Prosurvival and antiapoptotic effects of PGE2 in radiation injury are mediated by EP2 receptor in intestine

The biological activities of PGE(2) are mediated through EP receptors (EP(1)-EP(4)), plasma membrane G protein-coupled receptors that differ in ligand binding and signal-transduction pathways. We investigated gastrointestinal EP(2) receptor expression in adult mice before and after radiation injury and evaluated intestinal stem cell survival and crypt epithelial apoptosis after radiation injury in EP(2) null mice. EP(2) was expressed throughout the gut. Intestinal EP(2) mRNA increased fivefold after gamma-irradiation. Crypt survival was diminished in EP(2)-/- mice (4.06 crypts/cross section) compared with wild-type littermates (8.15 crypts/cross section). Radiation-induced apoptosis was significantly increased in EP(2)-/- mice compared with wild-type littermates. Apoptosis was 1.6-fold higher in EP(2) (-/-) mice (5.9 apoptotic cells/crypt) than in wild-type mice (3.5 apoptotic cells/crypt). The EP(2) receptor is expressed in mouse gastrointestinal epithelial cells and is upregulated following radiation injury. The effects of PGE(2) on both crypt epithelial apoptosis and intestinal crypt stem cell survival are mediated through the EP(2) receptor.     

Cellular distribution of prostanoid EP receptors mRNA in the rat gastrointestinal tract

The inhibition of PGE(2) synthesis resulting from sustained NSAIDs therapy has been linked to gastrointestinal irritations and ulceration. The multiple physiological effects of PGE(2) in the gut are mediated through the activation of four receptors termed EP(1-4). The aim of the study was to determine the precise distribution of the four prostaglandin E(2) receptors in the rat stomach, small intestine, and colon. We used non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques on paraffin-embedded tissue. Mucous cells of the stomach and goblet cells of the small intestine and colon were found to express mRNA for all four EP subtypes. A positive hybridization signal for EP(1), EP(3), and EP(4) was detected in the parietal cells of the stomach whereas the chief cells expressed low levels of EP(1) and EP(3). The EP(1) and EP(3) receptor mRNA could also be detected in the muscularis mucosa, longitudinal muscle and enteric ganglias of the stomach and small intestine. However, close examination of the enteric ganglias indicated that most of the positive labeling was localized to the glial cells, although some neurons did express EP(3). In conclusion, we have detailed the distribution of prostanoid EP receptors in the gut at the cellular level, giving new insights to the role of prostaglandins in gastrointestinal functions.     

Differential expression of prostaglandin receptor mRNAs during adipose cell differentiation.

To clarify the molecular basis for the prostaglandin (PG) mediated effects in adipose cells at various stages of their development, expression of mRNAs encoding receptors specific for prostaglandin E2, F2alpha and I2 (i.e. EP, FP, and IP receptors) was investigated in differentiating clonal Ob1771 pre-adipocytes, as well as in mouse primary adipose precursor cells and mature adipocytes. We have further characterized the differential expression of mRNAs encoding three subtypes of the EP receptor, i.e. EP1, EP3, and EP4, and examined the expression of mRNAs encoding the three isoforms (alpha, beta, and gamma) of the EP3 receptor. Altogether the results show that the expression of IP, FP, EP1, and EP4 receptor mRNAs was considerably more pronounced in pre-adipose cells than in adipose cells, mRNAs encoding the alpha, beta, and gamma isoforms of the EP3 receptor were all exclusively expressed in freshly isolated mature adipocytes. These data may indicate that PGI2, PGF2alpha, and PGE2 may interact directly with specific receptors in pre-adipose cells, whose transduction mechanisms are known to affect maturation related changes. In mature adipocytes, however, the equipment of mRNAs encoding the EP3 receptor isoforms is in agreement with the well known effect of PGE2 on adenylate cyclase and lipolysis in mature adipocytes.     

