Image-guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer: Experience in the Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra

PurposeTo evaluate dosimetric and clinical findings of MRI-guided HDR brachytherapy (HDR-B) for cervical carcinoma.Material and methodsAll patients had a CT, MRI and pelvic-paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Treatment: pelvic (+/−)para-aortic3D/IMRT radiotherapy (45 Gy), weekly cisplatin and HDR-B and pelvic node/parametrial boost 60 Gy until interstitial brachytherapy was done. Two implants: 2008–2011: 5 fractions of 6 Gy, 2011: 2016, 4 fractions of 7 Gy. MRI/TAC were done in each implant. The following were defined: GTV, CTH-HR, CTV-IR; OAR: rectum, bladder and sigmoid.ResultsFrom 2007 to 2016: 57 patients. Patients: T1b2-T2a: 4p, T2b 41p, T3a: 2p; T3B 8p T4a: 2p; N0: 32p, N1 21p, no lymphadenectomy: 4p. Median follow up: 74.6 m (16–122 m), recurrence: 5p local, 6p node, 9p metastasis and 37p without recurrence.Local control 5 years: 90.1%; Ib2-IIB: 94.8%, III-IVa: 72.2%. (p:0.01). RDFS 5y was 92.5%; IB2-IIB: 93%, III: 85% (p:0.024); for pN0: 100%; pN+ iliac-paraaortic: 71.4% (p: 0.007). MFS 5y was 84.1%. Overall survival (OS) at 5y: 66.6% and the cancer specific survival (CEOS) was 74%. Univariate analysis survival: stage Ib2-II 83% vs. III-IVa 41% (p = 0.001); histology: squamous 78%, adenocarcinoma 59.7% (p: ns); lymph node: N0 85% vs. PA+P− 72%, and PA+P+ 35% (p = 0.010). In relation with: HR-CTV dose > 85 Gy, CEOS: 82.5% vs. 77%, and volume CTV-HR < 30 cc: 81.8% and >30 cc: 67%; p: ns. Acute grade 2–3 toxicity: rectal 15.7%, intestinal 15.7% and vesical 15.5%.ConclusionUse of interstitial HDR-BQ guided by RM increased CTV-HR dose and local control, like EMBRACE results. Nodal boost improves RDFS and perhaps OS.     

Peri-operative blood transfusion for resected colon cancer: Practice patterns and outcomes in a population-based study

Background & objectivesLiterature suggests that peri-operative blood transfusion among patients with resected colon cancer may be associated with inferior long-term survival. The study objective was to characterize this association in our population.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry (2002–2008). Pathology reports were obtained for a 25% random sample of all cases and constituted the study population. Log binomial regression was used to identify factors associated with transfusion. Cox proportional hazards model explored the association between transfusion and cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe study population included 7198 patients: 18% stage I, 36% stage II, 40% stage III, and 6% stage IV. Twenty-eight percent of patients were transfused. Factors independently associated with transfusion included advanced age (p < 0.001), female sex (p < 0.001), greater comorbidity (p < 0.001), more advanced disease (p < 0.001) and open surgical resection (p < 0.001). Transfusion was associated with inferior CSS (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.38–1.65) and OS (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.41–1.63), after adjusting for important confounders.ConclusionsPeri-operative transfusion rates among patients with colon cancer have decreased over time. Transfusion is associated with inferior long-term CSS and OS.     

Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable oesophageal cancer: A mono-institutional study on 40 patients

Background/AimTo analyse clinical response, overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) and toxicity in patients with unresectable oesophageal cancer treated by concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT).Materials and methodsForty patients with stage IIa–IVa biopsy proven oesophageal carcinoma were treated with CRT. All patients were studied with endoscopy and CT and judged unresectable after multidisciplinary discussion. CRT consisted of 3 cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m² or carboplatin 300 mg/m² on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m² as a continuous infusion of 96 h associated with concurrent 3D-conformal RT. By using 15 MeV X-rays, a total dose of 60–66 Gy was delivered with daily fractions of 1.8–2.0 Gy.ResultsComplete response (CR), partial response (PR) and no response (NR) were observed in 50%, 20% and 20% of cases, respectively. Of the 20 patients with CR, 15 developed loco-regional recurrent disease. OS and DFS rates at 3 and 5 years were 38%, 8%, 49% and 10%, respectively. Total radiation dose ≥60 Gy improved loco-regional control and complete response (CR vs. PR + NR; p = 0.004) influenced both DFS and loco-regional control. Grade 3 gastrointestinal and haematological acute toxicity occurred in 3/40 patients (7.5%). One patient developed grade 4 renal failure. Late toxicity was reported in 2/40 patients (5.0%), consisting of grade 3 radiation pneumonitis.ConclusionsConcomitant CRT for unresectable oesophageal cancer can result in an acceptable loco-regional control with limited toxicity. Response after treatment and total radiation dose influenced the outcome.     

