Designing bifunctional NOP receptor–mu opioid receptor ligands from NOP-receptor selective scaffolds. Part II

The nociceptin opioid receptor (NOP) and its endogenous peptide ligand nociceptin/orphanin FQ have been shown to modulate the pharmacological effects of the classical opioid receptor system. Suppression of opioid-induced reward associated with mu-opioid receptor (MOP)-mediated analgesia, without decreasing anti-nociceptive efficacy, can potentially be achieved with NOP agonists having bifunctional agonist activity at MOP, to afford ‘non-addicting’ analgesics. In Part II of this series, we describe a continuing structure–activity relationship (SAR) study of the NOP-selective piperidin-4-yl-1,3-dihydroindol-2-one scaffold, to obtain bifunctional activity at MOP, and a suitable ratio of NOP/MOP agonist activity that produces a non-addicting analgesic profile. The SAR reported here is focused on the influence of various piperidine nitrogen aromatic substituents on the ratio of binding affinity and intrinsic activity at both the NOP and MOP receptors.     

Designing bifunctional NOP receptor–mu opioid receptor ligands from NOP receptor-selective scaffolds. Part I.

The nociceptin receptor (NOP) and its endogenous agonist, nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), members of the opioid receptor and peptide families respectively, modulate the pharmacological effects of classical opioids, particularly opioid-induced reward and nociception. We hypothesized that compounds containing both NOP and opioid receptor activity in a single molecule may have useful pharmacological profiles as non-addicting analgesics or as drug abuse medications. We report here our forays into the structure–activity relationships for discovering ‘bifunctional’ NOP–mu opioid receptor (MOP) ligands, starting from our NOP-selective scaffolds. This initial SAR suggests pharmacophoric elements that may be modified to modulate/increase opioid affinity, while maintaining high affinity for the NOP receptor, to result in potent bifunctional small-molecule NOP/MOP ligands.     

Buprenorphine‐elicited alteration of adenylate cyclase activity in human embryonic kidney 293 cells coexpressing κ‐, μ‐opioid and nociceptin receptors

Buprenorphine, a maintenance drug for heroin addicts, exerts its pharmacological function via κ‐ (KOP), μ‐opioid (MOP) and nociceptin/opioid receptor‐like 1 (NOP) receptors. Previously, we investigated its effects in an in vitro model expressing human MOP and NOP receptors individually or simultaneously (MOP, NOP, and MOP+NOP) in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Here, we expanded this cell model by expressing human KOP, MOP and NOP receptors individually or simultaneously (KOP, KOP+MOP, KOP+NOP and KOP+MOP+NOP). Radioligand binding with tritium‐labelled diprenorphine confirmed the expression of KOP receptors. Immunoblotting and immunocytochemistry indicated that the expressed KOP, MOP and NOP receptors are N‐linked glycoproteins and colocalized in cytoplasmic compartments. Acute application of the opioid receptor agonists— U‐69593, DAMGO and nociceptin— inhibited adenylate cyclase (AC) activity in cells expressing KOP, MOP and NOP receptors respectively. Buprenorphine, when applied acutely, inhibited AC activity to ~90% in cells expressing KOP+MOP+NOP receptors. Chronic exposure to buprenorphine induced concentration‐dependent AC superactivation in cells expressing KOP+NOP receptors, and the level of this superactivation was even higher in KOP+MOP+NOP‐expressing cells. Our study demonstrated that MOP receptor could enhance AC regulation in the presence of coexpressed KOP and NOP receptors, and NOP receptor is essential for concentration‐dependent AC superactivation elicited by chronic buprenorphine exposure.     

