Oncogenic Ras activation of Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase-independent pathways is sufficient to cause tumorigenic transformation.

Substantial evidence supports a critical role for the activation of the Raf-1/MEK/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in oncogenic Ras-mediated transformation. For example, dominant negative mutants of Raf-1, MEK, and mitogen-activated protein kinase all inhibit Ras transformation. Furthermore, the observation that plasma membrane-localized Raf-1 exhibits the same transforming potency as oncogenic Ras suggests that Raf-1 activation alone is sufficient to mediate full Ras transforming activity. However, the recent identification of other candidate Ras effectors (e.g., RalGDS and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase) suggests that activation of other downstream effector-mediated signaling pathways may also mediate Ras transforming activity. In support of this, two H-Ras effector domain mutants, H-Ras(12V, 37G) and H-Ras(12V, 40C), which are defective for Raf binding and activation, induced potent tumorigenic transformation of some strains of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. These Raf-binding defective mutants of H-Ras induced a transformed morphology that was indistinguishable from that induced by activated members of Rho family proteins. Furthermore, the transforming activities of both of these mutants were synergistically enhanced by activated Raf-1 and inhibited by the dominant negative RhoA(19N) mutant, indicating that Ras may cause transformation that occurs via coordinate activation of Raf-dependent and -independent pathways that involves Rho family proteins. Finally, cotransfection of H-Ras(12V, 37G) and H-Ras(12V, 40C) resulted in synergistic cooperation of their focus-forming activities, indicating that Ras activates at least two Raf-independent, Ras effector-mediated signaling events.     

Activation of Rac1, RhoA, and mitogen-activated protein kinases is required for Ras transformation.

Although substantial evidence supports a critical role for the activation of Raf-1 and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in oncogenic Ras-mediated transformation, recent evidence suggests that Ras may activate a second signaling pathway which involves the Ras-related proteins Rac1 and RhoA. Consequently, we used three complementary approaches to determine the contribution of Rac1 and RhoA function to oncogenic Ras-mediated transformation. First, whereas constitutively activated mutants of Rac1 and RhoA showed very weak transforming activity when transfected alone, their coexpression with a weakly transforming Raf-1 mutant caused a greater than 35-fold enhancement of transforming activity. Second, we observed that coexpression of dominant negative mutants of Rac1 and RhoA reduced oncogenic Ras transforming activity. Third, activated Rac1 and RhoA further enhanced oncogenic Ras-triggered morphologic transformation, as well as growth in soft agar and cell motility. Finally, we also observed that kinase-deficient MAPKs inhibited Ras transformation. Taken together, these data support the possibility that oncogenic Ras activation of Rac1 and RhoA, coupled with activation of the Raf/MAPK pathway, is required to trigger the full morphogenic and mitogenic consequences of oncogenic Ras transformation.     

RAS signalling is abnormal in a c-raf1 MEK1 double mutant.

A mutant rat cell clone that suppresses the transformation defects of RAS effector loop substitutions is heterozygous for mutations in c-raf1 and MEK1. The mutant cells can be transformed by many otherwise defective RAS effector mutants, including RAS genes with the effector regions of distantly related GTPases, even though the encoded RAS proteins do not interact with either the mutant or wild-type RAF in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. While the significance of the c-raf1 mutation is unclear, the MEK1 mutation increases MEK1 activity and leads to activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. The mutant MEK1 is coupled to the epidermal growth factor pathway but exhibits decreased physical interaction with RAF. When overexpressed, the MEK1 mutation is transforming and causes hyperphosphorylation of RAF. Signalling from RAS to MEK1 may be mediated by something other than RAF alone, but signalling through MEK1 is probably sufficient for RAS transformation.     

