Simultaneous nitrification,denitrification, and phosphorus removal in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor

Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) via the nitrite pathway and anaerobic-anoxic-enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) are two processes that can significantly reduce the energy and COD demand for nitrogen and phosphorus removal. The combination of these two processes has the potential of achieving simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal with a minimal requirement for COD. A lab-scale sequencing batch reactor (SBR) was operated in alternating anaerobic-aerobic mode with a low dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration (0.5 mg/L) during the aerobic period, and was demonstrated to accomplish nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus removal. Under anaerobic conditions, COD was taken up and converted to polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), accompanied by phosphorus release. In the subsequent aerobic stage, PHA was oxidized and phosphorus was taken up to <0.5 mg/L by the end of the cycle. Ammonia was also oxidized during the aerobic period, but without accumulation of nitrite or nitrate in the system, indicating the occurrence of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. However, off-gas analysis showed that the final denitrification product was mainly nitrous oxide (N(2)O), not N(2). Further experimental results demonstrated that nitrogen removal was via nitrite, not nitrate. These experiments also showed that denitrifying glycogen-accumulating organisms (DGAOs), rather than denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (DPAOs), were responsible for the denitrification activity.     

Modeling nitrous oxide emission from rivers: a global assessment

Estimates of global riverine nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions contain great uncertainty. We conducted a meta‐analysis incorporating 169 observations from published literature to estimate global riverine N₂O emission rates and emission factors. Riverine N₂O flux was significantly correlated with NH₄, NO₃ and DIN (NH₄ + NO₃) concentrations, loads and yields. The emission factors EF(a) (i.e., the ratio of N₂O emission rate and DIN load) and EF(b) (i.e., the ratio of N₂O and DIN concentrations) values were comparable and showed negative correlations with nitrogen concentration, load and yield and water discharge, but positive correlations with the dissolved organic carbon : DIN ratio. After individually evaluating 82 potential regression models based on EF(a) or EF(b) for global, temperate zone and subtropical zone datasets, a power function of DIN yield multiplied by watershed area was determined to provide the best fit between modeled and observed riverine N₂O emission rates (EF(a): R² = 0.92 for both global and climatic zone models, n = 70; EF(b): R² = 0.91 for global model and R² = 0.90 for climatic zone models, n = 70). Using recent estimates of DIN loads for 6400 rivers, models estimated global riverine N₂O emission rates of 29.6–35.3 (mean = 32.2) Gg N₂O–N yr⁻¹ and emission factors of 0.16–0.19% (mean = 0.17%). Global riverine N₂O emission rates are forecasted to increase by 35%, 25%, 18% and 3% in 2050 compared to the 2000s under the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment's Global Orchestration, Order from Strength, Technogarden, and Adapting Mosaic scenarios, respectively. Previous studies may overestimate global riverine N₂O emission rates (300–2100 Gg N₂O–N yr⁻¹) because they ignore declining emission factor values with increasing nitrogen levels and channel size, as well as neglect differences in emission factors corresponding to different nitrogen forms. Riverine N₂O emission estimates will be further enhanced through refining emission factor estimates, extending measurements longitudinally along entire river networks and improving estimates of global riverine nitrogen loads.     

Forest streams are important sources for nitrous oxide emissions

Streams and river networks are increasingly recognized as significant sources for the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N₂O). N₂O is a transformation product of nitrogenous compounds in soil, sediment and water. Agricultural areas are considered a particular hotspot for emissions because of the large input of nitrogen (N) fertilizers applied on arable land. However, there is little information on N₂O emissions from forest streams although they constitute a major part of the total stream network globally. Here, we compiled N₂O concentration data from low‐order streams (~1,000 observations from 172 stream sites) covering a large geographical gradient in Sweden from the temperate to the boreal zone and representing catchments with various degrees of agriculture and forest coverage. Our results showed that agricultural and forest streams had comparable N₂O concentrations of 1.6 ± 2.1 and 1.3 ± 1.8 µg N/L, respectively (mean ± SD) despite higher total N (TN) concentrations in agricultural streams (1,520 ± 1,640 vs. 780 ± 600 µg N/L). Although clear patterns linking N₂O concentrations and environmental variables were difficult to discern, the percent saturation of N₂O in the streams was positively correlated with stream concentration of TN and negatively correlated with pH. We speculate that the apparent contradiction between lower TN concentration but similar N₂O concentrations in forest streams than in agricultural streams is due to the low pH (<6) in forest soils and streams which affects denitrification and yields higher N₂O emissions. An estimate of the N₂O emission from low‐order streams at the national scale revealed that ~1.8 × 10⁹ g N₂O‐N are emitted annually in Sweden, with forest streams contributing about 80% of the total stream emission. Hence, our results provide evidence that forest streams can act as substantial N₂O sources in the landscape with 800 × 10⁹ g CO₂‐eq emitted annually in Sweden, equivalent to 25% of the total N₂O emissions from the Swedish agricultural sector.     

