GroEL/GroES chaperone and Lon protease regulate expression of the Vibrio fischeri lux operon in Escherichia coli

Chaperone GroEL/GroES and Lon protease were shown to play a role in regulating the expression of the Vibrio fischeri lux operon cloned in Escherichia coli cells. The E. coli groE mutant carrying a plasmid with the full-length V. fischeri lux regulon showed a decreased bioluminescence. The bioluminescence intensity was high in E. coli cells with mutant lonA and the same plasmid. Bioluminescence induction curves lacked the lag period characteristic of lon ⁺ strains. Regulatory luxR of V. fischeri was cloned in pGEX-KG to produce the hybrid gene GST-luxR. The product of its expression, GST-LuxR, was isolated together with GroEL and Lon upon affinity chromatography on a column with glutathione-agarose, suggesting complexation of LuxR with these proteins. It was assumed that GroEL/GroES is involved in LuxR folding, while Lon protease degrades LuxR before its folding into an active globule or after denaturation.     

Robust and sensitive control of a quorum‐sensing circuit by two interlocked feedback loops

The quorum‐sensing (QS) response of Vibrio fischeri involves a rapid switch between low and high induction states of the lux operon over a narrow concentration range of the autoinducer (AI) 3‐oxo‐hexanoyl‐L ‐homoserine lactone. In this system, LuxR is an AI‐dependent positive regulator of the lux operon, which encodes the AI synthase. This creates a positive feedback loop common in many bacterial species that exhibit QS‐controlled gene expression. Applying a combination of modeling and experimental analyses, we provide evidence for a LuxR autoregulatory feedback loop that allows LuxR to increase its concentration in the cell during the switch to full lux activation. Using synthetic lux gene fragments, with or without the AI synthase gene, we show that the buildup of LuxR provides more sensitivity to increasing AI, and promotes the induction process. Elevated LuxR levels buffer against spurious variations in AI levels ensuring a robust response that endows the system with enhanced hysteresis. LuxR autoregulation also allows for two distinct responses within the same cell population.     

GroESL proteins facilitate binding of externally added inducer by luxR protein-containing E. coli cells

htpR^? (rpoH, σ32 minus) strain of E. coli harbouring the whole lux system of Vibrio fischeri is very dim. We have recently shown that GroESL proteins fully recover the expression of the lux system in this strain. This work has been undertaken to study our assumption that the GroESL proteins stabilize the LuxR protein, thus enhancing the formation of LuxR–Inducer complex. E. coli htpR^? cells harbouring the luxR gene were unable to bind extracellularly added inducer, while late logarithmically growing htpR⁺ strain bound small quantities of the inducer. Reduction in the nutrient content of the growth medium resulted in a large increase in the capability of these cells to bind the inducer. htpR⁺ or htpR^? E. coli strains harbouring both the luxR and the groESL genes bound large quantities of the inducer. The molecular and ecological significance of these results is discussed.     

Synthesis and evaluation of thiazolidinedione and dioxazaborocane analogues as inhibitors of AI-2 quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi

Two focused libraries based on two types of compounds, that is, thiazolidinediones and dioxazaborocanes were designed. Structural resemblances can be found between thiazolidinediones and well-known furanone type quorum sensing (QS) inhibitors such as N-acylaminofuranones, and/or acyl-homoserine lactone signaling molecules, while dioxazaborocanes structurally resemble previously reported oxazaborolidine derivatives which antagonized autoinducer 2 (AI-2) binding to its receptor. Because of this, we hypothesized that these compounds could affect AI-2 QS in Vibrio harveyi. Although all compounds blocked QS, the thiazolidinediones were the most active AI-2 QS inhibitors, with EC₅₀ values in the low micromolar range. Their mechanism of inhibition was elucidated by measuring the effect on bioluminescence in a series of V. harveyi QS mutants and by DNA-binding assays with purified LuxR protein. The active compounds neither affected bioluminescence as such nor the production of AI-2. Instead, our results indicate that the thiazolidinediones blocked AI-2 QS in V. harveyi by decreasing the DNA-binding ability of LuxR. In addition, several dioxazaborocanes were found to block AI-2 QS by targeting LuxPQ.     

Heterogeneity of the populations of marine luminescent bacteria Photobacterium leiognathi under different conditions of cultivation

Manifestation of pleiotropic effects in the isogenic variants of the luminescent bacterium Photobacterium leiognathi 54 was investigated. The decrease or increase of the expression level of bioluminescence was caused by changes in lux operon regulation. The dynamics of the bioluminescence of dark and dim variants did not differ from the dynamics of the initial luminescent variant, but dependence of the level of luminescence intensity on the exogenous autoinducer of the lux operon was revealed. The investigated variants of P. leiognathi 54 inherited fairly stable morphological characteristics, colony architectonics, level of luminescence, and activity of some enzymes; variants with reduced bioluminescence formed colonies of the S type. Stable bright variants with S-and R-type colonies appeared both in the initial strain population and in the dark variant population, but with smaller frequency. Populations of the bright variant with R-type colonies were most heterogeneous; this can be determined by the lack of glucose repression of the bioluminescence in contrast to other investigated inherited variants of P. leiognathi.     

The Effects of Regulatory Proteins RcsA and RcsB on the Expression of the Vibrio fischeri lux Operon in Escherichia coli

A study was made of the effect of RcsA and RcsB on the Vibrio fischeri lux expression in Escherichia coli. RcsA suppressed the LuxR activity and thereby inhibited expression of the lux genes coding for luciferase and reductase. In osmotic shock, RcsA–RcsB activated lux expression and, consequently, the bioluminescence of E. coli cells in the early log phase.