Comparative mapping of Z-orthologous genes in vertebrates: implications for the evolution of avian sex chromosomes

Sex chromosomes of birds and mammals are highly differentiated and share several cytological features. However, comparative gene mapping reveals extensive conserved synteny between the chicken Z sex chromosome and human chromosome 9 but not the human X sex chromosome, implying an independent origin of avian and mammalian sex chromosomes. To better understand the evolution of the avian Z chromosome we analysed the synteny of chicken Z-linked genes in zebrafish, which is the best-mapped teleost genome so far. Existing zebrafish maps do not support the existence of an ancestral Z linkage group in the zebrafish genome, whereas mammalian X-linked genes show at least some degree of synteny conservation. This is consistent with in situ hybridisation mapping data in the freshwater pufferfish, Tetraodon nigroviridis where mammalian X-linked genes show a much higher degree of conserved synteny than human chromosome 9 or the avian Z chromosome. Collectively, these data argue in favour of a more recent evolution of the avian Z chromosome, compared with the mammalian X.     

Expression of X-linked genes in androgenetic,gynogenetic, and normal mouse preimplantation embryos

A quantitative RT-PCR approach has been used to examine the expression of a number of X-linked genes during preimplan-tation development of normal mouse embryos and in androgenetic and gynogenetic mouse embryos. The data reveal moderately reduced expression of the Prps1, Hprt, and Pdha1 mRNAs in androge-netic eight-cell and morula stage embryos, but not in androgenetic blastocysts. Pgk1 mRNA abundance was severely reduced in androgenones at the eight-cell and morula stages and remained reduced, but to a lesser degree, in androgenetic blastocysts. These data indicate that paternally inherited X chromosomes are at least partially repressed in androgenones, as they are in normal XX embryos, and that the degree of this repression is chromosome position-dependent or gene-dependent. Gynogenetic embryos expressed elevated amounts of some mRNAs at the morula and blas-tocyst stages, indicative of a delay in dosage compensation that may be chromosome position-dependent. The Xist RNA was expressed at a greater abundance in androgenones than in gynogenones at the eight-cell and morula stages, consistent with previous studies. Xist expression was observed in both and rogenones and gynogenones at the blas-tocyst stage. We conclude that the developmental arrest in early androgenones may be, in part, due to reduced expression of essential X-linked genes, particularly those near the X inactivation center, where as the developmental defects of gyno-genones and parthenogenones, by contrast, may be partially due to overexpression of X-linked genes in extraembryonic tissues, possibly those far-thest away from the X inactivation center. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Molecular studies of marsupial X chromosomes reveal limited sequence homology of mammalian X-linked genes

To explore the extent to which the X chromosome has been conserved during mammalian evolution, we compared six loci that are X-linked in the human genome with the corresponding genes of the North American marsupial, the Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana). Our analysis shows that in the opossum genome there are sequences highly homologous to those of human cDNAs for housekeeping genes, glucose-6-phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT), phosphoglycerate kinase A (PGK1), and alpha-galactosidase A (GLA). However, ornithine transcarbamylase and blood clotting Factor IX--tissue-specific genes that are X-linked in eutherians mammals--have no highly conserved homologs in the marsupial genome. By cloning opossum G6PD and HPRT, we found that these genes are X-linked in the opossum and that homologous sequences are limited to coding regions. As all genomic fragments hybridizing with the human GLA probe show dosage effects, it is likely that the opossum counterpart is X-linked. Finally, the pattern of hybridization suggests that the autosomal pseudogenes of HPRT and PGK1 in the opossum have remained highly homologous to the human X-linked genes.     

Localization of human X chromosomal mental retardation (MRX) genes in chicken and comparison with the chicken genome sequence data

In an ongoing study human X chromosomal mental retardation genes (MRX) were mapped in the chicken genome. Up to now the homologs of 13 genes were localized by FISH techniques. Four genes from HSAXp (TM4SF2, RSK2/RPS6KA3, NLGN4, ARX) map to GGA1q13-->q31, and seven genes from HSAXq (OPHN1, AGTR2, ARHGEF6, PAK3, FACL4/ACS4, FMR2, ATRX) to GGA4p. The gene-rich region of HSAXq28 proved to be much less conserved. GDI1 localized to GGA1pter and SLC6A8 to a mid-sized microchromosome. The order of the genes was determined from the newly available genome sequence data from chicken, which reveals exact colinearity between the genes in HSAXp and GGA1q13-->q31, but completely scrambled gene order between the genes with common synteny from HSAXq and GGA4p. This result supports the hypothesis that the human X chromosome is a real ancient autosomal linkage group.     

