High resolution ion chamber array delivery quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery: Commissioning and validation

PurposeHigh precision radiosurgery demands comprehensive delivery-quality-assurance techniques. The use of a liquid-filled ion-chamber-array for robotic-radiosurgery delivery-quality-assurance was investigated and validated using several test scenarios and routine patient plans.Methods and materialPreliminary evaluation consisted of beam profile validation and analysis of source–detector-distance and beam-incidence-angle response dependence. The delivery-quality-assurance analysis is performed in four steps: (1) Array-to-plan registration, (2) Evaluation with standard Gamma-Index criteria (local-dose-difference ⩽ 2%, distance-to-agreement ⩽ 2 mm, pass-rate ⩾ 90%), (3) Dose profile alignment and dose distribution shift until maximum pass-rate is found, and (4) Final evaluation with 1 mm distance-to-agreement criterion. Test scenarios consisted of intended phantom misalignments, dose miscalibrations, and undelivered Monitor Units. Preliminary method validation was performed on 55 clinical plans in five institutions.ResultsThe 1000SRS profile measurements showed sufficient agreement compared with a microDiamond detector for all collimator sizes. The relative response changes can be up to 2.2% per 10 cm source–detector-distance change, but remains within 1% for the clinically relevant source–detector-distance range. Planned and measured dose under different beam-incidence-angles showed deviations below 1% for angles between 0° and 80°. Small-intended errors were detected by 1 mm distance-to-agreement criterion while 2 mm criteria failed to reveal some of these deviations. All analyzed delivery-quality-assurance clinical patient plans were within our tight tolerance criteria.ConclusionWe demonstrated that a high-resolution liquid-filled ion-chamber-array can be suitable for robotic radiosurgery delivery-quality-assurance and that small errors can be detected with tight distance-to-agreement criterion. Further improvement may come from beam specific correction for incidence angle and source–detector-distance response.     

Investigating the spatial accuracy of CBCT-guided cranial radiosurgery: A phantom end-to-end test study

PurposeTo evaluate the spatial accuracy of a frameless cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided cranial radiosurgery (SRS) using an end-to-end (E2E) phantom test methodology.Methods and materialsFive clinical SRS plans were mapped to an acrylic phantom containing a radiochromic film. The resulting phantom-based plans (E2E plans) were delivered four times. The phantom was setup on the treatment table with intentional misalignments, and CBCT-imaging was used to align it prior to E2E plan delivery. Comparisons (global gamma analysis) of the planned and delivered dose to the film were performed using a commercial triple-channel film dosimetry software. The necessary distance-to-agreement to achieve a 95% (DTA95) gamma passing rate for a fixed 3% dose difference provided an estimate of the spatial accuracy of CBCT-guided SRS. Systematic (∑) and random (σ) error components, as well as 95% confidence levels were derived for the DTA95 metric.ResultsThe overall systematic spatial accuracy averaged over all tests was 1.4 mm (SD: 0.2 mm), with a corresponding 95% confidence level of 1.8 mm. The systematic (Σ) and random (σ) spatial components of the accuracy derived from the E2E tests were 0.2 mm and 0.8 mm, respectively.ConclusionsThe E2E methodology used in this study allowed an estimation of the spatial accuracy of our CBCT-guided SRS procedure. Subsequently, a PTV margin of 2.0 mm is currently used in our department.     

A novel method for dose distribution registration using fiducial marks made by a megavoltage beam in film dosimetry for intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance

PurposePhotographic film is widely used for the dose distribution verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). However, analysis for verification of the results is subjective. We present a novel method for marking the isocenter using irradiation from a megavoltage (MV) beam transmitted through slits in a multi-leaf collimator (MLC).MethodsWe evaluated the effect of the marking irradiation at 500 monitor units (MU) on the total transmission through the MLC using an ionization chamber and Radiochromic Film. Film dosimetry was performed for quality assurance (QA) of IMRT plans. Three methods of registration were used for each film: marking by irradiating with an MV beam through slits in the MLC (MLC-IC); marking with a fabricated phantom (Phantom-IC); and a subjective method based on isodose lines (Manual). Each method was subjected to local γ-analysis.ResultsThe effect of the marking irradiation on the total transmission was 0.16%, as measured by a ionization chamber at a 10-cm depth in a solid phantom, while the inter-leaf transmission was 0.3%, determined from the film. The mean pass rates for each registration method agreed within ±1% when the criteria used were a distance-to-agreement (DTA) of 3 mm and a dose difference (DD) of 3%. For DTA/DD criteria of 2 mm/3%, the pass rates in the sagittal plane were 96.09 ± 0.631% (MLC-IC), 96.27 ± 0.399% (Phantom-IC), and 95.62 ± 0.988% (Manual).ConclusionThe present method is a versatile and useful method of improving the objectivity of film dosimetry for IMRT QA.     

On the interplay effect for moving targets treated with the CyberKnife static tracking system

PurposeTo assess the interplay effect amplitude between different planned MU distributions and respiratory patterns in the CyberKnife system when treating moving targets with static tracking technique.MethodsSmall- and Large-Respiratory Motions (SRM and LRM) differing in amplitude and frequency were simulated in a semi-anthropomorphic dynamic thorax phantom. The interplay effect was evaluated for both respiration motions in terms of GTV coverage and conformity for three plans designed with an increasing range of MU per beam (small, medium and large). Each plan was delivered three times changing the initial beam-on phase to assess the inter-fraction variation. Dose distributions were measured using radiochromic films placed in the GTV axial and sagittal planes.ResultsGenerally, SRM plans gave higher GTV coverage and were less dependent on beam-on phases than LRM plans. For SRM (LRM) plans, the GTV coverage ranged from 95.2% to 99.7% (85.9% to 99.8%). Maximum GTV coverage was found for large MU plans in SRM and for small MU plans in LRM. Minimum GTV coverage was found for medium MU plans for both SRM and LRM. For SRM plans, dose conformity decreased with increasing MU range while the variation was reduced for LRM plans. Large MU plans reduced the inter-fraction variation for SRM and LRM.ConclusionsWe confirmed the interplay effect between target motion and beam irradiation time for CyberKnife static tracking. Plans with large MU per beam improved the GTV coverage for small motion amplitude and the inter-fraction dose variation for large motion amplitude.     

Geometric and dosimetric quality assurance using logfiles and a 3D helical diode detector for Dynamic WaveArc

PurposeTo conduct patient-specific geometric and dosimetric quality assurance (QA) for the Dynamic WaveArc (DWA) using logfiles and ArcCHECK (Sun Nuclear Inc., Melbourne, FL, USA).MethodsTwenty DWA plans, 10 for pituitary adenoma and 10 for prostate cancer, were created using RayStation version 4.7 (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden). Root mean square errors (RMSEs) between the actual and planned values in the logfiles were evaluated. Next, the dose distributions were reconstructed based on the logfiles. The differences between dose-volumetric parameters in the reconstructed plans and those in the original plans were calculated. Finally, dose distributions were assessed using ArcCHECK. In addition, the reconstructed dose distributions were compared with planned ones.ResultsThe means of RMSEs for the gantry, O-ring, MLC position, and MU for all plans were 0.2°, 0.1°, 0.1 mm, and 0.4 MU, respectively. Absolute means of the change in PTV D_99% were 0.4 ± 0.4% and 0.1 ± 0.1% points between the original and reconstructed plans for pituitary adenoma and prostate cancer, respectively. The mean of the gamma passing rate (3%/3 mm) between the measured and planned dose distributions was 97.7%. In addition, that between the reconstructed and planned dose distributions was 99.6%.ConclusionsWe have demonstrated that the geometric accuracy and gamma passing rates were within AAPM 119 and 142 criteria during DWA. Dose differences in the dose-volumetric parameters using the logfile-based dose reconstruction method were also clinically acceptable in DWA.     

