Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor induces conformational changes in the integrin alphaMbeta2 headpiece and reorientation of its transmembrane domains

The glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) interacts with the heterodimer cell adhesion molecules integrins to modulate cell adhesion and migration. Devoid of a cytoplasmic domain, uPAR triggers intracellular signaling via its associated molecules that contain cytoplasmic domains. Interestingly, uPAR changes the ectodomain conformation of one of its partner molecules, integrin alpha(5)beta(1), and elicits cytoplasmic signaling. The separation or reorientation of integrin transmembrane domains and cytoplasmic tails are required for integrin outside-in signaling. However, there is a lack of direct evidence showing these conformational changes of an integrin that interacts with uPAR. In this investigation we used reporter monoclonal antibodies and fluorescence resonance energy transfer analyses to show conformational changes in the alpha(M)beta(2) headpiece and reorientation of its transmembrane domains when alpha(M)beta(2) interacts with uPAR.     

Integrin bi‐directional signaling across the plasma membrane

Integrins are heterodimeric cell adhesion molecules that are important in many biological functions, such as cell migration, proliferation, differentiation, and survival. They can transmit bi‐directional signals across the plasma membrane. Inside‐out activating signal from some cell surface receptors bound with soluble agonists triggers integrins conformational change leading to high affinity for extracellular ligands. Then binding of ligands to integrins results in outside‐in signaling, leading to formation of focal adhesion complex at the integrin cytoplasmic tail and activation of downstream signal pathways. This bi‐directional signaling is essential for rapid response of cell to surrounding environmental changes. During this process, the conformational change of integrin extracellular and transmembrane/cytoplasmic domains is particularly important. In this review, we will summarize recent progress in both inside‐out and outside‐in signaling with specific focus on the mechanism how integrins transmit bi‐directional signals through transmembrane/cytoplasmic domains. J. Cell. Physiol. 228: 306–312, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Integrin structures and conformational signaling

Integrins are cell adhesion molecules that play critical roles in development, wound healing, hemostasis, immunity and cancer. Advances in the past two years have shed light on the structural basis for integrin regulation and signaling, especially on how global conformational changes between bent and extended conformations relate to the inter-domain and intra-domain shape shifting that regulates affinity for ligand. The downward movements of the C-terminal helices of the alpha I and beta I domains and the swing-out of the hybrid domain play pivotal roles in integrin conformational signaling. Experiments have also shown that integrins transmit bidirectional signals across the plasma membrane by coupling extracellular conformational change with an unclasping and separation of the alpha and beta transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains.     

Structures of integrin domains and concerted conformational changes in the bidirectional signaling mechanism of alphaIIbbeta3

Integrins are heterodimeric type I transmembrane cell-adhesive receptors whose affinity for ligands is regulated by tertiary and quaternary conformational changes that are transmitted from the cytoplasmic tails to the extracellular ectodomains during the transition from the inactive to the active state. Receptor occupancy initiates further structural alterations that transduce signals across the plasma membrane and result in receptor clustering and recruitment of signaling molecules and cytoskeletal rearrangements at the integrin's cytoplasmic domains. The large distance between the intracellular cytoplasmic domains and the ligand-binding site, which in an extended conformation spans more that 200 A, imposes a complex mechanism of interdomain communication for the bidirectional information flow across the plasma membrane. Significant progress has recently been made in elucidating the crystal and electron microscopy structures of integrin ectodomains in its unliganded and liganded states, and the nuclear magnetic resonance solution structures of stalk domains and the cytoplasmic tails. These structures revealed the location of sites that are functionally important and provided the basis for defining new models of integrin activation and signaling through bidirectional conformational changes, and for understanding the structural basis of the cation-dependent ligand-binding specificity of integrins. Platelet integrin alphaIIbbeta3 has served as a paradigm for many aspects of the structure and function of integrins The aim of this minireview is to combine recent structural and biochemical studies on integrin receptors that converge into a model of the tertiary and quaternary conformational changes in alphaIIbbeta3 and other homologous integrins that propagate inside-out and outside-in signals.     

