Downregulation of Rap1GAP in Human Tumor Cells Alters Cell/Matrix and Cell/Cell Adhesion

Rap1GAP expression is decreased in human tumors. The significance of its downregulation is unknown. We show that Rap1GAP expression is decreased in primary colorectal carcinomas. To elucidate the advantages conferred on tumor cells by loss of Rap1GAP, Rap1GAP expression was silenced in human colon carcinoma cells. Suppressing Rap1GAP induced profound alterations in cell adhesion. Rap1GAP-depleted cells exhibited defects in cell/cell adhesion that included an aberrant distribution of adherens junction proteins. Depletion of Rap1GAP enhanced adhesion and spreading on collagen. Silencing of Rap expression normalized spreading and restored E-cadherin, β-catenin, and p120-catenin to cell/cell contacts, indicating that unrestrained Rap activity underlies the alterations in cell adhesion. The defects in adherens junction protein distribution required integrin signaling as E-cadherin and p120-catenin were restored at cell/cell contacts when cells were plated on poly-l-lysine. Unexpectedly, Src activity was increased in Rap1GAP-depleted cells. Inhibition of Src impaired spreading and restored E-cadherin at cell/cell contacts. These findings provide the first evidence that Rap1GAP contributes to cell/cell adhesion and highlight a role for Rap1GAP in regulating cell/matrix and cell/cell adhesion. The frequent downregulation of Rap1GAP in epithelial tumors where alterations in cell/cell and cell/matrix adhesion are early steps in tumor dissemination supports a role for Rap1GAP depletion in tumor progression.Mammalian Rap proteins Rap1a/b and Rap2a/b/c are members of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases. Rap proteins are active when bound to GTP and inactive when bound to GDP. Cellular Rap activity is regulated by the concerted action of guanine nucleotide exchange factors that activate Rap (RapGEFs) and Rap-specific GTPase-activating proteins (RapGAPs) that inactivate Rap (reviewed in reference 10). The Rap1GAP family is composed of several members, including Rap1GAP, Rap1GAPII, Spa-1/SIPA1, and E6TP1/SIPA1L1. Several lines of evidence suggest that RapGAPs function as tumor and/or invasion suppressors. Downregulation of E6TP1 by human papillomavirus protein E6 contributes to cervical cancer (20, 21), and Spa-1 deficiency in mice induces a spectrum of myelodysplastic disorders similar to chronic myelogenous leukemia (26). The SPA1 gene was identified as a candidate for the metastasis efficiency modifier locus in mice (38). Although the relevance of this observation to humans is not yet clear, single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the SPA1 gene in human breast tumors have been associated with lymph node involvement and poor survival (15). Intriguingly, Spa-1 interacts with Brd4 (18) and Rrp-1b (13), the protein products of genes associated with patterns of extracellular matrix protein gene expression characteristic of metastatic tumors (14).The RAP1GAP gene maps to 1p35-36, a chromosomal region subject to copy number alterations in human tumors (36, 49). Rap1GAP protein levels are decreased in pancreatic adenocarcinomas (53), papillary thyroid carcinomas (37, 47, 57), and melanomas (56). Rap1GAP downregulation has been shown to arise as a consequence of proteasomal degradation (46), loss of heterozygosity (37, 53), and promoter methylation (56, 57). Mutations of unknown significance in RAP1GAP have been identified in breast cancer (42). Although downregulation of Rap1GAP is frequent in human tumors, the functional significance of decreased Rap1GAP expression is unknown. Up to now, studies assessing the role of Rap1GAP in tumor cells have relied exclusively on overexpression experiments. Overexpression of Rap1GAP in oropharyngeal squamous cell (54) and pancreatic (53) carcinoma lines impaired tumor formation in mouse xenograft models. In vitro, overexpression of Rap1GAP impaired tumor cell proliferation (34, 47, 53, 54, 56) and enhanced apoptosis (34, 53, 56). In some instances, overexpression of Rap1GAP inhibited tumor cell migration and invasion (3, 47, 53, 56), while in others, it enhanced invasion (34). While these studies provide insight into cellular processes that can be deregulated by overexpression, they do not assess the significance of depletion of endogenous Rap1GAP in human tumors.Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide. The majority of CRC deaths arise as a consequence of distant metastases, most frequently to the liver. While the genetic basis of CRC is well understood (19, 48), less is known about the events that trigger the transition to metastatic disease. We report that Rap1GAP is highly expressed in normal colonic epithelium and that its expression is profoundly decreased in primary colorectal carcinomas. As one strategy to assess the significance of Rap1GAP depletion, the expression of Rap1GAP was silenced in human colon carcinoma cells. Silencing of Rap1GAP induced marked increases in Rap1 and Rap2 activity, the first evidence that Rap1GAP is an essential negative regulator of Rap GTPases in colon cancer. Rap1 regulates inside-out signaling through integrins (reviewed in references 8, 9, and 11) and is a target of outside-in signaling via cadherins (reviewed in reference 30). Downregulation of Rap1GAP induced profound alterations in cell/matrix and cell/cell adhesion. Suppressing Rap1GAP expression enhanced adhesion and spreading on collagen. Unexpectedly, based on the role of Rap1 in promoting cell/cell adhesion, silencing of Rap1GAP impaired cell/cell adhesion. These findings demonstrate a requirement for regulated Rap activity in the maintenance of epithelial cell structure and demonstrate a heretofore unappreciated role for Rap1GAP in the regulation of cell/cell adhesion. As the dissemination of tumor cells requires the weakening of cell/cell adhesion and an enhanced ability to adhere to collagen-rich interstitial matrices, our studies identify a potential mechanism through which loss of Rap1GAP contributes to tumor progression.     