The human and mouse replication-dependent histone genes

The multigene family encoding the five classes of replication-dependent histones has been identified from the human and mouse genome sequence. The large cluster of histone genes, HIST1, on human chromosome 6 (6p21-p22) contains 55 histone genes, and Hist1 on mouse chromosome 13 contains 51 histone genes. There are two smaller clusters on human chromosome 1: HIST2 (at 1q21), which contains six genes, and HIST3 (at 1q42), which contains three histone genes. Orthologous Hist2 and Hist3 clusters are present on mouse chromosomes 3 and 11, respectively. The organization of the human and mouse histone genes in the HIST1 cluster is essentially identical. All of the histone H1 genes are in HIST1, which is spread over about 2 Mb. There are two large gaps (>250 kb each) within this cluster where there are no histone genes, but many other genes. Each of the histone genes encodes an mRNA that ends in a stemloop followed by a purine-rich region that is complementary to the 5' end of U7 snRNA. In addition to the histone genes on these clusters, only two other genes containing the stem-loop sequence were identified, a histone H4 gene on human chromosome 12 (mouse chromosome 6) and the previously described H2a.X gene located on human chromosome 11. Each of the 14 histone H4 genes encodes the same protein, and there are only three histone H3 proteins encoded by the 12 histone H3 genes in each species. In contrast, both the mouse and human H2a and H2b proteins consist of at least 10 non-allelic variants, making the complexity of the histone protein complement significantly greater than previously thought.     

Chromosomal localization of GABAA receptor subunit genes: relationship to human genetic disease

Hybridization of GABAA receptor probes to human chromosomes in situ and to DNA from sorted human chromosomes has localized the genes encoding a beta subunit and three isoforms of the alpha subunit. The alpha 2 and beta genes are both located on chromosome 4 in bands p12-p13 and may be adjacent. The alpha 1 gene is on chromosome 5 (bands q34-q35) and the alpha 3 gene is on the X chromosome. The alpha 3 locus was mapped also on the mouse X chromosome using genetic break-point analysis in an interspecies pedigree. The combined results locate the human alpha 3 gene within band Xq28, in a location that makes it a candidate gene for the X-linked form of manic depression.     

Characterization of the Bex gene family in humans, mice, and rats

To better understand the development of ventral mesencephalic dopamine neurons, we performed subtractive hybridization screens to find ventral mesencephalic genes expressed at rat embryonic day 10 when these neurons begin to differentiate. The most commonly identified genes in these screens were members of the Bex (Brain expressed X-linked) gene family, rat Bex1 (Rex3), and a novel gene, rat Bex4. After identifying these genes, we then sought to characterize the Bex gene family. Two additional novel Bex genes (human Bex5 and mouse Bex6) were discovered through genomic databases. Bex5 is present in humans and monkeys, but not rodents, while Bex6 exists in mice, but not humans. Bex4 and Bex5 are localized to the X chromosome, are expressed in brain, and are similar in sequence. Bex4 and Bex5 are 54% and 56% identical to human Bex3 (pHGR74, NADE). Mouse Bex6 is on chromosome 16 and is 67% identical to mouse Bex4. Human Bex gene expression was studied with tissue expression arrays probed with specific oligonucleotides. Human Bex1 and Bex2 have similar expression patterns in the central nervous system with high levels in pituitary, cerebellum, and temporal lobe, and Bex1 is widely expressed outside of the central nervous system with high expression in the liver. Human Bex4 is highly expressed in heart, skeletal muscle, and liver, while Bex3 and Bex5 are more widely expressed. The subcellular localization of the Bex proteins varies from nuclear (rat Bex1) to cytoplasmic (rat Bex3, human Bex5, and mouse Bex6) and to both nuclear and cytoplasmic (rat Bex2 and rat Bex4). Rat Bex3, rat Bex4, human Bex5, and mouse Bex6 are degraded by the proteasome, while rat Bex1 or Bex2 are not. Rat Bex3 protein can likely bind transition metals through a histidine-rich domain. Because this gene family was originally named Bex and because these genes are unified by sequence similarity and gene structure, we believe the Bex nomenclature should prevail over nomenclature based on function (NADE) that has not been extended to the other Bex genes. We conclude that the Bex gene family members are highly homologous but differ in their expression patterns, subcellular localization, and degradation by the proteasome.     

