Physical interaction of Delta1, Jagged1, and Jagged2 with Notch1 and Notch3 receptors

The Delta/Serrate/LAG-2 (DSL) domain-containing proteins, Delta1, Jagged1, and Jagged2, are considered to be ligands for Notch receptors. However, the physical interaction between the three DSL proteins and respective Notch receptors remained largely unknown. In this study, we investigated this issue through the targeting of Notch1 and Notch3 in two experimental systems using fusion proteins comprising their extracellular portions. Cell-binding assays showed that soluble forms of Notch1 and Notch3 proteins physically bound to the three DSL proteins on the cell surface. In solid-phase binding assays using immobilized soluble Notch1 and Notch3 proteins, it was revealed that each DSL protein directly bound to the soluble Notch proteins with different affinities. All interactions between the DSL proteins and soluble Notch proteins were dependent on Ca(2+). Taken together, these results suggest that Delta1, Jagged1, and Jagged2 are ligands for Notch1 and Notch3 receptors.     

Fringe differentially modulates Jagged1 and Delta1 signalling through Notch1 and Notch2

Proteins encoded by the fringe family of genes are required to modulate Notch signalling in a wide range of developmental contexts. Using a cell co-culture assay, we find that mammalian Lunatic fringe (Lfng) inhibits Jagged1-mediated signalling and potentiates Delta1-mediated signalling through Notch1. Lfng localizes to the Golgi, and Lfng-dependent modulation of Notch signalling requires both expression of Lfng in the Notch-responsive cell and the Notch extracellular domain. Lfng does not prevent binding of soluble Jagged1 or Delta1 to Notch1-expressing cells. Lfng potentiates both Jagged1- and Delta1-mediated signalling via Notch2, in contrast to its actions with Notch1. Our data suggest that Fringe-dependent differential modulation of the interaction of Delta/Serrate/Lag2 (DSL) ligands with their Notch receptors is likely to have a significant role in the combinatorial repertoire of Notch signalling in mammals.     

Differential regulation of osteoclastogenesis by Notch2/Delta-like 1 and Notch1/Jagged1 axes

Introduction

Osteoclastogenesis plays an important role in the bone erosion of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recently, Notch receptors have been implicated in the development of osteoclasts. However, the responsible Notch ligands have not been identified yet. This study was undertaken to determine the role of individual Notch receptors and ligands in osteoclastogenesis.

Methods

Mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages or human peripheral blood monocytes were used as osteoclast precursors and cultured with receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL) and macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) to induce osteoclasts. Osteoclasts were detected by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining. K/BxN serum-induced arthritic mice and ovariectomized mice were treated with anti-mouse Delta-like 1 (Dll1) blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb).

Results

Blockade of a Notch ligand Dll1 with mAb inhibited osteoclastogenesis and, conversely, immobilized Dll1-Fc fusion protein enhanced it in both mice and humans. In contrast, blockade of a Notch ligand Jagged1 enhanced osteoclastogenesis and immobilized Jagged1-Fc suppressed it. Enhancement of osteoclastogenesis by agonistic anti-Notch2 mAb suggested that Dll1 promoted osteoclastogenesis via Notch2, while suppression by agonistic anti-Notch1 mAb suggested that Jagged1 suppressed osteoclastogenesis via Notch1. Inhibition of Notch signaling by a gamma-secretase inhibitor suppressed osteoclastogenesis, implying that Notch2/Dll1-mediated enhancement was dominant. Actually, blockade of Dll1 ameliorated arthritis induced by K/BxN serum transfer, reduced the number of osteoclasts in the affected joints and suppressed ovariectomy-induced bone loss.

Conclusions

The differential regulation of osteoclastogenesis by Notch2/Dll1 and Notch1/Jagged1 axes may be a novel target for amelioration of bone erosion in RA patients.     

Netrin-1 in the developing enteric nervous system and colorectal cancer

Netrin-1 is a well-characterised chemoattractant involved in neuronal guidance in the developing enteric nervous system (ENS), but it is also a regulator of tumorigenesis. Two of its well-characterised receptors, deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC) and uncoordinated-5 homolog (UNC-5H), belong to a family of dependence receptors that transmit either pro- or anti-apoptosis signals depending on the availability of ligand, in this case netrin-1. This review summarises these two effects of netrin-1 and highlights the additional research needed information about to allow better utilisation of netrin-1 as a therapeutic target for axonal regeneration in the context of colorectal cancer.     

