The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E controls lettuce susceptibility to the Potyvirus Lettuce mosaic virus

The eIF4E and eIF(iso)4E cDNAs from several genotypes of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) that are susceptible, tolerant, or resistant to infection by Lettuce mosaic virus (LMV; genus Potyvirus) were cloned and sequenced. Although Ls-eIF(iso)4E was monomorphic in sequence, three types of Ls-eIF4E differed by point sequence variations, and a short in-frame deletion in one of them. The amino acid variations specific to Ls-eIF4E(1) and Ls-eIF4E(2) were predicted to be located near the cap recognition pocket in a homology-based tridimensional protein model. In 19 lettuce genotypes, including two near-isogenic pairs, there was a strict correlation between these three allelic types and the presence or absence of the recessive LMV resistance genes mo1(1) and mo1(2). Ls-eIF4E(1) and mo1(1) cosegregated in the progeny of two separate crosses between susceptible genotypes and an mo1(1) genotype. Finally, transient ectopic expression of Ls-eIF4E restored systemic accumulation of a green fluorescent protein-tagged LMV in LMV-resistant mo1(2) plants and a recombinant LMV expressing Ls-eIF4E degrees from its genome, but not Ls-eIF4E(1) or Ls-eIF(iso)4E, accumulated and produced symptoms in mo1(1) or mo1(2) genotypes. Therefore, sequence correlation, tight genetic linkage, and functional complementation strongly suggest that eIF4E plays a role in the LMV cycle in lettuce and that mo1(1) and mo1(2) are alleles coding for forms of eIF4E unable or less effective to fulfill this role. More generally, the isoforms of eIF4E appear to be host factors involved in the cycle of potyviruses in plants, probably through a general mechanism yet to be clarified.     

The potyviral virus genome-linked protein VPg forms a ternary complex with the eukaryotic initiation factors eIF4E and eIF4G and reduces eIF4E affinity for a mRNA cap analogue

The virus protein linked to the genome (VPg) of plant potyviruses is a 25-kDa protein covalently attached to the genomic RNA 5' end. It was previously reported that VPg binds specifically to eIF4E, the mRNAcap-binding protein of the eukaryotic translation initiation complex. We performed a spectroscopic study of the interactions between lettuce eIF4E and VPg from lettuce mosaic virus (LMV). The cap analogue m7GDP and VPg bind to eIF4E at two distinct sites with similar affinity (K(d) = 0.3 microm). A deeper examination of the interaction pathway showed that the binding of one ligand induces a decrease in the affinity for the other by a factor of 15. GST pull-down experiments from plant extracts revealed that VPg can specifically trap eIF4G, the central component of the complex required for the initiation of protein translation. Our data suggest that eIF4G recruitment by VPg is indirectly mediated through VPg-eIF4E association. The strength of interaction between eIF4E and pep4G, the eIF4E-binding domain on eIF4G, was increased significantly by VPg. Taken together these quantitative data show that VPg is an efficient modulator of eIF4E biochemical functions.     

Structural Insights into Parasite eIF4E Binding Specificity for m7G and m2,2,7G mRNA Caps

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E recognizes the mRNA cap, a key step in translation initiation. Here we have characterized eIF4E from the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni. Schistosome mRNAs have either the typical monomethylguanosine (m⁷G) or a trimethylguanosine (m^2,2,7G) cap derived from spliced leader trans-splicing. Quantitative fluorescence titration analyses demonstrated that schistosome eIF4E has similar binding specificity for both caps. We present the first crystal structure of an eIF4E with similar binding specificity for m⁷G and m^2,2,7G caps. The eIF4E·m⁷GpppG structure demonstrates that the schistosome protein binds monomethyl cap in a manner similar to that of single specificity eIF4Es and exhibits a structure similar to other known eIF4Es. The structure suggests an alternate orientation of a conserved, key Glu-90 in the cap-binding pocket that may contribute to dual binding specificity and a position for mRNA bound to eIF4E consistent with biochemical data. Comparison of NMR chemical shift perturbations in schistosome eIF4E on binding m⁷GpppG and m^2,2,7GpppG identified key differences between the two complexes. Isothermal titration calorimetry demonstrated significant thermodynamics differences for the binding process with the two caps (m⁷G versus m^2,2,7G). Overall the NMR and isothermal titration calorimetry data suggest the importance of intrinsic conformational flexibility in the schistosome eIF4E that enables binding to m^2,2,7G cap.     