Differential Effects of Protein Kinase A on Ras Effector Pathways

Ras mutants with the ability to interact with different effectors have played a critical role in the identification of Ras-dependent signaling pathways. We used two mutants, Ras^S35 and Ras^G37, which differ in their ability to bind Raf-1, to examine Ras-dependent signaling in thyroid epithelial cells. Wistar rat thyroid cells are dependent upon thyrotropin (TSH) for growth. Although TSH-stimulated mitogenesis requires Ras, TSH activates protein kinase A (PKA) and downregulates signaling through Raf and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade. Cells expressing Ras^S35, a mutant which binds Raf, or Ras^G37, a mutant which binds RalGDS, exhibited TSH-independent proliferation. Ras^S35 stimulated morphological transformation and anchorage-independent growth. Ras^G37 stimulated proliferation but not transformation as measured by these indices. TSH exerted markedly different effects on the Ras mutants and transiently repressed MAPK phosphorylation in Ras^S35-expressing cells. In contrast, TSH stimulated MAPK phosphorylation and growth in cells expressing Ras^G37. The Ras mutants, in turn, exerted differential effects on TSH signaling. Ras^S35 abolished TSH-stimulated changes in cell morphology and thyroglobulin expression, while Ras^G37 had no effect on these activities. Together, the data indicate that cross talk between Ras and PKA discriminates between distinct Ras effector pathways.     

Regulation of the protein kinase Raf-1 by oncogenic Ras through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, Cdc42/Rac and Pak

Activation of the protein kinase Raf-1 is a complex process involving association with the GTP-bound form of Ras (Ras-GTP), membrane translocation and both serine/threonine and tyrosine phosphorylation (reviewed in [1]). We have reported previously that p21-activated kinase 3 (Pak3) upregulates Raf-1 through direct phosphorylation on Ser338 [2]. Here, we investigated the origin of the signal for Pak-mediated Raf-1 activation by examining the role of the small GTPase Cdc42, Rac and Ras, and of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase. Pak3 acted synergistically with either Cdc42V12 or Rac1V12 to stimulate the activities of Raf-1, Raf-CX, a membrane-localized Raf-1 mutant, and Raf-1 mutants defective in Ras binding. Raf-1 mutants defective in Ras binding were also readily activated by RasV12. This indirect activation of Raf-1 by Ras was blocked by a dominant-negative mutant of Pak, implicating an alternative Ras effector pathway in Pak-mediated Raf-1 activation. Subsequently, we show that Pak-mediated Raf-1 activation is upregulated by both RasV12C40, a selective activator of PI 3-kinase, and p110-CX, a constitutively active PI 3-kinase. In addition, p85Delta, a mutant of the PI 3-kinase regulatory subunit, inhibited the stimulated activity of Raf-1. Pharmacological inhibitors of PI 3-kinase also blocked both activation and Ser338 phosphorylation of Raf-1 induced by epidermal growth factor (EGF). Thus, Raf-1 activation by Ras is achieved through a combination of both physical interaction and indirect mechanisms involving the activation of a second Ras effector, PI 3-kinase, which directs Pak-mediated regulatory phosphorylation of Raf-1.     

Activation of the Raf/MAP kinase cascade by the Ras-related protein TC21 is required for the TC21-mediated transformation of NIH 3T3 cells

TC21 is a member of the Ras superfamily of small GTP-binding proteins and, like Ras, has been implicated in the regulation of growth-stimulating pathways. Point mutations introduced into TC21 based on equivalent H-Ras oncogenic mutations are transforming in cultured cells, and oncogenic mutations in TC21 have been isolated from several human tumours. The mechanism of TC21 signalling in transformation is poorly understood. While activation of the serine/threonine kinases Raf-1 and B-Raf has been implicated in signalling pathways leading to transformation by H-Ras, it has been argued that TC21 does not activate Raf-1 or B-Raf. Since the Raf-signalling pathway is important in transformation by other Ras proteins, we assessed whether the Raf pathway is important to transformation by TC21. Raf-1 and B-Raf are constitutively active in TC21-transformed cells and the ERK/MAPK cascade is required for the maintenance of the transformed state. We demonstrate that oncogenic V23 TC21, like Ras, interacts with Raf-1 and B-Raf (but not with A-Raf), resulting in the translocation of the Raf proteins to the plasma membrane and in their activation. Furthermore, using point mutations in the effector loop of TC21, we show that the interaction of TC21 with Raf-1 is crucial for transformation.     