Analysis of a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) single phase prostate template as a class solution

AimTo assess a class solution template for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer using plan analysis software.BackgroundVMAT is a development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with potential advantages for the delivery of radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer. Class solutions are increasingly used for facilitating RT planning. Plan analysis software provides an objective tool for evaluating class solutions.Materials and methodsThe class solution for VMAT was based on the current static field IMRT template. The plans of 77 prostate cancer patients were evaluated using a set of in-house plan quality metrics (scores) (PlanIQ™, Sun Nuclear Corporation). The metrics compared the class solution for VMAT planning with the IMRT template and the delivered clinical plan (CP). Eight metrics were associated with target coverage and ten with organs-at-risk (OAR). Individual metrics were summed and the combined scores were subjected to non-parametric analysis. The low-dose wash for both static IMRT and VMAT plans were evaluated using 40 Gy and 25 Gy isodose volumes.ResultsVMAT plans were of equal or better quality than the IMRT template and CP for target coverage (combined score) and OAR combined score. The 40 Gy isodose volume was marginally higher with VMAT than IMRT (4.9%) but lower than CP (−6.6%)(P = 0.0074). The 25 Gy volume was significantly lower with VMAT than both IMRT (−32.7%) and CP (−34.4%)(P < 0.00001).ConclusionsAutomated VMAT planning for prostate cancer is feasible and the plans are equal to or better than the current IMRT class solution and the delivered clinical plan.     

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Slovenia, 1990–2003 (results of treatment with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy)

AimTo review the treatment results and identify prognostic factors for disease control and survival in a cohort of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients from a non-endemic population in Slovenia, diagnosed between 1990 and 2003.BackgroundIn Caucasians, nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare malignant tumor. Its diagnosis and treatment are complex and have been dramatically impacted by recent technological advances.Materials and methodsIn the Cancer Registry of Slovenia database, a total of 126 patients with NPC were identified, 93 of whom were available for analysis. All patients were treated with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy (RT) and 29.3% underwent chemotherapy (ChT).ResultsThe median follow-up time for those alive at the last follow-up examination was 74.5 months. Disease recurred locally in 17 patients, regionally in 4 patients and at distant sites in 18 patients, resulting in 5-year locoregional control (LRC), distant failure-free survival (DFFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 73.7%, 78.6% and 59.3%, respectively. Disease-specific survival at 5 years was 59% and overall survival (OS) was 49.7%. In a multivariate analysis, LRC was favorably affected (P < 0.05) by an undifferentiated histology (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.86), DFFS through the absence of neck metastases (HR = 0.28), DFS by younger age (HR = 0.46), and more intensive RT (expressed as the isoeffective dose, EQD_2,T; HR = 2.08). The independent prognosticator for OS was age (≤55 years vs. >55 years, HR = 0.39); in the ≤55 years subgroup, an improved OS was connected to a more intensive RT regimen of EQD_2,T ≥ 66 Gy (HR = 4.17).ConclusionsOur results confirm an independent and favorable effect from an undifferentiated histology, the absence of neck metastases, a younger patient age at diagnosis, and more intensive RT regimens for disease control and survival.     

Evaluating the predictive value of quantec rectum tolerance dose suggestions on acute rectal toxicity in prostate carcinoma patients treated with IMRT

AimTo investigate the predictive value of convenience of rectum dosimetry with Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) dose limits, maximum rectum dose (Dmax), total rectal volume (TVrectum), rectal volume included in PTV (VrectumPTV) on Grade 2–3 acute rectal toxicity for utilization in clinical practice.BackgroundNumerous previous data have reported frequent acute proctitis after external-beam RT of prostate cancer. Predicting toxicity limited with dose information is inadequate in clinical practice due to comorbidities and medications used.Materials and MethodSixty-four non-metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT were enrolled. Patients were treated to a total dose of 70–76 Gy. Rectal dose volume histograms (DVH) of all patients were evaluated retrospectively, and a QUANTEC Score between 0 and 5 was calculated for each patient. The correlation between the rectal DVH data, QUANTEC score, TVrectum, VrectumPTV, rectum Dmax and Grade 2–3 rectal toxicity was investigated.ResultsIn the whole group grade 1, 2 and 3 acute rectal toxicities were 25%, 18.8% and 3.1%, respectively. In the DVH data, rectum doses of all patients were under RTOG dose limits. Statistically significant correlation was found between grade 2–3 rectal toxicity and TVrectum (p = 0,043); however. It was not correlated with QUANTEC score, VrectumPTV and Dmax.ConclusionOur results were not able to show any significant correlation between increasing convenience with QUANTEC limits and lower rectal toxicity. Conclusively, new dosimetric definitions are warranted to predict acute rectal toxicity more accurately in prostate cancer patients during IMRT treatment.     