Deciphering the oxygen isotope composition of nitrous oxide produced by nitrification

The ability to use δ¹⁸O values of nitrous oxide (N₂O) to apportion environmental emissions is currently hindered by a poor understanding of the controls on δ¹⁸O–N₂O from nitrification (hydroxylamine oxidation to N₂O and nitrite reduction to N₂O). In this study fertilized agricultural soils and unfertilized temperate forest soils were aerobically incubated with different ¹⁸O/¹⁶O waters, and conceptual and mathematical models were developed to systematically explain the δ¹⁸O–N₂O formed by nitrification. Modeling exercises used a set of defined input parameters to emulate the measured soil δ¹⁸O–N₂O data (Monte Carlo approach). The Monte Carlo simulations implied that abiotic oxygen (O) exchange between nitrite (NO₂^?) and H₂O is important in all soils, but that biological, enzyme‐controlled O‐exchange does not occur during the reduction of NO₂^? to N₂O (nitrifier‐denitrification). Similarly, the results of the model simulations indicated that N₂O consumption is not characteristic of aerobic N₂O formation. The results of this study and a synthesis of the published literature data indicate that δ¹⁸O–N₂O formed in aerobic environments is constrained between +13‰ and +35‰ relative to Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW). N₂O formed via hydroxylamine oxidation and nitrifier‐denitrification cannot be separated using δ¹⁸O unless ¹⁸O tracers are employed. The natural range of nitrifier δ¹⁸O–N₂O is discussed and explained in terms of our conceptual model, and the major and minor controls that define aerobically produced δ¹⁸O–N₂O are identified. Despite the highly complex nature of δ¹⁸O–N₂O produced by nitrification this δ¹⁸O range is narrow. As a result, in many situations δ¹⁸O values may be used in conjunction with δ¹⁵N–N₂O data to apportion nitrifier‐ and denitrifier‐derived N₂O. However, when biological O‐exchange during denitrification is high and N₂O consumption is low, there may be too much overlap in δ¹⁸O values to distinguish N₂O formed by these pathways.     

Global soil nitrous oxide emissions since the preindustrial era estimated by an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models: Magnitude,attribution, and uncertainty

Our understanding and quantification of global soil nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions and the underlying processes remain largely uncertain. Here, we assessed the effects of multiple anthropogenic and natural factors, including nitrogen fertilizer (N) application, atmospheric N deposition, manure N application, land cover change, climate change, and rising atmospheric CO₂ concentration, on global soil N₂O emissions for the period 1861–2016 using a standard simulation protocol with seven process‐based terrestrial biosphere models. Results suggest global soil N₂O emissions have increased from 6.3 ± 1.1 Tg N₂O‐N/year in the preindustrial period (the 1860s) to 10.0 ± 2.0 Tg N₂O‐N/year in the recent decade (2007–2016). Cropland soil emissions increased from 0.3 Tg N₂O‐N/year to 3.3 Tg N₂O‐N/year over the same period, accounting for 82% of the total increase. Regionally, China, South Asia, and Southeast Asia underwent rapid increases in cropland N₂O emissions since the 1970s. However, US cropland N₂O emissions had been relatively flat in magnitude since the 1980s, and EU cropland N₂O emissions appear to have decreased by 14%. Soil N₂O emissions from predominantly natural ecosystems accounted for 67% of the global soil emissions in the recent decade but showed only a relatively small increase of 0.7 ± 0.5 Tg N₂O‐N/year (11%) since the 1860s. In the recent decade, N fertilizer application, N deposition, manure N application, and climate change contributed 54%, 26%, 15%, and 24%, respectively, to the total increase. Rising atmospheric CO₂ concentration reduced soil N₂O emissions by 10% through the enhanced plant N uptake, while land cover change played a minor role. Our estimation here does not account for indirect emissions from soils and the directed emissions from excreta of grazing livestock. To address uncertainties in estimating regional and global soil N₂O emissions, this study recommends several critical strategies for improving the process‐based simulations.     

