Development of inhibitors of heterotrimeric Gαi subunits

Heterotrimeric G-proteins are the immediate downstream effectors of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Endogenous protein guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) like AGS3/4 and RGS12/14 function through GPR/Goloco GDI domains. Extensive characterization of GPR domain peptides indicate they function as selective GDIs for Gα_i by competing for the GPCR and Gβγ and preventing GDP release. We modified a GPR consensus peptide by testing FGF and TAT leader sequences to make the peptide cell permeable. FGF modification inhibited GDI activity while TAT preserved GDI activity. TAT-GPR suppresses G-protein coupling to the receptor and completely blocked α₂-adrenoceptor (α₂AR) mediated decreases in cAMP in HEK293 cells at 100 nM. We then sought to discover selective small molecule inhibitors for Gα_i. Molecular docking was used to identify potential molecules that bind to and stabilize the Gα_i–GDP complex by directly interacting with both Gα_i and GDP. Gα_i–GTP and Gα_q–GDP were used as a computational counter screen and Gα_q–GDP was used as a biological counter screen. Thirty-seven molecules were tested using nucleotide exchange. STD NMR assays with compound 0990, a quinazoline derivative, showed direct interaction with Gα_i. Several compounds showed Gα_i specific inhibition and were able to block α₂AR mediated regulation of cAMP. In addition to being a pharmacologic tool, GDI inhibition of Gα subunits has the advantage of circumventing the upstream component of GPCR-related signaling in cases of overstimulation by agonists, mutations, polymorphisms, and expression-related defects often seen in disease.     

Pasteurella multocida toxin activates Gβγ dimers of heterotrimeric G proteins

The mitogenic Pasteurella multocida toxin (PMT) is a major virulence factor of P. multocida, which causes Pasteurellosis in man and animals. The toxin activates the small GTPase RhoA, the MAP kinase ERK and STAT proteins via the stimulation of members of two G protein families, G_q and G_12/13. PMT action also results in an increase in inositol phosphates, which is due to the stimulation of PLCβ via Gα_q. Recent studies indicate that PMT additionally activates Gα_i to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. Here we show that PMT acts not only via Gα but also through Gβγ signaling. Activation of Gβγ by PMT causes stimulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) γ and formation of phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP₃) as indicated by the recruitment of a PIP₃-binding pleckstrin homology (PH) domain-containing protein to the plasma membrane. Moreover, it is demonstrated that Gβγ is necessary for PMT-induced signaling via Gα. Mutants of Gα_q incapable of binding or releasing Gβγ are not activated by PMT. Similarly, sequestration of Gβγ inhibits PMT-induced Gα-signaling.     

Regulators of G Protein Signaling Attenuate the G Protein–mediated Inhibition of N-Type Ca Channels

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins bind to the α subunits of certain heterotrimeric G proteins and greatly enhance their rate of GTP hydrolysis, thereby determining the time course of interactions among Gα, Gβγ, and their effectors. Voltage-gated N-type Ca channels mediate neurosecretion, and these Ca channels are powerfully inhibited by G proteins. To determine whether RGS proteins could influence Ca channel function, we recorded the activity of N-type Ca channels coexpressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells with G protein–coupled muscarinic (m2) receptors and various RGS proteins. Coexpression of full-length RGS3T, RGS3, or RGS8 significantly attenuated the magnitude of receptor-mediated Ca channel inhibition. In control cells expressing α1B, α2, and β3 Ca channel subunits and m2 receptors, carbachol (1 μM) inhibited whole-cell currents by ∼80% compared with only ∼55% inhibition in cells also expressing exogenous RGS protein. A similar effect was produced by expression of the conserved core domain of RGS8. The attenuation of Ca current inhibition resulted primarily from a shift in the steady state dose–response relationship to higher agonist concentrations, with the EC₅₀ for carbachol inhibition being ∼18 nM in control cells vs. ∼150 nM in RGS-expressing cells. The kinetics of Ca channel inhibition were also modified by RGS. Thus, in cells expressing RGS3T, the decay of prepulse facilitation was slower, and recovery of Ca channels from inhibition after agonist removal was faster than in control cells. The effects of RGS proteins on Ca channel modulation can be explained by their ability to act as GTPase-accelerating proteins for some Gα subunits. These results suggest that RGS proteins may play important roles in shaping the magnitude and kinetics of physiological events, such as neurosecretion, that involve G protein–modulated Ca channels.     

Phototautomerism of the GC base pair of DNA

Electronic spectra and ground and excited state electronic structures of normal G and rare tautomeric G1z.sbnd;C1 base pairs as well as of the individual rare tautomeric bases (purines and pyrimidines) have been studied using the VE-PPP molecular orbital method. The nature and consequences of the lowest energy purine-localized and purine to pyrimidine charge transfer type π?π1 singlet excitations of the base pairs have been investigated. The results indicate that in these excited states, particularly in the charge transfer excited state, the probability for the GC base pair to change over to G1C1 would be larger than in the ground state. The likeliness of the relevance of results obtained experimentally by other workers from the study of a model system to the GC base pair is discussed.     

