Genetic Features of Resident Biofilms Determine Attachment of Listeria monocytogenes

Planktonic Listeria monocytogenes cells in food-processing environments tend most frequently to adhere to solid surfaces. Under these conditions, they are likely to encounter resident biofilms rather than a raw solid surface. Although metabolic interactions between L. monocytogenes and resident microflora have been widely studied, little is known about the biofilm properties that influence the initial fixation of L. monocytogenes to the biofilm interface. To study these properties, we created a set of model resident Lactococcus lactis biofilms with various architectures, types of matrices, and individual cell surface properties. This was achieved using cell wall mutants that affect bacterial chain formation, exopolysaccharide (EPS) synthesis and surface hydrophobicity. The dynamics of the formation of these biofilm structures were analyzed in flow cell chambers using in situ time course confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging. All the L. lactis biofilms tested reduced the initial immobilization of L. monocytogenes compared to the glass substratum of the flow cell. Significant differences were seen in L. monocytogenes settlement as a function of the genetic background of resident lactococcal biofilm cells. In particular, biofilms of the L. lactis chain-forming mutant resulted in a marked increase in L. monocytogenes settlement, while biofilms of the EPS-secreting mutant efficiently prevented pathogen fixation. These results offer new insights into the role of resident biofilms in governing the settlement of pathogens on food chain surfaces and could be of relevance in the field of food safety controls.Listeria monocytogenes is a food pathogen that has been implicated in numerous food-borne disease outbreaks (5, 58). This organism is found not only in food products but also on surfaces in food-processing plants (18). It is well documented that L. monocytogenes is able to adhere and form persistent biofilms on a variety of solid materials, such as stainless steel, glass, or polymers (18, 48, 51, 52). However, in food-manufacturing plants (and particularly in fermented-food-processing environments), it is most likely that the first contact between a pathogen and a surface will concern a resident microbial biofilm covering the solid surface (10, 35, 46). In this context, such a resident biofilm may be regarded as a “conditioning film” that modifies the topographic and physicochemical characteristics of the surface and hence the adhesion capability of planktonic microorganisms coming into contact with this substratum (6).Once the pathogens are immobilized on the surface, interactions between the pathogens and their environment (physiological interactions with resident flora, nutrient availability, pH, water activity, temperature, and cleaning and disinfection procedures) govern the long-term settlement and persistence of the pathogens on the surface. Various studies have demonstrated the inhibition of L. monocytogenes development by natural “protective” biofilms (10, 66). Competition for nutrients has been demonstrated as a major mechanism underlying the inhibition of pathogen development (25, 27). The production of antimicrobial agents (bacteriocins, acids, and hydrogen peroxide) has also been reported as being of importance to such interactions (13, 20, 36). For example, Lactococcus lactis has been described as being exceptionally efficient in controlling the development of L. monocytogenes on food-processing surfaces by means of competitive exclusion (66) or bacteriocin production (35). It has been reported that treating a surface with a bacterial polysaccharide prevented the adhesion of different nosocomial pathogens (60). Furthermore, alginate-overexpressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms reduced the retention of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts (54). Other recent studies have shown that the composition and quantity of specific exopolysaccharides (EPS) in Pseudomonas biofilms can inhibit the fixation of Escherichia coli or Erwinia chrysanthemi planktonic cells in porous media (37, 38).The present study investigated those properties of resident biofilms that could affect the settlement of L. monocytogenes. L. lactis was used as a model resident biofilm strain, as this is widely used in dairy fermentations and its cell wall properties have been the subject of considerable study (22, 23). Cell wall mutants of L. lactis MG1363 were used to create a set of model biofilms that differed in terms of their architecture, EPS synthesis, and cell surface hydrophobicity. These biofilms were used to evaluate the attachment of fluorescent inert polystyrene microbeads and of two reference strains of L. monocytogenes (LO28 and EGDe) using in situ confocal fluorescence imaging.     