冻融循环期间土壤氧化亚氮排放影响因素

全球气候变化可能会提高冻融循环时间、强度以及频率, 从而可能显著影响土壤氧化亚氮(N₂O)排放。N₂O是一种重要的温室气体, 但目前对冻融循环期间土壤N₂O排放规律以及影响因素的了解还有限。为此, 该研究采用整合分析方法, 从已发表文献中收集了30篇关于冻融循环对土壤N₂O通量和累积排放量影响的文献, 探究冻融循环在不同生态系统对N₂O排放的影响, 从试验设置、土壤基本理化性质以及冻融循环格局等角度全面综合地探究其排放影响因素。该研究得出, 冻融循环能显著增加N₂O通量、N₂O累积排放量和硝化作用速率, 全球平均增幅分别为72.34%、143.25%和124.63%; 冻融循环也可增加反硝化作用速率, 全球平均增幅为162.56%; 与之相反, 冻融循环显著减少微生物生物量氮含量, 全球平均减幅为6.39%。不同生态系统土壤水热条件和基本理化性质差异可显著影响冻融循环对N₂O排放的影响。当年平均气温超过5 ℃时, 冻融循环作用可显著提高N₂O通量104.13%, 显著高于年平均气温为0-5 ℃ (25.56%)和小于0 ℃ (55.29%)时; 土壤湿度大于70%时, N₂O通量增加109.17%, 显著高于土壤湿度为50%-70% (65.67%)和小于50% (20.37%)时的通量。土壤黏粒和养分含量越高的土壤区域, 冻融循环对N₂O排放的提高幅度越大。在有植物存在时, 冻融循环可显著提高土壤N₂O通量达91.21%, 高于无植物存在时的54.43%。土壤过筛和在冻融循环期间采集土壤都会增加冻融循环对N₂O排放的影响。另外, 融化时间长, 冻结强度大和冻融循环频率高均可显著提高土壤N₂O累积排放量对冻融循环的响应。当冻结温度低于-10 ℃时, 冻融循环对土壤N₂O排放通量的增幅可达100.73%, 显著高于在冻结温度为-10- -5 ℃ (47.74%)和高于-5 ℃ (70.25%)时。主要原因是冻结强度高可促进土壤微生物和土壤结构释放更多的养分, 从而提高N₂O的产生和排放。该研究结果有助于更好地理解土壤N₂O对冻融循环的响应及其影响因素, 为更准确地预测未来全球气候变化对N₂O排放影响提供科学数据支撑。     

Nitrous oxide and dinitrogen emissions from urine-affected soil under controlled conditions

A ¹⁵N labelling technique was used to measure N₂O and N₂ emissions from an undisturbed grassland soil treated with cow urine and held at 30 cm water tension and 20°C in a laboratory. Large emissions of dinitrogen were detected immediately following urine application to pasture. These coincided with a rapid and large increase in soil water-soluble carbon levels, some of this increase being attributed to solubilization of soil organic matter by high pH and ammonia concentrations. Emissions of nitrous oxide generally increased with time in contrast to dinitrogen fluxes which decreased as time progressed. Estimated losses of N₂O and N₂ over a 30 day period were between 1 to 5% and 30 to 65% of the urine N applied plus N mineralized from soil organic matter, respectively. Most of the N₂ and N₂O originated from denitrification with nitrification-denitrification being of minor significance as a source of N₂O. Comparisons of the ¹⁵N enrichments in the soil mineral N pools and the evolved N₂O suggested that much of the N₂O was produced in the 5–8 cm zone of the soil. It is concluded that established grassland soils contain large amounts of readily-oxidizable organic carbon which may be used by soil denitrifying organisms when nitrate is non-limiting and soil redox potential is lowered due to high rates of biological activity and high soil moisture contents. ei]{gnR}{fnMerckx}     