Direct Spatial Control of Epac1 by Cyclic AMP

Epac1 is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for the small G protein Rap and is directly activated by cyclic AMP (cAMP). Upon cAMP binding, Epac1 undergoes a conformational change that allows the interaction of its GEF domain with Rap, resulting in Rap activation and subsequent downstream effects, including integrin-mediated cell adhesion and cell-cell junction formation. Here, we report that cAMP also induces the translocation of Epac1 toward the plasma membrane. Combining high-resolution confocal fluorescence microscopy with total internal reflection fluorescence and fluorescent resonance energy transfer assays, we observed that Epac1 translocation is a rapid and reversible process. This dynamic redistribution of Epac1 requires both the cAMP-induced conformational change as well as the DEP domain. In line with its translocation, Epac1 activation induces Rap activation predominantly at the plasma membrane. We further show that the translocation of Epac1 enhances its ability to induce Rap-mediated cell adhesion. Thus, the regulation of Epac1-Rap signaling by cAMP includes both the release of Epac1 from autoinhibition and its recruitment to the plasma membrane.Cyclic AMP (cAMP) is an important second messenger that mediates many cellular hormone responses. It has become more and more appreciated that, along with the cAMP effector protein kinase A (PKA), Epac proteins also play pivotal roles in many cAMP-controlled processes, including insulin secretion (23, 39), cell adhesion (9, 17, 25, 49, 60), neurotransmitter release (22, 53, 63), heart function (13, 35, 54), and circadian rhythm (38). Epac1 and Epac2 are cAMP-dependent guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the small G proteins Rap1 and Rap2 (12, 24). They contain a regulatory region with one (Epac1) or two (Epac2) cAMP-binding domains, a Dishevelled, Egl-10, Pleckstrin (DEP) domain, and a catalytic region for GEF activity (11). The binding of cAMP is a prerequisite for catalytic activity in vitro and in vivo (11). Recently, the structures of both the inactive and active conformations of Epac2 were solved (51, 52). This revealed that in the inactive conformation, the regulatory region occludes the Rap binding site, which is relieved by a conformational change induced by cAMP binding.Like all G proteins of the Ras superfamily, Rap cycles between an inactive GDP-bound and active GTP-bound state in an equilibrium that is tightly regulated by specific GEFs and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). The GEF-induced dissociation of GDP results in the binding of the cellularly abundant GTP, whereas GAPs enhance the intrinsic GTPase activity of the G protein, thereby inducing the inactive GDP-bound state. Besides Epac, several other GEFs for Rap have been identified, including C3G, PDZ-GEF, and RasGRP, and these act downstream of different signaling pathways (7). Since Rap localizes to several membrane compartments, including the Golgi network, vesicular membranes, and the plasma membrane (PM) (2-4, 37, 42, 48), the spatial regulation of its activity is expected to be established by the differential distributions of its upstream GEFs, each activating distinct pools of Rap on specific intracellular locations.Similarly to Rap, Epac1 also is observed at many locations in the cell, including the cytosol, the nucleus, the nuclear envelope, endomembranes, and the PM (5, 11, 14, 21, 29, 47). These various locations may reflect the many different functions assigned to Epac1, such as the regulation of cell adhesion, cell junction formation, secretion, the regulation of DNA-dependent protein kinase by nuclear Epac1, and the regulation of the Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger NHE3 at the brush borders of kidney epithelium (19, 21, 26). Apparently, specific anchors are responsible for this spatial regulation of Epac1. Indeed, Epac1 was found to associate with phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) in a complex with mAKAP in cardiomyocytes (13), with MAP-LC bound to microtubules (62), and with Ezrin at the brush borders of polarized cells (M. Gloerich, J. Zhao, and J. L. Bos, unpublished data).In this study, we report the unexpected observation that, in addition to the temporal control of Epac1 activity, cAMP also induces the translocation of Epac1 toward the plasma membrane. Using confocal fluorescence microscopy, total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assays for high spatial and temporal resolution, we observed that the translocation of Epac1 is immediate and that Epac1 approaches the PM to within ∼7 nm. In line with this, Epac1-induced Rap activation was registered predominantly on this compartment. Epac1 translocation results directly from the cAMP-induced conformational change and depends on the integrity of its DEP domain. We further show that Epac1 translocation is a prerequisite for cAMP-induced Rap activation at the PM and enhances Rap-mediated cell adhesion. Thus, cAMP exerts dual regulation on Epac1 for the activation of Rap, controlling both its GEF activity and targeting to the PM.     