Identification and Typing of Lactococcus lactis by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry

Currently, the genus Lactococcus is classified into six species: Lactococcus chungangensis, L. garvieae, L. lactis, L. piscium, L. plantarum, and L. raffinolactis. Among these six species, L. lactis is especially important because of its use in the manufacture of probiotic dairy products. L. lactis consists of three subspecies: L. lactis subsp. cremoris, L. lactis subsp. hordniae, and L. lactis subsp. lactis. However, these subspecies have not yet been reliably discriminated. To date, mainly phenotypic identification has been used, with a few genotypic identifications. We discriminated species or subspecies in the genus Lactococcus not only by proteomics identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) but also by phenotypic and genotypic identification. The proteomics identification using differences in the mass spectra of ribosomal proteins was nearly identical to that by genotypic identification (i.e., by analyses of 16S rRNA and recA gene sequences and amplified fragment length polymorphism). The three ribosomal subunits 30S/L31, 50S/L31, and 50S/L35 were the best markers for discriminating L. lactis subsp. cremoris from L. lactis subsp. lactis. Proteomics identification using MALDI-TOF MS was therefore a powerful method for discriminating and identifying these bacteria. In addition, this method was faster and more reliable than others that we examined.Lactococci are lactic acid bacteria (LAB) that are important contributors to the production of fermented dairy products, and some species produce antimicrobial compounds. Most species in the genus Lactococcus have been isolated from food-related sources and plants and are generally regarded as safe. Probiotic foods use these LAB, and there have been various studies of the relationship between these foods and the maintenance of human intestinal health (32). Lactococcus was first established as a genus distinct from the genus Streptococcus in 1985 (29).Currently, six species and three subspecies in the genus Lactococcus have been validated. Lactococcus plantarum has been isolated mainly from plants; L. garvieae has been isolated from fish, animals, and milk, and L. piscium has been isolated from salmon. Lactococcus lactis is most commonly found in raw milk, cheese, and other dairy products; L. raffinolactis has been found in raw milk and cheese, and L. chunagangensis has been isolated from wastewater. Among the six species, L. lactis is considered one of the most important in food production because it is used to manufacture fermented milk, butter, and cheese. Because of this importance, the whole genomes of three strains of L. lactis—L. lactis subsp. cremoris SK11 (10), L. lactis subsp. cremoris MG 1363 (37), and L. lactis subsp. lactis IL1403 (2)—have been sequenced.Since L. lactis was first described by Orla-Jensen in 1919 (21), there have been various classifications. To date, L. lactis has been classified into three subspecies: L. lactis subsp. cremoris, L. lactis subsp. hordniae, and L. lactis subsp. lactis. However, this classification was based on only a few phenotypic characteristics and is considered imperfect because of its inherent disadvantages of sensitivity to culture conditions or bacterial growth phase. Discriminating between L. lactis subsp. cremoris and L. lactis subsp. lactis is particularly difficult but is very important in industrial applications, because the activities of the two subspecies in cheese manufacture differ. In addition, when newly isolated bacterial strains are registered in public culture collections, these strains have to be identified and discriminated at the subspecies level. Normally, these two subspecies are identified on the basis of the following phenotypic features: (i) the ability to ferment maltose and ribose, (ii) growth in 4% NaCl (pH 9.2) at 40°C, (iii) the ability to produce ammonia from arginine, and (iv) the presence of glutamate decarboxylase activity (18-20). However, determining the results of the phenotypic identification is difficult because they are sometimes ambiguous and time sensitive, as demonstrated by the sugar fermentation tests described below, which gave different results over time. In addition, the results of phenotypic identifications in previous reports were not identical each other (9, 28, 35).From an evolutionary viewpoint, it is reasonable to classify subspecies by using the divergence of housekeeping genes that are well preserved at the genus or species level. 16S rRNA gene sequencing is the most common technique currently used to identify species. At the subspecies level, however, 16S rRNA gene sequence identity is often very high, and these sequences therefore cannot be used for identification purposes (14, 24, 27, 36). Recently, for LAB, the partial sequences of the recA (recombinase A), pheS (phenylalanyl tRNA synthetase alpha subunit), and rpoA (DNA-directed RNA polymerase alpha chain) genes have been effectively used for species or subspecies identification (5, 7, 17), and the analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences in combination with housekeeping gene sequences has been used to identify subspecies.In recent years, a number of important experiments have used matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for rapid bacterial identification, including clostridia (15), LAB (34), Listeria (1), mycobacteria (12), salmonellae (6), viridans group streptococci (8), and other nonfermenting bacteria (16). In these studies, MALDI-TOF MS spectra were obtained from intact cells without biomarker purification or chromatographic separation. MALDI-TOF MS is a good tool for the analysis of biopolymers because of its soft ionization, and it plays a central role in proteomic research. Because of their simplicity, speed, and accuracy, MS methods have been successfully applied to biomarker discovery and the characterization of various bacterial agents. Although DNA sequencing is the current standard for molecular characterization of bacteria, molecular methods cannot be easily applied for rapid classification and identification.Our aim was to examine whether a proteomic approach using MALDI-TOF MS was effective for rapid bacterial identification, especially of two of the subspecies of L. lactis.     

The MG1363 and IL1403 Laboratory Strains of Lactococcus lactis and Several Dairy Strains Are Diploid

Bacteria are normally haploid, maintaining one copy of their genome in one circular chromosome. We have examined the cell cycle of laboratory strains of Lactococcus lactis, and, to our surprise, we found that some of these strains were born with two complete nonreplicating chromosomes. We determined the cellular content of DNA by flow cytometry and by radioactive labeling of the DNA. These strains thus fulfill the criterion of being diploid. Several dairy strains were also found to be diploid while a nondairy strain and several other dairy strains were haploid in slow-growing culture. The diploid and haploid strains differed in their sensitivity toward UV light, in their cell size, and in their D period, the period between termination of DNA replication and cell division.In contrast to higher eukaryotes, bacteria are haploid (6, 19); i.e., they store their genetic information in a single chromosome, which is then duplicated during the cell cycle. If the growth rate is sufficiently low, bacteria are born with a single copy of the chromosome, which will then be duplicated before the bacterium divides.There are a few reports about bacteria that have more than one genome per cell, i.e., that are polyploid. Deinococcus radiodurans has been shown to have 4 to 10 copies of its genome (13, 14). The diplococcal bacterium Neisseria gonorrhoeae was found to be diploid per coccal unit (31). Azotobacter vinelandii bacteria amplify the genome during growth in rich medium more than 40 times (20, 24, 27). The giant bacterium Epulopiscium fishelsoni has been shown to amplify its genome into a polytene chromosome of 3,000-fold ploidy (2). In addition, noncomplementing diploid bacteria have been isolated from protoplast fusions in Bacillus subtilis (11) and, as a result of zygogenesis, in Escherichia coli (10). A few other bacteria with two to six different chromosomes have been reported (15, 30).The normal cell cycle is divided into three periods: (i) the B period from cell division until initiation of replication, (ii) the C period in which the cell replicates its DNA, and (iii) the D period from termination of productive replication until cell division. The D period thus includes processes such as proofreading and deconcatenation. The B period is found only in cells whose generation times exceed the length of the combined C and D periods. If the generation times become shorter than the combined lengths of the C and D periods, then the initiations of replication move into previous cell cycles (16). Fast-growing bacteria will therefore have more than one ongoing round of DNA replication at the same time; they might have 4, 8, or even 16 origins of replication (4). Normal haploid cells are born with one chromosome, either replicating or nonreplicating, and always with one terminus of replication. Not until the replication has ended do the cells have two termini. If the D period becomes longer than the generation time, which happens at high growth rates, the cells will be born with two termini as a result of the overlapping cell cycles. Long D periods are discussed further in the Discussion.We have examined the cell cycle of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 in order to determine the cell cycle periods. To our surprise, we found that slow-growing cultures of these bacteria were born with two complete chromosomes, which were replicated into four chromosomes during the C period. This strain thus fulfills the criterion of being diploid without overlapping chromosomal replication cycles. Comparison with other L. lactis strains showed that both of the subspecies, L. lactis subsp. cremoris and L. lactis subsp. lactis, had members that were either diploid, like MG1363, or haploid, like most bacteria.     

