The folding properties of the Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein influence its interaction with SecB in vitro.

It has been proposed that the cytoplasmic SecB protein functions as a component of the Escherichia coli protein export machinery by serving as an antifolding factor that retards folding of the precursor maltose-binding protein (preMBP) into a translocation-incompetent form. In this study, it was found that SecB directly interacts with wild-type preMBP and various mutationally altered MBP species synthesized in vitro to form a SecB-MBP complex that can be precipitated with anti-SecB serum. The association of SecB with wild-type preMBP was relatively unstable; such a complex was formed only when SecB was present cotranslationally or after denaturation of previously synthesized preMBP and was detected with only low efficiency. In marked contrast, MBP species that were defective in the ability to assume the stable conformation of wild-type preMBP or that exhibited significantly slower folding kinetics formed much more stable complexes with SecB. In one case, we demonstrated that SecB did not need to be present cotranslationally for complex formation to occur. Formation of a complex between SecB and MBP was clearly not dependent on the MBP signal peptide. However, we were unable to detect complex formation between SecB and MBP lacking virtually the entire signal peptide but having a completely intact mature moiety. This MBP species folded at a rate considerably faster than that of wild-type preMBP. The propensity of this mutant protein to assume the native conformation of mature MBP apparently precludes a stable association with SecB, whereas an MBP species lacking a signal peptide but exhibiting altered folding properties did form a complex with SecB that could be precipitated with anti-SecB serum.     

Mutations that improve export of maltose-binding protein in SecB- cells of Escherichia coli.

It previously has been proposed that the Escherichia coli SecB protein promotes the export of the maltose-binding protein (MBP) from the cytoplasm by preventing the folding of the precursor MBP (preMBP) into a translocation-incompetent conformation. The export of wild-type MBP is only partially blocked in SecB- cells. In contrast, the export of MBP16-1, an MBP species with a defective signal peptide, is totally dependent on SecB; hence, SecB- cells that synthesize MBP16-1 are unable to utilize maltose as a sole carbon source. The selection of Mal+ revertants primarily yielded mutants with alterations in the MBP16-1 signal peptide that permitted SecB-independent MBP export to the periplasm to various extents. Although each of these alterations increased the overall hydrophobicity of the signal peptide, it was not possible to strictly equate changes in hydrophobicity with the degree of SecB-independent export. Somewhat unexpectedly, two mutants were obtained in which MBP export in SecB- cells was markedly superior to that of the wild-type MBP. Although wild-type MBP is not cotranslationally translocated in SecB- cells, the two mutant proteins designated MBP172 and MBP173 exhibited significant cotranslational export in the absence of SecB. Thus, the role of SecB was partially supplanted by a signal peptide that promoted more rapid movement of MBP through the export pathway. When preMBP included the MBP172 signal peptide as well as an alteration in the mature moiety that slows folding, the SecB requirement for maximal MBP export efficiency was almost totally eliminated. These results provide additional strong support for the proposed antifolding role of SecB in MBP export.     

Kinetics and energetics of the translocation of maltose binding protein folding mutants

Protein translocation in Escherichia coli is mediated by the translocase that, in its minimal form, comprises a protein-conducting pore (SecYEG) and a motor protein (SecA). The SecYEG complex forms a narrow channel in the membrane that allows passage of secretory proteins (preproteins) in an unfolded state only. It has been suggested that the SecA requirement for translocation depends on the folding stability of the mature preprotein domain. Here we studied the effects of the signal sequence and SecB on the folding and translocation of folding stabilizing and destabilizing mutants of the mature maltose binding protein (MBP). Although the mutations affect the folding of the precursor form of MBP, these are drastically overruled by the combined unfolding stabilization of the signal sequence and SecB. Consequently, the translocation kinetics, the energetics and the SecA and SecB dependence of the folding mutants are indistinguishable from those of wild-type preMBP. These data indicate that unfolding of the mature domain of preMBP is likely not a rate-determining step in translocation when the protein is targeted to the translocase via SecB.     

