Release of cytokeratin-18 and -19 fragments (TPS and CYFRA 21-1) into the extracellular space during apoptosis

Serum fragments of cytokeratins-18 and -19 (measured as TPS and CYFRA 21-1, respectively) have traditionally been considered as markers of tumor proliferation, although the evidence is scarce for a causative relationship between proliferation and levels of TPS and CYFRA 21-1. We examined whether apoptosis might produce TPS and CYFRA 21-1 fragments. MCF-7 breast cancer cells were treated with mitomycin C or agonistic anti-CD95 antibody, and levels of TPS and CYFRA 21-1 in tissue culture supernatants were compared with the frequency of cells exhibiting the following markers of cell death: intracellular cytokeratin-18 cleavage, surface staining with annexin-V, propidium iodide uptake, DNA fragmentation. Twenty-four hours after inducing apoptosis, levels of TPS and CYFRA 21-1 were elevated > or = 4-fold in culture supernatants. Elevations in TPS and CYFRA 21-1 coincided with apoptosis measured by the first three cell death markers but preceded DNA fragmentation. These mitomycin C- and CD95-mediated elevations were completely inhibited by co-incubation with the caspase inhibitors Z-VAD.fmk and Z-IETD.fmk, respectively. We conclude that TPS and CYFRA 21-1 can be abundantly released into the extracellular space during the intermediate stage of epithelial cell apoptosis.     

How to express tumor markers in bronchoalveolar lavage

INTRODUCTION: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a fundamental technique in the diagnosis of different respiratory diseases including lung cancer. Tumor marker values can be determined in the BAL fluid, but controversy still exists about how to express the results. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the best method of expressing tumor markers in BAL, either referring to total proteins or volume of fluid recovered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, non-blind study was carried out. Seventy-six patients (72 men and 4 women) diagnosed with lung cancer and 17 subjects without respiratory disease were included. BAL was performed in all patients and the fluid retrieved was divided into two fractions: a bronchiolar fraction (F0) and an alveolar fraction (F1). Five tumor markers: cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) as well as total protein were measured in both fractions. The concentrations were expressed in relation to the volume of BAL fluid recovered (ng or mU/mL) and in milligrams of total protein of lavage fluid (ng or mU/mg TP). The SPSS 11.01 software was used for statistical analysis. Mann-Whitney U test and ROC curves were developed when significant differences were found. RESULTS: We found significant differences in the CYFRA 21-1 values in the two BAL fractions and in both ways of expressing its concentration; in SCC in F1 expressed in ng/mg TP; in TPA in F0 expressed in mU/mg TP; in TPS in both fractions expressed in mU/mg TP, and in NSE in both fractions in ng/mg TP. The markers that best differentiated tumors from controls (ROC curves) were CYFRA 21-1 in F0 and NSE in both fractions in ng/mg TP. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the concentrations of tumor markers in BAL expressed in relation to total protein were more effective than if expressed in mL of BAL fluid collected.     

CEA和CYFRA21-1在原发性肺癌诊断中的应用价值分析

目的:评价血清癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA)和细胞角蛋白19的片段(CYFRA21-1)水平对原发性肺癌的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2012年5月~2013年5月我科收治的329例肺癌患者和192例肺部良性病变患者的临床资料。结果:肺癌患者血清CEA或CYFRA21-1水平随着肺癌的分期呈现逐渐上升的趋势(P0.001,P0.01)。以血清CEA≥3.4μg/L作为诊断条件诊断肺癌的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预计值预计值分别为67%、62%和75.2%;以血清CYFRA-21≥5.0 ug/L作为诊断条件诊断原发性肺癌的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预计值预计值分别为48%、87%和86.3%;以血清CEA≥3.4 ug/L和CYFRA-21≥5.0 ug/L共同作为诊断条件推断原发性肺癌的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预计值预计值分别为48%、87%和86.3%;良性肺部疾病患者中血清CEA和CYFRA-21水平同时升高者只有2%。结论:血清CEA≥3.4 ug/L和CYFRA-21≥5.0 ug/L同时升高对肺癌有具有重要的诊断价值,可有效的鉴别原发性肺癌与其它良性病变。     

