Conformational, receptor interaction and alanine scan studies of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an insulinotropic incretin hormone that stimulates insulin secretion during a meal. GIP has glucose lowering abilities and hence is considered as a potential target molecule for type 2 diabetes therapy. In this article, we present the solution structure of GIP in membrane-mimicking environments by proton NMR spectroscopy and molecular modelling. GIP adopts an α-helical conformation between residues Phe(6)-Gly(31) and Ala(13)-Gln(29) for micellar and bicellar media, respectively. Previously we examined the effect of N-terminal Ala substitution in GIP, but here eight GIP analogues were synthesised by replacing individual residues within the central 8-18 region with alanine. These studies showed relatively minor changes in biological activity as assessed by insulin releasing potency. However, at higher concentration, GIP(Ala(16)), and GIP(Ala(18)) showed insulin secreting activity higher than the native GIP (P<0.01 to P<0.001) in cultured pancreatic BRIN-BD11 cells. Receptor interaction studies of the native GIP with the extracellular domain of its receptor were performed by using two different docking algorithms. At the optimised docking conformation, the complex was stabilised by the presence of hydrophobic interactions and intermolecular hydrogen bonding. Further, we have identified some potentially important additional C-terminal interactions of GIP with its N-terminal extracellular receptor domain.     

GIP-(3-42) does not antagonize insulinotropic effects of GIP at physiological concentrations

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP-(1-42)] is degraded by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV), forming GIP-(3-42). In mice, high concentrations of synthetic GIP-(3-42) may function as a GIP receptor antagonist, but it is unclear whether this occurs at physiological concentrations. In COS-7 cells transiently transfected with the human GIP receptor, GIP-(1-42) and -(3-42) bind with affinities (IC(50)) of 5.2 and 22 nM, respectively. GIP-(1-42) was a potent agonist, stimulating cAMP accumulation (EC(50), 13.5 pM); GIP-(3-42) alone had no effect. When incubated together with native GIP, GIP-(3-42) behaved as a weak antagonist (IC(50), 92 and 731 nM for inhibition of cAMP accumulation elicited by 10 pM and 1 nM native GIP, respectively). In the isolated perfused rat pancreas, GIP-(3-42) alone had no effect on insulin output and only reduced the response to GIP (1 nM) when coinfused in >50-fold molar excess (IC(50), 138 nM). The ability of GIP-(3-42) to affect the antihyperglycemic or insulinotropic actions of GIP-(1-42) was examined in chloralose-anesthetized pigs given intravenous glucose. Endogenous DPP IV activity was inhibited to reduce degradation of the infused GIP-(1-42), which was infused alone and together with GIP-(3-42), at rates sufficient to mimic postprandial concentrations of each peptide. Glucose, insulin, and glucagon responses were identical irrespective of whether GIP-(1-42) was infused alone or together with GIP-(3-42). We conclude that, although GIP-(3-42) can weakly antagonize cAMP accumulation and insulin output in vitro, it does not behave as a physiological antagonist in vivo.     

Understanding interactions of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) with its G-protein coupled receptor through NMR and molecular modeling.

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP, or glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) is a 42-amino acid incretin hormone moderating glucose-induced insulin secretion. Antidiabetic therapy based on GIP holds great promise because of the fact that its insulinotropic action is highly dependent on the level of glucose, overcoming the sideeffects of hypoglycemia associated with the current therapy of Type 2 diabetes. The truncated peptide, GIP(1-30)NH2, has the same activity as the full length native peptide. We have studied the structure of GIP(1-30)NH2 and built a model of its G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). The structure of GIP(1-30)NH2 in DMSO-d6 and H2O has been studied using 2D NMR (total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY), nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY), double quantum filtered-COSY (DQF-COSY), 13C-heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) experiments, and its conformation built by MD simulations with the NMR data as constraints. The peptide in DMSO-d6 exhibits an alpha-helix between residues Ile12 and Lys30 with a discontinuity at residues Gln19 and Gln20. In H2O, the alpha-helix starts at Ile7, breaks off at Gln19, and then continues right through to Lys30. GIP(1-30)NH2 has all the structural features of peptides belonging to family B1 GPCRs, which are characterized by a coil at the N-terminal and a long C-terminal alpha-helix with or without a break. A model of the seven transmembrane (TM) helices of the GIP receptor (GIPR) has been built on the principles of comparative protein modeling, using the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin as a template. The N-terminal domain of GIPR has been constructed from the NMR structure of the N-terminal of corticoptropin releasing factor receptor (CRFR), a family B1 GCPR. The intra and extra cellular loops and the C-terminal have been modeled from fragments retrieved from the PDB. On the basis of the experimental data available for some members of family B1 GPCRs, four pairs of constraints between GIP(1-30)NH2 and its receptor were used in the FTDOCK program, to build the complete model of the GIP(1-30)NH2:GIPR complex. The model can rationalize the various experimental observations including the potency of the truncated GIP peptide. This work is the first complete model at the atomic level of GIP(1-30)NH2 and of the complex with its GPCR.     

