Estrogen and androgen elicit growth hormone release via dissimilar patterns of hypothalamic neuropeptide secretion

The dimorphic pattern of growth hormone (GH) secretion and somatic growth in male and female mammals is attributable to the gonadal steroids. Whether these hormones mediate their effects solely on hypothalamic neurons, on somatotropes or on both to evoke the gender-specific GH secretory patterns has not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of 17beta-estradiol, testosterone and its metabolites on release of GH, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SRIF) from bovine anterior pituitary cells and hypothalamic slices in an in vitro perifusion system. Physiological concentrations of testosterone and estradiol perifused directly to anterior pituitary cells did not affect GH releases; whereas, dihydrotestosterone and 5alpha-androstane-3alpha, 17beta-diol increased GH. Perifusion of testosterone at a pulsatile rate, and its metabolites and estradiol at a constant rate to hypothalamic slices in series with anterior pituitary cells increased GH release. The androgenic hormones increased GHRH and SRIF release from hypothalamus; whereas, estradiol increased GHRH but decreased SRIF release. Our data show that estradiol and the androgens generated distinctly different patterns of GHRH and SRIF release, which in turn established gender-specific GH patterns.     

Somatostatin decreases voltage-gated Ca2+ currents in GH3 cells through activation of somatostatin receptor 2

The secretion of growth hormone (GH) is inhibited by hypothalamic somatostatin (SRIF) in somatotropes through five subtypes of the somatostatin receptor (SSTR1-SSTR5). We aimed to characterize the subtype(s) of SSTRs involved in the Ca2+ current reduction in GH3 somatotrope cells using specific SSTR subtype agonists. We used nystatin-perforated patch clamp to record voltage-gated Ca2+ currents, using a holding potential of -80 mV in the presence of K+ and Na+ channel blockers. We first established the presence of T-, L-, N-, and P/Q-type Ca2+ currents in GH3 cells using a variety of channel blockers (Ni+, nifedipine, omega-conotoxin GVIA, and omega-agatoxin IVA). SRIF (200 nM) reduced L- and N-type but not T- or P/Q-type currents in GH3 cells. A range of concentrations of each specific SSTR agonist was tested on Ca2+ currents to find the maximal effective concentration. Activation of SSTR2 with 10(-7) and 10(-8) M L-797,976 decreased the voltage-gated Ca2+ current and abolished any further decrease by SRIF. SSTR1, SSTR3, SSTR4, and SSTR5 agonists at 10(-7) M did not modify the voltage-gated Ca2+ current and did not affect the Ca2+ current response to SRIF. These results indicate that SSTR2 is involved mainly in regulating voltage-gated Ca2+ currents by SRIF, which contributes to the decrease in intracellular Ca2+ concentration and GH secretion by SRIF.     

Muscarinic receptor activity change after prolonged treatment with growth hormone and somatostatin

1. The effect of 10-day treatment with growth hormone (GH) (1 mg/kg body weight day) and somatostatin (SRIF) (0.25 mg/kg body weight day) subcutaneously on the activity of muscarinic (M) receptors in rat hypothalamic, pituitary and cerebral cortical membrane fractions was studied using (3H)quinuclidinyl benzylate [(3H)QNB] as radioligand. 2. The administration of GH and SRIF significantly decreased the M-receptor binding affinity in the hypothalamus. 3. In the pituitary the M-receptor affinity was increased after both GH and SRIF treatment. 4. In the hypothalamus and the pituitary the binding capacity of muscarinic receptors was unchanged. 5. In the cerebral cortex the chronical GH injection induced an increase in the number of antagonist binding sites and a decrease of their affinity, while the similar SRIF treatment led to an increase of the binding affinity without any change of M-receptor capacity. 6. These results indicate that GH and SRIF selectively and region-specifically modulate muscarinic receptor binding affinity and capacity and provide new insight into the feedback regulatory mechanisms of GH secretion.     

A construct of interactive feedback control of the GH axis in the male

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is controlled by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), the GH release-inhibiting hormone somatostatin (SRIF), and autofeedback connections. The ensemble network produces sexually dimorphic patterns of GH secretion. In an effort to formalize this system, we implemented a deterministically based autonomous feedback-driven construct of five principal dose-responsive regulatory interactions: GHRH drive of GH pituitary release, competitive inhibition of GH release by SRIF, GH autofeedback via SRIF with a time delay, delayed GH autonegative feedback on GHRH, and SRIF inhibition of GHRH secretion. This formulation engenders a malelike pattern of successive GH volleys due jointly to positive time-delayed feedback of GH on SRIF and negative feedback of SRIF on GH and GHRH. The multipeak volley is explicated as arising from a reciprocal interaction between GH and GHRH during periods of low SRIF secretion. The applicability of this formalism to neuroendocrine control is explored by initial parameter sensitivity analysis and is illustrated for selected feedback-dependent experimental paradigms. The present construct is not overparameterized and does not require an ad hoc pulse generator to achieve pulsatile GH output. Further evolution of interactive constructs could aid in exploring more complex feedback postulates that confer the vivid sexual dimorphism of female GH profiles.     