Structure-based mutational analysis of eIF4E in relation to sbm1 resistance to pea seed-borne mosaic virus in pea

Background

Pea encodes eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E (eIF4E^S), which supports the multiplication of Pea seed-borne mosaic virus (PSbMV). In common with hosts for other potyviruses, some pea lines contain a recessive allele (sbm1) encoding a mutant eIF4E (eIF4E^R) that fails to interact functionally with the PSbMV avirulence protein, VPg, giving genetic resistance to infection.

Methodology/Principal Findings

To study structure-function relationships between pea eIF4E and PSbMV VPg, we obtained an X-ray structure for eIF4E^S bound to m⁷GTP. The crystallographic asymmetric unit contained eight independent copies of the protein, providing insights into the structurally conserved and flexible regions of eIF4E. To assess indirectly the importance of key residues in binding to VPg and/or m⁷GTP, an extensive range of point mutants in eIF4E was tested for their ability to complement PSbMV multiplication in resistant pea tissues and for complementation of protein translation, and hence growth, in an eIF4E-defective yeast strain conditionally dependent upon ectopic expression of eIF4E. The mutants also dissected individual contributions from polymorphisms present in eIF4E^R and compared the impact of individual residues altered in orthologous resistance alleles from other crop species. The data showed that essential resistance determinants in eIF4E differed for different viruses although the critical region involved (possibly in VPg-binding) was conserved and partially overlapped with the m⁷GTP-binding region. This overlap resulted in coupled inhibition of virus multiplication and translation in the majority of cases, although the existence of a few mutants that uncoupled the two processes supported the view that the specific role of eIF4E in potyvirus infection may not be restricted to translation.

Conclusions/Significance

The work describes the most extensive structural analysis of eIF4E in relation to potyvirus resistance. In addition to defining functional domains within the eIF4E structure, we identified eIF4E alleles with the potential to convey novel virus resistance phenotypes.     

Ribavirin targets eIF4E dependent Akt survival signaling

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E is dysregulated in many cancers. eIF4E, through its mRNA export and translation functions, combinatorially modulates the expression of genes involved in Akt dependent survival signaling. For these activities, eIF4E must bind the 7-methyl guanosine (m⁷G) cap moiety on the 5′-end of mRNAs. We demonstrate that a physical mimic of the m⁷G cap, ribavirin, inhibits eIF4E dependent Akt survival signaling. Specifically, ribavirin impairs eIF4E mediated Akt activation via inhibiting the production of an upstream activator of Akt, NBS1. Consequently, ribavirin impairs eIF4E dependent apoptotic rescue. A ribavirin analog with distinct physico-chemical properties, tiazofurin, does not impair eIF4E activity indicating that only analogs that mimic the m⁷G cap will inhibit eIF4E function. Ribavirin represents a first-in-class strategy to inhibit eIF4E dependent cancers, through competition for m⁷G cap binding. Thus, ribavirin coordinately impairs eIF4E dependent pathways and thereby, potently inhibits its biological effects.     

The Response of Lettuce Cultivars against Two Lettuce mosaic virus isolates,One Able to Systemically Infect the Resistant Cultivar Salinas 88

The response of seven lettuce cultivars to two geographically different Lettuce mosaic virus (LMV) isolates (LMV‐A, LMV‐T) was statistically evaluated based on infection rate, virus accumulation and symptom severity in different time trials. LMV‐A is characterized by the ability to systemically infect cv. Salinas 88 (mo1²‐carrying resistant cultivar), and inducing mild mosaic symptoms. Among lettuce cultivars, Varamin (a native cultivar) similar to cv. Salinas showed the most susceptibility to both LMV isolates, whereas another native cultivar, Varesh, was tolerant to the virus with minimal viral accumulation and symptom scores, significantly different from other cultivars at P < 0.05. LMV‐A systemically infects all susceptible lettuce cultivars more rapidly and at a higher rate than LMV‐T. This isolate accumulated in lettuce cultivars at a significantly higher level, determined by semiquantitative ELISA and induced more severe symptoms than LMV‐T isolate at 21 dpi. This is the first evidence for a LMV isolate with ability to systemically infect mo1²‐carrying resistant cultivar of lettuce from Iran. In this study, accumulation level of LMV showed statistically meaningful positive correlation with symptom severity on lettuce plants. Based on the results, three evaluated parameters differed considerably by lettuce cultivar and virus isolate.     

