cell-based vaccines (9, 18, 26, 30, 34, 39, 48, 55). Previous preclinical studies in nonhuman primates have shown that vaccine-induced T-cell responses can partially control replication of homologous challenge viruses in the chronic phase (34, 56). Unfortunately, however, simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) loads exceeded 1 million copies in almost every vaccinated animal during the acute phase. Given the high levels of viral replication observed in these vaccinated macaques, it is possible that such T-cell-based vaccines might not be able to reduce transmission during the acute phase of infection in humans. These high levels of replication during the acute phase likely resulted in the generation of diverse viral quasispecies, providing the substrate for immune selection and eventual escape. Furthermore, in these studies, vaccinated animals were challenged with viruses that were similar to the SIV sequences in the vaccine constructs. Given the diversity of HIV, human vaccinees will never be exposed to viruses with a comparable level of sequence similarity to the vaccine constructs.An HIV-1 vaccine that induced T-cell responses exclusively has recently failed to show efficacy against the incidence of HIV infection and viremia in clinical testing. The STEP trial of a recombinant adenovirus 5 (Ad5)-vectored vaccine designed to induce HIV-specific T-cell responses in humans was widely seen as an important test of the T-cell vaccine concept (http://www.hvtn.org/media/pr/step111307.html) (11, 42). The lack of vaccine efficacy in the STEP trial has led some to conclude that T-cell-based vaccines may not be a viable approach to solving the AIDS epidemic (6, 49, 59). However, STEP trial vaccinees that became infected recognized a median of only five epitopes, mostly in the conserved proteins Gag and Pol. Given the sequence diversity of HIV (19), several of these vaccine-elicited T-cell responses may not have recognized epitopes in the infecting virus and, therefore, not constituted an adequate test of the T-cell vaccine concept.We therefore sought to test whether high-frequency vaccine-induced T-cell responses against multiple T-cell epitopes in one of the simian AIDS viruses, SIVmac239, could effectively impact viral replication after a physiologically relevant heterologous mucosal challenge with SIVsmE660. The majority of virus challenges in macaques have been carried out with high doses of homologous viruses. We used a repeated low-dose mucosal challenge with a heterologous SIV strain. We also used a challenge dose intended to mimic HIV mucosal exposures that lead to infection. Here we show that vaccine-induced T-cell responses can reduce heterologous virus replication during both the acute and chronic phases after a relevant viral challenge.     

Macaques Vaccinated with Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVmac239Δnef Delay Acquisition and Control Replication after Repeated Low-Dose Heterologous SIV Challenge

An effective human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine will likely need to reduce mucosal transmission and, if infection occurs, control virus replication. To determine whether our best simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) vaccine can achieve these lofty goals, we vaccinated eight Indian rhesus macaques with SIVmac239Δnef and challenged them intrarectally (i.r.) with repeated low doses of the pathogenic heterologous swarm isolate SIVsmE660. We detected a significant reduction in acquisition of SIVsmE660 in comparison to that for naïve controls (log rank test; P = 0.023). After 10 mucosal challenges, we detected replication of the challenge strain in only five of the eight vaccinated animals. In contrast, seven of the eight control animals became infected with SIVsmE660 after these 10 challenges. Additionally, the SIVsmE660-infected vaccinated animals controlled peak acute virus replication significantly better than did the naïve controls (Mann-Whitney U test; P = 0.038). Four of the five SIVsmE660 vaccinees rapidly brought virus replication under control by week 4 postinfection. Unfortunately, two of these four vaccinated animals lost control of virus replication during the chronic phase of infection. Bulk sequence analysis of the circulating viruses in these animals indicated that recombination had occurred between the vaccine and challenge strains and likely contributed to the increased virus replication in these animals. Overall, our results suggest that a well-designed HIV vaccine might both reduce the rate of acquisition and control viral replication.The goals of any human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine are both to prevent infection and, if infection occurs, to control virus replication. If vaccinated individuals who become infected are able to reduce virus replication to extremely low or undetectable levels, they will live longer, healthier lives and will be less likely to transmit the virus to others (7, 16, 41). An HIV vaccine that successfully meets these two goals will therefore have a significant impact on slowing the spread of HIV (3).Live-attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) vaccines have proven to be universally effective at protecting macaques against homologous virus challenges, regardless of the route of transmission (10, 21, 33, 36, 50, 51). For this reason, live-attenuated SIV vaccines are considered the “gold standard” of protection in the SIV/rhesus macaque model of HIV infection (25). Previously, we and others showed that SIVmac239Δnef-vaccinated animals can reduce plasma virus replication after intravenous (i.v.) inoculation with the uncloned heterologous swarm virus SIVsmE660 (43, 50). This vaccine-induced effect was most pronounced, particularly during acute infection, in animals expressing