Genetic and Physical Interactions between Gα Subunits and Components of the Gβγ Dimer of Heterotrimeric G Proteins in Neurospora crassa

Heterotrimeric G proteins are critical regulators of growth and asexual and sexual development in the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Three Gα subunits (GNA-1, GNA-2, and GNA-3), one Gβ subunit (GNB-1), and one Gγ subunit (GNG-1) have been functionally characterized, but genetic epistasis relationships between Gβ and Gα subunit genes have not been determined. Physical association between GNB-1 and FLAG-tagged GNG-1 has been previously demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitation, but knowledge of the Gα binding partners for the Gβγ dimer is currently lacking. In this study, the three N. crassa Gα subunits are analyzed for genetic epistasis with gnb-1 and for physical interaction with the Gβγ dimer. We created double mutants lacking one Gα gene and gnb-1 and introduced constitutively active, GTPase-deficient alleles for each Gα gene into the Δgnb-1 background. Genetic analysis revealed that gna-3 is epistatic to gnb-1 with regard to negative control of submerged conidiation. gnb-1 is epistatic to gna-2 and gna-3 for aerial hyphal height, while gnb-1 appears to act upstream of gna-1 and gna-2 during aerial conidiation. None of the activated Gα alleles restored female fertility to Δgnb-1 mutants, and the gna-3^Q208L allele inhibited formation of female reproductive structures, consistent with a need for Gα proteins to cycle through the inactive GDP-bound form for these processes. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments using extracts from the gng-1-FLAG strain demonstrated that the three Gα proteins interact with the Gβγ dimer. The finding that the Gβγ dimer interacts with all three Gα proteins is supported by epistasis between gnb-1 and gna-1, gna-2, and gna-3 for at least one function.     

Integration of G Protein α (Gα) Signaling by the Regulator of G Protein Signaling 14 (RGS14)

RGS14 contains distinct binding sites for both active (GTP-bound) and inactive (GDP-bound) forms of Gα subunits. The N-terminal regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) domain binds active Gα_i/o-GTP, whereas the C-terminal G protein regulatory (GPR) motif binds inactive Gα_i1/3-GDP. The molecular basis for how RGS14 binds different activation states of Gα proteins to integrate G protein signaling is unknown. Here we explored the intramolecular communication between the GPR motif and the RGS domain upon G protein binding and examined whether RGS14 can functionally interact with two distinct forms of Gα subunits simultaneously. Using complementary cellular and biochemical approaches, we demonstrate that RGS14 forms a stable complex with inactive Gα_i1-GDP at the plasma membrane and that free cytosolic RGS14 is recruited to the plasma membrane by activated Gα_o-AlF₄⁻. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer studies showed that RGS14 adopts different conformations in live cells when bound to Gα in different activation states. Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry revealed that RGS14 is a very dynamic protein that undergoes allosteric conformational changes when inactive Gα_i1-GDP binds the GPR motif. Pure RGS14 forms a ternary complex with Gα_o-AlF₄⁻ and an AlF₄⁻-insensitive mutant (G42R) of Gα_i1-GDP, as observed by size exclusion chromatography and differential hydrogen/deuterium exchange. Finally, a preformed RGS14·Gα_i1-GDP complex exhibits full capacity to stimulate the GTPase activity of Gα_o-GTP, demonstrating that RGS14 can functionally engage two distinct forms of Gα subunits simultaneously. Based on these findings, we propose a working model for how RGS14 integrates multiple G protein signals in host CA2 hippocampal neurons to modulate synaptic plasticity.     

