Binocular fusion in Panum’s limiting case of stereopsis obeys the uniqueness constraint

In the information processing procedure of stereo vision, the uniqueness constraint has been used as one of the constraints to solve the “correspondence problem”. While the uniqueness constraint is valid in most cases, whether it is still valid in some particular stimulus configuration (such as Panum’s limiting case) has been a problem of widespread debate for a long time. To investigate the problem, we adopted the Panum’s limiting case as its basic stimulus configuration, and delved into the phenomenon of binocular fusion from two distinct aspects: visual direction and orientation disparity. The results show that in Panum’s limiting case binocular fusion does not comply with the rules governing regular binocular fusion as far as visual direction and orientation disparity are concerned. This indicates that double fusion does not happen in Panum’s limiting case and that the uniqueness constraint is still valid.     

Binocular fusion in Panum’s limiting case of stereopsis obeys the uniqueness constraint

In the information processing procedure of stereo vision, the uniqueness constraint has been used as one of the constraints to solve the “correspondence problem”. While the uniqueness constraint is valid in most cases, whether it is still valid in some particular stimulus configuration (such as Panum’s limiting case) has been a problem of widespread debate for a long time. To investigate the problem, we adopted the Panum’s limiting case as its basic stimulus configuration, and delved into the phenomenon of binocular fusion from two distinct aspects: visual direction and orientation disparity. The results show that in Panum’s limiting case binocular fusion does not comply with the rules governing regular binocular fusion as far as visual direction and orientation disparity are concerned. This indicates that double fusion does not happen in Panum’s limiting case and that the uniqueness constraint is still valid.     

Identification and estimation of the proportion of limiting cell types involved in the phytohemagglutinin response by limiting cell dose-response analysis

Fluoresceinated peanut agglutinin (PNA-FITC) and a monoclonal anti-T-cell antibodies were used to identify human thymocyte subpopulations. The phenotypes of PNA+ and PNA? thymocytes were studied using two different techniques: agglutination with PNA and double-labeling immunofluorescence. The mitogen-responsive PNA- subset was shown to include early thymocytes bearing the OKT9 antigen as well as lymphocytes with the OKT3 phenotype. Nearly all PNA+ thymocytes were found to bind simultaneously OKT4, OKT6, and OKT8 antibodies, whereas about 30% of them weakly bind the OKT3 antibody. These data suggest the existence of several intermediate stages of intrathymic differentiation, including a subset simultaneously bearing the OKT6- and OKT3-defined antigens.     

Kinetic studies of the reaction mechanism of rat liver phosphoglycerate kinase in the direction of ADP utilization

The kinetic properties of rat liver phosphoglycerate kinase were investigated in the forward direction of the reaction (utilization of ADP). The kinetic studies were performed in an assay system using combined hexokinase/glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase as an ATP trap. The Km values for Mg ADP1- and 1,3-diphospho-D-glycerate were approximately 0.11 and 0.006 mM, respectively. Reciprocal plots of 1/v versus 1/ (Mg ADP1-) at different fixed concentrations of 1,3-diphospho-D-glycerate and 1/v versus 1/ (1,3-diphospho-D-glycerate) at different fixed concentrations of Mg ADP1- were apparently parallel. However, product inhibition studies (3-phospho-D-glycerate), dead-end inhibition studies (2,3-diphospho-D-glycerate), and adenosine and AMP inhibition patterns yielded results consistent with a rapid equilibrium random mechanism in which the binding of one substrate greatly decreases the affinity of the enzyme for the second substrate. Existence of two sites for 3-phospho-D-glycerate is suggested.