Biochemical relapse free survival rate in patients with prostate cancer treated with external radiotherapy: outcomes obtained at the CMN Siglo XXI Hospital de Oncología,CMN 20 de Noviembre and Hospital General de México of the México City

AimBiochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rate is determined by a cohort of Mexican patients (n = 595) with prostate cancer who received treatment with external radiotherapy.BackgroundPatients with prostate cancer were collected from CMN Siglo XXI (IMSS), CMN 20 de Noviembre (ISSSTE), and Hospital General de México (HGM). For the IMSS, 173 patients that are treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and 250 with SBRT, for the ISSSTE 57 patients are treated with 3D-CRT and on the HGM 115 patients are managed with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The percentage of patients by risk group is: low 11.1%, intermediate 35.1% and high 53.8%. The average follow-up is 39 months, and the Phoenix criterion was used to determine the bRFS.Materials and methodsThe Kaplan–Meier technique for the construction of the survival curves and, the Cox proportional hazards to model the cofactors.Results(a) The bRFS rates obtained are 95.9% for the SBRT (7 Gy fx, IMSS), 94.6% for the 3D-CRT (1.8 Gy fx, IMSS), 91.3% to the 3D-CRT (2.65 Gy fx, IMSS), 89.1% for the SBRT (7.25 Gy fx, IMSS), 88.7% for the IMRT (1.8 Gy fx, HGM) %, and 87.7% for the 3D-CRT (1.8 Gy fx, ISSSTE). (b) There is no statistically significant difference in the bRFS rates by fractionation scheme, c) Although the numerical difference in the bRFS rate per risk group is 95.5%, 93.8% and 89.1% for low, intermediate and high risk, respectively, these are not statistically significant.ConclusionsThe RT techniques for the treatment of PCa are statistically equivalent with respect to the bRFS rate. This paper confirms that the bRFS rates of Mexican PCa patients who were treated with conventional vs. hypofractionated schemes do not differ significantly.     

Dosimetric impact on changes in target volumes during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background and purposeTo assess anatomic changes during intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and to determine its dosimetric impact.Patients and methodsTwenty patients treated with IMRT for NPC were enrolled in this study. A second CT was performed at 38 Gy. Manual contouring of the macroscopic tumor volumes (GTV) and the planning target volumes (PTV) were done on the second CT. We recorded the volumes of the different structures, D98 %, the conformity, and the homogeneity indexes for each PTV. Volume percent changes were calculated.ResultsWe observed a significant reduction in tumor volumes (58.56 % for the GTV N and 29.52 % for the GTV T). It was accompanied by a significant decrease in the D98 % for the 3 PTV (1.4 Gy for PTV H, p = 0.007; 0.3 Gy for PTV I, p = 0.03 and 1.15 Gy for PTV L, p = 0 0.0066). In addition, we observed a significant reduction in the conformity index in the order of 0.02 (p = 0.001) and 0.01 (p = 0.007) for PTV H and PTV I, respectively. The conformity variation was not significant for PTV L. Moreover, results showed a significant increase of the homogeneity index for PTV H (+ 0.03, p = 0.04) and PTV L (+ 0.04, p = 0.01).ConclusionTumor volume reduction during the IMRT of NPC was accompanied by deterioration of the dosimetric coverage for the different target volumes. It is essential that a careful adaptation of the treatment plan be considered during therapy for selected patients.     

Postoperative endometrial carcinoma treated with external beam irradiation plus vaginal-cuff brachytherapy. Is there a dose relationship with G2 vaginal complications?