SecB-Mediated Protein Export Need Not Occur via Kinetic Partitioning

In Escherichia coli, the cytosolic chaperone SecB is responsible for the selective entry of a subset of precursor proteins into the Sec pathway. In vitro, SecB binds to a variety of unfolded substrates without apparent sequence specificity, but not native proteins. Selectivity has therefore been suggested to occur by kinetic partitioning of substrates between protein folding and SecB association. Evidence for kinetic partitioning is based on earlier observations that SecB blocks the refolding of the precursor form of maltose-binding protein (preMBP)⁵ and slow-folding maltose-binding protein (MBP) mutants, but not faster-folding mature wild-type MBP. In order to quantitatively validate the kinetic partitioning model, we have independently measured each of the rate constants involved in the interaction of SecB with refolding preMBP (a physiological substrate of SecB) and mature MBP. The measured rate constants correctly predict substrate folding kinetics over a wide range of SecB, MBP, and preMBP concentrations. Analysis of the data reveals that, for many substrates, kinetic partitioning is unlikely to be responsible for SecB-mediated protein export. Instead, the ability of SecB-bound substrates to continue folding while bound to SecB and their ability to interact with other components of the secretory machinery such as SecA may be key opposing determinants that inhibit and promote protein export, respectively.     

Coupling between codon usage, translation and protein export in Escherichia coli

Proteins destined for export via the Sec-dependent pathway are synthesized with a short N-terminal signal peptide. A requirement for export is that the proteins are in a translocationally competent state. This is a loosely folded state that allows the protein to pass through the SecYEG apparatus and pass into the periplasm. In order to maintain pre-secretory proteins in an export-competent state, there are many factors that slow the folding of the pre-secretory protein in the cytoplasm. These include cytoplasmic chaperones, such as SecB, and the signal recognition particle, which bind the pre-secretory protein and direct it to the cytoplasmic membrane for export. Recently, evidence has been published that non-optimal codons in the signal sequence are important for a time-critical early event to allow the correct folding of pre-secretory proteins. This review details the recent developments in folding of the signal peptide and the pre-secretory protein.     

Requirement of the SecB chaperone for export of a non-secretory polypeptide in Escherichia coli

Summary The SecB protein of Escherichia coli is a cytosolic component of the export machinery which can prevent some precursors from prematurely folding into export-incompatible conformations by binding to the newly synthesised polypeptide. The feature(s) of target proteins recognised by SecB, however, are unclear and have been a matter of controversy. Also, it has not been asked if binding of SecB is specific for secretory proteins. We demonstrate here that a non-secretory polypeptide, a fragment of a tail fiber protein of phage T4, fused to the signal peptide of the outer membrane protein OmpA has a very strong SecB requirement for export and that the signal peptide itself cannot, at least not alone, be responsible for this action of SecB. The data reported, together with those of the literature, suggest that SecB recognizes the polypeptide backbone of the target protein.     

SecB protein: A cytosolic export factor that associates with nascent exported proteins

Soluble factors participate in protein translocation across a variety of biological membranes. TheEscherichia coli soluble protein SecB (the product of thesecB gene) is involved in the export of periplasmic and outer membrane proteins. The isolation ofsecB mutations permitted the demonstration that SecB is required for rapid and efficient export of certain proteins. Consistent with the results of these genetic studies, purified SecB has been shown to stimulate protein translocation acrossE. coli inner membrane vesiclesin vitro. This article presents a review of these past studies of SecB, speculation on the role of SecB in protein translocation, and a comparison of SecB and other factors, trigger factor and GroEL.     