PGE(2) receptors and synthesis in human gastric mucosa: perturbation in cancer

Recent evidence suggests that prostanoids are an important participant in the pathobiology of gastric adenocarcinoma, but the location and identity of cells in tumor-adjacent gastric mucosa able to synthesize and/or bind specific prostanoids is not clear. Using probes for cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 mRNA and protein as well as for the EP family of PGE(2) receptors, we sought to define the biology of prostanoids in adjacent human gastric mucosa at the site of tumor invasion.In mucosa adjacent to an invasive gastric adenocarcinoma, expression of cyclooxygenase was prominent, with COX 1 primarily in mucosal T lymphocytes surrounding nests of tumor cells. Densitometry showed these tumor-adjacent cells had substantial levels of COX 1 immunoreactive protein (relative intensity, 3.2). Cyclooxygenase 2 was newly expressed among these cells as well, but was limited in number (<25% of cyclooxygenase-positive T lymphocytes) in tumor-adjacent mucosa. Further, CD3(+) mononuclear cells, adjacent to tumor, strongly expressed prostanoid receptor EP(4) (relative intensity, 8.0), but cells with this receptor were not evident in the tumor itself. In contrast, normal gastric mucosa showed a consistent and structured expression of cyclooxygenase and PGE(2) receptor immunoreactive protein among mucosal cells. Cyclooxygenase 1 and PGE(2) receptor EP(4) were expressed on mucosal CD3(+) T lymphocytes in the lumenal (upper) third of gastric mucosa; and prostanoid receptors EP(2), EP(3) and EP(4), on gastric epithelia lining gastric pits. In situ hybridization with COX cDNAs confirmed these findings, and neither COX 2-specific mRNA nor protein was detected in normal gastric tissue. Our studies suggest that synthetic machinery and receptors for PGE(2), prominently expressed by T lymphocytes in gastric mucosa at the boundary of normal mucosa with tumor cells, may play a central role in prostanoid-driven tumorigenesis of this tissue.     

Involvement of prostaglandin E receptor EP3 subtype in duodenal bicarbonate secretion in rats

We investigated the involvement of prostaglandin E (PGE) receptor subtype EP3 in the regulatory mechanism of duodenal HCO₃⁻ secretion in rats. A proximal duodenal loop or a chambered stomach was perfused with saline, and HCO₃⁻ secretion was measured using a pH-stat method and by adding 2 mM HCl. Mucosal acidification was achieved through 10 min of exposure to 10 mM HCl in the duodenum or 100 mM HCl in the stomach. Various EP agonists or the EP4 antagonist were given i.v., while the EP1 or EP3 antagonist was given s.c. or i.d., respectively. Sulprostone (EP1/EP3 agonists) stimulated duodenal HCO₃⁻ secretion in a dose-dependent manner, and this response was inhibited by AE5-599 (EP3 antagonist) but not AE3-208 (EP4 antagonist). AE1-329 (EP4 agonist) also increased duodenal HCO₃⁻ secretion, and this action was inhibited by AE3-208 but not AE5-599. The response to PGE₂ or acidification in the duodenum was partially attenuated by AE5-599 or AE3-208 alone but completely abolished by the combined administration. Duodenal damage caused by mucosal perfusion with 150 mM HCl for 4 h was worsened by pretreatment with AE5-599 and AE3-208 as well as indomethacin and further aggravated by co-administration of these antagonists. Neither the EP3 nor EP4 antagonist had any effect on the gastric response induced by PGE₂ or acidification. These results clearly demonstrate the involvement of EP3 receptors, in addition to EP4 receptors, in the regulation of duodenal HCO₃⁻ secretion as well as the maintenance of the mucosal integrity of the duodenum against acid injury.     