major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I alleles (Mamu-A*01, -B*08, and -B*17) previously associated with control of pathogenic SIVmac239 replication (29, 38, 43, 52, 54). Despite these encouraging results for this subset of animals, and in contrast to previous studies using homologous virus challenges, most of the vaccinated animals failed to maintain control of virus replication of the challenge strain during the chronic phase of infection.There are several potential explanations for why SIVmac239Δnef vaccination was not as effective against i.v. exposure to the heterologous challenge virus (1, 43, 50). First, sequence variation between the vaccine and infecting strains may have rendered the vaccine-induced immune responses ineffective at controlling chronic-phase virus replication. Second, unlike the case in homologous SIVmac239 challenge studies using cloned viral stocks, the heterologous SIVsmE660 isolate contains many quasispecies within the inoculum (23, 49). Third, the heterologous challenges were administered i.v., thereby bypassing any potentially protective vaccine-induced immune responses at mucosal surfaces. All of the SIVsmE660 quasispecies in the inoculum therefore had the potential to infect cells and to establish a reservoir of viral diversity. This broad spectrum of viral diversity may have contributed to the decreased efficacy of SIVmac239Δnef-induced immune responses in protecting against heterologous virus replication after a high-dose i.v. challenge.Since a large i.v. dose of multiple quasispecies of heterologous virus might overwhelm any potentially protective vaccine-induced immune responses, we tested the possibility that SIVmac239Δnef vaccination may be more efficacious against a more physiologically relevant low-dose challenge. In the SIV/rhesus macaque model of HIV infection, repeated low doses of pathogenic SIV more accurately reflect human sexual transmission than a single high-dose i.v. challenge does (32). Keele et al. recently established that one to three virus strains typically cross mucosal barriers to establish HIV infections (22). We and others observed similar results using repeated-dose mucosal challenge of macaques (23, 49). This model therefore facilitates the testing of vaccines in a more physiologically relevant manner.     

gp340 Promotes Transcytosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Genital Tract-Derived Cell Lines and Primary Endocervical Tissue

The human scavenger receptor gp340 has been identified as a binding protein for the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope that is expressed on the cell surface of female genital tract epithelial cells. This interaction allows such epithelial cells to efficiently transmit infective virus to susceptible targets and maintain viral infectivity for several days. Within the context of vaginal transmission, HIV must first traverse a normally protective mucosa containing a cell barrier to reach the underlying T cells and dendritic cells, which propagate and spread the infection. The mechanism by which HIV-1 can bypass an otherwise healthy cellular barrier remains an important area of study. Here, we demonstrate that genital tract-derived cell lines and primary human endocervical tissue can support direct transcytosis of cell-free virus from the apical to basolateral surfaces. Further, this transport of virus can be blocked through the addition of antibodies or peptides that directly block the interaction of gp340 with the HIV-1 envelope, if added prior to viral pulsing on the apical side of the cell or tissue barrier. Our data support a role for the previously described heparan sulfate moieties in mediating this transcytosis but add gp340 as an important facilitator of HIV-1 transcytosis across genital tract tissue. This study demonstrates that HIV-1 actively traverses the protective barriers of the human genital tract and presents a second mechanism whereby gp340 can promote heterosexual transmission.Through correlative studies with macaques challenged with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), the initial targets of infection in nontraumatic vaginal exposure to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) have been identified as subepithelial T cells and dendritic cells (DCs) (18, 23, 31, 36-38). While human transmission may differ from macaque transmission, the existing models of human transmission remain controversial. For the virus to successfully reach its CD4⁺ targets, HIV must first traverse the columnar mucosal epithelial cell barrier of the endocervix or uterus or the stratified squamous barrier of the vagina or ectocervix, whose normal functions include protection of underlying tissue from pathogens. This portion of the human innate immune defense system represents a significant impediment to transmission. Studies have placed the natural transmission rate of HIV per sexual act between 0.005 and 0.3% (17, 45). Breaks in the epithelial barrier caused by secondary infection with other sexual transmitted diseases or the normal physical trauma often associated with vaginal intercourse represent one potential means for viral exposure to submucosal cells and have been shown to significantly increase transmission (reviewed in reference 11). However, studies of nontraumatic exposure to SIV in macaques demonstrate that these disruptions are not necessary for successful transmission to healthy females. This disparity indicates that multiple mechanisms by which HIV-1 can pass through mucosal epithelium might exist in vivo. Identifying these mechanisms represents an important obstacle to understanding and ultimately preventing HIV transmission.Several host cellular receptors, including DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing integrin, galactosyl ceramide, mannose