Initiation factor IF2, thiostrepton and micrococcin prevent the binding of elongation factor G to the Escherichia coli ribosome

The bacterial translational GTPases (initiation factor IF2, elongation factors EF-G and EF-Tu and release factor RF3) are involved in all stages of translation, and evidence indicates that they bind to overlapping sites on the ribosome, whereupon GTP hydrolysis is triggered. We provide evidence for a common ribosomal binding site for EF-G and IF2. IF2 prevents the binding of EF-G to the ribosome, as shown by Western blot analysis and fusidic acid-stabilized EF-G.GDP.ribosome complex formation. Additionally, IF2 inhibits EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis on 70 S ribosomes. The antibiotics thiostrepton and micrococcin, which bind to part of the EF-G binding site and interfere with the function of the factor, also affect the function of IF2. While thiostrepton is a strong inhibitor of EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis, GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is stimulated by the drug. Micrococcin stimulates GTP hydrolysis by both factors. We show directly that these drugs act by destabilizing the interaction of EF-G with the ribosome, and provide evidence that they have similar effects on IF2.     

GTPases of translational apparatus

Protein biosynthesis is a complex biochemical process. It integrates multiple steps where different translation factors specifically interact with the ribosome in a precisely defined order. Among the translation factors one can find multiple GTP-binding or G-proteins. Their functioning is accompanied by GTP hydrolysis to the GDP and inorganic phosphate ion Pi. Ribosome stimulates the GTPase activity of the translation factors, thus playing a role analogues to GTPase-activating proteins (GAP). Translation factors--GTPases interact with the ribosome at all stages of protein biosynthesis. Initiation factor 2 (IF2) catalyse initiator tRNA binding to the ribosomal P-site and subsequent subunit joining. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) is responsible for the aminoacyl-tRNA binding to the ribosomal A-site, while elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyses translocation of mRNA in the ribosome by one codon, accompanied by tRNA movement between the binding sites. In its turn, release factor 3 (RF3) catalyse dissociation of the ribosomal complex with release factors 1 or 2 (RF1 or RF2) following the peptide release. This review is devoted to the functional peculiarities of translational GTPases as related to other G-proteins. Particularly, to the putative GTPase activation mechanism, structure and functional cycles.     

GTPases of the Translation Apparatus

Protein biosynthesis is a complex biochemical process involving a number of stages at which different translation factors specifically interact with ribosome. Some of these factors belong to GTP-binding proteins, or G-proteins. Due to their functioning, GTP is hydrolyzed to yield GDP and the inorganic phosphate ion P_i. Interaction with ribosome enhances GTPase activity of translation factors; i.e., ribosome plays a role of GTPase-activating protein (GAP). GTPases involved in translation interact with ribosome at every stage of protein biosynthesis. Initiation factor 2 (IF2) catalyzes initiator tRNA binding to the ribosome P site and subsequent binding of the 50S subunit to the initiation complex of the 30S subunit. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) controls aminoacyl-tRNA delivery to the ribosome A site, while elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyzes translocation of the mRNA-tRNA complex by one codon on the ribosome. Release factor 3 (RF3) catalyzes the release of termination factors 1 or 2 (RF1 or RF2) from the ribosomal complex after completion of protein synthesis and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. The functional properties of translational GTPases as related to other G-proteins, the putative mechanism of GTP hydrolysis, structural features, and the functional cycles of translational GTPases are considered.     

Domain III of elongation factor G from Thermus thermophilus is essential for induction of GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

Two elongation factors (EF) EF-Tu and EF-G participate in the elongation phase during protein biosynthesis on the ribosome. Their functional cycles depend on GTP binding and its hydrolysis. The EF-Tu complexed with GTP and aminoacyl-tRNA delivers tRNA to the ribosome, whereas EF-G stimulates translocation, a process in which tRNA and mRNA movements occur in the ribosome. In the present paper we report that: (a) intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is influenced by excision of its domain III; (b) the EF-G lacking domain III has a 10(3)-fold decreased GTPase activity on the ribosome, whereas its affinity for GTP is slightly decreased; and (c) the truncated EF-G does not stimulate translocation despite the physical presence of domain IV, which is also very important for translocation. By contrast, the interactions of the truncated factor with GDP and fusidic acid-dependent binding of EF-G.GDP complex to the ribosome are not influenced. These findings indicate an essential contribution of domain III to activation of GTP hydrolysis. These results also suggest conformational changes of the EF-G molecule in the course of its interaction with the ribosome that might be induced by GTP binding and hydrolysis.     

