Treatment of ischial pressure ulcers with a posteromedial thigh fasciocutaneous flap.

This study describes the use of the posteromedial thigh fasciocutaneous flap for the treatment of ischial pressure sores. The authors prefer this flap because it is the fasciocutaneous flap nearest to the ischial region, it is easy to raise, and it causes no donor-site morbidity. In this study, 11 ischial pressure sores in 10 paraplegic patients were closed using the posteromedial thigh fasciocutaneous flaps. All flaps survived, although two caused distal necrosis; after these same two flaps were readvanced, they survived. After an average follow-up time of 77 months, seven of the 10 patients have had no recurrence of ulcers.This fasciocutaneous flap was previously described by Wang et al. However, this study revealed that the arrangement of the vascular pedicle was different from that described by Wang et al. To reveal the vascular supply of this flap, anatomic dissections were conducted. The source of circulation to this flap was the suprafascial vascular plexus, in addition to the musculocutaneous perforator. The dominant pedicle was the musculocutaneous perforator from either the adductor magnus muscle or the gracilis muscle. The key to safe elevation of this flap was the accurate outlining of the skin island directly over the vascular pedicle and the preservation of the proximal fascial continuity. Of the 11 flaps, two viability problems occurred. These partial flap losses resulted from the failure to properly include the perforator. It is the authors' conclusion that the width of the flap should be greater than 5 cm. In addition, it is safe to make a flap within a 1:3 base-to-length ratio in a fatty, diabetic patient. This posteromedial thigh fasciocutaneous flap was found to be a valuable alternative for reconstruction of primary or recurrent ischial pressure ulcers.     

A clinical experience with perforator flaps in the coverage of extensive defects of the upper extremity

Traditional skin free flaps, such as radial arm, lateral arm, and scapular flaps, are rarely sufficient to cover large skin defects of the upper extremity because of the limitation of primary closure at the donor site. Muscle or musculocutaneous flaps have been used more for these defects. However, they preclude a sacrifice of a large amount of muscle tissue with the subsequent donor-site morbidity. Perforator or combined flaps are better alternatives to cover large defects. The use of a muscle as part of a combined flap is limited to very specific indications, and the amount of muscle required is restricted to the minimum to decrease the donor-site morbidity. The authors present a series of 12 patients with extensive defects of the upper extremity who were treated between December of 1999 and March of 2002. The mean defect was 21 x 11 cm in size. Perforator flaps (five thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps and four deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps) were used in seven patients. Combined flaps, which were a combination of two different types of tissue based on a single pedicle, were needed in five patients (scapular skin flap with a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in one patient and a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap with a split latissimus dorsi muscle in four patients). In one case, immediate surgical defatting of a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap on a wrist was performed to immediately achieve thin coverage. The average operative time was 5 hours 20 minutes (range, 3 to 7 hours). All but one flap, in which the cutaneous part of a combined flap necrosed because of a postoperative hematoma, survived completely. Adequate coverage and complete wound healing were obtained in all cases. Perforator flaps can be used successfully to cover a large defect in an extremity with minimal donor-site morbidity. Combined flaps provide a large amount of tissue, a wide range of mobility, and easy shaping, modeling, and defatting.     

Bilateral autogenous breast reconstruction using perforator free flaps: a single center's experience

The authors present a single center's experience in bilateral breast reconstruction using perforator free flaps. The aim of this study was to show their indications, surgical technique, and results. A series of 53 patients underwent this procedure between February of 1996 and October of 2002. The surgical procedures were performed on patients with bilateral breast cancer (11 patients), patients with unilateral breast cancer and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (22 patients), patients who had undergone bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (18 patients), a patient with Poland's syndrome, and a patient whose aesthetic breast augmentation had failed. Primary and secondary bilateral breast reconstructions were done in 18 and four patients, respectively. Eighteen patients who had earlier undergone breast reconstruction with implants had a tertiary breast reconstruction. Combined reconstruction (primary with secondary and primary with tertiary reconstruction) was done in 13 patients. Ninety-eight deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps and eight superior gluteal artery perforator flaps were used. The average operative time was 10 hours (range, 8 to 14.5 hours) for the simultaneous bilateral reconstruction. Total flap necrosis occurred in two cases (one deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and one superior gluteal artery perforator flap). Partial flap necrosis was not encountered, and fat necrosis was found in one deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (1 percent). Two pulmonary infections, one deep vein thrombosis, and one cardiac arrhythmia occurred as postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was 9 days (range, 6 to 20 days). Abdominal bulging was reported in one patient. There were no recurrent disease or cancer manifestations, with an average follow-up of 3.5 years. This series clearly shows that perforator flaps are reliable and useful tools for bilateral breast reconstruction. This technique decreases the donor-site morbidity and offers an excellent aesthetic and long-term outcome and high patient satisfaction.     

