Factors affecting the detection of potato leafroll virus in potato foliage by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Using antiserum globulins that reacted only weakly with plant materials, potato leafroll virus (PLRV) at 10 ng/ml was detected consistently by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The reaction with PLRV particles was slightly impaired in potato leaf extracts that were diluted less than 10^-1 but not at greater dilutions. Antiserum globulins that reacted more strongly with plant materials could be used satisfactorily for coating microtitre plates but were unsuitable for conjugating with enzyme. The detection end-point of PLRV, in leaf sap of potato cv. Cara plants grown from infected tubers in the glasshouse, was about 10^-2 and the virus was reliably detected in extracts of composite samples of one infected and 15 virus-free leaves. PLRV concentration was much less in extracts of roots or stolons than in leaf extracts. The virus was detected in infected leaves of all 27 cultivars tested. PLRV was readily detectable 2 wk before symptoms of secondary infection developed in field-grown plants of cv. Cara and Maris Piper and remained so for at least 5 wk. Its concentration was slightly greater in old than in young leaves and was similar to that in glasshouse-grown plants. In field-grown plants of cv. Maris Piper with primary infection, PLRV was detected in tip leaves 21–42 days after lower leaves were inoculated by aphids; in some shoots it later reached a concentration, in tip leaves, similar to that in leaves with secondary infection. Symptoms of primary infection developed in the young leaves of some infected shoots but were inconspicuous and were not observed until at least a week after PLRV was detected by ELISA.     

Application of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to the detection of potato leafroll virus in potato tubers

Factors affecting the detection of potato leafroll virus (PLRV) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in tubers of field-grown potato plants with primary or secondary infection were studied. The reactions of extracts of virus-free potato tubers were minimised by pre-incubating the extracts at room temperature and by careful choice of the dilution of enzyme-conjugated globulin. PLRV was reliably detected in tubers produced by secondarily infected plants of all six cultivars tested. PLRV concentration was greater in heel-end than in rose-end vascular tissue of recently harvested tubers but increased in rose-end tissue when tubers stored at 4°C for at least 5 months were placed at 15–24°C for 2 wk. PLRV occurred at greater concentration in tubers from plants of cv. Maris Piper with natural or experimentally induced primary infection than in tubers from secondarily infected plants; again PLRV concentration was greater in heel-end than in rose-end vascular tissue. Plants whose shoots were infected earliest in the growing season were invaded systemically and produced the greatest proportion of infected tubers; plants infected late in the season also produced infected tubers but PLRV was not detected in their shoot tops. PLRV concentration in tubers from the earliest-infected plants was less than in tubers from later-infected plants. PLRV was detected reliably by ELISA in tubers from progenies that were totally infected but was not detected in all infected tubers from partially infected progenies. ELISA is suitable as a routine method of indexing tubers for PLRV, although the virus will not be detected in all infected tubers produced by plants to which it is transmitted late in the growing season.     

Comparison of nucleic acid hybridisation and other tests for detecting tobacco rattle virus in narcissus plants and potato tubers

All isolates of tobacco rattle virus (TRV) found in naturally infected narcissus leaves produced nucleoprotein particles, mostly in large concentrations but, because of antigenic diversity, less than half of the isolates were identified by immunosorbent electron microscopy (ISEM) and still fewer by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All were identified by a nucleic acid hybridisation test in which DNA complementary to RNA-1 of strain PRN of TRV was allowed to react with nucleic acid extracted from leaf tissue. Spraing-affected tubers in some potato stocks yielded only NM isolates of TRV. These isolates do not produce virus particles and they were therefore not detected by ISEM. The infectivity of nucleic acid extracts from recently harvested tubers with spraing symptoms was much greater than that of extracts prepared from tubers after 8 months' storage. In other potato stocks, some spraing-affected tubers contained NM isolates and the rest contained particle-producing isolates (M isolates) of TRV. The infectivity of sap and of nucleic acid, extracted 7 months after harvest from tubers infected with M isolates, was much greater than that of nucleic acid extracted from comparable tubers infected with NM isolates. TRV was detected by nucleic acid hybridisation in extracts of almost all tubers containing either M or NM isolates, even when the tubers were not tested until 7–8 months after harvest. The probable sequence of events occurring after tubers are infected with TRV is outlined, and it is suggested that the virus will rarely become established in fields as a result of planting infected tubers.     