receptor, langerin, heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, have been identified that facilitate disease progression through binding of HIV virions without being required for fusion and infection (2, 3, 12, 14, 16, 25, 29, 30, 43, 46, 50). These host accessory proteins act predominately through glycosylation-based interactions between HIV envelope (Env) and the host cellular receptors. These different host accessory factors can lead to increased infectivity in cis and trans or can serve to concentrate and expose virus at sites relevant to furthering its spread within the body. The direct transcytosis of cell-free virus through primary genital epithelial cells and the human endometrial carcinoma cell line HEC1A has been described (7, 9); this is, in part, mediated by HSPGs (7). Within the HSPG family, the syndecans have been previously shown to facilitate trans infection of HIV in vitro through binding of a specific region of Env that is moderately conserved (7, 8). This report also demonstrates that while HSPGs mediate a portion of the viral transcytosis that occurs in these two cell types, a significant portion of the observed transport occurs through an HSPG-independent mechanism. Other host cell factors likely provide alternatives to HSPGs for HIV-1 to use in subverting the mucosal epithelial barrier.gp340 is a member of the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich (SRCR) family of innate immune receptors. Its numerous splice variants can be found as a secreted component of human saliva (34, 41, 42) and as a membrane-associated receptor in a large number of epithelial cell lineages (22, 32, 40). Its normal cellular function includes immune surveillance of bacteria (4-6, 44), interaction with influenza A virus (19, 20, 32, 51) and surfactant proteins in the lung (20, 22, 33), and facilitating epithelial cell regeneration at sites of cellular inflammation and damage (27, 32). The secreted form of gp340, salivary agglutinin (SAG), was identified as a component of saliva that inhibits HIV-1 transmission in the oral pharynx through a specific interaction with the viral envelope protein that serves to agglutinate the virus and target it for degradation (34, 35, 41). Interestingly, SAG was demonstrated to form a direct protein-protein interaction with HIV Env (53, 54). Later, a cell surface-associated variant of SAG called gp340 was characterized as a binding partner for HIV-1 in the female genital tract that could facilitate virus transmission to susceptible targets of infection (47) and as a macrophage-expressed enhancer of infection (10).     

Multiple Vaccine-Elicited Nonneutralizing Antienvelope Antibody Activities Contribute to Protective Efficacy by Reducing both Acute and Chronic Viremia following Simian/Human Immunodeficiency Virus SHIV89.6P Challenge in Rhesus Macaques

We have shown that following priming with replicating adenovirus type 5 host range mutant (Ad5hr)-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) recombinants, boosting with gp140 envelope protein enhances acute-phase protection against intravenous simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)_89.6P challenge compared to results with priming and no boosting or boosting with an HIV polypeptide representing the CD4 binding site of gp120. We retrospectively analyzed antibodies in sera and rectal secretions from these same macaques, investigating the hypothesis that vaccine-elicited nonneutralizing antibodies contributed to the better protection. Compared to other immunized groups or controls, the gp140-boosted group exhibited significantly greater antibody activities mediating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated viral inhibition (ADCVI) in sera and transcytosis inhibition in rectal secretions. ADCC and ADCVI activities were directly correlated with antibody avidity, suggesting the importance of antibody maturation for functionality. Both ADCVI and percent ADCC killing prechallenge were significantly correlated with reduced acute viremia. The latter, as well as postchallenge ADCVI and ADCC, was also significantly correlated with reduced chronic viremia. We have previously demonstrated induction by the prime/boost regimen of mucosal antibodies that inhibit transcytosis of SIV across an intact epithelial cell layer. Here, antibody in rectal secretions was significantly correlated with transcytosis inhibition. Importantly, the transcytosis specific activity (percent inhibition/total secretory IgA and IgG) was strongly correlated with reduced chronic viremia, suggesting that mucosal antibody may help control cell-to-cell viral spread during the course of infection. Overall, the replicating Ad5hr-HIV/SIV priming/gp140 protein boosting approach elicited strong systemic and mucosal antibodies with multiple functional activities associated with control of both acute and chronic viremia.A major goal of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine development is the elicitation of protective antibodies capable of neutralizing the diversity of isolates in the worldwide pandemic (6, 61). Indeed, passively administered neutralizing antibodies have been shown to protect against pathogenic HIV/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) challenge in rhesus macaque models (4, 44, 45, 57). However, the extent to which other antibody-mediated protective mechanisms impact HIV/SIV infection is still unclear. Whether these alternate biologic activities would augment vaccine-induced protection has not been definitively established.In HIV-infected individuals, as in SIV- or simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)-infected rhesus macaques, systemic nonneutralizing antibodies appear early during acute infection, often preceding a neutralizing antibody response (21, 55). Although neutralizing antibody