Identification of G Protein α Subunit-Palmitoylating Enzyme

The heterotrimeric G protein α subunit (Gα) is targeted to the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane through reversible lipid palmitoylation and relays signals from G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to its effectors. By screening 23 DHHC motif (Asp-His-His-Cys) palmitoyl acyl-transferases, we identified DHHC3 and DHHC7 as Gα palmitoylating enzymes. DHHC3 and DHHC7 robustly palmitoylated Gα_q, Gα_s, and Gα_i2 in HEK293T cells. Knockdown of DHHC3 and DHHC7 decreased Gα_q/11 palmitoylation and relocalized it from the plasma membrane into the cytoplasm. Photoconversion analysis revealed that Gα_q rapidly shuttles between the plasma membrane and the Golgi apparatus, where DHHC3 specifically localizes. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching studies showed that DHHC3 and DHHC7 are necessary for this continuous Gα_q shuttling. Furthermore, DHHC3 and DHHC7 knockdown blocked the α_1A-adrenergic receptor/Gα_q/11-mediated signaling pathway. Together, our findings revealed that DHHC3 and DHHC7 regulate GPCR-mediated signal transduction by controlling Gα localization to the plasma membrane.G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form the largest family of cell surface receptors, consisting of more than 700 members in humans. GPCRs respond to a variety of extracellular signals, including hormones and neurotransmitters, and are involved in various physiologic processes, such as smooth muscle contraction and synaptic transmission (20, 25). Heterotrimeric G proteins, composed of α, β, and γ subunits, transduce signals from GPCRs to their effectors and play a central role in the GPCR signaling pathway (13, 21, 24, 32). Although the Gα subunit seems to localize stably at the cytosolic face of the plasma membrane (PM), a recent report suggested that Gα_o, a Gα isoform, shuttles rapidly between the PM and intracellular membranes (2). The PM targeting of Gα requires both interaction with the Gβγ complex and subsequent lipid palmitoylation of Gα (22). Thus, palmitoylation of Gα is a critical determinant of membrane targeting of the heterotrimer Gαβγ.Protein palmitoylation is a common posttranslational modification with lipid palmitate and regulates protein trafficking and function (7, 18). Gα is a classic and representative palmitoyl substrate (19, 38), and recent studies revealed that protein palmitoylation modifies virtually almost all the components of G-protein signaling, including GPCRs, Gα subunits, several members of the RGS (regulators of G-protein signaling) family of GTPase-activating proteins, GPCR kinase GRK6, and some small GTPases (7, 33). This common lipid modification plays an important role in compartmentalizing G-protein signaling to the specific microdomain, such as membrane caveolae and lipid raft (26). The palmitoyl thioester bond is relatively labile, and palmitates on substrates turn over rapidly, allowing proteins to shuttle between the cytoplasm/intracellular organelles and the PM (2, 3, 27). For example, binding of isoproterenol to the β-adrenergic receptor markedly accelerates the depalmitoylation of the associated Gα_s, shifting Gα_s to the cytoplasm (37). This receptor activation-induced depalmitoylation was also observed in a major postsynaptic PSD-95 scaffold, which anchors the AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazole-4-propionic acid)-type glutamate receptor at the excitatory postsynapse through stargazin (6). On glutamate receptor activation, accelerated depalmitoylation of PSD-95 dissociates PSD-95 from postsynaptic sites and causes AMPA receptor endocytosis (6). Thus, palmitate turnover on Gα_s and PSD-95 is accelerated by receptor activation, contributing to downregulation of the signaling pathway. However, the enzymes that add palmitate to proteins (palmitoyl-acyl transferases [PATs]) and those that cleave the thioester bond (palmitoyl-protein thioesterases) were long elusive.Recent genetic studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified Erf2/Erf4 (1, 40) and Akr1 (29) as PATs for yeast Ras and yeast casein kinase 2, respectively. Erf2 and Akr1 have four- to six-pass transmembrane domains and share a common domain, referred to as a DHHC domain, a cysteine-rich domain with a conserved Asp-His-His-Cys signature motif. Because the DHHC domain is essential for the PAT activity, we isolated 23 mammalian DHHC domain-containing proteins (DHHC proteins) and developed a systematic screening method to identify the specific enzyme-substrate pairs (11, 12): DHHC2, -3, -7, and -15 for PSD-95 (11); DHHC21 for endothelial NO synthase (10); and DHHC3 and -7 for GABA_A receptor γ2 subunit (9). Several other groups also reported that DHHC9 with GCP16 mediates palmitoylation toward H- and N-Ras (36) and that DHHC17, also known as HIP14, palmitoylates several neuronal proteins: huntingtin (14), SNAP-25, and CSP (14, 23, 35). However, the existence of PATs for Gα has been controversial because spontaneous palmitoylation of Gα could occur in vitro (4).In this study, we screened the 23 DHHC clones to examine which DHHC proteins can palmitoylate Gα. We found that DHHC3 and -7 specifically and robustly palmitoylate Gα at the Golgi apparatus. Inhibition of DHHC3 and -7 reduces Gα_q/11 palmitoylation levels and delocalizes it from the PM to the cytoplasm in HeLa cells and primary hippocampal neurons. Also, DHHC3 and -7 are necessary for the continuous Gα_q shuttling between the Golgi apparatus and the PM. Finally, blocking DHHC3 and -7 inhibits the α_1A-adrenergic receptor [α_1A-AR]/Gα_q-mediated signaling pathway, indicating that DHHC3 and -7 play an essential role in GPCR signaling by regulating Gα localization.     

