Competition of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases for tRNA ensures the accuracy of aminoacylation.

The accuracy of protein biosynthesis rests on the high fidelity with which aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases discriminate between tRNAs. Correct aminoacylation depends not only on identity elements (nucleotides in certain positions) in tRNA (1), but also on competition between different synthetases for a given tRNA (2). Here we describe in vivo and in vitro experiments which demonstrate how variations in the levels of synthetases and tRNA affect the accuracy of aminoacylation. We show in vivo that concurrent overexpression of Escherichia coli tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase abolishes misacylation of supF tRNA(Tyr) with glutamine in vivo by overproduced glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase. In an in vitro competition assay, we have confirmed that the overproduction mischarging phenomenon observed in vivo is due to competition between the synthetases at the level of aminoacylation. Likewise, we have been able to examine the role competition plays in the identity of a non-suppressor tRNA of ambiguous identity, tRNA(Glu). Finally, with this assay, we show that the identity of a tRNA and the accuracy with which it is recognized depend on the relative affinities of the synthetases for the tRNA. The in vitro competition assay represents a general method of obtaining qualitative information on tRNA identity in a competitive environment (usually only found in vivo) during a defined step in protein biosynthesis, aminoacylation. In addition, we show that the discriminator base (position 73) and the first base of the anticodon are important for recognition by E. coli tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase.     

Genetic selection for active E.coli amber tRNA(Asn) exclusively led to glutamine inserting suppressors.

Suppressor tRNAs are useful tools for determining identity elements which define recognition of tRNAs in vivo by their cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. This study was aimed at the isolation of active amber tRNA(Asn). Nineteen mutated tRNA(Asn)CUA having amber suppressor activity were selected by an in vivo genetic screen, and all exclusively inserted glutamine. From analysis of the different mutations it is concluded that glutamine accepting activity was obtained upon reducing the interaction strength between the first base pair of the tRNA(Asn)CUA by direct or indirect effects. Failure to isolate tRNA(Asn)CUA suppressors charged with asparagine as well as other evolutionary related amino acids is discussed.     

Conversion of a methionine initiator tRNA into a tryptophan-inserting elongator tRNA in vivo.

The role of the anticodon and discriminator base in aminoacylation of tRNAs with tryptophan has been explored using a recently developed in vivo assay based on initiation of protein synthesis by mischarged mutants of the Escherichia coli initiator tRNA. Substitution of the methionine anticodon CAU with the tryptophan anticodon CCA caused tRNA(fMet) to be aminoacylated with both methionine and tryptophan in vivo, as determined by analysis of the amino acids inserted by the mutant tRNA at the translational start site of a reporter protein containing a tryptophan initiation codon. Conversion of the discriminator base of tRNA(CCA)fMet from A73 to G73, the base present in tRNA(Trp), eliminated the in vivo methionine acceptor activity of the tRNA and resulted in complete charging with tryptophan. Single base changes in the anticodon of tRNA(CCA)fMet containing G73 from CCA to UCA, GCA, CAA, and CCG (changes underlined) essentially abolished tryptophan insertion, showing that all three anticodon bases specify the tryptophan identity of the tRNA. The important role of G73 in tryptophan identity was confirmed using mutants of an opal suppressor derivative of tRNA(Trp). Substitution of G73 with A73, C73, or U73 resulted in a large loss of the ability of the tRNA to suppress an opal stop codon in a reporter protein. Base pair substitutions at the first three positions of the acceptor stem of the suppressor tRNA caused 2-12-fold reductions in the efficiency of suppression without loss of specificity for aminoacylation of the tRNA with tryptophan.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Competition of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases for tRNA ensures the accuracy of aminoacylation