activity is critical for sterilizing immunity, recent studies suggest that antibodies may contribute to protection by other functional activities, such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) (20, 29), antibody-dependent cell-mediated viral inhibition (ADCVI) (22, 23), and transcytosis inhibition (19, 35, 59). Antibodies in secretions may directly block viral entry into intestinal and endocervical tissues by inhibiting transcytosis across epithelium, whereas local or serum-derived antibodies that mediate ADCC or ADCVI may exert protective effects by eliminating small foci of infected cells during the brief window of time that exists between transmission of virus across an epithelial cell barrier to the lamina propria and subsequent systemic spread (32). In support of this notion, mutation of the Fc portion of the broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody, IgGb12, thereby preventing interaction with the FcγR on effector cells, rendered the antibody less able to mediate protection upon subsequent passive transfer and challenge of rhesus macaques (34). Thus, neutralizing antibodies themselves may mediate protection by additional functional activities.ADCC bridges innate and adaptive immunity. Mechanistically, it involves FcγR-bearing effector cells, such as NK cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and γδ T cells, and antibodies specific for antigens expressed on the surface of target cells. Upon interaction of these three components, the target cells are killed. Since the effector cells are not major histocompatibility complex restricted, ADCC is broadly applicable to diverse populations. Because the antibody specificity need not be restricted to neutralizing epitopes, ADCC may increase the breadth of antibody reactivity. In fact, we have shown that an HIV clade B immunization regimen elicited antibodies that mediated ADCC across several HIV clades (28). Antibodies that mediate ADCC have been shown to arise early in infection, before neutralizing antibodies (55, 60). They are present in the majority of infected individuals, and they have been associated with slow disease progression following both HIV and SIV infection (5, 8).ADCVI is closely related to ADCC, also requiring antibody that forms a bridge between an infected target cell and an FcγR-bearing effector cell (24). However, ADCVI is a broader activity not restricted solely to target cell lysis but, rather, encompassing several mechanisms by which viral replication following infection of target cells is inhibited. Thus, it may include ADCC activity but also involve noncytotoxic mechanisms of virus control, such as the secretion of inhibitory chemokines or FcγR-mediated phagocytosis of immune complexes (24, 25).Most HIV infections occur via a mucosal route, including cervicovaginal and rectal tissues (39, 52). Several nonmutually exclusive mechanisms for HIV-1 transmission across mucosal epithelia have been proposed (13, 56). Transcytosis of infectious virus across polarized columnar epithelial cells following contact of virally infected cells with apical epithelial cell surfaces is one mechanism for mucosal HIV entry (12). Rather than fusion and infection, interactions between the viral envelope proteins and epithelial surface molecules, such as glycosphingolipid galactosyl-ceramide (GalCer) (13, 47), an important component of endocytotic “raft” membrane microdomains, lead to transcytosis of the virus across the epithelial barrier and its trapping by submucosal dendritic cells which disseminate it to their target CD4⁺ T cells. Studies have shown that mucosal immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody, a major component of the mucosal immune response, could block mucosal HIV-1 entry via transcytosis in vitro (2, 19). Therefore, mucosal antibodies blocking adherence of virus to epithelial cells and preventing HIV-1 transcytosis across the epithelial barrier and subsequent CD4⁺ T cell infection may afford additional protection against HIV/SIV infection.We have been pursuing a replicating adenovirus (Ad)-HIV/SIV prime/protein subunit boost AIDS vaccine approach (30, 51), which has elicited strong, durable protection against HIV, SIV, and SHIV challenges (11, 18, 41, 42, 50). An underlying goal of these studies has been elucidation of immune responses that correlate with protective efficacy. Recently, we studied the contribution of novel protein boosts to immunogenicity and protective efficacy in a SHIV_89.6P model (49). Immunized rhesus macaques were primed with Ad type 5 host range mutant (Ad5hr)-HIV_89.6Pgp140, -SIV₂₃₉gag, and -SIV₂₃₉nef recombinants. One group was not boosted, one was boosted with HIV_89.6P gp140ΔCFI protein (gp140 envelope with deletions in the cleavage site, fusion peptide, and part of the interspace between the two heptad repeats) (40), and one was boosted with a novel HIV-1 polypeptide “peptomer” representing the CD4 binding site of the envelope (54). The best protection was seen in the gp140-boosted group, with significant reductions in both acute and chronic viremia. Although Env-specific antibody and cellular responses were readily detected, none directly correlated with the better protection. Furthermore, neutralizing antibodies against SHIV_89.6P did not develop until 4 weeks postchallenge. Therefore, we hypothesized that vaccine-elicited nonneutralizing anti-Env antibodies might have contributed to the better control of acute and/or chronic viremia in the gp140 group. Here, we report retrospective evaluations of sera and rectal secretions from macaques in this comparative study for serum binding antibody avidity, an important characteristic of functional antibodies (38, 58), and nonneutralizing activities of systemic and mucosal antibodies, including ADCC, ADCVI, and transcytosis inhibition.     