Dosimetric and localization accuracy of Elekta high definition dynamic radiosurgery

Background and PurposeWith the increasingly prominent role of stereotactic radiosurgery in radiation therapy, there is a clinical need for robust, efficient, and accurate solutions for targeting multiple sites with one patient setup. The end-to-end accuracy of high definition dynamic radiosurgery with Elekta treatment planning and delivery systems was investigated in this study.Materials and MethodsA patient-derived CT scan was used to create a radiosurgery plan to seven targets in the brain. Monaco was used for treatment planning using 5 VMAT non-coplanar arcs. Prior to delivery, 3D-printed phantoms from RTsafe were ordered including a gel phantom for 3D dosimetry, phantom with 2D film insert, and an ion chamber phantom for point dose measurement. Delivery was performed using the Elekta VersaHD, XVI cone-beam CT, and HexaPOD six degree of freedom tabletop.ResultsAbsolute dose accuracy was verified within 2%. 3D global gamma analysis in the film measurement revealed 3%/2 mm passing rates >95%. Gel dosimetry 3D global gamma analysis (3%/2 mm) were above 90% for all targets with the exception of one. Results were indicative of typical end-to-end accuracies (<1 mm spatial uncertainty, 2% dose accuracy) within 4 cm of isocenter. Beyond 4 cm, 2 mm accuracy was found.ConclusionsHigh definition dynamic radiosurgery expands clinically acceptable stereotactic accuracy to a sphere around isocenter allowing for radiosurgery of several targets with one setup with a high degree of dosimetric precision. Gel dosimetry proved to be an essential tool for the validation of the 3D dose distributions in this technique.     

Design and clinical use of a rotational phantom for dosimetric verification of IMRT/VMAT treatments

PurposeTo describe the design and clinical use of a rotational phantom for dosimetric verification of IMRT/VMAT treatment plans using radiochromic film.MethodsA solid water cylindrical phantom was designed with separable upper and lower halves and rests on plastic bearings allowing for 360° rotation about its central axis. The phantom accommodates a half sheet of radiochromic film, and by rotating the cylinder, the film can be placed in any plane between coronal and sagittal. Calculated dose planes coinciding with rotated film measurements are exported by rotating the CT image and dose distribution within the treatment planning system. The process is illustrated with 2 rotated film measurements of an SRS treatment plan involving 4 separate targets. Additionally, 276 patient specific QA measurements were obtained with the phantom and analyzed with a 2%/2 mm gamma criterion.ResultsThe average 2%/2 mm gamma passing rate for all 276 plans was 99.3%. Seventy-two of the 276 plans were measured with the plane of the film rotated between the coronal and sagittal planes and had an average passing rate of 99.4%.ConclusionsThe rotational phantom allows for accurate film measurements in any plane. With this technique, regions of a dose distribution which might otherwise require multiple sagittal or coronal measurements can be verified with as few as a single measurement. This increases efficiency and, in combination with the high spatial resolution inherent to film dosimetry, makes the rotational technique an attractive option for patient-specific QA.     

Beam rate influence on dose distribution and fluence map in IMRT dynamic technique

AimTo examine the impact of beam rate on dose distribution in IMRT plans and then to evaluate agreement of calculated and measured dose distributions for various beam rate values.BackgroundAccelerators used in radiotherapy utilize some beam rate modes which can shorten irradiation time and thus reduce ability of patient movement during a treatment session. This aspect should be considered in high conformal dynamic techniques.Materials and methodsDose calculation was done for two different beam rates (100 MU/min and 600 MU/min) in an IMRT plan. For both, a comparison of Radiation Planning Index (RPI) and MU was conducted. Secondly, the comparison of optimal fluence maps and corresponding actual fluence maps was done. Next, actual fluence maps were measured and compared with the calculated ones. Gamma index was used for that assessment. Additionally, positions of each leaf of the MLC were controlled by home made software.ResultsDose distribution obtained for lower beam rates was slightly better than for higher beam rates in terms of target coverage and risk structure protection. Lower numbers of MUs were achieved in 100 MU/min plans than in 600 MU/min plans. Actual fluence maps converted from optimal ones demonstrated more similarity in 100 MU/min plans. Better conformity of the measured maps to the calculated ones was obtained when a lower beam rate was applied. However, these differences were small. No correlation was found between quality of fluence map conversion and leaf motion accuracy.ConclusionExecution of dynamic techniques is dependent on beam rate. However, these differences are minor. Analysis shows a slight superiority of a lower beam rate. It does not significantly affect treatment accuracy.     