Spatial Regulation of Cyclic AMP-Epac1 Signaling in Cell Adhesion by ERM Proteins

Epac1 is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small G protein Rap and is involved in membrane-localized processes such as integrin-mediated cell adhesion and cell-cell junction formation. Cyclic AMP (cAMP) directly activates Epac1 by release of autoinhibition and in addition induces its translocation to the plasma membrane. Here, we show an additional mechanism of Epac1 recruitment, mediated by activated ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM) proteins. Epac1 directly binds with its N-terminal 49 amino acids to ERM proteins in their open conformation. Receptor-induced activation of ERM proteins results in increased binding of Epac1 and consequently the clustered localization of Epac1 at the plasma membrane. Deletion of the N terminus of Epac1, as well as disruption of the Epac1-ERM interaction by an interfering radixin mutant or small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated depletion of the ERM proteins, impairs Epac1-mediated cell adhesion. We conclude that ERM proteins are involved in the spatial regulation of Epac1 and cooperate with cAMP- and Rap-mediated signaling to regulate adhesion to the extracellular matrix.Cyclic AMP (cAMP) is a second messenger that relays a wide range of hormone responses. The discovery of Epac as a direct effector of cAMP (15, 29) has triggered the elucidation of many cAMP-regulated processes that could not be explained by the previously known effectors protein kinase A (PKA) and cyclic nucleotide-regulated ion channels (21). Both Epac family members, Epac1 and Epac2, act as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the small G proteins Rap1 and Rap2. Thereby, Epac functions in processes such as exocytosis (28, 48, 59), cell-cell junction formation (13, 20, 30, 53, 64), and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) adhesion (55). Adhesion to the ECM induced by Epac1 and Rap is mediated by actin-linked integrin molecules and is implicated in diverse biological processes such as homing of endothelial progenitor cells to ischemic tissue (9), remodeling of the vasculature (10, 36), and transendothelial migration of leukocytes (37, 60).Epac1 and Epac2 are multidomain proteins containing a C-terminal catalytic region, which consists of a CDC25 homology domain responsible for GEF activity, a Ras exchange motif (REM), which stabilizes the CDC25 homology domain, and a Ras association (RA) domain. In the autoinhibited state, the catalytic site is sterically covered by the N-terminal regulatory region, which harbors a DEP (Dishevelled, Egl-10, and pleckstrin) domain and one or two cyclic nucleotide-binding domains in Epac1 and Epac2, respectively. As demonstrated by the crystal structures of both active and inactive Epac2, autoinhibition is released by a conformational change induced by the binding of cAMP (56, 57).After its production at the plasma membrane (PM) by adenylate cylases, cAMP becomes compartmentalized due to local degradation by spatially restricted phosphodiesterases (1). Further compartmentalization of cAMP signaling is established by the confined targeting of the cAMP effector proteins. Numerous adaptor proteins that target PKA to distinct subcellular locations and mediate the assembly of large signaling complexes have been identified (3). Similarly, cAMP-Epac signaling appears to be spatially regulated by diverse anchoring mechanisms, which may reflect the many different functions assigned to Epac. For instance, the DNA damage-responsive kinase DNA-PK is regulated by nuclear Epac1 (26), whereas membrane recruitment by activated Ras is essential for the role of Epac2 in neurite outgrowth (34, 35). Recently, we reported that Epac1 translocates to the PM upon the binding of cAMP and that this translocation contributes to Rap-mediated cell-ECM adhesion (51). Although the anchor at the PM remains elusive, it has become clear that the cAMP-dependent translocation of Epac1 involves its DEP domain (amino acids 50 to 148) and requires the cAMP-induced conformation.In this study, we reveal an additional targeting mechanism of Epac1 by showing that its N terminus interacts with members of the ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM) family. ERM proteins show high sequence similarity and function as scaffolding proteins that link the actin cytoskeleton to the PM (18, 42, 47). Inactive ERM proteins reside in the cytoplasm in an autoinhibited state maintained by an intramolecular interaction between the N-terminal FERM (4.1 protein, ezrin, radixin, moesin) domain and the C-terminal actin binding domain (ABD). This autoinhibition is released by binding to phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂) and threonine phosphorylation of the ABD, which induce the open conformation of the protein (reviewed in reference 8). Several kinases have been implicated in phosphorylation of this threonine in the ABD, including protein kinase C α (PKC α), PKC θ, NIK, Mst4, and the Rho effector ROCK (2, 40, 46, 50, 61). Active ERM proteins directly link the actin cytoskeleton to the PM and allow the recruitment of multiple signaling proteins. In this manner, ERM proteins function in numerous processes, such as the formation of microvilli, adherens junction stabilization, and leukocyte polarization (12, 18, 42, 47). Here, we demonstrate that ERM proteins also function as PM anchors for Epac1. The underlying interaction is mediated by the N terminus (residues 1 to 49) of Epac1 and is independent of its conformational state. Instead, the interaction is regulated at the level of the ERM proteins, which bind Epac1 when they are in their active, open conformation. G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signaling that results in activation of ERM proteins increases binding of Epac1 and results in a clustered localization of Epac1 at the PM. Together with DEP domain-mediated PM translocation, ERM proteins control cell adhesion mediated by Epac1. In conclusion, our data show that ERM proteins mediate PM recruitment of Epac1 and couple Epac1 activity to integrin-mediated cell adhesion.     