Expression of P2X6 receptors in the enteric nervous system of the rat gastrointestinal tract

Expression of P2X₄ and P2X₆ receptor subunits in the gastrointestinal tract of the rat was studied with double-labeling fluorescence immunohistochemistry. The results showed that P2X₆ receptors were expressed widely in the submucosal and myenteric plexuses. In the myenteric plexus, P2X₆ receptors were expressed mainly in large size neurons which resembled Dogiel type II neurons. These P2X₆ receptor-immunoreactive (ir) neurons also expressed calbindin 28K, calretinin and neuronal nuclei (NeuN), proteins that are markers of intrinsic sensory neurons. In the submucosal plexus, all the calbindin 28K, calretinin and NeuN-ir cells were immunoreactive for P2X₆ receptors. P2X₆ receptors do not form homomultimers, but rather heteromultimers with either P2X₂ or P2X₄ receptors. P2X₄ receptors were not expressed in neurons, but were expressed in macrophages of the rat gastrointestinal tract. These data indicate that P2X₆ receptors are mainly expressed on intrinsic sensory neurons and that ATP, via P2X₆ receptors probably in heteromeric combination with P2X₂ receptors, may be involved in regulating the physiological functions of these neurons.     

Development of the enteric nervous system

The mature enteric nervous system (ENS) is characterized by a degree of neuronal phenotypic diversity and independence of central nervous system control unequaled by any other region of the peripheral nervous system. Studies that have utilized the immunocytochemical demonstration of neurofilament protein and explanation of primordial gut with subsequent growth in culture have indicated that the neural crest precursors of enteric neurons are already committed to the neuronal lineage when they colonize the bowel; however, neuronal phenotypic expression occurs within the gut itself. It is likely that precursors able to give rise to each type of neuron found in the mature ENS are present among the earliest neural crest émigrés to reach the bowel. In mice a proximodistal wave of neuronal phenotypic expression occurs that does not appear to reflect the descent of neuronal precursors. This observation, the known plasticity of developing neural crest-derived neurons, and the demonstration of a persistent population of proliferating neuroblasts in the gut raise the possibility that enteric neuronal phenotypic expression is influenced by the enteric microenvironment.     

Expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor during the development of the human enteric nervous system

Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a neuropoietic cytokine, which promotes the development of enteric neurons in vitro, particularly when administered together with neurotrophin-3 (NT-3). The purpose of this study was to map the LIF immunoreactivity in the human enteric nervous system in foetuses, children, adults, and in patients with Hirschsprung's disease. Normal bowel specimens were obtained at postmortem examination of 13 foetuses, at 13–31 weeks of gestation, and at surgery in five children and two adults. Bowel resected in seven patients with Hirschsprung's disease was also investigated. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on material fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. The specimens were exposed to antibodies raised against LIF. The ABC-complex method was used to visualise binding of antibodies to the corresponding antigen. LIF immunoreactivity was disclosed in the myenteric and submucous ganglion cells at 13–31 weeks of gestation, in childhood cases, and adults. LIF-immunoreactive ganglion cells were absent in aganglionic bowel, where the ganglia in the intermuscular layer were replaced by hypertrophic nerve bundles. These morphological findings indicate that LIF may play a role in the development of the enteric nervous system.     

Characterization of HNK-1 antigens during the formation of the avian enteric nervous system.

During vertebrate embryogenesis, interaction between neural crest cells and the enteric mesenchyme gives rise to the development of the enteric nervous system. In birds, monoclonal antibody HNK-1 is a marker for neural crest cells from the entire rostrocaudal axis. In this study, we aimed to characterize the HNK-1 carrying cells and antigen(s) during the formation of the enteric nervous system in the hindgut. Immunohistological findings showed that HNK-1-positive mesenchymal cells are present in the gut prior to neural crest cell colonization. After neural crest cell colonization this cell type cannot be visualized anymore with the HNK-1 antibody. We characterized the HNK-1 antigens that are present before and after neural crest cell colonization of the hindgut. Immunoblot analysis of plasma membranes from embryonic hindgut revealed a wide array of HNK-1-carrying glycoproteins. We found that two HNK-1 antigens are present in E4 hindgut prior to neural crest cell colonization and that the expression of these antigens disappears after neural crest colonization. These two membrane glycoproteins, G-42 and G-44, have relative molecular masses of 42,000 and 44,000, respectively, and they both have isoelectric points of 5.5 under reducing conditions. We suggest that these HNK-1 antigens and the HNK-1-positive mesenchymal cells have some role in the formation of the enteric nervous system.     