血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌辅助诊断中的应用

目的探讨血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌诊断中的临床价值。方法收集40例健康人、45例肺部良性疾病患者和90例肺癌患者,采用电化学发光分析检测患者血清中肿瘤标志物细胞角蛋白19(CYFRA21-1)、鳞状细胞癌相关抗原(SCC)和癌胚抗原(CEA),以及胃泌素释放肽前体(pro-GRP)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的含量。结果健康人组和肺部良性疾病患者组血清NSE、pro-GRP、CYFRA21-1、SCC和CEA水平较肺癌患者组水平低,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。NSE和pro-GRP在小细胞肺癌患者中的水平均明显高于其他类型的肺癌患者(P0.01),CYFRA21-1和SCC在鳞癌患者中的含量比其他类型肺癌患者高(P0.01)。联合检测此5种血清肿瘤标志物敏感性高于单独的肿瘤标志物(P0.01)。结论联合检测NSE、pro-GRP、CYFRA21-1、SCC和CEA可以提高肺癌诊断的灵敏度。     

多种血清肿瘤标志物联合检测对肺癌诊断的临床意义分析

目的:探讨CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP联合检测对肺癌的诊、诊断的敏感度以及特异性。方法:对我院收治的确诊为肺癌的患者选取120例作为A组,同期选择肺部良性病变患者61例作为B组,以及50例健康体检患者作为C组,将三组研究对象分别进行CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP的检测。结果:A组患者CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP的血清中含量明显高于B组以及C组(P<0.05);五种标记物联合检测的敏感度明显高于单一标志物的敏感度(P<0.05),但其特异性有明显的降低(P<0.05)。结论:采用CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP联合检测,对肺癌的早期诊断以及治疗预后有较好的指导作用。     

血清及胸腔积液中CA19-9、SCC-Ag及CYFRA21-1对肺癌诊断意义的对比研究

目的:探讨肺癌患者血清及胸腔积液中的糖蛋白抗原19-9(CA19-9)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)和细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)对肺癌的诊断意义。方法:选取2016年1月到2017年6月在我院接受治疗的肺癌患者67例作为肺癌组,另选取我院同期收治的肺良性病变患者55例纳入良性病变组。采用电化学发光法检测并对比两组患者血清及胸腔积液中的CA19-9、SCC-Ag和CYFRA21-1水平,比较所有研究对象血清及胸腔积液中CA19-9、SCC-Ag和CYFRA21-1的阳性率并分析其诊断价值。结果:肺癌组患者血清及胸腔积液中的CA19-9、SCC-Ag和CYFRA21-1水平显著高于良性病变组,有统计学差异(P0.05)。CA19-9、SCC-Ag和CYFRA21-1在胸腔积液中的阳性率高于在血清中的阳性率,有统计学差异(P0.05)。胸腔积液中CA19-9、SCC-Ag和CYFRA21-1单项检测对肺癌的灵敏度显著高于血清检测,血清及胸腔积液中CA19-9、SCC-Ag和CYFRA21-1三项联合检测的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值均高于单项检测,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:肺癌患者血清及胸腔积液中CA19-9、SCC-Ag和CYFRA21-1呈现高表达,三项指标联合检测可提高诊断肺癌的灵敏度、特异性和阳性预测值。     

CYFRA 21-1 in non-small cell lung cancer--standardisation and application during diagnosis