mTORC1-Activated S6K1 Phosphorylates Rictor on Threonine 1135 and Regulates mTORC2 Signaling

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a conserved Ser/Thr kinase that forms two functionally distinct complexes important for nutrient and growth factor signaling. While mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) regulates mRNA translation and ribosome biogenesis, mTORC2 plays an important role in the phosphorylation and subsequent activation of Akt. Interestingly, mTORC1 negatively regulates Akt activation, but whether mTORC1 signaling directly targets mTORC2 remains unknown. Here we show that growth factors promote the phosphorylation of Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), an essential subunit of mTORC2. We found that Rictor phosphorylation requires mTORC1 activity and, more specifically, the p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1). We identified several phosphorylation sites in Rictor and found that Thr1135 is directly phosphorylated by S6K1 in vitro and in vivo, in a rapamycin-sensitive manner. Phosphorylation of Rictor on Thr1135 did not affect mTORC2 assembly, kinase activity, or cellular localization. However, cells expressing a Rictor T1135A mutant were found to have increased mTORC2-dependent phosphorylation of Akt. In addition, phosphorylation of the Akt substrates FoxO1/3a and glycogen synthase kinase 3α/β (GSK3α/β) was found to be increased in these cells, indicating that S6K1-mediated phosphorylation of Rictor inhibits mTORC2 and Akt signaling. Together, our results uncover a new regulatory link between the two mTOR complexes, whereby Rictor integrates mTORC1-dependent signaling.The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an evolutionarily conserved phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-related Ser/Thr kinase that integrates signals from nutrients, energy sufficiency, and growth factors to regulate cell growth as well as organ and body size in a variety of organisms (reviewed in references 4, 38, 49, and 77). mTOR was discovered as the molecular target of rapamycin, an antifungal agent used clinically as an immunosuppressant and more recently as an anticancer drug (5, 20). Recent evidence indicates that deregulation of the mTOR pathway occurs in a majority of human cancers (12, 18, 25, 46), suggesting that rapamycin analogs may be potent antineoplastic therapeutic agents.mTOR forms two distinct multiprotein complexes, the rapamycin-sensitive and -insensitive mTOR complexes 1 and 2 (mTORC1 and mTORC2), respectively (6, 47). In cells, rapamycin interacts with FKBP12 and targets the FKBP12-rapamycin binding (FRB) domain of mTORC1, thereby inhibiting some of its function (13, 40, 66). mTORC1 is comprised of the mTOR catalytic subunit and four associated proteins, Raptor (regulatory associated protein of mTOR), mLST8 (mammalian lethal with sec13 protein 8), PRAS40 (proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa), and Deptor (28, 43, 44, 47, 59, 73, 74). The small GTPase Rheb (Ras homolog enriched in brain) is a key upstream activator of mTORC1 that is negatively regulated by the tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (TSC1)/TSC2 GTPase-activating protein complex (reviewed in reference 35). mTORC1 is activated by PI3K and Ras signaling through direct phosphorylation and inactivation of TSC2 by Akt, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and p90 ribosomal protein S6 kinase (RSK) (11, 37, 48, 53, 63). mTORC1 activity is also regulated at the level of Raptor. Whereas low cellular energy levels negatively regulate mTORC1 activity through phosphorylation of Raptor by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (27), growth signaling pathways activating the Ras/ERK pathway positively regulate mTORC1 activity through direct phosphorylation of Raptor by RSK (10). More recent evidence has also shown that mTOR itself positively regulates mTORC1 activity by directly phosphorylating Raptor at proline-directed sites (20a, 75). Countertransport of amino acids (55) and amino acid signaling through the Rag GTPases were also shown to regulate mTORC1 activity (45, 65). When activated, mTORC1 phosphorylates two main regulators of mRNA translation and ribosome biogenesis, the AGC (protein kinase A, G, and C) family kinase p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), and thus stimulates protein synthesis and cellular growth (50, 60).The second mTOR complex, mTORC2, is comprised of mTOR, Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), mSin1 (mammalian stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase-interacting protein 1), mLST8, PRR5 (proline-rich region 5), and Deptor (21, 39, 58, 59, 66, 76, 79). Rapamycin does not directly target and inhibit mTORC2, but long-term treatment with this drug was shown to correlate with mTORC2 disassembly and cytoplasmic accumulation of Rictor (21, 39, 62, 79). Whereas mTORC1 regulates hydrophobic motif phosphorylation of S6K1, mTORC2 has been shown to phosphorylate other members of the AGC family of kinases. Biochemical and genetic evidence has demonstrated that mTORC2 phosphorylates Akt at Ser473 (26, 39, 68, 70), thereby contributing to growth factor-mediated Akt activation (6, 7, 52). Deletion or knockdown of the mTORC2 components mTOR, Rictor, mSin1, and mLST8 has a dramatic effect on mTORC2 assembly and Akt phosphorylation at Ser473 (26, 39, 79). mTORC2 was also shown to regulate protein kinase Cα (PKCα) (26, 66) and, more recently, serum- and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase 1 (SGK1) (4, 22). Recent evidence implicates mTORC2 in the regulation of Akt and PKCα phosphorylation at their turn motifs (19, 36), but whether mTOR directly phosphorylates these sites remains a subject of debate (4).Activation of mTORC1 has been shown to negatively regulate Akt phosphorylation in response to insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) (reviewed in references 30 and 51). This negative regulation is particularly evident in cell culture models with defects in the TSC1/TSC2 complex, where mTORC1 and