Delivery of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Vaccine Vectors to the Intestine Induces Enhanced Mucosal Cellular Immunity

Effective vaccines for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) will likely need to stimulate protective immunity in the intestinal mucosa, where HIV-1 infection causes severe CD4⁺ T-cell depletion. While replication-competent recombinant adenovirus (rAd) vectors can stimulate adenovirus-specific mucosal immunity after replication, oral delivery of replication-defective rAd vectors encoding specific immunogens has proven challenging. In this study, we have systematically identified barriers to effective gut delivery of rAd vectors and identified sites and strategies to induce potent cellular and humoral immunity. Vector-mediated gene transfer by rAd5 was susceptible to low-pH buffer, gastric and pancreatic proteases, and extracellular mucins. Using ex vivo organ explants, we found that transduction with rAd5 was highest in the ileum and colon among all intestinal segments. Transgene expression was 100-fold higher after direct surgical introduction into the ileum than after oral gavage, with rAd5 showing greater potency than the rAd35 or the rAd41 vector. A single immunization of rAd5 encoding HIV-1 gp140B to the ileum stimulated potent CD8⁺ T-cell responses in the intestinal and systemic compartments, and these responses were further enhanced by intramuscular rAd5 boosting. These studies suggest that induction of primary immune responses by rAd5 gut immunization and subsequent systemic boosting elicits potent antigen-specific gut mucosal responses.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is characterized by uncontrolled virus replication and cytopathicity in the intestinal mucosa, the site of major T-cell depletion after primary infection. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the predominant site of a pronounced CD4⁺ T-cell loss in the early stages of HIV infection and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection in the nonhuman primate model (3, 23, 26, 43). It has been suggested that a mucosal vaccine which generates HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in the gut could prevent the loss of CD4⁺ cells in gut-associated lymphoid tissue, establishment of infection, or spread of virus (13, 34). Therefore, targeted delivery of vaccines to the GI tract to stimulate mucosal responses has the potential to improve the efficacy of immune protection against HIV-1; however, the site of gene-based transduction and the barriers to vaccine delivery have not been well defined.Adenoviruses (Ads) have been used extensively as vectors for both gene transfer and vaccine development. They offer several advantages as tools for vaccine delivery, such as the ability to transduce both dividing and nondividing cells, relative safety and stability in vivo, ease of production in high titers, and lack of integration (2, 35). These vectors are promising because parenteral administration in both animals and humans has been shown to generate strong and long-lasting humoral and cellular immune responses. The immune responses surpass those achieved with other types of gene vectors and genetic vaccines (5, 38, 46). As a result, recombinant Ad (rAd) vectors have been developed and tested as vaccine vehicles to immunize against a number of pathogens (4, 10, 15, 18, 41).Orally (p.o.) delivered vaccines are attractive in theory because of their ease of administration and potential to deliver antigen to gut-associated lymphoid tissue, permitting induction of immune responses in both mucosal and systemic compartments. At the same time, p.o. delivery of replication-defective rAd vectors has posed a challenge and has met with variable levels of success. Immunization with rAd5 encoding rabies virus antigens, influenza virus antigens, or other antigens has generated some protection against infection in animal models (9, 27, 31, 39, 41), but p.o. immunization has elicited much lower CD8⁺ T-cell responses than systemic delivery (33), and a much higher dose is required to induce immune responses (37). We have recently shown in an HIV vaccine model that rAd41, a human enteric Ad-based vector, induced potent CD8⁺ T-cell responses in both systemic and mucosal compartments when primed p.o. or in the ileum (17). The previous study showed that rAd41 vectors delivered through direct ileal injection elicited mucosal cell immunity, but whether other rAd vectors could stimulate these responses and which factors affected delivery and immunogenicity were unknown. In this report, we have investigated the mechanisms associated with the low immunogenicity of rAd5 dosed through the p.o. route in mice. The purpose was to identify barriers to effective delivery of rAd vectors to gut tissues and to ascertain sites and strategies for induction of potent cellular and humoral immunity. To investigate the mechanism of the low immunogenicity of rAd vectors through the p.o. route and develop effective delivery of rAd5 and rare serotype rAd35 vectors as gut mucosal HIV vaccines, we have analyzed the obstacles to p.o. immunization, characterized vector transgene expression, and systematically compared immune responses induced by p.o. and local immunization strategies. These studies demonstrated that the higher immune responses were strongly associated with higher gene expression in the intestine and support further study of gut mucosal immunization in SIV challenge models as a potential HIV vaccine strategy.     