Dissociation of the α-subunit Calf-2 domain and the β-subunit I-EGF4 domain in integrin activation and signaling

Integrin conformational changes mediate integrin activation and signaling triggered by intracellular molecules or extracellular ligands. Even though it is known that αβ transmembrane domain separation is required for integrin signaling, it is still not clear how this signal is transmitted from the transmembrane domain through two long extracellular legs to the ligand-binding headpiece. This study addresses whether the separation of the membrane-proximal extracellular αβ legs is critical for integrin activation and outside-in signaling. Using a disulfide bond to restrict dissociation of the α-subunit Calf-2 domain and β-subunit I-EGF4 domain, we were able to abolish integrin inside-out activation and outside-in signaling. In contrast, disrupting the interface by introducing a glycosylation site into either subunit activated integrins for ligand binding through a global conformational change. Our results suggest that the interface of the Calf-2 domain and the I-EGF4 domain is critical for integrin bidirectional signaling.     

Intact alphaIIbbeta3 integrin is extended after activation as measured by solution X-ray scattering and electron microscopy

Integrins are bidirectional signaling molecules on the cell surface that have fundamental roles in regulating cell behavior and contribute to cell migration and adhesion. Understanding of the mechanism of integrin signaling and activation has been advanced with truncated ectodomain preparations; however, the nature of conformational change in the full-length intact integrin molecule remains an active area of research. Here we used small angle x-ray scattering and electron microscopy to study detergent-solubilized, intact platelet integrin α(IIb)β(3). In the resting state, the intact α(IIb)β(3) adopted a compact, bent conformation. Upon activation with Mn(2+), the average integrin extension increased. Further activation by addition of ligand led to stabilization of the extended state and opening of the headpiece. The observed extension and conformational rearrangement upon activation are consistent with the extension and headpiece opening model of integrin activation.     

Effects of the association between the α-subunit thigh and the β-Subunit EGF2 domains on integrin activation and signaling

Integrin bidirectional signaling is mediated by conformational change. It has been shown that the separation of the α- and β-subunit transmembrane/cytoplasmic tails and the lower legs is required for transmitting integrin bidirectional signals across the plasma membrane. In this study, we address whether the separation of the αβ knee is critical for integrin activation and outside-in signaling. By introducing three disulfide bonds to restrict dissociation of the α-subunit thigh domain and β-subunit I-EGF2 domain, we found that two of them could completely abolish integrin inside-out activation, whereas the other could not. This disulfide-bonded mutant, in the context of the activation mutation of the cytoplasmic domain, had intermediate affinity for ligands and was able to mediate cell adhesion. Our data suggest that there exists rearrangement at the interface between the thigh domain and the I-EGF2 domain during integrin inside-out activation. None of the disulfide-bonded mutants could mediate cell spreading upon adhering to immobilized ligands, suggesting that dissociation of the integrin two knees is required for integrin outside-in signaling. Disrupting the interface by introducing a glycan chain into either subunit is sufficient for high affinity ligand binding and cell spreading.     

A 50-A separation of the integrin alpha v beta 3 extracellular domain C termini reveals an intermediate activation state

The integrin alpha(v)beta(3) has been shown to exist in low and high affinity conformations. Activation to the high affinity state is thought to depend on the "switchblade-like" opening, from a low affinity bent conformation with a closed headpiece to an extended form of the integrin with an open headpiece. Activation has been shown to depend on separation of the cytoplasmic domains. How cytoplasmic domain separation is related to separation of the transmembrane domains is unknown, and the distance of separation of the transmembrane domains required for activation has not been defined. A constrained secreted form of alpha(v)beta(3) was engineered that introduced a 50-A separation of the integrin C-terminal tails of the extracellular domains of the alpha(v) and beta(3) subunits. Receptor binding and recognition by ligand-induced binding state (LIBS) monoclonal antibodies demonstrated that the mutant receptor was locked into a low affinity state that was likely in a partially extended conformation but with a closed headpiece. In the presence of RGD peptide, the constrained receptor was able to fully extend, as determined by full exposure of LIBS epitopes. In the presence of the appropriate LIBS antibody, high affinity ligand binding of the constrained receptor was achieved. The results support the existence of transient intermediate activation states of secreted alpha(v)beta(3). Furthermore, these results with the secreted alpha(v)beta(3) receptor support a model for the full-length membrane-bound form of alpha(v)beta(3), whereby a 50-A lateral separation of the integrin alpha(v) and beta(3) transmembrane domains would be sufficient to enforce the switchblade-like opening to the extended conformation but insufficient for full receptor activation.     