The accuracy of protein biosynthesis rests on the high fidelity with which aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases discriminate between tRNAs. Correct aminoacylation depends not only on identity elements (nucleotides in certain positions) in tRNA (1), but also on competition between different synthetases for a given tRNA (2). Here we describe in vivo and in vitro experiments which demonstrate how variations in the levels of synthetases and tRNA affect the accuracy of aminoacylation. We show in vivo that concurrent overexpression of Escherichia coli tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase abolishes misacylation of supF tRNA^Tyr with glutamine in vivo by overproduced glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase. In an in vitro competition assay, we have confirmed that the overproduction mischarging phenomenon observed in vivo is due to competition between the synthetases at the level of aminoacylation. Likewise, we have been able to examine the role competition plays in the identity of a non-suppressor tRNA of ambiguous identity, tRNA^Glu. Finally, with this assay, we show that the identity of a tRNA and the accuracy with which it is recognized depend on the relative affinities of the synthetases for the tRNA. The in vitro competition assay represents a general method of obtaining qualitative information on tRNA identity in a competitive environment (usually only found in vivo) during a defined step in protein biosynthesis, aminoacylation. In addition, we show that the discriminator base (position 73) and the first base of the anticodon are important for recognition by E. coli tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase.     

Covariation of a specificity-determining structural motif in an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase and a tRNA identity element

Transfer RNA (tRNA) identity determinants help preserve the specificity of aminoacylation in vivo, and prevent cross-species interactions. Here, we investigate covariation between the discriminator base (N73) element in histidine tRNAs and residues in the histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HisRS) motif 2 loop. A model of the Escherichia coli HisRS--tRNA(His) complex predicts an interaction between the prokaryotic conserved glutamine 118 of the motif 2 loop and cytosine 73. The substitution of Gln 118 in motif 2 with glutamate decreased discrimination between cytosine and uracil some 50-fold, but left overall rates of adenylation and aminoacylation unaffected. By contrast, substitutions at neighboring Glu 115 and Arg 121 affected both adenylation and aminoacylation, consistent with their predicted involvement in both half-reactions. Additional evidence for the involvement of the motif 2 loop was provided by functional analysis of a hybrid Saccharomyces cerevisiae-- E. coli HisRS possessing the 11 amino acid motif 2 loop of the yeast enzyme. Despite an overall decreased activity of nearly 1000-fold relative to the E. coli enzyme, the chimera nevertheless exhibited a modest preference for the yeast tRNA(His) over the E. coli tRNA, and preferred wild-type yeast tRNA(His) to a variant with C at the discriminator position. These experiments suggest that part of, but not all of, the specificity is provided by the motif 2 loop. The close interaction between enzyme loop and RNA sequence elements suggested by these experiments reflects a covariation between enzyme and tRNA that may have acted to preserve aminoacylation fidelity over evolutionary time.     

Recognition of pyrrolysine tRNA by the Desulfitobacterium hafniense pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase

Pyrrolysine (Pyl), the 22nd co-translationally inserted amino acid, is incorporated in response to a UAG amber stop codon. Pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase (PylRS) attaches Pyl to its cognate tRNA, the special amber suppressor tRNA(Pyl). The genes for tRNA(Pyl) (pylT) and PylRS (pylS) are found in all members of the archaeal family Methanosarcinaceae, and in Desulfitobacterium hafniense. The activation and aminoacylation properties of D. hafniense PylRS and the nature of the tRNA(Pyl) identity elements were determined by measuring the ability of 24 mutant tRNA(Pyl) species to be aminoacylated with the pyrrolysine analog N-epsilon-cyclopentyloxycarbonyl-l-lysine. The discriminator base G73 and the first base pair (G1.C72) in the acceptor stem were found to be major identity elements. Footprinting analysis showed that PylRS binds tRNA(Pyl) predominantly along the phosphate backbone of the T-loop, the D-stem and the acceptor stem. Significant contacts with the anticodon arm were not observed. The tRNA(Pyl) structure contains the highly conserved T-loop contact U54.A58 and position 57 is conserved as a purine, but the canonical T- to D-loop contact between positions 18 and 56 was not present. Unlike most tRNAs, the tRNA(Pyl) anticodon was shown not to be important for recognition by bacterial PylRS.     