Balancing Reversion of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte and Neutralizing Antibody Escape Mutations within Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Env upon Transmission

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope protein (Env) is subject to both neutralizing antibody (NAb) and CD8 T-cell (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte [CTL]) immune pressure. We studied the reversion of the Env CTL escape mutant virus to the wild type and the relationship between the reversion of CTL mutations with N-linked glycosylation site (NLGS)-driven NAb escape in pigtailed macaques. Env CTL mutations either did not revert to the wild type or only transiently reverted 5 to 7 weeks after infection. The CTL escape mutant reversion was coincident, for the same viral clones, with the loss of NLGS mutations. At one site studied, both CTL and NLGS mutations were needed to confer NAb escape. We conclude that CTL and NAb escape within Env can be tightly linked, suggesting opportunities to induce effective multicomponent anti-Env immunity.CD8 T-cell responses against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have long been observed to select for viral variants that avoid cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) recognition (2, 5, 15, 18, 27). These immune escape mutations may, however, result in reduced replication competence (“fitness cost”) (11, 20, 26). CTL escape variants have been shown to revert to the wild type (WT) upon passage to major histocompatibility complex-mismatched hosts, both in macaques with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) or chimeric SIV/HIV (SHIV) infection (11, 12) and in humans with HIV type 1 (HIV-1) infection (1, 19).Most analyses of CTL escape and reversion have studied Gag CTL epitopes known to facilitate control of viremia (7, 14, 21, 30). Fewer analyses have studied Env-specific CTL epitopes. Recent sequencing studies suggest the potential for mutations within predicted HIV-1 Env-specific CTL epitopes to undergo reversion to the WT (16, 23). Env-specific CTL responses may, however, have less impact on viral control of both HIV-1 and SIV/SHIV than do Gag CTL responses (17, 24, 25), presumably reflecting either less-potent inhibition of viral replication or minimal fitness cost of escape (9).Serial viral escape from antibody pressure also occurs in both macaques and humans (3, 13, 28). Env is extensively glycosylated, and this “evolving glycan shield” can sterically block antibody binding without mutation at the antibody-binding site (8, 16, 31). Mutations at glycosylation sites, as well as other mutations, are associated with escape from neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses (4, 13, 29). Mutations in the amino acid sequences of N-linked glycosylation sites (NLGS) can alter the packing of the glycan cloud that surrounds the virion, by a loss, gain, or shift of an NLGS (32), thus facilitating NAb escape.Env is the only viral protein targeted by both CTL and NAb responses. The serial viral escape from both Env-specific CTL and NAb responses could have implications for viral fitness and the reversion of multiple mutations upon transmission to naïve hosts.We previously identified three common HIV-1 Env-specific CD8 T cell epitopes, RY8_788-795, SP9_110-118, and NL9_671-679, and their immune escape patterns in pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina) infected with SHIV_mn229 (25). SHIV_mn229 is a chimeric virus constructed from an SIV_mac239 backbone and an HIV-1_HXB2 env fragment that was passaged through macaques to become pathogenic (11). This earlier work provided an opportunity for detailed studies of how viruses with Env-specific CTL escape mutations, as well as mutations in adjacent NLGS, evolve when transmitted to naïve pigtail macaques.     

Derivation and Characterization of a Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVmac239 Variant with Tropism for CXCR4

Like human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), most simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) strains use CCR5 to establish infection. However, while HIV-1 can acquire the ability to use CXCR4, SIVs that utilize CXCR4 have rarely been reported. To explore possible barriers against SIV coreceptor switching, we derived an R5X4 variant, termed 239-ST1, from the R5 clone SIVmac239 by serially passaging virus in CD4⁺ CXCR4⁺ CCR5⁻ SupT1 cells. A 239-ST1 env clone, designated 239-ST1.2-32, used CXCR4 and CCR5 in cell-cell fusion and reporter virus infection assays and conferred the ability for rapid, cytopathic infection of SupT1 cells to SIVmac239. Viral replication was inhibitable by the CXCR4-specific antagonist AMD3100, and replication was abrogated in a novel CXCR4⁻ SupT1 line. Surprisingly, parental SIVmac239 exhibited low-level replication in SupT1 cells that was not observed in CXCR4⁻ SupT1 cells. Only two mutations in the 239-ST1.2-32 Env, K47E in the C1 domain and L328W in the V3 loop, were required for CXCR4 use in cell-cell fusion assays, although two other V3 changes, N316K and I324M, improved CXCR4 use in infection assays. An Env cytoplasmic tail truncation, acquired during propagation of 239-ST1 in SupT1 cells, was not required. Compared with SIVmac239, 239-ST1.2-32 was more sensitive to neutralization by five of seven serum