Full Monte Carlo and measurement-based overall performance assessment of improved clinical implementation of eMC algorithm with emphasis on lower energy range

New version 13.6.23 of the electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm in Varian Eclipse™ treatment planning system has a model for 4 MeV electron beam and some general improvements for dose calculation. This study provides the first overall accuracy assessment of this algorithm against full Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for electron beams from 4 MeV to 16 MeV with most emphasis on the lower energy range. Beams in a homogeneous water phantom and clinical treatment plans were investigated including measurements in the water phantom. Two different material sets were used with full MC: (1) the one applied in the eMC algorithm and (2) the one included in the Eclipse™ for other algorithms. The results of clinical treatment plans were also compared to those of the older eMC version 11.0.31. In the water phantom the dose differences against the full MC were mostly less than 3% with distance-to-agreement (DTA) values within 2 mm. Larger discrepancies were obtained in build-up regions, at depths near the maximum electron ranges and with small apertures. For the clinical treatment plans the overall dose differences were mostly within 3% or 2 mm with the first material set. Larger differences were observed for a large 4 MeV beam entering curved patient surface with extended SSD and also in regions of large dose gradients. Still the DTA values were within 3 mm. The discrepancies between the eMC and the full MC were generally larger for the second material set. The version 11.0.31 performed always inferiorly, when compared to the 13.6.23.     

Comparison of patient-specific intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance for the prostate across multiple institutions

AimTo evaluate the success of a patient-specific intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) practice for prostate cancer patients across multiple institutions using a questionnaire survey.BackgroundThe IMRT QA practice involves different methods of dose distribution verification and analysis at different institutions.Materials and MethodsTwo full-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan and 7 fixed-gantry IMRT plan with DMLC were used for patient specific QA across 22 institutions. The same computed tomography image and structure set were used for all plans. Each institution recalculated the dose distribution with fixed monitor units and without any modification. Single-point dose measurement with a cylindrical ionization chamber and dose distribution verification with a multi-detector or radiochromic film were performed, according to the QA process at each institution.ResultsTwenty-two institutions performed the patient-specific IMRT QA verifications. With a single-point dose measurement at the isocenter, the average difference between the calculated and measured doses was 0.5 ± 1.9%. For the comparison of dose distributions, 18 institutions used a two or three-dimensional array detector, while the others used Gafchromic film. In the γ test with dose difference/distance-to-agreement criteria of 3%?3 mm and 2%?2 mm with a 30% dose threshold, the median gamma pass rates were 99.3% (range: 41.7%–100.0%) and 96.4% (range: 29.4%–100.0%), respectively.ConclusionThis survey was an informative trial to understand the verification status of patient-specific IMRT QA measurements for prostate cancer. In most institutions, the point dose measurement and dose distribution differences met the desired criteria.     

