Differing responses of G2-related genes during differentiation of HL60 cells induced by TPA or DMSO

Differentiation leads to the cessation of cellular proliferation, but little is known about the molecular mechanisms of growth arrest. We compared the effect of two differentiation inducers, 12-o-tetradecanoyl 13-acetate (TPA) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) on both the cell-cycle and the modulation of G2-related genes in synchronized HL60 cells. TPA treatment of HL60 cells resulted in G1 arrest within 24 h. In contrast, the cell cycling of DMSO-treated cells was initially accelerated and they progressed to the second cycle before accumulating in the G1 phase. Expression of cyclin B, cdc25, wee1 and cdc2 was studied during cell cycle arrest by Northern blot hybridization. Expression of cyclin B, cdc25 and cdc2 fluctuated in association with cell cycle progression towards the G2/M phase, while wee1 expression remained constant in untreated cells. These four genes were highly expressed in TPA-treated cells for the first 12 h, but drastic down-regulation was seen at 18 h and expression became undetectable after 24 h. In contrast, no remarked changes of gene expression were seen in DMSO-treated cells. These findings suggest that cell cycle progression along with the initial process of differentiation in response to TPA differs from the response to DMSO and that the down-regulation of cdc2 expression by TPA-treated HL60 cells contributes to endorsement of G1 arrest.     

Effects of Cyclic AMP on Components of the Cell Cycle Machinery Regulating DNA Synthesis in Cultured Astrocytes

Cyclic AMP is a second messenger for various hormones that inhibits cell multiplication and DNA synthesis in cultured astrocytes. We examined the effects of increasing intracellular cyclic AMP on the catalytic (cdks) and regulatory (cyclins and ckis) components of cyclin-dependent protein kinases, which regulate progression of the cell cycle before completion of DNA synthesis, in primary cultured astrocytes and in an astrocytic cell line C.LT.T.1.1. The amount of cdk4 changed little during the cell cycle and was not affected by cyclic AMP. There was little cdk1 and cdk2 in quiescent cells, and their expression increased during the G1-S phases. Cyclic AMP strongly inhibited cdk1 and cdk2 expression. Transforming growth factor beta also inhibited cdk1 expression in primary astrocytes. Cyclic AMP did not affect the two ckis p27KIP1 and p21CIP1. There was little cyclin D1 in quiescent cells, but it increased during the G1 phase and was reduced by cyclic AMP. Cyclin E increased during the G1-S phases and was not affected by cyclic AMP in primary astrocytes. The amount of cyclin A was low in quiescent cells and increased during the G1-S phases. Expression of its mRNA and protein was inhibited by cyclic AMP. The protein kinase activities associated with complexes of cyclins and cdks were increased by growth factors and prevented by cyclic AMP. We conclude that cyclic AMP inhibits progression of the cell cycle in astrocytes at least by preventing the expression of the regulatory subunits, cyclins D1 and A, and catalytic subunits, cdk1 and cdk2, of cyclin-regulated protein kinases. Key Words: Cyclin-dependent protein kinases-Glial cells-Cyclic AMP.     

Patterns of expression of cyclins A, B1, D, E and cdk 2 in preimplantation mouse embryos

Cell cycle regulatory proteins have been characterized in somatic cells and exhibit phase-specific expression patterns. Changes in expression of these regulatory proteins have not been clearly characterized in early preimplantation mouse embryos. This study utilized indirect immunofluorescence to determine the expression pattern of G1/S phase cyclins D and E; S, G2/M phase cyclins A and B1, and cdk 2 during the first three cell cycles of mouse embryo development. Cyclin D demonstrated low expression throughout the first cell cycle but had a somatic-like pattern of expression in cycles 2 and 3 with peak expression at G1 declining through S phase to a low during G2. Cyclin E was present at peak levels in G1 declining through S to a low in G2 during both the first and third cell cycles, but remained at moderate levels during the entire second cell cycle. Cyclin A was maintained at moderate levels throughout the first two cell cycles but showed a somatic-like pattern with a low level in G1 increasing during S phase with peak levels during G2 of the third cell cycle. Cyclin B consistently demonstrated a pattern opposite to a somatic G2/M cyclin, with peak levels in G1 declining through S phase to a low in G2 during each of the three cell cycles examined. Cdk 2 was present at consistent levels during G1 and S phases of all three cell cycles declining slightly in G2.     