The Ribosomal Stalk Plays a Key Role in IF2-Mediated Association of the Ribosomal Subunits

Ribosomal “stalk” protein L12 is known to activate translational GTPases EF-G and EF-Tu, but not much is known about its role in relation to other two translational G factors, IF2 and RF3. Here, we have clarified the role of L12 in IF2-mediated initiation of bacterial protein synthesis. With fast kinetics measurements, we have compared L12-depleted 50S subunits with the native ones in subunit association, GTP hydrolysis, P_i (inorganic phosphate) release and IF2 release assays. L12 depletion from 50S subunit slows the subunit association step significantly (∼ 40 fold) only when IF2·GTP is present on the 30S preinitiation complex. This demonstrates that rapid subunit association depends on a specific interaction between the L12 stalk on the 50S subunit and IF2·GTP on the 30S subunit. L12 depletion, however, did not affect the individual rates of the subsequent steps including GTP hydrolysis on IF2 and P_i release. Thus, L12 is not a GTPase activating protein (GAP) for IF2 unlike as suggested for EF-G and EF-Tu.     

Delayed release of inorganic phosphate from elongation factor Tu following GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

The dissociation of inorganic phosphate (P(i)) following GTP hydrolysis is a key step determining the functional state of many GTPases. Here, the timing of P(i) release from elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and its implications for the function of EF-Tu on the ribosome were studied by rapid kinetic techniques. It was found that P(i) release from EF-Tu is >20-fold slower than GTP cleavage and limits the rate of the conformational switch of EF-Tu from the GTP- to the GDP-bound form. The point mutation Gly94Ala in the switch 2 region of EF-Tu abolished the delay in P(i) release, suggesting that P(i) release is controlled by the mobility of the switch 2 region with Gly94 acting as a pivot. The rate of P(i) release or the conformational switch of EF-Tu does not affect the selection of aminoacyl-tRNA on the ribosome. Rather, the slow P(i) release may be a consequence of the tight interaction of the switch regions of EF-Tu with the gamma-phosphate and the ribosome in the GTPase activated state of the factor.     

Arginines 29 and 59 of elongation factor G are important for GTP hydrolysis or translocation on the ribosome

GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor G (EF-G) is essential for the translocation step in protein elongation. The low intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is strongly stimulated by the ribosome. Here we show that a conserved arginine, R29, of Escherichia coli EF-G is crucial for GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome, but not for GTP binding or ribosome interaction, suggesting that it may be directly involved in catalysis. Another conserved arginine, R59, which is homologous to the catalytic arginine of G(alpha) proteins, is not essential for GTP hydrolysis, but influences ribosome binding and translocation. These results indicate that EF-G is similar to other GTPases in that an arginine residue is required for GTP hydrolysis, although the structural changes leading to GTPase activation are different.     

GTPases of the prokaryotic translation apparatus

Bacterial protein synthesis involves four protein factors that belong to the GTPase family: IF2, EF-G, EF-Tu, and RF3. Their role in translation has attracted considerable interest over the recent decades. Cryoelectron microscopy has made it possible to monitor the dynamics of the ribosome upon binding of the translation factors, and biochemical findings have associated the structural data with functional changes in GTPases: the exchange of GDP for GTP, activation of GTPase, and changes in its conformation. The results have been used to construct models of GTPase action during prokaryotic translation. Data are accumulating that the ribosome simultaneously acts as a GDP/GTP exchange factor and a GTPase-activating factor for RF3, IF2, and EF-G. The review systematizes the most important experimental findings and theoretical models proposed for regulation of the functional cycle of prokaryotic translation GTPases.     