Role of Molecular Chaperones in G Protein ��5/Regulator of G Protein Signaling Dimer Assembly and G Protein �¦� Dimer Specificity

The G protein βγ subunit dimer (Gβγ) and the Gβ5/regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) dimer play fundamental roles in propagating and regulating G protein pathways, respectively. How these complexes form dimers when the individual subunits are unstable is a question that has remained unaddressed for many years. In the case of Gβγ, recent studies have shown that phosducin-like protein 1 (PhLP1) works as a co-chaperone with the cytosolic chaperonin complex (CCT) to fold Gβ and mediate its interaction with Gγ. However, it is not known what fraction of the many Gβγ combinations is assembled this way or whether chaperones influence the specificity of Gβγ dimer formation. Moreover, the mechanism of Gβ5-RGS assembly has yet to be assessed experimentally. The current study was undertaken to directly address these issues. The data show that PhLP1 plays a vital role in the assembly of Gγ2 with all four Gβ1–4 subunits and in the assembly of Gβ2 with all twelve Gγ subunits, without affecting the specificity of the Gβγ interactions. The results also show that Gβ5-RGS7 assembly is dependent on CCT and PhLP1, but the apparent mechanism is different from that of Gβγ. PhLP1 seems to stabilize the interaction of Gβ5 with CCT until Gβ5 is folded, after which it is released to allow Gβ5 to interact with RGS7. These findings point to a general role for PhLP1 in the assembly of all Gβγ combinations and suggest a CCT-dependent mechanism for Gβ5-RGS7 assembly that utilizes the co-chaperone activity of PhLP1 in a unique way.Eukaryotic cells utilize receptors coupled to heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins)³ to mediate a vast array of responses ranging from nutrient-induced migration of single-celled organisms to neurotransmitter-regulated neuronal activity in the human brain (1). Ligand binding to a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) initiates GTP exchange on the G protein heterotrimer (composed of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits), which in turn causes the release of Gα-GTP from the Gβγ dimer (2–4). Both Gα-GTP and Gβγ propagate and amplify the signal by interacting with effector enzymes and ion channels (1, 5). The duration and amplitude of the signal is dictated by receptor phosphorylation coupled with arrestin binding and internalization (6) and by regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, which serve as GTPase-activating proteins for the GTP-bound Gα subunit (7, 8). The G protein signaling cycle is reset as the inactive Gα-GDP reassembles with the Gβγ dimer and Gαβγ re-associates with the GPCR (5).To fulfill its essential role in signaling, the G protein heterotrimer must be assembled post-translationally from its nascent polypeptides. Significant progress has been made recently regarding the mechanism by which this process occurs. It has been clear for some time that the Gβγ dimer must assemble first, followed by subsequent association of Gα with Gβγ (9). What has not been clear was how Gβγ assembly would occur given the fact that neither Gβ nor Gγ is structurally stable without the other. An important breakthrough was the finding that phosducin-like protein 1 (PhLP1) functions as a co-chaperone with the chaperonin containing tailless complex polypeptide 1 (CCT) in the folding of nascent Gβ and its association with Gγ (10–15). CCT is an important chaperone that assists in the folding of actin and tubulin and many other cytosolic proteins, including many β propeller proteins like Gβ (16). PhLP1 has been known for some time to interact with Gβγ and was initially believed to inhibit Gβγ function (17). However, several recent studies have demonstrated that PhLP1 and CCT work together in a highly orchestrated manner to form the Gβγ dimer (10–15).Studies on the mechanism of PhLP1-mediated Gβγ assembly have focused on the most common dimer Gβ1γ2 (10, 13, 14), leaving open questions about the role of PhLP1 in the assembly of the other Gβγ combinations. These are important considerations given that humans possess 5 Gβ genes and 12 Gγ genes with some important splice variants (18, 19), resulting in more than 60 possible combinations of Gβγ dimers. Gβ1–4 share between 80 and 90% sequence identity and are broadly expressed (18, 19). Gβ5, the more atypical isoform, shares only ∼53% identity with Gβ1, carries a longer N-terminal domain, and is only expressed in the central nervous system and retina (20). The Gγ protein family is more heterogeneous than the Gβ family. The sequence identity of the 12 Gγ isoforms extends from 10 to 70% (21), and the Gγ family can be separated into 5 subfamilies (21–23). All Gγ proteins carry C-terminal isoprenyl modifications, which contribute to their association with the cell membrane, GPCRs, Gαs, and effectors (9). Subfamily I Gγ isoforms are post-translationally farnesylated, whereas all others are geranylgeranylated (22, 24).There is some inherent selectivity in the assembly of different Gβγ combinations, but in general Gβ1–4 can form dimers with most Gγ subunits (25). The physiological purpose of this large number of Gβγ combinations has intrigued researchers in the field for many years, and a large body of research indicates that GPCRs and effectors couple to a preferred subset of Gβγ combinations based somewhat on specific sequence complementarity, but even more so on cellular expression patterns, subcellular localization, and post-translational modifications (18).In contrast to Gβ1–4, Gβ5 does not interact with Gγ subunits in vivo, but it instead forms irreversible dimers with RGS proteins of the R7 family, which includes RGS proteins 6, 7, 9, and 11 (26). All R7 family proteins contain an N-terminal DEP (disheveled, Egl-10, pleckstrin) domain, a central Gγ-like (GGL) domain, and a C-terminal RGS domain (8, 26). The DEP domain interacts with the membrane anchoring/nuclear shuttling R7-binding protein, and the GGL domain binds to Gβ5 in a manner similar to other Gβγ associations (27, 28). Like Gβγs, Gβ5 and R7 RGS proteins form obligate dimers required for their mutual stability (26). Without their partner, Gβ5 and R7 RGS proteins are rapidly degraded in cells (26, 29). Gβ5-R7 RGS complexes act as important GTPase-accelerating proteins for G_i/oα and G_qα subunits in neuronal cells and some immune cells (26).It has been recently shown that all Gβ isoforms are able to interact with the CCT complex, but to varying degrees (15). Gβ4 and Gβ1 bind CCT better than Gβ2 and Gβ3, whereas Gβ5 binds CCT poorly (15). These results suggest that Gβ1 and Gβ4 might be more dependent on PhLP1 than the other Gβs, given the co-chaperone role of PhLP1 with CCT in Gβ1γ2 assembly. However, another report has indicated that Gγ2 assembly with Gβ1 and Gβ2 is more PhLP1-dependent than with Gβ3 and Gβ4 (30). Thus, it is not clear from current information whether PhLP1 and CCT participate in assembly of all Gβγ combinations or whether they contribute to the specificity of Gβγ dimer formation, nor is it clear whether they or other chaperones are involved in Gβ5-R7 RGS dimer formation. This report was designed to address these issues.     