AimTo analyse the possible relationship between the EQD2_(α/β=3Gy) at 2 cm³ of the vagina and late toxicity in vaginal-cuff-brachytherapy (VBT) after external-beam-irradiation (EBRT) for postoperative endometrial carcinoma (EC).Materials and methodsFrom 2014 to 2016, 62 postoperative EC patients were treated with EBRT + VBT. The median EBRT dose was 45 Gy (44 Gy–50.4 Gy). VBT involved a single 7 Gy dose. Toxicity was prospectively evaluated using the RTOG score for the rectum and bladder and the objective LENT-SOMA criteria for the vagina. EQD2_{(α/β = 3Gy)} at 2 cm³ of the most exposed part of the vagina was calculated by the sum of the EBRT + VBT dose. Statistics: Boxplot, Student’s t and Chi-square tests and ROC curves.ResultsMean follow-up: 39.2 months (15–68). Late toxicity: bladder:0 patient; rectum:2 patients-G1; Vagina: 26 patients-17G1, 9G2; median EQD2_(α/β=3Gy) at 2 cm³ in G0-G1 patients was 70.4 Gy(SD2.36), being 72.5 Gy(SD2.94) for G2p. The boxplot suggested a cut-point identifying the absence of G2: 100 % of G2p received >68 Gy, ROC curves showed an area under the curve of 0.72 (sensitivity of 1 and specificity of 0.15).ConclusionsDoses >68 Gy EQD2_(α/β=3Gy) at 2 cm³ to the most exposed area of the vagina were associated with late G2 vaginal toxicity in postoperative EC patients treated with EBRT + VBT suggesting a very good dose limit to eliminate the risk of G2 late toxicity. The specificity obtained indicates the need for prospective analyses.     

NTCP modeling analysis of acute hematologic toxicity in whole pelvic radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies – A dosimetric comparison of IMRT and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT)

PurposeThis treatment planning study was conducted to determine whether spot scanning proton beam therapy (SSPT) reduces the risk of grade ⩾3 hematologic toxicity (HT3+) compared with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for postoperative whole pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT).Methods and materialsThe normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the risk of HT3+ was used as an in silico surrogate marker in this analysis. IMRT and SSPT plans were created for 13 gynecologic malignancy patients who had received hysterectomies. The IMRT plans were generated using the 7-fields step and shoot technique. The SSPT plans were generated using anterior-posterior field with single field optimization. Using the relative biological effectives (RBE) value of 1.0 for IMRT and 1.1 for SSPT, the prescribed dose was 45 Gy(RBE) in 1.8 Gy(RBE) per fractions for 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). The homogeneity index (HI) and the conformity index (CI) of the PTV were also compared.ResultsThe bone marrow (BM) and femoral head doses using SSPT were significantly lower than with IMRT. The NTCP modeling analysis showed that the risk of HT3+ using SSPT was significantly lower than with IMRT (NTCP = 0.04 ± 0.01 and 0.19 ± 0.03, p = 0.0002, respectively). There were no significant differences in the CI and HI of the PTV between IMRT and SSPT (CI = 0.97 ± 0.01 and 0.96 ± 0.02, p = 0.3177, and HI = 1.24 ± 0.11 and 1.27 ± 0.05, p = 0.8473, respectively).ConclusionThe SSPT achieves significant reductions in the dose to BM without compromising target coverage, compared with IMRT. The NTCP value for HT3+ in SSPT was significantly lower than in IMRT.     

The role of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in breast-conserving therapy: Long-term results of the Hungarian National Institute of Oncology

AimTo report the long-term results of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) boost for breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy.Materials and methodsBetween 1995 and 2007, 100 early-stage breast cancer patients received an HDR BT boost after conservative surgery and whole breast irradiation. Ten patients (10%) received a single-fraction HDR boost of 8–10.35 Gy using rigid needles, while 90 (90%) were treated with a fractionated multi-catheter HDR BT boost. The latter consisted of 3 × 4 Gy (n = 19), 3 × 4.75 Gy (n = 70), and 2 × 6.4 Gy (n = 1). Breast cancer related events, cosmetic results and side effects were assessed.ResultsAt a median follow-up time of 94 months (range: 8–152) only 7 (7%) ipsilateral breast failures were observed for a 5- and 8-year actuarial rate of 4.5 and 7.0%, respectively. The 8-year disease-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival was 76.1, 82.8, and 80.4%, respectively. Cosmetic outcome was rated excellent in 17%, good in 39%, fair in 33%, and poor in 11%. Data on late radiation side effects were available for 91 patients (91%). Grade 3 fibrosis and grade 3 telangiectasia occurred in 6 (6.6%) and 2 (2.2%) patients, respectively. In univariate analysis only positive margin status had a significant negative effect on local control.ConclusionsHDR BT boost using multi-catheter implants produce excellent long-term local tumour control with acceptable cosmetic outcome and low rate of grade 3 late radiation side effects.     

