Dose-dependent regulation of pair-rule stripes by gap proteins and the initiation of segment polarity

A key step in Drosophila segmentation is the establishment of periodic patterns of pair-rule gene expression in response to gap gene products. From an examination of the distribution of gap and pair-rule proteins in various mutants, we conclude that the on/off periodicity of pair-rule stripes depends on both the exact concentrations and combinations of gap proteins expressed in different embryonic cells. It has been suggested that the distribution of gap gene products depends on cross-regulatory interactions among these genes. Here we provide evidence that autoregulation also plays an important role in this process since there is a reduction in the levels of Kruppel (Kr) RNA and protein in a Kr null mutant. Once initiated by the gap genes each pair-rule stripe is bell shaped and has ill-defined margins. By the end of the fourteenth nuclear division cycle, the stripes of the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve) sharpen and polarize, a process that is essential for the precisely localized expression of segment polarity genes. This sharpening process appears to depend on a threshold response of the eve promoter to the combinatorial action of eve and a second pair-rule gene hairy. The eve and hairy expression patterns overlap but are out of register and the cells of maximal overlap form the anterior margin of the polarized eve stripe. We propose that the relative placement of the eve and hairy stripes may be an important factor in the initiation of segment polarity.     

Gradients of Krüppel and knirps gene products direct pair-rule gene stripe patterning in the posterior region of the Drosophila embryo

Abdominal segmentation of the Drosophila embryo requires the activities of the gap genes Krüppel (Kr), knirps (kni), and tailless (tll). They control the expression of the pair-rule gene hairy (h) by activating or repressing independent cis-acting units that generate individual stripes. Kr activates stripe 5 and represses stripe 6, kni activates stripe 6 and represses stripe 7, and tll activates stripe 7. Kr and kni proteins bind strongly to h control units that generate stripes in areas of low concentration of the respective gap gene products and weakly to those that generate stripes in areas of high gap gene expression. These results indicate that Kr and kni proteins form overlapping concentration gradients that generate the periodic pair-rule expression pattern.     

Drosophila segmentation: supercomputer simulation of prepattern hierarchy

Spontaneous prepattern formation in a two level hierarchy of reaction-diffusion systems is simulated in three space co-ordinates and time, mimicking gap gene and primary pair-rule gene expression. The model rests on the idea of Turing systems of the second kind, in which one prepattern generates position dependent rate constants for a subsequent reaction-diffusion system. Maternal genes are assumed responsible for setting up gradients from the anterior and posterior ends, one of which is needed to stabilize a double period prepattern suggested to underly the read out of the gap genes. The resulting double period pattern in turn stabilizes the next prepattern in the hierarchy, which has a short wavelength with many characteristics of the stripes seen in actual primary pair-rule gene expression. Without such hierarchical stabilization, reaction-diffusion mechanisms yield highly patchy short wave length patterns, and thus unreliable stripes. The model yields seven stable stripes located in the middle of the embryo, with the potential for additional expression near the poles, as observed experimentally. The model does not rely on specific chemical reaction kinetics, rather the effect is general to many such kinetic schemes. This makes it robust to parameter changes, and it has good potential for adapting to size and shape changes as well. The study thus suggests that the crucial organizing principle in early Drosophila embryogenesis is based on global field mechanisms, not on particular local interactions.     

Analysis of maternal effect mutant combinations elucidates regulation and function of the overlap of hunchback and Krüppel gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm embryo

The metameric organisation of the Drosophila embryo is generated early during development, due to the action of maternal effect and zygotic segmentation and homeotic genes. The gap genes participate in the complex process of pattern formation by providing a link between the maternal and the zygotic gene activities. Under the influence of maternal gene products they become expressed in distinct domains along the anteroposterior axis of the embryo; negative interactions between neighboring gap genes are thought to be involved in establishing the expression domains. The gap gene activities in turn are required for the correct patterning of the pair-rule genes; little is known, however, about the underlying mechanisms. We have monitored the distribution of gap and pair-rule genes in wild-type embryos and in embryos in which the anteroposterior body pattern is greatly simplified due to combinations of maternal effect mutations (staufen exuperantia, vasa exuperantia, vasa exuperantia, bicoid oskar, bicoid oskar torsolike, vasa torso exuperantia). We show that the domains of protein distribution of the gap genes hunchback and Krüppel overlap in wild-type embryos. Based on the analysis of the maternal mutant combinations, we suggest an explanation of how this overlap is generated. Furthermore, our data show that different constellations of gap gene activities provide different input for the pair-rule genes, and thus strongly suggest that the overlap of hunchback and Krüppel in wild-type is functional in the formation of the patterns of pair-rule genes.     