Selection of optimal variants of Gō-like models of proteins through studies of stretching

The Gō-like models of proteins are constructed based on the knowledge of the native conformation. However, there are many possible choices of a Hamiltonian for which the ground state coincides with the native state. Here, we propose to use experimental data on protein stretching to determine what choices are most adequate physically. This criterion is motivated by the fact that stretching processes usually start with the native structure, in the vicinity of which the Gō-like models should work the best. Our selection procedure is applied to 62 different versions of the Gō model and is based on 28 proteins. We consider different potentials, contact maps, local stiffness energies, and energy scales—uniform and nonuniform. In the latter case, the strength of the nonuniformity was governed either by specificity or by properties related to positioning of the side groups. Among them is the simplest variant: uniform couplings with no i, i + 2 contacts. This choice also leads to good folding properties in most cases. We elucidate relationship between the local stiffness described by a potential which involves local chirality and the one which involves dihedral and bond angles. The latter stiffness improves folding but there is little difference between them when it comes to stretching.     

Function of α subunit of heterotrimeric G protein in brassinosteroid response of rice plants

The α subunit of heterotrimeric G-proteins (Gα) is involved in a broad range of aspects of the brassinosteroid (BR) response, such as the enhancement of lamina bending. However, it has been suggested from epistatic analysis of d1 and d61, which are mutants deficient for Gα and the BR receptor BRI1, that Gα and BRI1 may function via distinct pathways in many cases. In this study, we investigated further the genetic interaction between Gα and BRI1. We report the analysis of transformants of T65d1 and T65d1/d61-7 into which were introduced a constitutively active form of Gα, Q223L. The application of 24-epi-brassinolide (24-epiBL) to T65d1 expressing Q223L still resulted in elongation of the coleoptile and, in fact, it was enhanced over the wild-type plant (WT) level in a concentration dependent manner. In T65d1/d61-7 expressing Q223L, the seed size was enlarged over that of d61-7 due to activation of Gα. These results suggest that Q223L is able to augment the BR response in response to 24-epiBL and also that Q223L functions independently of BRI1 in the process of determining seed morphology, given that Q223L was functional in the BRI1-deficient mutant, d61-7.Key words: brassinosteroid, BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 (BRI1), genetic interaction, G-protein α subunit, rice plants, seed morphology, transgenic plants     

Comparison of antagonistic ability against enteropathogens by G+ and G− anaerobic dominant components of human fecal microbiota

To confirm if anaerobic G+-components are those responsible for the function of colonization resistance, obligate anaerobic G+- and G- -bacteria from normal dominant microbiota of human feces were isolated from three successive collections and then used in in vitro assays for antagonism against two enteropathogenic bacteria. The production of inhibitory diffusible compounds was determined on supplemented BHI agar and MRS agar media for G- - and G+-bacteria, respectively. Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium and Shigella sonnei were used as indicators. G+-bacteria presented a higher overall antagonistic frequency against both pathogenic bacteria (57 and 64 % for S. enterica serovar Typhimurium and S. sonnei, respectively) when compared to G+-microorganisms but with a quite elevated variation between volunteers (0-100 %) and collection samples (40-72 and 40-80 % for S. enterica sv. Typhimurium and S. sonnei, respectively). On the other hand, only three among 143 G- -isolates tested showed antagonistic activity. The results showed that, at least in vitro, obligate anaerobic G+-components of the dominant human fecal microbiota present a higher potential for antagonism against the enteropathogenic models tested than do G- -bacteria.     

