Evaluation of COMU as a coupling reagent for in situ neutralization Boc solid phase peptide synthesis

Benzotriazole‐based coupling reagents have dominated the last two decades of solid phase peptide synthesis. However, a growing interest in synthesizing complex peptides has stimulated the search for more efficient and low‐cost coupling reagents, such as COMU which has been introduced as a nonexplosive alternative to the classic benzotriazole coupling reagents. Here, we present a comparative study of the coupling efficiency of COMU with the benzotriazole‐based HBTU and HCTU for use in in situ neutralization Boc‐SPPS. Difficult sequences, such as ACP(65–74), Jung–Redeman 10‐mer, and HIV‐1 PR(81–99), were used as model target peptides on polystyrene‐based resins, as well as polyethylene glycol‐based resins. Coupling yields obtained using fast in situ Boc‐SPPS cycles were determined with the quantitative ninhydrin test as well as via LC‐MS analysis of the crude cleavage products. Our results demonstrate that COMU coupling efficiency was less effective compared to HBTU and HCTU with HCTU ≥ HBTU > COMU, when polystyrene‐based resins were employed. However, when the PEG resin was employed in combination with a safety catch amide (SCAL) linker, more comparable yields were observed for the three coupling reagents with the same ranking HCTU ≥ HBTU > COMU. Copyright © 2012 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

COMU: scope and limitations of the latest innovation in peptide acyl transfer reagents

The methodology for peptide bond formation is undergoing a continuous evolution where the main actors are being renewed. In recent years, coupling reagents based on the Oxyma scaffold, such as the uronium salt COMU, has been a groundbreaking contribution to the field. The advantages of COMU over classic benzotriazole‐based reagents (HATU, HBTU, HCTU, TBTU) were proven in terms of solubility and coupling efficiency in bulky junctions in our groups and others. However, some aspects of the use of COMU need to be revised and improved, such as the stability of commercial samples in organic solvents, which hampers the compatibility with long synthesis in automated synthesizers. In this review, an overview of the main features and suggestions to improve the use of COMU are presented, along with a discussion on the best conditions for its use in microwave‐assisted peptide robots. Copyright © 2013 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Complete synthesis of the bicyclic ring of a mutacin analog with orthogonally protected lanthionine via solid‐phase intracyclization

Mutacin 1140 (MU1140) is a naturally occurring lantibiotic derived from posttranslational modifications of a ribosomally synthesized peptide during the fermentation of a bacterium called Streptococcus mutans, the etiological agent of dental cavities. A practical approach for chemically synthesizing lantibiotics would be a valuable tool to expand the MU1140 library with additional semisynthetic analogs. In turn, an expanded library may prove useful to explore additional therapeutic indications for this pipeline of novel compounds. In this work, orthogonally protected lanthionine analogs were synthesized via an aziridine ring opening strategy. This lanthionine was utilized to synthesize a cysteamine (Cya) instead of the (S)‐aminovinyl‐D‐cysteine (AviCys) that is naturally found in MU1140. The Cya containing bicyclic C/D ring of MU1140 was synthesized by Fmoc solid‐phase peptide synthesis (SPPS). The linear peptides were synthesized using OPfp ester derivatives and using various common coupling reagents such as COMU and TCTU. The linear peptide was intracyclized with DEPBT to construct the so‐called bicyclic ring C/D. This is the first report on the complete chemical synthesis of the bicyclic C/D ring of a MU1140 analog using orthogonally protected lanthionines using SPPS.     

Re‐evaluating the stability of COMU in different solvents

COMU is uronium‐type coupling reagent based on OxymaPure. It showed several advantages over classical benzotriazole‐based coupling reagents such as higher solubility, water‐soluble byproduct, and monitoring the reaction by changing of color. Although COMU is well known to perform excellent in solution, but its hydrolytic stability in DMF limits its use in automatic peptide synthesizer. Herein, we evaluated the hydrolytic stability of COMU in γ‐valerolactone (GVL), acetonitrile (ACN) and N‐formylmorpholine (NFM) and compared its stability against DMF. The stability of COMU after 24 h was found to be 88 and 89% in GVL and ACN, respectively, when compared in DMF (14%). Further, the demanding Aib‐ACP decapeptide and JR decapeptide were successfully synthesized using COMU dissolved in GVL or ACN while Fmoc amino acids were dissolved in DMF. Copyright © 2017 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