TC21 causes transformation by Raf-independent signaling pathways.

Although the Ras-related protein TC21/R-Ras2 has only 55% amino acid identity with Ras proteins, mutated forms of TC21 exhibit the same potent transforming activity as constitutively activated forms of Ras. Therefore, like Ras, TC21 may activate signaling pathways that control normal cell growth and differentiation. To address this possibility, we determined if regulators and effectors of Ras are also important for controlling TC21 activity. First, we determined that Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factors (SOS1 and RasGRF/CDC25) synergistically enhanced wild-type TC21 activity in vivo and that Ras GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs; p120-GAP and NF1-GAP) stimulated wild-type TC21 GTP hydrolysis in vitro. Thus, extracellular signals that activate Ras via SOS1 activation may cause coordinate activation of Ras and TC21. Second, we determined if Raf kinases were effectors for TC21 transformation. Unexpectedly, yeast two-hybrid binding analyses showed that although both Ras and TC21 could interact with the isolated Ras-binding domain of Raf-1, only Ras interacted with full-length Raf-1, A-Raf, or B-Raf. Consistent with this observation, we found that Ras- but not TC21-transformed NIH 3T3 cells possessed constitutively elevated Raf-1 and B-Raf kinase activity. Thus, Raf kinases are effectors for Ras, but not TC21, signaling and transformation. We conclude that common upstream signals cause activation of Ras and TC21, but activated TC21 controls cell growth via distinct Raf-independent downstream signaling pathways.     

Raf-1 N-terminal sequences necessary for Ras-Raf interaction and signal transduction.

Raf-1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase that transduces signals from cell surface receptors to the nucleus. Interaction of Ras with a regulatory domain in the N-terminal half of Raf-1 is postulated to regulate Raf-1 protein kinase and signaling activities. To better understand molecular interactions of Ras with Raf-1 and regulation of the Raf-1 kinase, a panel of Raf-1 N-terminal mutants expressed in the baculovirus-insect cell system was used for mapping the precise region necessary for Ras interaction in the context of full-length, functional Raf-1 kinase. An 80-amino-acid sequence in Raf-1 between positions 53 and 132 was found to confer the ability to bind Ras protein in vitro and in infected insect cells. Deletion of residues 53 to 132 abolished Raf-1 kinase activation by Ras in insect cells, indicating that activation of the Raf-1 kinase by Ras requires the capacity to physically interact with Ras. By contrast, deletion of this Ras-binding site did not diminish activation of Raf-1 kinase by Src, implying that Src and Ras can activate Raf-1 through independent mechanisms. Significantly, Raf-1 mutants lacking the entire zinc finger motif or containing substitutions of two critical cysteine residues in the zinc finger retained the ability to bind Ras and to be activated by this interaction. Consistent with results obtained in the baculovirus-insect cell system, deletion of residues 53 to 132 but not mutations in the zinc finger motif abrogated the ability of kinase-inactive, dominant negative Raf-1 to block Ras-mediated signaling in Xenopus oocytes. Together, these results provide evidence that the direct physical interaction of Ras with Raf-1 amino acids 53 to 132 is required for activation of the Raf-1 kinase and signaling activities by Ras but not by Src. Furthermore, the adjacent zinc finger motif in Raf-1 is not essential either for interaction with Ras or for activation of the Raf-1 kinase.     

A ras effector domain mutant which is temperature sensitive for cellular transformation: interactions with GTPase-activating protein and NF-1.