Three "hotspots" important for adenosine A(2B) receptor activation: a mutational analysis of transmembrane domains 4 and 5 and the second extracellular loop

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a major drug target and can be activated by a range of stimuli, from photons to proteins. Despite the progress made in the last decade in molecular and structural biology, their exact activation mechanism is still unknown. Here we describe new insights in specific regions essential in adenosine A_2B receptor activation (A_2BR), a typical class A GPCR. We applied unbiased random mutagenesis on the middle part of the human adenosine A_2BR, consisting of transmembrane domains 4 and 5 (TM4 and TM5) linked by extracellular loop 2 (EL2), and subsequently screened in a medium-throughput manner for gain-of-function and constitutively active mutants. For that purpose, we used a genetically engineered yeast strain (Saccharomyces cerevisiae MMY24) with growth as a read-out parameter. From the random mutagenesis screen, 12 different mutant receptors were identified that form three distinct clusters; at the top of TM4, in a cysteine-rich region in EL2, and at the intracellular side of TM5. All mutant receptors show a vast increase in agonist potency and most also displayed a significant increase in constitutive activity. None of these residues are supposedly involved in ligand binding directly. As a consequence, it appears that disrupting the relatively “silent” configuration of the wild-type receptor in each of the three clusters readily causes spontaneous receptor activity.     

Comparative MD Simulations Indicate a Dual Role for Arg1323.50 in Dopamine-Dependent D2R Activation

Residue Arg^3.50 belongs to the highly conserved DRY-motif of class A GPCRs, which is located at the bottom of TM3. On the one hand, Arg^3.50 has been reported to help stabilize the inactive state of GPCRs, but on the other hand has also been shown to be crucial for stabilizing active receptor conformations and mediating receptor-G protein coupling. The combined results of these studies suggest that the exact function of Arg^3.50 is likely to be receptor-dependent and must be characterized independently for every GPCR. Consequently, we now present comparative molecular-dynamics simulations that use our recently described inactive-state and Gα-bound active-state homology models of the dopamine D2 receptor (D2R), which are either bound to dopamine or ligand-free, performed to identify the function of Arg132^3.50 in D2R. Our results are consistent with a dynamic model of D2R activation in which Arg132^3.50 adopts a dual role, both by stabilizing the inactive-state receptor conformation and enhancing dopamine-dependent D2R-G protein coupling.     

Galpha-subunits differentially alter the conformation and agonist affinity of kappa-opioid receptors

Although ligand-induced conformational changes in G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are well-documented, there is little direct evidence for G protein-induced changes in GPCR conformation. To investigate this possibility, the effects of overexpressing Galpha-subunits (Galpha16 or Galphai2) with the kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) were examined. The changes in KOR conformation were subequently examined via the substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) in transmembrane domains 6 (TM6) and 7 (TM7) and extracellular loop 2 (EL2). Significant conformational changes were observed on TM7, the extracellular portion of TM6, and EL2. Seven SCAM-sensitive residues (S3107.33, F3147.37, and I3167.39 to Y3207.43) on TM7 presented a cluster pattern when the KOR was exposed to baseline amounts of G protein, and additional residues became sensitive upon overexpression of various G proteins. In TM7, S3117.34 and N3267.49 were found to be sensitive in Galpha16-overexpressed cells and Y3137.36, N3227.45, S3237.46, and L3297.52 in Galphai2-overexpressed cells. In addition, the degree of sensitivity for various TM7 residues was augmented, especially in Galphai2-overexpressed cells. A similar phenomenon was also observed for residues in TM6 and EL2. In addition to an enhanced sensitivity of certain residues, our findings also indicated that a slight rotation was predicted to occur in the upper part of TM7 upon G protein overexpression. These relatively modest conformational changes engendered by G protein overexpression had both profound and differential effects on the abilities of agonists to bind to KOR. These data are significant because they demonstrate that Galpha-subunits differentially modulate the conformation and agonist affinity of a prototypical GPCR.     