COMU: A third generation of uronium‐type coupling reagents

COMU is a third generation of uronium‐type coupling reagent based on ethyl 2‐cyano‐2‐(hydroxyimino)acetate (Oxyma) as well as a morpholino carbon skeleton. The presence of the morpholino group has a marked influence on the solubility, stability and reactivity of the reagent. COMU performed extremely well in the presence of only 1 equiv. of base, thereby confirming the effect of the hydrogen bond acceptor in the reaction. The by‐products of COMU are water soluble and easily removed, making it an excellent choice of coupling reagent for solution‐phase peptide synthesis. Finally, COMU shows a less hazardous safety profile than benzotriazole‐based reagents, such as HATU and HBTU, which in addition exhibit unpredictable autocatalytic decompositions and therefore a higher risk of explosion. Furthermore, in contrast to benzotriazole‐based reagents, COMU is significantly less likely to cause allergic reaction. Copyright © 2009 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Recent advances in solid-phase peptide synthesis and preparation of antibodies to synthetic peptides

Peptides prepared by the solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) approach are used increasingly in biological research, for instance to elicit anti-peptide antibodies that will recognize the intact, cognate protein. Recent advances in SPPS are reviewed, including the use of new coupling reagents, new methods for evaluating peptide purity and new techniques of automated and multiple peptide synthesis. Methods for enhancing peptide immunogenicity are discussed such as the use of adjuvants and liposomes, and of synthetic branched polypeptides as carriers.     

Fast conventional Fmoc solid‐phase peptide synthesis: a comparative study of different activators

The ability to speed up conventional Fmoc solid‐phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) has many advantages including increased productivity. One way to speed up conventional Fmoc SPPS is the choice of activator. Recently, several new activators have been introduced into the market, and they were evaluated along with some older activators for their ability to synthesize a range of peptides with shorter and longer reaction times. It was found that HDMC, PyClock, COMU, HCTU, and HATU worked well at shorter reaction times (2 × 1 min), but PyOxim and TFFH only worked well at longer reaction times. The performance of PyBOP at shorter reaction times was poor only for more difficult sequences. These results are important for selecting an appropriate activator for fast SPPS applications. Copyright © 2011 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Improved Fmoc‐based solid‐phase synthesis of homologous peptide fragments of human and mouse prion proteins

The synthesis of difficult peptide sequences has been a challenge since the very beginning of SPPS. The self‐assembly of the growing peptide chains has been proposed as one of the causes of this synthetic problem. However, there is an increasing need to obtain peptides and proteins that are prone to aggregate. These peptides and proteins are generally associated with diseases known as amyloidoses. We present an efficient SPPS of two homologous peptide fragments of HuPrP (106–126) and MoPrP105–125 based on the use of the PEGA resin combined with proper coupling approaches. These peptide fragments were also studied by CD and TEM to determine their ability to aggregate. On the basis of these results, we support PEG‐based resins as an efficient synthetic tool to prepare peptide sequences prone to aggregate on‐resin. Copyright © 2010 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Evaluation of acid‐labile S‐protecting groups to prevent Cys racemization in Fmoc solid‐phase peptide synthesis

Phosphonium and uronium salt‐based reagents enable efficient and effective coupling reactions and are indispensable in peptide chemistry, especially in machine‐assisted SPPS. However, after the activating and coupling steps with these reagents in the presence of tertiary amines, Fmoc derivatives of Cys are known to be considerably racemized during their incorporation. To avoid this side reaction, a coupling method mediated by phosphonium/uronium reagents with a weaker base, such as 2,4,6‐trimethylpyridine, than the ordinarily used DIEA or that by carbodiimide has been recommended. However, these methods are appreciably inferior to the standard protocol applied for SPPS, that is, a 1 min preactivation procedure of coupling with phosphonium or uronium reagents/DIEA in DMF, in terms of coupling efficiency, and also the former method cannot reduce racemization of Cys(Trt) to an acceptable level (<1.0%) even when the preactivation procedure is omitted. Here, the 4,4′‐dimethoxydiphenylmethyl and 4‐methoxybenzyloxymethyl groups were demonstrated to be acid‐labile S‐protecting groups that can suppress racemization of Cys to an acceptable level (<1.0%) when the respective Fmoc derivatives are incorporated via the standard SPPS protocol of phosphonium or uronium reagents with the aid of DIEA in DMF. Furthermore, these protecting groups significantly reduced the rate of racemization compared to the Trt group even in the case of microwave‐assisted SPPS performed at a high temperature. © 2013 The Authors. European Peptide Society published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

BOP‐OXy,BOP‐OBt,and BOP‐OAt: novel organophosphinic coupling reagents useful for solution and solid‐phase peptide synthesis

