Retinoic acid-induced changes in differentiation-defective embryonal carcinoma RAC65 cells.

RAC65 is a mutant clone of mouse embryonal carcinoma cells, P19, which does not undergo terminal differentiation upon treatment with retinoic acid (RA). RAC65 cells express a truncated RA receptor alpha (RAR alpha) which, however, does not fully explain their defect. Here we show that RAC65 cells exhibit an additional defect in RAR alpha mRNA which may reflect a defect in RNA splicing. The parental and mutant cells also differ in their capacities to bind [3H]RA into nuclear fractions and in expression of cellular RA binding protein (CRABP) mRNA after treatment with RA. The combined data suggest that the defect in RAC65 RAR alpha results in reduced expression of the CRABP gene after RA treatment and, therefore, increased flow of RA into the nucleus.     

Cellular Retinoic Acid Binding Protein 2 Is Strikingly Downregulated in Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Functions as a Tumor Suppressor

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant pathotype of esophageal carcinoma (EC) in China, especially in Henan province, with poor prognosis and limited 5-year survival rate. Cellular retinoic acid binding protein 2 (CRABP2) is a member of the retinoic acid (RA) and lipocalin/cytosolic fatty-acid binding protein family and plays a completely contrary role in tumorigenesis through the retinoid signaling pathway, depending on the nuclear RA receptors (RAR) and PPARbeta/delta receptors. Presently, the biological role of CRABP2 in the development of ESCC has never been reported. Here, we firstly evaluated the expression of CRABP2 at both mRNA and protein levels and showed that it was remarkably downregulated in clinical ESCC tissues and closely correlated with the occurrence position, pathology, TNM stage, size, infiltration depth and cell differentiation of the tumor. Additionally, the biological function assays demonstrated that CRABP2 acted as a tumor suppressor in esophageal squamous carcinogenesis by significantly inhibiting cell growth, inducing cell apoptosis and blocking cell metastasis both in vitro and in vivo. All in all, our finding simplicate that CRABP2 is possibly an efficient molecular marker for diagnosing and predicting the development of ESCC.     

Cellular retinoic acid-binding protein II gene expression is directly induced by estrogen,but not retinoic acid,in rat uterus

It has been suggested that cellular retinoic acid-binding protein (II) (CRABP(II)) may have a role in the movement of retinoic acid (RA) to its nuclear receptors, thereby enhancing the action of RA in the cells in which it is expressed. RA has also been shown to increase expression of CRABP(II). Previous work from our laboratory has shown that 17 beta-estradiol (E2) administration to prepubertal female rats leads to acquisition of the ability of the lining epithelium to synthesize RA as well as to express CRABP(II). To determine whether this appearance of CRABP(II) was dependent on the production of RA, both E2 and RA were administered to ovariectomized rats. E2 administration induced expression of the CRABP(II) gene in the uterus within 4 h, and this induction was not inhibited by prior administration of puromycin, indicating that the induction was direct. In contrast, RA caused no change in CRABP(II) message level, even at times as late as 48 h after administration. Isolation and analysis of 4.5 kb of the 5'-flanking region of the gene revealed no apparent E2-response element. Using this portion of the gene to drive expression of the luciferase gene in transfected cells allowed identification of a region containing an imperfect estrogen-response element and estrogen-response element half-site, necessary for E2-driven induction. A possible Sp1 binding site in the 5'-flanking region of the CRABP(II) gene was also required for this induction. The ability of E2 to induce expression of CRABP(II) suggests that it can enhance the activity of RA, directly affecting expression of retinoid-responsive genes.     

Nuclear interactions of retinoic acid-binding protein in chemically induced mammary adenocarcinoma.

Cellular retinoic acid-binding protein (CRABP) was detected in the nuclear fraction of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced mammary cancers after the incubation of cytosol containing [3H]retinoic acid (RA)-bound CRABP with isolated nuclei. CRABP extracted from the nuclei in buffer containing 0.4 M-KCl sedimented as a 2 S component when subjected to sucrose-density-gradient analysis. [3H]RA-CRABP was found to be a prerequisite for the detection of nuclear binding, since the incubation of isolated nuclei or 0.4 M-KCl extract of the nuclei with [3H]RA did not result in any significant binding. Incubation of [3H]RA-CRABP at 25 or 30 degrees C before incubation with the nuclei neither altered the sedimentation coefficient nor enhanced the nuclear binding compared with 0 degrees C incubation. The tumour nuclei contained a saturable number of binding sites with a dissociation constant of 1.6 x 10(-9) M. These results indicate that the action of retinoic acid in the target organ may be mediated by its interaction with the nuclei.     