In depth analysis of the N-terminal bioactive domain of gastric inhibitory polypeptide

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an important gastrointestinal regulator of insulin release and glucose homeostasis following a meal. Strategies have been undertaken to delineate the bioactive domains of GIP with the intention of developing small molecular weight GIP mimetics. The molecular cloning of receptors for GIP and the related hormone GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) has allowed examination of the characteristics of incretin analogs in transfected cell models. The current report examines the N-terminal bioactive domain of GIP residing in residues 1-14 by alanine scanning mutagenesis and N-terminal substitution/modification. Further studies examined peptide chimeras of GIP and GLP-1 designed to localize bioactive determinants of the two hormones. The alanine scan of the GIP(1-14) sequence established that the peptide was extremely sensitive to structural perturbations. Only replacement of amino acids 2 and 13 with those found in glucagon failed to dramatically reduce receptor binding and activation. Of four GIP(1-14) peptides modified by the introduction of DP IV-resistant groups, a peptide with a reduced bond between Ala2 and Glu3 demonstrated improved receptor potency compared to native GIP(1-14). The peptide chimera studies supported recent results on the importance of a mid-region helix for bioactivity of GIP, and confirmed existence of two separable regions with independent intrinsic receptor binding and activation properties. Furthermore, peptide chimeras showed that binding of GLP-1 also involves both N- and C-terminal domains, but that it apparently contains only a single bioactive domain in its N-terminus. Together, these results should facilitate development of incretin based therapies using rational drug design for potential treatment of diabetes.     

Caspase-12 cleavage and increased oxidative stress during motoneuron degeneration in transgenic mouse model of ALS

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide is an incretin hormone that stimulates insulin secretion and reduces postprandial glycaemic excursions. The glucose-dependent action of GIP on pancreatic beta-cells has attracted attention towards its exploitation as a potential drug for type 2 diabetes. Use of NMR or X-ray crystallography is vital to determine the three-dimensional structure of the peptide. Therefore, to understand the basic structural requirements for the biological activity of GIP, the solution structure of the major biologically active fragment, GIP(1-30)amide, was investigated by proton NMR spectroscopy and molecular modelling. The structure is characterised by a full length alpha-helical conformation between residues F(6) and A(28). This structural information could play an important role in the design of therapeutic agents based upon GIP receptor agonists.     

The bioactive conformation of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide by NMR and CD spectroscopy

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a gastrointestinal incretin hormone, which modulates physiological insulin secretion. Because of its glucose-sensitive insulinotropic activity, there has been a considerable interest in utilizing the hormone as a potential treatment for type 2 diabetes. Structural parameters obtained from NMR spectroscopy combined with molecular modeling techniques play a vital role in the design of new therapeutic drugs. Therefore, to understand the structural requirements for the biological activity of GIP, the solution structure of GIP was investigated by circular dichroism (CD) followed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. CD studies showed an increase in the helical character of the peptide with increasing concentration of trifluoroethanol (TFE) up to 50%. Therefore, the solution structure of GIP in 50% TFE was determined. It was found that there was an alpha-helix between residues 6 and 29, which tends to extend further up to residue 36. The implications of the C-terminal extended helical segment in the inhibitory properties of GIP on gastric acid secretion are discussed. It is shown that the adoption by GIP of an alpha-helical secondary structure is a requirement for its biological activity. Knowledge of the solution structure of GIP will help in the understanding of how the peptide interacts with its receptor and aids in the design of new therapeutic agents useful for the treatment of diabetes.     