Antinociceptive action of NOP and opioid receptor agonists in the mouse orofacial formalin test

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) modulates several biological functions, including pain transmission via selective activation of a specific receptor named NOP. The aim of this study was the investigation of the antinociceptive properties of NOP agonists and their interaction with opioids in the trigeminal territory. The orofacial formalin (OFF) test in mice was used to investigate the antinociceptive potential associated to the activation of NOP and opioid receptors. Mice subjected to OFF test displayed the typical biphasic nociceptive response and sensitivity to opioid and NSAID drugs. Mice knockout for the NOP gene displayed a robust pronociceptive phenotype. The NOP selective agonist Ro 65-6570 (0.1–1 mg kg⁻¹) and morphine (0.1–10 mg kg⁻¹) elicited dose dependent antinociceptive effects in the OFF with the alkaloid showing larger effects; the isobologram analysis of their actions demonstrated an additive type of interaction. The mixed NOP/opioid receptor agonist cebranopadol elicited potent (0.01–0.1 mg kg⁻¹) and robust antinociceptive effects. In the investigated dose range, all drugs did not modify the motor performance of the mice in the rotarod test. Collectively the results of this study demonstrated that selective NOP agonists and particularly mixed NOP/opioid agonists are worthy of development as innovative drugs to treat painful conditions of the trigeminal territory.     

Structural insights into agonist-induced activation of G-protein-coupled receptors

Recent years have seen tremendous breakthroughs in structure determination of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In 2011, two agonist-bound active-state structures of rhodopsin have been published. Together with structures of several rhodopsin activation intermediates and a wealth of biochemical and spectroscopic information, they provide a unique structural framework on which to understand GPCR activation. Here we use this framework to compare the recent crystal structures of the agonist-bound active states of the β(2) adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR) and the A(2A) adenosine receptor (A(2A)AR). While activation of these three GPCRs results in rearrangements of TM5 and TM6, the extent of this conformational change varies considerably. Displacements of the cytoplasmic side of TM6 ranges between 3 and 8? depending on whether selective stabilizers of the active conformation are used (i.e. a G-protein peptide in the case of rhodopsin or a conformationally selective nanobody in the case of the β(2)AR) or not (A(2A)AR). The agonist-induced conformational changes in the ligand-binding pocket are largely receptor specific due to the different chemical nature of the agonists. However, several similarities can be observed, including a relocation of conserved residues W6.48 and F6.44 towards L5.51 and P5.50, and of I/L3.40 away from P5.50. This transmission switch links agonist binding to the movement of TM5 and TM6 through the rearrangement of the TM3-TM5-TM6 interface, and possibly constitutes a common theme of GPCR activation.     

Asn229 in the third helix of VPAC1 receptor is essential for receptor activation but not for receptor phosphorylation and internalization: comparison with Asn216 in VPAC2 receptor

After stimulation with agonist, G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) undergo conformational changes that allow activation of G proteins to transduce the signal, followed by phosphorylation by kinases and arrestin binding to promote receptor internalization. Actual paradigm, based on a study of GPCR-A/rhodopsin family, suggests that a network of interactions between conserved residues located in transmembrane (TM) domains (mainly TM3, TM6 and TM7) is involved in the molecular switch leading to GPCR activation.

We evaluated in CHO cells expressing the VPAC₁ receptor the role of the third transmembrane helix in agonist signalling by point mutation into Ala of the residues highly conserved in the secretin-family of receptors: Y²²⁴, N²²⁹, F²³⁰, W²³², E²³⁶, G²³⁷, Y²³⁹, L²⁴⁰. N²²⁹A VPAC₁ mutant was characterized by a decrease in both potency and efficacy of VIP stimulated adenylate cyclase activity, by the absence of agonist stimulated [Ca²⁺]_i increase, by a preserved receptor recognition of agonists and antagonist and by a preserved sensitivity to GTP suggesting the importance of that residue for efficient G protein activation. N²²⁹D mutant was not expressed at the membrane, and the N²²⁹Q with a conserved mutation was less affected than the A mutant. Agonist stimulated phosphorylation and internalization of N²²⁹A and N²²⁹Q VPAC₁ were unaffected. However, the re-expression of internalized mutant receptors, but not that of the wild type receptor, was rapidly reversed after VIP washing. Receptor phosphorylation, internalization and re-expression may be thus dissociated from G protein activation and linked to another active conformation that may influence its trafficking.