S6K1 are constitutively activated. Phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) by mTORC1 (72) and its downstream target S6K1 has been shown to decrease its stability and lead to an inability of insulin or IGF1 to activate PI3K and Akt (29, 69). Although the mechanism is unknown, platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGF-Rβ) has been found to be downregulated in TSC1- and TSC2-deficient murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), contributing to a reduction of PI3K signaling (80). Interestingly, inhibition of Akt phosphorylation by mTORC1 has also been observed in the presence of growth factors other than IGF-1, insulin, or PDGF, suggesting that there are other mechanisms by which mTORC1 activation restricts Akt activity in cells (reviewed in references 6 and 31). Recent evidence demonstrates that rapamycin treatment causes a significant increase in Rictor electrophoretic mobility (2, 62), suggesting that phosphorylation of the mTORC2 subunit Rictor may be regulated by mTORC1 or downstream protein kinases.Herein, we demonstrate that Rictor is phosphorylated by S6K1 in response to mTORC1 activation. We demonstrate that Thr1135 is directly phosphorylated by S6K1 and found that a Rictor mutant lacking this phosphorylation site increases Akt phosphorylation induced by growth factor stimulation. Cells expressing the Rictor T1135A mutant were found to have increased Akt signaling to its substrates compared to Rictor wild-type- and T1135D mutant-expressing cells. Together, our results suggest that Rictor integrates mTORC1 signaling via its phosphorylation by S6K1, resulting in the inhibition of mTORC2 and Akt signaling.     

Caveolin-1 Modulates HIV-1 Envelope-Induced Bystander Apoptosis through gp41

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) envelope (Env)-mediated bystander apoptosis is known to cause the progressive, severe, and irreversible loss of CD4⁺ T cells in HIV-1-infected patients. Env-induced bystander apoptosis has been shown to be gp41 dependent and related to the membrane hemifusion between envelope-expressing cells and target cells. Caveolin-1 (Cav-1), the scaffold protein of specific membrane lipid rafts called caveolae, has been reported to interact with gp41. However, the underlying pathological or physiological meaning of this robust interaction remains unclear. In this report, we examine the interaction of cellular Cav-1 and HIV gp41 within the lipid rafts and show that Cav-1 modulates Env-induced bystander apoptosis through interactions with gp41 in SupT1 cells and CD4⁺ T lymphocytes isolated from human peripheral blood. Cav-1 significantly suppressed Env-induced membrane hemifusion and caspase-3 activation and augmented Hsp70 upregulation. Moreover, a peptide containing the Cav-1 scaffold domain sequence markedly inhibited bystander apoptosis and apoptotic signal pathways. Our studies shed new light on the potential role of Cav-1 in limiting HIV pathogenesis and the development of a novel therapeutic strategy in treating HIV-1-infected patients.HIV infection causes a progressive, severe, and irreversible depletion of CD4⁺ T cells, which is responsible for the development of AIDS (9). The mechanism through which HIV infection induces cell death involves a variety of processes (58). Among these processes, apoptosis is most likely responsible for T-cell destruction in HIV-infected patients (33), because active antiretroviral therapy has been associated with low levels of CD4⁺ T-cell apoptosis (7), and AIDS progression was shown previously to correlate with the extent of immune cell apoptosis (34). Importantly, bystander apoptosis of uninfected cells was demonstrated to be one of the major processes involved in the destruction of immune cells (58), with the majority of apoptotic CD4⁺ T cells in the peripheral blood and lymph nodes being uninfected in HIV patients (22).Binding to uninfected cells or the entry of viral proteins released by infected cells is responsible for the virus-mediated killing of innocent-bystander CD4⁺ T cells (2-4, 9, 65). The HIV envelope glycoprotein complex, consisting of gp120 and gp41 subunits expressed on an HIV-infected cell membrane (73), is believed to induce bystander CD4⁺ T-cell apoptosis (58). Although there is a soluble form of gp120 in the blood, there is no conclusive agreement as to whether the concentration is sufficient to trigger apoptosis (57, 58). The initial step in HIV infection is mediated by the Env glycoprotein gp120 binding with high affinity to CD4, the primary receptor on the target cell surface, which is followed by interactions with the chemokine receptor CCR5 or CXCR4 (61). This interaction triggers a conformational change in gp41 and the insertion of its N-terminal fusion peptide into the target membrane (30). Next, a prehairpin structure containing leucine zipper-like motifs is formed by the two conserved coiled-coil domains, called the N-terminal and C-terminal heptad repeats (28, 66, 70). This structure quickly collapses into a highly stable six-helix bundle structure with an N-terminal heptad repeat inside and a hydrophobic C-terminal heptad repeat outside (28, 66, 70). The formation of the six-helix bundle leads to a juxtaposition and fusion with the target cell membrane (28, 66, 70). The fusogenic potential of HIV Env is proven to correlate with the pathogenesis of both CXCR4- and CCR5-tropic viruses by not only delivering the viral genome to uninfected cells but also mediating Env-induced bystander apoptosis (71). Initial infection is dominated by the CCR5-tropic strains, with the CXCR4-tropic viruses emerging in the later stages of disease (20). Studies have shown that CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 triggers more depletion of CD4⁺ T cells than CCR5-tropic strains (36).Glycolipid- and cholesterol-enriched membrane microdomains, termed lipid rafts, are spatially organized plasma membranes and are known to have many diverse functions (26, 53). These functions include membrane trafficking, endocytosis, the regulation of cholesterol and calcium homeostasis, and signal transduction in cellular growth and apoptosis. Lipid rafts have also been implicated in HIV cell entry and budding processes (19, 46, 48, 51). One such organelle is the caveola, which is a small, flask-shaped (50 to 100 nm in diameter) invagination in the plasma membrane (5, 62). The caveola structure, which is composed of proteins known as caveolins, plays a role in various functions by serving as a mobile platform for many receptors and signal proteins (5, 62). Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) is a 22- to 24-kDa major coat protein responsible for caveola assembly (25, 47). This scaffolding protein forms a hairpin-like structure and exists as an oligomeric complex of 14 to 16 monomers (21). Cav-1 has been shown to be expressed by a variety of cell types, mostly endothelial cells, type I pneumocytes, fibroblasts, and adipocytes (5, 62). In addition, Cav-1 expression is evident in immune cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells (38, 39). However, Cav-1 is not expressed in isolated thymocytes (49). Furthermore, Cav-1 and caveolar structures are absent in human or murine T-cell lines (27, 41, 68). Contrary to this, there has been one report showing evidence of Cav-1 expression in bovine primary cell subpopulations of CD4⁺, CD8⁺, CD21⁺, and IgM⁺ cells with Cav-1 localized predominantly in the perinuclear region (38). That report also demonstrated a membrane region staining with Cav-1-specific antibody of human CD21⁺ and CD26⁺ peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs). Recently, the expression of Cav-1 in activated murine B cells, with a potential role in the development of a thymus-independent immune response, was also reported (56). It remains to be determined whether Cav-1 expression is dependent on the activation state of lymphocytes. For macrophages, however, which are one of the main cell targets for HIV infection, Cav-1 expression has been clearly documented (38).The scaffolding domain of Cav-1, located in the juxtamembranous region of the N terminus, is responsible for its oligomerization and binding to various proteins (5, 62, 64). It recognizes a consensus binding motif, ΦXΦXXXXΦ, ΦXXXXΦXXΦ, or ΦXΦXXXXΦXXΦ, where Φ indicates an aromatic residue (F, W, or Y) and X indicates any residue (5, 62, 64). A Cav-1 binding motif (WNNMTWMQW) has been identified in the HIV-1 envelope protein gp41 (42, 43). Cav-1 has been shown to associate with gp41 by many different groups under various circumstances, including the immunoprecipitation of gp41 and Cav-1 in HIV-infected cells (42, 43, 52). However, the underlying pathological or physiological functions of this robust interaction between Cav-1 and gp41 remain unclear.Here, we report that the interaction between Cav-1 and gp41 leads to a modification of gp41 function, which subsequently regulates Env-induced T-cell bystander apoptosis. Moreover, we show that a peptide containing the Cav-1 scaffold domain sequence is capable of modulating Env-induced bystander apoptosis, which suggests a novel therapeutic application for HIV-1-infected patients.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Ral Overactivation in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors

Ras leads an important signaling pathway that is deregulated in neurofibromatosis type 1 and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). In this study, we show that overactivation of Ras and many of its downstream effectors occurred in only a fraction of MPNST cell lines. RalA, however, was overactivated in all MPNST cells and tumor samples compared to nontransformed Schwann cells. Silencing Ral or inhibiting it with a dominant-negative Ral (Ral S28N) caused a significant reduction in proliferation, invasiveness, and in vivo tumorigenicity of MPNST cells. Silencing Ral also reduced the expression of epithelial mesenchymal transition markers. Expression of the NF1-GTPase-related domain (NF1-GRD) diminished the levels of Ral activation, implicating a role for neurofibromin in regulating RalA activation. NF1-GRD treatment caused a significant decrease in proliferation, invasiveness, and cell cycle progression, but cell death increased. We propose Ral overactivation as a novel cell signaling abnormality in MPNST that leads to important biological outcomes with translational ramifications.The Ras family of guanine-nucleotide bound proteins exerts a fundamental role in cell biology and constitutes an important area of cancer research due to its significant involvement in the development and progression of malignancies (8, 10, 17, 18, 32). Ras-like (Ral) proteins are crucial members of this family and have been shown to play a pivotal role in human tumors (7, 28, 41, 66, 70). Because Ral guanine nucleotide exchange factors (Ral-GEFs) are direct effectors of Ras, the Ral signaling pathway has been traditionally considered a Ras-effector pathway. Activation of Ras (in resemblance to Ral) is regulated by two classes of proteins: Ras-GEFs (e.g., SOS) and Ras- GTPase activating proteins (Ras-GAPs such as neurofibromin). The latter induces hydrolysis of Ras from the active (GTP) form to the inactive (GDP) form (13). Ral-GEFs include two main groups: the proteins that are stimulated by Ras because of their carboxy-terminal Ras binding domain (RalGDS, RGL1, and RGL2) and the proteins that are activated by substrates of PI3K through a pleckstrin homology domain on their C-terminal (RALGPS1 and RALGPS2) (19). Although highly similar to Ras, Ral proteins (RalA and RalB) involve a series of distinctly different effectors that influence gene expression and translation through interaction with ZO-1-associated nucleic acid binding protein (ZONAB) and RalA binding protein 1 (RalBP1) (11, 23, 33). RalB directly interacts with the SEC5 subunit of exocyst to facilitate the host defense response (48, 58).In addition to overactivation of GEFs, inactivation of GAPs is another mechanism for overactivation of GTP-bound proteins. The lack of neurofibromin (encoded by NF1 on human chromosome 17q11.2), a Ras-GAP protein, is the main molecular event