Joint pituitary-hypothalamic and intrahypothalamic autofeedback construct of pulsatile growth hormone secretion

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is vividly pulsatile in all mammalian species studied. In a simplified model, self-renewable GH pulsatility can be reproduced by assuming individual, reversible, time-delayed, and threshold-sensitive hypothalamic outflow of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH release-inhibiting hormone (somatostatin; SRIF). However, this basic concept fails to explicate an array of new experimental observations. Accordingly, here we formulate and implement a novel fourfold ensemble construct, wherein 1) systemic GH pulses stimulate long-latency, concentration-dependent secretion of periventricular-nuclear SRIF, thereby initially quenching and then releasing multiphasic GH volleys (recurrent every 3-3.5 h); 2) SRIF delivered to the anterior pituitary gland competitively antagonizes exocytotic release, but not synthesis, of GH during intervolley intervals; 3) arcuate-nucleus GHRH pulses drive the synthesis and accumulation of GH in saturable somatotrope stores; and 4) a purely intrahypothalamic mechanism sustains high-frequency GH pulses (intervals of 30-60 min) within a volley, assuming short-latency reciprocal coupling between GHRH and SRIF neurons (stimulatory direction) and SRIF and GHRH neurons (inhibitory direction). This two-oscillator formulation explicates (but does not prove) 1) the GHRH-sensitizing action of prior SRIF exposure; 2) a three-site (intrahypothalamic, hypothalamo-pituitary, and somatotrope GH store dependent) mechanism driving rebound-like GH secretion after SRIF withdrawal in the male; 3) an obligatory role for pituitary GH stores in representing rebound GH release in the female; 4) greater irregularity of SRIF than GH release profiles; and 5) a basis for the paradoxical GH-inhibiting action of centrally delivered GHRH.     

Beta-adrenoceptor activity change after prolonged treatment with growth hormone and somatostatin

1. The effect of 10 days treatment with growth hormone (GH) (l mg/kg body wt/day) and somatostatin (SRIF) (0.25 mg/kg body wt/day) subcutaneously on the activity of β-adrenoceptors in rat hypothalamic, pituitary and cerebral cortical membrane fractions was studied using [³H]dihydroalprenolol ([³H]DHA) as radioligand.2. The administration of GH significantly increased the β-adrenoceptor binding affinity and the administration of SRIF decreased the β-adrenoceptor binding capacity in the hypothalamus.3. In the pituitary the β-adrenoceptor binding affinity was significantly decreased after both hormonal applications.4. In the cerebral cortex the β-adrenoceptor binding affinity was significantly decreased after the GH treatment and increased after the SRIF treatment.5. The present study provides direct evidence for GH and SRIF effects on the activity of rat β-adrenoceptors and supports the view about the involvement of β-adrenergic mechanisms in the neurotransmitter regulation of GH secretion in the rat.     

Beta-adrenoceptor activity change after prolonged treatment with growth hormone and somatostatin.

1. The effect of 10 days treatment with growth hormone (GH) (1 mg/kg body wt/day) and somatostatin (SRIF) (0.25 mg/kg body wt/day) subcutaneously on the activity of beta-adrenoceptors in rat hypothalamic, pituitary and cerebral cortical membrane fractions was studied using [3H]dihydroalprenolol ([3H]DHA) as radioligand. 2. The administration of GH significantly increased the beta-adrenoceptor binding affinity and the administration of SRIF decreased the beta-adrenoceptor binding capacity in the hypothalamus. 3. In the pituitary the beta-adrenoceptor binding affinity was significantly decreased after both hormonal applications. 4. In the cerebral cortex the beta-adrenoceptor binding affinity was significantly decreased after the GH treatment and increased after the SRIF treatment. 5. The present study provides direct evidence for GH and SRIF effects on the activity of rat beta-adrenoceptors and supports the view about the involvement of beta-adrenergic mechanisms in the neurotransmitter regulation of GH secretion in the rat.     