Prostaglandin E2 stimulates cystogenesis through EP4 receptor in IMCD-3 cells

Previously, we demonstrated that prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) induced cAMP and cyst formation through PGE(2) receptor-2 (EP2) activity in human autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) epithelial cells. In this study, we determined the role of EP2 and EP4 receptors in mediating PGE(2) stimulation of cAMP signaling and cystogenesis in mouse renal epithelial cells using the inner medullary collecting duct-3 (IMCD-3) cell line. In contrast to human ADPKD cells, using novel EP2 and EP4 antagonists, we found that IMCD-3 cells expressed functional EP4 but not EP2, which stimulated cAMP formation and led to cyst formation in 3D culture system. The involvement of EP4 receptors in IMCD-3 cells was further supported by the specific effect of EP4 siRNA that inhibited PGE(2)-induced cystogenesis. We also observed different cellular localization of EP2 or EP4 receptors in IMCD-3 transfected cells. Collectively, our results suggest an important role of different expression of EP2 or EP4 receptors in the regulation of cystogenesis.     

Prostaglandin E prevents indomethacin-induced gastric and intestinal damage through different EP receptor subtypes

Gastrointestinal ulcerogenic effect of indomethacin is causally related with an endogenous prostaglandin (PG) deficiency, yet the detailed mechanism remains unknown. We examined the effect of various PGE analogues specific to EP receptor subtypes on these lesions in rats and mice, and investigated which EP receptor subtype is involved in the protective action of PGE(2). Fasted or non-fasted animals were given indomethacin s.c. at 35 mg/kg for induction of gastric lesions or 10-30 mg/kg for intestinal lesions, and they were killed 4 or 24 h later, respectively. Various EP agonists were given i.v. 10 min before indomethacin. Indomethacin caused hemorrhagic lesions in both the stomach and intestine. Prior administration of 16,16-dimethyl PGE(2) (dmPGE(2)) prevented the development of damage in both tissues, and the effect in the stomach was mimicked by 17-phenyl PGE2 (EP1), while that in the small intestine was reproduced by ONO-NT-012 (EP3) and ONO-AE-329 (EP4). Butaprost (EP2) did not have any effect on either gastric or intestinal lesions induced by indomethacin. Similar to the findings in rats, indomethacin caused gastric and intestinal lesions in both wild-type and knockout mice lacking EP1 or EP3 receptors. However, the protective action of dmPGE(2) in the stomach was observed in wild-type and EP3 receptor knockout mice but not in mice lacking EP1 receptors, while that in the intestine was observed in EP1 knockout as well as wild-type mice but not in the animals lacking EP3 receptors. These results suggest that indomethacin produced damage in the stomach and intestine in a PGE(2)-sensitive manner, and exogenous PGE(2) prevents gastric and intestinal ulcerogenic response to indomethacin through different EP receptor subtypes; the protection in the stomach is mediated by EP1 receptors, while that in the intestine mediated by EP3/EP4 receptors.     

Prostaglandin E2 aggravates gastric mucosal injury induced by histamine in rats through EP1 receptors

We demonstrated that prostaglandin (PG) E2 aggravates gastric mucosal injury caused by histamine in rats, and investigated using various EP agonists which EP receptor subtype is involved in this phenomenon. Rats were used after 18 hr fasting. Histamine (80 mg/kg) dissolved in 10% gelatin, was given s.c., either alone or in combination with i.v. administration of PGE2 or various EP agonists such as 17-phenyl PGE2 (EP1), butaprost (EP2), sulprostone (EP1/EP3), ONO-NT012 (EP3) and ONO-AE1-329 (EP4). The animals were killed 4 hr later, and the mucosa was examined for lesions. The mucosal permeability was determined using Evans blue (1%). Histamine alone induced few lesions in the gastric mucosa within 4 hr. PGE2 dose-dependently worsened the lesions induced by histamine, the response being inhibited by tripelennamine but not cimetidine. The effect of PGE2 was mimicked by 17-phenyl PGE2 and sulprostone, but not other EP agonists, including EP2, EP3, and EP3/EP4 agonists. The mucosal vascular permeability was slightly increased by histamine, and this response was markedly enhanced by co-administration of 17-phenyl PGE2 as well as PGE2. The mucosal ulcerogenic and vascular permeability responses induced by histamine plus PGE2 were both suppressed by pretreatment with ONO-AE829, the EP1 antagonist. These results suggest that PGE2 aggravates histamine-induced gastric mucosal injury in rats. This action of PGE2 is mediated by EP1 receptors and functionally associated with potentiation of the increased vascular permeability caused by histamine through stimulation of H1-receptors.     