There is no ideal tumour marker at present. The clinical application of CYFRA 21-1 is possible once a thorough standardisation process is carried out. Standardisation is achieved by determining the reference range in asymptomatic population, benign and malignant lung diseases, and benign and malignant diseases of other organs. Furthermore, it depends on knowledge of research population characteristics, patient medical histories and individual diagnostic procedure results, the size of research target samples and the clinically defined control groups. The cut-off level of CYFRA 21-1 for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is 1.72 ng/mL in the Croatian population. It is based on the clinically applicable sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 95% in benign lung diseases. The cut-off value is verified by clinical findings. For clinicians the level of CYFRA 21-1 is an early sign of NSCLC in relation to all the benign lung diseases and all the benign diseases of other organs, of which it was confirmed that they can influence the above level, provided that NSCLC is verified using standard diagnostic methods. The level of CYFRA 21-1 is also influenced by the time of sampling in relation to other diagnostic invasive procedures. The marker is clinically applicable if clinical findings verify it; otherwise, it is useless. This research has involved 343 healthy persons, 474 patients with a benign disease and 4440 patients with a malignant disease, 2453 of whom suffer from NSCLC. The sensitivity of CYFRA 21-1 in NSCLC is 78%, in squamous cell lung cancer (SQC) 84.6%, in adenocarcinomas (AD) 74.3% and in large cell lung cancer (LCC) 75.3%. The level of CYFRA 21-1 differs significantly between healthy persons, benign and malignant diseases (p<10(-3)). There are differences between the three histological types of NSCLC (p<10(-6)) and according to T and N (p<10(-3)). The level of CYFRA 21-1 prompts clinicians to repeat the clinical procedure during diagnosis, and helps to detect the disease earlier and implement treatment in NSCLC. We have achieved high concordance between marker findings and clinical diagnostic.     

Fine-Needle Aspirates CYFRA 21-1 is a Useful Tumor Marker for Detecting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients

Introduction

To assess whether the value of CYFRA21-1 in the aspirates of ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) can contribute to improving the performances of US-FNAB in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node (LN) metastasis in breast cancer patients.

Methods

US-FNAB was performed in 156 axillary LNs in 152 breast cancer patients (mean age: 51.4 years, range: 17–92 years). Concentrations of CYFRA21-1 were measured from washouts of the syringe used during US-FNAB. Tumor marker concentrations, US-FNAB, intraoperative sentinel node biopsy (SNB), and surgical pathology results were reviewed and analyzed. For comparison, the values of CEA and CA15-3 were also measured from washouts.

Results

Among the 156 LNs, 75 (48.1%) were benign, and 81 (51.9%) were metastases. Mean concentrations of CYFRA21-1 were significantly higher in metastasis compared to benign LNs (P<0.001). US-FNAB combined to CYFRA21-1 showed significantly higher sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy compared to US-FNAB alone (all values P<0.05). All diagnostic indices of US-FNAB combined to CYFRA21-1 were significantly higher compared to US-FNAB combined with CEA or CA15-3 (all P<0.001). Of the 28 metastatic LNs which showed metastasis on SNB, CYFRA21-1 showed higher positive rate of 75.0% (CEA or CA15-3∶60.7%, P = 0.076).

Conclusion

Measuring CYFRA 21-1 concentrations from US-FNAB aspirates improves sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy of US-FNAB alone, and may contribute to reducing up to 75.0% of unnecessary intraoperative SNB. Compared to CEA or CA15-3, CYFRA21-1 shows significantly higher performances when combined to US-FNAB in the preoperative diagnosis of LN metastasis in breast cancer patients.     

Simultaneous determination of urinary CEA, ferritin and TPA in Egyptian bladder cancer patients.

Urinary carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), ferritin (Fer) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) were determined in 328 cases (106 with bladder cancer, 152 with non-malignant urinary tract disease and 70 healthy controls). CEA was determined by the kit supplied by Roche Diagnostica (CEA EIA Doumab 60), ferritin by the Tandem-E Fer kit supplied by Hybritech and TPA by the Prolifigen TPA-IRMA kit supplied by Sangtec Medical. The results of this work revealed that combined determination of urine CEA and Fer, CEA and TPA or Fer and TPA showed higher sensitivity than determination of the individual markers. There was no significant difference between combined and individual marker determination with respect to false positivity in non-malignant urinary tract diseases. At 97% specificity, the sensitivities of urine CEA, Fer and TPA were 82.1%, 71.7% and 90.6%, respectively, while combined urine CEA & Fer, CEA & TPA and Fer & TPA showed sensitivities of 92.5%, 99.1% and 98.1%, respectively. When the specificity was related to the entire non-cancer group (patients with benign urinary tract diseases and normal controls), some reduction in the sensitivities of the combined markers was noted compared to the normal group only. In conclusion, combined determination of urine markers is superior to determination of individual markers in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.     