tRNA leucine identity and recognition sets

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are grouped into two classes based on the structure of their variable loop. In Escherichia coli, tRNAs from three isoaccepting groups are classified as type II. Leucine tRNAs comprise one such group. We used both in vivo and in vitro approaches to determine the nucleotides that are required for tRNA(Leu) function. In addition, to investigate the role of the tRNA fold, we compared the in vivo and in vitro characteristics of type I tRNA(Leu) variants with their type II counterparts.A minimum of six conserved tRNA(Leu) nucleotides were required to change the amino acid identity and recognition of a type II tRNA(Ser) amber suppressor from a serine to a leucine residue. Five of these nucleotides affect tRNA tertiary structure; the G15-C48 tertiary "Levitt base-pair" in tRNA(Ser) was changed to A15-U48; the number of nucleotides in the alpha and beta regions of the D-loop was changed to achieve the positioning of G18 and G19 that is found in all tRNA(Leu); a base was inserted at position 47n between the base-paired extra stem and the T-stem; in addition the G73 "discriminator" base of tRNA(Ser) was changed to A73. This minimally altered tRNA(Ser) exclusively inserted leucine residues and was an excellent in vitro substrate for LeuRS. In a parallel experiment, nucleotide substitutions were made in a glutamine-inserting type I tRNA (RNA(SerDelta); an amber suppressor in which the tRNA(Ser) type II extra-stem-loop is replaced by a consensus type I loop). This "type I" swap experiment was successful both in vivo and in vitro but required more nucleotide substitutions than did the type II swap. The type I and II swaps revealed differences in the contributions of the tRNA(Leu) acceptor stem base-pairs to tRNA(Leu) function: in the type I, but not the type II fold, leucine specificity was contingent on the presence of the tRNA(Leu) acceptor stem sequence. The type I and II tRNAs used in this study differed only in the sequence and structure of the variable loop. By altering this loop, and thereby possibly introducing subtle changes into the overall tRNA fold, it became possible to detect otherwise cryptic contributions of the acceptor stem sequence to recognition by LeuRS. Possible reasons for this effect are discussed.     

In vitro conversion of a methionine to a glutamine-acceptor tRNA

A derivative of Escherichia coli tRNAfMet containing an altered anticodon sequence, CUA, has been enzymatically synthesized in vitro. The variant tRNA was prepared by excision of the normal anticodon, CAU, in a limited digestion of intact tRNAfMet with RNase A, followed by insertion of the CUA sequence into the anticodon loop with T4 RNA ligase and polynucleotide kinase. The altered methionine tRNA showed a large enhancement in the rate of aminoacylation by glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and a large decrease in the rate of aminoacylation by methionyl-tRNA synthetase. Measurement of kinetic parameters for the charging reaction by the cognate and noncognate enzymes revealed that the modified tRNA is a better acceptor for glutamine than for methionine. The rate of mischarging is similar to that previously reported for a tryptophan amber suppressor tRNA containing the anticodon CUA, su+7 tRNATrp, which is aminoacylated with glutamine both in vivo and in vitro [Yaniv, M., Folk, W. R., Berg, P., & Soll, L. (1974) J. Mol. Biol. 86, 245-260; Yarus, M., Knowlton, R. E., & Soll, L. (1977) in Nucleic Acid-Protein Recognition (Vogel, H., Ed.) pp 391-408, Academic Press, New York]. The present results provide additional evidence that the specificity of aminoacylation by glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase is sensitive to small changes in the nucleotide sequence of noncognate tRNAs and that uridine in the middle position of the anticodon is involved in the recognition of tRNA substrates by this enzyme.     