Characterization and biological actions of N-terminal truncated forms of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide

The N-terminal domain of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) plays an important role in regulating biological activity. This study examined biological properties of several N-terminal truncated forms of GIP and two novel forms with substitutions at Phe position-6 with Arg or Val. GIP(6-42), GIP(R6-42), GIP(V6-42), GIP(7-42) and GIP(9-42) stimulated cAMP production in BRIN-BD11 cells similar to native GIP, whereas responses to GIP(3-42), GIP(4-42), GIP(5-42) and GIP(8-42) were reduced (P < 0.01 to P < 0.001). GIP-induced cyclic AMP production was significantly inhibited by GIP(3-42), GIP(4-42), GIP(5-42), GIP(6-42), GIP(R6-42), GIP(7-42) and GIP(8-42) (P < 0.001). Compared with native GIP, in vitro insulinotropic activity of GIP(3-42), GIP(4-42), GIP(5-42), GIP(7-42) and GIP(8-42) was reduced (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), with GIP(4-42), GIP(5-42), GIP(7-42) and GIP(8-42) also potently inhibiting GIP-stimulated insulin secretion (P < 0.001). In ob/ob mice, GIP(4-42) and GIP(8-42) increased (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01) plasma glucose concentrations compared to the glucose-lowering action of native GIP. When GIP(8-42) was co-administered with native GIP it countered the ability of the native peptide to lower plasma glucose and increase circulating insulin concentrations. These data confirm the importance of the N-terminal region of GIP in regulating bioactivity and reveal that sequential truncation of the peptide yields novel GIP receptor antagonists which may have functional significance.     

DPP IV resistance and insulin releasing activity of a novel di-substituted analogue of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, (Ser2-Asp13)GIP

Structure-function studies suggest that preservation of the N-terminus and secondary structure of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is important for biological activity. Therefore, a novel di-substituted analogue of GIP, (Ser(2)-Asp(13))GIP, containing a negatively charged Asp residue in place of an Ala in position 13, was synthesised and evaluated for in vitro biological activity. Incubation with dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) showed the half-lives of GIP and (Ser(2)-Asp(13))GIP to be 2.3 and >4h, respectively. Insulin releasing studies in clonal pancreatic BRIN-BD11 cells demonstrated that (Ser(2)-Asp(13))GIP (10(-12)to 10(-7)mol/l) was significantly less potent (60-90%; P<0.05 to P<0.001) than native GIP. The peptide failed to display antagonistic properties as it did not significantly alter insulin secretion when incubated in the presence of GIP (10(-7)mol/l). These results demonstrate that despite increased resistance to DPP IV, substituting Ala in position 13 with a negatively charged Asp, thus producing the di-substituted analogue (Ser(2)-Asp(13))GIP, significantly reduces biological activity, most likely due to modifications within the secondary structure.     

Mapping interactions of gastric inhibitory polypeptide with GIPR N‐terminus using NMR and molecular dynamics simulations

Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (gastric inhibitory polypeptide, or GIP), a 42‐amino acid incretin hormone, modulates insulin secretion in a glucose‐concentration‐dependent manner. Its insulinotropic action is highly dependent on glucose concentration that surmounts the hypoglycemia side effects associated with current therapy. In order to develop a GIP‐based anti‐diabetic therapy, it is essential to establish the 3D structure of the peptide and study its interaction with the GIP receptor (GIPR) in detail. This will give an insight into the GIP‐mediated insulin release process. In this article, we report the solution structure of GIP(1–42, human)NH₂ deduced by NMR and the interaction of the peptide with the N‐terminus of GIPR using molecular modelling methods. The structure of GIP(1–42, human)NH₂ in H₂O has been investigated using 2D‐NMR (DQF‐COSY, TOCSY, NOESY, ¹H‐¹³C HSQC) experiments, and its conformation was built by constrained MD simulations with the NMR data as constraints. The peptide in H₂O exhibits an α‐helical structure between residues Ser8 and Asn39 with some discontinuity at residues Gln29 to Asp35; the helix is bent at Gln29. This bent gives the peptide an ‘L’ shape that becomes more pronounced upon binding to the receptor. The interaction of GIP with the N‐terminus of GIPR was modelled by allowing GIP to interact with the N‐terminus of GIPR under a series of decreasing constraints in a molecular dynamics simulation, culminating with energy minimization without application of any constraints on the system. The canonical ensemble obtained from the simulation was subjected to a detailed energy analysis to identify the peptide–protein interaction patterns at the individual residue level. These interaction energies shed some light on the binding of GIP with the GIPR N‐terminus in a quantitative manner. Copyright © 2010 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Comparison of the insulinotropic activity of glucagon-superfamily peptides in rat pancreas perfusion.