A series of v-rasH effector domain mutants were analyzed for their ability to transform rat 2 cells at either low or high temperatures. Three mutants were found to be significantly temperature sensitive: Ile-36 changed to Leu, Ser-39 changed to Cys (S39C), and Arg-41 changed to Leu. Of these, the codon 39 mutant (S39C) showed the greatest degree of temperature sensitivity. When the same mutation was analyzed in the proto-oncogene form of ras(c-rasH), this gene was also found to be temperature sensitive for transformation. Biochemical analysis of the proteins encoded by v-rasH(S39C) and c-rasH(S39C) demonstrated that the encoded p21ras proteins were stable and bound guanine nucleotides in vivo at permissive and nonpermissive temperatures. On the basis of these findings, it is likely that the temperature-sensitive phenotype results from an inability of the mutant (S39C) p21ras to interact properly with the ras target effector molecule(s) at the nonpermissive temperature. We therefore analyzed the interaction between the c-rasH(S39C) protein and the potential target molecules GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and the GAP-related domain of NF-1, on the basis of stimulation of the mutant p21ras GTPase activity by these molecules in vitro. Assays conducted across a range of temperatures revealed no temperature sensitivity for stimulation of the mutant protein, compared with that of authentic c-rasH protein. We conclude that for this mutant, there is a dissociation between the stimulation of p21ras GTPase activity by GAP and the GAP-related domain NF-1 and their potential target function. Our results are also consistent with the existence of a distinct, as-yet-unidentified effector for mammalian ras proteins.     

A human protein selected for interference with Ras function interacts directly with Ras and competes with Raf1.

The overexpression of some human proteins can cause interference with the Ras signal transduction pathway in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The functional block is located at the level of the effector itself, since these proteins do not suppress activating mutations further downstream in the same pathway. We now demonstrate, with in vivo and in vitro experiments, that the protein encoded by one human cDNA (clone 99) can interact directly with yeast Ras2p and with human H-Ras protein, and we have named this gene rin1 (Ras interaction/interference). The interaction between Ras and Rin1 is enhanced when Ras is bound to GTP. Rin1 is not able to interact with either an effector mutant or a dominant negative mutant of H-Ras. Thus, Rin1 displays a human H-Ras interaction profile that is the same as that seen for Raf1 and yeast adenylyl cyclase, two known effectors of Ras. Moreover, Raf1 directly competes with Rin1 for binding to H-Ras in vitro. Unlike Raf1, however, the Rin1 protein resides primarily at the plasma membrane, where H-Ras is localized. These data are consistent with Rin1 functioning in mammalian cells as an effector or regulator of H-Ras.     

Preferential inhibition of the oncogenic form of RasH by mutations in the GAP binding/"effector" domain

The double mutation, D33H/P34S, reduced the transforming activity of oncogenic RasH proteins, G12V and Q61L, 400- and 20-fold, respectively. Remarkably, this same mutation did not reduce the transforming activity of normal RasH, nor did it impair the ability of the protein to restore a functional Ras pathway in cells whose endogenous Ras proteins were inhibited. Another mutation in this region, D38N, had similar effects. The mutations reduced downstream coupling efficiency of normal Ras as assessed by yeast adenylyl cyclase stimulation. However, this was offset by decreased GTPase activating protein (GAP) binding, since the latter resulted in elevated GTP-bound mutant Ras in cells. The mutations produced a similar decrease in downstream coupling efficiency of oncogenic Ras, but decreased GAP binding did not compensate because the GTPase activity of oncogenic Ras is not stimulated by GAP. These results imply that preferential inactivation of oncogenic Ras in human tumors may be achieved by reagents designed to inhibit the GAP-binding/"effector" domain of Ras proteins.     

trans-Dominant suppressor mutations of the H-ras oncogene

Site-directed mutagenesis of the conserved sequence motifs of p21 generated a group of mutant p21s defective in GTP binding. Some of these mutants were highly transforming, whereas others were transformation defective. Among the latter group, we found two mutants, derived from the v-H-ras oncogene by substituting the asparagine-116 with tyrosine and isoleucine, that exhibited a trans-dominant activity of suppressing the transformed phenotype of NIH3T3 cells induced by a long terminal repeat-linked c-H-ras and a wild-type v-H-ras. They caused reduction of the colony-forming efficiency in soft agar (78% in c-ras-transformed cells; 55% in v-ras cells) and morphological reversion of ras transformants. Subclones of revertants expressed a great excess of mutant p21 relative to the c-ras p21 present in these cells. These mutants were not lethal to NIH3T3 cells. Apparently, defective proteins encoded by suppressor mutants sequestered vital targets for ras function. Suppressor mutants also induced morphological reversion of NIH3T3 cells transformed by src, fes/flp, sis, and fms oncogenes, suggesting that these oncogenes function upstream to ras in the signaling pathways. Cells transformed by mos and a chemical carcinogen were unaffected.     