Preoperative CEA, NSE, SCC, TPA and CYFRA 21.1 serum levels as prognostic indicators in resected non-small cell lung cancer.

In 62 patients affected by resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) submitted to radical surgery we evaluated the prognostic significance of CEA, NSE, SCC, TPA, and CYFRA 21.1 serum levels at diagnosis, as well as the predictive ability of these tumor markers with respect to histological type and pathological stage. The group was composed of 56 male and 6 female patients; the median age was 62 years (range 29-73 years). Thirty-four patients had a histological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma and 28 of squamous cell carcinoma; with regard to pathological stage, 32 patients had stage 1, 4 patients stage II and 23 patients stage IIIA disease. A good predictive ability with respect to histological type was obtained with SCC serum levels; as for pathological stage, TPA and CYFRA 21.1 were found to have moderate predictive ability. In this series of patients, at a median follow-up of 55 months after surgery, we found that both TPA and CYFRA 21.1 serum levels at diagnosis were reliable predictors of overall survival, high values of these markers being associated with a worse prognosis.     

Diagnostic value of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor as a tumor marker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

We assessed the diagnostic value of circulating VEGF as a tumor marker in patients with lung cancer and compared its clinical utility with that of other markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA). One hundred and sixty non-small cell lung cancer patients and 70 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Circulating VEGF was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The serum concentrations of both CEA and CYFRA were measured by means of immunoradiometric assays. The diagnostic value of plasma VEGF (VEGFp) was better than that of CYFRA and similar to that of CEA. When the diagnostic value of VEGFp and CEA for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was compared, the two markers proved to have nearly equal discriminatory power. In diagnosing squamous cell carcinoma, VEGFp showed less discrimination than CYFRA. When the diagnostic value of VEGFp was analyzed for stage I adenocarcinoma patients, VEGFp was slightly more discriminatory than CEA. The combination assay of VEGFp and CEA had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 60% at a cutoff of 104.4 pg/mL for VEGFp and 5.2 ng/mL for CEA. The combination of VEGF and CEA was superior to CEA alone in the early diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the lung.     

CYFRA 21-1: A potential molecular marker for noninvasive differential diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of bladder

Establishing CYFRA 21-1 detection for noninvasive differential diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma (UC) of bladder would help to improve assessment and follow-up of patients, as well as to improve screening of high-risk groups. The study group comprised of 147 subjects including 72 patients with UC of bladder, 75 controls and 17 follow-up cases. The levels of CYFRA 21-1 in serum, urine and urinary cell lysate were estimated by high sensitivity ELISA. Our results indicate that urinary CYFRA 21-1 provides a high value of overall sensitivity for UC of bladder and is also useful even for detection of low grade tumors that might indicate possible earlier detection and treatment administration.     

Early CYFRA 21-1 variation predicts tumor response to chemotherapy and survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

We have evaluated CYFRA 21-1 serum level variations as an indicator of tumor response and survival in 44 consecutive patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with induction chemotherapy (IC). Irrespective of the initial CYFRA 21-1 serum concentration, a more than 65% decrease in the serum level after the first chemotherapy course was significantly predictive of an objective tumor response (p = 0.0022). In addition, a more than 80% decrease in this level significantly predicted a better disease-free survival (p = 0.039). In patients with initial CYFRA 21-1 serum levels > 3.3 ng/mL (n = 29), a more than 80% decrease after the first IC course was the most significant predictor of overall survival (p = 0.025) in a Cox analysis including initial staging, tumor response and surgery. We conclude that early monitoring of CYFRA 21-1 serum levels may be a useful prognostic tool for tumor response and survival in stage III NSCLC patients treated by induction chemotherapy.     