Patient-specific quality assurance and plan dose errors on breast intensity-modulated proton therapy

PurposeTo investigate, in proton therapy, whether the Gamma passing rate (GPR) is related to the patient dose error and whether MU scaling can improve dose accuracy.MethodsAmong 20 consecutively treated breast patients selected for analysis, two IMPT plans were retrospectively generated: (1) the pencil-beam (PB) plan and (2) the Monte Carlo (MC) plan. Patient-specific QA was performed. A 3%/3-mm Gamma analysis was conducted to compare the TPS-calculated PB algorithm dose distribution with the measured 2D dose. Dose errors were compared between the plans that passed the Gamma testing and those that failed. The MU was then scaled to obtain a better GPR. MU-scaled PB plan dose errors were compared to the original PB plan.ResultsOf the 20 PB plans, 8 were passed Gamma testing (G_pass_group) and 12 failed (G_fail_group). Surprisingly, the G_pass_group had a greater dose error than the G_fail_group. The median (range) of the PTV DVH RMSE and PTV ΔDmean were 1.36 (1.00–1.91) Gy vs 1.18 (1.02–1.80) Gy and 1.23 (0.92–1.71) Gy vs 1.10 (0.87–1.49) Gy for the G_pass_group and the G_fail_group, respectively. MU scaling reduced overall dose error. However, for PTV D99 and D95, MU scaling worsened some cases.ConclusionFor breast IMPT, the PB plans that passed the Gamma testing did not show smaller dose errors compared to the plans that failed. For individual plans, the MU scaling technique leads to overall smaller dose errors. However, we do not suggest use of the MU scaling technique to replace the MC plans when the MC algorithm is available.     

A protocol for absolute dose verification of SBRT/SRS treatment plans using Gafchromic™ EBT-XD films

PurposeTo provide a practical protocol for absolute dose verification of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment plans, based on our clinical experience. It aims to be a concise summary of the main aspects to be considered when establishing an accurate film dosimetry system.MethodsProcedures for film calibration and conversion to dose are described for a dosimetry system composed of Gafchromic™ EBT-XD films and a flatbed document scanner. Factors that affect the film-scanner response are also reviewed and accounted for. The accuracy of the proposed methodology was assessed by taking a set of strips irradiated to known doses and its applicability is illustrated for ten SBRT/SRS treatment plans. The film response was converted to dose using red and triple channel dosimetry. The agreement between the planned and measured dose distributions was evaluated using global gamma analysis with criteria of 3%/2mm 10% threshold (TH), 2%/2mm 10% TH, and 2%/2mm 20% TH.ResultsThe differences between the expected and determined doses from the strips analysis were 0.9 ± 0.6% for the red channel and 1.1 ± 0.7% for the triple channel method. Regarding the SBRT/SRS plans verification, the mean gamma passing rates were 99.5 ± 1.0% vs 99.6 ± 1.0% (3%/2mm 10% TH), 96.9 ± 3.5% vs 99.1 ± 1.3% (2%/2mm 10% TH) and 98.4 ± 1.8% vs 98.8 ± 1.5% (2%/2mm 20% TH) for red and triple channel dosimetry, respectively.ConclusionsThe proposed protocol allows for accurate absolute dose verification of SBRT/SRS treatment plans, applying both single and triple channel methods. It may work as a guide for users that intend to implement a film dosimetry system.     

In phantom assessment of superficial doses under TomoTherapy irradiation

PurposeAim of this work is the assessment of build-up and superficial doses of different clinical Head&Neck plans delivered with Helical TomoTherapy (HT) (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA). Depth dose profiles and superficial dose points were measured in order to evaluate the Treatment Planning System (TPS) capability of an accurate dose modeling in regions of disequilibrium. Geometries and scattering conditions were investigated, similar to the ones generally encountered in clinical treatments.MethodsMeasurements were performed with two dosimeters: Gafchromic® EBT3 films (Ashland Inc., Wayne, NJ) and a synthetic single crystal diamond detector (PTW-Frieburg microDiamond, MD). A modified version of the Alderson RANDO phantom was employed to house the detectors. A comparison with TPS data was carried out in terms of dose difference (DD) and distance-to-agreement (DTA).ResultsDD between calculated data and MD measurements are within 4% even in points with high spatial dose variation. For depth profiles, EBT3 data show a DDmax of 3.3% and DTAmax of 2.2 mm, in low and high gradient regions, respectively, and compare well with MD data. EBT3 superficial points always results in measured doses lower than TPS evaluated ones, with a maximum DTA value of 1.5 mm.ConclusionsDoses measured with the two devices are in good agreement and compare well with calculated data. The deviations found in the present work are within the reference tolerance level, suggesting that the HT TPS is capable of a precise dose estimation both in superficial regions and in correspondence with interfaces between air and PMMA.     