Mischarging mutants of Su+2 glutamine tRNA in E. coli. II. Amino acid specificities of the mutant tRNAs

Among the mischarging mutants isolated from strains with Su+2 glutamine tRNA, two double-mutants, A37A29 and A37C38, have been suggested to insert tryptophan at the UAG amber mutation site as determined by the suppression patterns of a set of tester mutants of bacteria and phages (Yamao et al., 1988). In this paper, we screened temperature sensitive mutants of E. coli in which the mischarging suppression was abolished even at the permissive temperature. Four such mutants were obtained and they were identified as the mutants of a structural gene for tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (trpS). Authentic trpS mutations, such as trpS5 or trpS18, also restricted the mischarging suppression. These results strongly support the previous prediction that the mutant tRNAs of Su+2, A37A29 and A37C38, are capable of interacting with tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase and being misaminoacylated with tryptophan in vivo. However, in an assay to determine the specificity of the mutant glutamin tRNAs, we detected predominantly glutamine, but not any other amino acid, being inserted at an amber codon in vivo to any significant degree. We conclude that the mutant tRNAs still accept mostly glutamine, but can accept tryptophan in an extent for mischarging suppression. Since the amber suppressors of Su+7 tryptophan tRNA and the mischarging mutants of Su+3 tyrosine tRNA are charged with glutamine, structural similarity among the tRNAs for glutamine, tryptophan and tyrosine is discussed.     

Selection of tRNA(Asp) amber suppressor mutants having alanine, arginine, glutamine, and lysine identity.

Elements that confer identity to a tRNA in the cellular environment, where all aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are competing for substrates, may be delineated by in vivo experiments using suppressor tRNAs. Here we describe the selection of active Escherichia coli tRNAAsp amber mutants and analyze their identity. Starting from a library containing randomly mutated tRNA(CUA)Asp genes, we isolated four amber suppressors presenting either lysine, alanine, or glutamine activity. Two of them, presenting mainly alanine or lysine activity, were further submitted to a second round of mutagenesis selection in order to improve their efficiency of suppression. Eleven suppressors were isolated, each containing two or three mutations. Ten presented identities of the two parental mutants, whereas one had switched from lysine to arginine identity. Analysis of the different mutants revealed (or confirmed for some nucleotides) their role as positive and/or negative determinants in AlaRS, LysRS, and ArgRS recognition. More generally, it appears that tRNAAsp presents identity characteristics closely related to those of tRNALys, as well as a structural basis for acquiring alanine or arginine identity upon moderate mutational changes; these consist of addition or suppression of the corresponding positive or negative determinants, as well as tertiary interactions. Failure to isolate aspartic acid-inserting suppressors is probably due to elimination of the important G34 identity element and its replacement by an antideterminant when changing the anticodon of the tRNAAsp to the CUA triplet.     

Control of cell-free protein synthesis by amino acids: effects on tRNA charging

In order to resolve the observation that addition of glutamine and glutamate appears to be of particular importance in enhancing the activity of a cell-free protein synthesis system derived from rat liver (Manchester and Tyobeka, 1980), we have measured the KM of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases towards amino acids and the extent of aminoacylation of tRNA under the conditions of our earlier experiments. During incubation of the cell-free system in the presence of an amino acid mixture the extent of acylation to tRNA of 15 amino acids studied showed no clear change from initial time values. When incubation took place in the absence of added amino acids, however, the levels of glutamate and glutamine bound to their appropriate tRNAs dropped more rapidly and to lower levels than for other amino acids except tryptophan. The pronounced drop for these two amino acids does not seem to result from an abnormally high KM value for the synthetases towards the respective amino acids, nor an abnormally low Vmax, but probably from the fact that the amounts of glutamyl and glutaminyl-tRNA in the cell-free system are comparatively low.     

Construction of Escherichia coli amber suppressor tRNA genes. III. Determination of tRNA specificity

Using synthetic oligonucleotides, we have constructed a collection of Escherichia coli amber suppressor tRNA genes. In order to determine their specificities, these tRNAs were each used to suppress an amber (UAG) nonsense mutation in the E. coli dihydrofolate reductase gene fol. The mutant proteins were purified and subjected to N-terminal sequence analysis to determine which amino acid had been inserted by the suppressor tRNAs at the position of the amber codon. The suppressors can be classified into three groups on the basis of the protein sequence information. Class I suppressors, tRNA(CUAAla2), tRNA(CUAGly1), tRNA(CUAHisA), tRNA(CUALys) and tRNA(CUAProH), inserted the predicted amino acid. The class II suppressors, tRNA(CUAGluA), tRNA(CUAGly2) and tRNA(CUAIle1) were either partially or predominantly mischarged by the glutamine aminoacyl tRNA synthetase. The class III suppressors, tRNA(CUAArg), tRNA(CUAAspM), tRNA(CUAIle2), tRNA(CUAThr2), tRNA(CUAMet(m)) and tRNA(CUAVal) inserted predominantly lysine.     