Free nitrous acid inhibition on anoxic phosphorus uptake and denitrification by poly-phosphate accumulating organisms

Nitrite has been found in previous research an inhibitor on anoxic phosphorus uptake in enhanced biological phosphorus removal systems (EBPR). However, the inhibiting nitrite concentration reported varied in a large range. This study investigates the nitrite inhibition on anoxic phosphorus uptake by using four different mixed cultures performing EBPR with pH considered an important factor. The results showed that the protonated species of nitrite, HNO(2) (or free nitrous acid, FNA), rather than nitrite, is likely the actual inhibitor on the anoxic phosphorus uptake, as revealed by the much stronger correlation of the phosphorus uptake rate with the FNA than with the nitrite concentration. All the four EBPR sludges showed decreased anoxic phosphorus uptake rates with increased FNA concentrations in the studied range of 0.002-0.02 mg HNO(2)-N/L. The phosphorus uptake by all four cultures was completely inhibited at 0.02 mg HNO(2)-N/L. Granular sludge appeared to be more tolerant to HNO(2) than flocular sludge likely due to its stronger resistance to the transfer of nitrite into the bacterial aggregates. Furthermore, denitrification by the phosphorus-accumulating organisms (PAOs) was also found to be inhibited by HNO(2). The denitrification rate decreased by approximately 40% when the FNA concentration was increased from 0.002 to 0.02 mg HNO(2)-N/L.     

Effect of ammonium and nitrate application on the NO and N2O emission out of different soils

The effect of nitrate and ammonium application (0, 50, 100 and 150 mg N kg^-1 soil) was studied in an incubation experiment. Four Belgian soils, selected for different soil characteristics, were used. The application of both nitrate and ammonium caused an increase of the NO and N₂O emission. The NO production from nitrate and ammonium was found to be of the same order of magnitude. At low pH the NO production was found to be highest from nitrate, at higher pH values the production was found to be higher from ammonium. This seems to be the result of the negative effect of low pH on nitrification.The ANOVA analysis was carried out to separate the effect of the form of nitrogen, quantily of N applied and soil characteristics. The total production of NO was found to depend for 97% on the soil characteristics and for 3% on the quantity of N added. The total N₂O production depended for 100% on the soil characteristics.Stepwise regression analysis showed that the total NO production was best predicted by a combination of the factors CaCO₃ content and NH₄ ⁺ concentration in the soil. Total N₂O production was best described by a combination of CaCO₃, water soluble carbon (WSC) and sand-content.The N₂O/NO ratio was found to be highly variable, indicating that their productions react differently to changes in conditions, or are partly independent.It may be concluded that to NO and N₂O from soils both nitrification and denitrification may be equally important, their relative importance depending on local conditions such as substrate availability, water content of the soil etc. However, the NO production seems to be more nitrification dependent than the N₂O production. ei]{gnE}{fnMerckx}{edSection editor}     

Nitrogen loss from grassland on peat soils through nitrous oxide production

Nitrous oxide (N₂O) in soils is produced through nitrification and denitrification. The N₂O produced is considered as a nitrogen (N) loss because it will most likely escape from the soil to the atmosphere as N₂O or N₂. Aim of the study was to quantify N₂O production in grassland on peat soils in relation to N input and to determine the relative contribution of nitrification and denitrification to N₂O production. Measurements were carried out on a weekly basis in 2 grasslands on peat soil (Peat I and Peat II) for 2 years (1993 and 1994) using intact soil core incubations. In additional experiments distinction between N₂O from nitrification and denitrification was made by use of the gaseous nitrification inhibitor methyl fluoride (CH₃F).Nitrous oxide production over the 2 year period was on average 34 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1 for mown treatments that received no N fertiliser and 44 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1 for mown and N fertilised treatments. Grazing by dairy cattle on Peat I caused additional N₂O production to reach 81 kg N ha^-1 yr^-1. The sub soil (20–40 cm) contributed 25 to 40% of the total N₂O production in the 0–40 cm layer. The N₂O production:denitrification ratio was on average about 1 in the top soil and 2 in the sub soil indicating that N₂O production through nitrification was important. Experiments showed that when ratios were larger than l, nitrification was the major source of N₂O. In conclusion, N₂O production is a significant N loss mechanism in grassland on peat soil with nitrification as an important N₂O producing process.     