Previous studies have demonstrated that glucagon-superfamily peptides stimulate insulin release from the pancreatic islets in a glucose dependent manner. In this study we have carried out a structure-activity study of their insulinotropic activity using a rat pancreas perfusion with 5.5 mM glucose concentration. The following peptides were examined: glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36)amide (tGLP-1), glucagon, gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), peptide having an amino-terminal histidine and carboxy-terminal isoleucine amide (PHI), vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), growth hormone releasing factor(1-29)amide (GRF), GRF(1-27)amide and synthetic hybrid-peptides of PHI-GRF, PHI(1-11)-GRF(12-27) and PHI(1-20)-GRF(21-27). Their potencies were evaluated as: tGLP-1 = GIP > glucagon > PHI = VIP > PHI(1-20)-GRF(21-27) > PHI(1-11)-GRF(12-27) > GRF(1-29) = GRF(1-27). It is clear that 0.1 nM tGLP-1 stimulated insulin release, whereas 1 microM GRF(1-29) did not. These results indicate that 1) in addition to N-terminal amino acid (histidine or tyrosine), position 4 (glycine), position 9 (aspartic acid) and position 11 (serine) in the amino acid sequence are important for their insulinotropic activity, 2) not only the N-terminal portion but also the C-terminal portion of these peptides contribute to their insulinotropic activity.     

Comparative effects of GLP-1 and GIP on cAMP production, insulin secretion, and in vivo antidiabetic actions following substitution of Ala8/Ala2 with 2-aminobutyric acid

The two major incretin hormones, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), are currently being considered as prospective drug candidates for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Interest in these gut hormones was initially spurred by their potent insulinotropic activities, but a number of other antihyperglycaemic actions are now established. One of the foremost barriers in progressing GLP-1 and GIP to the clinic concerns their rapid degradation and inactivation by the ubiquitous enzyme, dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV). Here, we compare the DPP IV resistance and biological properties of Abu8/Abu2 (2-aminobutyric acid) substituted analogues of GLP-1 and GIP engineered to impart DPP IV resistance. Whereas (Abu8)GLP-1 was completely stable to human plasma (half-life >12 h), GLP-1, GIP, and (Abu2)GIP were rapidly degraded (half-lives: 6.2, 6.0, and 7.1 h, respectively). Native GIP, GLP-1, and particularly (Abu8)GLP-1 elicited significant adenylate cyclase and insulinotropic activity, while (Abu2)GIP was less effective. Similarly, in obese diabetic (ob/ob) mice, GIP, GLP-1, and (Abu8)GLP-1 displayed substantial glucose-lowering and insulin-releasing activities, whereas (Abu2)GIP was only weakly active. These studies illustrate divergent effects of penultimate amino acid Ala8/Ala2 substitution with Abu on the biological properties of GLP-1 and GIP, suggesting that (Abu8)GLP-1 represents a potential candidate for future therapeutic development.     

Contribution of site-specific PEGylation to the dipeptidyl peptidase IV stability of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide

The effects of PEGylation of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) on potency and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) stability are reported. N-terminal modification of GIP(1-30) with 40 kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) abrogates functional activity. In contrast, C-terminal PEGylation of GIP(1-30) maintains full agonism and reasonable potency at the GIP receptor and confers a high level of DPPIV resistance. Moreover, the dual modification of N-terminal palmitoylation and C-terminal PEGylation results in a full agonist of comparable potency to native GIP that is stable to DPPIV cleavage. The results provide the basis for the development of long acting, PEGylated GIP, GIP variants, or GIP-based hybrid peptide therapeutics.     