Cyclin gene expression and growth control in normal and neoplastic human breast epithelium

Recent advances in defining the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle control in eukaryotes provide a basis for beter understanding the hormonal control of cell proliferation in normal and neoplastic breast epithelium. It is now clear that a number of critical steps in cell cycle progression are controlled by families of serine/threonine kinases, the cdks. These kinases are activated by interactions with various cyclin gene products which form the regulatory subunits of the kinase complexes. Several families of cyclins control cell cycle progression in G₁ phase, cyclins C, D and E, or in S, G₂ and mitosis, cyclins A and B. Recent studies have defined the expression and regulation of cyclin genes in normal breast epithelial cells and in breast cancer cell lines. Following growth arrest of T-47D breast cancer cells by serum deprivation restimulation with insulin results in sequential induction of cyclin genes. Cyclin D1 mRNA increases within 1 h of mitogenic stimulation and is followed by increased expression of cyclins D3 and E in G₁ phase, cyclin A in late G₁/early S phase and cyclin B1 in G₂. Similar results were observed following epidermal growth factor stimulation of normal breast epithelial cells. Other hormones—oestrogens and progestins—and growth factors—insulin-like investigated for their effects on G₁ cyclin gene expression. In all cases there was an excellent correlation between the induction of cyclin D1 mRNA and subsequent entry into S phase. Furthermore, growth inhibition by antioestrogens and concurrent G₁ arrest were preceded by an acute decrease in cyclin D1 gene expression. These observations suggest a likely role for cyclin D1 in mediating many of the known hormonal effects on cell proliferation in breast epithelial cells.     

Growth factor, steroid, and steroid antagonist regulation of cyclin gene expression associated with changes in T-47D human breast cancer cell cycle progression.

Cyclins and proto-oncogenes including c-myc have been implicated in eukaryotic cell cycle control. The role of cyclins in steroidal regulation of cell proliferation is unknown, but a role for c-myc has been suggested. This study investigated the relationship between regulation of T-47D breast cancer cell cycle progression, particularly by steroids and their antagonists, and changes in the levels of expression of these genes. Sequential induction of cyclins D1 (early G1 phase), D3, E, A (late G1-early S phase), and B1 (G2 phase) was observed following insulin stimulation of cell cycle progression in serum-free medium. Transient acceleration of G1-phase cells by progestin was also accompanied by rapid induction of cyclin D1, apparent within 2 h. This early induction of cyclin D1 and the ability of delayed administration of antiprogestin to antagonize progestin-induced increases in both cyclin D1 mRNA and the proportion of cells in S phase support a central role for cyclin D1 in mediating the mitogenic response in T-47D cells. Compatible with this hypothesis, antiestrogen treatment reduced the expression of cyclin D1 approximately 8 h before changes in cell cycle phase distribution accompanying growth inhibition. In the absence of progestin, antiprogestin treatment inhibited T-47D cell cycle progression but in contrast did not decrease cyclin D1 expression. Thus, changes in cyclin D1 gene expression are often, but not invariably, associated with changes in the rate of T-47D breast cancer cell cycle progression. However, both antiestrogen and antiprogestin depleted c-myc mRNA by > 80% within 2 h. These data suggest the involvement of both cyclin D1 and c-myc in the steroidal control of breast cancer cell cycle progression.     

Expression of cyclins and cdks throughout murine carcinogenesis.