Integrin αIIbβ3 Transmembrane Domain Separation Mediates Bi-Directional Signaling across the Plasma Membrane

Integrins play an essential role in hemostasis, thrombosis, and cell migration, and they transmit bidirectional signals. Transmembrane/cytoplasmic domains are hypothesized to associate in the resting integrins; whereas, ligand binding and intracellular activating signals induce transmembrane domain separation. However, how this conformational change affects integrin outside-in signaling and whether the α subunit cytoplasmic domain is important for this signaling remain elusive. Using Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells that stably expressed different integrin α_IIbβ₃ constructs, we discovered that an α_IIb cytoplasmic domain truncation led to integrin activation but not defective outside-in signaling. In contrast, preventing transmembrane domain separation abolished both inside-out and outside-in signaling regardless of removing the α_IIb cytoplasmic tail. Truncation of the α_IIb cytoplasmic tail did not obviously affect adhesion-induced outside-in signaling. Our research revealed that transmembrane domain separation is a downstream conformational change after the cytoplasmic domain dissociation in inside-out activation and indispensable for ligand-induced outside-in signaling. The result implicates that the β TM helix rearrangement after dissociation is essential for integrin transmembrane signaling. Furthermore, we discovered that the PI3K/Akt pathway is not essential for cell spreading but spreading-induced Erk1/2 activation is PI3K dependent implicating requirement of the kinase for cell survival in outside-in signaling.     

Global conformational rearrangements in integrin extracellular domains in outside-in and inside-out signaling

How ligand binding alters integrin conformation in outside-in signaling, and how inside-out signals alter integrin affinity for ligand, have been mysterious. We address this with electron microscopy, physicochemical measurements, mutational introduction of disulfides, and ligand binding to alphaVbeta3 and alphaIIbbeta3 integrins. We show that a highly bent integrin conformation is physiological and has low affinity for biological ligands. Addition of a high affinity ligand mimetic peptide or Mn(2+) results in a switchblade-like opening to an extended structure. An outward swing of the hybrid domain at its junction with the I-like domain shows conformational change within the headpiece that is linked to ligand binding. Breakage of a C-terminal clasp between the alpha and beta subunits enhances Mn(2+)-induced unbending and ligand binding.     

Transmembrane domain helix packing stabilizes integrin alphaIIbbeta3 in the low affinity state

Regulated changes in the affinity of integrin adhesion receptors ("activation") play an important role in numerous biological functions including hemostasis, the immune response, and cell migration. Physiological integrin activation is the result of conformational changes in the extracellular domain initiated by the binding of cytoplasmic proteins to integrin cytoplasmic domains. The conformational changes in the extracellular domain are likely caused by disruption of intersubunit interactions between the alpha and beta transmembrane (TM) and cytoplasmic domains. Here, we reasoned that mutation of residues contributing to alpha/beta interactions that stabilize the low affinity state should lead to integrin activation. Thus, we subjected the entire intracellular domain of the beta3 integrin subunit to unbiased random mutagenesis and selected it for activated mutants. 25 unique activating mutations were identified in the TM and membrane-proximal cytoplasmic domain. In contrast, no activating mutations were identified in the more distal cytoplasmic tail, suggesting that this region is dispensable for the maintenance of the inactive state. Among the 13 novel TM domain mutations that lead to integrin activation were several informative point mutations that, in combination with computational modeling, suggested the existence of a specific TM helix-helix packing interface that maintains the low affinity state. The interactions predicted by the model were used to identify additional activating mutations in both the alpha and beta TM domains. Therefore, we propose that helical packing of the alpha and beta TM domains forms a clasp that regulates integrin activation.     