Biological activity and antidiabetic potential of synthetic fragment peptides of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, GIP(1-16) and (Pro3)GIP(1-16)

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a key physiological insulin releasing peptide and potential antidiabetic agent. The present study was undertaken in an attempt to develop small molecular weight GIP agonist and antagonist molecules. The bioactivity of two modified C-terminally truncated fragment GIP peptides, GIP(1-16) and (Pro3)GIP(1-16), was examined in terms of insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis using BRIN-BD11 cells and type 2 diabetic mice. In vitro insulin release studies demonstrated that GIP(1-16) and (Pro3)GIP(1-16) possessed weak GIP-receptor agonist and antagonistic properties, respectively. Intraperitoneal administration of GIP(1-16) in combination with glucose to obese diabetic (ob/ob) mice did not effect the glycaemic excursion and had a marginal effect on insulin release. GIP(1-16) was substantially less effective than the native GIP(1-42). (Pro3)GIP(1-16) administration significantly curtailed (P < 0.05) the insulinotropic and glucose lowering effects of native GIP, but was significantly less effective than (Pro3)GIP. Based on the established concept of a therapeutic benefit of GIP receptor antagonism in obesity-diabetes, ob/ob mice received once daily injection of (Pro3)GIP(1-16) for 14 days. No significant effects were observed on food intake, body weight, HbA1c, glucose tolerance, metabolic response to feeding and either insulin secretion or insulin sensitivity following prolonged (Pro3)GIP(1-16) treatment. These data demonstrate that C-terminal truncation of GIP or (Pro3)GIP yields small molecular weight GIP molecules with significantly reduced biological activity that precludes therapeutic utility.     

Tyr1 and Ile7 of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) confer differential ligand selectivity toward GIP and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors

Glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are incretin hormones released in response to food intake and potentiate insulin secretion from pancreatic β cells through their distinct yet related G protein-coupled receptors, GLP1R and GIPR. While GLP-1 and GIP exhibit similarity in their N-terminal sequence and overall α-helical structure, GLP-1 does not bind to GIPR and vice versa. To determine which amino acid residues of these peptide ligands are responsible for specific interaction with their respective receptors, we generated mutant GIP in which several GLP-1-specific amino acid residues were substituted for the original amino acids. The potency of the mutant ligands was examined using HEK293 cells transfected with GLP1R or GIPR expression plasmids together with a cAMP-responsive element-driven luciferase (CRE-luc) reporter plasmid. A mutated GIP peptide in which Tyr¹, Ile⁷, Asp¹⁵, and His¹⁸ were replaced by His, Thr, Glu, and Ala, respectively, was able to activate both GLP1R and GIPR with moderate potency. Replacing the original Tyr¹ and/or Ile⁷ in the N-terminal moiety of this mutant peptide allowed full activation of GIPR but not of GLP1R. However, reintroducing Asp¹⁵ and/or His¹⁸ in the central α-helical region did not significantly alter the ligand potency. These results suggest that Tyr/His¹ and Ile/Thr⁷ of GIP/GLP-1 peptides confer differential ligand selectivity toward GIPR and GLP1R.     

Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 on insulin secretion

The insulinotropic actions of two forms of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) containing 31 and 37 amino acid residues on perfused rat pancreas were compared with that of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), hitherto the most potent intestinal insulinotropic polypeptide known. The smaller form, C-terminally amidated GLP-1-(7-36), strongly enhanced insulin secretion stimulated by 11.1 mM D-glucose at a concentration as low as 0.1 nM. Comparable effects of GIP and GLP-1-(1-37) on insulin secretion were observed at concentrations of 1.0 nM and 10.0 nM, respectively. At the doses tested, neither GLP-1s nor GIP had any effect on insulin secretion induced by 3.3 mM D-glucose. At a concentration of 1.0 nM, GLP-1-(7-36 amide) also enhanced insulin secretion induced by 5 mM L-arginine whereas at concentrations of up to 10.0 nM, GLP-1-(1-37) did not. The results show that the smaller form of GLP-1 is more strongly insulinotropic than GIP. These findings suggest that the smaller GLP-1 may have a physiologically more important role as a modulator of insulin release.     