Resistance to potato virus Y and potato virus X in Solanurn brevidens

Although Solanum brevidens could be infected with potato virus X (PVX), potato virus Y⁰ (PVY⁰) and PVY^N, no symptoms of infection were apparent and tests by double antibody sandwich ELISA, electron microscopy and sap transmission to local lesion test plants indicated that the titres of PVX were less than a tenth of those of PVY⁰ and PVY^N were less than a hundredth of those in infected plants of PDH40, a susceptible dihaploid clone of S. tuberosum cv. Pentland Crown. Furthermore, PVY⁰- and PVY^N- infected leaves of S. brevidens were a poor source of inoculum in aphid transmission tests. The possibility of a common mechanism and genetic basis of resistance to PVY, PVX and potato leaf roll virus in S. brevidens is discussed.     

Restricted multiplication of potato leafroll virus in resistant potato genotypes

Plants of a range of potato genotypes differing in rating for field resistance to potato leafroll virus (PLRV) were inoculated with the virus by grafting or by aphids (Myzus persicae). Plants of all genotypes tested became infected by each inoculation method and PLRV was detected by ELISA in the upper leaves of all genotypes within 26 days after grafting. Most genotypes with high resistance ratings developed only mild primary and secondary symptoms whereas those with low resistance ratings developed more pronounced symptoms. However, one genotype (G7461(4)) with a high resistance rating was very severely affected. The concentrations attained by PLRV in genotypes with high resistance ratings were only 1–10% of those in genotypes with low resistance ratings. These differences in virus concentration were found in young leaves of plants with primary or secondary infection, whether inoculated by grafting or by aphids and whether grown in the glasshouse or the field. In older leaves, differences in virus concentration between genotypes were at least as pronounced as those in younger leaves. In contrast, PLRV concentration in vascular tissue at the heel end of tubers of plants with primary infection was similar for all the genotypes tested. Although low PLRV concentration was consistently associated with high resistance rating it is not the only form of resistance to PLRV occurring in potato.     

Quantitative studies on the uptake and retention of potato leafroll virus by aphids in laboratory and field conditions

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was adapted for the efficient detection and assay of potato leafroll virus (PLRV) in aphids. Best results were obtained when aphids were extracted in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and the extracts incubated at 37 °C for 1 h before starting the assay. Using batches of 20 green peach aphids (Myzus persicae), about 0.01 ng PLRV/aphid could be detected. The virus could also be detected in single aphids allowed a 1-day acquisition access period on infected potato leaves. The PLRV content of aphids depended on the age of potato source-plants and the position of source leaves on them. It increased with increase in acquisition access period up to 7 days but differed considerably between individual aphids. A maximum of 7 ng PLRV/aphid was recorded but aphids more usually accumulated about 0.2 ng PLRV per day. When aphids were allowed acquisition access periods of 1–3 days, and then caged singly on Physalis floridana seedlings for 3 days, the PLRV content of each aphid, measured subsequently, was not strongly correlated with the infection of P. floridana. The concentration of PLRV in leaf extracts differed only slightly when potato plants were kept at 15, 20, 25 or 30 °C for 1 or 2 wk, but the virus content of aphids kept on leaves at the different temperatures decreased with increase of temperature. PLRV was transmitted readily to P. floridana at all temperatures, but by a slightly smaller proportion of aphids, and after a longer latent period, at 15 °C than at 30 °C. The PLRV content of M. persicae fed on infected potato leaves decreased with increasing time after transfer to turnip (immune to PLRV). The decrease occurred in two phases, the first rapid and the second very slow. In the first phase the decrease was faster, briefer and greater at 25 and 30 °C than at 15 and 20 °C. No evidence was obtained that PLRV multiplies in M. persicae. These results are compatible with a model in which much of the PLRV in aphids during the second phase is in the haemocoele, and transmission is mainly limited by the rate of passage of virus particles from haemolymph to saliva. The potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae, transmitted PLRV much less efficiently than M. persicae. Its inefficiency as a vector could not be ascribed to failure to acquire or retain PLRV, or to the degradation of virus particles in the aphid. Probably only few PLRV particles pass from the haemolymph to saliva in this species. The virus content of M. euphorbiae collected from PLRV-infected potato plants in the field increased from early June to early July, and then decreased. PLRV was detected both in spring migrants collected from the plants and in summer migrants caught in yellow water-traps. PLRV was also detected in M. persicae collected from infected plants in July and August, and in trapped summer migrants, but their PLRV content was less than that of M. euphorbiae, and in some instances was too small for unequivocal detection.     