Stand‐alone coupling reagents derived from bis(2‐oxo‐3‐oxazolidinyl)phosphorodiamidic chloride show efficient performance in solution and SPPS. In particular, the Oxyma Pure (Luxembourg Biotech., Tel Aviv, Israel) derivative shows the additional advantage of being highly soluble in DMF and even fairly soluble in CH₃CN, which can extend its use for the synthesis of complex peptides. These new stand‐alone coupling reagents have the advantage of not bearing any counteranion such as PF₆ or BH₄, whose presence can jeopardize the purification of final peptides prepared in solution. Copyright © 2013 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Automated ‘X‐Y’ robot for peptide synthesis with microwave heating: application to difficult peptide sequences and protein domains

Precise microwave heating has emerged as a valuable method to aid solid‐phase peptide synthesis (SPPS). New methods and reliable protocols, as well as their embodiment in automated instruments, are required to fully use this potential. Here we describe a new automated robotic instrument for SPPS with microwave heating, report protocols for its reliable use and report the application to the synthesis of long sequences, including the β‐amyloid 1‐42 peptide. The instrument is built around a valve‐free robot originally developed for parallel peptide synthesis, where the robotic arm transports reagents instead of pumping reagents via valves. This is the first example of an ‘X‐Y’ robotic microwave‐assisted synthesizer developed for the assembly of long peptides. Although the instrument maintains its capability for parallel synthesis at room temperature, in this paper, we focus on sequential peptide synthesis with microwave heating. With this valve‐free instrument and the protocols developed for its use, fast and efficient syntheses of long and difficult peptide sequences were achieved. Copyright © 2010 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Solid phase peptide synthesis in water VI: evaluation of water-soluble coupling reagents for solid phase peptide synthesis in aqueous media

Solid phase peptide synthesis requires large amounts of organic solvents, the safe disposal of which is an important environmental issue. Peptide synthesis, if performed in water and using less or nontoxic reagents, circumvents the disposal problem. Our ultimate aim is to develop an "environment-friendly" solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) methodology. Previously, we showed that SPPS in water is feasible. To perform SPPS in water, the coupling reagent must be water-soluble and maintain its reactivity in water. For this report, we tested the efficacy of the water-soluble coupling reagents, 2-(5-norbornene-2,3-dicarboximido)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate (TNTU) and 4-(4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholinium chloride (DMT-MM), towards SPPS in water. We successfully synthesized Leu-enkephalin amide on a solid support suspended in aqueous 50% EtOH using DMT-MM and 2-(4-sulfophenylsulfonyl)ethoxycarbonylamino acids.     

New method for peptide purification based on selective removal of truncation peptide impurities after SPPS with orthogonal capping

Peptide purification by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is associated with high solvent consumption, relatively large effort and lack of efficient parallelization. As an alternative, many catch-and-release (c&r) purification methods have been developed over the last decades to enable the efficient parallel purification of peptides originating from solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS). However, with one exception, none of the c&r systems has been widely established in industry and academia until today. Herein, we present an entirely new chromatography-free purification concept for peptides synthesized on a solid support, termed reactive capping purification (RCP). The RCP method relies on the capping of truncation peptides arising from incomplete coupling of amino acids during SPPS with a reactive tag. The reactive tag contains a masked functionality that, upon liberation during cleavage from the resin, enables straightforward purification of the peptide by incubation with a resin-bound reactive moiety. In this work, two different reactive tags based on masked thiols were developed. Capping with these reactive tags during SPPS led to effective modification of truncated sequences and subsequent removal of the latter by chemoselective reaction with a maleimide-functionalized solid support. By introducing a suitable protecting group strategy, the thiol-based RCP method described here could also be successfully applied to a thiol-containing peptide. Finally, the purification of a 15-meric peptide by the RCP method was demonstrated. The developed method has low solvent consumption, has the potential for efficient parallelization, uses readily available reagents, and is experimentally simple to perform.     

Solid-phase peptide synthesis: from standard procedures to the synthesis of difficult sequences

This protocol for solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) is based on the widely used Fmoc/tBu strategy, activation of the carboxyl groups by aminium-derived coupling reagents and use of PEG-modified polystyrene resins. A standard protocol is described, which was successfully applied in our lab for the synthesis of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), >400 CRF analogs and a countless number of other peptides. The 41-mer peptide CRF is obtained within approximately 80 working hours. To achieve the so-called difficult sequences, special techniques have to be applied in order to reduce aggregation of the growing peptide chain, which is the main cause of failure for peptide chemosynthesis. Exemplary application of depsipeptide and pseudoproline units is shown for synthesizing an extremely difficult sequence, the Asn(15) analog of the WW domain FBP28, which is impossible to obtain using the standard protocol.     