Characterisation and biological activity of Glu3 amino acid substituted GIP receptor antagonists

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an important gastrointestinal hormone, which regulates insulin release and glucose homeostasis, but is rapidly inactivated by enzymatic N-terminal truncation. Here we report the enzyme resistance and biological activity of several Glu(3)-substituted analogues of GIP namely; (Ala(3))GIP, (Lys(3))GIP, (Phe(3))GIP, (Trp(3))GIP and (Tyr(3))GIP. Only (Lys(3))GIP demonstrated moderately enhanced resistance to DPP-IV (p<0.05 to p<0.01) compared to native GIP. All analogues demonstrated a decreased potency in cAMP production (EC(50) 1.47 to 11.02 nM; p<0.01 to p<0.001) with (Lys(3))GIP and (Phe(3))GIP significantly inhibiting GIP-stimulated cAMP production (p<0.05). In BRIN-BD11 cells, (Lys(3))GIP, (Phe(3))GIP, (Trp(3))GIP and (Tyr(3))GIP did not stimulate insulin secretion with both (Lys(3))GIP and (Phe(3))GIP significantly inhibiting GIP-stimulated insulin secretion (p<0.05). Injection of each GIP analogue together with glucose in ob/ob mice significantly increased the glycaemic excursion compared to control (p<0.05 to p<0.001). This was associated with lack of significant insulin responses. (Ala(3))GIP, (Phe(3))GIP and (Tyr(3))GIP, when administered together with GIP, significantly reduced plasma insulin (p<0.05 to p<0.01) and impaired the glucose-lowering ability (p<0.05 to p<0.01) of the native peptide. The DPP-IV resistance and GIP antagonism observed were similar but less pronounced than (Pro(3))GIP. These data demonstrate that position 3 amino acid substitution of GIP with (Ala(3)), (Phe(3)), (Tyr(3)) or (Pro(3)) provides a new class of functional GIP receptor antagonists.     

The isolation and sequencing of human gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP)

Human GIP 1-42 and fragments of human GIP corresponding to GIP 10-42, GIP 11-42, and GIP 17-42 were isolated from acid-ethanol extracts of human small intestines with the aid of an anti-GIP serum specific for the extreme C-terminal portion of the GIP molecule. The full sequence of human GIP has been established by Edman degradation of these peptides and fragments thereof by automatic gas-phase sequencing. Human GIP differs from porcine GIP at residues 18 and 34. The sequence of human GIP is thus: (Formula: see text) Amino acid residues 18 and 34 are Arg and Ser, respectively, in porcine GIP.     

Conformational and membrane interaction studies of the antimicrobial peptide alyteserin-1c and its analogue [E4K]alyteserin-1c

Alyteserin-1c (GLKEIFKAGLGSLVKGIAAHVAS.NH(2)), first isolated from skin secretions of the midwife toad Alytes obstetricans, shows selective growth-inhibitory activity against Gram-negative bacteria. The structures of alyteserin-1c and its more potent and less haemolytic analogue [E4K]alyteserin-1c were investigated in various solution and membrane mimicking environments by proton NMR spectroscopy and molecular modelling. In aqueous solution, the peptide displays a lack of secondary structure but, in a 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE-d(3))-H(2)O solvent mixture, the structure is characterised by an extended alpha helix between residues Leu(2) and Val(21). Solution structural studies in the membrane mimicking environments, sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), dodecylphosphocholine (DPC), and 1,2-dihexanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (DHPC) micelles, indicate that these peptides display an alpha helical structure between residues Lys(3) and Val(21). Positional studies of the peptides in SDS, DPC and DHPC media show that the N-terminal and central residues lie inside the micelle while C-terminal residues beyond Ala(19) do not interact with the micelles.     

Simultaneous determination of incretin hormones and their truncated forms from human plasma by immunoprecipitation and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

The incretins, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP(1-42)) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1(7-36)), are involved in regulation of gastric emptying, glucose homeostasis, body fat regulation and the glucose-induced insulin secretion from the endocrine pancreas. After release in the circulation both peptides are rapidly degraded by the exopeptidase dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DP IV) to the inactive polypeptides GIP(3-42) and GLP-1(9-36). In vivo stabilization of the active incretins by orally available DP IV-inhibitors is now widely accepted as a new therapeutic approach in antidiabetic treatment. In order to demonstrate the pharmacodynamic effect of DP IV-inhibitors, it is necessary to measure the plasma levels of active and inactive forms of GIP and GLP-1. We previously described an immunoprecipitation method as sample preparation and concentration in combination with a LC-MS analysis for determination of active and inactive GIP. We could improve the efficiency and suitability of this method by reduction of the necessary sample volume to 1.0 ml and simultaneous measurement of GIP(1-42), GIP(3-42) and GLP-1(7-36), GLP-1(9-36), without loss of sensitivity. An LOQ of approximately 5 and 11 pmol/l was maintained for GIP and GLP-1, respectively.