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction

This study examined 758 deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction, with respect to risk factors and associated complications. Risk factors that demonstrated significant association with any breast or abdominal complication included smoking (p = 0.0000), postreconstruction radiotherapy (p = 0.0000), and hypertension (p = 0.0370). Ninety-eight flaps (12.9 percent) developed fat necrosis. Associated risk factors were smoking (p = 0.0226) and postreconstruction radiotherapy (p = 0.0000). Interestingly, as the number of perforators increased, so did the incidence of fat necrosis. There were only 19 cases (2.5 percent) of partial flap loss and four cases (0.5 percent) of total flap loss. Patients with 45 flaps (5.9 percent) were returned to the operating room before the second-stage procedure. Patients with 29 flaps (3.8 percent) were returned to the operating room because of venous congestion. Venous congestion and any complication were observed to be statistically unrelated to the number of venous anastomoses. Overall, postoperative abdominal hernia or bulge occurred after only five reconstructions (0.7 percent). Complication rates in this large series were comparable to those in retrospective reviews of pedicle and free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. Previous studies of the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap described breast complication rates ranging from 8 to 13 percent and abdominal complication rates ranging from 0 to 82 percent. It was noted that, with experience in microsurgical techniques and perforator selection, the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap offers distinct advantages to patients, in terms of decreased donor-site morbidity and shorter recovery periods. Mastery of this flap provides reconstructive surgeons with more extensive options for the treatment of postmastectomy patients.     

The inferior gluteal free flap in breast reconstruction

The inferior gluteal musculocutaneous free flap usually provides a sufficient amount of autogenous tissue for breast reconstruction when adequate tissue is not present in the lower abdomen or back. Its arteriovenous pedicle is longer than the superior gluteal musculocutaneous free-flap pedicle and permits microvascular anastomosis in the axilla, avoiding medial rib and cartilage resection. In the thin patient, there is more available donor tissue than with the superior gluteal musculocutaneous free flap. Cadaver dissections confirm the greater pedicle length and the local area of the lower gluteus maximus muscle needed to carry the skin island and have helped define a safe approach to flap elevation. We have used four flaps for breast reconstruction without vascular compromise or the need for reexploration. The low donor-site scar in the inferior buttock fold has been acceptable, especially for a bilateral reconstruction. The anatomy of the gluteal region, the surgical technique for the inferior gluteal free-flap transfer, and a 3-year patient follow-up are presented.     

The gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation-advancement flap with V-Y closure in the management of sacral pressure sores

The sacral region is one of the most frequent sites of pressure sore development, and local flaps in the gluteal region are usually preferred when surgical closure is needed. The authors used the gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation-advancement flap with V-Y closure to manage sacral pressure sores in 15 patients. The design was a combination of the classic rotation and V-Y advancement flap patterns. When the wound was closed, the tension at the distal end of the rotation flap was relieved by flap advancement and the combined rotation-advancement action was supported laterally with V-Y closure. A wide skin pedicle was preserved at the inferomedial part of the flap. This pedicle augmented the blood supply to the flap skin and kept the surgical incision small, thus helping to reduce the risk of fecal contamination and associated wound-healing problems. This flap can also be converted to any design of fasciocutaneous or musculocutaneous V-Y advancement flap, should such a change be required. The largest defects that were closed with a unilateral rotation-advancement flap and bilateral rotation-advancement flaps were 12 and 18 cm in diameter, respectively. In 1.5 to 35 months of follow-up, none of the patients developed wound dehiscence or flap necrosis requiring repeated surgery. This technique is simple, can be performed quickly, has minimal associated morbidity, and yields a good outcome.     