Methods and protocols of modern solid phase peptide synthesis

The purpose of this article is to delineate strategic considerations and provide practical procedures to enable non-experts to synthesize peptides with a reasonable chance of success. This article is not encyclopedic but rather devoted to the Fmoc/tBu approach of solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), which is now the most commonly used methodology for the production of peptides. The principles of SPPS with a review of linkers and supports currently employed are presented. Basic concepts for the different steps of SPPS such as anchoring, deprotection, coupling reaction and cleavage are all discussed along with the possible problem of aggregation and side-reactions. Essential protocols for the synthesis of fully deprotected peptides are presented including resin handling, coupling, capping, Fmoc-deprotection, final cleavage and disulfide bridge formation.     

Novel amino-Li resin for water-based solid-phase peptide synthesis

We report the first application of a novel amino-Li resin to water-based solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) applying the Smoc-protecting group approach. We demonstrated that it is a suitable support for the sustainable water-based alternative to a classical SPPS approach. The resin possesses good swelling properties in aqueous milieu, provides significant coupling sites, and may be applicable to the synthesis of difficult sequences and aggregation-prone peptides.     

Advances in Fmoc solid‐phase peptide synthesis

Today, Fmoc SPPS is the method of choice for peptide synthesis. Very‐high‐quality Fmoc building blocks are available at low cost because of the economies of scale arising from current multiton production of therapeutic peptides by Fmoc SPPS. Many modified derivatives are commercially available as Fmoc building blocks, making synthetic access to a broad range of peptide derivatives straightforward. The number of synthetic peptides entering clinical trials has grown continuously over the last decade, and recent advances in the Fmoc SPPS technology are a response to the growing demand from medicinal chemistry and pharmacology. Improvements are being continually reported for peptide quality, synthesis time and novel synthetic targets. Topical peptide research has contributed to a continuous improvement and expansion of Fmoc SPPS applications. Copyright © 2015 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Cu(OBt)2 and Cu(OAt)2, copper(II)-based racemization suppressors ready for use in fully automated solid-phase peptide synthesis.

The complexes Cu(OBt)2 and Cu(OAt)2, which are derived from copper(II) and HOBt and HOAt, respectively, are shown to be more effective in suppressing racemization during solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) than are those compounds currently being used for this purpose. These compounds can readily be used in conjunction with the commonly applied coupling reagents in fully automated systems for solid-phase peptide chemistry.     

Microwave‐assisted solid‐phase peptide synthesis at 60 °C: alternative conditions with low enantiomerization

Several conditions have been used in the coupling reaction of stepwise SPPS at elevated temperature (SPPS‐ET), but we have elected the following as our first choice: 2.5‐fold molar excess of 0.04–0.08 M Boc or Fmoc‐amino acid derivative, equimolar amount of DIC/HOBt (1:1) or TBTU/DIPEA (1:3), 25% DMSO/toluene, 60 °C, conventional heating. In this study, aimed to further examine enantiomerization under such condition and study the applicability of our protocols to microwave‐SPPS, peptides containing L ‐Ser, L ‐His, L ‐Cys and/or L ‐Met were manually synthesized traditionally, at 60 °C using conventional heating and at 60 °C using microwave heating. Detailed assessment of all crude peptides (in their intact and/or fully hydrolyzed forms) revealed that, except for the microwave‐assisted coupling of L ‐Cys, all other reactions occurred with low levels of amino acid enantiomerization (<2%). Therefore, herein we (i) provide new evidences that our protocols for SPPS at 60 °C using conventional heating are suitable for routine use, (ii) demonstrate their appropriateness for microwave‐assisted SPPS by Boc and Fmoc chemistries, (iii) disclose advantages and limitations of the three synthetic approaches employed. Thus, this study complements our past research on SPPS‐ET and suggests alternative conditions for microwave‐assisted SPPS. Copyright © 2009 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Some Mechanistic Aspects on Fmoc Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis

Peptides are biomolecules that may have several biological activities which makes them important to the environment in which they operate. Sometimes it is necessary for larger amounts of peptides to carry out some studies, like biological tests, NMR structural research or even interaction studies between peptides with other molecules. Expression can be an alternative for that. However, synthesis is specially useful when unnatural modifications or introduction of site specific tags are required. Synthetic peptides have been used for different studies such as cell signaling, development of epitope-specific antibodies, in cell-biology, biomarkers for diseases etc. Many different methodologies for peptide synthesis can be found in the literature. Solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) has been largely used and can be an excellent alternative to achieve larger quantities of these biomolecules. In this mini review, we aim to describe the SPPS and explain some of the mechanistic aspects and reagents involved in all phases of the synthesis: the use of resin, the ninhydrin test, some of the protecting groups, coupling reagents for peptide bond formation and the cleavage process.