Model-projected mechanistic bases for sex differences in growth hormone regulation in humans

Models of physiological systems facilitate rational experimental design, inference, and prediction. A recent construct of regulated growth hormone (GH) secretion interlinks the actions of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin (SRIF), and GH secretagogues (GHS) with GH feedback in the rat (Farhy LS, Veldhuis JD. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 288: R1649-R1663, 2005). In contrast, no comparable formalism exists to explicate GH dynamics in any other species. The present analyses explore whether a unifying model structure can represent species- and sex-defined distinctions in the human and rodent. The consensus principle that GHRH and GHS synergize in vivo but not in vitro was explicable by assuming that GHS 1) evokes GHRH release from the brain, 2) opposes inhibition by SRIF both in the hypothalamus and on the pituitary gland, and 3) stimulates pituitary GH release directly and additively with GHRH. The gender-selective principle that GH pulses are larger and more irregular in women than men was conferrable by way of 4) higher GHRH potency and 5) greater GHS efficacy. The overall construct predicts GHRH/GHS synergy in the human only in the presence of SRIF when the brain-pituitary nexus is intact, larger and more irregular GH pulses in women, and observed gender differences in feedback by GH and the single and paired actions of GHRH, GHS, and SRIF. The proposed model platform should enhance the framing and interpretation of novel clinical hypotheses and create a basis for interspecies generalization of GH-axis regulation.     

Somatostatin receptor subtype 1 modulates basal inhibition of growth hormone release in somatotrophs

Somatostatin (SST) inhibits the secretion of many peptide hormones including growth hormone (GH). The various functions of SST are mediated through at least five different receptor subtypes (SSTR1-5), their precise physiological roles have not been solved yet. Here we report on studies concerning the functional role of SSTR1 in the modulation of GH release from somatotrophs. Primary cell cultures from pituitaries of wild-type SSTR1 mice exposed to the SSTR1 selective somatostatin analog CH-275 show reduction of basal levels of GH secretion whereas somatotrophs isolated from SSTR1 null mutant mice did not respond to the agonist-mediated effect. This suggests that SSTR1 is involved in modulating basal GH levels in primary pituitary cell cultures and, together with SSTR2, may control the secretion of GH in the body.     

Effects of subchronic alternating cadmium exposure on dopamine turnover and plasma levels of prolactin, GH and ACTH

This study was undertaken to analyze if the effects of subchronic alternating cadmium exposure on pituitary hormone secretion are mediated by changes in dopamine turnover in an age dependent way or are directly correlated to cadmium accumulation at the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Male rats were treated sc. from day 30 to 60 (prepubertal period) or from day 60 to 90 (adult age) of life, with cadmium chloride (CdCl₂) at a dose of 0.5 and 1.0 mg kg^–1 bw, every 4th day in an alternate schedule, starting with the smaller dose. Dopamine (DA) turnover, expressed as the ratio of acid 3,3-dihidroxifenil acetic (DOPAC)/DA in various hypothalamic areas, the plasma levels of prolactin, growth hormone (GH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and cadmium accumulation in the hypothalamus and pituitary were studied. Prepubertal cadmium exposure decreased DA content in all hypothalamic areas studied, although its turnover was not modified. A decrease in plasma ACTH levels with no changes in plasma prolactin and GH levels were found. Cadmium did not accumulate in pituitary while it increased in the hypothalamus. Metal exposure during adulthood decreased DA content in mediobasal and posterior hypothalamus, and its turnover in posterior hypothalamus and median eminence. It decreased plasma prolactin and ACTH levels but not those of GH. Cadmium concentration increased in both hypothalamus and pituitary. These results suggest that cadmium exposure produces age dependent changes on the secretory mechanisms of the pituitary hormones studied, related to the selective accumulation of the metal at both hypothalamic and hypophyseal level changes. However the effects of the metal are not mediated by dopamine.     

Hypothalamic growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) participates in the negative feedback regulation of growth hormone secretion

Effects of growth hormone (GH) excess on immunoreactive hypothalamic GH-releasing factor (GRF) and somatostatin (SRIF) were studied in rats. Hypothalamic GRF content significantly reduced after 7-day daily treatment with 160 micrograms of rat GH or after inoculation of GH-secreting rat pituitary tumors, MtT-F4 for 9 or 13 days and GH3 for 3 months. Basal and 59 mM K+-evoked release of GRF from incubated hypothalami diminished, more than the content, by 43-51% in MtT-F4 tumor- or by 67-83% in GH3 tumor-bearing rats. In contrast, there was a small but significant increase in content or release of SRIF in rats harboring the GH3 or MtT-F4 tumor, respectively. These results indicate the existence of a negative feedback loop via hypothalamic GRF as well as SRIF in control of GH secretion.     