Mutation of that conserved amino acid in VPAC₂ could be investigated only by a conservative mutation (N²¹⁶Q) and led to a receptor with a low VIP stimulation of adenylate cyclase, receptor phosphorylation and internalization. This indicated the importance of the conserved N residue in the TM3 of that family of receptors.     

Ligand binding to the human MT2 melatonin receptor: the role of residues in transmembrane domains 3, 6, and 7

To better understand the mechanism of interactions between G-protein-coupled melatonin receptors and their ligands, our previously reported homology model of human MT2 receptor with docked 2-iodomelatonin was further refined and used to select residues within TM3, TM6, and TM7 potentially important for receptor-ligand interactions. Selected residues were mutated and radioligand-binding assay was used to test the binding affinities of hMT2 receptors transiently expressed in HEK293 cells. Our data demonstrate that residues N268 and A275 in TM6 as well as residues V291 and L295 in TM7 are essential for 2-iodomelatonin binding to the hMT2 receptor, while TM3 residues M120, G121, V124, and I125 may participate in binding of other receptor agonists and/or antagonists. Presented data also hint at possible specific interaction between the side-chain of Y188 in second extracellular loop and N-acetyl group of 2-iodomelatonin.     

Novel delta opioid receptor agonists exhibit differential stimulation of signaling pathways

A novel family of 1,3,5-trisubstituted 1,2,4-triazoles was discovered as potent and selective ligands for the δ opioid receptor by rational design. Compound 5b exhibited low-nanomolar in vitro binding affinity (IC₅₀ = 5.8 nM), excellent selectivity for the δ opioid receptor over the alternative μ and κ opioid receptors, full agonist efficacy in receptor down-regulation and MAP kinase activation assays, and low-efficacy partial agonist activity in stimulation of GTPγS binding. The apparent discrepancy observed in these functional assays may stem from different signaling pathways involved in each case, as found previously for other G-protein coupled receptors. More biological studies are underway to better understand the differential stimulation of signaling pathways by these novel compounds.     

Opioid and nociceptin receptors regulate cytokine and cytokine receptor expression

Opioids were originally discovered because of their ability to induce analgesia, but further investigation has shown that the opioids regulate the function of cells involved in the immune response. We suggest that the regulation of cytokine, chemokine, and cytokine receptor expression is a critical component of the immunomodulatory activity of the opioids. In this paper we review the literature dealing with the regulation of cytokine and cytokine receptor expression by agonists for the three major opioid receptor types (mu, kappa, and delta), and nociceptin, the natural agonist for the orphanin FQ/nociceptin receptor. Although the opioid receptors share a high degree of sequence homology, opposing roles between the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) and the mu opioid receptor (MOR) have become apparent. We suggest that activation of the KOR induces an anti-inflammatory response through the down-regulation of cytokine, chemokine and chemokine receptor expression, while activation of the MOR favors a pro-inflammatory response. Investigation into the opioid receptor-like (ORL1)/nociceptin system also suggests a role for this receptor as a down-regulator of immune function. These effects suggest a broad role for opioids in the modulation of the function of the immune system, and suggest possible targets for the development of new therapeutics for inflammatory and infectious diseases.     

Implication of the First and Third Extracellular Loops of the μ-Opioid Receptor in the Formation of the Ligand Binding Site: A Study Using Chimeric μ-Opioid/Angiotensin Receptors

Abstract: Recent studies on chimeric μ/δ-, μ/κ- and δ/κ-opioid receptors have suggested that extracellular loops of the receptors were involved in the discriminatory binding of selective ligands by controlling their entry into the transmembrane binding site. Since homochimeric opioid receptors are mostly informative in terms of selectivity, the role of extracellular loops was examined here by studying heterochimeric μ receptors where the totality or parts of extracellular loops were replaced by the corresponding regions of the receptor for angiotensin II. Chimeric μ receptors with extracellular loop EL1 or EL3 originating from the angiotensin receptor had 100-fold decreased affinities for opioids; the length of the first extracellular loop, which is one residue longer in angiotensin than μ receptors, was shown to be responsible for this situation. Substitution of the μ receptor second extracellular loop by that of the angiotensin receptor diminished by ∼10-fold the affinities for opioids. Since all chimeras had altered affinities for selective and nonselective ligands, we propose that extracellular domains of the μ receptor, particularly the first and third loops, constrain the relative positioning of the connected transmembrane domains where selective as well as nonselective contact points form the opioid binding site.     