The role of Gαq/Gα11 signaling in intestinal epithelial cells

Intestinal homeostasis and the coordinated actions of digestion, absorption and excretion are tightly regulated by a number of gastrointestinal hormones. Most of them exert their actions through G-protein-coupled receptors. Recently, we showed that the absence of Gα_q/Gα₁₁ signaling impaired the maturation of Paneth cells, induced their differentiation toward goblet cells, and affected the regeneration of the colonic mucosa in an experimental model of colitis. Although an immunohistochemical study showed that Gα_q/Gα₁₁ were highly expressed in enterocytes, it seemed that enterocytes were not affected in Int-G_q/G₁₁ double knock-out intestine. Thus, we used an intestinal epithelial cell line to examine the role of signaling through Gα_q/Gα₁₁ in enterocytes and manipulated the expression level of Gα_q and/or Gα₁₁. The proliferation was inhibited in IEC-6 cells that overexpressed Gα_q/Gα₁₁ and enhanced in IEC-6 cells in which Gα_q/Gα₁₁ was downregulated. The expression of T-cell factor 1 was increased according to the overexpression of Gα_q/Gα₁₁. The expression of Notch1 intracellular cytoplasmic domain was decreased by the overexpression of Gα_q/Gα₁₁ and increased by the downregulation of Gα_q/Gα₁₁. The relative mRNA expression of Muc2, a goblet cell marker, was elevated in a Gα_q/Gα₁₁ knock-down experiment. Our findings suggest that Gα_q/Gα₁₁-mediated signaling inhibits proliferation and may support a physiological function, such as absorption or secretion, in terminally differentiated enterocytes.     

Inhibition of Heterotrimeric G Protein Signaling by a Small Molecule Acting on G�� Subunit

The simultaneous activation of many distinct G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and heterotrimeric G proteins play a major role in various pathological conditions. Pan-inhibition of GPCR signaling by small molecules thus represents a novel strategy to treat various diseases. To better understand such therapeutic approach, we have characterized the biomolecular target of BIM-46187, a small molecule pan-inhibitor of GPCR signaling. Combining bioluminescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer techniques in living cells as well as in reconstituted receptor-G protein complexes, we observed that, by direct binding to the Gα subunit, BIM-46187 prevents the conformational changes of the receptor-G protein complex associated with GPCR activation. Such a binding prevents the proper interaction of receptors with the G protein heterotrimer and inhibits the agonist-promoted GDP/GTP exchange. These observations bring further evidence that inhibiting G protein activation through direct binding to the Gα subunit is feasible and should constitute a new strategy for therapeutic intervention.G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)³ represent the largest superfamily of signaling proteins with a very high impact on drug discovery (1). Approximately 30% of the current drug targets are indeed GPCRs and these latter are involved in all major disease areas (2). The classical drug discovery process selects and optimizes compounds that interact selectively with a specific receptor (1), but recent reports show that certain critical conditions such as cancer (3) or pain (4) are driven by the concomitant activation of many different GPCRs (5). Novel therapeutic strategies could therefore emerge from the simultaneous blockade of the various GPCRs involved in such pathologies. The GPCR signaling downstream cascade triggers several protein/protein interactions that may be blocked or modulated by small molecules (6). Such protein/protein interactions involve the GPCR transmembrane domain and the heterotrimeric G protein complex, composed of an α subunit (Gα) and a βγ dimer (Gβγ), which interact sequentially with several partners (e.g. guanine nucleotides, effectors, and regulatory proteins) (7). This offers multiple possibilities to develop small molecules controlling heterotrimeric G protein signaling (6, 8, 9). For example, Higashijima et al. (10, 11) showed that Mastoparan, a peptide toxin from wasp venom, directly acts on G proteins to mimic the role played by the activated receptors. The anti-helminthic drug Suramin and some analogs represent a second class of compounds that directly interact with G proteins and interfere with nucleotide exchange (12–14). Small molecules modulating regulator of G protein signaling proteins have also been proposed for drug development (15). More recently, Bonacci et al. (16) have described fluorescein analogs that display central pain relief activity via binding to the Gβγ subunits. From our own group, we have reported in vivo inhibition of the GPCR signaling pathway by two closely related imidazopirazine containing small molecules, displaying potent antiproliferative activity (BIM-46174) (17) and potent pain relief activity (BIM-46187) (18).Here, we examined the molecular mechanisms underlying the biological activity of BIM-46187 with the various constituents of the GPCR signaling pathways. We report that this small molecule prevents GPCR-G protein signaling through a selective binding to the Gα protein subunit. Our results support the concept of targeting and inhibiting the heterotrimeric G protein complex as an approach to treat certain pathologies involving simultaneous activation of several GPCRs and/or heterotrimeric G proteins.     

