Learned odor discrimination in Drosophila without combinatorial odor maps in the antennal lobe

A unifying feature of mammalian and insect olfactory systems is that olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) expressing the same unique odorant-receptor gene converge onto the same glomeruli in the brain [1-7]. Most odorants activate a combination of receptors and thus distinct patterns of glomeruli, forming a proposed combinatorial spatial code that could support discrimination between a large number of odorants [8-11]. OSNs also exhibit odor-evoked responses with complex temporal dynamics [11], but the contribution of this activity to behavioral odor discrimination has received little attention [12]. Here, we investigated the importance of spatial encoding in the relatively simple Drosophila antennal lobe. We show that Drosophila can learn to discriminate between two odorants with one functional class of Or83b-expressing OSNs. Furthermore, these flies encode one odorant from a mixture and cross-adapt to odorants that activate the relevant OSN class, demonstrating that they discriminate odorants by using the same OSNs. Lastly, flies with a single class of Or83b-expressing OSNs recognize a specific odorant across a range of concentration, indicating that they encode odorant identity. Therefore, flies can distinguish odorants without discrete spatial codes in the antennal lobe, implying an important role for odorant-evoked temporal dynamics in behavioral odorant discrimination.     

Natural variation at the Drosophila melanogaster Or22 odorant receptor locus is associated with changes in olfactory behaviour

In insects, many critical olfactory behaviours are mediated by the large odorant receptor (Or) gene family, which determines the response properties of different classes of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs). While ORN responses are generally conserved within and between Drosophila species, variant alleles of the D. melanogaster Or22 locus have previously been shown to alter the response profile of an ORN class called ab3A. These alleles show potential clinal variation, suggesting that selection is acting at this locus. Here, we investigated if the changes seen in ab3A responses lead to changes in olfactory-related behaviours. We show that variation at the Or22 locus and in the ab3A neurons are not fully compensated for by other ORNs and lead to overall changes in antennal odorant detection. We further show that this correlates with differences in odorant preference behaviour and with differences in oviposition site preference, with flies that have the chimaeric short allele strongly preferring to oviposit on banana. These findings indicate that variation at the Or22 locus leads to changes in olfactory-driven behaviours, and add support to the idea that the ab3A neurons are of especial importance to the ecology of Drosophila flies.     

Or83b encodes a broadly expressed odorant receptor essential for Drosophila olfaction

Fruit flies are attracted by a diversity of odors that signal the presence of food, potential mates, or attractive egg-laying sites. Most Drosophila olfactory neurons express two types of odorant receptor genes: Or83b, a broadly expressed receptor of unknown function, and one or more members of a family of 61 selectively expressed receptors. While the conventional odorant receptors are highly divergent, Or83b is remarkably conserved between insect species. Two models could account for Or83b function: it could interact with specific odor stimuli independent of conventional odorant receptors, or it could act in concert with these receptors to mediate responses to all odors. Our results support the second model. Dendritic localization of conventional odorant receptors is abolished in Or83b mutants. Consistent with this cellular defect, the Or83b mutation disrupts behavioral and electrophysiological responses to many odorants. Or83b therefore encodes an atypical odorant receptor that plays an essential general role in olfaction.     

Odorant Receptor Polymorphisms and Natural Variation in Olfactory Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster

Animals perceive and discriminate among a vast array of sensory cues in their environment. Both genetic and environmental factors contribute to individual variation in behavioral responses to these cues. Here, we asked to what extent sequence variants in six Drosophila melanogaster odorant receptor (Or) genes are associated with variation in behavioral responses to benzaldehyde by sequencing alleles from a natural population. Sequence analyses showed signatures of deviations from neutrality for Or42b and Or85f, and linkage disequilibrium analyses showed a history of extensive recombination between polymorphic markers for all six Or genes. We identified polymorphisms in Or10a, Or43a, and Or67b that were significantly associated with variation in response to benzaldehyde. To verify these associations, we repeated the analyses with an independent set of behavioral measurements of responses to a structurally similar odorant, acetophenone. Association profiles for both odorants were similar with many polymorphisms and haplotypes associated with variation in responsiveness to both odorants. Some polymorphisms, however, were associated with one, but not the other odorant. We also observed a correspondence between behavioral response to benzaldehyde and differences in Or10a and Or43a expression. These results illustrate that sequence variants that arise during the evolution of odorant receptor genes can contribute to individual variation in olfactory behavior and give rise to subtle shifts in olfactory perception.RESEARCHERS in many scientific fields have long appreciated that different animal species perceive the world differently. In fact, these differences are so striking that new disciplines have arisen to study the adaptations of sense organs to the environment (e.g., Ali 1978; Lythgoe 1979; Dusenbery 1992). Differences in sensory perception exist not only between species, but also between populations of a single species and between individuals within a population. What is the underlying genetic architecture for individual variation in sensory perception?Olfaction provides an excellent model for examining the underlying genetic mechanisms that result in variation in behavior. In both vertebrates and invertebrates, odorants are detected by families of odorant receptors expressed in populations of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs), whose activation elicits a distinct spatial pattern of glomerular activity in the brain (Buck and Axel 1991; Vassar et al. 1994; Mombaerts et al. 1996; Laissue et al. 1999; Gao et al. 2000; Vosshall et al. 2000; Bhalerao et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2003). This combinatorial code allows for discrimination of a diverse repertoire of odorants.Drosophila melanogaster has a relatively simple olfactory system with only 60 odorant receptor (Or) genes (Vosshall and Stocker 2007) compared to ∼1000 in the mouse (Zhang and Firestein 2002; Zhang et al. 2004). The 60 genes are located throughout the genome, and 2 of these genes are alternatively spliced for a total of 62 identified proteins (Clyne et al. 1999; Gao and Chess 1999; Vosshall et al. 1999; Robertson et al. 2003). Furthermore, clusters of Ors throughout the genome suggest several recent gene duplication events (Robertson et al. 2003).The response spectra of individual ORNs have been extensively characterized using extracellular electrophysiological recordings from single sensilla on the antennae and maxillary palps. Recordings from basiconic sensilla on the antenna identified classes of neurons with distinct olfactory response profiles organized as two to four neurons in each sensillum with specific neuronal combinations occurring in distinct spatial regions of the antenna (de Bruyne et al. 1999, 2001).The majority of ORNs express a unique odorant receptor in addition to the highly conserved coreceptor, Or83b (Jones et al. 2005). Studies of a null mutant of Or83b implicated this receptor in positioning odorant receptor proteins in the sensory dendrites (Larsson et al. 2004; Benton et al. 2006). Odorant receptors in Drosophila have an atypical membrane topology with a cytoplasmic N terminus and an extracellular C terminus (Benton et al. 2006). Specific domains in the third cytoplasmic loops of two odorant receptors, Or22a and Or43a, have been implicated to interact with the third loop of Or83b (Benton et al. 2006). Drosophila odorant receptors act as ligand-gated nonselective cation channels formed by a dimeric complex between a unique Or and the Or83b coreceptor (Sato et al. 2008; Wicher et al. 2008).Several studies have examined ligand specificities of individual odorant receptor proteins and demonstrated that they respond to diverse and overlapping suites of ligands. Response profiles for many receptors have been characterized using the Gal4/UAS system to drive expression of individual odorant receptors in a mutant ORN lacking expression of its endogeneous receptor, followed by electrophysiological recording (Dobritsa et al. 2003; Hallem et al. 2004; Hallem and Carlson 2006). In addition, misexpression studies of Or43a resulted in a reduction of behavioral avoidance responses to benzaldehyde (Stortkuhl et al. 2005). This result combined with electrophysiological recordings from ORNs and heterologous expression in Xenopus oocytes further functionally characterized the odorant response profiles of this receptor (Wetzel et al. 2001) and identified several Or43a ligands, such as fruit- derived odorants benzaldehyde, cyclohexanone, cyclohexanol, and benzyl alcohol (Stortkuhl and Kettler 2001; Hallem et al. 2004).Despite advances in our understanding of odor coding, the molecular mechanisms responsible for variation in olfactory perception remain poorly understood. D. melanogaster is especially amenable to conducting such studies given its quantitatively simple olfactory system and since large numbers of genetically identical individuals can be reared in a common environment and these individuals can be subjected to simple, rapid, and highly reproducible quantitative behavioral assays Anholt and Mackay 2004). Here, we examine how molecular variation in odorant receptors contributes to variation in olfactory behavior in inbred lines derived from a natural population of D. melanogaster. We focused our analyses on six odorant receptors, Or7a, Or10a, Or42b, Or43a, Or67b, and Or85f, which have been shown by electrophysiology (Stortkuhl and Kettler 2001; Hallem et al. 2004; Stortkuhl et al. 2005; Hallem and Carlson 2006), through heterologous expression systems (Wetzel et al. 2001), or by calcium imaging studies (Wang et al. 2003) to respond to benzaldehyde. Significant variation in behavioral responses to benzaldehyde has been observed previously in this population and was normally distributed as is typical for a quantitative trait influenced by multiple genes (Wang et al. 2007). Here, we report associations between olfactory behavior and sequence variants in three Or genes. To validate the reliability of these associations we measured responses to a structurally similar odorant, acetophenone, in the same population, and showed that the associations with variation in responses to both odorants are largely similar with occasional molecular polymorphisms associated with variation in response to only one, but not the other odorant. These observations illustrate how sequence variants that arise during the evolution of Or genes can contribute to individual variation in olfactory behavior, how polymorphisms can give rise to subtle shifts in olfactory perception, and how naturally arising mutations within a population can combine to generate broad individual variation in sensory perception.     