Comparative X-ray structure analysis of human and Escherichia coli tRNA(Gly) acceptor stem microhelices

tRNA identity elements assure the correct aminoacylation of tRNAs by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases with the cognate amino acid. The tRNA^Gly/glycyl-tRNA sythetase system is member of the so-called ‘class II system’ in which the tRNA determinants consist of rather simple elements. These are mostly located in the tRNA acceptor stem and in the glycine case additionally the discriminator base at position 73 is required. Within the glycine-tRNA synthetases, the archaebacterial/human and the eubacterial sytems differ with respect to their protein structures and the required tRNA identity elements, suggesting a unique evolutionary divergence.In this study, we present a comparison between the crystal structures of the eubacterial Escherichia coli and the human tRNA^Gly acceptor stem microhelices and their surrounding hydration patterns.     

The translational efficiency of tRNA is a property of the anticodon arm

We have reciprocally transplanted the anticodon arm sequences of a set of amber suppressor tRNA genes, using recombinant DNA techniques. By this means, a very efficient suppressor may be converted to a poor one, and the poorest tRNA to the efficiency of the best one. In tRNA molecules of normal 2 degrees and 3 degrees structure, the suppressor efficiencies of different composite tRNAs having the same anticodon arm sequence are approximately the same. Large numbers of simultaneous changes throughout the rest of the molecule do not affect the efficiency. Selective nucleotide modification as a result of varied anticodon arm sequences cannot explain these efficiencies. Efficiencies are also unlikely to differ because of selective aminoacylation. Measurement of in vivo tRNA shows, however, that tRNA levels do vary if the anticodon arm sequence is changed. If tRNA levels are normalized, the anticodon arm effect on the translational efficiency remains. Therefore, different anticodon arms, all of normal secondary structure, are not equivalent in translation. The most efficient sequences in this series resemble those found in natural tRNAs associated with similar anticodons, as is proposed in the extended anticodon theory (Yarus, M. (1982) Science 218, 646-652). These molecules also provide some information on the specificity of nucleotide modification enzymes and on determinants of the steady-state tRNA level.     

Suppression of amber codons in vivo as evidence that mutants derived from Escherichia coli initiator tRNA can act at the step of elongation in protein synthesis

The absence of a Watson-Crick base pair at the end of the amino acid acceptor stem is one of the features which distinguishes prokaryotic initiator tRNAs as a class from all other tRNAs. We show that this structural feature prevents Escherichia coli initiator tRNA from acting as an elongator in protein synthesis in vivo. We generated a mutant of E. coli initiator tRNA in which the anticodon sequence is changed from CAU to CUA (the T35A36 mutant). This mutant tRNA has the potential to read the amber termination codon UAG. We then coupled this mutation to others which change the C1.A72 mismatch at the end of the acceptor stem to either a U1:A72 base pair (T1 mutant) or a C1:G72 base pair (G72 mutant). Transformation of E. coli CA274 (HfrC Su- lacZ125am trpEam) with multicopy plasmids carrying the mutant initiator tRNA genes show that mutant tRNAs carrying changes in both the anticodon sequence and the acceptor stem suppress amber codons in vivo, whereas mutant tRNA with changes in the anticodon sequence alone does not. Mutant tRNAs with the above anticodon sequence change are aminoacylated with glutamine in vitro. Measurement of kinetic parameters for aminoacylation by E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase show that both the nature of the base pair at the end of the acceptor stem and the presence or absence of a base pair at this position can affect aminoacylation kinetics. We discuss the implications of this result on recognition of tRNAs by E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase.