Microhomology-dependent end joining and repair of transposon-induced DNA hairpins by host factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The maize, cut-and-paste transposon Ac/Ds is mobile in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and DNA sequences of repair products provide strong genetic evidence that hairpin intermediates form in host DNA during this transposition, similar to those formed for V(D)J coding joints in vertebrates. Both DNA strands must be broken for Ac/Ds to excise, suggesting that double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways should be involved in repair of excision sites. In the absence of homologous template, as expected, Ac excisions are repaired by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) that can involve microhomologies close to the broken ends. However, unlike repair of endonuclease-induced DSBs, repair of Ac excisions in the presence of homologous template occurs by gene conversion only about half the time, the remainder being NHEJ events. Analysis of transposition in mutant yeast suggests roles for the Mre11/Rad50 complex, SAE2, NEJ1, and the Ku complex in repair of excision sites. Separation-of-function alleles of MRE11 suggest that its endonuclease function is more important in this repair than either its exonuclease or Rad50-binding properties. In addition, the interstrand cross-link repair gene PSO2 plays a role in end joining hairpin ends that is not seen in repair of linearized plasmids and may be involved in positioning transposase cleavage at the transposon ends.     

The fission yeast MRN complex tethers dysfunctional telomeres for NHEJ repair

Telomeres protect the natural ends of chromosomes from being repaired as deleterious DNA breaks. In fission yeast, absence of Taz1 (homologue of human TRF1 and TRF2) renders telomeres vulnerable to DNA repair. During the G1 phase, when non‐homologous end joining (NHEJ) is upregulated, taz1Δ cells undergo telomere fusions with consequent loss of viability. Here, we show that disruption of the fission yeast MRN (Rad23^MRE11‐Rad50‐Nbs1) complex prevents NHEJ at telomeres and, as a result, rescues taz1Δ lethality in G1. Neither Tel1^ATM activation nor 5′‐end resection was required for telomere fusion. Nuclease activity of Rad32^MRE11 was also dispensable for NHEJ. Mutants unable to coordinate metal ions required for nuclease activity were proficient in NHEJ repair. In contrast, Rad32^MRE11 mutations that affect binding and/or positioning of DNA ends leaving the nuclease function largely unaffected also impaired NHEJ at telomeres and restored the viability of taz1Δ in G1. Consistently, MRN structural integrity but not nuclease function is also required for NHEJ of independent DNA ends in a novel split‐molecule plasmid assay. Thus, MRN acts to tether unlinked DNA ends, allowing for efficient NHEJ.     

DNA End Resection:Facts and Mechanisms

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which arise following exposure to a number of endogenous and exogenous agents, can be repaired by either the homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathways in eukaryotic cells. A vital step in HR repair is DNA end resection, which generates a long 30 single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tail that can invade the homologous DNA strand. The generation of 30 ssDNA is not only essential for HR repair, but also promotes activation of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR). Multiple fac-tors, including the MRN/X complex, C-terminal-binding protein interacting protein (CtIP)/Sae2, exonuclease 1 (EXO1), Bloom syndrome protein (BLM)/Sgs1, DNA2 nuclease/helicase, and several chromatin remodelers, cooperate to complete the process of end resection. Here we review the basic machinery involved in DNA end resection in eukaryotic cells.     