Peptide design and structural characterization of a GPCR loop mimetic

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) control fundamental aspects of human physiology and behaviors. Knowledge of their structures, especially for the loop regions, is limited and has principally been obtained from homology models, mutagenesis data, low resolution structural studies, and high resolution studies of peptide models of receptor segments. We developed an alternate methodology for structurally characterizing GPCR loops, using the human S1P(4) first extracellular loop (E1) as a model system. This methodology uses computational peptide designs based on transmembrane domain (TM) model structures in combination with CD and NMR spectroscopy. The characterized peptides contain segments that mimic the self-assembling extracellular ends of TM 2 and TM 3 separated by E1, including residues R3.28(121) and E3.29(122) that are required for sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) binding and receptor activation in the S1P(4) receptor. The S1P(4) loop mimetic peptide interacted specifically with an S1P headgroup analog, O-phosphoethanolamine (PEA), as evidenced by PEA-induced perturbation of disulfide cross-linked coiled-coil first extracellular loop mimetic (CCE1a) (1)H and (15)N backbone amide chemical shifts. CCE1a was capable of weakly binding PEA near biologically relevant residues R29 and E30, which correspond to R3.28 and E3.29 in the full-length S1P(4) receptor, confirming that it has adopted a biologically relevant conformation. We propose that the combination of coiled-coil TM replacement and conformational stabilization with an interhelical disulfide bond is a general design strategy that promotes native-like structure for loops derived from GPCRs.     

Bioactive conformations of two seminal delta opioid receptor penta‐peptides inferred from free‐energy profiles

Delta‐opioid (DOP) receptors are members of the G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) sub‐family of opioid receptors, and are evolutionarily related, with homology exceeding 70%, to cognate mu‐opioid (MOP), kappa‐opioid (KOP), and nociceptin opioid (NOP) receptors. DOP receptors are considered attractive drug targets for pain management because agonists at these receptors are reported to exhibit strong antinociceptive activity with relatively few side effects. Among the most potent analgesics targeting the DOP receptor are the linear and cyclic enkephalin analogs known as DADLE (Tyr‐D ‐Ala‐Gly‐Phe‐D ‐Leu) and DPDPE (Tyr‐D ‐Pen‐Gly‐Phe‐D ‐Pen), respectively. Several computational and experimental studies have been carried out over the years to characterize the conformational profile of these penta‐peptides with the ultimate goal of designing potent peptidomimetic agonists for the DOP receptor. The computational studies published to date, however, have investigated only a limited range of timescales and used over‐simplified representations of the solvent environment. We provide here a thorough exploration of the conformational space of DADLE and DPDPE in an explicit solvent, using microsecond‐scale molecular dynamics and bias‐exchange metadynamics simulations. Free‐energy profiles derived from these simulations point to a small number of DADLE and DPDPE conformational minima in solution, which are separated by relatively small energy barriers. Candidate bioactive forms of these peptides are selected from identified common spatial arrangements of key pharmacophoric points within all sampled conformations. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 101: 21–27, 2014.     

A unique binding epitope for salvinorin A, a non-nitrogenous kappa opioid receptor agonist

Salvinorin A is a potent kappa opioid receptor (KOP) agonist with unique structural and pharmacological properties. This non-nitrogenous ligand lacks nearly all the structural features commonly associated with opioid ligand binding and selectivity. This study explores the structural basis to salvinorin A binding and selectivity using a combination of chimeric and single-point mutant opioid receptors. The experiments were designed based on previous models of salvinorin A that locate the ligand within a pocket formed by transmembrane (TM) II, VI, and VII. More traditional sites of opioid recognition were also explored, including the highly conserved aspartate in TM III (D138) and the KOP selectivity site E297, to determine the role, if any, that these residues play in binding and selectivity. The results indicate that salvinorin A recognizes a cluster of residues in TM II and VII, including Q115, Y119, Y312, Y313, and Y320. Based on the position of these residues within the receptor, and prior study on salvinorin A, a model is proposed that aligns the ligand vertically, between TM II and VII. In this orientation, the ligand spans residues that are spaced one to two turns down the face of the helices within the receptor cavity. The ligand is also in close proximity to EL-2 which, based on chimeric data, is proposed to play an indirect role in salvinorin A binding and selectivity.     