Two Arabidopsis Loci Encode Novel Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E Isoforms That Are Functionally Distinct from the Conserved Plant Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E

Canonical translation initiation in eukaryotes begins with the Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4F (eIF4F) complex, made up of eIF4E, which recognizes the 7-methylguanosine cap of messenger RNA, and eIF4G, which serves as a scaffold to recruit other translation initiation factors that ultimately assemble the 80S ribosome. Many eukaryotes have secondary EIF4E genes with divergent properties. The model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) encodes two such genes in tandem loci on chromosome 1, EIF4E1B (At1g29550) and EIF4E1C (At1g29590). This work identifies EIF4E1B/EIF4E1C-type genes as a Brassicaceae-specific diverged form of EIF4E. There is little evidence for EIF4E1C gene expression; however, the EIF4E1B gene appears to be expressed at low levels in most tissues, though microarray and RNA Sequencing data support enrichment in reproductive tissue. Purified recombinant eIF4E1b and eIF4E1c proteins retain cap-binding ability and form functional complexes in vitro with eIF4G. The eIF4E1b/eIF4E1c-type proteins support translation in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) but promote translation initiation in vitro at a lower rate compared with eIF4E. Findings from surface plasmon resonance studies indicate that eIF4E1b and eIF4E1c are unlikely to bind eIF4G in vivo when in competition with eIF4E. This study concludes that eIF4E1b/eIF4E1c-type proteins, although bona fide cap-binding proteins, have divergent properties and, based on apparent limited tissue distribution in Arabidopsis, should be considered functionally distinct from the canonical plant eIF4E involved in translation initiation.Cap-dependent translation in eukaryotes begins with recognition of the 7-methylguanosine cap at the 5′ end of an mRNA by the translation initiation factor eIF4E, which forms the eIF4F complex with the scaffolding protein eIF4G. The binding of the RNA helicase eIF4A along with eIF4B promotes unwinding of mRNA secondary structure (Aitken and Lorsch, 2012). The eIF4F complex then serves to circularize mRNA by interaction of eIF4G with poly(A) binding protein and recruit the preinitiation complex through binding of eIF4G to eIF3 and eIF5, ultimately leading to the assembly of the 80S ribosome (Aitken and Lorsch, 2012). eIF4E is an attractive target for global regulation of translational activity through its position at the earliest step, mRNA cap recognition. In many organisms, eIF4E availability is regulated by 4E-binding proteins as well as phosphorylation and sumoylation (Jackson et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2010). However, plants appear to lack 4E-binding proteins, and the role of phosphorylation of eIF4E in translational control is less clear (Pierrat et al., 2007).The eIF4E proteins generally thought to be involved in translation initiation are Class I eIF4E proteins (Joshi et al., 2005), of which two exist in flowering plants: eIF4E, which pairs with eIF4G to form the eIF4F complex, and the plant-specific isoform eIFiso4E, which pairs with eIFiso4G to form eIFiso4F (Mayberry et al., 2011; Patrick and Browning, 2012). Class I eIF4E family members have conserved Trp residues at positions equivalent to Trp-43 and Trp-56 of Homo sapiens eIF4E (Joshi et al., 2005), and the canonical members of this class, such as plant eIF4E and eIFiso4E, have the ability to promote translation through binding of mRNA cap structure and eIF4G (or eIFiso4G).In some organisms, however, secondary