DCD不同施用时间对水稻生长期CH4和N2O排放的影响

硝化抑制剂传统的施用方法是在作物移栽或播种前与基肥配合施用.通过温室盆栽试验研究相同施肥条件下,硝化抑制剂双氢胺(dicyandiamide, DCD)不同施用时间(与基肥混施、分孽肥后施入、穗肥后施入)对水稻生长期CH4和N2O排放的影响.结果表明,施入DCD能同时降低CH4和N2O排放量.就整个水稻生长期而言,与基肥混施DCD分别降低21.41%的CH4排放量和8.00%的N2O排放量;调节DCD施用时间至分孽肥后显著降低30.30%的N2O排放量,同时降低5.24%的CH4排放量.就施入DCD到水稻收获的特定生长阶段而言,缓施DCD分别降低32.65%的N2O排放量和11.18%的CH4排放量;晚施DCD对CH4和N2O排放的影响不大.CK、早施DCD、缓施DCD及晚施DCD处理CH4平均排放通量分别为0.95、0.75、0.87 mg/(m2 · h)及0.94 mg/(m2 · h),N2O平均排放通量为155.67、143.24、108.50 μg/(m2 · h)及153.24 μg/(m2 · h),缓施DCD显著降低CH4和N2O排放量(p＜0.01).土壤温度是影响N2O排放的主要因素,而CH4排放通量与土壤Eh呈显著负相关(p＜0.01).     

Challenges for simultaneous nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus removal in microbial aggregates: mass transfer limitation and nitrous oxide production

The microbial community composition and activity was investigated in aggregates from a lab-scale bioreactor, in which nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal occurred simultaneously. The biomass was highly enriched for polyphosphate accumulating organisms facilitating complete removal of phosphorus from the bulk liquid; however, some inorganic nitrogen still remained at the end of the reactor cycle. This was ascribed to incomplete coupling of nitrification and denitrification causing NO(3)(-) accumulation. After 2 h of aeration, denitrification was dependent on the activity of nitrifying bacteria facilitating the formation of anoxic zones in the aggregates; hence, denitrification could not occur without simultaneous nitrification towards the end of the reactor cycle. Nitrous oxide was identified as a product of denitrification, when based on stored PHA as carbon source. This observation is of critical importance to the outlook of applying PHA-driven denitrification in activated sludge processes.     

Effect of oxygen concentration on nitrification and denitrification in single activated sludge flocs

Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) was investigated in the single aeration tank of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Microelectrode measurements and batch experiments were performed to test for the presence of SND. Microelectrodes recorded the presence of O(2) concentration gradients in individual activated sludge flocs. When the O(2) concentration in the bulk liquid was <45 microM, anoxic zones were detected within flocs with a larger diameter (approximately 3000 microm). The O(2) penetration depth in the floc was found to be dependent on the O(2) concentration in the bulk liquid. Nitrification was restricted to the oxic zones, whereas denitrification occurred mainly in the anoxic zones. The nitrification rate of the activated sludge increased with increasing O(2) concentration in the bulk liquid, up to 40 microM, and remained constant thereafter. SND was observed in the aerated activated sludge when O(2) concentration was in the range of 10 to 35 microM.     

Gross nitrous oxide production drives net nitrous oxide fluxes across a salt marsh landscape