The overexpression and/or amplification of cell cycle regulating genes is an important factor in the progression of cancer. Recent attention has been focused on several cyclin and cdks genes whose expression were increased in many types of tumor. In this study, we investigated the expression kinetics of cyclins A, B, D1, E and cdks 1, 2, 4, 6 by RT-PCR coupled with densitometry and correlated to the growth fraction (percentage of S cells). This analysis was performed using an experimental murine leukemic model, generated by in vivo administration of murine clonogenic cells Wehi-3b injected into balb-c mice. Differential expression of cyclins and cdks was observed between normal and tumoral cells with different patterns of expression between G1 and G2M cyclins-cdks. G1 cyclins cdks expression was significantly increased in tumor cells when compared to normal cells. In the same manner, G2M cyclins cdks expression was only observed in tumor cells at a lower level than for G1 cyclins cdks, but not detected in normal cells. These differences correlated with the growth fraction for both the G1 cyclins cdks (r = 0.91, 0.94, 0.85, 0.90 and 0.96 for cyclin D1, cyclin E, cdk2, cdk4 and cdk6, respectively) and the G2M cyclins cdks (r = 0.96, 0.97 and 0.93 for cyclins A, B and cdkl respectively). Analysis of cyclins cdks expression kinetics during tumoral progression shows that cyclins A, B and cdkl were expressed from the 12th day on of disease, increased until the death of the animals and correlated with the growth fraction (r = 0.94, 0.95 and 0.97 for cyclins A, B and cdk1 respectively) (n = 20). Overexpression of other cyclins cdks were observed, from the 6th day on for cyclin D1, the 12th day for cdk2 and cdk4, the 15th day for cdk6 and the 20th day for cyclin E. These increases persisted during tumoral progression and correlated with the growth fraction (r = 0.85, 0.94, 0.93, 0.96, and 0.98 for cyclin D1, cyclin E, cdk2, cdk4 and cdk6, respectively) (n = 20). Our results demonstrated that G1 and G2-M cyclins cdks mRNA levels were increased at approximately the same time of maximal tumor growth. Only cyclin D1 overexpression occured at the initiation of tumoral development, and could therefore be considered as an early marker of cell proliferation.     

Increased G1 cyclin/cdk activity in cells overexpressing the candidate oncogene, MCT-1.

We have recently identified a novel candidate oncogene, MCT-1, in the HUT 78 T-cell line. When overexpressed in NIH3T3 fibroblasts, the MCT-1 gene shortens the G1 phase of the cell cycle and promotes anchorage-independent growth. Progression of cells through a late G1 phase restriction point is regulated by G1 cyclins whose phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma gene product facilitates entry into S phase. Deregulated expression of G1 cyclins and their cognate cdk partners is often found in human tumor cells. In order to address the potential relationship of MCT-1 to cell cycle regulatory molecules, we analyzed the ability of MCT-1 overexpression to modulate cdk4 and cdk6 kinase activity in NIH3T3 fibroblasts constitutively overexpressing MCT-1. We observed an increase in the kinase activity of both cdk4 and cdk6 in asynchronously growing transformed cells compared with the parent cells. This increased kinase activity was accompanied by an elevated level of cyclin D1 protein and increased G1 cyclin/cdk complex formation. We also observed a correlation between increased protein levels of MCT-1 with cyclin D1 expression in a panel of lymphoid cell lines derived from T-cell malignancies. These results demonstrate that constitutive expression of MCT-1 is associated with deregulation of protein kinase-mediated G1 phase checkpoints.     

Antiproliferative action of valproate is associated with aberrant expression and nuclear translocation of cyclin D3 during the C6 glioma G1 phase

Cell cycle progression is tightly regulated by cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks) and related inhibitory phophatases. Here, we employed mitotic selection to synchronize the C6 glioma cell cycle at the start of the G1 phase and mapped the temporal regulation of selected cyclins, cdks and inhibitory proteins throughout the 12 h of G1 by immunoblot analysis. The D-type cyclins, D3 and D1, were differentially expressed during the C6 glioma G1 phase. Cyclin D1 was up-regulated in the mid-G1 phase (4-6 h) while cyclin D3 expression emerged only in late G1 (9-12 h). The influence of the anticonvulsant agent valproic acid (VPA) on expression of cyclins and related proteins was determined, since its teratogenic potency has been linked to cell cycle arrest in the mid-G1 phase. Exposure of C6 glioma to VPA induced a marked up-regulation of cyclin D3 and decreased expression of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen. In synchronized cell populations, increased expression of cyclin D3 by VPA was detected in the mid-G1 phase (3-5 h). Immunocytochemical localization demonstrated rapid intracellular translocation of cyclin D3 to the nucleus following VPA exposure, suggesting that VPA-induced cell cycle arrest may be mediated by precocious activation of cyclin D3 in the G1 phase.     