Deterministic construct of amplifying actions of ghrelin on pulsatile growth hormone secretion

Ghrelin is a native ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) receptor that stimulates pulsatile GH secretion markedly. At present, no formal construct exists to unify ensemble effects of ghrelin, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin (SRIF), and GH feedback. To model such interactions, we have assumed that ghrelin can stimulate pituitary GH secretion directly, antagonize inhibition of pituitary GH release by SRIF, oppose suppression of GHRH neurons in the arcuate nucleus (ArC) by SRIF, and induce GHRH secretion from ArC. The dynamics of such connectivity yield self-renewable GH pulse patterns mirroring those in the adult male and female rat and explicate the following key experimental observations. 1) Constant GHS infusion stimulates pulsatile GH secretion. 2) GHS and GHRH display synergy in vivo. 3) A systemic pulse of GHS stimulates GH secretion in the female rat at any time and in the male more during a spontaneous peak than during a trough. 4) Transgenetic silencing of the neuronal GHS receptor blunts GH pulses in the female. 5) Intracerebroventricular administration of GHS induces GH secretion. The minimal construct of GHS-GHRH-SRIF-GH interactions should aid in integrating physiological data, testing regulatory hypotheses, and forecasting innovative experiments.     

The biological activity of catfish pancreatic somatostatin

Catfish pancreatic somatostatin, which contains eight additional amino acids on the amino terminus of a tetradecapeptide with considerable homology to tetradecapeptide somatostatin (SRIF), is a naturally occurring homology of the hypothalamic peptide. The purpose of these studies was to determibe the biological activity of this somatostatin homolog. Inhibition of ¹²⁵I-labelled tyr¹-SRIF binding to bovine pituitart plasma membranes by catfish pancreatic somatostatin was approximately 33% that of SRIF. Pancreatic somatostatin has full biological activity measured by inhibition of growth hormone release from isolated rat pituitary cells, but 0.01–0.1% the potency of SRIF. Pancreatic somatostatin at 100 ng/ml produced a 50–60% inhibition of insulin and glucagon secretion from perfused rat pancreas, while SRIF produced comparable inhibition at 10 ng/ml. This report demonstrates that a larger molecular form and natural homolog of SRIF, isolated from fish pancreas, has the same (but reduced) biological activities in rat assay systems as somatostatin originally isolated from sheep hypothalamus.     

Putative GH pulse renewal: periventricular somatostatinergic control of an arcuate-nuclear somatostatin and GH-releasing hormone oscillator

Growth hormone (GH) pulsatility requires periventricular-nuclear somatostatin(SRIF(PeV)), arcuate-nuclear (ArC) GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), and systemic GH autofeedback. However, no current formalism interlinks these regulatory loci in a manner that generates self-renewable GH dynamics. The latter must include in the adult rat 1) infrequent volleys of high-amplitude GH peaks in the male, 2) frequent discrete low-amplitude GH pulses in the female, 3) disruption of the male pattern by severing SRIF(PeV) outflow to ArC, 4) stimulation of GHRH and GH secretion by central nervous system delivery of SRIF, 5) inhibition of GH release by central exposure to GHRH, and 6) a reboundlike burst of GHRH secretion induced by stopping peripheral infusion of SRIF. The present study validates by computer-assisted simulations a simplified ensemble formulation that predicts each of the foregoing six outcomes, wherein 1) blood-borne GH stimulates SRIF(PeV) secretion after a long time latency, 2) SRIF(PeV) inhibits both pituitary GH and ArC GHRH release, 3) ArC GHRH and SRIF(ArC) oscillate reciprocally with brief time delay, and 4) SRIF(PeV) represses and disinhibits the putative GHRH-SRIF(ArC) oscillator. According to the present analytic construction, time-delayed feedforward and feedback signaling among SRIF(PeV), ArC GHRH, and SRIF(ArC) could endow the complex physiological patterns of GH secretion in the male and female.     

Growth hormone and prolactin secretion in hypophysial stalk-transected pigs as affected by growth hormone and prolactin-releasing and inhibiting factors.