Calmodulin modulates insect odorant receptor function

Insect odorant receptors (ORs) are heteromeric complexes of an odor-specific receptor protein (OrX) and a ubiquitous co-receptor protein (Orco). The ORs operate as non-selective cation channels, also conducting Ca²⁺ ions. The Orco protein contains a conserved putative calmodulin (CaM)-binding motif indicating a role of CaM in its function. Using Ca²⁺ imaging to monitor OR activity we investigated the effect of CaM inhibition on the function of OR proteins. Ca²⁺ responses elicited in Drosophila olfactory sensory neurons by stimulation with the synthetic OR agonist VUAA1 were reduced and prolonged by CaM inhibition with the potent antagonist W7 but not with the weak antagonist W5. A similar effect was observed for Orco proteins heterologously expressed in CHO cells when CaM was inhibited with W7, trifluoperazine or chlorpromazine, or upon overexpression of CaM-EF-hand mutants. With the Orco CaM mutant bearing a point mutation in the putative CaM site (K339N) the Ca²⁺ responses were akin to those obtained for wild type Orco in the presence of W7. There was no uniform effect of W7 on Ca²⁺ responses in CHO cells expressing complete ORs (Or22a/Orco, Or47a/Orco, Or33a/Orco, Or56a/Orco). For Or33a and Or47a we observed no significant effect of W7, while it caused a reduced response in cells expressing Or22a and a shortened response for Or56a.     

Retronasal but not oral-cavity-only identification of "purely olfactory" odorants

Identifications of 5 odorants selected to be nontrigeminal stimuli were compared using retronasal and oral-cavity-only (OCO) air-phase presentations, with OCO produced by both exhalation through the mouth and a nose clip that closed the nostrils. Nine identifiers were available on each trial; 1 or 2 were correct for each odorant. Correct retronasal identifications were more common than OCO identifications and exceeded chance across subjects and for each subject; OCO correct identifications did not exceed chance. Retronasal reaction times were briefer than OCO reaction times. Correct retronasal identifications for vanillin, octanoic acid, phenylethyl alcohol, coumarin, and octane were 88%, 73%, 87%, 70%, and 85%, respectively; correct OCO identifications were, respectively, 10%, 12%, 18%, 35%, and 33%. Identifiers selected for retronasally presented odorants differed from those for other retronasally presented odorants, but identifiers for OCO-presented odorants did not differ between odorants. Overall, the retronasal identifications of nontrigeminal odorants both depended upon the odorant that was presented and corresponded to previous reported orthonasal identifications. In contrast, the OCO identifications, characterized by low percentages of correct identifications and an absence of differences between odorants in selected identifiers, suggested that OCO responses to nontrigeminal, purely olfactory odorants lack sufficient sensory information for either correct or differential identification.     