A constitutively active Gα subunit provides insights into the mechanism of G protein activation

The activation of Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a critical event underlying a variety of biological responses. Understanding how G proteins are activated will require structural and biochemical analyses of GPCRs complexed to their G protein partners, together with structure-function studies of Gα mutants that shed light on the different steps in the activation pathway. Previously, we reported that the substitution of a glycine for a proline at position 56 within the linker region connecting the helical and GTP-binding domains of a Gα chimera, designated αT*, yields a more readily exchangeable state for guanine nucleotides. Here we show that GDP-GTP exchange on αT*(G56P), in the presence of the light-activated GPCR, rhodopsin (R*), is less sensitive to the β1γ1 subunit complex than to wild-type αT*. We determined the X-ray crystal structure for the αT*(G56P) mutant and found that the G56P substitution leads to concerted changes that are transmitted to the conformationally sensitive switch regions, the α4-β6 loop, and the β6 strand. The α4-β6 loop has been proposed to be a GPCR contact site that signals to the TCAT motif and weakens the binding of the guanine ring of GDP, whereas the switch regions are the contact sites for the β1γ1 complex. Collectively, these biochemical and structural data lead us to suggest that αT*(G56P) may be adopting a conformation that is normally induced within Gα subunits by the combined actions of a GPCR and a Gβγ subunit complex during the G protein activation event.     

Suppression of Gαs synthesis by simvastatin treatment of vascular endothelial cells

These studies explore the effects of statins on cyclic AMP-modulated signaling pathways in vascular endothelial cells. We previously observed (Kou, R., Sartoretto, J., and Michel, T. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 14734-14743) that simvastatin treatment of endothelial cells leads to a marked decrease in PKA-modulated phosphorylation of the protein VASP. Here we show that long-term treatment of mice with simvastatin attenuates the vasorelaxation response to the β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol, without affecting endothelin-induced vasoconstriction or carbachol-induced vasorelaxation. We found that statin treatment of endothelial cells dose-dependently inhibits PKA activation as assessed by analyses of serine 157 VASP phosphorylation as well as Epac-mediated Rap1 activation. These effects of simvastatin are completely reversed by mevalonate and by geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, implicating geranylgeranylation as a critical determinant of the stain response. We used biochemical approaches as well as fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) methods with a cAMP biosensor to show that simvastatin treatment of endothelial cells markedly inhibits cAMP accumulation in response to epinephrine. Importantly, simvastatin treatment significantly decreases Gα(s) abundance, without affecting other Gα subunits. Simvastatin treatment does not influence Gα(s) protein stability, and paradoxically increases the abundance of Gα(s) mRNA. Finally, we found that simvastatin treatment inhibits Gα(s) translation mediated by Akt/mTOR/eIF4/4EBP. Taken together, these findings establish a novel mechanism by which simvastatin modulates β-adrenergic signaling in vascular wall, and may have implications for cardiovascular therapeutics.     

Differentiation of Human T Cells Alters Their Repertoire of G Protein α-Subunits

Because T cell differentiation leads to an expanded repertoire of chemokine receptors, a subgroup of G protein-coupled receptors, we hypothesized that the repertoire of G proteins might be altered in parallel. We analyzed the abundance of mRNA and/or protein of six G protein α-subunits in human CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell subsets from blood. Although most G protein α-subunits were similarly expressed in all subsets, the abundance of Gα_o, a protein not previously described in hematopoietic cells, was much higher in memory versus naive cells. Consistent with these data, activation of naive CD4⁺ T cells in vitro significantly increased the abundance of Gα_o in cells stimulated under nonpolarizing or T_H17 (but not T_H1 or T_H2)-polarizing conditions. In functional studies, the use of a chimeric G protein α-subunit, Gα_qo5, demonstrated that chemokine receptors could couple to Gα_o-containing G proteins. We also found that Gα_i1, another α-subunit not described previously in leukocytes, was expressed in naive T cells but virtually absent from memory subsets. Corresponding to their patterns of expression, siRNA-mediated knockdown of Gα_o in memory (but not naive) and Gα_i1 in naive (but not memory) CD4⁺ T cells inhibited chemokine-dependent migration. Moreover, although even in Gα_o- and Gα_i1-expressing cells mRNAs of these α-subunits were much less abundant than Gα_i2 or Gα_i3, knockdown of any of these subunits impaired chemokine receptor-mediated migration similarly. Together, our data reveal a change in the repertoire of Gα_i/o subunits during T cell differentiation and suggest functional equivalence among Gα_i/o subunits irrespective of their relative abundance.     