The mouse X-linked juvenile retinoschisis cDNA: expression in photoreceptors

Retinal photoreceptor cells are particularly vulnerable to degenerations that can eventually lead to blindness. Our purpose is to identify and characterize genes expressed specifically in photoreceptors in order to increase our understanding of the biochemistry and function of these cells, and then to use these genes as candidates for the sites of mutations responsible for degenerative retinal diseases. We have characterized a cDNA, a fragment of which (SR3.1) was originally isolated by subtractive hybridization of adult, photoreceptorless rd mouse retinal cDNAs from the cDNAs of normal mouse retina. The full-length sequence of this cDNA was determined from clones obtained by screening mouse retinal and eye cDNA libraries and by using the 5'- and 3'-RACE methods. Both Northern blot analysis and in situ hybridization showed that the corresponding mRNA is expressed in rod and cone photoreceptors. The gene encoding this cDNA was mapped to the X chromosome using an interspecific cross. Based on the nucleotide and amino acid sequences, as well as chromosome mapping, we determined that this gene is the mouse ortholog (Xlrs1) of the human X-linked juvenile retinoschisis gene (XLRS1). Analysis of the predicted amino acid sequence indicates that the Xlrs1 mRNA may encode a secretable, adhesion protein. Therefore, our data suggest that X-linked juvenile retinoschisis originates from abnormalities in a photoreceptor-derived adhesion protein.     

X‐chromosome‐located microRNAs in immunity: Might they explain male/female differences?

In this paper, we hypothesize that X chromosome-associated mechanisms, which affect X-linked genes and are behind the immunological advantage of females, may also affect X-linked microRNAs. The human X chromosome contains 10% of all microRNAs detected so far in the human genome. Although the role of most of them has not yet been described, several X chromosome-located microRNAs have important functions in immunity and cancer. We therefore provide a detailed map of all described microRNAs located on human and mouse X chromosomes, and highlight the ones involved in immune functions and oncogenesis. The unique mode of inheritance of the X chromosome is ultimately the cause of the immune disadvantage of males and the enhanced survival of females following immunological challenges. How these aspects influence X-linked microRNAs will be a challenge for researchers in the coming years, not only from an evolutionary point of view, but also from the perspective of disease etiology.     

An apparent excess of sex- and reproduction-related genes on the human X chromosome

We describe here the results of a search of Mendelian inheritance in man, GENDIAG and other sources which suggest that, in comparison with autosomes 1, 2, 3, 4 and 11, the X chromosome may contain a significantly higher number of sex- and reproduction-related (SRR) genes. A similar comparison between X-linked entries and a subset of randomly chosen entries from the remaining autosomes also indicates an excess of genes on the X chromosome with one or more mutations affecting sex determination (e.g. DAX1), sexual differentiation (e.g. androgen receptor) or reproduction (e.g. POF1). A possible reason for disproportionate occurrence of such genes on the X chromosome could be that, during evolution, the 'choice' of a particular pair of homomorphic chromosomes for specialization as sex chromosomes may be related to the number of such genes initially present in it or, since sex determination and sexual dimorphism are often gene dose-dependent processes, the number of such genes necessary to be regulated in a dose-dependent manner. Further analysis of these data shows that XAR, the region which has been added on to the short arm of the X chromosome subsequent to eutherian-marsupial divergence, has nearly as high a proportion of SRR genes as XCR, the conserved region of the X chromosome. These observations are consistent with current hypotheses on the evolution of sexually antagonistic traits on sex chromosomes and suggest that both XCR and XAR may have accumulated SRR traits relatively rapidly because of X linkage.     