Class I isoforms exist with expression patterns and functions divergent from the conserved eIF4E (Rhoads, 2009). Caenorhabditis elegans has four isoforms involved in differentiation between mono- and trimethylated mRNA caps (Keiper et al., 2000) and have specialized roles for regulation of certain sets of mRNAs, particularly in the germline (Amiri et al., 2001; Song et al., 2010). Trypanosoma brucei has four isoforms with varying ability to bind cap analog and eIF4G isoforms (Freire et al., 2011). Schizosaccharomyces pombe has a second eIF4E isoform, eIF4E2, which is nonessential under normal growth conditions, but accumulates in response to high temperatures (Ptushkina et al., 2001). It cannot, however, complement deletion of EIF4E1, and while it can bind capped mRNA and promote translation in vitro, it has reduced ability to bind an eIF4G-derived peptide.Vertebrates encode a novel Class I isoform called EIF4E1B with oocyte-specific expression and functions (Evsikov and Marín de Evsikova, 2009). Zebrafish (Danio rerio) EIF4E1B, with expression limited to muscle and reproductive tissue, has conserved residues identified as necessary for binding cap analog and eIF4G, yet fails to bind either and cannot functionally complement deletion of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) eIF4E (Robalino et al., 2004). In Xenopus spp. oocytes, the eIF4E1b protein was found to bind eIF4E transporter and cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein to form a translation-repressing complex (Minshall et al., 2007). Drosophila species have undergone extensive expansion of EIF4E-encoding loci to as many as seven different Class I eIF4E isoforms (Tettweiler et al., 2012). The seven EIF4E isoforms of Drosophila melanogaster are differentially expressed, with only five able to bind to eIF4G and complement deletion of yeast eIF4E (Hernández et al., 2005). The eIF4E-3 isoform of D. melanogaster was recently described as having a specific role in spermatogenesis (Hernández et al., 2012).Upon completion of sequencing of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genome (Rhee et al., 2003), it was discovered that in addition to the conserved plant EIF4E (At4g18040) and EIFISO4E (At5g35620), there existed a tandem pair of genes of high sequence similarity on chromosome 1 that also encoded Class I eIF4E family proteins, EIF4E1B (At1g29550, also known as EIF4E3) and EIF4E1C (At1g29590, also known as EIF4E2). Published microarray and RNA Sequencing (RNA-Seq) data indicate little to no EIF4E1C gene expression; however, the EIF4E1B gene appears to be expressed at low levels in most tissues and enriched in tissues involved in reproduction. The protein sequences contain the residues predicted to be involved in regular eIF4E function but also showed some divergence at highly conserved residues of the canonical plant eIF4E. Genome sequencing data indicate that these genes are part of a divergent eIF4E clade specific to Brassicaceae.The biochemical properties of the eIF4E1b and eIF4E1c proteins were investigated in this work, and it was found that while they can bind mRNA cap analog and eIF4G and support translation in yeast lacking eIF4E, their eIF4G-binding and translation initiation enhancing capabilities in vitro were less robust when compared with the conserved Arabidopsis eIF4E. In addition, it appears that these EIF4E1B-type genes cannot substitute for EIF4E or EIFISO4E in planta because deletion of both of these genes appears to be lethal. Taken together, these findings indicate the EIF4E1B-type genes represent a divergent eIF4E whose roles should be considered separately from the canonical eIF4E in plant translation initiation.     