Multiple components of the resistance of potatoes to potato leafroll virus

In glasshouse experiments the ranking of potato genotypes for resistance to infection with potato leafroll virus (PLRV) using three concentrations of aphid-borne inoculum was the same as their field resistance ratings. In field-grown plants this resistance to infection increased in all genotypes as the plants aged but its rate of increase differed between genotypes. In tests on field-grown plants infected by aphid- or graft-inoculation, the proportion of virus-free progeny tubers increased the later the date of inoculation but was greater in resistant than in susceptible genotypes. This trend was most pronounced in the resistant clone G7445(1), in which the virus failed to move from the foliage to the tubers of some plants infected in glasshouse tests. The spread of PLRV will thus be minimised in crops of resistant compared with susceptible genotypes for three reasons: plants have greater resistance to infection, systemic spread of virus from their foliage to tubers is less likely and, as shown previously, the low concentration of virus particles in leaf tissue makes infected plants less potent sources of inoculum for aphids.     

Infection of potato plants with potato leafroll virus changes attraction and feeding behaviour of Myzus persicae

Potato leafroll virus (PLRV; genus Polerovirus, family Luteoviridae) is a persistently transmitted circulative virus that depends on aphids for spreading. The primary vector of PLRV is the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Solanum tuberosum L. potato cv. Kardal (Solanaceae) has a certain degree of resistance to M. persicae: young leaves seem to be resistant, whereas senescent leaves are susceptible. In this study, we investigated whether PLRV‐infection of potato plants affected aphid behaviour. We found that M. persicae's ability to differentiate headspace volatiles emitted from PLRV‐infected and non‐infected potato plants depends on the age of the leaf. In young apical leaves, no difference in aphid attraction was found between PLRV‐infected and non‐infected leaves. In fact, hardly any aphids were attracted. On the contrary, in mature leaves, headspace volatiles from virus infected leaves attracted the aphids. We also studied the effect of PLRV‐infection on probing and feeding behaviour (plant penetration) of M. persicae using the electrical penetration graph technique (DC system). Several differences were observed between plant penetration in PLRV‐infected and non‐infected plants, but only after infected plants showed visual symptoms of PLRV infection. The effects of PLRV‐infection in plants on the behaviour of M. persicae, the vector of the virus, and the implications of these effects on the transmission of the virus are thoroughly discussed.     

Restricted distribution of potato leafroll virus antigen in resistant potato genotypes and its effect on transmission of the virus by aphids

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the concentration of potato leafroll virus (PLRV) antigen in different parts of field-grown secondarily infected plants of three potato genotypes known to differ in resistance to infection. The antigen concentration in leaves of cv. Maris Piper (susceptible) was 10–30 times greater than that in cv. Pentland Crown or G 7445(1), a breeder's line (both resistant). Differences between genotypes in antigen concentration were smaller in petioles and tubers (5–10-fold) and in above-ground stems (about 4-fold), and were least in below-ground stems, stolons and roots (about 2-fold). PLRV antigen, detected by fluorescent antibody staining of tissue sections, was confined to phloem companion cells. In Pentland Crown, the decrease in PLRV antigen concentration in leaf mid-veins and petioles, relative to that in Maris Piper, was proportional to the decrease in number of PLRV-containing companion cells; this decrease was greater in the external phloem than in the internal phloem. The spread of PLRV infection within the phloem system seems to be impaired in the resistant genotypes. Green peach aphids (Myzuspersicae) acquired < 2800 pg PLRV/aphid when fed for 4 days on infected field-grown Maris Piper plants and < 58% of such aphids transmitted the virus to Physalis floridana test plants. In contrast, aphids fed on infected Pentland Crown plants acquired <120 pg PLRV/aphid and <3% transmitted the virus to P. floridana. The ease with which M. persicae acquired and transmitted PLRV from field-grown Maris Piper plants decreased greatly after the end of June without a proportionate drop in PLRV concentration. Spread of PLRV in potato crops should be substantially decreased by growing cultivars in which the virus multiplies to only a limited extent.     