Expansion of the complement receptor gene family. Identification in the mouse of two new genes related to the CR1 and CR2 gene family

Human cDNA probes encoding the C3b/C4b complement receptor, CR1, have been used to identify, in the mouse, two new genes which are related to CR1 but which appear to encode a different protein product. These new mouse genes, arbitrarily designated mouse genes X and Y, hybridize specifically to three different cDNA probes derived from human CR1. The degree of hybridization homology between the mouse X and Y genes suggests they are very closely related to one another; however, the chromosomal localization of the mouse X gene to chromosome 8 and the mouse Y gene to chromosome 1 indicates they are distinct gene sequences. The mRNA species detected with the X and/or Y (X/Y) sequences are approximately 2000 bases in length, but vary in both quantity and size depending upon the tissue analyzed. DNA sequence analysis of a cDNA specific for the X and Y sequences indicates the mature protein(s) will contain the 60 amino acid consensus repeat characteristic of a group of other proteins including CR1, the C3d receptor (CR2), H, C4 binding protein (C4bp), the interleukin 2 (Il 2) receptor and others. The identity of the mouse X and Y genes, and the function of the proteins which they encode, is not known; however, the small size of the mRNA and the tissue specific expression suggests they do not encode mouse CR1 or CR2 but instead encode a related protein (or proteins) which is expressed in a wide variety of mouse tissues.     

Evidence that the human X chromosome is enriched for male-specific but not female-specific genes

There is increasing evidence that X chromosomes have an unusual complement of genes, especially genes that have sex-specific expression. However, whereas in worm and fly the X chromosome has a dearth of male-specific genes, in mice genes that are uniquely expressed in spermatogonia are especially abundant on the X chromosome. Is this latter enrichment true for nongermline, male-specific genes in mammals, and is it found also for female-specific genes? Here, using SAGE data, we show (1) that tissue-specific genes tend to be more abundant on the human X chromosome, (2) that, controlling for this effect, genes expressed exclusively in prostate are enriched on the human X chromosome, and (3) that genes expressed exclusively in mammary gland and ovary are not so enriched. This we propose is consistent with Rice's model of the evolution of sexually antagonistic alleles.     

Segmental dataset and whole body expression data do not support the hypothesis that non-random movement is an intrinsic property of Drosophila retrogenes

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Several studies in Drosophila have shown excessive movement of retrogenes from the X chromosome to autosomes, and that these genes are frequently expressed in the testis. This phenomenon has led to several hypotheses invoking natural selection as the process driving male-biased genes to the autosomes. Metta and Schlotterer (BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10:114) analyzed a set of retrogenes where the parental gene has been subsequently lost. They assumed that this class of retrogenes replaced the ancestral functions of the parental gene, and reported that these retrogenes, although mostly originating from movement out of the X chromosome, showed female-biased or unbiased expression. These observations led the authors to suggest that selective forces (such as meiotic sex chromosome inactivation and sexual antagonism) were not responsible for the observed pattern of retrogene movement out of the X chromosome. RESULTS: We reanalyzed the dataset published by Metta and Schlotterer and found several issues that led us to a different conclusion. In particular, Metta and Schlotterer used a dataset combined with expression data in which significant sex-biased expression is not detectable. First, the authors used a segmental dataset where the genes selected for analysis were less testis-biased in expression than those that were excluded from the study. Second, sex-biased expression was defined by comparing male and female whole-body data and not the expression of these genes in gonadal tissues. This approach significantly reduces the probability of detecting sex-biased expressed genes, which explains why the vast majority of the genes analyzed (parental and retrogenes) were equally expressed in both males and females. Third, the female-biased expression observed by Metta and Schlotterer is mostly found for parental genes located on the X chromosome, which is known to be enriched with genes with female-biased expression. Fourth, using additional gonad expression data, we found that autosomal genes analyzed by Metta and Schlotterer are less up regulated in ovaries and have higher chance to be expressed in meiotic cells of spermatogenesis when compared to X-linked genes. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria used to select retrogenes and the sex-biased expression data based on whole adult flies generated a segmental dataset of female-biased and unbiased expressed genes that was unable to detect the higher propensity of autosomal retrogenes to be expressed in males. Thus, there is no support for the authors' view that the movement of new retrogenes, which originated from X-linked parental genes, was not driven by selection. Therefore, selection-based genetic models remain the most parsimonious explanations for the observed chromosomal distribution of retrogenes.