Effect of signal peptide on the stability and folding kinetics of maltose binding protein

While the role of the signal sequence in targeting proteins to specific subcellular compartments is well characterized, there are fewer studies that characterize its effects on the stability and folding kinetics of the protein. We report a detailed characterization of the folding kinetics and thermodynamic stabilities of maltose binding protein (MBP) and its precursor form, preMBP. Isothermal GdmCl and urea denaturation as a function of temperature and thermal denaturation studies have been carried out to compare stabilities of the two proteins. preMBP was found to be destabilized by about 2-6 kcal/mol (20-40%) with respect to MBP. Rapid cleavage of the signal peptide by various proteases shows that the signal peptide is accessible in the native form of preMBP. The observed rate constant of the major slow phase in folding was decreased 5-fold in preMBP relative to MBP. The rate constants of unfolding were similar at 25 degrees C, but preMBP also exhibited a large burst phase change in unfolding that was absent in MBP. At 10 degrees C, preMBP exhibited a higher unfolding rate than MBP as well as a large burst phase. The appreciable destabilization of MBP by signal peptide is functionally relevant, because it enhances the likelihood of finding the protein in an unfolded translocation-competent form and may influence the interactions of the protein with the translocation machinery. Destabilization is likely to result from favorable interactions between the hydrophobic signal peptide and other hydrophobic regions that are exposed in the unfolded state.     

SecB-independent export of Escherichia coli ribose-binding protein (RBP): some comparisons with export of maltose-binding protein (MBP) and studies with RBP-MBP hybrid proteins.

The efficient export of the Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein (MBP) is known to be SecB dependent, whereas ribose-binding protein (RBP) export is SecB independent. When the MBP and RBP signal peptides were exchanged precisely at the signal peptidase processing sites, the resultant RBP-MBP and MBP-RBP hybrid proteins both were efficiently exported in SecB+ cells. However, only MBP-RBP was efficiently exported in SecB- cells; RBP-MBP exhibited a significant export defect, a finding that was consistent with previous proposals that SecB specifically interacts with the mature moiety of precursor MBP to promote export. The relatively slow, totally posttranslational export mode exhibited by certain mutant RBP and MBP-RBP species in SecB+ cells was not affected by the loss of SecB. In contrast, MBP and RBP-MBP species with similarly altered signal peptides were totally export defective in SecB- cells. Both export-defective MBP and RBP-MBP interfered with SecB-mediated protein export by depleting cells of functional SecB. In contrast, neither export-defective RBP nor MBP-RBP elicited such an interference effect. These and other data indicated that SecB is unable to interact with precursor RBP or that any interaction between these two proteins is considerably weaker than that of SecB with precursor MBP. In addition, no correlation could be established between a SecB requirement for export and PrlA-mediated suppression of signal peptide export defects. Finally, previous studies have established that wild-type MBP export can be accomplished cotranslationally, whereas wild-type RBP export is strictly a posttranslational process. In this study, cotranslational export was not detected for either MBP-RBP or RBP-MBP. This indicates that the export mode exhibited by a given precursor protein (cotranslational versus posttranslational) is determined by properties of both the signal peptide and the mature moiety.     

Signal peptide mutants ofEscherichia coli

Numerous secretory proteins of the Gram-negative bacteriaE. coli are synthesized as precursor proteins which require an amino terminal extension known as the signal peptide for translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane. Following translocation, the signal peptide is proteolytically cleaved from the precursor to produce the mature exported protein. Signal peptides do not exhibit sequence homology, but invariably share common structural features: (1) The basic amino acid residues positioned at the amino terminus of the signal peptide are probably involved in precursor protein binding to the cytoplasmic membrane surface. (2) A stretch of 10 to 15 nonpolar amino acid residues form a hydrophobic core in the signal peptide which can insert into the lipid bilayer. (3) Small residues capable of -turn formation are located at the cleavage site in the carboxyl terminus of the signal peptide. (4) Charge characteristics of the amino terminal region of the mature protein can also influence precursor protein export. A variety of mutations in each of the structurally distinct regions of the signal peptide have been constructedvia site-directed mutagenesis or isolated through genetic selection. These mutants have shed considerable light on the structure and function of the signal peptide and are reviewed here.     