Mucosal prostanoid receptors and synthesis in familial adenomatous polyposis

Chronic ingestion of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication is reported to delay or, in part, reverse development of polyps in the colon, but the mechanism for this effect is unknown. Using mRNA and immunoglobulin probes, specific for prostanoid receptors and for prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase (COX 1 and 2), we sought to define, by in situ and in vitro techniques, changes in PGE2 receptors and synthesis in cell populations of precancerous familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) colonic mucosa. In FAP, expression of prostanoid receptors EP3 and EP4 among colonic lamina propria mononuclear and lateral crypt epithelial cells was robust, with 53.9+/-5.3% of mononuclear cells staining EP4+. When sections of normal colonic mucosa were examined by similar techniques, prostanoid receptor EP4 was expressed on only 21.3+/-1.2% of lamina propria mononuclear cells (including CD4+ T lymphocytes), as well as on surface and lateral crypt epithelium, and this distribution was found at the mRNA level as well. When receptor expression was quantitated by densitometry, immunoreactive EP3 protein on deep basolateral (but not other) FAP crypt epithelium was enhanced 2.8-fold over normal, and the number of prostanoid receptor EP4+ mononuclear cells by 2.5-fold. On the other hand, while COX 1 expression in mononuclear cells was prominent in normal and FAP mucosa, densitometric analysis showed immunoreactive prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase levels were further increased in FAP, due to a greater than fourfold elevation of COX 2 expression among mononuclear cells and epithelia. Our data suggest enhanced cell-specific prostanoid receptor expression and increased prostanoid synthesis in precancerous FAP mucosa.     

Dual action of prostaglandin E2 on gastric acid secretion through different EP-receptor subtypes in the rat

We examined the role of prostaglandin E (EP) receptor subtypes in the regulation of gastric acid secretion in the rat. Under urethane anesthesia, the stomach was superfused with saline, and the acid secretion was determined at pH 7.0 by adding 50 mM NaOH. The acid secretion was stimulated by intravenous infusion of histamine or pentagastrin. Various EP agonists were administered intravenously, whereas EP antagonists were given subcutaneously 30 min or intravenously 10 min before EP agonists. PGE(2) suppressed the acid secretion stimulated by either histamine or pentagastrin in a dose-dependent manner. The acid inhibitory effect of PGE(2) was mimicked by sulprostone (EP(1)/EP(3) agonist) but not butaprost (EP(2) agonist) or AE1-329 (EP(4) agonist). The inhibitory effect of sulprostone, which was not affected by ONO-8711 (EP(1) antagonist), was more potent against pentagastrin- (50% inhibition dose: 3.6 mug/kg) than histamine-stimulated acid secretion (50% inhibition dose: 18.0 mug/kg). Pentagastrin increased the luminal release of histamine, and this response was also inhibited by sulprostone. On the other hand, AE1-329 (EP(4) agonist) stimulated the acid secretion in vagotomized animals with a significant increase in luminal histamine. This effect of AE1-329 was totally abolished by cimetidine as well as AE3-208 (EP(4) antagonist). These results suggest that PGE(2) has a dual effect on acid secretion: inhibition mediated by EP(3) receptors and stimulation through EP(4) receptors. The former effect may be brought about by suppression at both parietal and enterochromaffin-like cells, whereas the latter effect may be mediated by histamine released from enterochromaffin-like cells.     