in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1), an autosomal-dominant human genetic disease occurring in approximately 1 in 2,500 to 3,500 births (22, 27, 42). One of the main tumor-causing effects of inactivating mutations in the tumor suppressor NF1 gene is postulated to be the subsequent activation of Ras (3, 29, 53, 57, 69). With two main functional domains, SEC14 and Ras-GAP, neurofibromin is best known for its Ras-GAP function. Although the yeast SEC14p is shown to be involved in regulating intracellular proteins and lipid trafficking, the function of its homologous domain in neurofibromin is unknown (49, 62). Although neurofibromas are the most common tumors in NF-1, 10% of patients with plexiform develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), which are typically high grade and often fatal (21, 34, 65).The molecular events involved in the malignant transformation of benign neurofibromas to MPNST are poorly defined. Usually arising in the third through sixth decades of life, these tumors are composed of tightly packed hyperchromatic spindle-shaped cells with frequent mitotic figures. Inactivation of both copies of the NF1 gene has been demonstrated in benign human neurofibromas and shown to cause tumors in murine models (56). Loss of heterozygosity of NF1 and p53 has frequently been observed in human MPNST (35, 47, 54). Recombinant mouse strains (NP mice), which harbor inactivated Nf1 and p53 alleles (cis-Nf1^+/−:p53^+/−), demonstrate the cumulative effects of loss of both Nf1 and p53 genes in the etiology of MPNST (14, 68).In the present study, we show that while both Ras activation and activation of a series of its downstream effector pathways are observed in a fraction of MPNST cells, RalA is activated globally in all studied mouse and human MPNST cells and tumor samples. Our results also explain the involvement of this signaling molecule in a series of key biological functions of MPNST cells, as shown in a variety of in vitro assays and an in vivo model of MPNST. Such information may play a role in designing novel therapies for treatment of MPNST or other tumors with overactivation of the Ral pathway.     

The Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Scaffold KSR1 Is Required for Recruitment of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase to the Immunological Synapse

KSR1 is a mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase scaffold that enhances the activation of the MAP kinase extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). The function of KSR1 in NK cell function is not known. Here we show that KSR1 is required for efficient NK-mediated cytolysis and polarization of cytolytic granules. Single-cell analysis showed that ERK is activated in an all-or-none fashion in both wild-type and KSR1-deficient cells. In the absence of KSR1, however, the efficiency of ERK activation is attenuated. Imaging studies showed that KSR1 is recruited to the immunological synapse during T-cell activation and that membrane recruitment of KSR1 is required for recruitment of active ERK to the synapse.Kinase suppressor of Ras was originally identified in Drosophila melanogaster (53) and Caenorhabditis elegans (19, 32, 52) as a positive regulator of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathway. It is thought to function as a MAP kinase scaffold because it can bind to Raf, MEK, and ERK (18, 19, 27, 28, 44, 59). While the exact function of KSR is unknown, preassembling the three components of the ERK MAP kinase cascade could function to enhance the efficiency of ERK activation, potentially regulate the subcellular location of ERK activation, and promote access to specific subcellular substrates (16, 45, 46).While only one isoform of KSR is expressed in Drosophila (53), two KSR isoforms have been identified in C. elegans (19, 32, 52) and most higher organisms. They are referred to as KSR1 and KSR2 (32, 43). While KSR1 mRNA and protein are detectable in a wide variety of cells and tissues, including brain, thymus, and muscle (10, 11, 29), little is known about the expression pattern of KSR2.We previously reported the phenotype of KSR1-deficient mice (30). These mice are born at Mendelian ratios and develop without any obvious defects. Using gel filtration, we showed that KSR1 promotes the formation of large signaling complexes containing KSR1, Raf, MEK, and ERK (30). Using both primary T cells stimulated with antibodies to the T-cell receptor as well as fibroblasts stimulated with growth factors, we showed that KSR1-deficient cells exhibit an attenuation of ERK activation with defects in cell proliferation.Here we explored the role of KSR1 in NK cell-mediated cytolysis. The killing of a target cell by a cytolytic T cell or NK cell is a complicated process that involves cell polarization with microtubule-dependent movement of cytolytic granules to an area that is proximal to the contact surface or immunological synapse (7, 33, 34, 48-50, 54). A variety of different signaling molecules are also involved, including calcium (23), phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate (13, 17), and activation of the ERK MAP kinase (6, 42, 56). Recently, the recruitment of activated ERK to the immunological synapse (IS) has been shown to be a feature of successful killing of a target by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (58).How active ERK is recruited to the synapse is not known. Since KSR1 is known to be recruited to the plasma membrane by Ras activation (24), and since the immunological synapse is one of the major sites of Ras activation (26, 41), it seemed plausible to test the hypothesis that KSR1 recruitment to the plasma membrane functions to recruit ERK to the immunological synapse and facilitate its activation. We found that KSR1 was recruited to the immunological synapse and that KSR1 appeared to be required for the localization of active ERK at the contact site. As KSR1-deficient cells exhibit a defect in killing, this suggests that KSR1 recruitment to the synapse may be important in the cytolytic killing of target cells.     

Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Viremia and Provirus in Resting CD4+ T Cells Reveals a Novel Source of Residual Viremia in Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) can reduce human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viremia to clinically undetectable levels. Despite this dramatic reduction, some virus is present in the blood. In addition, a long-lived latent reservoir for HIV-1 exists in resting memory CD4⁺ T cells. This reservoir is believed to be a source of the residual viremia and is the focus of eradication efforts. Here, we use two measures of population structure—analysis of molecular variance and the Slatkin-Maddison test—to demonstrate that the residual viremia is genetically distinct from proviruses in resting CD4⁺ T cells but that proviruses in resting and activated CD4⁺ T cells belong to a single population. Residual viremia is genetically distinct from proviruses in activated CD4⁺ T cells, monocytes, and unfractionated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The finding that some of the residual viremia in patients on HAART stems from an unidentified cellular source other than CD4⁺ T cells has implications for eradication efforts.Successful treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) reduces free virus in the blood to levels undetectable by the most sensitive clinical assays (18, 36). However, HIV-1 persists as a latent provirus in resting, memory CD4⁺ T lymphocytes (6, 9, 12, 16, 48) and perhaps in other cell types (45, 52). The latent reservoir in resting CD4⁺ T cells represents a barrier to eradication because of its long half-life (15, 37, 40-42) and because specifically targeting and purging this reservoir is inherently difficult (8, 25, 27).In addition to the latent reservoir in resting CD4⁺ T cells, patients on HAART also have a low amount of free virus in the plasma, typically at levels below the limit of detection of current clinical assays (13, 19, 35, 37). Because free virus has a short half-life (20, 47), residual viremia is indicative of active virus production. The continued presence of free virus in the plasma of patients on HAART indicates either ongoing replication (10, 13, 17, 19), release of virus after reactivation of latently infected CD4⁺ T cells (22, 24, 31, 50), release from other cellular reservoirs (7, 45, 52), or some combination of these mechanisms. Finding the cellular source of residual viremia is important because it will identify the cells that are still capable of producing virus in patients on HAART, cells that must be targeted in any eradication effort.Detailed analysis of this residual viremia has been hindered by technical challenges involved in working with very low concentrations of virus (13, 19, 35). Recently, new insights into the nature of residual viremia have been obtained through intensive patient sampling and enhanced ultrasensitive sequencing methods (1). In a subset of patients, most of the residual viremia consisted of a small number of viral clones (1, 46) produced by a cell type severely underrepresented in the peripheral circulation (1). These unique viral clones, termed predominant plasma clones (PPCs), persist unchanged for extended periods of time (1). The persistence of PPCs indicates that in some patients there may be another major cellular source of residual viremia (1). However, PPCs were observed in a small group of patients who started HAART with very low CD4 counts, and it has been unclear whether the PPC phenomenon extends beyond this group of patients. More importantly, it has been unclear whether the residual viremia generally consists of distinct virus populations produced by different cell types.Since the HIV-1 infection in most patients is initially established by a single viral clone (23, 51), with subsequent diversification (29), the presence of genetically distinct populations of virus in a single individual can reflect entry of viruses into compartments where replication occurs with limited subsequent intercompartmental mixing (32). Sophisticated genetic tests can detect such population structure in a sample of viral sequences (4, 39, 49). Using two complementary tests of population structure (14, 43), we analyzed viral sequences from multiple sources within individual patients in order to determine whether a source other than circulating resting CD4⁺ T cells contributes to residual viremia and viral persistence. Our results have important clinical implications for understanding HIV-1 persistence and treatment failure and for improving eradication strategies, which are currently focusing only on the latent CD4⁺ T-cell reservoir.