Poly(ADP-ribose) accessibility to poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase activity on poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated nucleosomal proteins

Hydrolysis of protein-bound 32P-labelled poly(ADP-ribose) by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase shows that there is differential accessibility of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated proteins in chromatin to poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. The rapid hydrolysis of hyper(ADP-ribosyl)ated forms of histone H1 indicates the absence of an H1 dimer complex of histone molecules. When the pattern of hydrolysis of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated histones was analyzed it was found that poly(ADP-ribose) attached to histone H2B is more resistant than the polymer attached to histone H1 or H2A or protein A24. Polymer hydrolysis of the acceptors, which had been labelled at high substrate concentrations (greater than or equal to 10 microM), indicate that the only high molecular weight acceptor protein is poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and that little processing of the enzyme occurs. Finally, electron microscopic evidence shows that hyper(ADP-ribosyl)ated poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, which is dissociated from its DNA-enzyme complex, binds again to DNA after poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase action.     

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of chromatin in an in-vitro poly(ADP-ribose)-turnover system.

This paper describes the effect of an in-vitro poly(ADP-ribose) turnover system on the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of chromatin. Both poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase and poly(ADP-ribose)glycohydrolase were highly purified and used in 4 different turnover systems: non-turnover, slow, medium and fast turnover. These turnover systems were designed to reflect possible turnover conditions in intact cells. The major protein acceptors for poly(ADP-ribose) are histones and the polymerase itself, a process referred to as automodification. The level of poly(ADP-ribose) modification of polymerase, histone H1 and core histones has been measured. The size of the polymer for each of the 3 groups of acceptor proteins has been determined by gel electrophoresis. After many turnover cycles at medium and fast turnover, the histones (H1 and core) become the main poly(ADP-ribose) acceptor proteins. The rate at which steady-state polymer levels are reached and the total accumulation of polymer in a given turnover system are both inversely proportional to the amount of glycohydrolase present. Furthermore, increasing amounts of glycohydrolase in the turnover systems reduces average polymer size. The polymer synthesized in the medium and fast turnover systems is degraded by glycohydrolase in a biphasic fashion and in these systems the half-life of polymer agreed with results found in intact cells. Our results show that the relative levels of polymerase and glycohydrolase activities can regulate the proportional poly(ADP-ribose) distribution on chromatin-associated acceptor proteins during steady-state turnover conditions. The patterns of modification of polymerase and histones under turnover conditions agree with in vivo observations.     

Poly ADP-ribosylation of proteins. Processivity of a post-translational modification

The nuclear enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (EC 2.4.2.30) participates in DNA excision repair by post-translational selfmodification ("automodification") and the modification of other chromatin proteins ("heteromodification") with ADP-ribose polymers. We have studied the molecular mechanism of these reactions in a reconstituted in vitro system. After activation by DNA, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase produces polymers with a distinct size pattern. These polymers are attached to a small subfraction of enzyme molecules. As the reaction progresses, more enzyme molecules are recruited for modification with an identical polymer size pattern. Likewise, the auto- and heteromodification reaction in nucleosomal core particles involves the consecutive addition of a highly conserved polymer size pattern to the acceptor proteins. Thus, a highly conserved polymer size pattern may constitute the molecular signal priming chromatin proteins for a role in DNA excision repair in vivo. The priming reaction is processive.     

Histone shuttling by poly ADP-ribosylation

The enzymes poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase may cooperate to drive a histone shuttle mechanism in chromatin. The mechanism is triggered by binding of the N-terminal zinc-finger domain of the polymerase to DNA strand breaks, which activates the catalytic activities residing in the C-terminal domain. The polymerase converts into a protein carrying multiple ADP-ribose polymers which displace histones from DNA by specifically targeting the histone tails responsible for DNA condensation. As a result, the domains surrounding DNA strand breaks become accessible to other proteins. Poly(ADP0ribose) glycohydrolase attacks ADP-ribose polymers in a specific order and thereby releases histones for reassociation with DNA. Increasing evidence from different model systems suggests that histone shuttling participates in DNA repairin vivo as a catalyst for nucleosomal unfolding.     