End Resection at Double-Strand Breaks: Mechanism and Regulation

RecA/Rad51 catalyzed pairing of homologous DNA strands, initiated by polymerization of the recombinase on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), is a universal feature of homologous recombination (HR). Generation of ssDNA from a double-strand break (DSB) requires nucleolytic degradation of the 5′-terminated strands to generate 3′-ssDNA tails, a process referred to as 5′–3′ end resection. The RecBCD helicase–nuclease complex is the main end-processing machine in Gram-negative bacteria. Mre11-Rad50 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2/Nbs1 can play a direct role in end resection in archaea and eukaryota, respectively, by removing end-blocking lesions and act indirectly by recruiting the helicases and nucleases responsible for extensive resection. In eukaryotic cells, the initiation of end resection has emerged as a critical regulatory step to differentiate between homology-dependent and end-joining repair of DSBs.DSBs can arise accidentally during normal cell metabolism or after exposure of cells to DNA-damaging agents, and also serve as intermediates in a number of programmed recombination events in eukaryotic cells (Mehta and Haber 2014). The repair of DSBs is critical for maintenance of genome integrity, and misrepair, or failure to repair, is associated with chromosome rearrangements, chromosome loss, or even cell death. Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms for the recognition and repair of DSBs. The two predominant repair mechanisms are HR and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). HR relies on the presence of an intact homologous duplex to template repair of the broken strands, whereas NHEJ repairs DSBs by direct ligation of the DNA ends. For DSBs to be repaired by HR, the ends must first be degraded to generate long 3′-ssDNA tails, a process referred to as 5′–3′ end resection. The 3′-ssDNA tails are then bound by a member of the RecA/Rad51 family of proteins to initiate homologous pairing and serve as primers for DNA synthesis following strand invasion. Strand invasion intermediates are further processed by helicases and/or nucleases (Bizard and Hickson 2014; Wyatt and West 2014), and ultimately by gap-filling DNA synthesis and ligation, to generate mature recombinant products. The DNA end-resection step of HR is conserved in all domains of life, but the mechanisms used for generating ssDNA are distinct. Here, we review the basic machinery for DNA end resection in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryota and the regulation of end resection in eukaryotic cells.     

DNA homologous recombination repair in mammalian cells

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most serious DNA damage. Due to a great variety of factors causing DSBs, the efficacy of their repair is crucial for the cell's functioning and prevents DNA fragmentation, chromosomal translocation and deletion. In mammalian cells DSBs can be repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HRR) and single strand annealing (SSA). HRR can be divided into the first and second phase. The first phase is initiated by sensor proteins belonging to the MRN complex, that activate the ATM protein which target HRR proteins to obtain the second response phase--repair. HRR is precise because it utilizes a non-damaged homologous DNA fragment as a template. The key players of HRR in mammalian cells are MRN, RPA, Rad51 and its paralogs, Rad52 and Rad54.     

Healing the wounds inflicted by sleeping beauty transposition by double-strand break repair in mammalian somatic cells

The Sleeping Beauty (SB) element is a useful tool to probe transposon-host interactions in vertebrates. We investigated requirements of DNA repair factors for SB transposition in mammalian cells. Factors of nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), including Ku, DNA-PKcs, and Xrcc4 as well as Xrcc3/Rad51C, a complex that functions during homologous recombination, are required for efficient transposition. NHEJ plays a dominant role in repair of transposon excision sites in somatic cells. Artemis is dispensable for transposition, consistent with the lack of a hairpin structure at excision sites. Ku physically interacts with the SB transposase. DNA-PKcs is a limiting factor for transposition and, in addition to repair, has a function in transposition that is independent from its kinase activity. ATM is involved in excision site repair and affects transposition rates. The overlapping but distinct roles of repair factors in transposition and in V(D)J recombination might influence the outcomes of these mechanistically similar processes.     

Inhibition of DNA double-strand break repair by the Ku heterodimer in mrx mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeast rad50 and mre11 nuclease mutants are hypersensitive to physical and chemical agents that induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). This sensitivity was suppressed by elevating intracellular levels of TLC1, the RNA subunit of telomerase. Suppression required proteins linked to homologous recombination, including Rad51, Rad52, Rad59 and Exo1, but not genes of the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathway. Deletion mutagenesis experiments demonstrated that the 5'-end of TLC1 RNA was essential and a segment containing a binding site for the Yku70/Yku80 complex was sufficient for suppression. A mutant TLC1 RNA unable to associate with Yku80 protein did not increase resistance. These and other genetic studies indicated that association of the Ku heterodimer with broken DNA ends inhibits recombination in mrx mutants, but not in repair-proficient cells or in other DNA repair single mutants. In support of this model, DNA damage resistance of mrx cells was enhanced when YKU70 was co-inactivated. Defective recombinational repair of DSBs in mrx cells thus arises from at least two separate processes: loss of Mrx nuclease-associated DNA end-processing and inhibition of the Exo1-mediated secondary recombination pathway by Ku.     