Conformational equilibria and intrinsic affinities define integrin activation

We show that the three conformational states of integrin α₅β₁ have discrete free energies and define activation by measuring intrinsic affinities for ligand of each state and the equilibria linking them. The 5,000‐fold higher affinity of the extended‐open state than the bent‐closed and extended‐closed states demonstrates profound regulation of affinity. Free energy requirements for activation are defined with protein fragments and intact α₅β₁. On the surface of K562 cells, α₅β₁ is 99.8% bent‐closed. Stabilization of the bent conformation by integrin transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains must be overcome by cellular energy input to stabilize extension. Following extension, headpiece opening is energetically favored. N‐glycans and leg domains in each subunit that connect the ligand‐binding head to the membrane repel or crowd one another and regulate conformational equilibria in favor of headpiece opening. The results suggest new principles for regulating signaling in the large class of receptors built from extracellular domains in tandem with single‐span transmembrane domains.     

Activation of platelet alphaIIbbeta3 by an exogenous peptide corresponding to the transmembrane domain of alphaIIb

A transmembrane domain heterodimer, acting in concert with a membrane-proximal cytoplasmic domain clasp, is thought to maintain integrins in a low affinity state. To test whether helix-helix interactions between the alphaIIb and beta3 transmembrane domains regulate the activity of integrin alphaIIbbeta3, we synthesized a soluble peptide corresponding to the alphaIIb transmembrane domain, designated alphaIIb-TM, and we studied its ability to affect alphaIIbbeta3 activity in human platelets. alphaIIb-TM was alpha-helical in detergent micelles and phospholipid vesicles, readily inserted into membrane bilayers, bound to intact purified alphaIIbbeta3, and specifically associated with the transmembrane domain of alphaIIb, rather than the transmembrane domains of beta3, alpha2, and beta1, other integrin subunits present in platelets. When added to suspensions of gel-filtered platelets, alphaIIb-TM rapidly induced platelet aggregation that was not inhibited by preincubating platelets with the prostaglandin E(1) or the ADP scavenger apyrase but was prevented by the divalent cation chelator EDTA. Furthermore, alphaIIb-TM induced fibrinogen binding to platelets but not the binding of osteopontin, a specific ligand for platelet alphavbeta3. The peptide also induced fibrinogen binding to recombinant alphaIIbbeta3 expressed by Chinese hamster ovary cells, confirming that its effect was independent of platelet signal transduction. Finally, transmission electron microscopy of purified alphaIIbbeta3 revealed that alphaIIb-TM shifted the integrin from a closed configuration with its stalks touching to an open configuration with separated stalks. These observations demonstrate that transmembrane domain interactions regulate integrin function in situ and that it is possible to target intra-membranous protein-protein interactions in a way that can have functional consequences.     

Cytoplasmic salt bridge formation in integrin αvß3 stabilizes its inactive state affecting integrin-mediated cell biological effects

Heterodimeric integrin receptors are mediators of cell adhesion, motility, invasion, proliferation, and survival. By this, they are crucially involved in (tumor) cell biological behavior. Integrins trigger signals bidirectionally across cell membranes: by outside-in, following binding of protein ligands of the extracellular matrix, and by inside-out, where proteins are recruited to ß-integrin cytoplasmic tails resulting in conformational changes leading to increased integrin binding affinity and integrin activation. Computational modeling and experimental/mutational approaches imply that associations of integrin transmembrane domains stabilize the low-affinity integrin state. Moreover, a cytoplasmic interchain salt bridge is discussed to contribute to a tight clasp of the α/ß-membrane-proximal regions; however, its existence and physiological relevance for integrin activation are still a controversial issue. In order to further elucidate the functional role of salt bridge formation, we designed mutants of the tumor biologically relevant integrin αvß3 by mutually exchanging the salt bridge forming amino acid residues on each chain (αv_R995D and ß3_D723R). Following transfection of human ovarian cancer cells with different combinations of wild type and mutated integrin chains, we showed that loss of salt bridge formation strengthened αvß3-mediated adhesion to vitronectin, provoked recruitment of cytoskeletal proteins, such as talin, and induced integrin signaling, ultimately resulting in enhanced cell migration, proliferation, and activation of integrin-related signaling molecules. These data support the notion of a functional relevance of integrin cytoplasmic salt bridge disruption during integrin activation.     

Transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains in integrin activation and protein-protein interactions (review)

Integrins are heterodimeric membrane-spanning adhesion receptors that are essential for a wide range of biological functions. Control of integrin conformational states is required for bidirectional signalling across the membrane. Key components of this control mechanism are the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the alpha and beta subunits. These domains are believed to interact, holding the integrin in the inactive state, while inside-out integrin activation is accompanied by domain separation. Although there are strong indications for domain interactions, the majority of evidence is insufficient to precisely define the interaction interface. The current best model of the complex, derived from computational calculations with experimental restraints, suggests that integrin activation by the cytoplasmic protein talin is accomplished by steric disruption of the alpha/beta interface. Better atomic-level resolution structures of the alpha/beta transmembrane/cytoplasmic domain complex are still required for the resting state integrin to corroborate this. Integrin activation is also controlled by competitive interactions involving the cytoplasmic domains, particularly the beta-tails. The concept of the beta integrin tail as a focal adhesion interaction 'hub' for interactions and regulation is discussed. Current efforts to define the structure and affinity of the various complexes formed by integrin tails, and how these interactions are controlled, e.g. by phosphorylation and localization, are described.     

Transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains in integrin activation and protein-protein interactions (Review)

Integrins are heterodimeric membrane-spanning adhesion receptors that are essential for a wide range of biological functions. Control of integrin conformational states is required for bidirectional signalling across the membrane. Key components of this control mechanism are the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the α and β subunits. These domains are believed to interact, holding the integrin in the inactive state, while inside-out integrin activation is accompanied by domain separation. Although there are strong indications for domain interactions, the majority of evidence is insufficient to precisely define the interaction interface. The current best model of the complex, derived from computational calculations with experimental restraints, suggests that integrin activation by the cytoplasmic protein talin is accomplished by steric disruption of the α/β interface. Better atomic-level resolution structures of the α/β transmembrane/cytoplasmic domain complex are still required for the resting state integrin to corroborate this. Integrin activation is also controlled by competitive interactions involving the cytoplasmic domains, particularly the β-tails. The concept of the β integrin tail as a focal adhesion interaction ‘hub’ for interactions and regulation is discussed. Current efforts to define the structure and affinity of the various complexes formed by integrin tails, and how these interactions are controlled, e.g. by phosphorylation and localization, are described.     

On the Activation of Integrin αIIbβ3: Outside-in and Inside-out Pathways

Integrin αIIbβ3 is a member of the integrin family of transmembrane proteins present on the plasma membrane of platelets. Integrin αIIbβ3 is widely known to regulate the process of thrombosis via activation at its cytoplasmic side by talin and interaction with the soluble fibrinogen. It is also reported that three groups of interactions restrain integrin family members in the inactive state, including a set of salt bridges on the cytoplasmic side of the transmembrane domain of the integrin α- and β-subunits known as the inner membrane clasp, hydrophobic packing of a few transmembrane residues on the extracellular side between the α- and β-subunits that is known as the outer membrane clasp, and the key interaction group of the βA domain (located on the β-subunit head domain) with the βTD (proximal to the plasma membrane on the β-subunit). However, molecular details of this key interaction group as well as events that lead to detachment of the βTD and βA domains have remained ambiguous. In this study, we use molecular dynamics models to take a comprehensive outside-in and inside-out approach at exploring how integrin αIIbβ3 is activated. First, we show that talin’s interaction with the membrane-proximal and membrane-distal regions of integrin cytoplasmic-transmembrane domains significantly loosens the inner membrane clasp. Talin also interacts with an additional salt bridge (R734-E1006), which facilitates integrin activation through the separation of the integrin’s α- and β-subunits. The second part of our study classifies three types of interactions between RGD peptides and the extracellular domains of integrin αIIbβ3. Finally, we show that the interaction of the Arg of the RGD sequence may activate integrin via disrupting the key interaction group between K350 on the βA domain and S673/S674 on the βTD.     