and plasma samples from SIVmac239-infected rhesus macaques and was approximately 50-fold more sensitive to soluble CD4. Thus, SIVmac239 can acquire the ability to use CXCR4 with high efficiency, but the changes required for this phenotype may be distinct from those for HIV-1 CXCR4 use. This finding, along with the increased neutralization sensitivity of this CXCR4-using SIV, suggests a mechanism that could select strongly against this phenotype in vivo.Simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIVs) share many structural and biological features with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), including target cell entry via interactions of the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env) with CD4 and a chemokine coreceptor. For HIV, the most important coreceptors in vivo are CCR5 (2, 13, 19, 21, 22) and CXCR4 (30). HIV type 1 (HIV-1) strains that use only CCR5 (R5 viruses) predominate during the early stages of infection and are critical for transmission (84, 90), as evidenced by the finding that individuals lacking a functional CCR5 protein due to a homozygous 32-bp deletion in the CCR5 gene (ccr5-Δ32) are largely resistant to HIV-1 infection (16, 54, 82). Although R5 viruses generally persist in late-stage disease, viruses that can use CXCR4, either exclusively (X4 viruses) or in addition to CCR5 (R5X4 viruses), emerge in approximately 50% of subtype B-infected individuals (15, 43). This coreceptor switch is associated with a more rapid decline in peripheral blood CD4⁺ T cells and a faster progression to AIDS (15, 43, 77), although it is unclear if CXCR4-using viruses are a cause or a consequence of progressing immunodeficiency. Like HIV, the vast majority of SIVs use CCR5 to establish infection (11, 12, 45). However, although CXCR4-using SIVs have been reported (47, 52, 65, 68, 69), their occurrence is rare, especially in models of pathogenic infection, where only one CXCR4-using SIV has been identified (17, 60, 71).This paucity of CXCR4-using SIVs is surprising for several reasons. First, SIV Envs tend to be more promiscuous than HIV-1 Envs and frequently use alternative coreceptors in addition to CCR5, including GPR1, GPR15, CXCR6, and CCR8 (20, 27, 29, 80, 81, 92) but not CXCR4. Second, HIV-2, which is more closely related to SIVmac than to HIV-1 (56, 57), commonly uses CXCR4 in vitro and in vivo (3, 28, 33, 58, 59, 67). Third, rhesus CXCR4 is ∼98% identical to human CXCR4 in amino acid sequence and can function as a coreceptor for HIV-1 in vitro (12). Finally, chimeric simian-human immunodeficiency viruses (SHIVs) that contain X4 HIV Envs on an SIV core can replicate to high levels in vivo and cause disease in rhesus macaques (39, 86). Moreover, it was recently shown that coreceptor switching can occur in rhesus macaques infected with an R5 SHIV (35). Thus, there does not appear to be any block per se against the use of rhesus CXCR4 as an entry coreceptor either in vitro or in vivo, suggesting that SIV is less capable of adapting to use CXCR4 and/or that mutations required for CXCR4 utilization may lead to a virus that is less fit and/or more susceptible to immune control in this host.For HIV-1, the Env determinants for CXCR4 use have been well documented and often involve the acquisition of positively charged amino acids in the V3 loop (18, 32, 87), particularly at positions 11, 24, and 25 (6, 18, 31, 32, 38, 75). Although the SIVmac239 V3 loop is a critical determinant for Env-coreceptor interactions (44, 63, 72), attempts to create an X4 SIVmac239 by introducing positively charged residues into the V3 loop (63) or by inserting a V3 loop from X4 HIV-1 (44) have been unsuccessful. SIVmac155T3, the only CXCR4-using variant of SIVmac that has been identified to date, was isolated from a rhesus macaque with advanced disease and contains additional positively charged residues in V3, although the determinants for CXCR4 use have not been determined (60, 71).Given questions concerning the possible determinants for and/or barriers to coreceptor switching in SIV, we sought to derive a CXCR4-using variant of the well-characterized pathogenic R5 SIV clone SIVmac239. Here we show that SIVmac239 could indeed acquire CXCR4 utilization when it was adapted in vitro for high-efficiency replication in the CXCR4⁺ CCR5⁻ human SupT1 cell line. An env clone from this virus could use CXCR4 in cell-cell fusion and reporter virus infection assays and conferred CXCR4 tropism to a replication-competent SIV. Although V3 mutations were important for CXCR4 use, an L328W change at the V3 crown rather than the acquisition of positively charged residues was required, as was an unusual K47E mutation in the conserved C1 domain of gp120. These changes also caused the highly neutralization-resistant SIVmac239 strain to become more neutralization sensitive to sera and plasmas from SIVmac239-infected animals, and particularly to soluble CD4. These results indicate that mutations distinct from those typically seen for HIV-1 may be required for SIVmac to gain CXCR4 utilization and suggest that these changes render this virus more susceptible to humoral immune control. Collectively, our findings indicate that there are likely to be strong viral and host selection pressures against CXCR4 use that may contribute to the paucity of X4 coreceptor switching for SIVmac in vivo.     