Gastric mucosal protection against ethanol by EP2 and EP4 signaling through the inhibition of leukotriene C4 production

Prostaglandin (PG)E derivatives are widely used for treating gastric mucosal injury. PGE receptors are classified into four subtypes, EP(1), EP(2), EP(3), and EP(4). We have tested which EP receptor subtypes participate in gastric mucosal protection against ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury and clarified the mechanisms of such protection. The gastric mucosa of anesthetized rats was perfused at 2 ml/min with physiological saline, agonists for EP(1), EP(2), EP(3), and EP(4), or 50% ethanol, using a constant-rate pump connected to a cannula placed in the esophagus. The gastric microcirculation of the mucosal base of anesthetized rats was observed by transillumination through a window made by removal of the adventitia and muscularis externa. PGE(2) and subtype-specific EP agonists were applied to the muscularis mucosae at the window. Application of 50% ethanol dilated the mucosal arterioles and constricted the collecting venules. Collecting venule constriction by ethanol was completely inhibited by PGE(2) and by EP(2) and EP(4) agonists (100 nM) but not by an EP(1) or an EP(3) agonist. Ethanol-induced mucosal injury was also inhibited by EP(2) and EP(4) agonists. When leukotriene (LT)C(4) levels in the perfusate of the gastric mucosa were determined by ELISA, intragastric ethanol administration elevated the LTC(4) levels sixfold from the basal levels. These elevated levels were significantly (60%) reduced by both EP(2) and EP(4) agonists but not by other EP agonists. Since LTC(4) application at the window constricted collecting venules strongly, and an LTC antagonist reduced ethanol-induced mucosal injury, reductions in LTC(4) generation in response to EP(2) and EP(4) receptor signaling may be relevant to the protective action of PGE(2). The present results indicate that EP(2) and EP(4) receptor signaling inhibits ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury through cancellation of collecting venule constriction by reducing LTC(4) production.     

Interleukin-1 is cytoprotective, antisecretory, stimulates PGE2 synthesis by the stomach, and retards gastric emptying

Human recombinant interleukin 1 beta (IL-1) administered intraperitoneally to rats produced the following gastric effects: 1. It was cytoprotective, preventing gastric mucosal necrosis produced by oral administration of one ml of absolute ethanol to fasted animals. The ED50 was 1200 units/kg (110 ng per animal). IL-1 was 125 times more potent than prostaglandin E2 (on a weight basis), and 6,000 times more potent (on a molar basis). 2. The cytoprotective effect of IL-1 was blocked by indomethacin (inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis) and by IRAP (a specific interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein). IRAP did not inhibit cytoprotection induced by PGE2. 3. IL-1 prevented the formation of gastric erosions induced by aspirin. 4. IL-1 inhibited gastric secretion (volume, acid concentration and output), in the pylorus-ligated rat, with an ED50 of 300 units/kg (3.2 ng per animal). 5. Indomethacin and IRAP blocked the antisecretory effect of IL-1. 6. IL-1 retarded gastric emptying, an effect blocked by IRAP, but not by indomethacin. 7. IL-1 increased synthesis of prostaglandin E2 by the gastric mucosa by 111%. IL-1 is the most potent of known agents that are gastric cytoprotective, antiulcer, antisecretory, and delay gastric emptying. It appears to act mostly by stimulating the synthesis of prostaglandins by the stomach. These studies suggest that the stomach possesses IL-1 receptors. These are probably located on parietal cells (that produce acid), on prostaglandin-producing cells, on smooth muscle cells (responsible for gastric emptying), and on as yet unidentified cells involved in gastric cytoprotection. Both IL-1 and IRAP, being natural substances, may play a physiological role in the maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity, and in the regulation of acid secretion and gastric motility.     

HGF triggers activation of the COX-2 gene in rat gastric epithelial cells: action mediated through the ERK2 signaling pathway.