Increased Expression of Cyclin D2 during Multiple States of Growth Arrest in Primary and Established Cells

Cyclin D2 is a member of the family of D-type cyclins that is implicated in cell cycle regulation, differentiation, and oncogenic transformation. To better understand the role of this cyclin in the control of cell proliferation, cyclin D2 expression was monitored under various growth conditions in primary human and established murine fibroblasts. In different states of cellular growth arrest initiated by contact inhibition, serum starvation, or cellular senescence, marked increases (5- to 20-fold) were seen in the expression levels of cyclin D2 mRNA and protein. Indirect immunofluorescence studies showed that cyclin D2 protein localized to the nucleus in G₀, suggesting a nuclear function for cyclin D2 in quiescent cells. Cyclin D2 was also found to be associated with the cyclin-dependent kinases CDK2 and CDK4 but not CDK6 during growth arrest. Cyclin D2-CDK2 complexes increased in amounts but were inactive as histone H1 kinases in quiescent cells. Transient transfection and needle microinjection of cyclin D2 expression constructs demonstrated that overexpression of cyclin D2 protein efficiently inhibited cell cycle progression and DNA synthesis. These data suggest that in addition to a role in promoting cell cycle progression through phosphorylation of retinoblastoma family proteins in some cell systems, cyclin D2 may contribute to the induction and/or maintenance of a nonproliferative state, possibly through sequestration of the CDK2 catalytic subunit.     

D cyclins in lymphocytes.

BACKGROUND: D cyclins are essential for the progression of cells through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. There are three distinct D cyclins. Cyclin D1 has been shown to be expressed by many different types of cells but not by lymphocytes. Cyclins D2 and D3 have been found in lymphocytes. METHODS: We used high-resolution enzymatic amplification staining technology in conjunction with flow cytometry and confocal microscopy and with immunoblotting to reassess the expression of the D cyclins in human lymphocytes. RESULTS: Using high-resolution technology for flow cytometry, we found all three D cyclins in quiescent human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Cyclin D1 was expressed in quiescent and activated cells at levels commensurate with those of actively proliferating tumor cell lines. Cyclin D1 was functional inasmuch as it was complexed with CDK4. In the quiescent cells, cyclin D1 was expressed in the cytoplasm but, after activation, was found in the nucleus. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that lymphocytes express cyclin D1 and necessitate a reappraisal of the hypothesis that the D cyclins subsume redundant activities with tissue-specific expression.     

Induction of string rescues the neuroblast proliferation defect in trol mutant animals

In trol mutants, neuroblasts fail to exit G1 for S phase. Increasing string expression in trol mutants rescues the number of S phase neuroblasts without an increase in M phase neuroblasts. Decreasing string expression further decreased the number of S phase neuroblasts. Coexpression of cyclin E and string did not produce additional S phase cells. Unlike cyclin E, cdk2, and cdk2AF, elevated expression of neither cyclin A, cyclin D, nor cdk1AF was able to promote S phase progression in arrested neuroblasts, indicating that String-induced activity of a Cyclin A or Cyclin D complex is unlikely to drive trol neuroblasts into S phase. Biochemical analyses revealed a rapid increase of Cyclin E-Cdk2 kinase activity to wild-type levels upon increased string expression. These results suggest that Drosophila Cdc25 may directly or indirectly increase the kinase activity of Cyclin E-Cdk2 complexes in vivo, thus driving arrested neuroblasts into cell division.     