Improving the odorant sensitivity of olfactory receptor-expressing yeast with accessory proteins

Olfaction depends on the selectivity and sensitivity of olfactory receptors. Previous attempts at constructing a mammalian olfactory receptor-based artificial odorant sensing system in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae suffered from low sensitivity and activity. This result may be at least in part due to poor functional expression of olfactory receptors and/or limited solubility of some odorants in the medium. In this study, we examined the effects of two types of accessory proteins, receptor transporting protein 1 short and odorant binding proteins, in improving odor-mediated activation of olfactory receptors expressed in yeast. We found that receptor transporting protein 1 short enhanced the membrane expression and ligand-induced responses of some olfactory receptors. Coexpression of odorant binding proteins of the silkworm moth Bombyx mori enhanced the sensitivity of a mouse olfactory receptor. Our results suggest that different classes of accessory proteins can confer sensitive and robust responses of olfactory receptors expressed in yeast. Inclusion of accessory proteins may be essential in the future development of practical olfactory receptor-based odorant sensors.     

Odorant-induced hyperpolarization and suppression of cAMP-activated current in newt olfactory receptor neurons

Although many studies have reported that odorants can elicit inhibitory responses as well as excitatory responses in vertebrate olfactory receptor neurons, the cellular mechanisms that underlie this inhibition are unclear. Here we examine the inhibitory effect of odorants on newt olfactory receptor neurons using whole cell patch clamp recording. At high concentrations, odorant stimulation decreased the membrane conductance and inhibited depolarization. Various odorants (anisole, isoamyl acetate, cineole, limonene and isovaleric acid) suppressed the depolarizing current in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, one odorant could suppress the depolarization caused by another odorant. The depolarization caused by isoamyl acetate was inhibited by anisole in cells that were excited by isoamyl acetate but not by anisole. Odorants were able to hyperpolarize cells that were depolarized by cAMP-induced conductance. Given that this inhibitory effect of odorants can affect excitation caused by other odorants, we suggest that it might play a role in coding odorants in olfactory receptor neurons.     

Local interneuron diversity in the primary olfactory center of the moth <Emphasis Type="Italic">Manduca sexta</Emphasis>

Local interneurons (LNs) play important roles in shaping and modulating the activity of output neurons in primary olfactory centers. Here, we studied the morphological characteristics, odor responses, and neurotransmitter content of LNs in the antennal lobe (AL, the insect primary olfactory center) of the moth Manduca sexta. We found that most LNs are broadly tuned, with all LNs responding to at least one odorant. 70% of the odorants evoked a response, and 22% of the neurons responded to all the odorants tested. Some LNs showed excitatory (35%) or inhibitory (33%) responses only, while 33% of the neurons showed both excitatory and inhibitory responses, depending on the odorant. LNs that only showed inhibitory responses were the most responsive, with 78% of the odorants evoking a response. Neurons were morphologically diverse, with most LNs innervating almost all glomeruli and others innervating restricted portions of the AL. 61 and 39% of LNs were identified as GABA-immunoreactive (GABA-ir) and non-GABA-ir, respectively. We found no correlations between odor responses and GABA-ir, neither between morphology and GABA-ir. These results show that, as observed in other insects, LNs are diverse, which likely determines the complexity of the inhibitory network that regulates AL output.     