Intrinsic RNA Binding by the Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4F Depends on a Minimal RNA Length but Not on the m7G Cap

The eukaryotic initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) is thought to be the first factor to bind mRNA during 7-methylguanosine (m⁷G) cap-dependent translation initiation. The multipartite eIF4F contains the cap-binding protein eIF4E, and it is assumed that eIF4F binds mRNAs primarily at the 5′ m⁷G cap structure. We have analyzed equilibrium binding of rabbit eIF4F to a series of diverse RNAs and found no impact of the 5′-cap on the stability of eIF4F-RNA complexes. However, eIF4F preferentially and cooperatively binds to RNAs with a minimum length of ∼60 nucleotides in vitro. Furthermore, translation activity in rabbit reticulocyte lysate is strongly inhibited by RNAs exceeding this length, but not by shorter ones, consistent with the notion that eIF4F in its physiological environment preferentially binds longer RNAs, too. Collectively, our results indicate that intrinsic RNA binding by eIF4F depends on a minimal RNA length, rather than on cap recognition. The nonetheless essential m⁷G cap may either function at steps subsequent to eIF4F-RNA binding, or other factors facilitate preferential binding of eIF4F to the m⁷G cap.     

Lettuce mosaic virus: from pathogen diversity to host interactors

TAXONOMY: Lettuce mosaic virus (LMV) belongs to the genus Potyvirus (type species Potato virus Y) in the family Potyviridae. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES: The virion is filamentous, flexuous with a length of 750 nm and a width of 15 nm. The particles are made of a genomic RNA of 10 080 nucleotides, covalently linked to a viral-encoded protein (the VPg) at the 5' end and with a 3' poly A tail, and encapsidated in a single type of capsid protein. The molecular weight of the capsid protein subunit has been estimated electrophoretically to be 34 kDa and estimated from the amino acid sequence to be 31 kDa. GENOME ORGANIZATION: The genome is expressed as a polyprotein of 3255 amino-acid residues, processed by three virus-specific proteinases into ten mature proteins. HOSTS: LMV has a worldwide distribution and a relatively broad host range among several families. Weeds and ornamentals can act as local reservoirs for lettuce crops. In particular, many species within the family Asteraceae are susceptible to LMV, including cultivated and ornamental species such as common (Lactuca sativa), prickly (L. serriola) or wild (L. virosa) lettuce, endive/escarole (Cichorium endiva), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius), starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), Cape daisy (Osteospermum spp.) and gazania (Gazania rigens). In addition, several species within the families Brassicaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Fabaceae, Solanaceae and Chenopodiaceae are natural or experimental hosts of LMV. Genetic control of resistance to LMV: The only resistance genes currently used to protect lettuce crops worldwide are the recessive genes mo1(1) and mo1(2) corresponding to mutant alleles of the gene encoding the translation initiation factor eIF4E in lettuce. It is believed that at least one intact copy of eIF4E must be present to ensure virus accumulation. TRANSMISSION: LMV is transmitted in a non-persistent manner by a high number of aphid species. Myzus persicae and Macrosiphum euphorbiae are particularly active in disseminating this virus in the fields. LMV is also seedborne in lettuce. The effectiveness of LMV transmission depends on the cultivar and the age of the seed carrier at the inoculation time. SYMPTOMS: The characteristic symptoms on susceptible lettuce cultivars are dwarfism, mosaic, distortion and yellowing of the leaves with sometimes a much reduced heart of lettuce (failure to form heads). The differences in virus strains, cultivars and the physiological stage of the host at the moment of the attack cause different symptom severity: from a very slight discoloration of the veins to severe necrosis leading to the death of the plant.     

Requirement of RNA Binding of Mammalian Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4GI (eIF4GI) for Efficient Interaction of eIF4E with the mRNA Cap