Reconstitution of an in vitro poly(ADP-ribose) turnover system

Poly(ADP-ribose) is synthesized and degraded by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and glycohydrolase, respectively. We have reconstituted in vitro two turnover systems containing these two enzymes. We have measured the kinetics of NAD consumption and polymer accumulation during turnover. The combined action of the two enzymes (i.e., turnover) generates a steady state of polymer quantity. The glycohydrolase determines the time and the level at which this steady state of total polymer is reached. A major observation is that the size and calculated density of polymer bound to the total polymerase molecules is tightly regulated by the rate of polymer turnover. On the polymerase, an increase in the rate of polymer turnover does not affect the mean polymer size, but reduces the polymer density on the enzyme (i.e., the number of polymer chains per polymerase molecule). In the absence of glycohydrolase and at low histone H1 concentration (less than 1.5 micrograms/ml), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase preferentially automodifies itself instead of modifying histone H1. In contrast, under turnover conditions, oligomer accumulation on histone H1 was greatly increased, with almost 40% of all the polymer present on H1 after 5 min of turnover. Although turnover conditions were necessary for histone H1 labelling, there was no difference between the fast and the slow turnover systems as concerns the proportion of histone H1 labelling, although the mean polymer size on histone H1 was decreased with increasing turnover rate. Due to its small size, polymer is not degraded by the glycohydrolase and accumulates on histone H1 during turnover. These data suggest that the glycohydrolase modulates the level of poly(ADP-ribosyl)action of different proteins in two ways; by degrading shorter polymers at a slower rate and probably by competing with the polymerase for polymer.     

Noncovalent interactions of poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) with histones.

Covalent linkage of ADP-ribose polymers to proteins is generally considered essential for the posttranslational modification of protein function by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Here we demonstrate an alternative way by which ADP-ribose polymers may modify protein function. Using a highly stringent binding assay in combination with DNA sequencing gels, we found that ADP-ribose polymers bind noncovalently to a specific group of chromatin proteins, i.e., histones H1, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 and protamine. This binding resisted strong acids, chaotropes, detergents, and high salt concentrations but was readily reversible by DNA. When the interactions of variously sized linear and branched polymer molecules with individual histone species were tested, the hierarchies of binding were branched polymers greater than long, linear polymers greater than short, linear polymers and H1 greater than H2A greater than H2B = H3 greater than H4. For histone H1, the target of polymer binding was the carboxy-terminal domain, which is also the domain most effective in inducing higher order structure of chromatin. Thus, noncovalent interactions may be involved in the modification of histone functions in chromatin.     

Histone shuttling by poly(ADP-ribosylation).

We have found that two nuclear enzymes, i.e. poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (EC 2.4.2.30) and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase, may cooperate to function as a histone shuttle mechanism on DNA. The mechanism involves four distinct reaction intermediates that were analyzed in a reconstituted in vitro system. In the first step, the enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is activated in the presence of histone-DNA complexes and converts itself into a protein carrying multiple ADP-ribose polymers. These polymers attract histones that dissociate from the DNA as a histone-polymer-polymerase complex. The DNA assumes the electrophoretic mobility of free DNA and becomes susceptible to nuclease digestion (second step). In the third step, poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase degrades ADP-ribose polymers and thereby eliminates the binding sites for histones. In the fourth step, histones reassociate with DNA, and the histone-DNA complexes exhibit the electrophoretic mobilities and nuclease susceptibilities of the original complexes prior to dissociation. Our results are compatible with the view that the poly(ADP-ribosylation) system acts as a catalyst of nucleosomal unfolding of chromatin in DNA excision repair.     

Modulation of chromatin structure by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is a nuclear enzyme that is highly conserved in eucaryotes. Its activity is totally dependent on the presence of DNA containing single or double stranded breaks. We have shown that this activation results in a decondensation of chromatin superstructure in vitro, which is caused mainly by hyper(ADP-ribosy)ation of histone H1. In core particles, the modification of histone H2B leads to a partial dissociation of DNA from core histones. The conformational change of native chromatin by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is reversible upon degradation of the histone H1-bound poly(ADP-ribose) by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. We propose that cuts produced in vivo on DNA during DNA repair activate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, which then synthesizes poly(ADP-ribose) on histone H1, in particular, and contributes to the opening of the 25-nm chromatin fiber, resulting in the increased accessibility of DNA to excision repair enzymes. This mechanism is fast and reversible.     

Synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose)-agarose beads: an affinity resin for studying (ADP-ribose)n-protein interactions.