Identification of a Post-targeting Step Required for Efficient Cotranslational Translocation of Proteins across the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane

Recent studies have shown that cytoplasmic proteins are exported efficiently in Escherichia coli only if they are attached to signal peptides that are recognized by the signal recognition particle and are thereby targeted to the SecYEG complex cotranslationally. The evidence suggests that the entry of these proteins into the secretory pathway at an early stage of translation is necessary to prevent them from folding into a translocation-incompetent conformation. We found, however, that several glycolytic enzymes attached to signal peptides that are recognized by the signal recognition particle were exported inefficiently. Based on previous studies of post-translational export, we hypothesized that the export block was due to the presence of basic residues at the extreme N terminus of each enzyme. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that the introduction of negatively charged residues into this segment increased the efficiency of export. Export efficiency was sensitive to the number, position, and sequence context of charged residues. The importance of charge for efficient export was underscored by an in silico analysis that revealed a conserved negative charge bias at the N terminus of the mature region of bacterial presecretory proteins. Our results demonstrate that cotranslational targeting of a protein to the E. coli SecYEG complex does not ensure its export but that export also depends on a subsequent event (most likely the initiation of translocation) that involves sequences both within and just beyond the signal peptide.Since the “signal hypothesis” was proposed over 30 years ago (1), it has become clear that signal sequences are not simply generic hydrophobic peptides that earmark proteins for secretion. In bacteria, the features of a signal peptide determine the mechanism by which a given presecretory protein is targeted to the SecYEG translocation complex in the inner membrane (IM).² Whereas most or all signal peptides are recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP) in mammalian cells, only a small fraction of Escherichia coli signal peptides are recognized by SRP. These signal peptides are typically extremely hydrophobic (2, 3), but SRP apparently can also recognize slightly less hydrophobic signal peptides that contain a highly basic N terminus (4). SRP recognizes signal peptides as they emerge from translating ribosomes and then targets ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the IM cotranslationally (5). The binding of SRP to its receptor (FtsY), which interacts with the SecYEG complex (6), leads to the release of the nascent chain in the immediate vicinity of the translocation machinery. By targeting nascent polypeptides to the SecYEG complex at an early stage of translation, SRP prevents its substrates from folding into a conformation that is incompatible with translocation through the narrow channel formed by the SecYEG complex (7). Because most signal peptides are not recognized by E. coli SRP, the majority of presecretory proteins are fully synthesized and targeted post-translationally to the IM. These proteins are maintained in a translocation-competent conformation by molecular chaperones such as SecB that keep them unfolded (or loosely folded) (8). Signal peptides themselves also appear to play a role in maintaining translocation competence (9, 10). After mediating the targeting reaction, signal peptides likely play a role in gating open the SecYEG complex to initiate translocation.Interestingly, although signal sequences are the most salient feature of presecretory proteins, they are neither completely necessary nor sufficient to mediate protein export in E. coli (11–13). A version of alkaline phosphatase that lacks a signal peptide is still exported, albeit very inefficiently (11). The export of the leaderless protein, unlike the export of wild-type alkaline phosphatase, is strictly dependent on SecB (11). Conversely, the attachment of signal peptides to cytoplasmic proteins often does not promote their export (14). In light of evidence that folding and export are competing events, these observations led to the proposal that exported proteins tend to fold slowly (or are prevented from folding by chaperones) and therefore remain translocation-competent even without a signal peptide, whereas cytoplasmic proteins fold rapidly into a conformation that is incompatible with export. Recent studies that used thioredoxin as a model protein have validated this hypothesis. Whereas the wild-type protein attached to a typical signal peptide remained trapped in the cytoplasm, four of five slow folding mutants were exported efficiently (15). Furthermore, attachment of a signal peptide that is recognized by SRP to thioredoxin led to efficient export (16). This idea was further confirmed by a report in which various DARPins (designed ankyrin Repeat proteins) were attached to different signal peptides. Most of the DARPins were exported efficiently when they were fused to signal peptides that mediate cotranslational targeting but remained in the cytoplasm when they were attached to signal peptides that are bypassed by SRP (17).Despite these observations, there are several lines of evidence suggesting that export efficiency is not simply dictated by the ability of a protein to reach the SecYEG complex before folding into a translocation-incompetent conformation. For reasons that are unclear, some DARPins are secreted inefficiently even when they are routed into the SRP pathway (17). In addition, numerous reports have indicated that the amino acid composition of the segment of post-translationally targeted presecretory proteins that lies just beyond the signal peptide cleavage site has a dramatic effect on export efficiency. Statistical analysis has shown that the first ∼5–15 residues of the mature region of most presecretory proteins produced by Gram-negative bacteria is neutral or has a net negative charge (18). Consistent with the observed sequence bias, the presence of multiple basic residues at the N terminus of the mature region often leads to accumulation of the secretory precursor, whereas conversion of the basic residues to acidic residues restores export (19–22). Because different combinations of proteins and signal peptides were used in these studies, the exact number and location of charged residues that impinge on the efficiency of export is unclear. In any case, the effect of the net charge in the region distal to the signal peptide on protein export has never been explained. Although basic residues might conceivably promote premature folding of presecretory proteins or block the cleavage of signal peptides by leader peptidase, it is also possible that they inhibit an uncharacterized post-targeting event. Even if effects on signal peptide cleavage could have been ruled out in the aforementioned studies, however, it would not have been possible to distinguish between effects on protein folding and effects on a hypothetical post-targeting step because only proteins that are targeted post-translationally were monitored.To gain further insight into the factors that govern the efficiency of protein export, we sought an explanation for the observation that the cotranslational targeting of at least some cytoplasmic proteins is insufficient to guarantee their translocation across the IM. We found that the export of several different endogenous E. coli cytoplasmic proteins required not only the attachment of a signal peptide that is recognized by SRP but also a net negative charge just past the signal peptide cleavage site. Taken together with previous results, our data show that the charge of the segment just beyond the signal peptide influences export efficiency irrespective of the mechanism by which a protein is targeted to the IM. Because proteins that are targeted cotranslationally reach the IM before they have a chance to fold, our results imply the existence of a post-targeting step (most likely the initiation of translocation) that is facilitated by acidic residues distal to the signal peptide and inhibited or delayed by basic residues. These results help to resolve a long-standing puzzle about the influence of the mature region of presecretory proteins on protein export and have significant implications for optimizing the export of cytosolic and heterologous proteins in E. coli.     