Elastase-Dependent Live Attenuated Swine Influenza A Viruses Are Immunogenic and Confer Protection against Swine Influenza A Virus Infection in Pigs

Influenza A viruses cause significant morbidity in swine, resulting in a substantial economic burden. Swine influenza virus (SIV) infection also poses important human public health concerns. Vaccination is the primary method for the prevention of influenza virus infection. Previously, we generated two elastase-dependent mutant SIVs derived from A/Sw/Saskatchewan/18789/02(H1N1): A/Sw/Sk-R345V (R345V) and A/Sw/Sk-R345A (R345A). These two viruses are highly attenuated in pigs, making them good candidates for a live-virus vaccine. In this study, the immunogenicity and the ability of these candidates to protect against SIV infection were evaluated in pigs. We report that intratracheally administrated R345V and R345A induced antigen-specific humoral and cell-mediated immunity characterized by increased production of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies in the serum and in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, high hemagglutination inhibition titers in serum, an enhanced level of lymphocyte proliferation, and higher numbers of gamma interferon-secreting cells at the site of infection. Based on the immunogenicity results, the R345V virus was further tested in a protection trial in which pigs were vaccinated twice with R345V and then challenged with homologous A/Sw/Saskatchewan/18789/02, H1N1 antigenic variant A/Sw/Indiana/1726/88 or heterologous subtypic H3N2 A/Sw/Texas/4199-2/9/98. Our data showed that two vaccinations with R345V provided pigs with complete protection from homologous H1N1 SIV infection and partial protection from heterologous subtypic H3N2 SIV infection. This protection was characterized by significantly reduced macroscopic and microscopic lung lesions, lower virus titers from the respiratory tract, and lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Thus, elastase-dependent SIV mutants can be used as live-virus vaccines against swine influenza in pigs.Swine influenza virus (SIV) is the causative pathogen of swine influenza, a highly contagious, acute respiratory viral disease of swine. The mortality of SIV-infected pigs is usually low, although morbidity may approach 100%. Swine influenza is characterized by sudden onset, coughing, respiratory distress, weight loss, fever, nasal discharge, and rapid recovery (38). SIV is a member of the influenza virus A genus in the Orthomyxoviridae family, and the virus has a genome consisting of eight segments of negative-sense single-stranded RNA (29). Epithelial cells in the swine respiratory tract have receptors for both avian and mammalian influenza viruses (13); thus, pigs could potentially serve as “mixing vessels” for the generation of new reassortant strains of influenza A virus that have pandemic capacity. There are a number of reports in which the direct transmission of influenza viruses from pigs to humans has been documented (6, 12, 52), and several of these cases have resulted in human fatalities (19, 35, 40, 53). Consequently, effective control of SIV would be beneficial to both humans and animals.Until 1998, classical H1N1 SIVs were the predominant isolates from pigs in the United States and Canada (5, 28). In 1997 to 1998, a dramatic change in the epidemiologic pattern of SIV began. Serological studies conducted by Olsen and colleagues in 1997 to 1998 detected a significant increase in H3-seropositive individuals, and H3N2 SIVs were isolated from pigs in both the United States and Canada (17, 54). Furthermore, reassortment between H3N2 viruses and classical H1N1 SIV resulted in the appearance of H1N2 reassortant viruses (14, 15). In addition to the isolation of H4N6 viruses, which are of duck origin, in pigs in Canada (16), wholly avian viruses of the H3N3 and H1N1 subtypes have also been isolated from Canadian pigs (18). In general, three major SIV subtypes exist, i.e., H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2, each of which has multiple genetic and antigenic variants circulating in North American swine populations (18, 28). The increased incidence of avian-like or human-like SIV reassortants raises concerns for public health and requires research devoted to the development of cross-protective SIV vaccines.Currently available swine influenza vaccines are based on inactivated whole virus of the H1N1 and H3N2 subtypes. Application of these vaccines reduces the severity of disease but does not provide consistent protection from infection (3, 22). In contrast to killed vaccines that are administered intramuscularly, intranasally administered live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV) induce an immune response at the site of natural infection. Therefore, an LAIV has the potential to induce broad humoral and cellular immune responses that could provide protection against antigenically different influenza viruses. LAIV based on attenuation of the virus by cold adaptation are available for humans (2) and horses (41). However, to date, no SIV LAIV are commercially available for use in swine in North America. Recent studies by Solorzano et al. showed that a mutant SIV with a truncated NS1 protein was highly attenuated in pigs (36). In addition, this SIV/NS1 LAIV was capable of stimulating a protective immune response against homologous SIVs and a partial protection against heterologous subtypic wild-type (WT) SIVs (31, 50). Stech and colleagues demonstrated that the conversion of a conserved cleavage site in the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) protein from a trypsin-sensitive site to an elastase-sensitive site results in in vivo attenuation of the influenza virus in mouse models (9, 37). Furthermore, these elastase-dependent LAIV were able to induce protective systemic and mucosal immune responses. Recently, we showed that two elastase-dependent SIVs derived from A/Sw/Saskatchewan/18789/02 (SIV/Sk02), R345V and R345A, are attenuated in their natural host, pigs (23). In the current study, we addressed the immunogenic and cross-protective abilities of these mutants.