Promotion of Dnl4-catalyzed DNA end-joining by the Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 and Hdf1/Hdf2 complexes.

S. cerevisiae RAD50, MRE11, and XRS2 genes are required for telomere maintenance, cell cycle checkpoint signaling, meiotic recombination, and the efficient repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB)s by homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). Here, we demonstrate that the complex formed by Rad50, Mre11, and Xrs2 proteins promotes intermolecular DNA joining by DNA ligase IV (Dnl4) and its associated protein Lif1. Our results show that the Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 complex juxtaposes linear DNA molecules via their ends to form oligomers and interacts directly with Dnl4/Lif1. We also demonstrate that Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2-mediated intermolecular DNA joining is further stimulated by Hdf1/Hdf2, the yeast homolog of the mammalian Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer. These studies reveal specific functional interplay among the Hdf1/Hdf2, Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2, and Dnl4/Lif1 complexes in NHEJ.     

Non-homologous DNA end joining

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a serious threat for the cell and when not repaired or misrepaired can result in mutations or chromosome rearrangements and eventually in cell death. Therefore, cells have evolved a number of pathways to deal with DSB including homologous recombination (HR), single-strand annealing (SSA) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In mammals DSBs are primarily repaired by NHEJ and HR, while HR repair dominates in yeast, but this depends also on the phase of the cell cycle. NHEJ functions in all kinds of cells, from bacteria to man, and depends on the structure of DSB termini. In this process two DNA ends are joined directly, usually with no sequence homology, although in the case of same polarity of the single stranded overhangs in DSBs, regions of microhomology are utilized. The usage of microhomology is common in DNA end-joining of physiological DSBs, such as at the coding ends in V(D)J (variable(diversity) joining) recombination. The main components of the NHEJ system in eukaryotes are the catalytic subunit of DNA protein kinase (DNA-PK(cs)), which is recruited by DNA Ku protein, a heterodimer of Ku70 and Ku80, as well as XRCC4 protein and DNA ligase IV. A complex of Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2, a family of Sir proteins and probably other yet unidentified proteins can be also involved in this process. NHEJ and HR may play overlapping roles in the repair of DSBs produced in the S phase of the cell cycle or at replication forks. Aside from DNA repair, NHEJ may play a role in many different processes, including the maintenance of telomeres and integration of HIV-1 genome into a host genome, as well as the insertion of pseudogenes and repetitive sequences into the genome of mammalian cells. Inhibition of NHEJ can be exploited in cancer therapy in radio-sensitizing cancer cells. Identification of all key players and fundamental mechanisms underlying NHEJ still requires further research.     

Making the best of the loose ends: Mre11/Rad50 complexes and Sae2 promote DNA double-strand break resection

Double-strand breaks in chromosomal DNA are repaired efficiently in eukaryotic cells through pathways that involve direct religation of broken ends, or through pathways that utilize an unbroken, homologous DNA molecule as a template for replication. Pathways of repair that require homology initiate with the resection of the 5' strand at the break site, to uncover the 3' single-stranded DNA that becomes a critical intermediate in single-strand annealing and in homologous strand exchange. Resection of the 5' strand is regulated to occur most efficiently in S and G(2) phases of the cell cycle when sister chromatids are present as recombination templates. The mechanisms governing resection in eukaryotes have been elusive for many years, but recent work has identified the major players in short-range processing of DNA ends as well as the extensive resection of breaks that has been observed in vivo. This review focuses on the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2(Nbs1) complex and the Sae2(CtIP) protein and their roles in initiating both short-range and long-range resection, the effects of topoisomerase-DNA conjugates on resection in vivo, and the relationship between these factors and NHEJ proteins in regulating 5' strand resection in eukaryotic cells.     

Differential suppression of DNA repair deficiencies of Yeast rad50, mre11 and xrs2 mutants by EXO1 and TLC1 (the RNA component of telomerase).