Eukaryotic mRNAs possess a 5′-terminal cap structure (cap), m⁷GpppN, which facilitates ribosome binding. The cap is bound by eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), which is composed of eIF4E, eIF4G, and eIF4A. eIF4E is the cap-binding subunit, eIF4A is an RNA helicase, and eIF4G is a scaffolding protein that bridges between the mRNA and ribosome. eIF4G contains an RNA-binding domain, which was suggested to stimulate eIF4E interaction with the cap in mammals. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, however, such an effect was not observed. Here, we used recombinant proteins to reconstitute the cap binding of the mammalian eIF4E-eIF4GI complex to investigate the importance of the RNA-binding region of eIF4GI for cap interaction with eIF4E. We demonstrate that chemical cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure is dramatically enhanced by eIF4GI fragments possessing RNA-binding activity. Furthermore, the fusion of RNA recognition motif 1 (RRM1) of the La autoantigen to the N terminus of eIF4GI confers enhanced association between the cap structure and eIF4E. These results demonstrate that eIF4GI serves to anchor eIF4E to the mRNA and enhance its interaction with the cap structure.The cap structure, m⁷GpppN, is present at the 5′ terminus of all nuclear transcribed eukaryotic mRNAs. Cap-dependent binding of the ribosome to mRNA is mediated by the cap-binding protein eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), which forms a complex termed eIF4F together with eIF4G and eIF4A. Mammalian eIF4G, which has two isoforms, eIF4GI and eIF4GII, is a modular, multifunctional protein that binds to poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) (14) and eIF4E (18, 20) via the N-terminal third region. Mammalian eIF4G binds to eIF4A and eIF3 (15) via the middle third region and to eIF4A and Mnk protein kinase at the C-terminal region. eIF4GI also possesses an RNA-binding sequence (2, 9, 33) in the middle region. There are two RNA-binding sites on eIF4GI; one is located amino terminal to the first HEAT domain, and the other is located within the first HEAT domain (23). Mammalian and Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF4E are similar in size (24 kDa), but mammalian eIF4GI (220 kDa) is larger than its yeast counterpart (150 kDa), as the latter lacks a C-terminal domain corresponding to mammalian eIF4GI (38).The affinity of eIF4E for the cap structure has been a matter of dispute for some time. The earlier works of Carberry et al. (4) and Ueda et al. (39) estimated the equilibrium dissociation constant (K_d) of the eIF4E-cap complex by fluorescence titration to be 2 × 10⁻⁶ to 5 × 10⁻⁶ M depending on the nature of the cap analog. Later on, development of a new methodology for the fluorescence titration experiments yielded K_d values of 10⁻⁷ to 10⁻⁸ (29, 41). The source of the difference with the previous reports was thoroughly analyzed (29, 30). The interaction between the cap structure and eIF4E is dramatically enhanced by eIF4GI. This was first reported by showing that cross-linking of mammalian eIF4E to the cap structure is more efficient when it is a subunit of the eIF4F complex (19) or when it is complexed to eIF4GI (11). A similar enhancement of the binding of eIF4E to the cap structure was observed in yeast (40). However, two very different mechanisms were proposed to explain these observations. For the mammalian system, it was postulated that the middle segment of eIF4GI, which binds RNA, stabilizes the eIF4E interaction with the cap structure (11). This model was based primarily on the finding that in poliovirus-infected cells, eIF4GI is cleaved between its N-terminal third and the middle third, and consequently, eIF4E remains attached to the N-terminal eIF4GI fragment lacking the RNA-binding region. Under these conditions, cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure was poor (19, 31). In contrast, in yeast, a strong interaction between the cap structure and eIF4E was achieved using an eIF4G fragment containing the eIF4E-binding site that lacks the RNA-binding region (34, 40). Also, the yeast eIF4G fragment from amino acids 393 to 490 (fragment 393-490), which does not contain the RNA-binding site, forms a right-handed helical ring that wraps around the N terminus of eIF4E. This conformational change was suggested in turn to engender an allosteric enhancement of the association of eIF4E with the cap structure (10). Such an interaction between mammalian eIF4GI and eIF4E has not been reported.To understand the mechanism by which eIF4GI stimulates the interaction of eIF4E with the cap structure in mammals, we reconstituted the eIF4E-cap recognition activity in vitro with purified eIF4E and eIF4GI recombinant proteins. Using a chemical cross-linking assay, we demonstrate that only mammalian eIF4GI fragments possessing RNA-binding activity enhance the cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure. Our data provide new insight into the mechanism of cap recognition by the eIF4E-eIF4GI complex.     

Analysis of the interacting partners eIF4F and 3′‐CITE required for Melon necrotic spot virus cap‐independent translation

We have shown previously that the translation of Melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV, family Tombusviridae, genus Carmovirus) RNAs is controlled by a 3′‐cap‐independent translation enhancer (CITE), which is genetically and functionally dependent on the eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 4E. Here, we describe structural and functional analyses of the MNSV‐Mα5 3′‐CITE and its translation initiation factor partner. We first mapped the minimal 3′‐CITE (Ma5TE) to a 45‐nucleotide sequence, which consists of a stem‐loop structure with two internal loops, similar to other I‐shaped 3′‐CITEs. UV crosslinking, followed by gel retardation assays, indicated that Ma5TE interacts in vitro with the complex formed by eIF4E + eIF4G_980–1159 (eIF4F_p20), but not with each subunit alone or with eIF4E + eIF4G_1003–1092, suggesting binding either through interaction with eIF4E following a conformational change induced by its binding to eIF4G_980–1159, or through a double interaction with eIF4E and eIF4G_980–1159. Critical residues for this interaction reside in an internal bulge of Ma5TE, so that their mutation abolished binding to eIF4E + eIF4G_1003–1092 and cap‐independent translation. We also developed an in vivo system to test the effect of mutations in eIF4E in Ma5TE‐driven cap‐independent translation, showing that conserved amino acids in a positively charged RNA‐binding motif around amino acid position 228, implicated in eIF4E–eIF4G binding or belonging to the cap‐recognition pocket, are essential for cap‐independent translation controlled by Ma5TE, and thus for the multiplication of MNSV.     