肺癌患者血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的检测及临床意义

目的探讨外周血癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的检测对肺癌的诊断、病理分型和疗效判断的临床用价值。方法采用化学发光法检测了62例肺癌患者、54例良性肺部疾病患者、36例健康人、40例肺癌患者手术前后血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的水平。结果肺癌患者手术前血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的含量明显高于良性肺部疾病组及正常对照组(P0.01)。鳞癌组、腺癌组和小细胞癌组之间肿瘤标志物CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE水平差异有统计学意义。CEA阳性率以腺癌组最高(84%),CYFRA21-1阳性率以鳞癌组最高(85.2%),NSE阳性率以小细胞癌组最高(80.0%)。手术治疗后未复发转移组CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE水平低于术前,而复发转移组与术前比变化不显著(P0.05)。结论血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的检测对不同病理类型肺癌患者的诊断、病情检测及疗效判断有较好的临床参考价值。     

血清CEA、CA19-9、CYFRA21-1与结直肠腺癌的相关性分析

目的:探究血清癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA)、糖类抗原19-9、细胞角蛋白19片段(cytokeratin19 fragements,CYFRA21-1)与结直肠腺癌的病理相关性。方法:选择于我院接受治疗的80例结直肠腺癌患者为病例组,选择同期于我院接受治疗的50例良性结直肠病变患者为良性对照组,选择我院体格检查的50例健康个体为对照组,分别采集三组个体的血样并进行CEA、CA19-9以及CYFRA21-1水平的检测,并比对三组个体上述因子阳性表达率、因子水平,同时分析三种因子同结直肠腺癌患者TNM分期相关性,最后探究三种因子对结直肠腺癌的诊断价值。结果:(1)以CEA≥2.805μg/L、CA19-9≥39 U/m L、CYFR21-1≥3.3 ng/mL为临界值,结果显示病例组CEA阳性率51.25%,CA19-9阳性率31.25%,CYFR21-1阳性率40.00%,明显高于良性组的10.00%、20.00%和10.00%,高于对照组的8.00%、12.00%和2.00%(P<0.05);(2)比较显示病例组患者的CEA、CA19-9以及CYFR21-1水平明显高于良性对照组以及对照组(P<0.05),良性对照组CEA、CA19-9以及CYFR21-1水平明显高于对照组(P<0.05);(3)比较显示IV期结直肠腺癌患者CEA、CA19-9以及CYFRA21-1水平明显高于III期以及I+II期(P<0.05),III期三种因子水平明显高于I+II期(P<0.05);(4)CEA对结直肠腺癌诊断一致性71.25%,灵敏度65.00%,特异度90.00%;CA19-9诊断一致性46.25%,灵敏度35.00%,特异度80.00%;CYFRA21-1诊断一致性55.00%,灵敏度46.67%,特异度80.00%;联合诊断一致性95.00%,灵敏度95.00%,特异度95.00%。结论:血清CEA、CA19-9以及CYFRA21-1对结直肠腺癌具有较明确的诊断价值,不同病理分期患者中表达差异明显,可以考虑将联合诊断作为结直肠腺癌鉴别方式之一,推广于临床中。     

Use of tumor markers in the management of head and neck cancer

Serologic tumor markers have been evaluated in the diagnosis, management and follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer. However, to the authors' knowledge no tumor marker has yet been shown to be useful for monitoring the response to chemotherapy in this type of disease, in particular for undifferentiated tumors. The pretreatment levels of CEA, TPA, SCC and ferritin were evaluated in 98 patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Of this group 64 patients were studied sequentially every month during planned chemotherapy and three weeks after treatment using standard commercial kits. The results showed the following sensitivity values: TPA 50%, CEA 36%, SCC 34% and ferritin 19%. The incidence and magnitude of the marker elevations were correlated with the extent of disease. In patients with squamous cell cancer SCC and CEA were elevated (by 68% and 54%, respectively) in tumors with good differentiation (G1), but only by 13% (both markers) in tumors classified as poorly differentiated (G3). CEA, SCC and ferritin serum levels were not correlated with response to chemotherapy, while TPA values correlated with the clinical response to treatment in 100% of patients with undifferentiated cancer and in 75% of those with squamous cell cancer. Our data indicate that in patients with head and neck cancer TPA appears to be a sensitive marker, followed in decreasing order of sensitivity by CEA, SCC and ferritin. However, SCC and CEA seem to be the most suitable markers for squamous cell cancer and in particular for more differentiated tumors (G1). Finally, TPA has proved to be a useful marker for monitoring the response to chemotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer, in particular for undifferentiated tumors.     

肺癌肿瘤标志物的临床意义及研究进展

肺癌血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌的早期筛查、诊断、疗效评价、复发及预后预测等方面有重要的指导意义。本研究对目前临床常用的癌胚抗原（CEA）、神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）、细胞角蛋白19片段抗原（CYFRA21—1）、鳞状细胞癌相关抗原（SCC—Ag）、乳酸脱氢酶（LDH）5种肺癌相关血清肿瘤标志物的临床意义及研究进展进行综述。     

NSE、CEA 和CYFRA21-1 测定对胸腔积液的诊断价值

目的:探讨神经元烯醇化酶(NSE)、癌胚抗原(CEA)和细胞角蛋白19(CYFRA21-1)测定对胸腔积液的诊断价值。方法:选择我院2009年4月～2011年9月收治的胸腔积液患者89例作为研究对象,按照胸腔积液性质分为两组,良性组47例,恶性组42例,对两组的NSE、CEA和CYFRA21-1测定结果进行比较分析。结果:恶性组患者血清和胸腔积液中NSE、CEA和CYFRA21-1水平均明显高于良性组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);NSE、CEA和CYFRA21-1联合检测对恶性胸腔积液的敏感性均明显高于单独NSE、CEA和CYFRA21-1检测,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:NSE、CEA和CYFRA21-1测定对胸腔积液具有临床诊断价值,且三者联合检测能够明显提高诊断敏感性。     

Expression Profile of Three Splicing Factors in Pleural Cells Based on the Underlying Etiology and Its Clinical Values in Patients with Pleural Effusion

Splicing factors (SFs) are involved in oncogenesis or immune modulation, the common underlying processes giving rise to pleural effusion (PE). The expression profiles of three SFs (HNRNPA1, SRSF1, and SRSF3) and their clinical values have never been assessed in PE. The three SFs (in pellets of PE) and conventional tumor markers were analyzed using PE samples in patients with PE (N = 336). The sum of higher–molecular weight (Mw) forms of HNRNPA1 (Sum-HMws-HNRNPA1) and SRSF1 (Sum-HMws-SRSF1) and SRSF3 levels were upregulated in malignant PE (MPE) compared to benign PE (BPE); they were highest in cytology-positive MPE, followed by tuberculous PE and parapneumonic PE. Meanwhile, the lowest-Mw HNRNPA1 (LMw-HNRNPA1) and SRSF1 (LMw-SRSF1) levels were not upregulated in MPE. Sum-HMws-HNRNPA1, Sum-HMws-SRSF1, and SRSF3, but neither LMw-HNRNPA1 nor LMw-SRSF1, showed positive correlations with cancer cell percentages in MPE. The detection accuracy for MPE was high in the order of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, 85%), Sum-HMws-HNRNPA1 (76%), Sum-HMws-SRSF1 (68%), SRSF3, cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1), LMw-HNRNPA1, and LMw-SRSF1. Sum-HMws-HNRNPA1 detected more than half of the MPE cases that were undetected by cytology and CEA. Sum-HMws-HNRNPA1, but not other SFs or conventional tumor markers, showed an association with longer overall survival among patients with MPE receiving chemotherapy. Our results demonstrated different levels of the three SFs with their Mw-specific profiles depending on the etiology of PE. We suggest that Sum-HMws-HNRNPA1 is a supplementary diagnostic marker for MPE and a favorable prognostic indicator for patients with MPE receiving chemotherapy.