应用酶联免疫吸附试验检测马铃薯卷叶病毒

以辣根过氧化物酶标记马铃薯卷叶病毒抗体,采用双抗体夹心ELISA方法鉴定了马铃薯和洋酸浆的茎、叶、根及马铃薯块茎中的马铃薯卷叶病毒(Potato Leafroll Virus,PLRV),结果表明,对提纯的PLRV可测出的最低浓度为25ng/ml,当包被抗体浓度为40μg/ml、酶标记抗体稀释度为1/120时,可测出马铃薯茎、叶和根汁液中的PLRV,感染PLRV的洋酸浆茎、叶和根汁液的消光值,均比无病对照者高二倍以上,虽然感染PLRV的马铃薯休眠块茎维管束组织汁液的消光值高于无病毒对照,且脐部维管束组织消光值高于顶端,但测定打破休眠的感病块茎顶端维管束组织的阳性结果更为可靠和明显。     

Increased sensitivity of detection of plant viruses obtained by using a fluorogenic substrate in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

The fluorogenic substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate (MUP) of alkaline phosphatase was compared with the chromogenic substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate (NPP) in tests for plant viruses by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In tests on leaf extracts of squash infected with prune dwarf virus, Chenopodium quinoa and apple infected with apple mosaic virus (ApMV), and potato infected with potato leafroll virus (PLRV), MUP increased sensitivity 2–16 times, the smallest and greatest increases being obtained with ApMV (in apple) and PLRV respectively. In similar tests on 21 dormant PLRV-infected potato tubers, sensitivity was increased 2–4 times with 13 tubers, but the two substrates gave the same detection end-points with eight tubers. When individual seeds of potato plants infected with the Andean potato calico strain of tobacco ringspot virus were tested, the virus was detected in virtually all seeds by MUP-ELISA, but detection by NPP-ELISA was inefficient unless absorbance values were measured after overnight incubation at 4 °C, instead of after 2 h at room temperature. In tests on Myzus persicae carrying PLRV and Sitobion avenae carrying barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV), both viruses were consistently detected in a greater proportion of individual aphids by MUP-ELISA than NPP-ELISA irrespective of whether incubation was for 2 h at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C. The effeciency of detection of virus in single viruliferous aphids by MUP-ELISA was not decreased by grouping with one or four non-viruliferous aphids but was decreased (PLRV) or greatly decreased (BYDV) by grouping with nine. MUP-ELISA and transmission tests to Physalis floridana seedlings (2–3 day inoculation access periods) both detected PLRV in most individual M. persicae, but the results obtained with the two methods did not correlate completely. In similar tests for BYDV in individual S. avenae, virtually all aphids transmitted BYDV to oat seedlings during a 3-day inoculation access period but it was subsequently detected by MUP-ELISA in less than half of them. By contrast, MUP-ELISA detected PLRV in most viruliferous M. persicae even after they had fed for 3 days on Chinese cabbage, a non-host for this virus.     

Host range and properties of potato black ringspot virus

Potato black ringspot virus (PBRV), obtained from cultivated potato in Peru, was found to have a very wide host range resembling that of tobacco ringspot virus (TRSV-B), to which PBRV is distantly related serologically. However, PBRV caused the more severe symptoms in many species and, unlike TRSV B, infected Lycopersicon esculentum and Cyamopsis tetragonoloba. In Solanum tuberosum, PBRV caused necrotic spots and ringspots in systemically infected leaves in the year of infection and was readily transmitted through tubers to progeny plants, most of which developed no obvious symptoms although systemically infected. TRSV-B infected non-inoculated S. tuberosum leaves only sporadically, did not induce symptoms in them and was not transmitted through tubers to progeny plants. PBRV was cultured in Nicotiana clevelandii and infectivity was assayed in Cheno-podium amaranticolor or C. quinoa. Virus particles were purified from leaf extracts, after clarification using chloroform, by precipitation with 6% polyethylene glycol and differential centrifugation. Purified preparations contained 25 nm diameter isometric particles with somewhat angular outlines, sedimenting as three components (T, M and B) at 49, 84 and 117 S, and containing a single protein species of mol. wt 59 000. Preparations of PBRV nucleic acid contained two species, estimated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in non-denaturing conditions to have mol. wt of about 25 10⁶ (RNA-1) and 15 10⁶ (RNA-2). Infectivity was associated with B particles, preparations of which contained RNA-1 and RNA-2, presumably in different particles. M particles contained RNA-2, were not infective and enhanced infectivity only slightly when added to B particles. Similar relative amounts of RNA-1 and RNA-2 were extracted from unfractionated virus using phenol or Pronase, but preparations obtained using phenol were much the more infective. PBRV has properties typical of nepoviruses; its present cryptogram is (R/1):2–5/41 + 15/28 or 2 1 5/46:S/S:S/*, nepovirus group.     