Galectin-1 augments Ras activation and diverts Ras signals to Raf-1 at the expense of phosphoinositide 3-kinase

Ras proteins activate diverse effector molecules. Depending on the cellular context, Ras activation may have different biological consequences: induction of cell proliferation, senescence, survival, or death. Augmentation and selective activation of particular effector molecules may underlie various Ras actions. In fact, Ras effector-loop mutants interacting with distinctive effectors provide evidence for such selectivity. Interactions of active Ras with escort proteins, such as galectin-1, could also direct Ras selectivity. Here we show that in comparison with Ras transfectants, H-Ras/galectin-1 or K-Ras4B/galectin-1 co-transfectants exhibit enhanced and prolonged epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated increases in Ras-GTP, Raf-1 activity, and active extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Galectin-1 antisense RNA inhibited these EGF responses. Conversely, Ras and galectin-1 co-transfection inhibited the EGF-stimulated increase in phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) activity. Galectin-1 transfection also inhibited Ras(G12V)-induced PI3K but not Raf-1 activity. Galectin-1 co-immunoprecipitated with Ras(G12V) or with Ras(G12V/T35S) that activate Raf-1 but not with Ras(G12V/Y40C) that activates PI3K. Thus, galectin-1 binds active Ras and diverts its signal to Raf-1 at the expense of PI3K. This demonstrates a novel mechanism controlling the duration and selectivity of the Ras signal. Ras gains selectivity when it is associated with galectin-1, mimicking the selectivity of Ras(T35S), which activates Raf-1 but not PI3K.     

Critical binding and regulatory interactions between Ras and Raf occur through a small, stable N-terminal domain of Raf and specific Ras effector residues.

Genetic and biochemical evidence suggests that the Ras protooncogene product regulates the activation of the Raf kinase pathway, leading to the proposal that Raf is a direct mitogenic effector of activated Ras. Here we report the use of a novel competition assay to measure in vitro the relative affinity of the c-Raf-1 regulatory region for Ras-GTP, Ras-GDP, and 10 oncogenic and effector mutant Ras proteins. c-Raf-1 associates with normal Ras and the oncogenic V12 and L61 forms of Ras with equal affinity. The moderately transforming mutant Ras[E30K31] also bound to the c-Raf-1 regulatory region with normal affinity. Transformation-defective Ras effector mutants Ras[N33], Ras[S35], and Ras[N38] bound poorly. In contrast, the transformation defective Ras[G26I27] and Ras[E45] mutants bound to the c-Raf-1 regulatory region with nearly wild-type affinity. A stable, high-affinity Ras-binding region of c-Raf-1 was mapped to a 99-amino-acid subfragment of the first 257 residues. The smallest Ras-binding region identified consisted of N-terminal residues 51 to 131, although stable expression of the domain and high-affinity binding were improved by the presence of residues 132 to 149. Deletion of the Raf zinc finger region did not reduce Ras-binding affinity, while removal of the first 50 amino acids greatly increased affinity. Phosphorylation of Raf[1-149] by protein kinase A on serine 43 resulted in significant inhibiton of Ras binding. demonstrating that the mechanism of cyclic AMP downregulation results through structural changes occurring exclusively in this small Ras-binding domain.     

Ras-induced activation of Raf-1 is dependent on tyrosine phosphorylation.