Rad50, Mre11, and Xrs2 form a nuclease complex that functions in both nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and recombinational repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). A search for highly expressed cDNAs that suppress the DNA repair deficiency of rad50 mutants yielded multiple isolates of two genes: EXO1 and TLC1. Overexpression of EXO1 or TLC1 increased the resistance of rad50, mre11, and xrs2 mutants to ionizing radiation and MMS, but did not increase resistance in strains defective in recombination (rad51, rad52, rad54, rad59) or NHEJ only (yku70, sir4). Increased Exo1 or TLC1 RNA did not alter checkpoint responses or restore NHEJ proficiency, but DNA repair defects of yku70 and rad27 (fen) mutants were differentially suppressed by the two genes. Overexpression of Exo1, but not mutant proteins containing substitutions in the conserved nuclease domain, increased recombination and suppressed HO and EcoRI endonuclease-induced killing of rad50 strains. exo1 rad50 mutants lacking both nuclease activities exhibited a high proportion of enlarged, G2-arrested cells and displayed a synergistic decrease in DSB-induced plasmid:chromosome recombination. These results support a model in which the nuclease activity of the Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 complex is required for recombinational repair, but not NHEJ. We suggest that the 5'-3' exo activity of Exo1 is able to substitute for Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 in rescission of specific classes of DSB end structures. Gene-specific suppression by TLC1, which encodes the RNA subunit of the yeast telomerase complex, demonstrates that components of telomerase can also impact on DSB repair pathways.     

Quantitative Live Cell Imaging Reveals a Gradual Shift between DNA Repair Mechanisms and a Maximal Use of HR in Mid S Phase

DNA double-strand breaks are repaired by two main?pathways: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The choice between these pathways depends on cell-cycle phase; however the continuous effect of cell cycle on the balance between them is still unclear. We used live cell imaging and fluorescent reporters for 53BP1, Rad52, and cell cycle to quantify the relative contribution of NHEJ and HR at different points of the cell cycle in single cells. We found that NHEJ is the dominant repair pathway in G1 and G2 even when both repair pathways are functional. The shift from NHEJ to HR is gradual, with the highest proportion of breaks repaired by HR in mid S, where the amount of DNA replication is highest. Higher proportions of HR also strongly correlate with slower rates of repair. Our study shows that the choice of repair mechanism is continuously adjusted throughout the cell cycle and suggests that the extent of active replication, rather than the presence of a sister chromatid influences the balance between the two repair pathways in human cells.     

The Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex and non-homologous end-joining of incompatible ends in S. cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 (MRX) complex plays important roles in both homologous and non-homologous pathways of DNA repair. In this study, we investigated the role of the MRX complex and its enzymatic functions in non-homologous repair of DNA ends containing incompatible end structures. Using a plasmid transformation assay, we found that mre11 and rad50 null strains are extremely deficient in joining of incompatible DNA ends. Expression of the nuclease-deficient Mre11 mutant H125N fully complemented the mre11 strain for joining of mismatched ends in the absence of homology, while a mutant of Rad50 deficient in ATP-dependent activities exhibited levels of end-joining similar to a rad50 deletion strain. Although the majority of non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) products isolated did not contain microhomologies, introduction of an 8bp microhomology at mismatched ends resulted in microhomology-mediated joining in all of the products recovered, demonstrating that a microhomology exerts a dominant effect on processing events that occur during NHEJ. Nuclease-deficient Mre11p was less efficient in promoting microhomology-mediated end-joining in comparison to its ability to stimulate non-microhomology-mediated events, suggesting that Mre11p influences, but is not essential for, microhomology-mediated repair. When the linearized DNA was transformed in the presence of an intact homologous plasmid to facilitate gap repair, there was no decrease in NHEJ products obtained, suggesting that NHEJ and homologous repair do not compete for DNA ends in vivo. These results suggest that the MRX complex is essential for joining of incompatible ends by NHEJ, and the ATP-dependent activities of Rad50 are critical for this process.     

