The U1, U2 and U5 snRNAs crosslink to the 5' exon during yeast pre-mRNA splicing

Activation of pre-messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) splicing requires 5′ splice site recognition by U1 small nuclear RNA (snRNA), which is replaced by U5 and U6 snRNA. Here we use crosslinking to investigate snRNA interactions with the 5′ exon adjacent to the 5′ splice site, prior to the first step of splicing. U1 snRNA was found to interact with four different 5′ exon positions using one specific sequence adjacent to U1 snRNA helix 1. This novel interaction of U1 we propose occurs before U1-5′ splice site base pairing. In contrast, U5 snRNA interactions with the 5′ exon of the pre-mRNA progressively shift towards the 5′ end of U5 loop 1 as the crosslinking group is placed further from the 5′ splice site, with only interactions closest to the 5′ splice site persisting to the 5′ exon intermediate and the second step of splicing. A novel yeast U2 snRNA interaction with the 5′ exon was also identified, which is ATP dependent and requires U2-branchpoint interaction. This study provides insight into the nature and timing of snRNA interactions required for 5′ splice site recognition prior to the first step of pre-mRNA splicing.     

Genetic and functional interaction of evolutionarily conserved regions of the Prp18 protein and the U5 snRNA

Both the Prp18 protein and the U5 snRNA function in the second step of pre-mRNA splicing. We identified suppressors of mutant prp18 alleles in the gene for the U5 snRNA (SNR7). The suppressors' U5 snRNAs have either a U4-to-A or an A8-to-C mutation in the evolutionarily invariant loop 1 of U5. Suppression is specific for prp18 alleles that encode proteins with mutations in a highly conserved region of Prp18 which forms an unstructured loop in crystals of Prp18. The snr7 suppressors partly restored the pre-mRNA splicing activity that was lost in the prp18 mutants. The close functional relationship of Prp18 and U5 is emphasized by the finding that two snr7 alleles, U5A and U6A, are dominant synthetic lethal with prp18 alleles. Our results support the idea that Prp18 and the U5 snRNA act in concert during the second step of pre-mRNA splicing and suggest a model in which the conserved loop of Prp18 acts to stabilize the interaction of loop 1 of the U5 snRNA with the splicing intermediates.     

Mutations in U5 snRNA loop 1 influence the splicing of different genes in vivo

The U5 snRNA loop 1 is characterized by the conserved sequence G₁C₂C₃U₄U₅U₆Y₇A₈Y₉ and is essential for the alignment of exons during the second step of pre-mRNA splicing in Saccharo myces cerevisiae. Despite this sequence conservation the size, rather than sequence, of loop 1 is critical for exon alignment in vitro. To determine the in vivo requirements for U5 loop 1 a library of loop 1 sequences was transformed into a yeast strain where the endogenous U5 gene was deleted. Comparison of viable mutations in loop 1 revealed that position 6 was invariant and positions 5 and 7 displayed some sequence conservation. These data indicate positions 5, 6 and 7 in loop 1 are important for U5 function in vivo. A screen for mutations that suppress the temperature-sensitive phenotype of three loop 1 mutants produced eight intragenic suppressors all containing alterations in loop 1. Further analysis of these temperature-sensitive mutants revealed that each displayed distinct cell cycle arrest phenotypes and pre-mRNA splicing inhibition patterns. The cell cycle arrest is likely attributed to inefficient splicing of α-tubulin pre-mRNA in one mutant and actin pre-mRNA in another. These results suggest that various mutations in loop 1 may affect the splicing of different pre-mRNAs in vivo.     

Comprehensive in vivo RNA-binding site analyses reveal a role of Prp8 in spliceosomal assembly

Prp8 stands out among hundreds of splicing factors as a protein that is intimately involved in spliceosomal activation and the catalytic reaction. Here, we present the first comprehensive in vivo RNA footprints for Prp8 in budding yeast obtained using CLIP (cross-linking and immunoprecipitation)/CRAC (cross-linking and analyses of cDNAs) and next-generation DNA sequencing. These footprints encompass known direct Prp8-binding sites on U5, U6 snRNA and intron-containing pre-mRNAs identified using site-directed cross-linking with in vitro assembled small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) or spliceosome. Furthermore, our results revealed novel Prp8-binding sites on U1 and U2 snRNAs. We demonstrate that Prp8 directly cross-links with U2, U5 and U6 snRNAs and pre-mRNA in purified activated spliceosomes, placing Prp8 in position to bring the components of the active site together. In addition, disruption of the Prp8 and U1 snRNA interaction reduces tri-snRNP level in the spliceosome, suggesting a previously unknown role of Prp8 in spliceosomal assembly through its interaction with U1 snRNA.     

Functional interactions between Prp8, Prp18, Slu7, and U5 snRNA during the second step of pre-mRNA splicing

After the second transesterification step of pre-mRNA splicing, the Prp22 helicase catalyzes release of spliced mRNA by disrupting contacts in the spliceosome that likely involve Prp8. Mutations at Arg1753 in Prp8, which suppress helicase-defective prp22 mutants, elicit temperature-sensitive growth phenotypes, indicating that interactions in the spliceosome involving Prp8-R1753 might be broken prematurely at 37 degrees C. Here we report that mutations in loop I of the U5 snRNA or in Prp18 can suppress the temperature-sensitive prp8-R1753 mutants. The same gain-of-function PRP18 alleles can also alleviate the growth phenotypes of multiple slu7-ts mutants, indicating a functional link between Prp8 and the second step splicing factors Prp18 and Slu7. These findings, together with the demonstration that changes at Arg1753 in Prp8 impair step 2 of pre-mRNA splicing in vitro, are consistent with a model in which (1) Arg1753 plays a role in stabilizing U5/exon interactions prior to exon joining and (2) these contacts persist until they are broken by the helicase Prp22.     

Evidence for complex dynamics during U2 snRNP selection of the intron branchpoint

Splicing of pre-mRNA is initiated by binding of U1 to the 5′ splice site and of Msl5-Mud2 heterodimer to the branch site (BS). Subsequent binding of U2 displaces Msl5-Mud2 from the BS to form the prespliceosome, a step governing branchpoint selection and hence 3′ splice site choice, and linking splicing to myelodysplasia and many cancers in human. Two DEAD-box proteins, Prp5 and Sub2, are required for this step, but neither is stably associated with the pre-mRNA during the reaction. Using BS-mutated ACT1 pre-mRNA, we previously identified a splicing intermediate complex, FIC, which contains U2 and Prp5, but cannot bind the tri-snRNP. We show here that Msl5 remains associated with the upstream cryptic branch site (CBS) in the FIC, with U2 binding a few bases downstream of the BS. U2 mutants that restore U2-BS base pairing enable dissociation of Prp5 and allows splicing to proceed. The CBS is required for splicing rescue by compensatory U2 mutants, and for formation of FIC, demonstrating a role for Msl5 in directing U2 to the BS, and of U2-BS base pairing for release of Prp5 and Msl5-Mud2 to form the prespliceosome. Our results provide insights into how the prespliceosome may form in normal splicing reaction.     

A conditional U5 snRNA mutation affecting pre-mRNA splicing and nuclear pre-mRNA retention identifies SSD1/SRK1 as a general splicing mutant suppressor.

A combination of point mutations disrupting both stem 1 and stem 2 of U5 snRNA (U5AI) was found to confer a thermosensitive phenotype in vivo. In a strain expressing U5AI, pre-mRNA splicing was blocked before the first step through an inability of the mutant U5 snRNA to efficiently associate with the U4/U6 di-snRNP. Formation of early splicing complexes was not affected in extracts prepared from U5 snRNA mutant cells, while the capacity of these extracts to splice a pre-mRNA in vitro was greatly diminished. In addition, significant levels of a translation product derived from intron containing pre-mRNAs could be detected in vivo. The SSD1/SRK1 gene was identified as a multi-copy suppressor of the U5AI snRNA mutant. Single copy expression of SSD1/SRK1 was sufficient to suppress the thermosensitive phenotype, and high copy expression partially suppressed the splicing and U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP assembly pheno-types. SSD1/SRK1 also suppressed thermosensitive mutations in the Prp18p and U1-70K proteins, while inhibiting growth of the cold sensitive U1-4U snRNA mutant at 30 degrees C. Thus we have identified SSD1/SRK1 as a general suppressor of splicing mutants.     

Extended base pair complementarity between U1 snRNA and the 5' splice site does not inhibit splicing in higher eukaryotes, but rather increases 5' splice site recognition

Spliceosome formation is initiated by the recognition of the 5′ splice site through formation of an RNA duplex between the 5′ splice site and U1 snRNA. We have previously shown that RNA duplex formation between U1 snRNA and the 5′ splice site can protect pre-mRNAs from degradation prior to splicing. This initial RNA duplex must be disrupted to expose the 5′ splice site sequence for base pairing with U6 snRNA and to form the active spliceosome. Here, we investigated whether hyperstabilization of the U1 snRNA/5′ splice site duplex interferes with splicing efficiency in human cell lines or nuclear extracts. Unlike observations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we demonstrate that an extended U1 snRNA/5′ splice site interaction does not decrease splicing efficiency, but rather increases 5′ splice site recognition and exon inclusion. However, low complementarity of the 5′ splice site to U1 snRNA significantly increases exon skipping and RNA degradation. Although the splicing mechanisms are conserved between human and S.cerevisiae, these results demonstrate that distinct differences exist in the activation of the spliceosome.     

Interactions between highly conserved U2 small nuclear RNA structures and Prp5p, Prp9p, Prp11p, and Prp21p proteins are required to ensure integrity of the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Binding of U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) to the pre-mRNA is an early and important step in spliceosome assembly. We searched for evidence of cooperative function between yeast U2 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and several genetically identified splicing (Prp) proteins required for the first chemical step of splicing, using the phenotype of synthetic lethality. We constructed yeast strains with pairwise combinations of 28 different U2 alleles with 10 prp mutations and found lethal double-mutant combinations with prp5, -9, -11, and -21 but not with prp3, -4, -8, or -19. Many U2 mutations in highly conserved or invariant RNA structures show no phenotype in a wild-type PRP background but render mutant prp strains inviable, suggesting that the conserved but dispensable U2 elements are essential for efficient cooperative function with specific Prp proteins. Mutant U2 snRNA fails to accumulate in synthetic lethal strains, demonstrating that interaction between U2 RNA and these four Prp proteins contributes to U2 snRNP assembly or stability. Three of the proteins (Prp9p, Prp11p, and Prp21p) are associated with each other and pre-mRNA in U2-dependent splicing complexes in vitro and bind specifically to synthetic U2 snRNA added to crude splicing extracts depleted of endogenous U2 snRNPs. Taken together, the results suggest that Prp9p, -11p, and -21p are U2 snRNP proteins that interact with a structured region including U2 stem loop IIa and mediate the association of the U2 snRNP with pre-mRNA.     

Remodeling of U2-U6 snRNA helix I during pre-mRNA splicing by Prp16 and the NineTeen Complex protein Cwc2

Removal of intron regions from pre-messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) requires spliceosome assembly with pre-mRNA, then subsequent spliceosome remodeling to allow activation for the two steps of intron removal. Spliceosome remodeling is carried out through the action of DExD/H-box ATPases that modulate RNA–RNA and protein–RNA interactions. The ATPase Prp16 remodels the spliceosome between the first and second steps of splicing by catalyzing release of first step factors Yju2 and Cwc25 as well as destabilizing U2-U6 snRNA helix I. How Prp16 destabilizes U2-U6 helix I is not clear. We show that the NineTeen Complex (NTC) protein Cwc2 displays genetic interactions with the U6 ACAGAGA, the U6 internal stem loop (ISL) and the U2-U6 helix I, all RNA elements that form the spliceosome active site. We find that one function of Cwc2 is to stabilize U2-U6 snRNA helix I during splicing. Cwc2 also functionally cooperates with the NTC protein Isy1/NTC30. Mutation in Cwc2 can suppress the cold sensitive phenotype of the prp16-302 mutation indicating a functional link between Cwc2 and Prp16. Specifically the prp16-302 mutation in Prp16 stabilizes Cwc2 interactions with U6 snRNA and destabilizes Cwc2 interactions with pre-mRNA, indicating antagonistic functions of Cwc2 and Prp16. We propose that Cwc2 is a target for Prp16-mediated spliceosome remodeling during pre-mRNA splicing.     

Limited complementarity between U1 snRNA and a retroviral 5′ splice site permits its attenuation via RNA secondary structure

Multiple types of regulation are used by cells and viruses to control alternative splicing. In murine leukemia virus, accessibility of the 5′ splice site (ss) is regulated by an upstream region, which can fold into a complex RNA stem–loop structure. The underlying sequence of the structure itself is negligible, since most of it could be functionally replaced by a simple heterologous RNA stem–loop preserving the wild-type splicing pattern. Increasing the RNA duplex formation between U1 snRNA and the 5′ss by a compensatory mutation in position +6 led to enhanced splicing. Interestingly, this mutation affects splicing only in the context of the secondary structure, arguing for a dynamic interplay between structure and primary 5′ss sequence. The reduced 5′ss accessibility could also be counteracted by recruiting a splicing enhancer domain via a modified MS2 phage coat protein to a single binding site at the tip of the simple RNA stem–loop. The mechanism of 5′ss attenuation was revealed using hyperstable U1 snRNA mutants, showing that restricted U1 snRNP access is the cause of retroviral alternative splicing.     

U5 snRNA interacts with exon sequences at 5' and 3' splice sites.

U5 snRNA is an essential pre-mRNA splicing factor whose function remains enigmatic. Specific mutations in a conserved single-stranded loop sequence in yeast U5 snRNA can activate cleavage of G1----A mutant pre-mRNAs at aberrant 5' splice sites and facilitate processing of dead-end lariat intermediates to mRNA. Activation of aberrant 5' cleavage sites involves base pairing between U5 snRNA and nucleotides upstream of the cleavage site. Processing of dead-end lariat intermediates to mRNA correlates with base pairing between U5 and the first two bases in exon 2. The loop sequence in U5 snRNA may therefore by intimately involved in the transesterification reactions at 5' and 3' splice sites. This pattern of interactions is strikingly reminiscent of exon recognition events in group II self-splicing introns and is consistent with the notion that U5 snRNA may be related to a specific functional domain from a group II-like self-splicing ancestral intron.     

The Pre-mRNA 5′ Cap Determines Whether U6 Small Nuclear RNA Succeeds U1 Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Particle at 5′ Splice Sites

Efficient splicing of the 5′-most intron of pre-mRNA requires a 5′ m⁷G(5′)ppp(5′)N cap, which has been implicated in U1 snRNP binding to 5′ splice sites. We demonstrate that the cap alters the kinetic profile of U1 snRNP binding, but its major effect is on U6 snRNA binding. With two alternative wild-type splice sites in an adenovirus pre-mRNA, the cap selectively alters U1 snRNA binding at the site to which cap-independent U1 snRNP binding is stronger and that is used predominantly in splicing; with two consensus sites, the cap acts on both, even though one is substantially preferred for splicing. However, the most striking quantitative effect of the 5′ cap is neither on U1 snRNP binding nor on the assembly of large complexes but on the replacement of U1 snRNP by U6 snRNA at the 5′ splice site. Inhibition of splicing by a cap analogue is correlated with the loss of U6 interactions at the 5′ splice site and not with any loss of U1 snRNP binding.     

Trans-complementation of the second step of pre-mRNA splicing by exogenous 5' exons.

During splicing of nuclear pre-mRNAs, the first step liberates the 5' exon (exon 1) and yields a lariat intron-3'exon (intron-exon 2) intermediate. The second step results in exon ligation. Previous results indicated that severe truncations of the 5' exon of the actin pre-mRNA result in a block to the second splicing step in vitro in yeast extracts, leading to an accumulation of intron-exon 2 lariat intermediates. We show that exogenous exon 1 RNA oligonucleotides can chase these stalled intermediates into lariat intron and spliced exons. This reaction requires some of the cis elements and trans-acting factors that are required for a normal second step. There is no strong sequence requirement for the exon 1 added in trans, but oligonucleotides with complementarity to the U5 snRNA conserved loop perform the chase more efficiently. Using a dominant negative mutant of the DEAH-box ATPase Prp16p and ATP depletion, we show that the stalled intermediate is blocked after the Prp16p-dependent step. These results show that exogenous RNAs with various sequences but containing no splicing signals can be incorporated into spliceosomes and undergo RNA recombination and exon shuffling during the second step of pre-mRNA splicing.     

The yeast Prp3 protein is a U4/U6 snRNP protein necessary for integrity of the U4/U6 snRNP and the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP.

Previously, yeast prp3 mutants were found to be blocked prior to the first catalytic step of pre-mRNA splicing. No splicing intermediates or products are formed from pre-mRNA in heat-inactivated prp3 mutants or prp3 mutant extracts. Here we show that Prp3p is a component of the U4/U6 snRNP and is also present in the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP. Heat inactivation of prp3 extracts results in depletion of free U6 snRNPs and U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNPs, but not U4/U6 snRNPs or U5 snRNPs. Free U4 snRNP, normally not present in wild-type extracts, accumulates under these conditions. Assays of in vivo levels of snRNAs in a prp3 mutant revealed that amounts of free U6 snRNA decreased, free U4 snRNA increased, and U4/U6 hybrids decreased slightly. These results suggest that Prp3p is required for formation of stable U4/U6 snRNPs and for assembly of the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP from its component snRNPs. Upon inactivation of Prp3p, spliceosomes cannot assemble from prespliceosomes due to the absence of intact U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNPs. Prp3p is homologous to a human protein that is a component of U4/U6 snRNPs, exemplifying the conservation of splicing factors between yeast and metazoans.     

The U5 snRNA internal loop 1 is a platform for Brr2, Snu114 and Prp8 protein binding during U5 snRNP assembly

The U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP) forms the heart of the spliceosome which is required for intron removal from pre‐mRNA. The proteins Prp8, Snu114 and Brr2 all assemble with the U5 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) to produce the U5 snRNP. Successful assembly of the U5 snRNP, then incorporation of this snRNP into the U4/U6.U5 tri‐snRNP and the spliceosome, is essential for producing an active spliceosome. We have investigated the requirements for Prp8, Snu114 and Brr2 association with the U5 snRNA to form the U5 snRNP in yeast. Mutations were constructed in the highly conserved loop 1 and internal loop 1 (IL1) of the U5 snRNA and their function assessed in vivo. The influence of these U5 mutations on association of Prp8, Snu114 and Brr2 with the U5 snRNA were then determined. U5 snRNA loop 1 and both sides of IL1 in U5 were important for association of Prp8, Snu114 and Brr2 with the U5 snRNA. Mutations in the 3′ side of U5 IL1 resulted in the greatest reduction of Prp8, Snu114 and Brr2 association with the U5 snRNA. Genetic screening of brr2 and U5 snRNA mutants revealed synthetic lethal interactions between alleles in Brr2 and the 3′ side of U5 snRNA IL1 which reflects reduced association between Brr2 and U5 IL1. We propose that the U5 snRNA IL1 is a platform for protein binding and is required for Prp8, Brr2 and Snu114 association with the U5 snRNA to form the U5 snRNP. J. Cell. Biochem. 114: 2770–2784, 2013. © 2013 The Authors. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.     

Interactions of the yeast U6 RNA with the pre-mRNA branch site.

The small nuclear RNA (snRNA) components of the spliceosome have been proposed to catalyze the excision of introns from nuclear pre-mRNAs. If this hypothesis is correct, then the snRNA components of the spliceosome may interact directly with the reactive groups of pre-mRNA substrates. To explore this possibility, a genetic screen has been used to identify potential interactions between the U6 RNA and the pre-mRNA branch site. Notably, the selection yielded mutants in two regions of the yeast U6 RNA implicated previously in the catalytic events of splicing. These mutants significantly increase the splicing of pre-mRNA substrates containing non-adenosine branch sites. U6 mutants in U2/U6 helix Ia show strong allele-specific interactions with the branch site nucleotide and interact with PRP16, a factor implicated previously in branch site utilization. The other mutants cluster in the intramolecular helix of U6 and suppress the effects of branch site mutations in a nonallele-specific fashion. The locations of these mutants may define positions important for binding of the U6 intramolecular helix to the catalytic core of the spliceosome.