Versatile signal peptide of Flavobacterium‐originated organophosphorus hydrolase for efficient periplasmic translocation of heterologous proteins in Escherichia coli

Organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH) from Flavobacterium species is a membrane‐associated homodimeric metalloenzyme and has its own signal peptide in its N‐terminus. We found that OPH was translocated into the periplasmic space when the original signal peptide‐containing OPH was expressed in recombinant Escherichia coli even though its translocation efficiency was relatively low. To investigate the usability of this OPH signal peptide for periplasmic expression of heterologous proteins in an E. coli system, we employed green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a cytoplasmic folding reporter and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as a periplasmic folding reporter. We found that the OPH signal peptide was able to use both twin‐arginine translocation (Tat) and general secretory (Sec) machineries by switching translocation pathways according to the nature of target proteins in E. coli. These results might be due to the lack of Sec‐avoidance sequence in the c‐region and a moderate hydrophobicity of the OPH signal peptide. Interestingly, the OPH signal peptide considerably enhanced the translocation efficiencies for both GFP and ALP compared with commonly used TorA and PelB signal peptides that have Tat and Sec pathway dependences, respectively. Therefore, this OPH signal peptide could be successfully used in recombinant E. coli system for efficient periplasmic production of target protein regardless of the subcellular localization where functional folding of the protein occurs. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 32:848–854, 2016     

Effect of export-specific cytoplasmic chaperone, protein SecB, on secretion of Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatase

The efficiency of secretion of Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatase depends on the presence in cells of a cytoplasmic chaperone—protein SecB. Secretion increases in the presence of this chaperone at 30°C, which is the most favorable for the interaction of SecB with the export-initiation domain found previously in the N-terminal region of the mature enzyme. This interaction most likely occurs in the region of the export domain, which is located close to the signal peptide and in complex with a translocational ATPase—protein SecA.     