The value of preoperative Doppler sonography for planning free perforator flaps

The individual perforating vessels have a high degree of anatomical variation, therefore it is desirable to conduct a careful examination of them before undertaking a perforator flap operation. Because locating the vessels beforehand makes performing the operative procedure much easier, the aim of the present study was to assess the value of using simple acoustic Doppler sonography to plan a perforator flap operation. The vessel examinations were carried out before taking 46 free microvascular flaps from either the lower abdominal wall or the buttock for reconstructive breast surgery. The perforating vessels located were marked, and their position relative to the umbilicus or the most cranial point of the rima ani recorded using a coordinate system. In 40 patients, a perforator flap operation (deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, n = 32; superior gluteal artery perforator flap, n = 8) was actually carried out; in six of these patients, a myocutaneous flap was used because of the insufficient availability of perforating vessels. Before the operation, perforating vessels were marked for each patient, with an average of 7.3 for the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and 6.5 for the superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Out of 286 vessels marked for later perforator flaps, 162 were identified during the operation. A preoperatively marked vessel was used in 37 of 40 patients. In the remaining patients, a vessel was used that had not been previously marked. The vertical and horizontal distance between the perforating vessels identified during the operation and the preoperative marks averaged 0.8 cm. The results show preoperative Doppler sonography to be useful for locating the position of individual perforating vessels, making it much easier to find them during the operation.     

Lower extremity muscle perforator flaps for lower extremity reconstruction

A true muscle perforator flap is distinguished by the requisite intramuscular dissection of its musculocutaneous perforator to capture the same musculocutaneous territory but with total exclusion of the muscle, and thereby results in minimal functional impairment. Adhering to this definition, several lower extremity donor sites now are available, each with specific attributes especially useful for consideration in the treatment of lower extremity defects. In this author's experience over the past two decades, 20 lower extremity muscle perforator flaps using multiple donor sites proved advantageous for lower extremity coverage problems as either a local pedicled flap or as a microsurgical tissue transfer. Significant complications occurred in 30 percent of flaps (six of 20) in that further intervention was required. Venous insufficiency and bulkiness were found to be the major inherent shortcomings. However, giant flaps, lengthy and large-caliber vascular pedicles, and the possibility for combined flaps were important assets. The choice of a lower extremity muscle perforator flap for lower extremity reconstruction limited the surgical intervention and morbidity to a single body region.     

Two options for perforator flaps in the flank donor site: latissimus dorsi and thoracodorsal perforator flaps

Two types of perforators, septocutaneous and musculocutaneous, are found in the same donor site of the flank area, and two perforator flaps based on each perforator are clinically available. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish them from one another using different nomenclatures. Accordingly, the perforator flap based on a musculocutaneous perforator is named according to the name of the muscle perforated, the latissimus dorsi perforator flap, and the perforator flap based on a septocutaneous perforator, located between the serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi muscles, is named according to the name of the proximal vessel, the thoracodorsal perforator flap. In this series of 42 latissimus dorsi perforator flaps, flap size ranged from 5 x 3 cm to 20 x 15 cm, and two complications were observed: a marginal necrosis in an extremely large flap (26 x 12 cm) and a failure caused by infection. The thoracodorsal perforator flap was used in 14 cases, including two cases of chimeric composition. Flap size ranged from 4.5 x 3.5 to 18 x 15 cm, with no complications. In the two patterns of perforator flap that the author used, initial temporary flap congestion was observed in five latissimus dorsi perforator flap cases and two thoracodorsal perforator flap cases, when the flap was designed as a large flap or a less reliable perforator was selected. However, the congestion was not serious enough to cause flap necrosis. Several techniques, such as T anastomosis or inclusion of an additional perforator or a small portion of muscle, are recommended to prevent the initial flap congestion, especially when an unreliable perforator is inevitably used or when a flap larger than 20 cm long is required. A small portion of the muscle was included in six cases, when an unduly large or improperly long flap was planned. All of the flaps were successful and ranged from 22 x 7 to 15 x 28 cm, except for one case of distal flap necrosis in an extraordinarily large flap measuring 34 x 10 cm. Diverse selection of the perforator flap is one of the great advantages of the flank donor site, providing it with wider availability and more versatile composition for reconstruction or resurfacing.     

Anterolateral thigh flap in the treatment of postburn flexion contractures of the knee

The use of the anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap in the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects around the knee among burn patients is described. The anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap was used for eight patients (all male; mean age, 45 years; age range, 32 to 60 years). Flexion contracture was observed for seven patients with unhealed wounds and one patient with a healed burn wound. The anterolateral thigh flap was used as a free flap for six patients and as a distally based island flap for two patients. The flaps ranged from 8 to 17 cm in width and from 12 to 30 cm in length. Seven flaps were based on a musculocutaneous perforator, and two of them were thinned before transfer to the defect. A true septocutaneous perforator was observed in only one case. The mean follow-up period was 12.5 months (range, 3 to 23 months). Only one flap exhibited distal superficial necrosis, which did not compromise the final result. All patients returned to ambulatory status in 15 to 22 days. Extensor splints were applied to prevent mobilization of the skin graft at the flap donor site for only 7 days. The anterolateral thigh flap has many advantages for the reconstruction of postburn flexion contracture of the knee, as follows: (1) very large thin flaps can be elevated, (2) the two-team approach is possible, (3) color and texture matches are good, (4) the donor-site scar can be easily hidden, and (5) the technique allows early mobilization and patients can return to normal daily activity in a short time. Free or distally based anterolateral thigh flaps are a good choice, both aesthetically and functionally, for the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of the knee region.     