Sea level rise will change inundation regimes in salt marshes, altering redox dynamics that control nitrification – a potential source of the potent greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide (N₂O) – and denitrification, a major nitrogen (N) loss pathway in coastal ecosystems and both a source and sink of N₂O. Measurements of net N₂O fluxes alone yield little insight into the different effects of redox conditions on N₂O production and consumption. We used in situ measurements of gross N₂O fluxes across a salt marsh elevation gradient to determine how soil N₂O emissions in coastal ecosystems may respond to future sea level rise. Soil redox declined as marsh elevation decreased, with lower soil nitrate and higher ferrous iron in the low marsh compared to the mid and high marshes (P < 0.001 for both). In addition, soil oxygen concentrations were lower in the low and mid‐marshes relative to the high marsh (P < 0.001). Net N₂O fluxes differed significantly among marsh zones (P = 0.009), averaging 9.8 ± 5.4 μg N m^?2 h^?1, ?2.2 ± 0.9 μg N m^?2 h^?1, and 0.67 ± 0.57 μg N m^?2 h^?1 in the low, mid, and high marshes, respectively. Both net N₂O release and uptake were observed in the low and high marshes, but the mid‐marsh was consistently a net N₂O sink. Gross N₂O production was highest in the low marsh and lowest in the mid‐marsh (P = 0.02), whereas gross N₂O consumption did not differ among marsh zones. Thus, variability in gross N₂O production rates drove the differences in net N₂O flux among marsh zones. Our results suggest that future studies should focus on elucidating controls on the processes producing, rather than consuming, N₂O in salt marshes to improve our predictions of changes in net N₂O fluxes caused by future sea level rise.     

Loss of nitrogen in compacted grassland soil by simultaneous nitrification and denitrification

The soils of mid-Wales in grazed permanent pasture usually exhibit stagnogley features in the top 4–10 cm even though on sloping sites, they are freely drained. Nitrogen is often poorly recovered under these conditions. Our previous studies suggest that continuing loss of available N through concurrent nitrification and denitrification might provide an explanation for poor response to fertilizer N. The work described was designated to further test this proposition. When NH ₄ ⁺ –N was applied to the surface of intact cores, equilibrated at –5kPa matric potential, about 70% of NH ₄ ⁺ –N initially present was lost within 56 days of incubation. Study of different sections of the cores showed a rise in NO ₃ ^- level in the surface 0–2.5 cm soil layer but no significant changes below this depth. The imbalance between NO ₃ ^- accumulation and NH ₄ ⁺ disappearance during the study indicated a simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in the system. Furthermore, the denitrification potential of the soil was 3–4 times greater than nitrification potential so no major build-up of NO ₃ ^- would be expected when two processes occur simultaneously in micro-scale. When nitrification was inhibited by nitrapyrin, a substantial amount of NH ₄ ⁺ –N remained in the soil and persisted till the end of the incubation. The apparent recovery of applied N increased and of the total amount of N applied, 50% more was recovered relative to without nitrapyrin. It appears that addition of nitrapyrin inhibited nitrification, and consequently denitrification, by limiting the supply of NO ₃ ^- for denitrifying organisms. Emission of N₂O from the NH ₄ ⁺ amended soil cores further confirmed that loss of applied N was the result of both nitrification and denitrification, which occurred simultaneously in adjacent sites at shallow depths. This N loss could account for the poor response to fertilizer N often observed in pastoral agriculture in western areas of the UK.     

Nonlinear nitrous oxide (N2O) response to nitrogen fertilizer in on‐farm corn crops of the US Midwest

Row‐crop agriculture is a major source of nitrous oxide (N₂O) globally, and results from recent field experiments suggest that significant decreases in N₂O emissions may be possible by decreasing nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs without affecting economic return from grain yield. We tested this hypothesis on five commercially farmed fields in Michigan, USA planted with corn in 2007 and 2008. Six rates of N fertilizer (0–225 kg N ha^?1) were broadcast and incorporated before planting, as per local practice. Across all sites and years, increases in N₂O flux were best described by a nonlinear, exponentially increasing response to increasing N rate. N₂O emission factors per unit of N applied ranged from 0.6% to 1.5% and increased with increasing N application across all sites and years, especially at N rates above those required for maximum crop yield. At the two N fertilizer rates above those recommended for maximum economic return (135 kg N ha^?1), average N₂O fluxes were 43% (18 g N₂O–N ha^?1 day^?1) and 115% (26 g N₂O–N ha^?1 day^?1) higher than were fluxes at the recommended rate, respectively. The maximum return to nitrogen rate of 154 kg N ha^?1 yielded an average 8.3 Mg grain ha^?1. Our study shows the potential to lower agricultural N₂O fluxes within a range of N fertilization that does not affect economic return from grain yield.     