Mutation of Thr445 and Ile500 of initiation factor 2 G-domain affects Escherichia coli growth rate at low temperature

The Escherichia coli protein synthesis initiation factor IF2 is a member of the large family of G-proteins. Along with translational elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G and translational release factor RF-3, IF2 belongs to the subgroup of G-proteins that are part of the prokaryotic translational apparatus. The roles of IF2 and EF-Tu are similar: both promote binding of an aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosome and hydrolyze GTP. In order to investigate the differences and similarities between EF-Tu and IF2 we have created point mutations in the G-domain of IF2, Thr445 to Cys, Ile500 to Cys, and the double mutation. Threonine 445 (X1), which corresponds to cysteine 81 in EF-Tu, is well conserved in the DX1X2GH consensus sequence that has been proposed to interact with GTP. The NKXD motif, in which X is isoleucine 500 in IF2, corresponds to cysteine 137 in EF-Tu, and is responsible for the binding of the guanine ring. The recombinant mutant proteins were expressed and tested in vivo for their ability to sustain growth of an Escherichia coli strain lacking the chromosomal copy of the infB gene coding for IF2. All mutated proteins resulted in cell viability when grown at 42 degrees C or 37 degrees C. However, Thr445 to Cys mutant showed a significant decrease in the growth rate at 25 degrees C. The mutant proteins were overexpressed and purified. As observed in vivo, a reduced activity at low temperature was measured when carrying out in vitro ribosome dependent GTPase and stimulation of ribosomal fMet-tRNAfMet binding.     

SmpB triggers GTP hydrolysis of elongation factor Tu on ribosomes by compensating for the lack of codon-anticodon interaction during trans-translation initiation

Bacterial tmRNA rescues ribosomes that stall because of defective mRNAs via the trans-translation process. Although entry of the charged transfer messenger RNA (tmRNA) into the ribosome proceeded in the absence of elongation factor (EF-Tu) and in the presence of EF-Tu and the antibiotic kirromycin, evidence was found for the involvement of EF-Tu in trans-translation initiation. The polyalanine synthesis system attained by using a tmRNA variant consisting of only the tRNA-like domain revealed that it was completely dependent on the presence of SmpB and greatly enhanced by EF-Tu and EF-G. Actually, ribosome-dependent GTPase activity of EF-Tu was stimulated by the addition of SmpB and tmRNA but independently of template mRNA, demonstrating that SmpB compensates for the lack of codon-anticodon interaction during the first step of the trans-translation initiation. Based on these results, we suggest that SmpB structurally mimics the anticodon arm of tRNA and elicits GTP hydrolysis of EF-Tu upon tmRNA accommodation in the A site of the ribosome.     

Codon-dependent conformational change of elongation factor Tu preceding GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome.

The mechanisms by which elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) promotes the binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site of the ribosome and, in particular, how GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu is triggered on the ribosome, are not understood. We report steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence measurements, performed in the Escherichia coli system, in which the interaction of the complex EF-Tu.GTP.Phe-tRNAPhe with the ribosomal A site is monitored by the fluorescence changes of either mant-dGTP [3'-O-(N-methylanthraniloyl)-2-deoxyguanosine triphosphate], replacing GTP in the complex, or of wybutine in the anticodon loop of the tRNA. Additionally, GTP hydrolysis is measured by the quench-flow technique. We find that codon-anticodon interaction induces a rapid rearrangement within the G domain of EF-Tu around the bound nucleotide, which is followed by GTP hydrolysis at an approximately 1.5-fold lower rate. In the presence of kirromycin, the activated conformation of EF-Tu appears to be frozen. The steps following GTP hydrolysis--the switch of EF-Tu to the GDP-bound conformation, the release of aminoacyl-tRNA from EF-Tu to the A site, and the dissociation of EF-Tu-GDP from the ribosome--which are altogether suppressed by kirromycin, are not distinguished kinetically. The results suggest that codon recognition by the ternary complex on the ribosome initiates a series of structural rearrangements resulting in a conformational change of EF-Tu, possibly involving the effector region, which, in turn, triggers GTP hydrolysis.     

A signal relay between ribosomal protein S12 and elongation factor EF-Tu during decoding of mRNA

Codon recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA on the ribosome triggers a process leading to GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and release of aminoacyl-tRNA into the A site of the ribosome. The nature of this signal is largely unknown. Here, we present genetic evidence that a specific set of direct interactions between ribosomal protein S12 and aminoacyl-tRNA, together with contacts between S12 and 16S rRNA, provide a pathway for the signaling of codon recognition to EF-Tu. Three novel amino acid substitutions, H76R, R37C, and K53E in Thermus thermophilus ribosomal protein S12, confer resistance to streptomycin. The streptomycin-resistance phenotypes of H76R, R37C, and K53E are all abolished by the mutation A375T in EF-Tu. A375T confers resistance to kirromycin, an antibiotic freezing EF-Tu in a GTPase activated state. H76 contacts aminoacyl-tRNA in ternary complex with EF-Tu and GTP, while R37 and K53 are involved in the conformational transition of the 30S subunit occurring upon codon recognition. We propose that codon recognition and domain closure of the 30S subunit are signaled through aminoacyl-tRNA to EF-Tu via these S12 residues.     