Retinoic acid stimulates the differentiation of PC12 cells that are deficient in cAMP-dependent protein kinase

Retinoic acid (RA) induced neuronal differentiation in A126-1B2 cells and 123.7 cells, two mutant lines of PC12 that are deficient in cAMP-dependent protein kinase, but not in the parental PC12 cell line. A single exposure to RA was sufficient to cause neurite formation and inhibit cell division for a period of greater than 3 wk, suggesting that RA may cause a long-term, stable change in the state of these cells. In A126-1B2 cells, RA also induced the expression of other markers of differentiation including acetylcholinesterase and the mRNAs for neurofilament (NF-M) and GAP-43 as effectively as nerve growth factor (NGF). Neither NGF nor RA stimulated an increase in the expression of smg-25A in A126-1B2 cells, suggesting that the cAMP-dependent protein kinases may be required for an increase in the expression of this marker. RA also caused a rapid increase in the expression of the early response gene, c-fos, but did not effect the expression of egr-1. RA equivalently inhibited the division of A126-1B2 cells, 123.7 cells and parental PC12 cells, so RA induced differentiation is not an indirect response to growth arrest. In contrast, the levels of retinoic acid receptors (RAR alpha and RAR beta), and retinoic acid binding protein (CRABP) mRNA were strikingly higher in both A126-1B2 cells and 123.7 cells than in the parental PC12 cells. The deficiencies in cAMP-dependent protein kinase may increase the expression of CRABP and the RARs; and, thus, cAMP may indirectly regulate the ability of RA to control neurite formation and neural differentiation. Thus, RA appears to regulate division and differentiation of PC12 cells by a biochemical mechanism that is quite distinct from those used by peptide growth factors.     

The cellular retinoic acid binding proteins

The two cellular retinoic acid binding proteins, CRABP I and CRABP II, belong to a family of small cytosolic lipid binding proteins and are highly conserved during evolution. Both proteins are expressed during embryogenesis, particularly in the developing nervous system, craniofacial region and limb bud. CRABP I is also expressed in several adult tissues, however, in contrast, CRABP II expression appears to be limited to the skin. It is likely that these proteins serve as regulators in the transport and metabolism of retinoic acid in the developing embryo and throughout adult life. It has been proposed that CRABP I sequesters retinoic acid in the cytoplasm and prevents nuclear uptake of retinoic acid. A role in catabolism of retinoic acid has also been proposed. Recent gene targeting experiments have shown that neither of the two CRABPs are essential for normal embryonic development or adult life. Examination of CRABP I expression at subcellular resolution reveals a differential cytoplasmic and/or nuclear localization of the protein. A regulated nuclear uptake of CRABP I implies a role for this protein in the intracellular transport of retinoic acid. A protein mediated mechanism which controls the nuclear uptake of retinoic acid may play an important role in the transactivation of the nuclear retinoic acid receptors.     

1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor as a mediator of transrepression of retinoid signaling

The receptors for retinoic acid (RA) and for 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (VD), RAR, RXR, and VDR are ligand-inducible members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. These receptors mediate their regulatory effects by binding as dimeric complexes to response elements located in regulatory regions of hormone target genes. Sequence scanning of the tumor necrosis factor-α type I receptor (TNFαRI) gene identified a 3′ enhancer region composed of two directly repeated hexameric core motifs spaced by 2 nucleotides (DR2). On this novel DR2-type sequence, but not on a DR5-type RA response element, VD was shown to act through its receptor, the vitamin D receptor (VDR), as a repressor of retinoid signalling. The repression appears to be mediated by competitive protein–protein interactions between VDR, RAR, RXR, and possibly their cofactors. This VDR-mediated transrepression of retinoid signaling suggests a novel mechanism for the complex regulatory interaction between retinoids and VD. J. Cell. Biochem. 67:287–296, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Analysis of the Factors Involved in the Retinoic Acid-Induced Differentiation of a Retinoid-Hypersensitive Embryonal Carcinoma Cell Mutant

Retinoic acid (RA) has been known to play an important role in cellular growth and differentiation as well as in vertebrate development. Many in vitro cell cultures also respond to RA by differentiating. Perhaps the most widely studied of these cultures are embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells. We have used an RA-hypersensitive EC cell mutant, created by retroviral insertion, to analyze the activity of the identifiable components in the RA response pathway. We have analyzed the mRNA expression patterns of the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) α, β, and γ, the retinoid X receptors (RXRs) α, β, and γ, and the cellular retinoic acid binding proteins (CRABPs) I and II. Our results indicate that CRABP I, RAR β, and RAR γ mRNAs are expressed differentially between parent and RA-hypersensitive mutant cells. All three messages are present at higher basal levels and at earlier times after RA addition in the mutant relative to parental cells. All other elements examined are equivalently expressed. Therefore analyses of the expression patterns of CRABPs, RARs, and RXRs in these RA-hypersensitive cells point to the probable importance of CRABP I, RAR β, and RAR γ in the RA induction pathway and also indicate that CRABP II and RXR γ are not likely to be critical elements in the early differentiative response of cells to RA.