Factors promoting emissions of nitrous oxide and nitric oxide from denitrifying sequencing batch reactors operated with methanol and ethanol as electron donors

The emissions of nitrous oxide (N₂O) and nitric oxide (NO) from biological nitrogen removal (BNR) operations via nitrification and denitrification is gaining increased prominence. While many factors relevant to the operation of denitrifying reactors can influence N₂O and NO emissions from them, the role of different organic carbon sources on these emissions has not been systematically addressed or interpreted. The overall goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of three factors, organic carbon limitation, nitrite concentrations, and dissolved oxygen concentrations on gaseous N₂O and NO emissions from two sequencing batch reactors (SBRs), operated, respectively, with methanol and ethanol as electron donors. During undisturbed ultimate‐state operation, emissions of both N₂O and NO from either reactor were minimal and in the range of <0.2% of influent nitrate‐N load. Subsequently, the two reactors were challenged with transient organic carbon limitation and nitrite pulses, both of which had little impact on N₂O or NO emissions for either electron donor. In contrast, transient exposure to oxygen led to increased production of N₂O (up to 7.1% of influent nitrate‐N load) from ethanol grown cultures, owing to their higher kinetics and potentially lower susceptibility to oxygen inhibition. A similar increase in N₂O production was not observed from methanol grown cultures. These results suggest that for dissolved oxygen, but not for carbon limitation or nitrite exposure, N₂O emission from heterotrophic denitrification reactors can vary as a function of the electron donor used. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010; 106: 390–398. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Soils,a sink for N2O? A review

Soils are the main sources of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N₂O). The N₂O emission at the soil surface is the result of production and consumption processes. So far, research has concentrated on net N₂O production. However, in the literature, there are numerous reports of net negative fluxes of N₂O, (i.e. fluxes from the atmosphere to the soil). Such fluxes are frequent and substantial and cannot simply be dismissed as experimental noise.
Net N₂O consumption has been measured under various conditions from the tropics to temperate areas, in natural and agricultural systems. Low mineral N and large moisture contents have sometimes been found to favour N₂O consumption. This fits in with denitrification as the responsible process, reducing N₂O to N₂. However, it has also been reported that nitrifiers consume N₂O in nitrifier denitrification. A contribution of various processes could explain the wide range of conditions found to allow N₂O consumption, ranging from low to high temperatures, wet to dry soils, and fertilized to unfertilized plots. Generally, conditions interfering with N₂O diffusion in the soil seem to enhance N₂O consumption. However, the factors regulating N₂O consumption are not yet well understood and merit further study.
Frequent literature reports of net N₂O consumption suggest that a soil sink could help account for the current imbalance in estimated global budgets of N₂O. Therefore, a systematic investigation into N₂O consumption is necessary. This should concentrate on the organisms, reactions, and environmental factors involved.     

Production of nitrous oxide in artificially flooded and drained soils

Production of nitrous oxide (N₂O) was studied in one peaty and one sandy soil undergoing wetting and drying cycles. The background concentration of N₂O in the soil was compared with the N₂O produced during 4 hours of incubation with and without addition of acetylene. The concentration of N₂O in the soil under flooded conditions was relatively stable, and net consumption of N₂O was observed as often as net production. The reference area and drained soils showed somewhat different patterns compared to the flooded soils, which was probably an effect of intermediate soil water conditions. During flooding, the nitrous oxide made up less than 1% of total denitrification on 50% and 54% of the sampling occasions for the peaty and the sandy soil, respectively, and N₂O/(N₂O+N₂)-ratios exceeded 0.2 on only 6% and 3% of the sampling occasions. Under drained conditions and in the reference areas, the ratios showed a more even frequency distribution. Grouping the nitrous oxide production data for different seasons and field conditions, we found few seasonal trends. At the sandy site, mean production of N₂O was larger during the winter months. There were weak correlations between N₂O production and floodwater nitrate concentration, and between N₂O production and soil temperature. N₂O production in the reference area varied between consumption and 4.6 kg N ha^–1 month^–1 and in flooded and drained soil between consumption and 2.6 kg N ha^–1 month^–1.