Although Rafs play a central role in signal transduction, the mechanism(s) by which they become activated is poorly understood. Raf-1 activation is dependent on the protein's ability to bind Ras, but Ras binding is insufficient to activate Raf-1 tyrosine phosphorylation to this Ras-induced activation, in the absence of an over-expressed tyrosine kinase. We demonstrate that Raf-1 purified form Sf9 cells coinfected with baculovirus Ras but not Src could be inactivated by protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP-1B. 14-3-3 and Hsp90 proteins blocked both the tyrosine dephosphorylation and inactivation of Raf-1, suggesting that Raf-1 activity is phosphotyrosine dependent. In Ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells, a minority of Raf-1 protein was membrane associated, but essentially all Raf-1 activity and Raf-1 phosphotyrosine fractionated with plasma membranes. Thus, the tyrosine-phosphorylated and active pool of Raf-1 constitute a membrane-localized subfraction which could also be inactivated with PTP-1B. By contrast, B-Raf has aspartic acid residues at positions homologous to those of the phosphorylated tyrosines (at 340 and 341) of Raf-1 and displays a high basal level of activity. B-Raf was not detectably tyrosine phosphorylated, membrane localized, or further activated upon Ras transformation, even though B-Raf has been shown to bind to Ras in vitro. We conclude that tyrosine phosphorylation is an essential component of the mechanism by which Ras activates Raf-1 kinase activity and that steady-state activated Ras is insufficient to activate B-Raf in vivo.     

Phosphorylation of Raf-1 serine 338-serine 339 is an essential regulatory event for Ras-dependent activation and biological signaling.

Activation of the Raf serine/threonine protein kinases is tightly regulated by multiple phosphorylation events. Phosphorylation of either tyrosine 340 or 341 in the catalytic domain of Raf-1 has been previously shown to induce the ability of the protein kinase to phosphorylate MEK. By using a combination of mitogenic and enzymatic assays, we found that phosphorylation of the adjacent residue, serine 338, and, to a lesser extent, serine 339 is essential for the biological and enzymatic activities of Raf-1. Replacement of S338 with alanine blocked the ability of prenylated Raf-CX to transform Rat-1 fibroblasts. Similarly, the loss of S338-S339 in Raf-1 prevented protein kinase activation in COS-7 cells by either oncogenic Ras[V12] or v-Src. Consistent with phosphorylation of S338-S339, acidic amino acid substitutions of these residues partially restored transforming activity to Raf-CX, as well as kinase activation of Raf-1 by Ras[V12] or v-Src. Two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping of wild-type Raf-CX and Raf-CX[A338A339] confirmed the presence of a phosphoserine-containing peptide with the predicted mobility in the wild-type protein which was absent from the mutant. This peptide could be quantitatively precipitated by an antipeptide antibody specific for the 18-residue tryptic peptide containing S338-S339 and was demonstrated to contain only phosphoserine. Phosphorylation of this peptide in Raf-1 was significantly increased by coexpression with Ras[V12]. These data demonstrate that Raf-1 residues 338 to 341 constitute a unique phosphoregulatory site in which the phosphorylation of serine and tyrosine residues contributes to the regulation of Raf by Ras, Src, and Ras-independent membrane localization.     

Mechanism of inhibition of Raf-1 by protein kinase A.

The cytoplasmic Raf-1 kinase is essential for mitogenic signalling by growth factors, which couple to tyrosine kinases, and by tumor-promoting phorbol esters such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, which activate protein kinase C (PKC). Signalling by the Raf-1 kinase can be blocked by activation of the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent protein kinase A (PKA). The molecular mechanism of this inhibition is not precisely known but has been suggested to involve attenuation of Raf-1 binding to Ras. Using purified proteins, we show that in addition to weakening the interaction of Raf-1 with Ras, PKA can inhibit Raf-1 function directly via phosphorylation of the Raf-1 kinase domain. Phosphorylation by PKA interferes with the activation of Raf-1 by either PKC alpha or the tyrosine kinase Lck and even can downregulate the kinase activity of Raf-1 previously activated by PKC alpha or amino-terminal truncation. This type of inhibition can be dissociated from the ability of Raf-1 to associate with Ras, since (i) the isolated Raf-1 kinase domain, which lacks the Ras binding domain, is still susceptible to inhibition by PKA, (ii) phosphorylation of Raf-1 by PKC alpha alleviates the PKA-induced reduction of Ras binding but does not prevent the downregulation of Raf-1 kinase activity by PKA and (iii) cAMP agonists antagonize transformation by v-Raf, which is Ras independent.     