Comparison of the Complete Genome Sequences of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis DSM 10140 and Bl-04

Bifidobacteria are important members of the human gut flora, especially in infants. Comparative genomic analysis of two Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strains revealed evolution by internal deletion of consecutive spacer-repeat units within a novel clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat locus, which represented the largest differential content between the two genomes. Additionally, 47 single nucleotide polymorphisms were identified, consisting primarily of nonsynonymous mutations, indicating positive selection and/or recent divergence. A particular nonsynonymous mutation in a putative glucose transporter was linked to a negative phenotypic effect on the ability of the variant to catabolize glucose, consistent with a modification in the predicted protein transmembrane topology. Comparative genome sequence analysis of three Bifidobacterium species provided a core genome set of 1,117 orthologs complemented by a pan-genome of 2,445 genes. The genome sequences of the intestinal bacterium B. animalis subsp. lactis provide insights into rapid genome evolution and the genetic basis for adaptation to the human gut environment, notably with regard to catabolism of dietary carbohydrates, resistance to bile and acid, and interaction with the intestinal epithelium. The high degree of genome conservation observed between the two strains in terms of size, organization, and sequence is indicative of a genomically monomorphic subspecies and explains the inability to differentiate the strains by standard techniques such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes are dominant microbial phyla widely distributed in diverse ecosystems on the planet (10, 13, 20, 23, 33, 40, 51). Metagenomic analyses of the microbial landscape inhabiting various mammalian environments, notably the human gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and skin, have specifically identified Actinobacteria as an important and occasionally dominant phylum (18, 21, 33). Among the members of the large, diverse, and dynamic microbial community residing in the human GIT, Bifidobacterium is a dominant genus considered beneficial to humans and includes probiotic strains (live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host) (11). The population of bifidobacteria in the human intestine varies over time. Following vaginal delivery, the GIT of healthy newborns is typically colonized by bifidobacteria, especially in breast-fed infants, during the first few days of life (12). Interindividual variation, however, is remarkable in the human infant intestinal flora (41), and dominant genera are not always consistent across metagenomic analyses of the human gut flora (18, 30, 33, 41). Over time, the infant intestinal ecosystem becomes more complex as the diet becomes more diverse, with bifidobacteria typically remaining dominant until weaning (30).Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis is a gram-positive lactic acid bacterium commonly found in the guts of healthy humans and has been identified in the infant gut biota, particularly in ileal, fecal, and mucosal samples (52, 56). Some strains of B. animalis subsp. lactis are able to survive in the GIT, to adhere to human epithelial cells in vitro, to modify fecal flora, to modulate the host immune response, or to prevent microbial gastroenteritis and colitis (4, 15, 20, 40, 52, 56). Additionally, B. animalis subsp. lactis has been reported to utilize nondigestible oligosaccharides, which may contribute to the organism''s ability to compete in the human gut. Carbohydrates resistant to enzymatic degradation and not absorbed in the upper intestinal tract are a primary source of energy for microbes residing in the large intestine. The benefits associated with probiotic strains of B. animalis subsp. lactis have resulted in their inclusion in the human diet via formulation into a large array of dietary supplements and foods, including dairy products such as yogurt. Deciphering the complete genome sequences of such microbes will provide additional insight into the genetic basis for survival and residence in the human gut, notably with regard to the ability to survive gastric passage and utilize available nutrients. Also, these genomes provide reference sequences for ongoing metagenomic analyses of the human environment, including the gut metagenome.Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis is the most common bifidobacterium utilized as a probiotic in commercial dairy products in North America and Europe (22, 38). However, despite this commercial and probiotic significance, strain-level differentiation of B. animalis subsp. lactis strains has been hindered by the high genetic similarity of these organisms, as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and other nucleic acid-based techniques (6, 55, 56), and the lack of available genomic sequence information. The genome sequence of strain BB-12 (17) is not currently publicly available, and only a draft genome sequence in 28 contigs is available for strain HN019 (GenBank project 28807). The complete B. animalis subsp. lactis genome for strain AD011 (28) was only recently (2009) published. While this was an important first step, a single genome does not allow identification of unique targets for strain differentiation or comparative analyses within the subspecies.The objectives of this study were to determine the complete genome sequences of two B. animalis subsp. lactis strains, the type strain and a widely used commercial strain, to provide insights into the functionality of this species and into species identification and strain specialization.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Characterization of a Novel LysM Domain from Lactobacillus fermentum Bacteriophage Endolysin and Its Use as an Anchor To Display Heterologous Proteins on the Surfaces of Lactic Acid Bacteria

The endolysin Lyb5, from Lactobacillus fermentum temperate bacteriophage φPYB5, showed a broad lytic spectrum against Gram-positive as well as Gram-negative bacteria. Sequence analysis revealed that the C terminus of the endolysin Lyb5 (Ly5C) contained three putative lysin motif (LysM) repeat regions, implying that Ly5C was involved in bacterial cell wall binding. To investigate the potential of Ly5C for surface display, green fluorescent protein (GFP) was fused to Ly5C at its N or C terminus and the resulting fusion proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli. After being mixed with various cells in vitro, GFP was successfully displayed on the surfaces of Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus casei, Lb. brevis, Lb. plantarum, Lb. fermentum, Lb. delbrueckii, Lb. helveticus, and Streptococcus thermophilus cells. Increases in the fluorescence intensities of chemically pretreated L. lactis and Lb. casei cells compared to those of nonpretreated cells suggested that the peptidoglycan was the binding ligand for Ly5C. Moreover, the pH and concentration of sodium chloride were optimized to enhance the binding capacity of GFP-Ly5C, and high-intensity fluorescence of cells was observed under optimal conditions. All results suggested that Ly5C was a novel anchor for constructing a surface display system for lactic acid bacteria (LAB). To demonstrate the applicability of the Ly5C-mediated surface display system, β-galactosidase (β-Gal) from Paenibacillus sp. strain K1, replacing GFP, was functionally displayed on the surfaces of LAB cells via Ly5C. The success in surface display of GFP and β-Gal opened up the feasibility of employing the cell wall anchor of bacteriophage endolysin for surface display in LAB.Surface display of heterologous proteins or peptides on bacteria is potentially important in several areas of biotechnology, including development of live vaccine delivery systems, diagnostics, whole-cell absorbents, and novel biocatalysts (11). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have the status of being generally recognized as safe (GRAS), making them certainly more useful in food and medical applications than other bacterial species. The development of cell surface display systems for LAB has recently become one of the most active research areas. Most of the cell surface display systems for LAB reported thus far have made use of the C terminus of a cell wall-anchoring protein via an LPXTG motif (8, 12, 19, 24). This anchoring mechanism requires processing by a sortase for covalent anchoring of the protein to the cell wall peptidoglycan (15). Various anchoring proteins, such as membrane-spanning protein PgsA (16) and S-layer protein (3), have also been exploited for surface display. However, heterologous proteins have been anchored to the producer cells, and the use of genetically modified organisms is less desirable or at least still being debated. Surface display of heterologous proteins on genetically unmodified Gram-positive bacteria