Cell death and the developing enteric nervous system

This review discusses current knowledge about cell death in the developing enteric nervous system (ENS). It also includes findings about the molecular mechanisms by which such death is mediated. Additional consideration is given to trophic factors that contribute to survival of the precursors and neurons and glia of the ENS, as well to genes that, when mutated or deleted, trigger their death. Although further confirmation is needed, present observations support the view that enteric neural crest-derived precursor cells en route to the gut undergo substantial levels of apoptotic death, but that once these cells colonize the gut, there is relatively little death of precursor cells or of neurons and glia during the fetal period. There are also indications that normal neuron loss occurs in the ENS, but at times beyond the perinatal stage. Taken together, these findings suggest that ENS development is similar is some ways, but different in others from extra-enteric areas of the vertebrate central and peripheral nervous systems, in which large-scale apoptotic death of precursor neurons and glia occurs during the fetal and perinatal periods. Potential reasons for these differences are discussed such as a fetal enteric microenvironment that is especially rich in trophic support. In addition to the cell death that occurs during normal ENS development, this review discusses mechanisms of experimentally-induced ENS cell death, such as those that are associated with defective glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor/Ret signaling, which are an animal model of human congenital megacolon (aganglionosis; Hirschsprung’s disease). Such considerations underscore the importance of understanding cell death in the developing ENS, not just from a curiosity-driven point of view, but also because the pathophysiology behind many disorders of human gastrointestinal function may originate in abnormalities of the mechanisms that govern cell survival and death during ENS development.     

Fringe glycosyltransferases differentially modulate Notch1 proteolysis induced by Delta1 and Jagged1

Fringe O-fucose-beta1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases modulate Notch signaling by potentiating signaling induced by Delta-like ligands, while inhibiting signaling induced by Serrate/Jagged1 ligands. Based on binding studies, the differential effects of Drosophila fringe (DFng) on Notch signaling are thought to result from alterations in Notch glycosylation that enhance binding of Delta to Notch but reduce Serrate binding. Here, we report that expression of mammalian fringe proteins (Lunatic [LFng], Manic [MFng], or Radical [RFng] Fringe) increased Delta1 binding and activation of Notch1 signaling in 293T and NIH 3T3 cells. Although Jagged1-induced signaling was suppressed by LFng and MFng, RFng enhanced signaling induced by either Delta1 or Jagged1, underscoring the diversity of mammalian fringe glycosyltransferases in regulating signaling downstream of different ligand-receptor combinations. Interestingly, suppression of Jagged1-induced Notch1 signaling did not correlate with changes in Jagged1 binding as found for Delta1. Our data support the idea that fringe glycosylation increases Delta1 binding to potentiate signaling, but we propose that although fringe glycosylation does not reduce Jagged1 binding to Notch1, the resultant ligand-receptor interactions do not effectively promote Notch1 proteolysis required for activation of downstream signaling events.     

Roles for GFRalpha1 receptors in zebrafish enteric nervous system development

Components of the zebrafish GDNF receptor complex are expressed very early in the development of enteric nervous system precursors, and are already present as these cells begin to enter the gut and migrate caudally along its length. Both gfra1a and gfra1b as well as ret are expressed at this time, while gfra2 expression, the receptor component that binds the GDNF-related ligand neurturin, is not detected until the precursors have migrated along the gut. Gfra genes are also expressed in regions of the zebrafish brain and peripheral ganglia, expression domains conserved with other species. Enteric neurons are eliminated after injection with antisense morpholino oligonucleotides against ret or against both Gfra1 orthologs, but are not affected by antisense oligonucleotides against gfra2. Blocking GDNF signaling prevents migration of enteric neuron precursors, which remain positioned at the anterior end of the gut. Phenotypes induced by injection of antisense morpholinos against both Gfra orthologs can be rescued by introduction of mRNA for gfra1a or for gfra2, suggesting that GFRalpha1 and GFRalpha2 are functionally equivalent.     

Notch ligands with contrasting functions: Jagged1 and Delta1 in the mouse inner ear

Each of the sensory patches in the epithelium of the inner ear is a mosaic of hair cells and supporting cells. Notch signalling is thought to govern this pattern of differentiation through lateral inhibition. Recent experiments in the chick suggest, however, that Notch signalling also has a prior function - inductive rather than inhibitory - in defining the prosensory patches from which the differentiated cells arise. Several Notch ligands are expressed in each patch, but their individual roles in relation to the two functions of Notch signalling are unclear. We have used a Cre-LoxP approach to knock out two of these ligands, Delta1 (Dll1) and Jagged1 (Jag1), in the mouse ear. In the absence of Dll1, auditory hair cells develop early and in excess, in agreement with the lateral inhibition hypothesis. In the absence of Jag1, by contrast, the total number of these cells is strongly reduced, with complete loss of cochlear outer hair cells and some groups of vestibular hair cells, indicating that Jag1 is required for the prosensory inductive function of Notch. The number of cochlear inner hair cells, however, is almost doubled. This correlates with loss of expression of the cell cycle inhibitor p27(Kip1) (Cdkn1b), suggesting that signalling by Jag1 is also needed to limit proliferation of prosensory cells, and that there is a core part of this population whose prosensory character is established independently of Jag1-Notch signalling. Our findings confirm that Notch signalling in the ear has distinct prosensory and lateral-inhibitory functions, for which different ligands are primarily responsible.