Stimulation of the GTPase activity of translation elongation factor G by ribosomal protein L7/12

Elongation factors (EFs) Tu and G are GTPases that have important functions in protein synthesis. The low intrinsic GTPase activity of both factors is strongly stimulated on the ribosome by unknown mechanisms. Here we report that isolated ribosomal protein L7/12 strongly stimulates GTP hydrolysis by EF-G, but not by EF-Tu, indicating a major contribution of L7/12 to GTPase activation of EF-G on the ribosome. The effect is due to the acceleration of the catalytic step because the rate of GDP-GTP exchange on EF-G, as measured by rapid kinetics, is much faster than the steady-state GTPase rate. The unique, highly conserved arginine residue in the C-terminal domain of L7/12 is not essential for the activation, excluding an "arginine finger"-type mechanism. L7/12 appears to function by stabilizing the GTPase transition state of EF-G.     

Molecular dynamics of ribosomal elongation factors G and Tu

Translation on the ribosome is controlled by external factors. During polypeptide lengthening, elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G consecutively interact with the bacterial ribosome. EF-Tu binds and delivers an aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A site and EF-G helps translocate the tRNAs between their binding sites after the peptide bond is formed. These processes occur at the expense of GTP. EF-Tu:tRNA and EF-G are of similar shape, share a common binding site, and undergo large conformational changes on interaction with the ribosome. To characterize the internal motion of these two elongation factors, we used 25 ns long all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. We observed enhanced mobility of EF-G domains III, IV, and V and of tRNA in the EF-Tu:tRNA complex. EF-Tu:GDP complex acquired a configuration different from that found in the crystal structure of EF-Tu with a GTP analogue, showing conformational changes in the switch I and II regions. The calculated electrostatic properties of elongation factors showed no global similarity even though matching electrostatic surface patches were found around the domain I that contacts the ribosome, and in the GDP/GTP binding region.     

An elongation factor G-induced ribosome rearrangement precedes tRNA-mRNA translocation

The elongation cycle of protein synthesis is completed by translocation, a rearrangement during which two tRNAs bound to the mRNA move on the ribosome. The reaction is promoted by elongation factor G (EF-G) and accelerated by GTP hydrolysis. Here we report a pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of translocation. The kinetic model suggests that GTP hydrolysis drives a conformational rearrangement of the ribosome that precedes and limits the rates of tRNA-mRNA translocation and Pi release from EF-G.GDP.Pi. The latter two steps are intrinsically rapid and take place at random. These results indicate that the energy of GTP hydrolysis is utilized to promote the ribosome rearrangement and to bias spontaneous fluctuations within the ribosome-EF-G complex toward unidirectional movement of mRNA and tRNA.     

Splitting of the posttermination ribosome into subunits by the concerted action of RRF and EF-G

After peptide release by a class-1 release factor, the ribosomal subunits must be recycled back to initiation. We have demonstrated that the distance between a strong Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence and a codon in the P site is crucial for the binding stability of the deacylated tRNA in the P site of the posttermination ribosome and the in-frame maintenance of its mRNA. We show that the elongation factor EF-G and the ribosomal recycling factor RRF split the ribosome into subunits in the absence of initiation factor 3 (IF3) by a mechanism that requires both GTP and GTP hydrolysis. Taking into account that EF-G in the GTP form and RRF bind with positive cooperativity to the free 50S subunit but with negative cooperativity to the 70S ribosome, we suggest a mechanism for ribosome recycling that specifies distinct roles for EF-G, RRF, and IF3.     