has been successfully carried out using the peptidoglycan binding lysin motif (LysM) domain of the major autolysin AcmA of Lactococcus lactis (1, 2, 4, 18, 28).LysM was first discovered in the lysozyme of Bacillus phage φ29 as a C-terminal repeat composed of 44 amino acids separated by 7 amino acids (6). LysM is a common module found in more than 4,000 proteins of both prokaryotes and eukaryotes (6). Many bacterial proteins containing LysM are peptidoglycan hydrolases, such as p60 (20), Sep (26), LytF (31), AcmA (5), and Mur (7). The best-characterized LysM-containing protein is the N-acetylglucosaminidase AcmA of L. lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363. AcmA is the major autolysin and is required for cell separation and cell lysis during the stationary phase of L. lactis (5). It contains three domains: the N-terminal signal peptide, an active domain, and a C-terminal peptidoglycan anchor (cA) which consists of three LysM repeats (22). Several functional proteins, including malaria parasite surface antigen, β-lactamase, α-amylase, and viral capsid proteins, have been noncovalently bound to cell walls of AcmA-producing and non-AcmA-producing L. lactis as well as several other Gram-positive bacteria via cA (4, 17, 18, 23, 25).Endolysins from bacteriophages are cell wall hydrolases involved in cell lysis to release the progeny particles from the host cells (9, 30). Most endolysins lack a signal peptide and are translocated across the membrane by the aid of the holin protein. This protein typically contains an N-terminal catalytic domain and a C-terminal cell wall binding domain (33). The endolysins Ply118 and Ply500 of a Listeria monocytogenes phage share a unique C-terminal cell wall binding domain which establishes specific recognition of and high-affinity binding to bacterial cell wall carbohydrates (13). The temperate bacteriophage φPYB5, isolated from the Lactobacillus fermentum YB5 strain, has a hexagonal head, noncontractile tails, and several fibers and belongs to Bradley''s group B as defined by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (32). The sequence of the endolysin gene lyb5 from the genome of φPYB5 has been deposited in GenBank under accession number {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"EF531306","term_id":"145687952","term_text":"EF531306"}}EF531306, and the gene product has been successfully expressed in Escherichia coli and has shown a broad lytic spectrum (30).Here, we generated a fusion of green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the C terminus of Lyb5 (Ly5C) to construct a surface display system for LAB. The GFP was bound to the surfaces of various LAB cells by the aid of Ly5C. Moreover, by using the system constructed, β-galactosidase (β-Gal) was functionally displayed on the surfaces of LAB cells and retained its activity.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Roles of Minor Pilin Subunits Spy0125 and Spy0130 in the Serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes Strain SF370

Adhesive pili on the surface of the serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes strain SF370 are composed of a major backbone subunit (Spy0128) and two minor subunits (Spy0125 and Spy0130), joined covalently by a pilin polymerase (Spy0129). Previous studies using recombinant proteins showed that both minor subunits bind to human pharyngeal (Detroit) cells (A. G. Manetti et al., Mol. Microbiol. 64:968-983, 2007), suggesting both may act as pilus-presented adhesins. While confirming these binding properties, studies described here indicate that Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role as a wall linker. Pili were localized predominantly to cell wall fractions of the wild-type S. pyogenes parent strain and a spy0125 deletion mutant. In contrast, they were found almost exclusively in culture supernatants in both spy0130 and srtA deletion mutants, indicating that the housekeeping sortase (SrtA) attaches pili to the cell wall by using Spy0130 as a linker protein. Adhesion assays with antisera specific for individual subunits showed that only anti-rSpy0125 serum inhibited adhesion of wild-type S. pyogenes to human keratinocytes and tonsil epithelium to a significant extent. Spy0125 was localized to the tip of pili, based on a combination of mutant analysis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of purified pili. Assays comparing parent and mutant strains confirmed its role as the adhesin. Unexpectedly, apparent spontaneous cleavage of a