Although it is established that growth factors and prostaglandins function in the maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity and in the healing of gastric mucosal injury and ulceration, the regulatory relationship between growth factors and prostaglandins in the gastric mucosa is not well characterized. Therefore, we investigated whether hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) affects expression of COX-2 (the inducible form of the prostaglandin synthesizing enzyme, cyclooxygenase) in gastric epithelial cells and whether this action is mediated through the MAP (ERK) kinase signaling pathway. In RGM1 cells (an epithelial cell line derived from normal rat gastric mucosa), HGF caused an increase in COX-2 mRNA and protein by 236% and 175%, respectively (both P<0.05). This induction of COX-2 expression was abolished by pretreatment with the MAPK kinase (MEK) inhibitor PD98059. HGF also triggered a 13-fold increase in c-Met/HGF receptor phosphorylation (P<0.005) and increased ERK2 activity by 684% (P<0.01). Pretreatment with PD98059 abolished the HGF-induced increase in ERK2 activity, but not c-Met/HGF receptor phosphorylation. The specific inhibitor of p38 MAP kinase, SB203580, had no effect on HGF-induced COX-2 expression. Thus, HGF triggers activation of the COX-2 gene in gastric epithelial cells through phosphorylation of c-Met/HGF receptor and activation of the ERK2 signaling pathway.-Jones, M. K., Sasaki, E., Halter, F., Pai, R., Nakamura, T., Arakawa, T., Kuroki, T., Tarnawski, A. S. HGF triggers activation of the COX-2 gene in rat gastric epithelial cells: action mediated through the ERK2 signaling pathway.     

PGE1 and PGE2 modify platelet function through different prostanoid receptors

There is evidence that the overall effects of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) on human platelet function are the consequence of a balance between promotory effects of PGE(2) acting at the EP3 receptor and inhibitory effects acting at the EP4 receptor, with no role for the IP receptor. Another prostaglandin that has been reported to affect platelet function is prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)), however the receptors that mediate its actions on platelet function have not been fully defined. Here we have used measurements of platelet aggregation and P-selectin expression induced by the thromboxane A(2) mimetic U46619 to compare the effects of PGE(1) and PGE(2) on platelet function. Their effects on vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation, as a marker of cAMP, were also determined. We also investigated the ability of the selective prostanoid receptor antagonists CAY10441 (IP antagonist), DG-041 (EP3 antagonist) and ONO-AE3-208 (EP4 antagonist) to modify the effects of the prostaglandins on platelet function. The results obtained confirm that PGE(2) interacts with EP3 and EP4 receptors, but not IP receptors. In contrast PGE(1) interacts with EP3 and IP receptors, but not EP4 receptors. In both cases the overall effects on platelet function reflect the balance between promotory and inhibitory effects at receptors that have opposite effects on adenylate cyclase.     

Nuclear prostaglandin signaling system: biogenesis and actions via heptahelical receptors

Prostaglandins are ubiquitous lipid mediators that play pivotal roles in cardiovascular homeostasis, reproduction, and inflammation, as well as in many important cellular processes including gene expression and cell proliferation. The mechanism of action of these lipid messengers is thought to be primarily dependent on their interaction with specific cell surface receptors that belong to the heptahelical transmembrane spanning G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Accumulating evidence suggests that these receptors may co-localize at the cell nucleus where they can modulate gene expression through a series of biochemical events. In this context, we have recently demonstrated that prostaglandin E2-EP3 receptors display an atypical nuclear compartmentalization in cerebral microvascular endothelial cells. Stimulation of these nuclear EP3 receptors leads to an increase of eNOS RNA in a cell-free isolated nuclear system. This review will emphasize these findings and describe how nuclear prostaglandin receptors, notably EP3 receptors, may affect gene expression, specifically of eNOS, by identifying putative transducing elements located within this organelle. The potential sources of lipid ligand activators for these intracellular sites will also be addressed. The expressional control of G-protein-coupled receptors located at the perinuclear envelope constitutes a novel and distinctive mode of gene regulation.