Suppression of Tumor Angiogenesis by G��13 Haploinsufficiency

Heterotrimeric G proteins are critical transducers of cellular signaling. Of the four families of G proteins, the physiological function of Gα₁₃ is less well understood. Gα₁₃ gene-deleted mice die at embryonic day ∼9.5. Here, we show that heterozygous Gα₁₃^+/− mice display defects in adult angiogenesis. Female Gα₁₃^+/− mice showed a higher number of immature follicles and a lower density of blood vessels in the mature corpus luteum compared with Gα₁₃^+/+ mice. Furthermore, implanted tumors grew slower in Gα₁₃^+/− host mice. These tumor tissues had many fewer blood vessels compared with those from Gα₁₃^+/+ host mice. Moreover, bone marrow-derived progenitor cells from Gα₁₃^+/+ mice rescued the failed growth of allografted tumors when reconstituted into irradiated Gα₁₃^+/− mice. Hence, Gα₁₃ is haploinsufficient for adult angiogenesis in both the female reproductive system and tumor angiogenesis.A structurally diverse repertoire of ligands, from photons to large peptides, activates G protein-coupled receptors to elicit their physiological functions (1). In turn, ligand-bound G protein-coupled receptors function as guanine nucleotide exchange factors, catalyzing the exchange of GDP bound on the Gα subunit with GTP in the presence of Gβγ and causing the dissociation of the Gα subunit from the Gβγ dimer to form two functional units (Gα and Gβγ) (2). Both Gα and Gβγ subunits signal to various cellular pathways. Based on sequence and functional homologies, G proteins are grouped into four families: G_s, G_i, G_q, and G₁₂ (3). Of these four subfamilies of G proteins, the physiological function of the G₁₂ subfamily is less well understood. In this family, there are two members, G₁₂ and G₁₃. Gα₁₂ knock-out mice appear normal (4). Gα₁₃ knock-out mice display embryonic lethality (embryonic day ∼9.5) (5). Gα₁₃^−/− mouse embryos have defective vascular systems (5). Endothelial cell-specific deletion of Gα₁₃ also results in vascular defect and embryonic lethality (6). The molecular basis that underlies the vascular defect observed in Gα₁₃^−/− mouse embryos has not been defined.Angiogenesis (formation of endothelium-lined blood vessels) is essential for organ growth in the embryo and for repair of wounded tissues in the adult (7, 8). An imbalance in angiogenesis contributes to the pathogenesis of numerous malignant, inflammatory, ischemic, infectious, and immune disorders and cancers (7, 8). Most angiogenesis events take place during embryonic development. In adult tissues, the majority of endothelial cells are quiescent, and angiogenesis occurs only rarely except in a few adult tissues (including ovary) that exhibit periodic and dynamic growth and regression (9–11). Under pathological conditions such as tumor growth, adult angiogenesis is induced. Tumor angiogenesis is the proliferation of a network of blood vessels that penetrates into cancerous growths (including implanted tumor tissues), supplying nutrients and oxygen and removing waste products. Solid tumors depend on angiogenesis for growth and metastasis in a hostile environment (12). Bone marrow is the origin of endothelial progenitor cells in the adult. Bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells are mobilized into peripheral blood and recruited to the foci of pathophysiological neovascularization and re-endothelialization, thereby contributing to vascular regeneration (13). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF),² the most critical factor for angiogenesis, is an important factor for the mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells from bone marrow (7, 8). Bone marrow transplantation experiments have demonstrated the incorporation of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells into foci of pathological neovascularization such as growing tumors, healing wounds, ischemic skeletal and cardiac muscles, and cornea receiving micropocket surgery (14–21).Here, we show that heterozygous Gα₁₃^+/− mice display defects in adult angiogenesis. We found that female Gα₁₃^+/− mice show a higher number of immature follicles and a lower density of blood vessels in the mature corpus luteum compared with Gα₁₃^+/+ mice. Furthermore, implanted tumors grew slower in Gα₁₃^+/− host mice. These tumor tissues had many fewer blood vessels compared with those from Gα₁₃^+/+ host mice. We also down-regulated Gα₁₃ in endothelial cells by RNA interference and show that defective migration and tube formation in response to VEGF likely contribute to the impaired angiogenesis. Moreover, bone marrow-derived cells from Gα₁₃^+/+ mice rescued the failed growth of allografted tumors when reconstituted into irradiated Gα₁₃^+/− mice. Our results demonstrate that Gα₁₃ is haploinsufficient for adult angiogenesis in both the female reproductive system and tumor angiogenesis. This role in adult angiogenesis provides a suitable system to further investigate the biochemical and physiological functions of Gα₁₃. Moreover, Gα₁₃ inhibition could be explored for anticancer drug development.     

Validation of a one-step PCR assay for the molecular identification of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto G1–G3 genotype

Molecular Biology Reports - The Italian National Reference Center for Echinococcosis (CeNRE, Sassari, Italy) set up a diagnostic protocol of “one-step-PCR” useful for the detection of...     

Therapeutic potential of β-arrestin- and G protein-biased agonists

Members of the seven-transmembrane receptor (7TMR), or G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), superfamily represent some of the most successful targets of modern drug therapy, with proven efficacy in the treatment of a broad range of human conditions and disease processes. It is now appreciated that β-arrestins, once viewed simply as negative regulators of traditional 7TMR-stimulated G protein signaling, act as multifunctional adapter proteins that regulate 7TMR desensitization and trafficking and promote distinct intracellular signals in their own right. Moreover, several 7TMR biased agonists, which selectively activate these divergent signaling pathways, have been identified. Here we highlight the diversity of G protein- and β-arrestin-mediated functions and the therapeutic potential of selective targeting of these in disease states.