Polymers of ADP-ribose bind chromatosomal histones in solution and may play a role in chromatin accessibility in vivo. We have enzymatically synthesized a poly(ADP-ribose) affinity resin to further characterize binding of nuclear proteins to ADP-ribose polymers. NAD+- and (ADP-ribose)-derivatized agarose beads were recognized as polymer acceptors by the nuclear enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. This polymerase elongated the existing ligands by successive addition of exogenously available ADP-ribose residues to form polymers covalently linked to the agarose beads. Poly(ADP-ribose) formation on the beads was dependent on incubation time and the mode of ligand attachment to the agarose. The resulting poly(ADP-ribose)-derivatized agarose beads possessed polymers which closely resembled those modifying the ADP-ribose polymerase by the automodification reaction. Fractionation of rat liver nuclear lysate over the poly(ADP-ribose) resin revealed a strong affinity of H1 for ADP-ribose polymers, thereby supporting a role for poly(ADP-ribose) in chromatin functions. Poly(ADP-ribose)-agarose beads are extremely stable and will be useful not only for affinity studies, but also for mechanistic studies involving polymer elongation and catabolism.     

Poly(ADP-ribosylated) histones in chromatin replication

Poly(ADP-ribosylation) of histones and several other nuclear proteins seem to participate in nuclear processes involving DNA strand breaks like repair, replication, or recombination. This is suggested from the fact that the enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase responsible for this modification is activated by DNA strand breaks produced in these nuclear processes. In this article I provide three lines of evidence supporting the idea that histone poly(ADP-ribosylation) is involved in chromatin replication. First, cellular lysates from rapidly dividing mouse or human cells in culture synthesize a significant number of oligo- in addition to mono(ADP-ribosylated) histones. Blocking the cells by treatment of cultures with 5 mM butyrate for 24 h or by serum or nutrient depletion results in the synthesis of only mono- but not of oligo(ADP-ribosylated) histones under the same conditions. Thus, the presence of oligo(ADP-ribosylated) histones is related to cell proliferation. Second, cellular lysates or nuclei isolated under mild conditions in the presence of spermine and spermidine and devoid of DNA strand breaks mainly synthesize mono(ADP-ribosylated) histones; introduction of a small number of cuts by DNase I or micrococcal nuclease results in a dramatic increase in the length of poly(ADP-ribose) attached to histones presumably by activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Free ends of DNA that could stimulate poly(ADP-ribosylation) of histones are present at the replication fork. Third, putatively acetylated species of histone H4 are more frequently ADP-ribosylated than nonacetylated H4; the number of ADP-ribose groups on histone H4 was found to be equal or exceed by one the number of acetyl groups on this molecule. Since one recognized role of tetraacetylated H4 is its participation in the assembly of new nucleosomes, oligo(ADP-ribosylation) of H4 (and by extension of other histones) may function in new nucleosome formation. Based on these results I propose that poly(ADP-ribosylated) histones are employed for the assembly of histone complexes and their deposition on DNA during replication. Modified histones arise at the replication fork by activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by unligated Okazaki fragments.     

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation studies in situ

We have studied the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of nuclear proteins in situ by examining the incorporation of [3H]NAD-derived ADP-ribose into polymers. We have devised a way to deliver [3H]NAD to cells growing in vitro, and we have determined the kinetics of uptake and incorporation into nuclear proteins using this delivery system. Incorporation into the histone fraction, known acceptors of poly(ADP-ribose), was examined and shown to be sensitive to the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor 3-aminobenzamide. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of 3H-labeled proteins revealed radioactivity associated with known poly(ADP-ribose)-accepting proteins such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and histones. These results were confirmed when we immunoreacted gel-separated proteins with anti-(ADP-ribose) generated in our laboratory.     