A study on conventional IMRT and RapidArc treatment planning techniques for head and neck cancers

AimTo evaluate the performance of volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc against conventional IMRT for head and neck cancers.BackgroundRapidArc is a novel technique that has recently been made available for clinical use. Planning study was done for volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc against conventional IMRT for head and neck cancers.Materials and methodsTen patients with advanced tumors of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx were selected for the planning comparison study. PTV was delineated for two different dose levels and planning was done by means of simultaneously integrated boost technique. A total dose of 70 Gy was delivered to the boost volume (PTV boost) and 57.7 Gy to the elective PTV (PTV elective) in 35 equal treatment fractions. PTV boost consisted of the gross tumor volume and lymph nodes containing visible macroscopic tumor or biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes, whereas the PTV elective consisted of elective nodal regions. Planning was done for IMRT using 9 fields and RapidArc with single arc, double arc. Beam was equally placed for IMRT plans. Single arc RapidArc plan utilizes full 360° gantry rotation and double arc consists of 2 co-planar arcs of 360° in clockwise and counter clockwise direction. Collimator was rotated from 35 to 45° to cover the entire tumor, which reduced the tongue and groove effect during gantry rotation. All plans were generated with 6 MV X-rays for CLINAC 2100 Linear Accelerator. Calculations were done in the Eclipse treatment planning system (version 8.6) using the AAA algorithm.ResultsDouble arc plans show superior dose homogeneity in PTV compared to a single arc and IMRT 9 field technique. Target coverage was almost similar in all the techniques. The sparing of spinal cord in terms of the maximum dose was better in the double arc technique by 4.5% when compared to the IMRT 9 field and single arc techniques. For healthy tissue, no significant changes were observed between the plans in terms of the mean dose and integral dose. But RapidArc plans showed a reduction in the volume of the healthy tissue irradiated at V_15 Gy (5.81% for single arc and 4.69% for double arc) and V_20 Gy (7.55% for single arc and 5.89% for double arc) dose levels when compared to the 9-Field IMRT technique. For brain stem, maximum dose was similar in all the techniques. The average MU (±SD) needed to deliver the dose of 200 cGy per fraction was 474 ± 80 MU and 447 ± 45 MU for double arc and single arc as against 948 ± 162 MU for the 9-Field IMRT plan. A considerable reduction in maximum dose to the mandible by 6.05% was observed with double arc plan. Double arc shows a reduction in the parotid mean dose when compared with single arc and IMRT plans.ConclusionRapidArc using double arc provided a significant sparing of OARs and healthy tissue without compromising target coverage compared to IMRT. The main disadvantage with IMRT observed was higher monitor units and longer treatment time.     

Hippocampal dose during Linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: An observational study

IntroductionAim of the present study is to evaluate homolateral and contralateral hippocampus (H-H, C-H, respectively) dose during Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (FSRT) or Radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM).Materials & methodsPatients with BM < 5, size ≤ 30 mm, KPS ≥ 80 and a life expectancy > 3 months, were considered for SRS/FSRT (total dose 15–30 Gy, 1–5 fractions). For each BM, a Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plan was generated with one or two arcs. Hippocampi were not considered during optimizations phase and were contoured and evaluated retrospectively in terms of dose: the Dmedian, Dmean, D0.1cc and the V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy were analyzed.ResultsFrom April 2014 to December 2015, 81 BM were treated with FFF-FSRT/SRS. For the H-H, the average values of Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1cc were 1.5Gy, 1.54Gy and 2.2Gy, respectively, while the V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy values were 25%, 8.9%, 8.9% and 2.1%, respectively. For the C–H, the average Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1 cc were 0.7Gy, 0.7Gy, 0.9Gy, respectively, while the average values of V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy were 18%, 10.2%, 2.8% and 1.4%, respectively. Tumor dimension, tumor cranial-caudal length and the distance between BM and H-H were correlated to Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1cc. For C-H, only the distance from PTV was correlated with a dose reduction.ConclusionDuring FFF-FSRT/SRS, hippocampus received a negligible dose. Despite its clinical significance is still under evaluation, in patients with a long life expectancy, H-H should be considered during Linac-based FSRT/SRS.     