Zygotically active genes that affect the spatial expression of the fushi tarazu segmentation gene during early Drosophila embryogenesis

The establishment of the segmental body pattern of Drosophila requires the coordinated functions of three classes of zygotically active genes early in development. We have examined the effects of mutations in these genes on the spatial expression of the fushi tarazu (ftz) pair-rule segmentation gene. Mutations in four gap loci and in three pair-rule loci dramatically affect the initial pattern of transverse stripes of ftz-containing nuclei. Five other pair-rule genes and several other loci that affect the larval cuticular pattern do not detectably affect ftz expression. No simple regulatory relationships can be deduced. Rather, expression of the ftz gene depends upon the interactions among the different segmentation genes active at each position along the anterior-posterior axis of the early embryo.     

Mutually repressive interactions between the gap genes giant and Krüppel define middle body regions of the Drosophila embryo

The gap genes play a key role in establishing pair-rule and homeotic stripes of gene expression in the Drosophila embryo. There is mounting evidence that overlapping gradients of gap gene expression are crucial for this process. Here we present evidence that the segmentation gene giant is a bona fide gap gene that is likely to act in concert with hunchback, Krüppel and knirps to initiate stripes of gene expression. We show that Krüppel and giant are expressed in complementary, non-overlapping sets of cells in the early embryo. These complementary patterns depend on mutually repressive interactions between the two genes. Ectopic expression of giant in early embryos results in the selective repression of Krüppel, and advanced-stage embryos show cuticular defects similar to those observed in Krüppel- mutants. This result and others suggest that the strongest regulatory interactions occur among those gap genes expressed in nonadjacent domains. We propose that the precisely balanced overlapping gradients of gap gene expression depend on these strong regulatory interactions, coupled with weak interactions between neighboring genes.     

Pair-rule and gap gene mutants in the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum

 Early pattern formation in the Drosophila embryo occurs in a syncytial blastoderm where communication between nuclei is unimpeded by cell walls. During the development of other insects, similar gene expression patterns are generated in a cellular environment. In Tribolium, for instance, pair-rule stripes are transiently expressed near the posterior end of the growing germ band. To elucidate how pattern formation in such a situation deviates from that of Drosophila, functional data about the genes involved are essential. In a genetic screen for Tribolium mutants affecting the larval cuticle pattern, we isolated 4 mutants (from a total of 30) which disrupt segmentation in the thorax and abdomen. Two of these mutants display clear pair-rule phenotypes. This demonstrates that not only the expression, but also the function of pair-rule genes in this short-germ insect is in principle similar to Drosophila. The other two mutants appear to identify gap genes. They provide the first evidence for the involvement of gap genes in abdominal segmentation of short-germ embryos. However, significant differences between the phenotypes of these mutants and those of known Drosophila gap mutants exist which indicates that evolutionary changes occurred in either the regulation or action of these genes. Received: 8 May 1998 / Accepted: 17 June 1998     

Breakdown of abdominal patterning in the Tribolium Kruppel mutant jaws

During Drosophila segmentation, gap genes function as short-range gradients that determine the boundaries of pair-rule stripes. A classical example is Drosophila Krüppel (Dm'Kr) which is expressed in the middle of the syncytial blastoderm embryo. Patterning defects in Dm'Kr mutants are centred symmetrically around its bell-shaped expression profile. We have analysed the role of Krüppel in the short-germ beetle Tribolium castaneum where the pair-rule stripes corresponding to the 10 abdominal segments arise during growth stages subsequent to the blastoderm. We show that the previously described mutation jaws is an amorphic Tc'Kr allele. Pair-rule gene expression in the blastoderm is affected neither in the amorphic mutant nor in Tc'Kr RNAi embryos. Only during subsequent growth of the germ band does pair-rule patterning become disrupted. However, only segments arising posterior to the Tc'Kr expression domain are affected, i.e. the deletion profile is asymmetric relative to the expression domain. Moreover, stripe formation does not recover in posterior abdominal segments, i.e. the Tc'Kr(jaws) phenotype does not constitute a gap in segment formation but results from a breakdown of segmentation past the 5th eve stripe. Alteration of pair-rule gene expression in Tc'Kr(jaws) mutants does not suggest a direct role of Tc'Kr in defining specific stripe boundaries as in Drosophila. Together, these findings show that the segmentation function of Krüppel in this short-germ insect is fundamentally different from its role in the long-germ embryo of Drosophila. The role of Tc'Kr in Hox gene regulation, however, is in better accordance to the Drosophila paradigm.     