Dose delivery accuracy on helical tomotherapy for 4-dimensional tumor motion — a phantom study

BackgroundThe advances in image guidance and capability of highly conformal dose deliveries made possible the use of helical tomotherapy (HT) for lung cancer treatment. To determine the effect of respiratory motion on the delivered dose in HT, film dosimetry using a dynamic phantom was performed. This was a phantom study to determine the effect of motion on the delivered dose in HT.Materials and methods4D computed tomography (4DCT) was acquired for various target motions of CIRS dynamic phantom (CIRS Inc., Norfolk, USA) with 2.5cm diameter spherical target of volume 8.2 cc moving in the COS⁴ motion pattern. AveIP images and treatment plans were generated in the HT planning system. Target excursions during treatment delivery were changed in the superior-inferior, anteroposterior and lateral directions. The breathing cycle time was varied from 4 to 5 sec. and also the delivery interruptions were introduced. A film was exposed for each delivery and gamma analysis was performed.ResultsThe gamma pass rate (GPR) with 3%, 2 mm criteria for the target motion in the S-I direction showed a significant reduction from 97.5% to 54.4% as the motion increased from 3 mm to 8 mm (p = 0.03). For the target motion in S-I = 8 mm, L-R = A-P = 3 mm, the percentage decrease in the GPR was 74% (p = 0.001) for three interruptions.ConclusionThe ITV based approach in HT is ideal for a shallow breathing situation when the tumor excursions were confined to 5 mm in the S-I and 3 mm in L-R and A-P directions.     

3D-printed applicators for high dose rate brachytherapy: Dosimetric assessment at different infill percentage

PurposeDosimetric assessment of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy applicators, printed in 3D with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) at different infill percentage.Materials and methodsA low-cost, desktop, 3D printer (Hamlet 3DX100, Hamlet, Dublin, IE) was used for manufacturing simple HDR applicators, reproducing typical geometries in brachytherapy: cylindrical (common in vaginal treatment) and flat configurations (generally used to treat superficial lesions). Printer accuracy was investigated through physical measurements. The dosimetric consequences of varying the applicator’s density by tuning the printing infill percentage were analysed experimentally by measuring depth dose profiles and superficial dose distribution with Gafchromic EBT3 films (International Specialty Products, Wayne, NJ). Dose distributions were compared to those obtained with a commercial superficial applicator.ResultsMeasured printing accuracy was within 0.5 mm. Dose attenuation was not sensitive to the density of the material. Surface dose distribution comparison of the 3D printed flat applicators with respect to the commercial superficial applicator showed an overall passing rate greater than 94% for gamma analysis with 3% dose difference criteria, 3 mm distance-to-agreement criteria and 10% dose threshold.ConclusionLow-cost 3D printers are a promising solution for the customization of the HDR brachytherapy applicators. However, further assessment of 3D printing techniques and regulatory materials approval are required for clinical application.     

Ultrasound-guided intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy: A phantom study