Spatial organization of antennal olfactory sensory neurons in the female Spodoptera littoralis moth: differences in sensitivity and temporal characteristics

Single-cell recordings from olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), housed in sensilla located at the base and at the tip of the antenna, showed selective responses to plant odors and female sex pheromone in this polyphagous moth. A spatial variation existed in sensitivity: OSNs present on the more proximal segment (P) were more sensitive than those on the more distal segment (D). OSNs of the 2 locations also differed in temporal characteristics: OSNs on P had shorter latency and displayed more phasic responses, whereas those on D had more tonic responses, especially at low stimulus concentrations. The 196 OSNs responding to our 35 monomolecular stimuli in the screening were housed in 32 functional sensillum types: 27 in basiconic, 3 in long-trichoid, 2 in coeloconic, and 3 in auricillic sensilla. The OSNs in basiconic, coeloconic, and auricillic sensilla responded to plant-associated odorants, whereas OSNs in long-trichoid sensilla responded to female-produced sex pheromone components. Short-trichoid sensilla showed spontaneous activity, but no responses to any odorant tested. OSN specificity to plant stimuli ranged from highly specific to broadly tuned, but it did not differ clearly from females in more specialized moths. OSN response diversity is discussed in terms of olfactory coding, behavior, and ecological specialization.     

Regulation of intracellular cyclic GMP levels in olfactory sensory neurons

Cyclic AMP is the primary second messenger mediating odorant signal transduction in mammals. A number of studies indicate that cyclic GMP is also involved in a variety of other olfactory signal transduction processes, including adaptation, neuronal development, and long-term cellular responses in the setting of odorant stimulation. However, the mechanisms that control the production and degradation of cGMP in olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) remain unclear. Here, we investigate these mechanisms using primary cultures of OSNs. We demonstrate that odorants increase cGMP levels in intact OSNs in vitro. Different from the rapid and transient cAMP responses to odorants, the cGMP elevation is both delayed and sustained. Inhibition of soluble guanylyl cyclase and heme oxygenase blocks these odorant-induced cGMP increases, whereas inhibition of cGMP PDEs (phosphodiesterases) increases this response. cGMP PDE activity is increased by odorant stimulation, and is sensitive to both ambient calcium and cAMP concentrations. Calcium stimulates cGMP PDE activity, whereas cAMP and protein kinase A appears to inhibit it. These data demonstrate a mechanism by which odorant stimulation may regulate cGMP levels through the modulation of cAMP and calcium level in OSNs. Such interactions between odorants and second messenger systems may be important to the integration of immediate and long-term responses in the setting odorant stimulation.     

Odor Hedonics: Connection With Emotional Response Estimated by Autonomic Parameters

The aim of this paper is to analyse the relationship betweenself-report hedonic evaluations and the physiological expressionof emotion in response to odorants. We try to solve the followingquestions: (1) Is it possible to find any experimental evidencethat the sense of smell is linked with emotion? (2) What kindof odorants can be distinguished by autonomic analysis? (3)Is there a link between hedonics and autonomic information?The effects of odorants on the emotional process were estimated,in terms of autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity. Fifteensubjects inhaled five odorants as olfactory stimuli: lavender(LAV), ethyl acetoacetate (EAA), camphor (CAM), acetic acid(AA) and butyric acid (BA). After inhaling the odorant, subjectswere requested to fill out an 11-point hedonic scale to rateits pleasantness versus unpleasantness. ANS parameters wereas follows: two electrodermal responses, skin potential (SP)and resistance (SR); two thermovascular parameters, skin bloodflow (SBF) and skin temperature (ST); and two cardiorespiratoryparameters: instantaneous respiratory frequency (IRF) and instantaneousheart rate (IHR). Simultaneous recording of six parameters showedthat specific autonomic patterns were associated with each odorant.An analysis of variance made it possible to differentiate amongthe five odorants. Two-by-two odorant comparisons for autonomicresponses using Tukey's HSD multiple comparison test only permitteddifferentiation between pleasant odorants (LAV and EAA) andunpleasant (AA and BA) ones, but camphor was differentiatedfrom both pleasant and unpleasant odorants. Each odorant elicitedresponses in the different parameters, yet subjects respondedthrough their preferential channels; an average of two channelswas used by each subject. These results when compared with thoseobtained with other senses (visual and auditory). did not evidencethe postulated preferential link between olfaction and emotion.A'strong link between hedonics and ANS response could be demonstratedwhen considering each subject and mainly through his/her preferentialchannel(s); conversely a weak correlation (SR duration excepted)was obtained between inter-subjects' hedonic evaluation. Itseems that for a given population the autonomic response reflectthe odor valence only through some parameters related to themain preferential channel(s) and thus the global autonomic patternhas to be considered. Chem. Senses 22: 237–248, 1997.     