Regions of maltose-binding protein that influence SecB-dependent and SecA-dependent export in Escherichia coli.

In Escherichia coli, the efficient export of maltose-binding protein (MBP) is dependent on the chaperone SecB, whereas export of ribose-binding protein (RBP) is SecB independent. To localize the regions of MBP involved in interaction with SecB, hybrids between MBP and RBP in SecB mutant cells were constructed and analyzed. One hybrid consisted of the signal peptide and first third of the mature moiety of MBP, followed by the C-terminal two-thirds of RBP (MBP-RBP112). This hybrid was dependent upon SecB for its efficient export and exhibited a strong export defect in secA mutant cells. A hybrid between RBP and MBP with the same fusion point was also constructed (RBP-MBP116). The RBP-MBP116 hybrid remained SecB independent and only exhibited a partial export defect in secA mutant cells. In addition, MBP species with specific alterations in the early mature region were less dependent on SecB for their efficient export. The export of these altered MBP species was also less affected in secA mutant cells and in cells treated with sodium azide. These results present additional evidence for the targeting role of SecB.     

Recognition of secretory proteins in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis> requires signals in addition to the signal sequence and slow folding

Background  

The Sec-dependent protein export apparatus of Escherichia coli is very efficient at correctly identifying proteins to be exported from the cytoplasm. Even bacterial strains that carry prl mutations, which allow export of signal sequence-defective precursors, accurately differentiate between cytoplasmic and mutant secretory proteins. It was proposed previously that the basis for this precise discrimination is the slow folding rate of secretory proteins, resulting in binding by the secretory chaperone, SecB, and subsequent targeting to translocase. Based on this proposal, we hypothesized that a cytoplasmic protein containing a mutation that slows its rate of folding would be recognized by SecB and therefore targeted to the Sec pathway. In a Prl suppressor strain the mutant protein would be exported to the periplasm due to loss of ability to reject non-secretory proteins from the pathway.     

Genetic analysis of pathway specificity during posttranslational protein translocation across the Escherichia coli plasma membrane

In Escherichia coli, the SecB/SecA branch of the Sec pathway and the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway represent two alternative possibilities for posttranslational translocation of proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane. Maintenance of pathway specificity was analyzed using a model precursor consisting of the mature part of the SecB-dependent maltose-binding protein (MalE) fused to the signal peptide of the Tat-dependent TorA protein. The TorA signal peptide selectively and specifically directed MalE into the Tat pathway. The characterization of a spontaneous TorA signal peptide mutant (TorA*), in which the two arginine residues in the c-region had been replaced by one leucine residue, showed that the TorA*-MalE mutant precursor had acquired the ability for efficiently using the SecB/SecA pathway. Despite the lack of the "Sec avoidance signal," the mutant precursor was still capable of using the Tat pathway, provided that the kinetically favored Sec pathway was blocked. These results show that the h-region of the TorA signal peptide is, in principle, sufficiently hydrophobic for Sec-dependent protein translocation, and therefore, the positively charged amino acid residues in the c-region represent a major determinant for Tat pathway specificity. Tat-dependent export of TorA-MalE was significantly slower in the presence of SecB than in its absence, showing that SecB can bind to this precursor despite the presence of the Sec avoidance signal in the c-region of the TorA signal peptide, strongly suggesting that the function of the Sec avoidance signal is not the prevention of SecB binding; rather, it must be exerted at a later step in the Sec pathway.     