Free-style free flaps

Free-tissue transfer has become the accepted standard for reconstruction of complex defects. With the growth of this field, anatomic studies and clinical work have added many flaps to the armamentarium of the microvascular surgeon. Further advancements and experience with techniques of perforator flap surgery have allowed for the harvest of flaps in a free-style manner, where a flap is harvested based only on the preoperative knowledge of Doppler signals present in a specific region. Between June of 2002 and September of 2003, 13 free-style free flaps were harvested from the region of the thigh. All patients presented with an oral or pharyngeal cancer and underwent resection and immediate reconstruction of these flaps. All flaps were cutaneous and were harvested in a suprafascial plane. The average size of the flaps was 108 cm2 (range, 36 to 187 cm2), and the average length of the vascular pedicle was 10 cm (range, 9 to 12 cm). All flaps were successful in achieving wound coverage and functional outcomes without any vascular compromise necessitating re-exploration. Free-style free flaps have become a clinical reality. The concepts and techniques used to harvest a free-style free flap will aid in dealing with anatomic variations that are encountered during conventional flap harvest. Future trends in flap selection will focus mainly on choosing tissue with appropriate texture, thickness, and pliability to match requirements at the recipient site while minimizing donor-site morbidity.     

Clinical applications of free soleus and peroneal perforator flaps

Clinical applications of two free lateral leg perforator flaps are described: a free soleus perforator flap that is based on the musculocutaneous perforator vessels from one of the three main arteries in the proximal lateral lower leg, and a free peroneal perforator flap that is based on the septocutaneous or direct skin perforator vessels from the peroneal artery in the distal and middle thirds of the lateral lower leg. The authors applied free soleus perforator flaps to 18 patients and free peroneal perforator flaps to five patients with soft-tissue defects. The recipient site was the great toe in 14 patients, the hand and fingers in five patients, the leg in two patients, and the upper arm and the jaw in one patient each. The largest soleus perforator flap was 15 x 9 cm, and the largest peroneal perforator flap was 9 x 4 cm. Vascular pedicle lengths ranged from 6.5 to 10 cm in soleus perforator flaps and from 4 to 6 cm in peroneal perforator flaps. All flaps, except for the flap in one patient in the peroneal perforator flap series, survived completely. Advantages of these flaps are that there is no need to sacrifice any main artery in the lower leg, and there is minimal morbidity at the donor site. For patients with a small to medium soft-tissue defect, these free perforator flaps are useful.     

Flow-through anterior thigh flaps with a short pedicle for reconstruction of lower leg and foot defects

New flow-through perforator flaps with a large, short vascular pedicle are proposed because of their clinical significance and a high success rate for reconstruction of the lower legs. Of 13 consecutive cases, the authors describe two cases of successful transfer of a new short-pedicle anterolateral or anteromedial thigh flow-through flap for coverage of soft-tissue defects in the legs. This new flap has a thin fatty layer and a small fascial component, and is vascularized with a perforator originating from a short segment of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral system. The advantages of this flap are as follows: flow-through anastomosis ensures a high success rate for free flaps and preserves the recipient arterial flow; there is no need for dissecting throughout the lateral circumflex femoral system as the pedicle vessel; minimal time is required for flap elevation; there is minimal donor-site morbidity; and the flap is obtained from a thin portion of the thigh. Even in obese patients, thinning of the flap with primary defatting is possible, and the donor scar is concealed. This flap is suitable for coverage of defects in legs where a single arterial flow remains. It is also suitable for chronic lower leg ulcers, osteomyelitis, and plantar coverage.     

Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap for reconstruction of limb defects

The superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap differs from the established groin flap in that it is nourished by only a perforator of the superficial circumflex iliac system and has a short segment (3 to 4 cm in length) of this vascular system. Three cases in which free superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flaps were successfully transferred for coverage of soft-tissue defects in the limb are described in this article. The advantages of this flap are as follows: no need for deeper and longer dissection for the pedicle vessel, a shorter flap elevation time, possible thinning of the flap with primary defatting, the possibility of an adiposal flap with customized thickness for tissue augmentation, a concealed donor site, minimal donor-site morbidity, and the availability of a large cutaneous vein as a venous drainage system. The disadvantages are the need for dissection for a smaller perforator and an anastomosing technique for small-caliber vessels of less than 1.0 mm.     

Free medial plantar perforator flaps for the resurfacing of finger and foot defects

In this article, three cases in which free medial plantar perforator flaps were successfully transferred for coverage of soft-tissue defects in the fingers and foot are described. This perforator flap has no fascial component and is nourished only by perforators of the medial plantar vessel and a cutaneous vein or with a small segment of the medial plantar vessel. The advantages of this flap are minimal donor-site morbidity, minimal damage to both the posterior tibial and medial plantar systems, no need for deep dissection, the ability to thin the flap by primary removal of excess fatty tissue, the use of a large cutaneous vein as a venous drainage system, a good color and texture match for finger pulp repair, short time for flap elevation, possible application as a flow-through flap, and a concealed donor scar.     

Anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous island flaps in perineoscrotal reconstruction

This study presents the authors' experience using the anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap for complex perineal and scrotal reconstruction. Anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous island flaps were performed in seven patients between January and June of 2000 (six male, one female; mean age, 52 years; age range, 9 to 72 years). Four of the seven patients had scrotal or perineal defects after multiple debridements for Fournier's gangrene. Two of these four had exposed testicles. Three flaps were used for recurrent ischial ulcers. A true septocutaneous perforator (type 1) running between the rectus femoris and the vastus lateralis muscles was found in only two patients. In four patients, the cutaneous perforators were found to be intramuscular, originating from the descending branch (type 2). In the other patient, the musculocutaneous perforator originated from the lateral circumflex femoris artery independently (type 3). In these cases, intramuscular dissections were performed to follow each perforator to its main trunk. Mean follow-up was 8 months (range, 5 to 10 months), and all flaps survived. Three patients developed minor wound dehiscence in the posterior aspect of the perineal wound because of fecal contamination and skin maceration. Both wounds healed secondarily. Scrotal reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap gave an excellent aesthetic result. The authors conclude that the anterolateral thigh flap is a reliable flap for perineoscrotal reconstruction.     

The dorsalis pedis myofascial flap

A modification of the dorsalis pedis artery island flap is presented. In this modification, the deep fascia of the dorsum of the foot with part or the whole of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle is used as a fascial or myofascial flap supplied by the dorsalis pedis artery and covered by a split-thickness skin graft. The purpose is to decrease the morbidity of the donor site, which is closed by direct sutures without skin grafting. Four cases are reported with minimal donor-site morbidity and full survival of the flaps. The mean follow-up period is 17 months.     

Modified free paraumbilical perforator flap: the next logical step in breast reconstruction

The free paraumbilical perforator flap that was developed with only the perforator penetrating the rectus abdominis muscle seems nearly ideal from the donor-site perspective, because it reduces morbidity virtually to that of an abdominoplasty. However, it requires "supermicrosurgery" skills for suturing of vessels with diameters of 0.7 mm or less, making the procedure technically demanding and risky. Another significant disadvantage of that technique is that the flap has very short vascular pedicles. To overcome the disadvantages of the free paraumbilical perforator flap, a minor modification in flap harvesting that improves the vessel size and length is described. Results for a total of 15 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with modified free paraumbilical perforator flaps are presented, and the advantages and disadvantages of this flap are discussed.     

Free tensor fasciae latae perforator flap for the reconstruction of defects in the extremities

In the three cases presented in this study, free tensor fasciae latae perforator flaps were used successfully for the coverage of defects in the extremities. This flap has no muscle component and is nourished by muscle perforators of the transverse branch of the lateral circumflex femoral system. The area of skin that can by nourished by these perforators is larger than 15 x 12 cm. The advantages of this flap include minimal donor-site morbidity, the preservation of motor function of the tensor fasciae latae muscle and fascia lata, the ability to thin the flap by removing excess fatty tissue, and a donor scar that can be concealed. In cases that involve transection of the perforator above the deep fascia, the operation can be completed in a very short period of time. This flap is especially suitable as a free flap for young women and children who have scars in the proximal region of the lateral thigh or groin region that were caused by split-thickness skin grafting or full-thickness skin grafting during previous operations.