Molecular receptive range variation among mouse odorant receptors for aliphatic carboxylic acids

The ability of mammals to identify and distinguish among many thousands of different odorants suggests a combinatorial use of odorant receptors, with each receptor detecting multiple odorants and each odorant interacting with multiple receptors. Numerous receptors may be devoted to the sampling of particularly important regions of odor space. In this study, we explore the similarities and differences in the molecular receptive ranges of four mouse odorant receptors (MOR23-1, MOR31-4, MOR32-11 and MOR40-4), which have previously been identified as receptors for aliphatic carboxylic acids. Each receptor was expressed in Xenopus oocytes, along with Gα_olf and the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator to allow electrophysiological assay of receptor responses. We find that even though these receptors are relatively unrelated, there is extensive overlap among their receptive ranges. That is, these receptors sample a similar region of odor space. However, the receptive range of each receptor is unique. Thus, these receptors contribute to the depth of coverage of this small region of odor space. Such a group of receptors with overlapping, but distinct receptive ranges, may participate in making fine distinctions among complex mixtures of closely related odorant compounds.     

Identification of second messenger mediating signal transduction in the olfactory receptor cell

One of the biggest controversial issues in the research of olfaction has been the mechanism underlying response generation to odorants that have been shown to fail to produce cAMP when tested by biochemical assays with olfactory ciliary preparations. Such observations are actually the original source proposing a possibility for the presence of multiple and parallel transduction pathways. In this study the activity of transduction channels in the olfactory cilia was recorded in cells that retained their abilities of responding to odorants that have been reported to produce InsP3 (instead of producing cAMP, and therefore tentatively termed "InsP3 odorants"). At the same time, the cytoplasmic cNMP concentration ([cNMP]i) was manipulated through the photolysis of caged compounds to examine their real-time interactions with odorant responses. Properties of responses induced by both InsP3 odorants and cytoplasmic cNMP resembled each other in their unique characteristics. Reversal potentials of currents were 2 mV for InsP3 odorant responses and 3 mV for responses induced by cNMP. Current and voltage (I-V) relations showed slight outward rectification. Both responses showed voltage-dependent adaptation when examined with double pulse protocols. When brief pulses of the InsP3 odorant and cytoplasmic cNMP were applied alternatively, responses expressed cross-adaptation with each other. Furthermore, both responses were additive in a manner as predicted quantitatively by the theory that signal transduction is mediated by the increase in cytoplasmic cAMP. With InsP3 odorants, actually, remarkable responses could be detected in a small fraction of cells ( approximately 2%), explaining the observation for a small production of cAMP in ciliary preparations obtained from the entire epithelium. The data will provide evidence showing that olfactory response generation and adaptation are regulated by a uniform mechanism for a wide variety of odorants.     