Molecular architecture of the HerA–NurA DNA double-strand break resection complex

DNA double-strand breaks can be repaired by homologous recombination, during which the DNA ends are long-range resected by helicase–nuclease systems to generate 3′ single strand tails. In archaea, this requires the Mre11–Rad50 complex and the ATP-dependent helicase–nuclease complex HerA–NurA. We report the cryo-EM structure of Sulfolobus solfataricus HerA–NurA at 7.4 Å resolution and present the pseudo-atomic model of the complex. HerA forms an ASCE hexamer that tightly interacts with a NurA dimer, with each NurA protomer binding three adjacent HerA HAS domains. Entry to NurA’s nuclease active sites requires dsDNA to pass through a 23 Å wide channel in the HerA hexamer. The structure suggests that HerA is a dsDNA translocase that feeds DNA into the NurA nuclease sites.     

An xrcc4 defect or Wortmannin stimulates homologous recombination specifically induced by double-strand breaks in mammalian cells

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) are two alternative/competitor pathways for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To gain further insights into the regulation of DSB repair, we detail here the different HR pathways affected by (i) the inactivation of DNA-PK activity, by treatment with Wortmannin, and (ii) a mutation in the xrcc4 gene, involved in a late NHEJ step, using the XR-1 cell line. Here we have analyzed not only the impact of NHEJ inactivation on recombination induced by a single DSB targeted to the recombination substrate (using I-SceI endonuclease) but also on γ-ray- and UV-C-induced and spontaneous recombination and finally on Rad51 foci formation, i.e. on the assembly of the homologous recombination complex, at the molecular level. The results presented here show that in contrast to embryonic stem cells, the xrcc4 mutation strongly stimulates I-SceI-induced HR in adult hamster cells. More precisely, we show here that both single strand annealing and gene conversion are stimulated. In contrast, Wortmannin does not affect I-SceI-induced HR. In addition, γ-ray-induced recombination is stimulated by both xrcc4 mutation and Wortmannin treatment in an epistatic-like manner. In contrast, neither spontaneous nor UV-C-induced recombination was affected by xrcc4 mutation, showing that the channeling from NHEJ to HR is specific to DSBs. Finally, we show here that xrcc4 mutation or Wortmannin treatment results in a stimulation of Rad51 foci assembly, thus that a late NHEJ step is able to affect Rad51 recombination complex assembly. The present data suggest a model according to which NHEJ and HR do not simply compete for DSB repair but can act sequentially: a defect in a late NHEJ step is not a dead end and can make DSB available for subsequent Rad51 recombination complex assembly.     

The Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex functions in resection-based DNA end joining in Xenopus laevis

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is essential to maintain genomic integrity. In higher eukaryotes, DNA DSBs are predominantly repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), but DNA ends can also be joined by an alternative error-prone mechanism termed microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). In MMEJ, the repair of DNA breaks is mediated by annealing at regions of microhomology and is always associated with deletions at the break site. In budding yeast, the Mre11/Rad5/Xrs2 complex has been demonstrated to play a role in both classical NHEJ and MMEJ, but the involvement of the analogous MRE11/RAD50/NBS1 (MRN) complex in end joining in higher eukaryotes is less certain. Here we demonstrate that in Xenopus laevis egg extracts, the MRN complex is not required for classical DNA-PK-dependent NHEJ. However, the XMRN complex is necessary for resection-based end joining of mismatched DNA ends. This XMRN-dependent end joining process is independent of the core NHEJ components Ku70 and DNA-PK, occurs with delayed kinetics relative to classical NHEJ and brings about repair at sites of microhomology. These data indicate a role for the X. laevis MRN complex in MMEJ.     