HEAT INACTIVATION OF LEAF-ROLL VIRUS IN POTATO TUBERS

When potato tubers were stored at 37^-5^° C. in a humid atmosphere, some lost their germinating power after 20 days but others survived up to 40 days. All tubers infected with leaf-roll virus that survived 25 days at this temperature produced healthy plants. Similar treatments up to 40 days did not free tubers from potato viruses X and Y.     

Accumulation of potato virus Y is enhanced in Solatium brevidens also infected with tobacco mosaic virus or potato spindle tuber viroid

The accumulation of potato virus Y?(PVY?) and potato leaf roll virus (PLRV) was studied in plants of Solanum brevidens co-infected with each of six viruses or a viroid. Virus could not be detected by ELISA in plants of S. brevidens infected solely with PVY. However, accumulation of PVY was increased c. 1000-fold in plants doubly infected with tobacco mosaic virus or potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTVd). PVY titres in doubly infected plants of S. brevidens were between 1% and 0.1% of those found in the PVY-susceptible interspecific Solanum hybrid DTO-33. Double infections of 5. brevidens by PVY and alfalfa mosaic virus or potato viruses M, S, T or X did not significantly enhance PVY accumulation. Accumulation of PLRV was not enhanced in plants co-infected with any of the six viruses or PSTVd.     

Resistance to potato leafroll luteovirus can be greatly improved by combining two independent types of heritable resistance

Twelve potato clones were exposed to infection by aphids with potato leafroll luteovirus (PLRV) in three field trials in order to assess their resistance to infection. Up to 92% of the plants of some clones became infected, although other clones were relatively resistant to infection and one clone remained virus-free in all three trials. The resistance of the same 12 clones to PLRV multiplication was assessed in glasshouse-grown plant: lants were graft-inoculated and their daughter tubers were used to grow plants with secondary infection. High concentrations of PLRV were found in some clones (c. 1700 ng/g leaf) while in others much less virus accumulated (as little as 60 ng/g leaf). However, clones in which little virus accumulated were not necessarily those which were most resistant to infection in the field, and there was no association between the two types of resistance. Nevertheless, both types of resistance were found in some clones. The clone G8107(1), which remained virus-free in all the field exposure trials, was also the most resistant to PLRV multiplication. The combination of these two types of resistance in cultivars should help to eliminate the spread of PLRV in crops.     

New approaches for restricting spread of potato leafroll virus by different methods of eradicating infected plants from potato crops

Experiments were made at Invergowrie in 1984 and 1985 to compare the spread of potato leafroll virus (PLRV) after removing infected plants by three different methods; conventional roguing, desiccation with diquat, or incineration for 45–60s using a propane gas flame. Potato leaf roll 'infector' plants, grown in plots of virus-free Maris Piper seed potatoes, were artificially infested in June with aphids (Myzus persicae) from a laboratory culture, and removed from the plots after 2 or 3 wk. In both years, natural infestations of potato aphids were scarce during this period. There was no significant difference in the proportion of tubers infected with PLRV in adjacent plants after the neighbouring infector plants had been rogued by hand or desiccated with diquat, but the proportion was considerably reduced following incineration of the infector plants. In 1984, the spread of PLRV in conventionally rogued plots was also significantly reduced by a mixture of deltamethrin plus heptenophos, applied four times from 80% crop emergence, and was almost eliminated by a treatment with aldicarb granules, either at planting, or as a side-dressing 5 wk later. In 1985, delaying infector removal by 8 days in early July significantly increased the spread of PLRV to neighbouring plants from 2.3% (1 July) to 8.3% (9 July). A single application of deltamethrin plus heptenophos to infectors 1 wk before removal did not significantly decrease spread. Although incineration was quick and effective, the value of this method of eradicating infector plants in seed potato crops is limited because it failed to destroy infected tubers.