Effects on Inflammation of Newly-Synthesized Hexapeptide with Affinity to Opioid and Nociceptin Receptors

Following the discovery of the N/OFQ/NOP system and its modulatory role in physiological and pathophysiological processes, intensive study has started to find selective NOP ligands with hypothetic therapeutic potential. Among the agonists, a hexapeptide Ac-RYYRWK-NH₂ has been identified. It expresses high NOP receptor affinity and selectivity. Its molecule was used as a template, in which Tyr⁵ was substituted by original β²-tryptophan analogue (S)-2-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)propionic residue (compound HP3) The new compound activates both NOP and opioid receptors. Having in mind that classical opioids, as well as nociceptin, are involved in modulating pain and inflammation, we examined the anti-inflammatory effect of newly-synthesized peptide HP3 on carrageenan-induced peripheral inflammation, and compared it with that of indomethacin (3 mg/kg). It was found that HP3 in dose 40 μg/kg exerts weaker anti-inflammatory action in the first 180 min of the experiment, but is equally effective with indomethacin 3 mg/kg at the end of the observation. The HP3 effect is due mainly of the activation of opioid receptors.     

Inactive-state preassembly of G(q)-coupled receptors and G(q) heterotrimers

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transmit signals by forming active-state complexes with heterotrimeric G proteins. It has been suggested that some GPCRs also assemble with G proteins before ligand-induced activation and that inactive-state preassembly facilitates rapid and specific G protein activation. However, no mechanism of preassembly has been described, and no functional consequences of preassembly have been demonstrated. Here we show that M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M3R) form inactive-state complexes with G(q) heterotrimers in intact cells. The M3R C terminus is sufficient, and a six-amino-acid polybasic sequence distal to helix 8 ((565)KKKRRK(570)) is necessary for preassembly with G(q). Replacing this sequence with six alanine residues prevents preassembly, slows the rate of G(q) activation and decreases steady-state agonist sensitivity. That other G(q)-coupled receptors possess similar polybasic regions and also preassemble with G(q) suggests that these GPCRs may use a common preassembly mechanism to facilitate activation of G(q) heterotrimers.     

Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of N-substituted spiropiperidines as nociceptin receptor ligands

A series of N-substituted analogs based upon the spiropiperidine core of 1 was synthesized and exhibited high binding affinity to the nociceptin (NOP) receptor. The selectivities against other known opioid receptors were determined.     

Constitutive activation of angiotensin II type 1 receptor alters the orientation of transmembrane Helix-2

A key step in transmembrane (TM) signal transduction by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the ligand-induced conformational change of the receptor, which triggers the activation of a guanine nucleotide-binding protein. GPCRs contain a seven-TM helical structure essential for signal transduction in response to a large variety of sensory and hormonal signals. Primary structure comparison of GPCRs has shown that the second TM helix contains a highly conserved Asp residue, which is critical for agonist activation in these receptors. How conformational changes in TM2 relate to signal transduction by a GPCR is not known, because activation-induced conformational changes in TM2 helix have not been measured. Here we use modification of reporter cysteines to measure water accessibility at specific residues in TM2 of the type 1 receptor for the octapeptide hormone angiotensin II. Activation-dependent changes in the accessibility of Cys76 on TM2 were measured in constitutively activated mutants. These changes were directly correlated with measurement of function, establishing the link between physical changes in TM2 and function. Accessibility changes were measured at several consecutive residues on TM2, which suggest that TM2 undergoes a transmembrane movement in response to activation. This is the first report of in situ measurement of TM2 movement in a GPCR.