Composite structure of the chloroplast 23 S ribosomal RNA genes of Chlamydomonas reinhardii: Evolutionary and functional implications

The chloroplast ribosomal unit of Chlamydomonas reinhardii displays two features which are not shared by other chloroplast ribosomal units. These include the presence of an intron in the 23 S ribosomal RNA gene and of two small genes coding for 3 S and 7 S rRNA in the spacer between the 16 S and 23 S rRNA genes (Rochaix & Malnoë, 1978). Sequencing of the 7 S and 3 S rRNAs as well as their genes and neighbouring regions has shown that: (1) the 7 S and 3 S rRNA genes are 282 and 47 base-pairs long, respectively, and are separated by a 23 base-pair A + T-rich spacer. (2) A sequence microheterogeneity exists within the 3 S RNA genes. (3) The sequences of the 7 S and 3 S rRNAs are homologous to the 5′ termini of prokaryotic and other chloroplast 23 S rRNAs, indicating that the C. reinhardii counterparts of 23 S rRNA have a composite structure. (4) The sequences of the 7 S and 3 S rRNAs are related to that of cytoplasmic 5.8 S rRNA, suggesting that these RNAs may perform similar functions in the ribosome. (5) Partial nucleotide sequence complementarity is observed between the 5′ ends of the 7 S and 3 S RNAs on one hand and the 23 S rRNA sequences which flank the ribosomal intron on the other. These data are compatible with the idea that these small rRNAs may play a role in the processing of the 23 S rRNA precursor.     

Characterization of a separate small domain derived from the 5' end of 23S rRNA of an alpha-proteobacterium.

We demonstrate the presence of a separate processed domain derived from the 5' end of 23S rRNA in ribosomes of Rhodopseudomonas palustris, a member of the alpha-++proteobacteria. Previous sequencing studies predicted intervening sequences (IVS) at homologous positions within the 23S rRNA genes of several alpha-proteobacteria, including R.palustris, and we find a processed 23S rRNA 5' domain in unfractionated RNA from several species. 5.8S rRNA from eukaryotic cytoplasmic large subunit ribosomes and the bacterial processed 23S rRNA 5' domain share homology, possess similar structures and are both derived by processing of large precursors. However, the internal transcribed spacer regions or IVSs separating them from the main large subunit rRNAs are evolutionarily unrelated. Consistent with the difference in sequence, we find that the site and mechanism of IVS processing also differs. Rhodopseudomonas palustris IVS-containing RNA precursors are cleaved in vitro by Escherichia coli RNase III or a similar activity present in R.palustris extracts at a processing site distinct from that found in eukaryotic systems and this results in only partial processing of the IVS. Surprisingly, in a reaction unlike characterized cases of eubacterial IVS processing, an RNA segment larger than the corresponding DNA insertion is removed which contains conserved sequences. These sequences, by analogy, serve to link the 23S rRNA 5' rRNA domains or 5.8S rRNAs to the main portion of other prokaryotic 23S rRNAs or to eukaryotic 28S rRNAs, respectively.     

Intermolecular base-paired interaction between complementary sequences present near the 3'' ends of 5S rRNA and 18S (16S) rRNA might be involved in the reversible association of ribosomal subunits.

Highly conserved sequences present at an identical position near the 3' ends of eukaryotic and prokaryotic 5S rRNAs are complementary to the 5' strand of the m2(6)A hairpin structure near the 3' ends of 18S rRNA and 16S rRNA, respectively. The extent of base-pairing and the calculated stabilities of the hybrids that can be constructed between 5S rRNAs and the small ribosomal subunit RNAs are greater than most, if not all, RNA-RNA interactions that have been implicated in protein synthesis. The existence of complementary sequences in 5S rRNA and small ribosomal subunit RNA, along with the previous observation that there is very efficient and selective hybridization in vitro between 5S and 18S rRNA, suggests that base-pairing between 5S rRNA in the large ribosomal subunit and 18S (16S) rRNA in the small ribosomal subunit might be involved in the reversible association of ribosomal subunits. Structural and functional evidence supporting this hypothesis is discussed.     