14-3-3 is not essential for Raf-1 function: identification of Raf-1 proteins that are biologically activated in a 14-3-3- and Ras-independent manner.

Recent reports have demonstrated the in vivo association of Raf-1 with members of the 14-3-3 protein family. To address the significance of the Raf-1-14-3-3 interaction, we investigated the enzymatic activity and biological function of Raf-1 in the presence and absence of associated 14-3-3. The interaction between these two molecules was disrupted in vivo and in vitro with a combination of molecular and biochemical techniques. Biochemical studies demonstrated that the enzymatic activities of Raf-1 were equivalent in the presence and absence of 14-3-3. Furthermore, mixing of purified Raf-1 and 14-3-3 in vitro was not sufficient to activate Raf-1. With a molecular approach, Cys-165 and Cys-168 as well as Ser-259 were identified as residues of Raf-1 required for the interaction with 14-3-3. Cys-165 and Cys-168 are located within the conserved cysteine-rich region of the CR1 domain, and Ser-259 is a conserved site of serine phosphorylation found within the CR2 domain. Mutation of either Cys-165 and Cys-168 or Ser-259 prevented the stable interaction of Raf-1 with 14-3-3 in vivo. Consistent with the model in which a site of serine phosphorylation is involved in the Raf-1-14-3-3 interaction, dephosphorylated Raf-1 was unable to associate with 14-3-3 in vitro. Phosphorylation may represent a general mechanism mediating 14-3-3 binding, because dephosphorylation of the Bcr kinase (known to interact with 14-3-3) also eliminated its association with 14-3-3. Finally, mutant Raf-1 proteins unable to stably interact with 14-3-3 exhibited enhanced enzymatic activity in human 293 cells and Xenopus oocytes and were biologically activated, as demonstrated by their ability to induced meiotic maturation of Xenopus oocytes. However, in contrast to wild-type Raf-1, activation of these mutants was independent of Ras. Our results therefore indicate that interaction with 14-3-3 is not essential for Raf-1 function.     

Role of MLK3-mediated activation of p70 S6 kinase in Rac1 transformation.

The signaling pathways that mediate the transforming activity of the Rac1 GTPase remain to be determined. In the present study, we used effector domain mutants of the constitutively activated Rac(61L) mutant that display differential transforming activities and differential activation of downstream effector pathways to investigate the contribution of p70 S6 kinase (p70(S6K)) to Rac1 transformation and to decipher the signaling pathways leading from Rac1 to p70(S6K). First, we found that Rac1 transforming activity could be dissociated from Rac1 activation of p70(S6K). A weakly transforming Rac1 mutant retained the ability to activate p70(S6K), whereas some potently transforming effector mutants were impaired in their ability to activate p70(S6K). These data suggest that p70(S6K) is not necessary to promote full Rac1 transforming activity. We also found a strong correlation between the ability of the Rac(61L) effector mutants to activate p70(S6K) and their ability to activate the JNK mitogen-activated protein kinase. We found that the MLK3 serine/threonine kinase activated JNK and p70(S6K), whereas activation of p70(S6K) by Rac(61L) was significantly inhibited by dominant-negative MLK3. Additionally, the ability of the Rac(61L) effector mutants to activate MLK3 correlated well with their ability to activate p70(S6K) and JNK. Taken together, these results provide evidence that Rac1 coordinately activates p70(S6K) and JNK via MLK3 activation. Finally, we found that co-expression of wild type, but not kinase-dead, MLK3 significantly inhibited Rac1 transforming activity. These results suggest that MLK3 may be a negative regulator of the growth-promoting and transforming properties of Rac1.