labile, proline-rich (8 of 14 residues) sequence separating the N-terminal ∼1/3 and C-terminal ∼2/3 of Spy0125 leads to loss of the N-terminal region, but analysis of internal spy0125 deletion mutants confirmed that this has no significant effect on adhesion.The group A Streptococcus (S. pyogenes) is an exclusively human pathogen that commonly colonizes either the pharynx or skin, where local spread can give rise to various inflammatory conditions such as pharyngitis, tonsillitis, sinusitis, or erysipelas. Although often mild and self-limiting, GAS infections are occasionally very severe and sometimes lead to life-threatening diseases, such as necrotizing fasciitis or streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. A wide variety of cell surface components and extracellular products have been shown or suggested to play important roles in S. pyogenes virulence, including cell surface pili (1, 6, 32). Pili expressed by the serotype M1 S. pyogenes strain SF370 mediate specific adhesion to intact human tonsil epithelia and to primary human keratinocytes, as well as cultured keratinocyte-derived HaCaT cells, but not to Hep-2 or A549 cells (1). They also contribute to adhesion to a human pharyngeal cell line (Detroit cells) and to biofilm formation (29).Over the past 5 years, pili have been discovered on an increasing number of important Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including Bacillus cereus (4), Bacillus anthracis (4, 5), Corynebacterium diphtheriae (13, 14, 19, 26, 27, 44, 46, 47), Streptococcus agalactiae (7, 23, 38), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (2, 3, 24, 25, 34), as well as S. pyogenes (1, 29, 32). All these species produce pili that are composed of a single major subunit plus either one or two minor subunits. During assembly, the individual subunits are covalently linked to each other via intermolecular isopeptide bonds, catalyzed by specialized membrane-associated transpeptidases that may be described as pilin polymerases (4, 7, 25, 41, 44, 46). These are related to the classical housekeeping sortase (usually, but not always, designated SrtA) that is responsible for anchoring many proteins to Gram-positive bacterial cell walls (30, 31, 33). The C-terminal ends of sortase target proteins include a cell wall sorting (CWS) motif consisting, in most cases, of Leu-Pro-X-Thr-Gly (LPXTG, where X can be any amino acid) (11, 40). Sortases cleave this substrate between the Thr and Gly residues and produce an intermolecular isopeptide bond linking the Thr to a free amino group provided by a specific target. In attaching proteins to the cell wall, the target amino group is provided by the lipid II peptidoglycan precursor (30, 36, 40). In joining pilus subunits, the target is the ɛ-amino group in the side chain of a specific Lys residue in the second subunit (14, 18, 19). Current models of pilus biogenesis envisage repeated transpeptidation reactions adding additional subunits to the base of the growing pilus, until the terminal subunit is eventually linked covalently via an intermolecular isopeptide bond to the cell wall (28, 41, 45).The major subunit (sometimes called the backbone or shaft subunit) extends along the length of the pilus and appears to play a structural role, while minor subunits have been detected either at the tip, the base, and/or at occasional intervals along the shaft, depending on the species (4, 23, 24, 32, 47). In S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae one of the minor subunits acts as an adhesin, while the second appears to act as a linker between the base of the assembled pilus and the cell wall (7, 15, 22, 34, 35). It was originally suggested that both minor subunits of C. diphtheriae pili could act as adhesins (27). However, recent data showed one of these has a wall linker role (26, 44) and may therefore not function as an adhesin.S. pyogenes strain SF370 pili are composed of a major (backbone) subunit, termed Spy0128, plus two minor subunits, called Spy0125 and Spy0130 (1, 32). All three are required for efficient adhesion to target cells (1). Studies employing purified recombinant proteins have shown that both of the minor subunits, but not the major subunit, bind to Detroit cells (29), suggesting both might act as pilus-presented adhesins. Here we report studies employing a combination of recombinant proteins, specific antisera, and allelic replacement mutants which show that only Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role in linking pili to the cell wall.