Export and sorting of theEscherichia coli outer membrane protein OmpA

Results of studies, mostly using the outer membrane, 325 residue protein OmpA, are reviewed which concern its translocation across the plasma membrane and incorporation into the outer membrane ofEscherichia coli. For translocation, neither a unique export signal, acting in a positive fashion within the mature part of the precursor, nor a unique conformation of the precursor is required. Rather, the mature part of a secretory protein has to be export-compatible. Export-incompatibility can be caused by a stretch of 16 (but not 8 or 12) hydrophobic residues, too low a size of the polypeptide (smaller than 75 residue precursors), net positive charge at the N-terminus, or lack of a turn potential at the same site. It is not yet clear whether binding sites for chaperonins (SecB, trigger factor, GroEL) within OmpA are importantin vivo. The mechanism of sorting of outer membrane proteins is not yet understood. The membrane part of OmpA, encompassing residues 1 to about 170, it thought to traverse the membrane eight times in antiparallel -sheet conformation. At least the structure of the last -strand (residues 160–170) is of crucial importance for membrane assembly. It must be amphiphilic or hydrophobic, these properties must extend over at least nine residues, and it must not contain a proline residue at or near its center. Membrane incorporation of OmpA involves a conformational change of the protein and it could be that the last -strand initiates folding and assembly in the outer membrane.     

Thirty-three amino acids of the mature moiety of an unprocessed maltose-binding protein are sufficient for export in Escherichia coli.

Maltose-binding protein (MBP) is translocated across the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli; successful export depends on information in both the signal peptide and the mature moiety of the protein. To determine the shortest portion of the mature region that would maintain detectable entry of MBP into the export pathway, we took advantage of the properties of an MBP species with proline substituted in the +1 position relative to the cleavage site (MBP27-P). This protein efficiently crosses the cytoplasmic membrane but is not processed and acts as a competitive inhibitor of signal peptidase I (leader peptidase). Export of MBP27-P is measured by the inhibition of processing of other proteins, such as ribose-binding protein (RBP). A series of truncated derivatives of MBP27-P were tested for the ability to inhibit processing of RBP. An MBP27-P species with only 33 amino acids of the mature moiety inhibited processing of RBP, indicating that this truncated polypeptide was probably exported and interacted with signal peptidase I.     

Export and processing of MalE-LacZ hybrid proteins in Escherichia coli

Five classes of MalE-LacZ hybrid proteins have previously been characterized. These proteins differ in the amount of the maltose-binding protein (MBP) that is attached to beta-galactosidase. Although none of these proteins is secreted into the periplasm, the four larger classes of hybrid proteins, those that include an intact MBP signal peptide, are inserted into the cytoplasmic membrane, suggesting that the secretion process has at least been initiated. In this study, we demonstrated that some portion of the four larger hybrid proteins can be translocated across the cytoplasmic membrane, thus permitting processing of the signal peptide. We have found that hybrid proteins that include only a small portion of the mature MBP are inefficiently recognized as exported proteins, and translocation and processing of these appear to be relatively slow, posttranslational events. In marked contrast, hybrid proteins that include a substantial portion of the mature MBP are efficiently recognized, and translocation and processing of these occur very rapidly, possibly cotranslationally. Our results complement other studies and very strongly suggest a role for the mature MBP in the export process.     

The antifolding activity of SecB promotes the export of the E. coli maltose-binding protein

Evidence is presented that the E. coli secB gene encodes a soluble protein that interacts with the mature region of the precursor maltose-binding protein (MBP), and promotes MBP export by preventing premature folding of the newly synthesized polypeptide into an export-incompetent form. The interaction of SecB with MBP was indicated by the finding that synthesis of various export-defective MBP species interfered with normal protein export by limiting SecB availability. The antifolding activity of SecB was demonstrated by the following: the defect in MBP export in SecB- cells was suppressed by mutational alterations affecting MBP folding; export of a mutant MBP that is accomplished in a strictly posttranslational mode was totally blocked in SecB- cells; and the rate of folding of wild-type MBP synthesized in vitro was found to be accelerated when SecB was absent and greatly retarded when excess SecB was present.