Association of polymorphisms in odorant-binding protein genes with variation in olfactory response to benzaldehyde in Drosophila

Adaptive evolution of animals depends on behaviors that are essential for their survival and reproduction. The olfactory system of Drosophila melanogaster has emerged as one of the best characterized olfactory systems, which in addition to a family of odorant receptors, contains an approximately equal number of odorant-binding proteins (OBPs), encoded by a multigene family of 51 genes. Despite their abundant expression, little is known about their role in chemosensation, largely due to the lack of available mutations in these genes. We capitalized on naturally occurring mutations (polymorphisms) to gain insights into their functions. We analyzed the sequences of 13 Obp genes in two chromosomal clusters in a population of wild-derived inbred lines, and asked whether polymorphisms in these genes are associated with variation in olfactory responsiveness. Four polymorphisms in 3 Obp genes exceeded the statistical permutation threshold for association with responsiveness to benzaldehyde, suggesting redundancy and/or combinatorial recognition by these OBPs of this odorant. Model predictions of alternative pre-mRNA secondary structures associated with polymorphic sites suggest that alterations in Obp mRNA structure could contribute to phenotypic variation in olfactory behavior.     

Effects of antibodies against odorant binding proteins on electrophysiological responses to odorants

Monoclonal antibodies against two olfactory mucosal proteins, one with affinity for anisole-like and the other for benzaldehyde-like compounds, were applied to mouse olfactory epithelium. Responses to three odorants (anisole, benzaldehyde and amyl acetate) were measured. Of 26 antibodies, three (12%) inhibited responses only to the odorant with affinity for the antigen, nine (35%) inhibited responses to all three odorants, and 14 (54%) were without effect. None reduced responses by as much as 50%. The data support the hypothesis that there is a class of related proteins in olfactory neuronal cell membranes that function as receptor molecules and that other mechanisms also mediate odorant stimulation.     

Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process

Electrical recording from small twigs of nerve in a tortoise showed that olfactory, vomeronasal, and trigeminal receptors in the nose are responsive to various odorants. No one kind of receptor was most sensitive to all odorants. For controlled stimulation, odorant was caused to appear in a stream of gas already flowing through the nose. Of the parameters definable at the naris, temperature, relative humidity, and nature of inert gas had little effect on olfactory responses to amyl acetate, whereas odorant species, odorant concentration, and volume flow rate effectively determined the responses of all nasal chemoreceptors. An intrinsic variable of accessibility to the receptors, particularly olfactory, was demonstrated. Flow dependence of chemoreceptor responses is thought to reflect the necessity for delivery of odorant molecules to receptor sites. Since the olfactory receptors are relatively exposed, plateauing of the response with flow rate for slightly soluble odorants suggests an approach to concentration equilibrium in the overlying mucus with that in the air entering the naris. Accordingly, data for responses to amyl acetate were fitted with Beidler's (1954) taste equation for two kinds of sites being active. The requirement for finite aqueous solubility, if true, suggests substitution of aqueous solutions for gaseous solutions. A suitable medium was found and results conformed to expectations. Olfactory receptors were insensitive to variation of ionic strength, pH, and osmotic pressure.     

Neural control of olfaction and tentacle movements by serotonin and dopamine in terrestrial snail

We investigated the role of serotonin (5HT) and dopamine (DA) in the regulation of olfactory system function and odor-evoked tentacle movements in the snail Helix. Preparations of the posterior tentacle (including sensory pad, tentacular ganglion and olfactory nerve) or central ganglia with attached posterior tentacles were exposed to cineole odorant and the evoked responses were affected by prior application of 5HT or DA or their precursors 5-hydroxytryptophan (5HTP) and l-DOPA, respectively. 5HT applications decreased cineole-evoked responses recorded in the olfactory nerve and hyperpolarized the identified tentacle retractor muscle motoneuron MtC3, while DA applications led to the opposite changes. 5HTP and l-DOPA modified MtC3 activity comparable to 5HT and DA action. DA was also found to decrease the amplitude of spontaneous local field potential oscillations in the procerebrum, a central olfactory structure. In vivo studies demonstrated that injection of 5HTP in freely moving snails reduced the tentacle withdrawal response to aversive ethyl acetate odorant, whereas the injection of l-DOPA increased responses to “neutral” cineole and aversive ethyl acetate odorants. Our data suggest that 5HT and DA affect the peripheral (sensory epithelium and tentacular ganglion), the central (procerebrum), and the single motor neuron (withdrawal motoneuron MtC3) level of the snail’s nervous system.