PurposeTo develop the method for ultrasound (US)-guided intra-operative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT).MethodsWe first established the simulation, planning, and delivery methods for US-guided IOERT and constructed appropriate hardware (the multi-function applicator, accessories, and US phantom). We tested our US-guided IOERT method using this hardware and the Monte Carlo simulation IOERT treatment planning system (TPS). The IOERT TPS used a compensator to build the conformal dose distribution. Then, we used the TPS to evaluate the effect of setup uncertainty on target coverage by introducing phantom setup error ranging from 0 mm to 10 mm to the plans with and without the compensator.ResultsThe simulation, planning, and delivery methods for US-guided IOERT were introduced and validated on a phantom. A complete technique for US-guided IOERT was established. Target coverage decreased by about 12% and 29% as the phantom setup error increased to 5 mm and 10 mm for the plans with compensator, respectively. Without compensator, the corresponding target coverage decreases were 2% and 13%, respectively.ConclusionIn our study, we developed the multi-function applicator, US Phantom, and TPS for IOERT. The procedures included not only dose distribution planning, but also intraoperative US imaging, which provided the information necessary during surgery to improve IOERT quality assurance. Target coverage was more sensitive to setup errors with compensator compared to no compensator. Further studies are needed to validate the clinical efficacy of this US-guided IOERT method.     

3D-printed patient-specific pelvis phantom for dosimetry measurements for prostate stereotactic radiotherapy with dominant intraprostatic lesion boost

AimDeveloping and assessing the feasibility of using a three-dimensional (3D) printed patient-specific anthropomorphic pelvis phantom for dose calculation and verification for stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) with dose escalation to the dominant intraprostatic lesions.Material and methodsA 3D-printed pelvis phantom, including bone-mimicking material, was fabricated based on the computed tomography (CT) images of a prostate cancer patient. To compare the extent to which patient and phantom body and bones overlapped, the similarity Dice coefficient was calculated. Modular cylindrical inserts were created to encapsulate radiochromic films and ionization chamber for absolute dosimetry measurements at the location of prostate and at the boost region. Gamma analysis evaluation with 2%/2mm criteria was performed to compare treatment planning system calculations and measured dose when delivering a 10 flattening filter free (FFF) SABR plan and a 10FFF boost SABR plan.ResultsDice coefficients of 0.98 and 0.91 were measured for body and bones, respectively, demonstrating agreement between patient and phantom outlines. For the boost plans the gamma analysis yielded 97.0% of pixels passing 2%/2mm criteria and these results were supported by the chamber average dose difference of 0.47 ± 0.03%. These results were further improved when overriding the bone relative electron density: 97.3% for the 2%/2mm gamma analysis, and 0.05 ± 0.03% for the ionization chamber average dose difference.ConclusionsThe modular patient-specific 3D-printed pelvis phantom has proven to be a highly attractive and versatile tool to validate prostate SABR boost plans using multiple detectors.     

Assessment of monitor unit limiting strategy using volumetric modulated arc therapy for cancer of hypopharynx

PurposeTo quantify relative merit of MU deprived plans against freely optimized plans in terms of plan quality and report changes induced by progressive resolution optimizer algorithm (PRO3) to the dynamic parameters of RapidArc.Materials and methodsTen cases of carcinoma hypopharynx were retrospectively planned in three phases without using MU tool. Replicas of these baseline plans were reoptimized using “Intermediate dose” feature and “MU tool” to reduce MUs by 20%, 35%, and 50%. Overall quality indices for target and OAR, integral dose, dose-volume spread were assessed. All plans were appraised for changes induced in RapidArc dynamic parameters and pre-treatment quality assurance (QA).ResultsWith increasing MU reduction strength (MURS), MU/Gy values reduced, for all phases with an overall range of 8.6–34.7%; mean dose rate decreased among plans of each phase, phase3 plans recorded greater reductions. MURS20% showed good trade-off between MUs and plan quality. Dose-volume spread below 5 Gy was higher for baseline plans while lower between 20 and 35 Gy. Integral dose was lower for MURS0%, not exceeding 1.0%, compared against restrained plans. Mean leaf aperture and control point areas increased systematically, correlated negatively with increasing MURS. Absolute delta dose rate variations were least for MURS0%. MU deprived plans exhibited GAI (>93%), better than MURS0% plans.ConclusionBaseline plans are superior to MU restrained plans. However, MURS20% offers equivalent and acceptable plan quality with mileage of MUs, improved GAI for complex cases. MU tool may be adopted to tailor treatment plans using PRO3.