Structure, expression and products of the ribosomal RNA operons of Rhodopseudomonas palustris No. 7

Rhodopseudomonas palustris strains carry one or two ribosomal rRNA operons, and those with duplicated rrn operons grow faster. The two rrn operons in R. palustris No. 7 are virtually identical over a 54,70-bp stretch containing the genes for 16S rRNA, tRNAile, tRNAala, 23S rRNA and 5S rRNA, as well as the intergenic spacers and part of the extragenic spacer. In R. palustris, unlike most bacteria with multiple rrn operons, the putative promoter sequences of the two operons are highly diverged, suggesting possible functional differentiation. By simultaneous primer-extension analysis of both pre-rRNAs, we detected a two-fold higher level of expression from rrnA under photoautotrophic conditions. Alteration of the conditions of growth leads to changes in the relative levels of expression of the two operons. Within the 5,470-bp segment, only two sequence differences are found between the 23S rRNA genes; one is at the center of the 23S rRNA molecule and affects a site of unknown function, and the other is within or immediately adjacent to sequences involved in processing of the 5' 23S rRNA IVS. In vitro processing of 5' IVS-containing 23S rRNA precursors from each operon does not reveal any detectable difference between them. The 5' ends of the mature 16S, 23S, and 5S rRNAs were determined by primer-extension analysis, and the 3' end of 23S rRNA was determined by RNA linker ligation-mediated cDNA cloning. The 5' and 3' ends of the R. palustris 23S rRNA molecule are extensively processed, suggesting that, unlike the situation in the established eubacterial model, these ends cannot basepair.     

Prediction of secondary structures of 16S and 23S rRNA fromEscherichia coli

Small and large subunits ofEscherichia coli ribosome have three different rRNAs, the sequences of which are known. However, attempts by three groups to predict secondary structures of 16S and 23S rRNAs have certain common limitations namely, these structures are predicted assuming no interactions among various domains of the molecule and only 40% residues are involved in base pairing as against the experimental observation of 60 % residues in base paired state. Recent experimental studies have shown that there is a specific interaction between naked 16S and 23S rRNA molecules. This is significant because we have observed that the regions (oligonucleotides of length 9–10 residues), in 16S rRNA which are complementary to those in 23S rRNA do not have internal complementary sequences. Therefore, we have developed a simple graph theoretical approach to predict secondary structures of 16S and 23S rRNAs. Our method for model building not only uses complete sequence of 16S or 23S rRNA molecule along with other experimental observations but also takes into account the observation that specific recognition is possible through the complementary sequences between 16S and 23S rRNA molecules and, therefore, these parts of the molecules are not used for internal base pairing. The method used to predict secondary structures is discussed. A typical secondary structure of the complex between 16S and 23S rRNA molecules, obtained using our method, is presented and compared Briefly with earlier model Building studies.     

Divergent mechanisms of 5' 23S rRNA IVS processing in the alpha-proteobacteria

Widespread occurrence of a separate small RNA derived from the 5'-end of 23S rRNA and of an intervening sequence (IVS) which separates this domain from the main segment of 23S rRNA in the alpha-proteobacteria implies that processing reactions which act to excise the IVS are also maintained in this group. We previously characterized the first example of processing of this IVS in Rhodopseudomonas palustris, which is classified with the Bradyrhizobia In this case, IVS excision occurs by a multistep process and RNase III appears to act at an early step. Here, we characterize in vivo and in vitro IVS processing in two other related, but phenotypically distinct, Bradyrhizobia We also examine in vivo and in vitro processing of rRNA precursors from a more distantly related alpha-proteobacterium, Rhodobacter sphaeroides which produces a separate 5' 23S rRNA domain but has different sequences in the 5' 23S rRNA IVS. The details of the in vivo processing of all of the Bradyrhizobial rRNAs closely resemble the R. palustris example and in vitro studies suggest that all of the Bradyrhizobia utilize RNase III in the first step of IVS cleavage. Remarkably, in vivo and in vitro studies with R.sphaeroides indicate that initial IVS cleavage uses a different mechanism. While the mechanism of IVS cleavage differs among these alpha-proteobacteria, in all of these cases the limits of the internal segments processed in vivo are almost identical and occur far beyond the initial cleavage sites within the IVSs. We propose that these bacteria possess common secondary maturation pathways which enable them to generate similarly processed 23S rRNA 5'- and 3'-ends.