Cyclin D3 is dispensable for human diffuse large B-cell lymphoma survival and growth: evidence for redundancy with cyclin E

Genomic changes disrupting the expression of cyclin D3 are associated with aberrant growth of several human B-lymphoid malignancies. We demonstrate that the human diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), OCI-LY18 (LY18) expresses cyclin D3 but not cyclins D1 and D2. RNA interference was used to deplete cyclin D3 from LY18 cells. Surprisingly, knockdown of cyclin D3 did not inhibit pRb phosphorylation on cdk4/6- and cdk2-specific residues or measurably affect viability and proliferation. These results suggest that cyclin D3 is dispensable in LY18 cell proliferation and survival. Similar results were obtained following depletion of cyclin E. By contrast, combined knockdown of cyclins D3 and E had substantial consequences leading to G1-phase arrest and inhibition of proliferation. Whereas cell cycle distribution was not affected following individual depletion of cdk4, cdk6, or cdk2, the combined knockdown of cdk4 and cdk6 led to accumulation of LY18 cells in G1-phase of the cell cycle and inhibition of proliferation. Likewise treatment of LY18 cells with 2-Bromo-12,13-dihydro-5H-indolo[2,3-a]pyrrolo[3,4-c]carbazole-5,7(6H)-dione, a selective inhibitor of cdk4/6, led to inhibition of proliferation. Taken together, these results uncover a built-in redundancy with cyclins D3 and E for G1-S progression. Moreover these findings highlight the rationale for simultaneous disruption of cdk4/6 as a potential therapeutic cancer strategy.     

Cyclin D1 is dispensable for G1 control in retinoblastoma gene-deficient cells independently of cdk4 activity.

To elucidate the regulator-versus-target relationship in the cyclin D1/cdk4/retinoblastoma protein (pRB) pathway, we examined fibroblasts from RB-1 gene-deficient and RB-1 wild-type littermate mouse embryos (ME) and in human tumor cell lines that differed in the status of the RB-1 gene. The RB+/+ and RB-/- ME fibroblasts expressed similar protein levels of D-type cyclins, cdk4, and cdk6, showed analogous spectra and abundance of cellular proteins complexed with cdk4 and/or cyclins D1 and D2, and exhibited comparable associated kinase activities. Of the two human cell lines established from the same sarcoma biopsy, the RB-positive SKUT1B cells contained cdk4 that was mainly associated with D-type cyclins, contrary to a predominant cdk4-p16INK4 complex in the RB-deficient SKUT1A cells. Antibody-mediated neutralization of cyclin D1 arrested the RB-positive ME and SKUT1B cells in G1, whereas this cyclin appeared dispensable in the RB-deficient ME and SKUT1A cells. Lack of requirement for cyclin D1 therefore correlated with absence of functional pRB, regardless of whether active cyclin D1/cdk4 holoenzyme was present in the cells under study. Consistent with a potential role of cyclin D/cdk4 in phosphorylation of pRB, monoclonal anti-cyclin D1 antibodies supporting the associated kinase activity failed to significantly affect proliferation of RB-positive cells, whereas the antibody DCS-6, unable to coprecipitate cdk4, efficiently inhibited G1 progression and prevented pRB phosphorylation in vivo. These data provide evidence for an upstream control function of cyclin D1/cdk4, and a downstream role for pRB, in the order of events regulating transition through late G1 phase of the mammalian cell division cycle.     

Threshold expression of cyclin E but not D type cyclins characterizes normal and tumour cells entering S phase