The DEAD-box helicase DDX3 substitutes for the cap-binding protein eIF4E to promote compartmentalized translation initiation of the HIV-1 genomic RNA

Here, we show a novel molecular mechanism promoted by the DEAD-box RNA helicase DDX3 for translation of the HIV-1 genomic RNA. This occurs through the adenosine triphosphate-dependent formation of a translation initiation complex that is assembled at the 5′ m⁷GTP cap of the HIV-1 mRNA. This is due to the property of DDX3 to substitute for the initiation factor eIF4E in the binding of the HIV-1 m⁷GTP 5′ cap structure where it nucleates the formation of a core DDX3/PABP/eIF4G trimeric complex on the HIV-1 genomic RNA. By using RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization coupled to indirect immunofluorescence, we further show that this viral ribonucleoprotein complex is addressed to compartmentalized cytoplasmic foci where the translation initiation complex is assembled.     

Hypermethylated-capped selenoprotein mRNAs in mammals

Mammalian mRNAs are generated by complex and coordinated biogenesis pathways and acquire 5′-end m⁷G caps that play fundamental roles in processing and translation. Here we show that several selenoprotein mRNAs are not recognized efficiently by translation initiation factor eIF4E because they bear a hypermethylated cap. This cap modification is acquired via a 5′-end maturation pathway similar to that of the small nucle(ol)ar RNAs (sn- and snoRNAs). Our findings also establish that the trimethylguanosine synthase 1 (Tgs1) interacts with selenoprotein mRNAs for cap hypermethylation and that assembly chaperones and core proteins devoted to sn- and snoRNP maturation contribute to recruiting Tgs1 to selenoprotein mRNPs. We further demonstrate that the hypermethylated-capped selenoprotein mRNAs localize to the cytoplasm, are associated with polysomes and thus translated. Moreover, we found that the activity of Tgs1, but not of eIF4E, is required for the synthesis of the GPx1 selenoprotein in vivo.     

Involvement of the cylindrical inclusion (CI) protein in the overcoming of an eIF4E-mediated resistance against Lettuce mosaic potyvirus

The capacity of Lettuce mosaic virus to overcome the lettuce resistance conferred by the mo1¹ and mo1² alleles of the gene for eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) was analysed using reverse genetics. Mutations in the virus genome-linked protein (VPg) allowed mo1¹ only to be overcome, but mutations in the C-terminal portion of the cylindrical inclusion (CI) protein allowed both alleles to be overcome. Site-directed mutagenesis pinpointed a key role of the amino acid at position 621 in the virulence. This is the first example of the involvement of a potyviral CI protein in the breaking of an eIF4E-mediated resistance.     

Influence of the Length of the Phosphate Chain in mRNA 5′ Cap Analogues on Their Interaction with Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E

Abstract

The recognition of the 5′mRNA cap structure m⁷G(5′)ppp(5′)N by one of the components of the initiation translation machinery, the eIF4E factor, plays a pivotal role in regulation of the protein synthesis. In the present study we have shown two opposing roles of the cap phosphate chain in the specific eIF4E-cap interaction. The extension of the phosphate chain enhances the binding of the cap to the unphosphorylated eIF4E but destabilises the eIF4E-cap complex in case of the phosphorylated protein.     

Backbone resonance assignment of the HEAT1-domain of the human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4GI

Controlling translation during protein synthesis is crucial for cell proliferation and differentiation. Protein translation is orchestrated by an assembly of various protein components at the ribosomal subunits. The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) plays an important role in the formation of the translation initiation complex eIF4F consisting of eIF4G, the ATP dependent RNA helicase eIF4A and the cap binding protein eIF4E. One of the functions of eIF4G is the enhancement of the activity of eIF4A facilitated mainly through binding to the HEAT1 domain of eIF4G. In order to understand the interaction of HEAT1 with eIF4A and other components during translation initiation backbone assignment is essential. Here we report the ¹H, ¹³C and ¹⁵N backbone assignment for the HEAT1 domain of human eIF4G isoform I (eIF4GI-HEAT1), the first of three HEAT domains of eIF4G (29 kDa) as a basis for the elucidation of its structure and interactions with its binding partners, necessary for understanding the mechanism of its biological function.