Molecular interactions between DNA, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, and histones

Molecular interactions between purified poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, whole thymus histones, histone H1, rat fibroblast genomic DNA, and closed circular and linearized SV40 DNA were determined by the nitrocellulose filter binding technique. Binding of the polymerase protein or histones to DNA was augmented greatly when both the enzyme protein and histones were present simultaneously. The polymerase protein also associated with histones in the absence of DNA. The cooperative or promoted binding of histones and the enzyme to relaxed covalently closed circular SV40 DNA was greater than the binding to the linearized form. Binding of the polymerase to SV40 DNA fragments in the presence of increasing concentrations of NaCl indicated a preferential binding to two restriction fragments as compared to the others. Polymerase binding to covalently closed relaxed SV40 DNA resulted in the induction of superhelicity. The simultaneous influence of the polymerase and histones on DNA topology were more than additive. Topological constraints on DNA induced by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase were abolished by auto ADP-ribosylation of the enzyme. Benzamide, by inhibiting poly(ADP-ribosylation), reestablished the effect of the polymerase protein on DNA topology. Polymerase binding to in vitro-assembled core particle-like nucleosomes was also demonstrated.     

The effect of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation on native and H1-depleted chromatin. A role of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation on core nucleosome structure

The effect of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation on native and H1-depleted chromatin was analyzed by gel electrophoresis, electron microscopy, and velocity sedimentation. In parallel, the interaction of automodified poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase with native and H1-depleted chromatin was analyzed. In H1-depleted chromatin histone H2B becomes the major poly(ADP-ribose) histone acceptor protein, whereas in native chromatin histone H1 was the major histone acceptor. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of H1-depleted chromatin prevented the recondensation of polynucleosomes reconstituted with exogenous histone H1. This is probably due to the presence of modified poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and hyper(ADP-ribosyl)ated histone H2B. Indeed, about 40% of the modified enzyme remained associated with H1-depleted chromatin, while less than 1% of the modified enzyme was bound to native chromatin. The influence of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation on the chromatin conformation was also studied at the level of nucleosome in using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies specific for individual histones and synthetic peptides of histones. In native chromatin incubated in the presence of Mg2+ there was a drop in the accessibility of histone epitopes to monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies whereas upon poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation their accessibility was found to remain even in the presence of Mg2+. In poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated H1-depleted chromatin an increased accessibility of some histone tails to antibodies was observed.     

3'-Deoxy-NAD+ as a substrate for poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase and the reaction mechanism of poly(ADP-ribose) elongation

Adenyl-32P-Labeled 3'-deoxy-NAD+ was utilized as a substrate by pure DNA-dependent poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (EC 2.4.2.30) from calf thymus in the automodification reaction with an apparent Km of 20 microM and a Vmax of 80 nmol/min/mg of protein. Analysis by lithium lauryl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed a single 32P-labeled protein of 116-kDa which comigrated with automodified enzyme. Addition of increasing amounts of histone H1 up to a concentration of 15 micrograms/ml stimulated the synthesis of protein-bound polymers of 3'-deoxy-ADP-ribose. However, the average polymer size was equal to 2 in the presence and 4 in the absence of histone H1, respectively. The synthesis of protein-bound oligomers of 3'-deoxy-ADP-ribose was inhibited by the polymerase inhibitors benzamide, nicotinamide, thymidine, and NaCl. A pulse labeling of polymer synthesis with 40 microM [32P]3'-deoxy-NAD+ either in the presence or absence of 15 micrograms/ml of histone H1, followed by a chase with 1 mM [3H]NAD+, was used to determine the mechanism of poly(ADP-ribose) elongation. Following enzyme digestion of these polymers with phosphodiesterase, it was found that 52 and 24% of the total 32P radiolabel was associated with the 3'-deoxy-AMP termini of the polymers synthesized in the pulse reactions, in the presence or absence of histone H1, respectively. In contrast, less than 10% of the total radioactivity was associated with 3'-deoxy-AMP in the product of the chase reactions. These results are consistent with the conclusion that the initially attached residue of 3'-deoxy-ADP-ribose to either the polymerase or histone H1, is elongated by the "protein-distal" addition of ADP-ribose residues to the AMP terminus of the growing polymer chain.     

The effect of poly(ADP-ribose) on interactions of DNA with histones H1, H3 and H4

The competition between poly(ADP-ribose) and DNA for binding of the histones H1, H3 and H4 was studied, using a membrane filter-binding test. Poly(ADP-ribose) differently affected the interaction between DNA and the individual histones. While poly(ADP-ribose) effectively competed with DNA for binding of histone H4, it equally competed with DNA for binding of histone H3 and only inefficiently competed with DNA for binding of histone H1. Moreover, preformed complexes were correspondingly affected by the addition of competing polynucleotides, thereby also indicating the reversibility of complex formation. The competition capacity of DNA for histone H4 binding did not depend on DNA size. Competition experiments with poly(A) also indicated that poly(ADP-ribose) preferentially affected DNA-histone H4 interaction. The significance of the differing binding properties is discussed with regard to the possible molecular function of poly(ADP-ribose), especially with regard to its potential effect on nucleosome structure.     