Elongation factor Tu ternary complex binds to small ribosomal subunits in a functionally active state

A complex between elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), GTP, phenylalanyl-tRNA (Phe-tRNA), oligo(uridylic acid) [oligo(U)], and the 30S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli has been formed and isolated. Binding of the EF-Tu complex appears to be at the functionally active 30S site, by all biochemical criteria that were examined. The complex can be isolated with 0.25-0.5 copy of EF-Tu bound per ribosome. The binding is dependent upon the presence of both the aminoacyl-tRNA and the cognate messenger RNA. Addition of 50S subunits to the preformed 30S-EF-Tu-GTP-Phe-tRNA-oligo(U) complex ("30S-EF-Tu complex") causes a rapid hydrolysis of GTP. This hydrolysis is coordinated with the formation of 70S ribosomes and the release of EF-Tu. Both the release of EF-Tu and the hydrolysis of GTP are stoichiometric with the amount of added 50S subunits. 70S ribosomes, in contrast to 50S subunits, neither release EF-Tu nor rapidly hydrolyze GTP when added to the 30S-EF-Tu complexes. The inability of 70S ribosomes to react with the 30S-EF-Tu complex argues that the 30S-EF-Tu complex does not dissociate prior to reaction with the 50S subunit. The requirements of the 30S reaction for Phe-tRNA and oligo(U) and the consequences of the addition of 50S subunits resemble the reaction of EF-Tu with 70S ribosomes, although EF-Tu binding to isolated 30S subunits does not occur during the elongation microcycle. This suggests that the EF-Tu ternary complex binds to isolated 30S subunits at the same 30S site that is occupied during ternary complex interaction with the 70S ribosome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Control of phosphate release from elongation factor G by ribosomal protein L7/12

Ribosomal protein L7/12 is crucial for the function of elongation factor G (EF-G) on the ribosome. Here, we report the localization of a site in the C-terminal domain (CTD) of L7/12 that is critical for the interaction with EF-G. Single conserved surface amino acids were replaced in the CTD of L7/12. Whereas mutations in helices 5 and 6 had no effect, replacements of V66, I69, K70, and R73 in helix 4 increased the Michaelis constant (KM) of EF-G.GTP for the ribosome, suggesting an involvement of these residues in EF-G binding. The mutations did not appreciably affect rapid single-round GTP hydrolysis and had no effect on tRNA translocation on the ribosome. In contrast, the release of inorganic phosphate (Pi) from ribosome-bound EF-G.GDP.Pi was strongly inhibited and became rate-limiting for the turnover of EF-G. The control of Pi release by interactions between EF-G and L7/12 appears to be important for maintaining the conformational coupling between EF-G and the ribosome for translocation and for timing the dissociation of the factor from the ribosome.     

EF-Tu dynamics during pre-translocation complex formation: EF-Tu·GDP exits the ribosome via two different pathways

The G-protein EF-Tu, which undergoes a major conformational change when EF-Tu·GTP is converted to EF-Tu·GDP, forms part of an aminoacyl(aa)-tRNA·EF-Tu·GTP ternary complex (TC) that accelerates the binding of aa-tRNA to the ribosome during peptide elongation. Such binding, placing a portion of EF-Tu in contact with the GTPase Associated Center (GAC), is followed by GTP hydrolysis and P_i release, and results in formation of a pretranslocation (PRE) complex. Although tRNA movement through the ribosome during PRE complex formation has been extensively studied, comparatively little is known about the dynamics of EF-Tu interaction with either the ribosome or aa-tRNA. Here we examine these dynamics, utilizing ensemble and single molecule assays employing fluorescent labeled derivatives of EF-Tu, tRNA, and the ribosome to measure changes in either FRET efficiency or fluorescence intensity during PRE complex formation. Our results indicate that ribosome-bound EF-Tu separates from the GAC prior to its full separation from aa-tRNA, and suggest that EF-Tu·GDP dissociates from the ribosome by two different pathways. These pathways correspond to either reversible EF-Tu·GDP dissociation from the ribosome prior to the major conformational change in EF-Tu that follows GTP hydrolysis, or irreversible dissociation after or concomitant with this conformational change.     

Novel roles for classical factors at the interface between translation termination and initiation.

The pathway of bacterial ribosome recycling following translation termination has remained obscure. Here, we elucidate two essential steps and describe the roles played by the three translation factors EF-G, RRF, and IF3. Release factor RF3 is known to catalyze the dissociation of RF1 or RF2 from ribosomes after polypeptide release. We show that the next step is dissociation of 50S subunits from the 70S posttermination complex and that it is catalyzed by RRF and EF-G and requires GTP hydrolysis. Removal of deacylated tRNA from the resulting 30S:mRNA:tRNA posttermination complex is then necessary to permit rapid 30S subunit recycling. We show that this step requires initiation factor IF3, whose role was previously thought to be restricted to promoting specific 30S initiation complex formation from free 30S subunits.