Complexes of cyclin-dependent kinases (cdk) and their partner cyclins drive the cell through the cell cycle, each such complex phosphorylating a distinct set of proteins at a particular check-point or phase of the cycle. Immunocytochemical detection of cyclins combined with measurement of cellular DNA content by flow cytometry makes it possible to relate expression of each of these proteins with the actual cell cycle position, without the necessity of cell synchronization. In the present study, we have investigated expression of E and D type cyclins in G₁ cells and in cells entering S phase, in eight different human hematopoietic and solid tumour cell lines (two leukaemias, a lymphoma, three breast carcinomas, a colon carcinoma and a bladder transitional cell carcinoma) during their exponential phase of growth, as well as in normal mitogen stimulated lymphocytes. In all the cell types studied, the average level of D type cyclin expression was invariable throughout the cell cycle. A great intercellular variability, in particular of the G₁ cell subpopulations, and the presence of a large fraction of G₁, S and G₂+ M cells that were cyclin D negative (20–40% in tumour cell lines and about 80% among lymphocytes), were other characteristic features of D type cyclin expression. In contrast to D type cyclins, the expression of cyclin E was discontinuous during the cycle, peaking at the time of cell entrance to S. Also, a well defined threshold in expression of cyclin E characterized cells that were entering S phase, and virtually no cyclin E negative cells were seen during the early portion of S phase. The data indicate that while cell entrance to S phase is unrelated to expression of D type cyclins (at the time of entrance), accumulation of cyclin E up to critical level is a prerequisite for initiation of DNA replication. The great intercellular variability in expression of D type cyclins and their invariant average level across the cell cycle suggest that these cyclins, in addition to their acknowledged function in promoting cell progression through mid- to late-G₁ may have other role(s), related or unrelated to the cell cycle progression. The presence of a large number of D type cyclin negative cells in all phases of the cycle suggests that during exponential growth the cells may not express this protein and yet may traverse the cycle, including G₁ phase.     

Estrogen-dependent cyclin E-cdk2 activation through p21 redistribution.

In order to elucidate the mechanisms by which estrogens and antiestrogens modulate the growth of breast cancer cells, we have characterized the changes induced by estradiol that occur during the G1 phase of the cell cycle of MCF-7 human mammary carcinoma cells. Addition of estradiol relieves the cell cycle block created by tamoxifen treatment, leading to marked activation of cyclin E-cdk2 complexes and phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein within 6 h. Cyclin D1 levels increase significantly while the levels of cyclin E, cdk2, and the p21 and p27 cdk inhibitors are relatively constant. However, the p21 cdk inhibitor shifts from its association with cyclin E-cdk2 to cyclin D1-cdk4, providing an explanation for the observed activation of the cyclin E-cdk2 complexes. These results support the notion that cyclin D1 has an important role in steroid-dependent cell proliferation and that estrogen, by regulating the activities of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases, can control the proliferation of breast cancer cells.     

Cdk2 plays a critical role in hepatocyte cell cycle progression and survival in the setting of cyclin D1 expression in vivo

Cdk2 was once believed to play an essential role in cell cycle progression, but cdk2-/- mice have minimal phenotypic abnormalities. In this study, we examined the role of cdk2 in hepatocyte proliferation, centrosome duplication, and survival. Cdk2-/- hepatocytes underwent mitosis and had normal centrosome content after mitogen stimulation. Unlike wild-type cells, cdk2-/- liver cells failed to undergo centrosome overduplication in response to ectopic cyclin D1 expression. After mitogen stimulation in culture or partial hepatectomy in vivo, cdk2-/- hepatocytes demonstrated diminished proliferation. Cyclin D1 is a key mediator of cell cycle progression in hepatocytes, and transient expression of this protein is sufficient to promote robust proliferation of these cells in vivo. In cdk2-/- mice and animals treated with the cdk2 inhibitor seliciclib, cyclin D1 failed to induce hepatocyte cell cycle progression. Surprisingly, cdk2 ablation or inhibition led to massive hepatocyte and animal death following cyclin D1 transfection. In a transgenic model of chronic hepatic cyclin D1 expression, seliciclib induced hepatocyte injury and animal death, suggesting that cdk2 is required for survival of cyclin D1-expressing cells even in the absence of substantial proliferation. In conclusion, our studies demonstrate that cdk2 plays a role in liver regeneration. Furthermore, it is essential for centrosome overduplication, proliferation, and survival of hepatocytes that aberrantly express cyclin D1 in vivo. These studies suggest that cdk2 may warrant further investigation as a target for therapy of liver tumors with constitutive cyclin D1 expression.