Control of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) release was investigated in hypophysial stalk-transected (HST) and stalk-intact pigs by determining the effects of analogs of GH-releasing factors (GHRF), somatostatin (SRIF), arginine, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, alpha-methyl-rho-tyrosine, and haloperidol. HST and control gilts were challenged with intravenous injections of human pancreatic GHRF(1-40)OH, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, and analogs of rat hypothalamic GHRF. HST animals remained acutely responsive to GHRF by releasing 2-fold greater quantities of GH than seen in controls. This occurred in spite of a 38% reduction in pituitary gland weight and a 32 and 55% decrease in GH concentration and total content. During SRIF infusion, GH remained at similar basal concentrations in HST and control gilts, but increased immediately after stopping SRIF infusion only in the controls. Releasable pituitary GH appears to accumulate during SRIF infusion. GHRF given during SRIF infusion caused a 2-fold greater release of GH than seen in animals receiving only GHRF. Arginine increased (P less than 0.05) GH release in controls, but not in HST gilts, which suggests that it acts through the central nervous system. Basal PRL concentrations were greater (P less than 0.05) in HST gilts than in control gilts. TRH acutely elevated circulating PRL (P less than 0.001) in HST gilts, suggesting that it acts directly on the pituitary gland. Haloperidol, a dopamine receptor antagonist, increased circulating PRL in controls but not in HST animals. alpha-Methyl-rho-tyrosine did not consistently increase circulating PRL, however, suggesting that it did not sufficiently alter turnover rate of the tyrosine hydroxylase pool. The results indicate that the isolated pituitary after HST remains acutely responsive to hypothalamic releasing and inhibiting factors for both GH and PRL release in the pig.     

In vitro release of growth hormone-releasing factor from rat hypothalamus: effect of insulin-like growth factor-1

The release of growth hormone-releasing factor (GHRF) from rat hypothalamus was investigated in vitro. After 60 min preincubation the released GHRF from sliced rat hypothalamic fragments during 60 min incubation was detected by a highly specific and sensitive radioimmunoassay for rat GHRF. The release of GHRF was Ca2+-dependent and enhanced by high concentration of K+. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) significantly decreased GHRF release to 65% and 84% of the control at concentrations of 10(-8) M and 10(-7) M, respectively. These results suggest that this in vitro system is useful for the investigation of the mechanism of GHRF release from the hypothalamus and that IGF-1 is probably involved in the feedback inhibition of growth hormone secretion by attenuating GHRF release from the hypothalamus besides countering the effect of GHRF on the pituitary.     

Growth hormone inhibits growth hormone secretion from the rainbow trout pituitary in vitro

Growth hormone (GH) secretion in salmonids and other fish is under the control of a number of hypothalamic factors, but negative feed-back regulation by circulating hormones can also be of importance for the regulation of GH secretion. Mammalian studies show that GH has a negative feed-back effect on its own secretion. In order to elucidate if GH levels present a direct ultra-short negative feedback loop at the pituitary level GH secretion was studied in intact pituitaries from 50 g fish in an in vitro perifusion system. Following an initial equilibrium period pituitaries were exposed to five increasing concentrations (1-1,000 ng ml(-1)) of ovine GH (oGH) in 20-min steps, before being returned to a GH-free perifusion. Ovine GH caused a significant dose-dependent inhibition of GH secretion and it is concluded that GH can exert a direct negative feedback control on GH secretion at the pituitary level.     

Relation of endogenous opioid peptides and morphine to neuroendocrine functions.

Morphine and the endogenous opioid peptides (EOP) exert similar effects on the neuroendocrine system. When adminstered acutely, they stimulate growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL), and adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) release, and inhibit release of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH),and thyrotropin (TSH). Recent studies indicate that the EOP probably have a physiological role in regulating pituitary hormone secretion. Thus injection of naloxone (opiate antagonist) alone in rats resulted in a rapid fall in serum concentrations of GH and PRL, and a rise in serum LH and FSH, suggesting that the EOP help maintain basal secretion of these hormones. Prior administration of naloxone or naltrexon inhibited stress-induced PRL release, and elevated serum LH in castrated male rats to greater than normal castrate levels. Studies on the mechanisms of action of the EOP and morphine on hormone secretion indicate that they have no direct effect on the pituitary, but act via the hypothalamus. There is no evidence that the EOP or morphine alter the action of the hypothalamic hypophysiotropic hormones on pituitary hormone secretion; they probably act via hypothalamic neurotransmitters to influence release of the hypothalamic hormones into the pituitary portal vessels. Preliminary observations indicate that they may increase serotonin and decrease dopamine metabolism in the hypothalamus, which could account for practically all of their effects on pituitary hormone secretion.