Sequential ADP-ribosylation pattern of nucleosomal histones. ADP-ribosylation of nucleosomal histones

The pattern of nucleosomal histones poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is changed under conditions which affect the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation state of the enzyme. At low NAD concentrations the enzyme can poly(ADP-ribosyl)ate histones H1 and H1, H2A, A2A, and H2B. However at NAD concentrations above 10 microM the enzyme preferentially poly(ADP-ribosyl)ates histone H1 to a hyper ADP-ribosylated form. Furthermore we have observed hyper ADP-ribosylation of histone H2B at NAD concentrations of 10 microM suggesting that histone H2B can undergo the same type of ADP-ribosylation pattern as histone H1. Also at higher NAD concentrations an elongation of the polymer attached to the enzyme and other nuclear proteins takes place.     

A nuclear protein-modifying enzyme is responsive to ordered chromatin structure.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, a nuclear protein-modifying enzyme, binds to the internucleosomal linker region of chromatin, although it modifies certain core nucleosomal histones in addition to histone H1. The activity per unit of DNA chromatin changes with the nucleosome repeat number. It reaches a maximum on chromatin of 8-10 nucleosomes in length. As the complexity of chromatin with respect to nucleosome repeat number and compactness increases, a decline and stabilization of specific activity is noted. The difference in specific activity is maintained through resedimentation and dialysis of particles. It does not appear due to differences in polymer chain length or differential degradation of poly (ADP-ribose). The data suggest a relationship between ADP-ribosylation and chromatin organization and vice versa.     

Effect of DNA on poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase and the degradation of histone H1-poly (ADP-ribose) complex from HeLa cell nuclei.

A poly(ADP-ribose)-H1 histone complex has been isolated from HeLa cell nuclei incubated with NAD. The rate of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase catalyzed hydrolysis of the polymer in the complex is only 1/9 that of free poly(ADP-ribose), indicating that the polymer is in a protected environment within the complex. Comparison of the rate of hydrolysis of free poly(ADP-ribose) in the presence or absence of H1 to that in the complex synthesized de novo indicates a specific mode of packaging of the complex. This is further indicated by the fact that alkaline dissociation of the complex followed by neutralization markedly exposes the associated poly(ADP-ribose) to the glycohydrolase. The complex also partially unfolds when it binds to DNA as evidenced by a 2-fold increase in the rate of glycolytic cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose). This effect of DNA is not due to a stimulation of the glycohydrolase per se since hydrolysis of free polymer by the enzyme is strongly inhibited by DNA, especially single-stranded DNA. Inhibition of glycohydrolase by DNA results from the binding of the enzyme to DNA and conditions which decrease this binding (increased ionic strength or addition of histone H1 which competes for DNA binding) relieve the DNA inhibition.     

Activation of poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase by SV 40 minichromosomes: effects of deoxyribonucleic acid damage and histone H1

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is a chromosomal enzyme that is completely dependent on added DNA for activity. The ability of DNA molecules to activate the polymerase appears to be enhanced by the presence of DNA damage. In the present study, we used SV 40 DNA and SV 40 minichromosomes to determine whether different types of DNA damage and different chromosomal components affect stimulation of polymerase activity. Treatment of SV 40 minichromosomes with agents or conditions that induced single-strand breaks increased their ability to stimulate poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis. This stimulation was enhanced by addition of histone H1 at a ratio of 1 microgram of histone H1 to 1 microgram of DNA. Higher ratios of histone H1 to DNA suppressed the ability of SV 40 minichromosomes containing single-strand breaks to stimulate enzyme activity. Treatment of SV 40 minichromosomes or SV 40 DNA with HaeIII restriction endonuclease to produce double-strand breaks markedly stimulated poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity. The stimulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by double-strand breaks occurred in the absence of histone H1 and was further enhanced by adding histone H1 up to ratios of 2 to 1 relative to DNA. At higher ratios of histone H1 to DNA, the presence of the histone continued to enhance the poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis stimulated by double-strand breaks.