Malignant pleural mesothelioma incidence and survival in the Republic of Ireland 1994–2009

ObjectiveMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignancy associated with exposure to asbestos. The protracted latent period of MPM means that its incidence has continued to rise across Europe after the introduction of restrictions on asbestos use. In order to obtain a clearer indication of trends in the Republic of Ireland (ROI), incidence and survival were assessed based on all MPM cases reported since the establishment of the National Cancer Registry of Ireland (NCR).MethodsNCR recorded 337 MPM diagnoses in the ROI during 1994–2009. Survival was assessed for all cases diagnosed with adequate follow-up (n = 330). Crude and European age-standardized incidence rates were calculated for all cases and for 4-year periods. A Cox model of observed (all-cause) survival was used to generate hazard ratios for the effect of: gender; age at diagnosis; diagnosis cohort; region of residence; histological type; and tumour stage. Single P-values for the variables indicated were calculated using either a stratified log-rank test or stratified trend test.ResultsOver the study period the age-standardized MPM incidence in the ROI rose from 4.98 cases per million (cpm) to 7.24 cpm. The 1-year survival rate for all MPM cases was 29.6% (CI 24.7–34.6%). Excess mortality risk was associated with age at diagnosis (75–89 yrs vs. 55–64 yrs, HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.35–2.63, P < 0.001) and tumour stage (III vs. I HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.00–2.48, P < 0.05; IV vs. I HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.08–2.21, P < 0.05). Age showed a significant survival trend (P < 0.001) but tumour stage did not (P = 0.150). There was significant heterogeneity between the survival of patients resident in different regions (P = 0.027).ConclusionMPM incidence and mortality continued to rise in the ROI after the restrictions on asbestos use and the predictors of survival detected in this study are broadly consistent with those identified for other countries.     

Post-chemotherapy target volumes are safe as boost volume for intact breast radiotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer

PurposeThe purpose of our study is to evaluate the challenges in identification of postoperative complexes (POC), the utility of clips in delineation of clinical target volume for boost in LABC downstaged with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and to correlate this with patterns of recurrence.Methods and materialsLABC patients who underwent NACT followed by BCS and radiotherapy (2007–2014) were the subject of our analysis. The data on visibility and characteristics of postoperative cavity (POC), concordance of its volume with clip volume on radiation planning scan were retrieved. A 1 cm margin beyond POC was delineated as a clinical target volume (CTV). Postoperative whole breast and supraclavicular radiotherapy (50 Gy/25fractions/5wk or 42.4 Gy/16#/3 wk) followed by boost (10−16 Gy/5-8#/1–1.5wk) were delivered. Patterns of recurrence were evaluated.ResultsOut of 60 patients, 28.3% patients had stage II disease and 71.7% had stage III disease. 25% patients achieved pathological CR (complete response). The median POC volume was 30 cc and the median clip volume was 40 cc. The concordance of POC volume with clip volume was seen in 80%. Clips served as a good surrogate for POC in 80% of patients. At a median follow-up of 65 months (IQ range 32–84 months), and a lost to follow-up rate of 11.6 %, 3.3% (n = 2) patients had local recurrence (LR) and 8.3% (n = 5) had regional recurrence (LRR) in the supraclavicular region.ConclusionsDelineation of post NACT excision cavity as POC for boost radiotherapy is safe. Clips serve as a good surrogate for CTV delineation in 75% patients.     

Luminal (Her2 negative) prognostic index and survival of breast cancer patients

PurposeThe group of luminal (Her2 negative) is distinguished from other subtypes of breast cancer. We aimed to produce a prognostic index specific for luminal (Her2 negative) subtype breast cancer that could assist clinical treatment.MethodsThe test set comprised 406 consecutive luminal (Her2 negative) breast cancer patients. The relationship of 11 clinicopathologic factors including survivin with the 5-year disease-free survival was analyzed.ResultsIn univariate analysis, TNM stage, surgery, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and survivin expression were prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, tumor size [HR (95% CI): 1.98 (1.12–3.49), p = 0.019], the number of lymph node metastasis [HR (95% CI): 1.75 (1.33–2.29), p < 0.0001] and the expression of progesterone receptor [HR (95% CI): 0.58 (0.36–0.95), p = 0.029] can independently predict prognosis. Prognostic index (PI) was calculated as 0.68 × tumor size + 0.56 × the number of lymph node metastasis − 0.54 × PR. According to the PI, patients were categorized into three groups: low, middle, and high risk group with the 5-year disease-free survival rates of 91.91%, 84.97% and 70.47%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the validation set, the luminal prognostic index (LPI) remained significant.ConclusionThe LPI may be a useful tool for evaluating the outcome of patients with luminal (Her-2 negative) breast cancer.