A naturally occurring extracellular alpha-beta clasp contributes to stabilization of beta3 integrins in a bent, resting conformation

Control of alphaIIb beta3 and alphav beta3 integrin activation is critical for cardiovascular homeostasis. Mutations that perturb association of integrin alpha and beta subunits in their transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions activate the integrin heterodimer, suggesting that a low-affinity or "off" conformation is the default state, likely corresponding to the bent conformation seen in the crystal structure of alphav beta3. In this bent structure, a segment of alphav (301-308) and beta3 (560-567) are juxtaposed. Here we provide evidence that these regions of alphav/alphaIIb and beta3 function as a novel extracellular clasp to restrain activation. Synthetic peptides representing the alphaIIb and beta3 clasp regions promote integrin activation as judged by cell adhesion, cell spreading, and exposure of epitopes for three beta3 LIBS antibodies. Mutation of the clasp region of alphav or beta3 results in a constitutively activated integrin, confirming the role of the extracellular clasp in restraining integrin activation. Molecular dynamics simulations of the alphav beta3 structure yield a refined model for the alphav beta3 clasp and provide plausible explanations for the effects of the activating mutations.     

Structural basis of integrin transmembrane activation

Integrins are cell adhesion receptors that transmit bidirectional signals across plasma membrane and are crucial for many biological functions. Recent structural studies of integrin transmembrane (TM) and cytoplasmic domains have shed light on their conformational changes during integrin activation. A structure of the resting state was solved based on Rosetta computational modeling and experimental data using intact integrins on mammalian cell surface. In this structure, the α_IIb GXXXG motif and their β₃ counterparts of the TM domains associate with ridge‐in‐groove packing, and the α_IIb GFFKR motif and the β₃ Lys‐716 in the cytoplasmic segments play a critical role in the α/β association. Comparing this structure with the NMR structures of the monomeric α_IIb and β₃ (represented as active conformations), the α subunit helix remains similar after dissociation whereas β subunit helix is tilted by embedding additional 5–6 residues into the lipid bilayer. These conformational changes are critical for integrin activation and signaling across the plasma membrane. We thus propose a new model of integrin TM activation in which the recent NMR structure of the α_IIbβ₃ TM/cytoplasmic complex represents an intermediate or transient state, and the electrostatic interaction in the cytoplasmic region is important for priming the initial α/β association, but not absolutely necessary for the resting state. J. Cell. Biochem. 109: 447–452, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A specific interface between integrin transmembrane helices and affinity for ligand

Conformational communication across the plasma membrane between the extracellular and intracellular domains of integrins is beginning to be defined by structural work on both domains. However, the role of the α and β subunit transmembrane domains and the nature of signal transmission through these domains have been elusive. Disulfide bond scanning of the exofacial portions of the integrin α_IIβ and β₃ transmembrane domains reveals a specific heterodimerization interface in the resting receptor. This interface is lost rather than rearranged upon activation of the receptor by cytoplasmic mutations of the α subunit that mimic physiologic inside-out activation, demonstrating a link between activation of the extracellular domain and lateral separation of transmembrane helices. Introduction of disulfide bridges to prevent or reverse separation abolishes the activating effect of cytoplasmic mutations, confirming transmembrane domain separation but not hinging or piston-like motions as the mechanism of transmembrane signaling by integrins.