Structural mechanism of ATP‐dependent DNA binding and DNA end bridging by eukaryotic Rad50

The Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 (MRN) complex is a central factor in the repair of DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs). The ATP‐dependent mechanisms of how MRN detects and endonucleolytically processes DNA ends for the repair by microhomology‐mediated end‐joining or further resection in homologous recombination are still unclear. Here, we report the crystal structures of the ATPγS‐bound dimer of the Rad50^NBD (nucleotide‐binding domain) from the thermophilic eukaryote Chaetomium thermophilum (Ct) in complex with either DNA or CtMre11^RBD (Rad50‐binding domain) along with small‐angle X‐ray scattering and cross‐linking studies. The structure and DNA binding motifs were validated by DNA binding experiments in vitro and mutational analyses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in vivo. Our analyses provide a structural framework for the architecture of the eukaryotic Mre11–Rad50 complex. They show that a Rad50 dimer binds approximately 18 base pairs of DNA along the dimer interface in an ATP‐dependent fashion or bridges two DNA ends with a preference for 3′ overhangs. Finally, our results may provide a general framework for the interaction of ABC ATPase domains of the Rad50/SMC/RecN protein family with DNA.     

Ku heterodimer-independent end joining in Trypanosoma brucei cell extracts relies upon sequence microhomology

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired primarily by two distinct pathways: homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). NHEJ has been found in all eukaryotes examined to date and has been described recently for some bacterial species, illustrating its ancestry. Trypanosoma brucei is a divergent eukaryotic protist that evades host immunity by antigenic variation, a process in which homologous recombination plays a crucial function. While homologous recombination has been examined in some detail in T. brucei, little work has been done to examine what other DSB repair pathways the parasite utilizes. Here we show that T. brucei cell extracts support the end joining of linear DNA molecules. These reactions are independent of the Ku heterodimer, indicating that they are distinct from NHEJ, and are guided by sequence microhomology. We also demonstrate bioinformatically that T. brucei, in common with other kinetoplastids, does not encode recognizable homologues of DNA ligase IV or XRCC4, suggesting that NHEJ is either absent or mechanistically diverged in these pathogens.     

The role of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad32, the Mre11 homologue, and other DNA damage response proteins in non-homologous end joining and telomere length maintenance.

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue of Mre11, Rad32, is required for repair of UV- and ionising radiation-induced DNA damage and meiotic recombination. In this study we have investigated the role of Rad32 and other DNA damage response proteins in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and telomere length maintenance in S.pombe. We show that NHEJ in S.pombe occurs by an error-prone mechanism, in contrast to the accurate repair observed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Deletion of the rad32 gene results in a modest reduction in NHEJ activity and the remaining repair events that occur are accurate. Mutations in two of the phosphoesterase motifs in Rad32 have no effect on the efficiency or accuracy of end joining, suggesting that the role of Rad32 protein may be to recruit another nuclease(s) for processing during the end joining reaction. We also analysed NHEJ in other DNA damage response mutants and showed that the checkpoint mutant rad3-d and two recombination mutants defective in rhp51 and rhp54 (homologues of S.cerevisiae RAD51 and RAD54, respectively) are not affected. However disruption of rad22, rqh1 and rhp9 / crb2 (homologues of the S.cerevisiae RAD52, SGS1 and RAD9 genes) resulted in increased NHEJ activity. Telomere lengths in the rad32, rhp9 and rqh1 null alleles were reduced to varying extents intermediate between the lengths observed in wild-type and rad3 null cells.     

Rad52 and Ku bind to different DNA structures produced early in double-strand break repair

DNA double-strand breaks are repaired by one of two main pathways, non-homologous end joining or homologous recombination. A competition for binding to DNA ends by Ku and Rad52, proteins required for non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination, respectively, has been proposed to determine the choice of repair pathway. In order to test this idea directly, we compared Ku and human Rad52 binding to different DNA substrates. How ever, we found no evidence that these proteins would compete for binding to the same broken DNA ends. Ku bound preferentially to DNA with free ends. Under the same conditions, Rad52 did not bind preferentially to DNA ends. Using a series of defined substrates we showed that it is single-stranded DNA and not DNA ends that were preferentially bound by Rad52. In addition, Rad52 aggregated DNA, bringing different single-stranded DNAs in close proximity. This activity was independent of the presence of DNA ends and of the ability of the single-stranded sequences to form extensive base pairs. Based on these DNA binding characteristics it is unlikely that Rad52 and Ku compete as ‘gatekeepers’ of different DNA double-strand break repair pathways. Rather, they interact with different DNA substrates produced early in DNA double-strand break repair.