Non-periodic cues generate seven ftz stripes in the Drosophila embryo

We have examined the expression pattern of the segmentation gene fushi tarazu (ftz) by in situ hybridization to whole mount embryos using digoxygenin labeled probes. This method has revealed previously undetected stages in the development of the ftz RNA pattern. The ftz stripes arise individually in a distinct, non-linear order along the anterior-posterior axis of the embryo. In addition, the stripes develop differentially along the dorsal-ventral axis; most stripes emerge on the ventral side and then gradually spread dorsally until they surround the entire circumference of the embryo. The order of appearance of ftz stripes is not inversely correlated with the order of appearance of hairy (h) stripes as would be expected if ftz stripes were generated by h repression. Furthermore, the seven ftz stripes are correctly established in embryos carrying mutations in h, eve or runt, with normal expression patterns decaying only after cellularization. Thus, the so called primary pair-rule genes are involved in the refinement rather than establishment of the ftz stripes. The contribution of cis-acting regulatory elements to the ftz pattern was examined. The zebra and upstream elements interact to generate seven correctly positioned stripes at the end of cellularization. However, stripe establishement is not correctly mimicked by any ftz/lac fusion gene: stripes arise in an order drastically different from the endogenous ftz gene suggesting the existence of ftz regulatory elements outside the 10-kb region examined to date. These observations suggest that the ftz pattern is directed by at least two independent regulatory systems: first, stripe establishment is directed by regionally distributed factors that act differentially in individual stripes along both anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral axes of the egg and, second, stripe refinement and maintenance are mediated by pair-rule gene products that interact with previously identified ftz regulatory elements. This multi-level regulation provides a back-up system that ensures the development of seven stripes in the blastoderm.     

Double-segment defining role of even-skipped homologs along the evolution of insect pattern formation

Recent studies on insect patterning suggest that the genetic hierarchy may be roughly conserved in phylogenetically divergent species, but pair-rule genes may not function identically in all insects. In order to understand potential evolutionary changes in the role of the pair-rule genes, a Bombyx even-skipped homolog was cloned and its expression pattern during early embryogenesis studied. Eight stripes of Bombyx even-skipped were progressively expressed in an antero–posterior order. Later, these stripes disappeared anteriorly. Under this detection system, Bombyx even-skipped stripes clearly do not resolve into the corre sponding secondary stripes, an obvious difference from Drosophila and Tribolium . These results suggest that Bombyx even-skipped may serve a double-segment defining role and may determine the odd-numbered engrailed stripes.     

Theoretical aspects of stripe formation in relation to Drosophila segmentation

Many aspects of Drosophila segmentation can be discussed in one-dimensional terms as a linear pattern of repeated elements or cell states. But the initial metameric pattern seen in the expression of pair-rule genes is fully two-dimensional, i.e. a pattern of stripes. Several lines of evidence suggest a kinetic mechanism acting globally during the syncytial blastoderm stage may be responsible for generating this pattern. The requirement that the mechanism should produce stripes, not spots or some other periodic pattern, imposes preconditions on this act, namely (1) sharp anterior and posterior boundaries that delimit the pattern-forming region, and (2) an axial asymmetrizing influence in the form of an anteroposterior gradient. Models for Drosophila segmentation generally rely on the gradient to provide positional information in the form of concentration thresholds that cue downstream elements of a hierarchical control system. This imposes restrictions on how such models cope with experimental disturbances to the gradient. A shallower gradient, for example, means fewer pattern elements. This need not be the case if the gradient acts through a kinetic mechanism like reaction-diffusion that involves the whole system. It is then the overall direction of the gradient that is important rather than specific concentration values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)